This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Preventative medicine

Safeguarding adults in care homes

Last revised in January 2022

Safeguarding is the protection of a persons health, wellbeing, and right to live in safety, free from harm, abuse, and neglect

Safeguarding adults in care homes: Summary

  • Safeguarding is defined as the protection of a person’s health, wellbeing, and right to live in safety, free from harm, abuse, and neglect.
    • The local authority is the lead agency for adult safeguarding and should be notified whenever abuse or neglect is suspected.
    • Primary care staff who have regular contact with care home residents are well-placed to identify abuse and neglect in care homes. Each practice should have a GP Safeguarding Lead who can offer advice and guidance.
  • Abuse may consist of a single or repeated act and affect one person or more — it may be physical, verbal, or psychological, an act of neglect or an omission to act.
    • Individual abuse or neglect may be perpetrated by anyone in contact with a care home resident including volunteers, visitors, family members and carers, and care home staff. It can take many forms including physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, financial or material abuse, discriminatory abuse, domestic violence, neglect and acts of omission.
    • Organisational abuse is not directly caused by an individual but occurs due to policies, processes and practices within an organisation. It can affect one person or many residents, range from one-off incidents to on-going ill-treatment and include acts of neglect or omission and poor care practice.
  • Indicators of abuse or neglect are not proof of abuse or neglect on their own but should alert clinicians to follow the safeguarding pathway.
    • The terms 'consider' and 'suspect' are used to define the extent to which an indicator suggests abuse or neglect — 'suspect' indicates a stronger likelihood of abuse or neglect.
  • If a resident is in immediate danger or if there is a risk to other residents:
    • Call 999, provide medical attention if needed, and stay with the resident at risk until help arrives.
    • If a crime is suspected but the situation is not an emergency, encourage and support the resident to report the matter to the police. If they cannot or do not wish to report a suspected crime (for example, because they have been coerced or lack capacity), report the situation to the police yourself.
    • Consider who should immediately be notified and as soon as the resident is safe, follow the steps for suspected abuse or neglect.
  • If individual abuse or neglect is suspected:
    • Once the resident is safe, gather information about the suspected abuse or neglect.
    • Report the suspected abuse or neglect to a senior member of staff and the safeguarding lead as soon as is practical — if you are not confident about reporting within the organisation, contact the local authority.
  • If individual abuse or neglect is considered:
    • Arrange appropriate medical care for the resident at risk (if needed).
    • Record information and seek advice from a safeguarding lead.
  • If organisational abuse or neglect is suspected:
    • Contact the local authority to make an adult safeguarding referral.
  • If organisational abuse or neglect is considered:
    • Raise the matter with the care home manager — if the care home manager is thought to be part of the problem, report to the group manager, regional manager, owner or board of trustees.
    • If the manager agrees to make changes, ensure these happen.
    • If the situation does not improve after taking these steps, make an adult safeguarding referral to the local authority.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 18 years onwards.

This CKS topics covers keeping adults in care homes safe from abuse and neglect. It includes potential indicators of abuse and neglect by individuals or organisations, and covers the safeguarding process from when a concern is first identified through to safeguarding enquiries.

The recommendations in this topic are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes [NG189] which is underpinned by the Care Act 2014, the Care Act 2014 statutory guidance, and the Making Safeguarding Personal framework.  This topic does not cover in any detail adult safeguarding legislation or procedure in Northern Ireland, Scotland, or Wales.

There are separate CKS topics on Child maltreatment - recognition and management, and Dementia.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

November 2021 to January 2022 — this is a new CKS topic. A literature search was conducted in October 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 October 2021.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 October 2021.

Economic Appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 October 2021.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 October 2021.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 October 2021.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 October 2021.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 October 2021.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 October 2021.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary health care professionals to:

  • Support safe care for adults in care homes.
  • Recognise potential indicators of individual or organisational abuse and neglect of adults in care homes.
  • Understand the safeguarding process from initial identification of a concern through to safeguarding enquiries including how to raise a concern about suspected abuse or neglect.
  • Support adults at risk in care homes through the safeguarding process.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP — Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is safeguarding adults?

  • Safeguarding is defined as the protection of a person’s health, wellbeing, and right to live in safety, free from harm, abuse, and neglect.
    • The term ‘Safeguarding Adults’ refers to all work done to help adults with care and support needs stay safe from abuse and neglect — it replaces the term “adult protection”.
  • Effective safeguarding relies on individuals and organisations working together to:
    • Promote wellbeing, prevent harm and reduce the risk of abuse or neglect to adults with care and support needs.
    • Safeguard adults in a way that supports them in making choices and having control about how they want to live.
    • Provide information and support in accessible ways to help people understand the different types of abuse, how to stay safe and what to do to raise a concern about the safety or well-being of an adult.
    • Raise public awareness that ‘safeguarding is everybody’s business’ so that communities as a whole, alongside professionals, play their part in preventing, identifying and responding to abuse and neglect.
    • Stop abuse or neglect wherever possible and ensure the safety and wellbeing of anyone who has been subject to abuse or neglect.
    • Address what has caused the abuse or neglect and take action against those responsible.
    • Learn lessons and implement changes that could prevent similar abuse or neglect happening to other people.
  • The definition of an ‘adult at risk’ varies between the UK nations. The Care Act 2014 states that adult safeguarding duties apply to any person aged 18 years or older who:
    • Has care and support needs.
    • Is experiencing, or is at risk of, abuse or neglect.
    • Is unable to protect themselves because of their care and support needs.

[; Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); Care Quality Commission (CQC), 2018; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2018; Johnson, 2019; Local Government Association, 2019; AgeUK, 2020; CQC, 2021a; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021]

Who is involved in safeguarding adults in care homes?

Safeguarding is ‘everybody’s business’ - effective safeguarding relies on individuals and organisations working together including:

  • Local authorities
    • The local authority is the lead agency for adult safeguarding and should be notified whenever abuse or neglect is suspected. They will decide whether a safeguarding enquiry is necessary, and if so who will conduct it.
  • Safeguarding Adults Boards
    • The Care Act 2014 requires that each local authority must set up a Safeguarding Adults Board.
    • The Safeguarding Adults Board must:
      • Include the local authority, the NHS and the police — these agencies should meet regularly to discuss and act upon local safeguarding issues.
      • Develop shared plans for safeguarding working with local people to decide how best to protect adults in vulnerable situations.
      • Publish this safeguarding plan and report to the public annually on progress, to help ensure all organisations are working together in the best way.
  • Care Quality Commission (CQC)
    • In England, care homes are regulated and inspected by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to ensure that they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety.
    • Latest inspection reports and ratings for each care home can be found on the CQC website. 
  • Care homes and care home providers
    • There are around 10,500 residential care homes and 4,200 nursing homes in England — these provide support to around 410,000 older people (as estimated by the 2017 Competition and Markets Authority care homes market study), and to many younger adults with disabilities, mental health issues or complex support needs.
    • In addition to long term residential care, care homes may also provide services, sometimes known as ‘respite care’, for people who stay for shorter periods of time, including day visitors.
    • It is a statutory requirement for care homes to have a designated safeguarding lead who has had training in safeguarding, and has the relevant skills and competencies to ensure the safety and protection of residents, in line with CQC guidance.
  • Health and social care staff
    • All staff working within health and social care services (for example in hospitals, primary care, dental practices, and pharmacies) should be fully aware of their safeguarding roles and responsibilities.
    • Primary care staff often have regular contact with care home residents and are therefore well-placed to identify abuse and neglect. Each practice should have a GP Safeguarding Lead who is available to offer advice and guidance to colleagues on safeguarding concerns and support staff involved in safeguarding cases.
  • Volunteers, residents, family, friends and any other visitors to the care home
    • All care home staff, residents and members of the public have a vital role in safeguarding and should be supported to remain vigilant for and report any concerns about abuse or neglect.
    • Information should be provided in easily accessible ways to help people understand the different types of abuse, how to stay safe and what to do to raise a concern about the safety or well-being of an adult.
  • Police services
    • The police are a key safeguarding partner.
    • In emergency situations (if there are concerns that an adult is at immediate risk of serious harm) they have powers to intervene to provide immediate assistance due to a health condition, injury or other life-threatening situation.
    • In non-emergency situations, decisions on when to involve the police depend on a number of factors including:
      • The views and wishes of the adult at risk.
      • Whether a criminal offence as defined by law has been disclosed.
      • The exact circumstances surrounding each individual case of suspected abuse or neglect.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); Department of Health and Social Care, 2016; Manthorpe, 2017; NHS, 2017,; Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), 2017; AgeUK, 2020; CQC, 2021b; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; NICE, 2021]

What is the importance of multi-agency working and shared learning?

