Mental health
Self-harm
Last revised in February 2025
Self-harm refers to an intentional act of self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of the motivation or apparent purpose of the act
Self-harm: Summary
- Self-harm refers to an intentional act of self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of the motivation or apparent purpose of the act, and is an expression of emotional distress.
- The majority of self-poisoning episodes involve prescribed or over-the-counter medication, and a minority involve illicit drugs, other household substances, or plant material.
- The majority of self-injury episodes involve cutting.
- Self-harm includes suicide attempts as well as acts involving little or no suicidal intent.
- Risk factors for self-harm include socioeconomic disadvantage, social isolation, stressful life events, mental and physical health problems, isolation or marginalised groups, and alcohol or drug misuse.
- Following an episode of self-harm, suicide risk is significantly increased, particularly in people who have repeatedly self-harmed, who are male, have expressed suicidal intent, and who have physical health problems.
- All people presenting following an act of self-harm should be assessed at the earliest opportunity. This includes:
- In primary care, a physical assessment of the severity of the injury and how urgently medical treatment is needed; the person's emotional and mental state and level of distress; whether there is an immediate concern about the person's safety; and the need to refer the person to a specialist mental health service for assessment.
- Psychosocial assessment, exploring the person's strengths, vulnerabilities, and needs. This should be conducted by a mental health professional. The assessment should not be delayed whilst waiting for medical treatment, for example, after self-poisoning. If they are unable to co-operate, they should be reviewed regularly until this is possible.
- Formulating a plan for further management that takes account of the person's situation and wishes.
- Any safeguarding concerns relating to the person and also any children, young people, or vulnerable adults dependent on them for care.
- The mental health professional should be appropriately trained to perform the assessment — for a child or young person, or for an older adult.
- Risk assessment tools and scales should not be used to assess future risk of suicide or episodes of self-harm.
- Risk assessment tools and scales should not be used to guide who is offered treatment or discharge.
- Immediate management following an act of self-harm might involve:
- If there is physical injury — urgent referral to the nearest emergency department.
- If the person has a minor self-injury — initial treatment in primary care followed by referral for psychosocial assessment.
- If the person has self-poisoned — urgent referral to the nearest emergency department.
- Assessment of mental capacity may be needed if a person declines or refuses management that is perceived to be in their best interests.
- Following an act of self-harm, a review in primary care should be offered within 48 hours, where appropriate.
- Alternatively, a person may present to primary care at risk of self-harm. Follow up for these people includes:
- Ensuring that an assessment of their psychosocial needs has been carried out, or referring for an assessment to be undertaken.
- Where necessary and appropriate, referral to the crisis resolution and home treatment team, community mental health team, or drug and alcohol services.
- Preventing access to any means of self-harm including careful prescribing of drugs.
- Offering information about sources of support, groups, and voluntary organizations.
- Ensuring that all members of the multidisciplinary team are kept informed about the person, and appropriate ongoing follow up is arranged.
- For people who have previously self-harmed long-term management options, usually arranged by community mental health teams, liaison psychiatry teams, or Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), include:
- Harm minimization techniques and developing alternative coping strategies, where appropriate.
- Ensuring the person has a care plan and crisis plan.
- Referral for psychological interventions, if needed.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 8 years onwards.
This CKS topic covers the initial and ongoing management of adults and children aged over 8 years presenting in primary care following an act of self-harm or presenting at risk of an act of self-harm. Self-harm refers to an act of intentional self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of motivation.
This CKS topic does not cover the management of self-injurious behaviour including head-banging, skin-picking, and nail-biting, which may be more common in people with a learning disability. It also does not cover the management of associated mental health disorders, such as depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, or the management of harm from excessive consumption of alcohol or recreational drugs.
There are separate CKS topics on Alcohol - problem drinking, Generalized anxiety disorder, Bipolar disorder, Depression, Depression - antenatal and postnatal, Depression in children, Generalized anxiety disorder, Opioid dependence, Poisoning or overdose, Post-traumatic stress disorder, and Psychosis and schizophrenia.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
February 2025 — minor update. Added detail relating to the NICE guidance Gambling-related harms: identification, assessment and management [NICE, 2025].
Previous changes
August 2024 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in July 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone restructuring. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
November 2023 — minor update. Update to the text relating to assessment of suicide risk added.
September 2022 — minor update. This topic has been updated to align with the NICE guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence, which replaces the NICE guidelines Self-harm in over 8s: short-term management and prevention of recurrence and Self-harm in over 8s: long-term management. The updated NICE quality standard Self-harm has also been added. This topic has been updated to align with the NICE guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence, which replaces the NICE guidelines Self-harm in over 8s: short-term management and prevention of recurrence and Self-harm in over 8s: long-term management. The updated NICE quality standard Self-harm has also been added.
August 2020 — minor update. Broken URL link updated.
January to February 2020 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2020 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone restructuring. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
April to August 2014 — new topic. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
- NICE (2025) Gambling-related harms: identification, assessment and management National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Homepage | NICE [Free full-text]
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 July 2024.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 July 2024.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 July 2024.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 July 2024.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 July 2024.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 July 2024.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 July 2024.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Recognize when a person is at risk of self-harm or suicide.
- Offer people who have self-harmed, or are at risk of self-harm, an appropriate initial assessment.
- Refer people who have self-harmed to an emergency department, or manage in primary care, as appropriate, including referring to secondary mental health services, or the community mental health team for further assessment.
- Monitor and follow-up people in primary care after an episode of self-harm and ensure they have a longer-term care plan and ongoing support, if appropriate.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.NICE quality standards
Self-harm
- People who have self-harmed are cared for with compassion and the same respect and dignity as any service user.
- People who have self-harmed have an initial assessment of physical health, mental state, safeguarding concerns, social circumstances and immediate concerns about their safety.
- People who have self-harmed receive a psychosocial assessment.
- People who have self-harmed receive the observation they need while in the healthcare setting.
- People who have self-harmed are cared for in a safe physical environment while in the healthcare setting.
- People receiving continuing support for self-harm have a collaboratively developed care plan.
- People receiving continuing support for self-harm have a discussion with their healthcare professional about the potential benefits of psychological interventions specifically structured for people who self-harm.
- People receiving continuing support for self-harm and moving between mental health services have a collaboratively developed plan describing how support will be provided during the transition.
Suicide prevention
- Adults presenting with suicidal thoughts or plans discuss whether they would like their family, carers or friends to be involved in their care and are made aware of the limits of confidentiality.
- People bereaved or affected by a suspected suicide are given information and offered tailored support.
Background information
What is it?
- Self-harm refers to an intentional act of self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of the motivation or apparent purpose of the act, and is an expression of emotional distress.
- Further classification includes suicide attempt (some intent to die) and non-suicidal self-injury (no intent to die). In acts where there is little or no suicidal intent, it is thought that people harm themselves to reduce internal tension, communicate distress, or obtain relief from an otherwise overwhelming situation.
- The majority of self-poisoning episodes involve prescribed or over-the-counter medication, and a minority involve illicit drugs, other household substances, or plant material.
- The majority of self-injury episodes involve cutting.
- Less common methods include burning, hanging, stabbing, drowning, swallowing objects, insertion, shooting, and jumping from heights or in front of vehicles.
- From a psycho-analytical perspective self-harm is said to be 'a way of communication, through actions, to deal with psychic pain and vulnerability'. The associated behaviours relieve the subject of the built-up tension, albeit briefly.
[Clarke, 2019; Knipe, 2022; NICE, 2022c; Persano, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]
How common is it?
Accuracy of epidemiological data concerning self-harm are hampered by under-reporting. UK data suggest 60% of adults and 90% of young people aged 12-17 do not contact medical or psychological services after self-harming [Knipe, 2022]. Alternative estimations suggest only 1 in 28 young men and 1 in 18 young women will seek professional help [Fenton, 2023].
A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis of global data between 1989 and 2018 showed that the aggregate lifetime prevalence and 12 month prevalence for non-suicidal self-injury among children and adolescents were 22.1% and 19.5% respectively [Lim, 2019]. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of data published in English or French dealing with suicide or self-harm in children aged under 12 years reported that the pooled prevalence from four studies was 1.4%, and was similar for both sexes [Geoffroy, 2022].
- The 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey reported that in England:
- The proportion of people aged 16–74 years who reported having ever self-harmed increased from 2.4% in 2000 to 3.8% in 2007 and 6.4% in 2014. This increase was observed in both men and women and across age groups.
- 25.7% of 16 to 24-year-old women reported having self-harmed at some point; more than twice the rate for men in this age group (9.7%). The rate in women aged 25–34 years was 13.2%.
- In 2014, 5.4% of 16–74 year olds reported suicidal thoughts in the past year, compared with 3.8% reporting this in 2000.
- Around one in every 20 men and one in every 12 women have attempted suicide at some point, with the highest rates in women aged 16–24 years and men aged 25–34 years.
- The Office of National Statistics reported that in 2022 in the UK:
- There were 10.7 deaths from suicide per 100,000 population.
- Rates in men were 16.4 per 100,000, and in women were 5.4 per 100,000. The male rate had fallen slightly from that observed in 2018, while the female rate has been stable for around 10 years.
- The highest completed suicide rate is seen in both men and women aged 50–54 years (15.2 per 100,000 in men and 7.8 per 100,000 in women).
- Since the 1980s there has been a gradual decline in the overall suicide rate. However, the suicide rate in women aged under 25 years has significantly increased since 2012.
- Suicide rates in men aged over 90 years were also significantly higher in 2022. It has been observed around the world that suicide rates tend to increase in the oldest age groups for both men and women, with factors such as psychiatric illness, deterioration of physical health and functioning, and social factors believed to be contributory.
It is thought that the overall higher rate of suicide in men despite the higher rate of self-harm in women may be due to the choice of more lethal methods (firearms and hanging as opposed to cutting or poisoning).
What are the risk factors?
Risk factors for self-harm include:
- Age — self-harm rates peak in 16 to 24-year-old women and 25 to 34-year-old men. Suicide rates are highest in both men and women aged 50–54 years.
- Socio-economic disadvantage.
- Social isolation and marginalised groups (minorities by virtue of ethnicity, gender identity, and sexuality).
- Stressful life events, for example, relationship difficulties, previous experience in the armed forces, child maltreatment, child or adult attachment disorders, or domestic violence.
- Bereavement by suicide.
- Mental health problems, such as depression, psychosis or schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or a personality disorder.
- Psychological and personality factors such as impulsivity, neuroticism, and perfectionism).
- Neurodevelopmental disorders such as autistic spectrum disorder.
- Chronic physical health problems.
- Alcohol and/or drug misuse.
- Gambling-related harms.
- Involvement with the criminal justice system (with people in prison being at particular risk).
[Clarke, 2019; Sabus, 2019; Wrath, 2019; Blanchard, 2021; Son, 2021; Knipe, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023; NICE, 2025]
What are the complications and prognosis?
- Complications from self-harm include:
- Acute liver failure following paracetamol overdose — a multicentre study that analysed data from 2005 to 2007 from seven European countries found that in the UK, 28% of liver transplants were for acute liver failure caused by paracetamol poisoning, while across the whole area of study, the rate was 20% [Gulmez, 2015].
- Permanent scarring of skin and damage to tendons and nerves caused by self-cutting and other injuries.
- Repetitive self-harm is common. Approximately 15% of people attending an accident and emergency department following an act of self-harm will self-harm again within 1 year [McCabe, 2023].
- Overall, self-harm is associated with an elevated suicide risk. However, the relationship between suicide and self-harm is complex, with some people who self-harm viewing it as an act of 'self-preservation'. It has also been noted that while suicide may not be intended when a person begins to self-harm, suicidal intention may develop over time.
- The risk of suicide is estimated to be between 0.5-2.0% after 1 year but 5% after 9 years [McCabe, 2023].
- Studies have identified that the risk of suicide may be particularly increased in people who self-harm who:
- Are male.
- Repeatedly self-harm.
- Also have physical health problems.
- Express suicidal intent.
Management
Scenario: Acute management following an act of self-harm
From age 8 years onwards.
How should I manage a person presenting following an act of self-harm?
- When a person presents in primary care following an act of self-harm:
- Treat the person with respect, dignity and compassion, with an awareness of cultural sensitivity.
- Establish the means of self-harm and, if accessible to the person, discuss removing this with therapeutic collaboration or negotiation, to keep the person safe.
- For information on the management of self-poisoning, see the CKS topic on Poisoning or overdose.