  • A common theme in Serious Case Reviews for adults has been that information about poor and dangerous services was not collated or linked with other information so that intervention might have taken place before serious harm or death occurred.
    • Early sharing of information is the key to providing an effective response where there are emerging concerns — local partnerships must have effective procedures for sharing information and means of communication in place to intervene before a problem becomes a crisis.
  • Care homes, local authorities, clinical commissioning groups and other local agencies should:
    • Work together to establish local strategic partnership arrangements that cover safeguarding adults in care homes, and they specifically include:
      • Information sharing and communication protocols.
      • Roles, responsibilities and accountability for safeguarding within each organisation.
      • Procedures for raising and managing a safeguarding concern, the decision-making process and the procedure for enquiries.
      • Definitions of good practice and poor practice.
      • The indicators of abuse and neglect that should result in safeguarding action.
  • Local health, social care and other practitioners working with care homes should:
    • Use a multi-agency approach to safeguarding, bringing together a wide range of skills and expertise to keep residents safe. 
  • Care home managers and providers should:
    • Be aware that some staff may be apprehensive about external oversight, and may need time to build relationships with external agencies before effective multi-agency working and shared learning can take place.
    • Participate in local Safeguarding Adults Board arrangements for sharing experiences about managing safeguarding concerns in care homes.
    • Share relevant information from Safeguarding Adults Board meeting minutes and reports with their staff.

[CQC, 2021a; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; NICE, 2021]

What is a safeguarding enquiry?

  • A safeguarding enquiry is any action taken (or instigated) by a local authority (under Section 42 of the Care Act 2014) when there is reasonable cause to suspect that an adult at risk is experiencing, or at risk of, abuse or neglect.
    • The particular circumstances of each individual case determine the scope of each enquiry, as well as who leads it and the form it takes.
    • Enquiries can range from a conversation with the adult concerned (or with their representative or advocate) through to a formal multi-agency plan to ensure the wellbeing of the adult concerned.
    • The local authority will decide which individuals and organisations need to be informed or consulted during the safeguarding enquiry for example:
      • The resident.
      • Their family and carers.
      • Anyone holding lasting power of attorney for the resident.
      • The care home and care home provider.
      • Advocacy organisations.
      • Voluntary organisations.
      • The police.
      • The organisation commissioning care.
      • The Office of the Public Guardian — if the safeguarding concern relates to lasting power of attorney.
      • The Department for Work and Pensions — if the safeguarding concern relates to an appointee for the resident's benefits.
      • Specialist helplines or online support, for advice and information.
      • GPs or other healthcare professionals.
      • The Care Quality Commission or other regulators.
      • Banks — if the safeguarding concern relates to financial abuse. 
  • For more information about conducting a section 42 safeguarding enquiry see the Making Safeguarding Personal framework.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); Gibson, 2016; Johnson, 2019; NICE, 2021]

What is a Safeguarding Adults Review?

  • Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs) are a statutory requirement for Safeguarding Adults Boards with the purpose of promoting learning and improving safeguarding practice.
  • A Safeguarding Adults review must be arranged by a Safeguarding Adults Board if:
    • There is reasonable cause for concern that partner agencies could have worked more effectively to protect an adult and,
    • Serious abuse or neglect is known or suspected and,
    • Certain conditions are met, in line with section 44 of the Care Act 2014 and related statutory guidance.

[NICE, 2021]

What is a Safeguarding Adults Board?

  • The Care Act 2014 requires that each local authority must set up a Safeguarding Adults Board.
  • The Safeguarding Adults Board must:
    • Include the local authority, the NHS and the police — these agencies should meet regularly to discuss and act upon local safeguarding issues.
    • Develop shared plans for safeguarding working with local people to decide how best to protect adults in vulnerable situations.
    • Publish this safeguarding plan and report to the public annually on progress, to help ensure all organisations are working together in the best way.

[Department of Health and Social Care, 2016; AgeUK, 2020]

What legislation relates to adult safeguarding in the UK?

Safeguarding law and practice differs across the UK — primary care clinicians should be familiar with local procedures and always work within the framework of the relevant local authorities safeguarding policy and procedure.

  • England — all adult safeguarding in England, including safeguarding in care homes, should be underpinned by:
    • The Care Act 2014.
    • The Care Act 2014 statutory guidance — any actions taken in relation to a safeguarding concern should be based on the 6 principles set out in the Care Act statutory guidance. These principles should be known and understood by everyone working in care homes and should be part of their everyday practice:
      • Empowerment: People being supported and encouraged to make their own decisions and informed consent.
      • Prevention: It is better to take action before harm occurs.
      • Proportionality: The least intrusive response appropriate to the risk presented.
      • Protection: Support and representation for those in greatest need.
      • Partnerships: Local solutions through services working with their communities. Communities have a part to play in preventing, detecting and reporting neglect and abuse.
      • Accountability: Accountability and transparency in delivering safeguarding.
    • The Making Safeguarding Personal framework.
      • Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP), is a sector-led safeguarding initiative focused on taking into account the needs, goals and wishes of the adult at risk when taking safeguarding actions.
    • Other legislation and guidance relevant to adult safeguarding includes the Mental Health Acts 1983 and 2007, the Health and Social Care Act 2008, the Human Rights Act 1998, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019.
  • Wales
  • Scotland
  • Northern Ireland

[Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; GMC, 2021; NICE, 2021]

What is abuse and neglect?

  • Abuse may consist of a single or repeated act and affect one person or more — it may be physical, verbal or psychological, an act of neglect or an omission to act.
  • Individual abuse or neglect:
    • May be perpetrated by anyone in contact with a care home resident including volunteers, visitors, family members and carers, and care home staff.
    • Can take many forms including physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, financial or material abuse, discriminatory abuse, domestic violence, neglect and acts of omission.
    • For more information, see the section on Individual abuse or neglect.
  • Organisational abuse or neglect
    • Organisational abuse (also known as institutional abuse) is not directly caused by individual action or inaction — it occurs as a consequence of the structure, policies, processes and practices within an organisation.
    • Organisational abuse can affect one person or many residents, range from one-off incidents to on-going ill-treatment and includes acts of neglect or omission and poor care practice within an institution or specific care setting (such as a hospital or care home).
    • For more information, see the section on Organisational abuse.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); AgeUK, 2020; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; NICE, 2021]

What is individual abuse or neglect?