- Be aware that for people who have self-poisoned, accurate assessment may be difficult as the nature and quantity of the ingested substances may not be clear. In most circumstances, people who have self-poisoned should, therefore, be urgently referred to the nearest emergency department. Where there is uncertainty about the need for referral, consider accessing TOXBASE® (the clinical toxicology database of the National Poisons Information Service [NPIS]). For more information, see the TOXBASE® website http://www.toxbase.org/, or telephone the UK NPIS on 0344 892 0111 for a patient-specific risk assessment.
- Assess whether there are concerns about capacity, competence, consent or duty of care, and seek advice from a senior colleague or appropriate clinical support if necessary; be aware and accept that the person may have a different view and this needs to be taken into account.
- Seek consent to liaise with those involved in the person's care (including family members and carers, as appropriate) to gather information to understand the context of and reasons for the self-harm.
- Discuss with the person and their families or carers (as appropriate), their current support network, and any safety plan or coping strategies.
- Establish the following as soon as possible:
- The severity of the injury and how urgently medical treatment is needed.
- The person's emotional and mental state, and level of distress.
- Whether there is immediate concern about the person's safety.
- Whether there are any safeguarding concerns.
- Whether the person has a care plan.
- The need to refer the person to a specialist mental health service for assessment.
- For people who find it difficult to vocalise their distress, support them their family members or carers (as appropriate) in trying alternative methods of communication (such as non-verbal language, letters, emotional wellbeing passports, and using agreed safe words, phrases or emojis).
- Carry out concurrent physical healthcare and a psychosocial assessment as soon as possible after a self-harm episode.
- Assess their needs, including a full mental health and social needs assessment.
- This should include the social, psychological and motivational factors surrounding the act of self-harm. It should also explore any suicidal intent and any feelings of hopelessness.
- It should also include a full mental health and social needs assessment.
- Assess their risks, including clinical and demographic factors associated with their self-harm.
- This should identify the clinical and demographic factors that are associated with a higher risk for further self-harm or suicide. It should also identify any psychological characteristics such as depression, or other psychiatric co-morbidity.
- This should identify the clinical and demographic factors that are associated with a higher risk for further self-harm or suicide. It should also identify any psychological characteristics such as depression, or other psychiatric co-morbidity.
- If the appropriate expertise is not available in primary care arrange referral to a mental health specialist.
- Assess their needs, including a full mental health and social needs assessment.
- Risk assessment tools and scales should not be used to assess future risk of suicide or episodes of self-harm.
- Risk assessment tools and scales should not be used to guide who is offered treatment or discharge.
- Consider referring the person to mental health or social care services for a psychosocial assessment or informing their existing mental health team, with consent from the person and their family members or carers (as appropriate).
- Make referral to mental health professionals a priority when:
- The person's levels of concern or distress are rising, high, or sustained.
- The frequency or degree of self-harm or suicidal intent is increasing.
- The person providing assessment in primary care is concerned.
- The person asks for further support from mental health services.
- Levels of distress in family members or carers of children, young people and adults are rising, high, or sustained, despite attempts to help.
- Consider admission to a general hospital after an episode of self-harm if:
- There are concerns about the safety of the person (for example, the person is at risk of violence, abuse, or exploitation) and psychiatric admission is not indicated.
- Safeguarding planning needs to be completed and psychiatric admission is not indicated.
- The person is unable to engage in a psychosocial assessment (for example, because they are too distressed or intoxicated).
- Do not use aversive treatment, punitive approaches or criminal justice approaches such as community protection notices, criminal behaviour orders, or prosecution for high service use as an intervention for frequent self-harm episodes.
- Discuss and agree with the person, and their family members and carers (as appropriate) the purpose, format, and frequency of initial aftercare and which services will be involved in their care.
- Record this in the person's care plan and ensure that the person and their family members and carers have a copy of the plan and contact details for the team providing the aftercare.
- Ensure that a mental health professional with appropriate experience carries out a psychosocial assessment in:
- Older people.
- People with a learning disability.
- Children and young people.
- Assess for any safeguarding concerns in children, young people, or vulnerable adults:
- Dependent for their care on the person presenting with an episode of self-harm.
- Presenting with an episode of self-harm that may have occurred in response to child maltreatment, domestic violence, or other violence or exploitation. For more information, see the CKS topic on Child maltreatment - recognition and management.
- Where safeguarding concerns are identified, follow local safeguarding procedures.
- If the person's physical injuries and/or acute mental state are significant, offer urgent referral to the nearest emergency department. If there is any doubt seek advice from an emergency department consultant.
- If referral to an emergency department is necessary, consider arranging for the person to be accompanied, particularly if there is a risk of further self-harm, or the person is reluctant to attend, or very distressed.
- If a child or young person has self-harmed, ensure they are referred to the nearest emergency department with expertise in dealing with people under the age of 16 years.
- If the person's physical injuries and/or acute mental state are not thought to necessitate referral to an emergency department:
- Provide wound management as appropriate.
- Determine the need for urgent referral to appropriate secondary mental health services, or onward referral to the community mental health team, and referral to drug and alcohol services. Consider:
- The person's psychosocial needs, including home environment, living arrangements, social and family support network, personal relationships that may be supportive or represent a threat, needs of any dependent children, need for social care and support, history leading to the episode of self-harm/apparent motivation, recent life events and current difficulties, functioning at work and finances, need for occupational rehabilitation or financial advice, personal skills, strengths, assets, coping strategies, and the need for psychological intervention.
- Provide emotional support and help if necessary to the relatives/carers of people who have self-harmed, as they may also be experiencing high levels of distress and anxiety.
- Arrange follow up for the person who has self-harmed, within 48 hours of discharge from hospital to ensure any required ongoing management of psychosocial needs and risk of further self-harm or suicide. See the section on Initial follow up for more information.
- Ensure any person who has self-harmed gives informed consent for management, wherever possible.
- If a person declines or refuses management that is perceived to be in their best interests, assess their mental capacity, to help decide whether they are unable to make an informed decision about whether to accept or refuse treatment. Mental capacity should be assumed in a person aged 16 years or over, unless there is evidence to the contrary. If possible, gather additional information from family, carers, and significant others, if the person allows.
- If a person refuses treatment, provide information about the potential consequences of not receiving treatment, while trying to gain consent.
- If a person is judged to have diminished capacity and/or the presence of a significant mental health disorder, refer for an urgent mental health assessment or hospital admission, depending on clinical judgement. Healthcare professionals have a duty to act in the person's best interests. This may include taking the person to hospital for further assessment and treatment against their wishes.