Individual abuse or neglect includes:

  • Physical abuse:
    • Includes assault, hitting, slapping, pushing, misuse of medication, restraint, and inappropriate physical sanctions.
  • Sexual abuse:
    • Includes rape, indecent exposure, sexual harassment, inappropriate looking or touching, sexual teasing or innuendo, sexual photography, subjection to pornography or witnessing sexual acts, indecent exposure, sexual assault, sexual acts to which the adult has not consented or was pressured into consenting.
  • Psychological abuse:
    • Includes emotional abuse, threats of harm or abandonment, deprivation of contact, humiliation, blaming, controlling, intimidation, coercion, harassment, verbal abuse, cyber bullying, isolation, unreasonable and unjustified withdrawal of services or supportive networks.
  • Financial or material abuse:
    • Includes theft, fraud, internet scamming, coercion in relation to an adult’s financial affairs or arrangements, including in connection with wills, property, inheritance or financial transactions, the misuse or misappropriation of property, possessions or benefits.
  • Discriminatory abuse:
    • Includes forms of harassment, slurs or similar treatment: because of race, gender and gender identity, age, disability, sexual orientation or religion.
  • Domestic violence:
    • Includes any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between people aged 16 or over who are, or have been, intimate partners or family members regardless of gender or sexuality.
    • Includes psychological, physical, sexual, financial, emotional abuse, or so called ‘honour’ based violence and can in some cases be a continuation of past relationships of domestic violence or abuse.
  • Neglect and acts of omission:
    • Include the refusal of or failure to fulfil a caregiving obligation for example ignoring medical, emotional or physical care needs, failure to provide access to appropriate health, care and support or educational services, the withholding of the necessities of life, such as medication, adequate nutrition and heating.
    • May or may not involve a conscious and intentional attempt to inflict physical or emotional distress on the person at risk.
  • Self-neglect
    • Self-neglect describes a wide range of behaviours where a person neglects to care for their personal hygiene, health or surroundings.
    • Self-neglect can be challenging to address because of the need to find the right balance between respecting a person's autonomy and fulfilling a duty of care to protect their health and wellbeing.
    • When considering if a safeguarding response is required it is essential to establish if the person has capacity to make decisions about their own wellbeing, and if they are able or willing to care for themselves — adults who are able to make choices may make decisions that others think of as self-neglect.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, (2015 updated 2021); Storey, 2020; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; NICE, 2021]

What is organisational abuse or neglect?

  • Organisational abuse (also known as institutional abuse):
    • Includes acts of neglect or omission and poor care practice within an institution or specific care setting such as a care home.
    • May range from one off incidents to on-going ill-treatment through neglect or poor professional practice as a result of the structure, policies, processes and practices within an organisation.
    • Some aspects of organisational abuse may be hidden (closed cultures), and staff may act differently when visitors are there (disguised compliance).
    • It can be difficult to differentiate between poor practice and ongoing organisational abuse.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); AgeUK, 2020; Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021; NICE, 2021]

How common is abuse or neglect in care homes?

  • Many care homes provide good quality care but this is not always the case:
    • The Care Quality Commission's report 2020/21 rated care homes as:
      • Inadequate for 1% of residential homes and 2% of nursing homes.
      • Requiring improvement for 14% of residential homes and 20% of nursing homes.
      • Good for 81% of residential homes and 73% of nursing homes.
      • Outstanding for 4% of residential homes and 5% of nursing homes.
    • The Safeguarding Adults 2019 Annual Report found that residential and nursing care homes accounted for 34% of all safeguarding enquiries conducted under section 42 of the Care Act 2014.
  • Reported prevalence of abuse and neglect in care homes varies widely in the literature:
    • A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of elder abuse in long-term care settings found that [Yon, 2019]:
      • Overall 64.2% (4 studies, n=1405) of staff reported that they had perpetrated or directed abusive acts against residents over the past year — psychological abuse (32.5%, 5 studies, n=2706), neglect (12.0%, 4 studies, n=2106) and physical abuse (9.3%, 5 studies, n=2711) had the highest prevalence.
      • 33.4% (3 studies, n=694) of residents reported that they had experienced psychological abuse over the past year, 14.1% reported physical abuse (4 studies, n=718), 13.8% reported financial abuse (3 studies, n=263), 11.6% reported neglect (3 studies, n=658), and 1.9% reported sexual abuse (3 studies, n=569).
    • A national survey of staff-resident interactions and conflicts in residential care settings in Ireland [Drennan, 2012] found that 57.5% (n=1,316) staff had observed one or more abusive behaviours from a colleague in the previous year.
      • Neglect and psychological abuse were the most commonly observed abusive behaviours.
      • The most frequent neglectful behaviours observed were ignoring a resident when they called (52%) and not bringing a resident to the toilet when they asked (40.4%).
      • Approximately a quarter (26.9%) of staff had observed at least one psychologically abusive act directed towards a resident in the past year — the most frequently observed type of psychological abuse was shouting at a resident in anger (21.1%).
  • Resident to resident abuse may also occur:
    • A one month observational prevalence study of 10 New York state nursing homes (n=2,011) found that 20.2% of residents reported having experienced at least one incident of resident to resident mistreatment —  the most common forms were verbal abuse (9.1% [CI, 7.7% to 10.8%]), other mistreatment (such as invasion of privacy or menacing gestures) (5.3% [CI, 4.4% to 6.4%]), physical abuse (5.2% [CI, 4.1% to 6.5%]), and sexual abuse (0.6% [CI, 0.3% to 1.1%]) [Lachs, 2016].

 [; NICE, 2021] 

Safeguarding policy and procedure

For information on safeguarding policy and procedure in:

 

Safeguarding policy and procedure in care homes

  • All care homes and care home providers must:
    • Have clearly written and easily accessible safeguarding policy and procedure that:
      • Meets the requirements of the Care Act 2014 and the Care Act 2014 statutory guidance.
      • Includes clear arrangements for identifying, reporting, responding to and managing safeguarding concerns.
      • Is based on the principle of collaborative working (including residents, staff, visitors and service providers) because safeguarding is everyone's responsibility.
      • Follows local safeguarding arrangements (overseen by the local Safeguarding Adults Board).
    • Have systems in place:
      • To track and monitor incidents, accidents, disciplinary action, complaints and safeguarding concerns, to identify patterns of potential harm.
      • For preserving evidence from reported safeguarding concerns, including care records, as these may be required in future, for example for local authority enquiries or police investigations.
    • Have a procedure for recording and sharing information (in line with data protection laws) about safeguarding concerns.
    • Have a whistleblowing policy and procedure, and make sure that staff and volunteers are aware of how to report a whistleblowing concern.
      • Whistle-blowing is the act of reporting a concern about safety, malpractice or wrongdoing within an organization to formal authorities.
      • The whistleblowing process must specify who people can contact, and how (for example a senior contact within a care home group, the local authority or the Care Quality Commission).
      • Care homes and care home providers must ensure that whistleblowers are not victimised and do not face negative consequences for reporting or disclosing a safeguarding concern — whistleblowers are protected by law.
      • Primary care staff should be aware that care home staff and volunteers may be afraid of the repercussions of whistleblowing, and this can prevent them from identifying and reporting abuse and neglect.
      • For more information, see the Care Quality Commission guidance on whistleblowing.

[NICE, 2021]

What are the safeguarding roles and responsibilities of care homes?

  • Care homes and care home providers should:
    • Have a safeguarding lead and ensure everyone knows who this is, what they do, how to contact them, and who to speak to if they are unavailable.
    • Make it clear who is accountable for different aspects of safeguarding within the home, in addition to the roles and responsibilities of the safeguarding lead.
    • Include safeguarding responsibilities in the job description of all care home staff, including at board level.
    • Ensure that all staff understand how to meet their safeguarding responsibilities in their day-to-day work within the care home:
      • All directly employed staff working in care homes should read and understand the safeguarding policy and procedure during their induction and complete mandatory training on safeguarding as soon as possible, and no later than 6 weeks after they start.
      • Agency staff working at the home must have completed the necessary safeguarding training for their role, and understand the local safeguarding policy and procedure.
      • Care home managers should assess staff safeguarding knowledge annually, and run refresher training if needed.
      • Care home staff should be given protected time for induction and mandatory safeguarding training.
      • Care home managers should assess staff understanding of safeguarding to identify areas for improvement, help staff to understand the indicators of abuse and neglect enabling them to identify safeguarding concerns more accurately and promote staff confidence in managing safeguarding concerns.
    • Maintain and regularly audit care records (in addition to external checks, such as audits or Care Quality Commission inspections) and ensure that they are complete and available if a safeguarding concern is raised.

[NICE, 2021]

What safeguarding adults training is required in care homes?