- If there is uncertainty about whether a person has capacity to make informed decisions, seek advice from a psychiatrist who has experience in assessing capacity. For more information, see the section on Assessing mental capacity.
- If a person declines or refuses management that is perceived to be in their best interests, assess their mental capacity, to help decide whether they are unable to make an informed decision about whether to accept or refuse treatment. Mental capacity should be assumed in a person aged 16 years or over, unless there is evidence to the contrary. If possible, gather additional information from family, carers, and significant others, if the person allows.
The Mental Capacity Act (2005)
- Mental capacity refers to the ability of a person to make a decision (or take a particular course of action) at a time when it is needed. It may change over time, for example, with changing levels of consciousness, emotional distress, or due to the effects of alcohol and/or drugs. Capacity may also vary according to the decision that needs to be made. The Mental Capacity Act (2005) states that all people aged 16 years and over are presumed to have capacity. It aims to balance a person's right to make decisions for themselves with their right to be protected from harm.
- The Mental Capacity Act (2005) has five key principles:
- Presumption of capacity — adults should always be presumed to have the capacity to make a decision, unless the healthcare professional can prove otherwise.
- Maximizing decision-making capacity — the person must be given all practical support before it can be decided that they lack capacity. Support may involve extra time for assessment, repeating the assessment if capacity fluctuates, or using an interpreter, sign language, or pictures.
- The freedom to make seemingly unwise decisions — if the person makes a seemingly unwise decision, this in itself is not proof of incapacity. Proof of incapacity depends on the process by which the decision is made, not the decision itself.
- Best interests — any decision or action taken on behalf of the person must be in their best interests. If the decision can be delayed until the person regains capacity, then it should be. A decision taken on another's behalf should take account of their wishes, including those expressed in an advance decision, and their beliefs and values. The decision-making process should involve, when appropriate, family, carers, and significant others.
- The least restrictive alternative — when a decision is made on the person's behalf, the healthcare professional must choose the alternative that interferes least with the person's rights and freedoms while still achieving the necessary goal.
- To assess capacity, confirm that the person has an impairment of the mind or brain, which means they are unable to either:
- Understand relevant information about the decision to be made.
- Retain that information.
- Use or weigh that information as part of the decision-making process.
- Communicate their decision (by talking, non-verbal communication, or any other means).
- Healthcare professionals should understand:
- The Mental Capacity Act (2005) applies in England and Wales.
- The Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act (2000) applies in Scotland. For more information, see the British Medical Association's (BMA's) document Ethics toolkit: Adults with incapacity, Scotland [BMA, 2024a].
- In Northern Ireland, common law applies.
- When and how the Mental Health Act (1983) can be used in the urgent assessment of people who have self-harmed to treat the physical consequences of self-harm, if their behaviour has been caused by a mental health condition.
- That they have a duty to protect confidentiality wherever possible, but medical information may be disclosed without consent if a person lacks capacity and it is in their best interests.
- If it is necessary to breach confidentiality, ensure that the person who has self-harmed is still involved in decisions about their care and, where possible, is informed about the breach of confidentiality.
- For additional information, see the BMA's Mental Capacity Toolkit.
Capacity and confidentiality issues in young people aged 16–17 years
- For young people aged 16–17 years who lack capacity, parents can consent on their behalf if the decision to be made is felt to be within parental control. Healthcare professionals are, however, able to give treatment regardless of whether parental consent has been given, as long as the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) are followed, and the decision is judged to be in the young person's best interests.
- If a young person who self-harms and has capacity refuses to involve their family or carers in their treatment, or refuses consent to disclose issues relating to their safety to family or carers, healthcare professionals must weigh the young person's right to confidentiality (and risk to the therapeutic relationship if confidentiality is breached) against providing family and carers with sufficient information to protect and care for the young person. For further information, see the Care Quality Commission's guidance Brief guide: capacity and competence to consent in under 18s [CQC, 2019].
The Mental Health Act (1983, amended 2007)
- The Mental Health Act (1983) allows compulsory admission of people who:
- Have a mental disorder of a nature and degree that warrants treatment in hospital, and
- Need to be admitted in the interests of their own health or safety, or for the protection of other people.
- Compulsory admission is arranged using the appropriate section of the Mental Health Act:
- Section 2 allows compulsory admission for up to 28 days for assessment.
- Section 3 allows compulsory admission for up to 6 months for treatment.
- Sections 2 and 3 require an application from an Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP; formerly an Approved Social Worker), or, rarely, the person's nearest relative, and recommendations from two doctors; one of whom is section 12-approved (usually a psychiatrist) and one who has previous acquaintance with the person (usually the person's GP if at all practicable).
- Ideally, the person should be examined jointly by the two doctors with the AMHP also present. Where this is not possible, each doctor may carry out a separate examination. If the AMHP is not present, it is essential that at least one of the doctors discusses the person with the AMHP.
- Section 4 is used in exceptional cases to permit compulsory admission for up to 72 hours if there is urgent necessity, and undesirable delay would occur while trying to arrange admission under section 2.
- Section 4 requires an application from an AMHP (or, rarely, the person's nearest relative) and just one medical recommendation, preferably from a doctor with previous acquaintance (usually the person's GP).
- Section 136 may be used by police to take people from a public place to a place of safety and enable examination by a registered medical practitioner and interview by an AMHP. The person's GP, where known, may be informed.
- Details of guidance and forms for the most common sections of the Mental Health Act can be accessed from the Department of Health website, as well as details of amendments made in the Mental Health Act 2007.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and prevention of recurrence [NICE, 2022c], the accompanying commentary New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed [Mughal, 2023] and what CKS considers good medical practice.
Assessing mental capacity
- The key principles of the Mental Capacity Act are taken from the British Medical Association's Mental Capacity Act toolkit (England and Wales) [BMA, 2024b]. There are separate toolkits for Scotland [BMA, 2024a] and Northern Ireland [BMA, 2024c].
- The recommendation to refer the person for an urgent mental health assessment or hospital admission if they are judged to have diminished capacity and/or the presence of a significant mental health disorder is pragmatic advice based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice. CKS acknowledges that diminished capacity may have multiple causes, including drugs, alcohol, and acute delirium, as well as mental health states, such as psychosis, and the person's place of care will depend on the likely underlying cause at the time of presentation.