  • At a minimum, mandatory safeguarding training should include:
    • Safeguarding and legal principles under the Care Act 2014.
    • The 6 core principles of safeguarding and the Making Safeguarding Personal framework.
    • Specific responsibilities and accountabilities for safeguarding in the care home.
    • How to recognise different forms of abuse and neglect, including organisational abuse and neglect.
    • How to understand the differences between poor practice and abuse and neglect.
    • The care homes whistleblowing policy and procedure, including what support and information is available in this situation.
    • How to act on and report suspected abuse or neglect.
    • How to deal with and preserve evidence.
    • How to raise safeguarding concerns within the care home and how the care home should respond.
    • How to escalate concerns (for example, to appropriate helplines or the local authority) if staff feel that the response taken was not appropriate or effective, or if the concern relates to the actions of the care home manager.
    • Confidentiality and data protection.
    • The importance of being open and honest when things go wrong (the duty of candour).
    • Duties under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.
    • Other training that is needed, based on the staff member's role and their specific safeguarding responsibilities.
  • Mandatory safeguarding training should include:
    • Reflective learning at the individual, team and organisational level, and include opportunities for problem solving.
    • An explanation of safeguarding concepts and terminology, including translations of specific terminology if needed (to ensure that training is accessible to all staff).
  • Further training could cover:
    • How to ask about abuse and neglect in a sensitive and non-judgemental manner.
    • How frequently to assess and ask about abuse and neglect.
    • The wide range of situations and circumstances in which abuse and neglect can potentially occur.
    • Less obvious indicators of abuse and neglect, and more complex safeguarding concerns (for example organisational abuse and neglect).
    • Risk assessments and their relationship to safeguarding.
    • The skills needed to support a resident through a safeguarding enquiry.

[NICE, 2021]

How can supervision of staff in care homes improve safeguarding practice?

  • Be aware that staff may be reluctant to challenge poor practice or raise concerns about potential abuse or neglect, particularly if they feel isolated or unsupported.
  • Care home managers and supervisors should promote reflective supervision to help staff understand how to identify and respond to potential abuse and neglect in care homes and consider making this independent of line management.
  • Line managers should provide feedback (through supervision and appraisals) acknowledging how staff have learned from their experience of identifying, reporting and managing safeguarding concerns.
  • Care home managers should encourage staff to discuss care home culture, learning and management in relation to safeguarding (e.g. in exit interviews) when leaving employment with the care home.
  • Be aware of the potential for under-reporting of safeguarding concerns by staff who may be afraid of losing their job (for example staff who have their housing or work permit linked specifically to their current role).

[NICE, 2021]

Care home culture

  • Care home providers (including trustees and company directors) and managers should:
    • Promote a culture in which safeguarding is openly discussed and abuse and neglect can be readily reported.
    • Ensure that support is readily available for people raising concerns, for example, by appointing safeguarding champions. 
      • Safeguarding champions are staff who already work within the care home, have a good knowledge of safeguarding policy and procedure, help ensure that procedures are followed and are available for discussion. They may also offer practical and emotional support to those worried about the impact of raising concerns.
      • Safeguarding champions are not a replacement or alternative to the safeguarding lead.
  • Care home staff should:
    • Be encouraged to watch out for changes in the mood and behaviour of residents, because this might indicate abuse or neglect. 
    • Record and share relevant and important information about changes in mood or behaviour or other issues of concern in a timely manner (for example, at every shift handover or transfer of care).
  • Care home managers should:
    • Make sure there are regular opportunities (for example in team meetings or one-to-one supervision) for all staff to:
      • Share best practice in safeguarding, including learning from Safeguarding Adults Reviews.
      • Challenge poor practice or discuss uncertainty around practice.
      • Discuss the differences between poor practice (which is not necessarily a safeguarding issue) and abuse or neglect (which are safeguarding issues).
    • Make particular efforts to involve staff who work alone or who get very little direct oversight (for example night staff). 
    • Aim to build an emotionally ‘safe’, supportive relationship with the people they supervise, so that difficult decisions are fully discussed and all staff are able to seek advice.
    • Ask for feedback about safeguarding from residents (and their families, friends and carers) and other people working in care homes, for example:
      • About experiences of safeguarding concerns and how these have been identified, reported, managed and resolved.
    • Respond to feedback and inform people about any changes made in response to their comments. 

[NICE, 2021]

Local authorities and commissioning groups

  • Local authorities and other commissioners should ensure that all care homes they work with are fulfilling their statutory and contractual safeguarding responsibilities.
  • Commissioners should:
    • Contribute to improving safeguarding practice in the care homes they work with, by sharing key messages from Safeguarding Adults Reviews and helping care homes to learn from their own experience of managing safeguarding concerns.
    • Ensure that care homes are maintaining records about safeguarding.
    • Make record-keeping responsibilities clear as part of contract management.

[NICE, 2021]

Indicators of abuse and neglect

What are indicators of abuse and neglect?

  • Be aware that:
    • Abuse may be perpetrated by anyone in contact with a care home resident including volunteers, visitors, and family members and carers, as well care home staff.
    • Indicators are not proof of abuse or neglect on their own, however, they should alert clinicians to follow the safeguarding pathway detailed in the Management section.
  • The terms 'consider' and 'suspect' are used to define the extent to which an indicator suggests abuse or neglect — 'suspect' indicates a stronger likelihood of abuse or neglect.
    • To 'consider' abuse or neglect means that this is one possible explanation for the indicator.
    • To 'suspect' abuse or neglect means a serious level of concern about the possibility of abuse or neglect.
    • If multiple indicators are present and at least one is a 'suspect' indicator, you should suspect abuse or neglect and take immediate action.
    • If you are not sure if an indicator is a 'consider' or a 'suspect' indicator:
      • Discuss with your safeguarding lead and/or
      • Seek further advice from the local authority about whether to make a safeguarding referral.
  • For information on indicators of individual abuse or neglect see the sections on:
  • For information on indicators of organisational abuse or neglect see the section on:

What are the indicators of  neglect?

  • Suspect neglect when residents:
    • Do not have an agreed care and support plan.
    • Are not receiving the care in their agreed care and support plan.
    • Have deteriorating physical or mental health or mental capacity, and there is a lack of response to this from staff.
    • Live in a dirty, unhygienic or smelly environment.
    • Repeatedly have poor personal hygiene or are wearing soiled or dirty clothes.
    • Are malnourished.
    • Are frequently and uncharacteristically not engaging with other people, or in activities that are meaningful for them.
    • Have only inconsistent or reluctant contact with external health and social care organisations.
    • Have restricted access to food or drink, if this is not part of their agreed care and support plan.
    • Are not kept safe from everyday hazards or dangerous situations.
    • Repeatedly do not receive prescribed medication, or medication has been repeatedly administered incorrectly (for example the dose, timing, method, or type of medication).
    • Are denied communication or independence aids (such as hearing aids, glasses or dentures), contrary to their care and support plan.
  • Consider neglect when residents:
    • Are not supported to present themselves the way they would like (for example haircuts, makeup, fingernails and oral hygiene and care).
    • Are given someone else's clothes to wear.
    • Occasionally have poor personal hygiene or are wearing dirty clothes.
    • Are wearing clothing that is unsuitable for the temperature or the environment.
    • Have lost or gained weight unintentionally.
    • Do not have access to food and drink in line with their dietary needs.
    • Have repeated urinary tract infections.
    • Are not getting care to protect their skin integrity, potentially leading to pressure ulcers.
      • It can be challenging to identify whether pressure ulcers are caused by poor care or avoidable neglect or the unavoidable result of a person’s current condition.
      • Risk factors for each person should be considered on an individual basis — for more information, see the NICE guideline on pressure ulcers, and the quick guide on preventing pressure ulcers in care homes.
    • Do not have opportunities to spend time with other people, either virtually or in person.
    • Uncharacteristically refuse or are reluctant to engage in social interaction.
    • Do not have opportunities to do activities that are meaningful to them.
    • Do not have access to medical and dental care.
    • Are occasionally denied access to communication and independence aids (such as hearing aids) contrary to their care and support plan.
    • Have not received prescribed medication, or medication has been administered incorrectly (for example, the wrong dose, timing, method, or type of medication).
    • Do not have access to outdoor space, fresh air and sunlight.
    • Are not given first aid when needed.

Self -neglect

  • The Care Act 2014 statutory guidance includes self-neglect in the categories of abuse or neglect relevant to safeguarding adults with care and support needs.
    • Self-neglect describes a wide range of behaviour where a person neglects to care for their personal hygiene, health or surroundings.
    • Self-neglect can be complex and challenging to address, because of the need to find the right balance between respecting a person's autonomy and protecting their health and wellbeing.
  • When considering if a safeguarding response is required, an assessment should be carried out to determine if the person has capacity to make decisions about their own wellbeing, and if they are able or willing to care for themselves.
    • Be aware that adults who are able to make choices may make decisions that others think of as self-neglect.
  • When considering capacity, have a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act and put into practice its five key principles:
    • Assume that a person has capacity to make decisions, unless there is evidence otherwise.
    • Do all you can to maximise a person’s capacity.
    • Unwise or eccentric decisions do not in themselves prove lack of capacity.
    • If you are making a decision for or about a person who lacks capacity, act in their best interests
    • Look for the least restrictive option that will meet the need.
  • Where there is a serious risk to the health and wellbeing of a person, it may be appropriate to raise self-neglect as a safeguarding concern. However, interventions on self-neglect may be more appropriate under the parts of the Care Act which deal with assessment, planning, information and advice, and prevention.

What are the indicators of physical abuse?

  • Act immediately to safeguard residents and contact the police if you witness an assault or are told that a resident has been assaulted.
  • Be aware that injuries can be caused by other residents.
  • Suspect physical abuse when residents:
    • Have multiple or repeated marks or injuries (for example, bruising, cuts, lesions, loss of hair in clumps, bald patches, burns and scalds).
    • Have injuries that are very unlikely to be accidental (for example, grip marks, cigarette burns or strangulation marks).
    • Are being restrained without authorisation (either by direct restraint or by being confined to a particular area).
    • Flinch when approached, or change their behaviour (for example, acting subdued) in the presence of a particular person.
    • Have fractures that cannot be explained.
    • Have their activity limited by misuse of medication, or covert administration when not medically authorised.
  • Consider physical abuse when residents:
    • Have unexplained marks or injuries (for example, minor bruising, cuts, abrasions or reddened skin).
    • Tell you or show signs that they are in pain, and the cause is unexplained (for example, the pain is not caused by a pre-existing medical condition).

What are the indicators of sexual abuse?

  • Be aware that residents have the right to engage in sexual activity if they have the mental capacity to consent. For more information, see:
  • Suspect sexual abuse:
    • If a resident has an intimate relationship with a member of staff.
    • When residents who lack capacity to consent to intimate or sexual relationships:
      • Report being inappropriately touched or experience unwanted sexualised behaviours.
      • Have unexplainable physical symptoms that may be associated with sexual activity, such as itching, bleeding or bruising to the genitals, anal area or inner thighs.
      • Have unexplained bodily fluids on their underwear, clothing or bedding.
      • Are involved in a sexual act with another person, including their husband, wife, partner or another resident.
      • Have a sexually transmitted infection.
      • Become pregnant.
  • Consider sexual abuse when residents:
    • Are spoken to or referred to using sexualised language.
    • Experience any instances of sexualised behaviour or teasing.
    • Show unexplained changes in their behaviour, such as:
      • Resisting being touched.
      • Becoming aggressive or withdrawn.
      • Having trouble sleeping.
      • Using sexualised language.
      • Showing highly sexualised behaviours.
    • Show changes in their relationships (for example, being afraid of or avoiding particular residents, family members or members of staff).

What are the indicators of psychological abuse?

  • Suspect psychological abuse when residents are:
    • Repeatedly addressed rudely or inappropriately (verbally or non-verbally).
    • Shouted at or verbally threatened.
    • Repeatedly humiliated, belittled, or have their opinions or beliefs undermined.
    • Getting married or entering a civil partnership, if you are concerned that they have not consented or lack capacity to consent to this.
    • Denied access to independent advocacy.
    • Repeatedly denied choices (for example, around their activities of daily living or freedom of movement).
  • Consider psychological abuse when residents:
    • Are addressed rudely or inappropriately on any occasion (verbally or non-verbally).
    • Are prevented from speaking freely.
    • Are deliberately and systematically isolated by other residents and/or staff.
    • Have information about their own care systematically withheld from them by the care home.
    • Are not involved in planning their own care, or when changes are made to their care without discussion or agreement.
    • Are denied a choice on any occasion (for example, around activities of daily living or freedom of movement).
    • Are denied unsupervised access to others.
    • Show significant and otherwise unexplainable changes in their behaviour, including:
      • Becoming withdrawn.
      • Avoiding or being afraid of particular individuals.
      • Being too eager to do anything they are asked.
      • Compulsive behaviour.
      • Not being able to do things they used to be able to do.
      • Not being able to concentrate or focus.

What are the indicators of financial and material abuse?

  • Be aware that not having systems to take care of residents' money and possessions is a form of organisational abuse and can lead to financial abuse.
  • Suspect financial and material abuse when residents:
    • Have their money spent or their possessions or property used by other people, in a way that does not appear to benefit the resident (for example, their personal allowance being used to fund staff gifts, or misuse of loyalty card points).
    • Have treasured personal items constantly go missing.
    • Get married or enter a civil partnership, if they are likely to lack capacity to consent to this.
    • Change a will under duress or coercion.
    • Sign a lasting power of attorney when they do not have the mental capacity to make this decision.
    • Personal financial information is not kept confidential.
  • Consider financial and material abuse when residents:
    • Do not have their money or possessions appropriately recorded by the care home.
    • Lose money or possessions.
    • Do not have access to their money, or to possessions that they want or need.
    • Are not routinely involved in decisions about how their money is spent (for example if they do not get a personal allowance), or how their possessions are used.
    • Appear to have bought things they do not need or invested money in things where they may lack capacity to make informed decisions.
    • Find the person managing their financial affairs to be evasive or uncooperative.
    • Family or others show unusual interest in their assets.
    • Have unusual difficulty with their finances, and are uncharacteristically protective of money and things they own.

What are the indicators of discriminatory abuse?

  • Suspect discriminatory abuse when residents:
    • Are not treated equitably and do not have equal access to available services
    • Experience humiliation, violence or threatening behaviour related to protected characteristics:
      • Protected characteristics (Equality Act 2010) include age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation.
      • For more information see the Equality Act 2010. 
    • Are not provided with the support they need, for example, relating to their religious or cultural beliefs.
    • Are denied access to independent advocacy.
    • Show any of the indicators of psychological abuse, if these are associated with protected characteristics.
  • Consider discriminatory abuse when residents:
    • Are denied choices about the care and support that they receive.
    • Are receiving care and support that does not take account of their personal or cultural needs, or other needs associated with protected characteristics.
    • Show any indicators of psychological abuse, if these are associated with protected characteristics.

What are the indicators of organisational abuse or neglect?

 