Capacity and confidentiality issues in young people aged 16–17 years
- The information about capacity and confidentiality issues in young people who self-harm is based on the NICE guideline [NICE, 2022c], and the Care Quality Commission's guidance Brief guide: capacity and competence to consent in under 18s [CQC, 2019], and has been highlighted as this group may have a number of special needs owing to their vulnerability and family circumstances.
The Mental Health Act (1983)
- The information about the Mental Health Act derives from the guideline Reference Guide to the Mental Health Act 1983 produced by the Department of Health and Social Care [DH, 2015].
Initial follow up
- If there are ongoing safety concerns after an episode of self-harm, provide initial aftercare within 48 hours of the psychosocial assessment.
- If the person is being supported and given care in primary care, ensure that they have:
- Regular appointments for review of self-harm.
- A medicines review.
- Take into account the pharmacokinetic properties of medicines, for example, half-life, risk of toxicity, and the concurrent use of medicines such as benzodiazepines and opiates.
- If necessary, contact the National Poisons Information Service for further advice.
- For people with learning disabilities, autism, or both, the NHS England STOMP-STAMP principles may be useful.
- Information about available social care, voluntary and non-NHS sector support, and self-help resources.
- Care for any coexisting mental health problems, including referral to mental health services as appropriate.
- For further information, see the CKS topics on Generalized anxiety disorder, Depression, Depression - antenatal and postnatal, Psychosis and schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Dementia, Alcohol - problem drinking, and Opioid dependence.
- When planning treatment following self-harm, take into account any associated coexisting conditions and the psychosocial assessment.
- Offer a structured, person-centred, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-informed psychological intervention (for example, CBT or problem-solving therapy) that is specifically tailored for adults who self-harm. Ensure that the intervention:
- Starts as soon as possible.
- Is typically between 4 and 10 sessions; more sessions may be needed depending on individual needs.
- Is tailored to the person's needs and preferences.
- For children and young people with significant emotional dysregulation difficulties who have frequent episodes of self-harm, consider dialectical behaviour therapy adapted for adolescents (DBT-A). Take into account the age of the child or young person and any planned transition between services.
- Work collaboratively with the person, using a strengths-based approach to identify solutions to reduce their distress that leads to self-harm.
- Offer children and young people with significant emotional dysregulation who frequently self-harm, dialectic behavioural therapy adapted for adolescents (DBT-A).
- This is typically a 16-week behaviour programme accompanied by muti-family skills training sessions, and family therapy.
- The age of the young person needs to be considered when transferring between services.
- Consider developing a safety plan in partnership with people who have self-harmed. Safety plans should be used to:
- Establish the means of self-harm.
- Recognise the triggers and warning signs of increased distress, further self-harm, or a suicidal crisis.
- Identify individualised coping strategies, including problem-solving any factors that may act as a barrier.
- Identify social contacts and social settings as a means of distraction from suicidal thoughts or escalating crisis.
- Identify family members or friends to provide support and/or help resolve the crisis.
- Include contact details for the mental health service, including out-of-hours services and emergency contact details.
- Keep the environment safe by working collaboratively to remove or restrict lethal means of suicide.
- The safety plan should be in an accessible format and:
- Be developed collaboratively and compassionately between the person who has self-harmed and the professional involved in their care using the principles of shared decision-making.
- Be developed in collaboration with family and carers, as appropriate.
- Use a problem-solving approach.
- Be held by the person.
- Be shared with the family, carers and relevant professionals and practitioners as decided by the person be accessible to the person and the professionals and practitioners involved in their care at times of crisis.
- Do not:
- Use diagnosis, age, substance misuse, or coexisting conditions as reasons to withhold psychological interventions for self-harm.
- Offer drug treatment as a specific intervention to reduce self-harm.
- Use consultations and medicines reviews as an opportunity to assess self-harm if appropriate.
- For example, asking about thoughts of self-harm or suicide, actual self-harm, and access to substances that might be taken in overdose (including prescribed, over-the-counter medicines, herbal remedies, and recreational drugs).
- When prescribing medicines to someone who has previously self-harmed or who may self-harm in the future, take into account:
- The toxicity of the prescribed medicines for people at risk of overdose (for example, opiate-containing painkillers and tricyclic antidepressants).
- Their recreational drug and alcohol consumption, the risk of misuse, and possible interaction with prescribed medicines.
- The person's wider access to medicines prescribed for themselves or others.
- The need for effective communication where multiple prescribers are involved.
- Use shared decision-making to discuss limiting the quantity of medicines supplied to people with a history of self-harm (for example, weekly prescriptions), and ask them to return unwanted medicines for safe disposal.
- Ask the person whether and how they would like their family or carers to be involved in their care, and review this regularly. If the person agrees, share information with family members or carers (as appropriate), and encourage them to be involved. Take into account issues such as:
- Whether the person has consented for information to be shared and, if so, if the consent is limited to certain aspects of their care.
- Any safeguarding concerns.
- The person's mental capacity, age, and competence to make decisions.
- The person's right to confidentiality and autonomy in decision making.
- The balance between autonomy (in children and young people, their developing independence and maturity) and the need to involve family members or carers.
- The balance between the possible benefits and risks of involving family members of carers and the rights of the person.
- When involving family members or carers in supporting a person who has self-harmed:
- Encourage a collaborative approach to:
- Empower and support the person who has self-harmed.
- Minimise the person's self-harm behaviours.
- Support the person's recovery to prevent recurrence.
- Give them opportunities to be involved in decision-making, care planning and developing safety plans to support the person beyond the initial self-harm episode, and through their care pathway.
- Ensure that there is ongoing and timely communication with the family or carers.
- Regularly review whether the person who has self-harmed still wants their family or carers to be involved in their care, and ensure that they know they can withdraw consent to share information at any time.
- Note: if the person has not consented to involving their family or carers in their care, family members or carers can still provide information about the person.
- Encourage a collaborative approach to:
- Provide information and support for people who have self-harmed, and share information with family members or carers (as appropriate). Discuss the following:
- What is meant by the term self-harm.
- Why people self-harm and, where possible, the specific circumstances of the person.
- Support and treatments available.
- Self-care including when to seek help.
- How to deal with injuries.
- How to manage scars.
- Care plans and safety plans, and what they involve.
- The impact of encountering stigma around self-harm.
- Who will be involved in their care and how to get in touch with them.
- Where appointments will take place.
- What to do if they have any concerns.
- What do to in an emergency.
- Local services and how to get in touch with them, including out-of-hours.
- Local peer support groups, online forums, local and national charities, and how to get in touch with them. For example:
- Childline — a free, confidential telephone service for children, telephone 0800 1111.
- Selfharm (www.selfharm.co.uk) — provides support for young people affected by self-harm and has online support groups.
- YoungMinds (www.youngminds.org.uk) — has leaflets written for children about self-harm.
- Harmless (www.harmless.org.uk) — provides support and information to people who self-harm, their friends, and families; and training for healthcare professionals.
- Mind (www.mind.org.uk) — provides information and support, helplines, local support groups, and publications aimed at anyone who self-harms, and their friends and family.
- National Self Harm Network (www.nshn.co.uk) — aims to support, empower, and educate people who self-harm and their families and carers.
- Rethink Mental Illness (www.rethink.org) — provides a comprehensive factsheet about self-harm.
- Royal College of Psychiatrists (www.rcpsych.ac.uk) — provides a variety of factsheets.
- Sane (www.sane.org.uk) — campaigns to raise mental health awareness and provides emotional support, practical help, and information including online support.
- The Samaritans (www.samaritans.org) — provides a free 24-hour confidential telephone helpline for anyone in a crisis, telephone 116 123. Email is also an available option but response may take several days: jo@samaritans.org.
- Provide information and support for the family members or carers (as appropriate) of the person who has self-harmed. Topics to discuss include:
- The emotional impact on the person and their family members or carers.
- Advice on how to cope when supporting someone who self-harms.
- What to do if the person self-harms again.
- How to seek help for the physical consequences of self-harm.
- How to assist and support the person.
- How to recognise signs that the person may self-harm.
- Steps to reduce the likelihood of self-harm in the future.
- How to address any gambling-related harms, where appropriate.
- Support for families and carers and how to access it.
- The impact of encountering stigma around self-harm.
- Local services and how to get in touch with them, including out-of-hours.
- Local peer support groups, online forums, local and national charities, and how to get in touch with them. For example:
- Royal College of Psychiatrists (www.rcpsych.ac.uk) — has a range of factsheets.
- The Samaritans (www.samaritans.org) — have information for family and friends of people who self-harm, and information on suicide and self-harm for parents.
- YoungMinds (www.youngminds.org.uk) — offers free confidential online and telephone support for parents, telephone 0808 8025544.
- Their right to a formal assessment of their own needs including their physical and mental health (known as a 'carer's assessment'), and how to access this.
- Ensure that information for people who have self-harmed and their family members is:
- Tailored to their individual needs and circumstances, taking into account, for example, whether this is a first presentation or repeat self-harm, the severity and type of self-harm, and if the person has any coexisting health conditions, neurodevelopmental conditions or a learning disability.
- Provided throughout their care.
- Sensitive and empathetic.
- Supportive and respectful.
- Consistent with their care plan, if there is one in place.
- Conveyed in the spirit of hope and optimism.
- Adapted for people who may be subject to discrimination, for example, people who are physically disabled, people with neurodevelopmental conditions or a learning disability, people from underserved groups, people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds and people who are LGBTQ+.
- Provide emotional support and help if necessary to the relatives/carers of people who have self-harmed, as they may also be experiencing high levels of distress and anxiety.
- Arrange for review and follow-up depending on clinical judgement, if the person has ongoing issues that need monitoring and support, maintaining continuity of therapeutic relationships wherever possible. See Scenario: Long term management following an act of self-harm for more information.
- Ensure:
- Continuity of care, wherever possible, in the staff caring for people who have self-harmed by minimising the number of different staff they see.
- The care plans of people who have self-harmed can be accessed by primary and secondary care plus other professionals and practitioners involved in their care.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and prevention of recurrence [NICE, 2022c], supported by evidence from high quality review papers [Clarke, 2019; Knipe, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023], and is what CKS considers good medical practice.
Scenario: Acute management of a person at risk of self-harm
From age 8 years onwards.
How should I manage a person at risk of self-harm?
- Treat the person with respect, dignity and compassion, with an awareness of cultural sensitivity.
- Ensure that a psychosocial assessment has been carried out (referral to specialist mental health services may be appropriate, but if this is not possible or practical, it may be in primary care by a person with appropriate training). Such assessments should incorporate:
- The person's psychosocial needs, including:
- Social needs — home environment, living arrangements, social and family support network, personal relationships, needs of any dependent children, need for social care and support, history leading to the thoughts of self-harm, recent life events and current difficulties, functioning at work and finances, need for occupational rehabilitation, or financial advice).
- Psychological and physical needs — mental health disorders, or misuse of recreational drugs and/or alcohol, physical health problems, personal skills, strengths, assets, coping strategies, and the need for psychological intervention.
- Factors that increase the person's risk, such as:
- Features of depression. For further information, see the CKS topic on Depression.
- Feelings of hopelessness.
- Features that suggest suicidal intent. Always ask people directly about suicidal ideation and intent.
- Consider the history and frequency of any past self-harm, medical seriousness, use of violent methods, evidence of planning such as suicide notes or changes to will, and precautions taken to prevent rescue.
- Other clinical, demographic, and psychological features associated with risk, including male sex; physical health problems; low socioeconomic status; high-risk employment (such as farmers or healthcare professionals); unemployment; bereavement; changes in relationships; social isolation; gambling-related harms, neglectful, abusive, or violent relationships; and access to the means to self-harm (such as a supply of their own or other people in their household's medications, or a firearm).
- For more information on assessing the risk of suicide, see the CKS topic on Depression.
- The person's psychosocial needs, including:
- Identify protective factors that may reduce the person's risk, including coping strategies, supportive relationships, dependent children, and religious beliefs.
- Identify any safeguarding concerns in children, young people, or vulnerable adults:
- Dependent for their care on the person presenting with an episode of self-harm.
- Presenting with an episode of self-harm that may have occurred in response to child maltreatment, domestic violence, or other violence or exploitation. For more information, see the CKS topic on Child maltreatment - recognition and management.
- Where safeguarding concerns are identified, follow local safeguarding procedures.
- Note: For people who repeatedly present at risk of self-harm, ensure that their needs and risk are assessed at each presentation.