  • Suspect organisational abuse when:
    • Incidents of abuse or neglect are not reported, or there is evidence of incidents being deliberately not reported.
    • There is evidence of redacted, falsified, missing or incomplete records.
    • There have been multiple hospital admissions of residents, resulting in safeguarding enquiries.
    • There are repeated cases of residents not having access to nursing, medical or dental care.
    • There is frequent, unexplained deterioration in residents' health and wellbeing.
    • Residents' money is being misused by the care home (for example, to purchase gifts for staff or other residents without permission).
    • There is a sudden increase in safeguarding concerns in which abuse or neglect has been identified.
    • Residents are repeatedly evicted or threatened with eviction after making complaints.
    • Repeated instances of residents, families and carers feeling victimised if they raise safeguarding concerns.
    • The care home fails to improve or respond to actions or recommendations in local inspections or audit frameworks from clinical commissioning groups or the local authority, or reviews and inspections by the Care Quality Commission or Healthwatch, and deteriorates over time.
  • Consider organisational abuse when:
    • There is a lack of safeguarding policy, procedure, accountability or governance for example:
      • Safeguarding leadership or governance arrangements are unclear (for example, there is no registered manager or delegated safeguarding lead).
      • Managers rarely or never observe their staff at work, or are rarely or never available to speak to residents (or their families and carers), staff, or other professionals.
      • Managers are overly controlling, constantly interfere when staff are working, and stop staff from trying to improve resident safety or care.
      • The care home does not have policies and procedures covering safeguarding, whistleblowing and/or complaints.
      • The care home has policies and procedures covering safeguarding, whistleblowing and complaints, but does not use them or policy and procedure on safeguarding is inconsistent with the Care Act 2014 or this guideline.
      • The care home enforces blanket procedures and decisions, regardless of residents individual needs, wishes and circumstances and which generally conflict with safeguarding policies and procedures.
      • The care home does not explain the concepts of safeguarding, abuse and neglect to residents.
      • Residents, visitors, staff and other people working in care homes do not have access to policies and procedures covering safeguarding, whistleblowing and complaints.
      • Residents are not involved in how the care home is run.
    • Contractual or regulatory requirements are not being met, for example the care home:
      • Does not meet contractual safeguarding requirements.
      • Does not meet national regulations, including the fundamental standards of quality and safety monitored by the Care Quality Commission.
      • Fails to improve or respond to actions or recommendations arising from inspections or audits by professionals, commissioners and regulators (for example clinical commissioning groups, local authorities, the Care Quality Commission and Healthwatch).
      • Fails to sustain improvements.
      • Does not monitor the quality of their care using the Care Quality Commission's key lines of enquiry and prompts to ensure that the service is safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.
    • Safeguarding concerns are mismanaged and record-keeping is poor, for example:
      • Safeguarding issues are not always reported.
      • No audits or actions are taken after a disclosure.
      • There is no clear safeguarding policy or information about how to raise a safeguarding concern.
      • Serious incidents are not reported (for example, unexplained deaths, serious fires, or infectious disease outbreaks).
      • There is a lack of safeguarding concerns recorded or referrals made.
      • The care home has poor or outdated records.
      • There are inconsistent patterns of safeguarding concerns logged (for example, if all concerns originate from 1 member of staff, then other staff may not be taking enough responsibility for safeguarding).
      • Safeguarding concerns have been reported via complaints procedures rather than through safeguarding procedures.
      • The care home does not comply with Mental Capacity Act requirements on deprivation of liberty and liberty protection safeguards (when enacted).
    • There are concerns about staffing, for example:
      • The care home does not have clear, safe recruitment processes (including reference checks and enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service checks).
      • Staff are not properly supervised and supported, or there is no documentation that this is happening.
      • There is no evidence that safeguarding training or induction is taking place.
      • There are high rates of staff absence.
      • Staff work excessive hours without enough breaks.
      • Staff are working under poor conditions.
      • There is high staff turnover and high dependency on contract or temporary staff.
    • There are concerns about quality of care and service provision for example:
      • There is evidence of poor medicines management (for example, excessive use of 'as needed' medicines).
      • Restrictive practice is used for example residents are prevented from moving around the home freely or independently, staff teams have inflexible and non-negotiable routines that do not take account of what individual residents want or need or staff do not help residents live as independently as they can.
      • Meaningful and structured activities for residents are not available or accessible.
      • Behaviours of concern are mismanaged (for example, overuse of restrictive practices, including misuse of medication).
      • Care and support plans are changed suddenly, without discussion with residents or others involved with their care.
      • Residents do not receive person-centred care, for example care is focused on completing tasks and ignores individual circumstances and preferences (including cultural preferences).
      • Staff routinely make assumptions about residents or their needs, and miss hidden needs or disabilities.
      • Staff do not respond to requests from residents, or interfere with residents' preferences and choices.
      • Residents are reluctant to ask for changes or to make complaints.
      • Certain residents routinely receive preferential treatment over others.
      • There are general inconsistencies in the standard of service provision.
    • There is failure to refer for appropriate care or support for example:
      • Residents miss appointments or are not referred to other professionals or services (for example GPs or dentists).
      • People who require independent advocacy are denied access to it.
    • There are concerns about financial mismanagement and lack of investment for example:
      • There are not enough staff on each shift to meet the needs of residents.
      • There are problems with care home equipment, for example it does not meet the needs of residents; it is poorly maintained or there is not enough equipment for all residents.
      • The care home admits or accepts referrals for residents that staff do not have the skills to care for.
      • There is a lack of investment in the services the care home provides, compared with the fees it charges.
      • Resources (such as one-to-one support) for residents with assessed needs are not provided, despite funding being allocated for this.
      • Residents' money is not adequately protected (for example, they do not have personal allowances).
    • There are physical signs and lack of openness to visitors for example:
      • The care home is dirty or smelly, or is not compliant with basic infection control.
      • Call bells have been removed or deactivated, or are routinely overused.
      • There is a lack of engagement with visitors, or places in the care home that visitors are not allowed to see.
      • The care home discourages visitors without justification.
      • There is a lack of engagement with the organisation the care home is part of.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on when to consider or suspect abuse or neglect in a care home are from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021] with supporting information from the Social Care Institute for Excellence Adult safeguarding practice questions [Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018)], Types and indicators of abuse [Social Care Institute for Excellence, (2015 updated 2021)] and Safeguarding adults protocol pressure ulcers and the interface with a safeguarding enquiry [Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2018].

What else might it be?

  • The possibility of abuse or neglect should always be considered as a cause of behavioural and emotional indicators – this is particularly important for residents who do not communicate using speech, even if indicators appear to be explained by something else.
  • Some indicators of abuse and neglect may be:
    • Similar to signs of distress or behaviours arising from other causes for example there can be similarities with some behaviours associated with dementia, autism, learning disability or acute mental distress.
    • Due to past trauma, including non-recent incidents such as adverse childhood experiences, or past experience of domestic violence or modern slavery.

[NICE, 2021]

Management

Scenario: adult safeguarding

From age 18 years onwards.

Overview

  • If unsure if an indicator of abuse or neglect is a 'consider' or a 'suspect' indicator:
    • Discuss with your safeguarding lead about whether to make a safeguarding referral and/or
    • Seek further advice from the local authority.
  • If you suspect abuse or neglect, you must act on it.
    • Do not assume that someone else will pass on information which may be critical to the safety and wellbeing of the adult.
  • When responding to all indicators of abuse and neglect:
    • Follow the principles of the Making Safeguarding Personal framework.
      • Ensure that any actions are guided by the wishes and feelings of the resident.
      • Be aware that people experiencing abuse or neglect may be influenced, coerced or controlled by someone else.
      • Be aware that duties of care and public interest can over-ride personal preference, for example there is a risk that a perpetrator could abuse again — this needs to be addressed and prevented.
    • Follow the principles of the Mental Capacity Act if a care home resident lacks capacity.
  • If a resident is in immediate danger or if there is a risk to other residents:
  • If individual abuse or neglect is:
  • If self-neglect is suspected:
  • If organisational abuse or neglect is:
  • For information on support during an enquiry:
  • For information on how care homes should learn from safeguarding concerns, referrals and enquiries:
  • For patient information on adult safeguarding in care homes:

Sources of support and advice for the public

  • Sources of advice and support for the public include:

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on actions to take when considering or suspecting abuse or neglect in a care home are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021], Adult safeguarding practice questions [Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018)],  Statutory guidance: care and support statutory guidance [Dept. of Health and Social Care, 2021] with supporting information from the Local Government Association [Local Government Association, 2019] and AgeUK [AgeUK, 2020]. 

What should I do if a resident is in immediate danger or if there is a risk to other residents?

 

  • If a resident is in immediate danger or if there is a risk to other residents (for example the alleged abuser is a person in a position of trust):
    • Take immediate action to make sure people are safe:
      • If there is immediate danger, call 999, provide medical attention if needed, and stay with the resident at risk until help arrives.
      • If a crime is suspected but the situation is not an emergency, encourage and support the resident to report the matter to the police. If they cannot or do not wish to report a suspected crime (for example, because they have been coerced or lack capacity), report the situation to the police yourself.
    • Depending on the risks the resident is facing, and who the alleged abuser is, think about who should be immediately notified. For example:
      • The care home manager.
      • Other healthcare professionals or emergency services.
      • The police or other emergency services if the resident is in immediate danger or you suspect a crime
    • As soon as the resident is safe, follow the steps outlined in the section on Suspected abuse or neglect.
      • If a resident does not want any safeguarding actions to be taken, but you suspect abuse or neglect the recommendations outlined should still be followed and a safeguarding referral must still be made.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on actions to take if abuse or neglect is suspected and a resident is in immediate danger are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021].

Individual abuse or neglect

What should I do if I suspect individual abuse or neglect?

  • Take immediate action to make sure people are safe:
    • If you suspect abuse or neglect, you must act on it - do not assume that someone else will.
    • If there is immediate danger to the resident or others, see the section on immediate danger.
    • Arrange appropriate medical care for the resident at risk if needed.
  • As soon as the resident is safe, start gathering information about the suspected abuse or neglect. Write down:
    • What happened.
    • When it happened.
    • Where it happened.
    • Who was involved (including the resident at risk, any other person who has told you about the abuse or neglect, and the alleged abuser).
  • When talking to the resident (or any other person who has told you about the abuse or neglect):
    • Give them the opportunity to speak freely about what has happened.
    • Use simple and open questions, and ask in a non-leading way.
    • Write down what they tell you, in their own words.
    • If the resident does not communicate with speech, help them explain what has happened as far as possible, and report the situation to the safeguarding lead.
    • Explain the safeguarding process to the resident (or to any other person who has told you about the abuse or neglect) and discuss the next steps.
    • Provide emotional support to the resident (or to any other person who has told you about the abuse or neglect).
    • Do not contact the alleged abuser about the incident yourself, unless this is essential (for example, if a manager needs to immediately suspend a member of staff).
    • Do not investigate the situation yourself, because this could cause problems for police or other investigations and enquiries. Preserve any physical evidence as far as possible (for example, ask the resident to not wash or bathe).
  • Discuss confidentiality:
    • If someone discloses abuse or neglect, tell them that you have a responsibility to report your concerns. Tell them who you will report to, why, and when.
    • If someone discloses abuse or neglect, do not agree to keep secrets or make promises you cannot keep.
  • Report the suspected abuse and neglect:
    • If you suspect abuse or neglect, tell a senior member of staff and the safeguarding lead as soon as is practical (unless the alleged abuser is the only senior member of staff or the safeguarding lead).
    • If you do not feel confident reporting within your organisation, contact the local authority.
    • Members of care home staff or volunteers can also contact a whistleblowing helpline — for more information, see the Care Quality Commission guidance on whistleblowing.

What should I do if I consider individual abuse or neglect?

  • If unsure if an indicator is a 'consider' or a 'suspect' indicator:
    • Discuss with your safeguarding lead about whether to make a safeguarding referral and/or
    • Seek further advice from the local authority.
  • If you 'consider' individual abuse or neglect:
    • Arrange appropriate medical care for the resident at risk if needed.
    • Record what you have found.
    • Seek advice from a safeguarding lead (unless they are implicated in the alleged abuse or neglect).
    • Check whether other indicators have previously been recorded.
    • Discuss the welfare of the resident at risk with a manager or supervisor.
    • Monitor to see if the problem persists or is repeated, and to check for any other indicators.
    • Think whether new information gives cause for your level of concern to rise from 'consider' to 'suspect'.
    • After taking these steps, decide whether there is now a serious concern about the possibility of abuse or neglect. If there is, and you 'suspect' abuse and neglect, see the section on Suspected abuse or neglect.

What should I do if I suspect self-neglect?

  • Self-neglect can be complex and challenging to address, the right balance between respecting a person's autonomy and protecting their health and wellbeing needs to be found. 
  • Be aware that adults who are able to make choices may make decisions that others think of as self-neglect.
  • When deciding how to respond to self-neglect:
    • Think about why the resident may be refusing support.
    • Think about whether the resident has capacity to understand the possible impact of their self-neglect on themselves and others.
    • For more information on assessing capacity see the NICE guideline on Decision making and mental capacity.
  • Assess the risks and needs of the resident:
    • If the resident is refusing support, ask them why, and ask if they would like a different kind of support.
    • Depending on the specific situation, interventions for self-neglect may be more appropriate under the parts of the Care Act which deal with assessment, planning, information and advice, and prevention.
  • If the person does not want any safeguarding or other action to be taken, it may be reasonable not to intervene further, as long as:
    • No-one else is at risk.
    • Their 'vital interests' are not compromised – that is, there is no immediate risk of death or major harm.
    • All decisions are fully explained and recorded.
    • Other agencies have been informed and involved as necessary.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on actions to take when considering or suspecting abuse or neglect in a care home are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021] and the Social Care Institute for Excellence Adult safeguarding practice questions [Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018)].

  • Recommendations on steps to take when abuse or neglect are suspected or considered are from the NICE guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021].
  • The information on when it may be reasonable not to intervene further if the person does not want any safeguarding or other action to be taken is from the Social Care Institute for Excellence Adult Safeguarding practice questions [Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018)].

What should I do if I suspect or consider organisational abuse?

What should I do if I suspect organisational abuse or neglect?

  • If you 'suspect' organisational abuse or neglect — contact your local authority and tell them that you want to make an adult safeguarding referral.
    • When local authorities receive adult safeguarding referrals:
      • They should gather information, under section 4 of the Care Act.
      • They must decide if there is reasonable cause to suspect that an adult with care and support needs is experiencing abuse or neglect and is unable to protect themselves from harm - if this criteria is met, they must conduct a section 42 enquiry.
    • If many residents of a care home are affected, local authorities may conduct a largescale enquiry, following their own local procedures.
  • If not satisfied with the response from the local authority:
    • Make a complaint to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and give feedback to the Care Quality Commission.
  • If organisational abuse or neglect is identified:
    • Consider what individual or collective support is needed for residents, staff, and other people who might be affected.

What should I do if I consider organisational abuse or neglect?

  • Raise the matter with the care home manager, in writing if possible:
    • If the care home manager is believed to be part of the problem, go to the group manager, regional manager, owner or board of trustees.
    • If the care home manager is the sole owner, follow the actions to take if you suspect abuse or neglect.
  • Explain the impact on residents, or the likely impact if the situation continues:
    • Ask for a response within a specified period of time (for example 2 weeks).
    • If the manager agrees to make changes, make sure these happen.
  • After taking these steps, if the situation does not improve, raise your level of concern to 'suspect’ and follow the steps outlined in the section on Suspected organisational abuse or neglect.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on actions to take when considering or suspecting organisational abuse or neglect in a care home are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021].

How should care homes and local authorities respond to reports of abuse or neglect?

How should the care home safeguarding lead respond to reports of abuse or neglect?

  • The care home safeguarding lead should treat any report of abuse or neglect as a safeguarding concern and:
    • Ask the resident at risk what they would like to happen next.
    • Ensure that they have access to communication support.
    • Explain that you have a responsibility to report your concerns to the local authority, and tell them who you will report to, why, and when.
  • When a safeguarding concern has been reported, the safeguarding lead should look at the broader context taking into account:
    • If any other people (including children) are at risk as well as the resident you are concerned about.
    • If there have been repeat allegations.
    • If there could be a criminal offence.
    • If there is a current or past power imbalance in the relationship between the resident and alleged abuser.
  • If the safeguarding lead suspects abuse or neglect, they should make a safeguarding referral to the local authority, in line with the Care Act 2014 and Care Act 2014 statutory guidance.
  • If the safeguarding lead is not sure whether to make a safeguarding referral to the local authority (because they are not sure whether they suspect abuse or neglect), they should discuss with the local authority.

How should the local authority respond to reports of abuse or neglect?