- Where assessments of risk and psychosocial needs are carried out in primary care, use clinical judgement depending on the findings of the assessments to determine whether referral is required immediately:
- If there is thought to be an immediate risk of self-harm or suicide — refer to a crisis resolution and home treatment team.
- If there is thought to be a mental health disorder of a nature or severity requiring specialist management, or cognitive impairment, or the person is experiencing high levels of distress, their risk of self-harm is increasing, they are unresponsive to other strategies, they request intervention from specialist services, or there are high levels of distress in family members, carers, or significant others — refer to a community mental health team and/or psychology services. If the person is aged under 18 years, refer them to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).
- If there is misuse of recreational drugs or alcohol — refer to appropriate drug and alcohol services.
- Manage and follow up in primary care people those who decline specialist referral, maintaining continuity of therapeutic relationships wherever possible.
- Offer financial and occupational rehabilitation advice, where appropriate.
- Advise the person to seek further help if their situation deteriorates.
- Manage any identified mental health and other problems that may have been identified as appropriate. For further information, see the CKS topics on Generalized anxiety disorder, Depression, Depression in children, Depression - antenatal and postnatal, Psychosis and schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Dementia, Alcohol - problem drinking, and Opioid dependence.
- When prescribing medicines, take into account:
- The toxicity of the prescribed medicines for people at risk of overdose (for example, opiate-containing painkillers and tricyclic antidepressants).
- Their recreational drug and alcohol consumption, the risk of misuse, and possible interaction with prescribed medicines.
- The person's wider access to medicines prescribed for themselves or others.
- The need for effective communication where multiple prescribers are involved.
- Offer written and verbal information to the person and their family, carers, or significant others. For further details, see the section on follow-up.
- Ensure that all members of the multidisciplinary team including primary care and specialist mental health services are kept informed about the assessment, support, and treatment of any episode where a person presents at risk of self-harm. Ensure that people who do not attend appointments for review in primary care or specialist mental health services are followed up.
- Ensure that any person who presents at risk of self-harm gives informed consent for management, wherever possible.
- If a person declines or refuses management that is perceived to be in their best interests, assess their mental capacity to help decide whether they are unable to make an informed decision about whether to accept or refuse treatment. Mental capacity should be assumed in a person aged 16 years or over, unless there is evidence to the contrary. If possible, gather additional information from family, carers, and significant others, if the person allows.
- If a person refuses treatment, provide information about the potential consequences of not receiving treatment, while trying to gain consent.
- If a person is judged to have diminished capacity and/or the presence of a significant mental health disorder, refer for an urgent mental health assessment or hospital admission, depending on clinical judgement. Healthcare professionals have a duty to act in the person's best interests. This may include taking the person to hospital for further assessment and treatment against their wishes.
- If there is uncertainty about whether a person has capacity to make informed decisions, seek advice from a psychiatrist who has experience in assessing capacity. For more information, see Assessing mental capacity.
- If a person declines or refuses management that is perceived to be in their best interests, assess their mental capacity to help decide whether they are unable to make an informed decision about whether to accept or refuse treatment. Mental capacity should be assumed in a person aged 16 years or over, unless there is evidence to the contrary. If possible, gather additional information from family, carers, and significant others, if the person allows.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and prevention of recurrence [NICE, 2022c], the accompanying commentary New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed [Mughal, 2023], and what CKS considers good medical practice. and what CKS considers good medical practice. While the NICE guideline is intended to inform the management of people following an act of self-harm, CKS pragmatically recommends (based on knowledge of good clinical practice) that the information specifically outlined can also be applied to the management of those at risk of self-harm.
Assessing mental capacity
- The key principles of the Mental Capacity Act derive from the British Medical Association's toolkit The Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) [BMA, 2024b].
- The recommendation to refer the person for an urgent mental health assessment or hospital admission if they are judged to have diminished capacity and/or the presence of a significant mental health disorder is pragmatic advice based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice. CKS acknowledges that diminished capacity may have multiple causes, including drugs, alcohol, and acute delirium, as well as mental health states, such as psychosis, and the person's place of care will depend on the likely underlying cause at the time of presentation.
Capacity and confidentiality issues in young people aged 16–17 years
- The information about capacity and confidentiality issues in young people who self-harm is based on the NICE guideline [NICE, 2022c], and the Care Quality Commission's guidance Brief guide: capacity and competence to consent in under 18s [CQC, 2019], and has been highlighted as this group may have a number of special needs owing to their vulnerability and family circumstances.
The Mental Health Act (1983)
- The information about the Mental Health Act derives from the guideline Reference Guide to the Mental Health Act 1983 produced by the Department of Health and Social Care [DH, 2015].
Scenario: Long-term management following an act of self-harm
From age 8 years onwards.
What long-term management is required for a person who self-harms?
- For people who have previously self-harmed and are at risk of repetition, ensure that a psychosocial assessment has been carried out (this may be by referral to specialist mental health services, but if this is not possible or practical, in primary care by a person with appropriate training).
- Make referral to mental health professionals a priority when:
- The person's levels of concern or distress are rising, high, or sustained.
- The frequency or degree of self-harm or suicidal intent is increasing.
- The person providing assessment in primary care is concerned.
- The person asks for further support from mental health services.
- Levels of distress in family members or carers of children, young people and adults are rising, high, or sustained, despite attempts to help.
- Mental health services (including community mental health teams and liaison psychiatry teams) are usually responsible for the longer-term treatment and management of self-harm. Management may include:
- If stopping self-harm is unrealistic in the short-term, providing information about harm minimization strategies (less destructive or harmful methods of self-injury) as agreed with the multidisciplinary team, such as:
- Distraction or coping strategies.
- Approaches to self-care.
- Wound hygiene and aftercare for self-harm scars.
- Providing factual information on the potential complications.
- The impact of alcohol and recreational drugs on the urge to self-harm.
- Providing psychological interventions if appropriate — for example, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), dialectical behavioural therapy, or problem-solving therapy. This should be tailored to the person's needs and preferences. Pharmacotherapy is unlikely to be helpful.
- Drawing up an individual care plan — goals may include improving social or occupational functioning, improving quality of life, reducing risk-taking behaviour, and managing any associated mental health problems.
- Compiling a crisis plan that outlines self-management strategies, contact numbers and information about what to do and whom to contact in a crisis, if self-management strategies are not helping.
- Ensuring that all members of the multidisciplinary team including primary care are updated about any episodes of self-harm and information held in care and crisis plans, if appropriate. Note: the person should have been made aware that this information may be shared with other healthcare professionals where necessary, for example, if there are serious concerns for the person's safety.
- If stopping self-harm is unrealistic in the short-term, providing information about harm minimization strategies (less destructive or harmful methods of self-injury) as agreed with the multidisciplinary team, such as:
- The roles of a primary care physician may include:
- Management of any identified psychosocial needs, including offering advice and support to facilitate any goals (such as education, employment, and occupation) outlined in the person's care plan.
- Managing any mental health or other problems that have been identified, if appropriate (possibly as part of a shared-care arrangement). For further information, see the CKS topics on Generalized anxiety disorder, Depression, Depression - antenatal and postnatal, Psychosis and schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Dementia, Alcohol - problem drinking, and Opioid dependence.
- Monitoring the person's physical health, including the physical consequences of self-harm as well as other healthcare needs.
- Considering what medicines are prescribed and taking into account:
- The toxicity of the prescribed medicines for people at risk of overdose (for example, opiate-containing painkillers and tricyclic antidepressants).
- The person's recreational drug and alcohol consumption, the risk of misuse, and possible interaction with prescribed medicines.
- The person's wider access to medicines prescribed for themselves or others.
- The need for effective communication where multiple prescribers are involved.
- Offering written and verbal information to the person and their family, carers, or significant others. For further information see the section on follow-up.
- Working cooperatively with secondary health and social care professionals to ensure the routine sharing of up-to-date care and risk management plans.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and prevention of recurrence [NICE, 2022c], is supported by evidence from Cochrane reviews [Witt, 2021a; Witt, 2021b], other high quality review papers [Clarke, 2019; Edriss, 2022; Knipe, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023], and is what CKS considers good medical practice.
Supporting evidence
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Self-harm: assessment, management and prevention of recurrence [NICE, 2022c], is supported by evidence from Cochrane reviews [Witt, 2021a; Witt, 2021b], other high quality review papers [Clarke, 2019; Knipe, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023], and is what CKS considers good medical practice. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of self-harm.
Search dates
January 2020 - July 2024
Key search terms
The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCOhost MEDLINE (searched 17th January 2020). These were combined with filters to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and primary care relevant literature in EBSCOhost MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases.
S3 S1 OR S2
S2 TI ( (self-harm* OR (self N1 harm*) or self-injur* or (self N1 injur*) or self-inflict* OR (self N1 inflict*) or self-mutilat* or (self N1 mutilat*) or self-poison* or (self N1 poison*)) ) OR AB ( (self-harm* OR (self N1 harm*) or self-injur* or (self N1 injur*) or self-inflict* OR (self N1 inflict*) or self-mutilat* or (self N1 mutilat*) or self-poison* or (self N1 poison*)) )
S1 (MH "Self-Injurious Behavior+")
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content, and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations, and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Blanchard, A., Chihuri, S., DiGuiseppi, C.G. and Li, G. (2021) Risk of Self-harm in Children and Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open 4(10), e2130272. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- BMA (2024a) Ethics toolkit: Adults with incapacity, Scotland. British Medical Association. https://www.bma.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- BMA (2024b) Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales). British Medical Association. http://bma.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- BMA (2024c) Ethics toolkit: Mental capacity in Northern Ireland. British Medical Association. http://bma.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2023) Suicide risk mitigation. BMJ Publishing Group. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info
- Clarke, S., Allerhand, L.A. and Berk, M.S. (2019) Recent advances in understanding and managing self-harm in adolescents. F1000 Research 8(Faculty Rev-1794). [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- CQC (2019) Brief guide: capacity and competence to consent in under 18s. Care Quality Commission. https://www.cqc.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- DH (2015) Reference guide for the Mental Health Act 1993. Department of Health. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Edriss, M., Monconduit, R., St Claire, K., et al. (2022) Treatment of Self-Harm Scars: A Scoping Review. Dermatologic Surgery 48(8), 809-814. [Abstract]
- Fenton, C. and Kingsley, E. (2023) Scoping review: Alternatives to self-harm recommended on mental health self-help websites. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 32(1), 76-94. [Abstract]
- Geoffroy, M.C., Bouchard, S., Per, M., et al. (2022) Prevalence of suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviours in children aged 12 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 9(9), 703-714. [Abstract]
- Gulmez, S.E., Larrey, D., Pageaux, G.P., Bernuau, J., Bissoli, F., et al. (2015) Liver transplant associated with paracetamol overdose: results from the seven-country SALT study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 80(3), 599-606. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- HM Government (2024) Mental Health Act 1983. HM Government. https://www.legislation.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Knipe, D., Padmanathan, P., Newton-Howes, G., et al. (2022) Suicide and self-harm. Lancet 399(10338), 1903-1916. [Abstract]
- Lim, K.S., Wong, C.H., McIntyre, R.S., et al. (2019) Global Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of Suicidal Behavior, Deliberate Self-Harm and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Children and Adolescents between 1989 and 2018: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(22), 4581. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- McCabe, A. (2023) Management of self-harm. Emergency Medicine Journal 40(7), 472. [Abstract]
- Mughal, F., Burton, F.M., Fletcher, H., et al. (2023) New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed. British Journal of Psychiatry 223(5), 501-503. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- NHS (2016) Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey: Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, England, 2014. National Health Service (NHS) Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022a) Self-harm (Quality Standard [QS34]). National Institute for Health and care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022b) Suicide prevention (Quality Standard QS 189). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022c) Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2025) Gambling-related harms: identification, assessment and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- ONS (2023) Suicides in England and Wales: 2022 registrations. Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Persano, H.L. (2022) Self-harm. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 103(6), 1089-1103. [Abstract]
- Sabus A, Feinstein J, Romani P, Goldson E, Blackmer A. (2019) Management of Self-injurious Behaviors in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Pharmacotherapy Overview. Pharmacotherapy 39(6), 645-664. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Son, Y., Kim, S. and Lee, J.S. (2021) Self-Injurious Behavior in Community Youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(4), 1955. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Witt, K.G., Hetrick, S.E., Rajaram, G., et al. (2021a) Pharmacological interventions for self‐harm in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- Witt, K.G., Hetrick, S.E., Rajaram, G., et al. (2021b) Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- Wrath, A. J. and Adams, G. C. (2019) Self-Injurious Behaviors and Adult Attachment: A Review of the Literature. Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research 23(4), 527-550. [Abstract]