  • In response to a report of abuse or neglect, the local authority should:
    • Ensure that there is a process for care homes to discuss safeguarding concerns with social workers or other qualified safeguarding practitioners without formally making a safeguarding referral.
    • Consider providing a single point of contact for care homes, local agencies and practitioners, so they can seek expert advice on safeguarding in care homes (for example, to help decide whether a referral should be made).
    • Be aware that safeguarding referrals may come from a care home's openness and awareness of the safeguarding policy, as well as being possible signs of poor care.
    • Along with other organisations involved in assessing safeguarding referrals use professional judgement, supported by the recommendations on indicators of individual abuse and neglect. They should not be limited in their view of what abuse or neglect is, and should always consider the circumstances of the individual case.
  • When a safeguarding referral is made:
    • The local authority should decide as quickly as possible whether this meets the legal criteria for a section 42 safeguarding enquiry (as defined in the Care Act).
    • As soon as this is done, they should tell the resident and the care home safeguarding lead what they have decided.
  • If a section 42 safeguarding enquiry is not needed, the local authority should:
    • Discuss what other support is needed with the care home and the resident.
    • Provide advice and support to help improve outcomes for the resident (for example, by reviewing the care and support plan and risk management procedures).
  • If a section 42 safeguarding enquiry is needed, the local authority should:
    • Decide who needs to be informed or consulted, depending on the individual context.
    • Set up an initial planning discussion about the safeguarding enquiry with relevant people, and (if appropriate) involve staff from the care home or care home provider.
    • Appoint an enquiry lead to coordinate the work of the enquiry and act as a main point of contact.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on response to reports of abuse or neglect in a care home are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021].

How should residents and care home staff be supported during a safeguarding enquiry?

How should a resident at risk be supported during a safeguarding enquiry?

  • Everyone involved with a safeguarding enquiry should be aware that the resident at risk is entitled to and may benefit from support (regardless of their mental capacity).
    • Practical and emotional support should be provided:
      • While the enquiry is taking place.
      • When the enquiry has finished, to help deliver the outcomes the person wishes to achieve.
      • As needed after the enquiry (for example, by updating the care and support plan or protection plan, conducting risk assessments, or through future reviews).
  • At the start of the safeguarding enquiry, the enquiry lead should ask the resident at risk:
    • What they would like the enquiry to achieve – the resident should be given the opportunity to review and revise their desired outcomes throughout the process.
    • How they would like to be involved — the resident (and their family or an appropriate advocate) should be involved throughout the enquiry process, in line with their wishes and mental capacity, unless there are exceptional circumstances that justify their exclusion.
    • If and how they would like to be kept up to date during the enquiry.
    • Who they would like to support them through the enquiry (in addition to any legal rights to advocacy) — information and support should be provided to informal advocates chosen by the resident at risk (for example, family and friends).
  • When the safeguarding enquiry finishes:
    • Consider what ongoing support the resident may need for example referral for specialist support (such as psychological support).
    • The enquiry lead should provide feedback for the resident (and their family and advocates) that:
      • Summarises the enquiry, and includes the relevant outcomes and recommendations.
      • Gives them the information needed to decide whether they wish to take any further action (for example, informing the Care Quality Commission or making a complaint to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman).
  • Be aware that when the alleged abuser is another resident, they may also need support (including advocacy).
    • Risks between residents should be appropriately managed while any enquiry takes place.
What is advocacy?
  • Under the Mental Capacity Act, local authorities, the NHS and other responsible bodies have a duty to make sure that an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) is available to represent an adult who lacks capacity to make specific decisions for themselves and who does not have a family member or friend to support them.
    • In a safeguarding situation, an IMCA can be used even if a suitable family member or friend is also available.
  • All organisations involved with safeguarding adults in care homes should:
    • Understand the role of advocacy in relation to safeguarding, and that the advocate is the only person who acts solely according to instructions from the resident.
    • Think about the resident's needs and know when to refer people for advocacy.
    • Involve an independent advocate for the resident, when this is required by the Care Act 2014 and Care Act 2014 statutory guidance or the Mental Capacity Act.
    • Ensure that anyone supporting the resident as an informal or independent advocate has been identified in line with the resident's statutory rights to advocacy under the Care Act and the Mental Capacity Act.
  • Care homes should tell residents:
    • How advocates can help them with safeguarding enquiries.
    • That they may have a legal right to an advocate, and what the criteria for this are.
  • Practitioners involved in managing safeguarding concerns should build effective working relationships with advocates and other people supporting the resident.
  • Local authorities and commissioners should monitor:
    • Whether care homes are telling residents about advocacy and the criteria for accessing this and
    • How advocates are involved in the management of safeguarding concerns.

[Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018); NICE, 2021]

How should care home staff be supported during a safeguarding enquiry?

  • Unless they are subject to the safeguarding enquiry themselves, care home managers should:
    • Find out from the local authority what they can share with staff at each stage of the enquiry.
    • Communicate as much as possible with all staff about the enquiry, and be open to answering questions.
  • If a care home manager is subject to a safeguarding enquiry, the care home or care home provider should put an acting manager in their place.
  • During safeguarding enquiries, care home providers and managers should:
    • Be aware of how safeguarding allegations can affect the way other staff and residents view a person subject to a safeguarding enquiry.
      • If staff are concerned about working with a resident who has made allegations, care home managers should provide support, additional training and supervision to address these concerns and ensure that the resident is not victimised by staff.
    • Acknowledge that enquiries are stressful and that morale may be low.
    • Think of ways to support staff (such as one-to-one supervision and team meetings).
    • Provide extra support to cover absences as part of the enquiry, and to help staff continue providing consistent and high-quality care.
    • Direct staff to sources of external support or advice if needed
  • When a member of staff is subject to a safeguarding enquiry, care home providers and managers should:
    • Tell them about any available Employee Assistance Programme.
    • Tell them about professional counselling and occupational health services (if available).
    • Nominate someone to keep in touch with them throughout the enquiry (if they are suspended from work).
      • They should be able to request that the nominated person be replaced, if they think there is a conflict of interest.
      • The nominated person should not be directly involved with the enquiry.
      • If the police are involved, care home providers and managers should tell them who the nominated person is.
  • For members of staff who return to work after being suspended, care home providers and managers should:
    • Arrange a return-to-work meeting when the enquiry is finished, to give them a chance to discuss and resolve any problems.
    • Agree a programme of guidance and support with them.

How should the local authority support care homes during a safeguarding enquiry?

  • During an enquiry local authorities should support care homes by:
    • Ensuring that there is a single point of contact to keep the care home informed about the progress of the safeguarding enquiry.
    • Being aware of the reputational impact on the care home's business (for example, on recruitment, resourcing and financial losses), and ensure that their actions are timely and proportionate.
    • Being aware that care home staff may be anxious about their job security because of a safeguarding enquiry.
    • Offering positive feedback to care homes when they handle safeguarding concerns well and practical support to care home staff, to help with safeguarding enquiries.
    • Sharing the outcomes of safeguarding enquiries with commissioners, so that they can incorporate the findings into their own decisions (for example, whether to lift a placement embargo).

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on support during a safeguarding enquiry in a care home are from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021] with supporting information from the Social Care Institute for Excellence [Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015 (updated 2018)].

What should care homes learn from safeguarding concerns and enquiries?

  • Care home managers and managers from local agencies should help their organisations to identify key lessons from the outcome of any safeguarding concern, referral, enquiry, or Safeguarding Adults Review.
    • Care home managers should incorporate learning from safeguarding concerns, referrals and enquiries into the care home culture at all levels for example through:
      • Changes to support, supervision, retraining, and performance management for individual staff.
      • Observations of practice, discussion and watching people work across the care home and changes in practices, procedures, policy and learning, and group training.
      • Policy changes for the care home provider.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on learning from safeguarding enquiries in care homes are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189) [NICE, 2021].

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189).

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of Safeguarding of Adults in Care Homes.

Search dates

January 2015 - October 2021

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • (safeguard* or safe guard* or prevent* or promot* or reduc* or protect* or assist*) ADJ3 (elder* or older or carer* or caregiver* or employee* or worker* or professional*).ti,ab.
  • (home care services/ or health services for the aged/ ) OR (Home care service* or respite care*).kw.
  • (neglect* or ill-treat* or maltreat* or mistreat* or exploit* or fraud* or assault* or crime* or violen* or bully* or increase* or aggressi* or coerc* or extort* or stigmati* or ostraci*).ti,ab. ADJ3 (abused or victim* or abuser* or perpertrator* or crim* or offend*).ti,ab.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • Age UK (2020) Safeguarding older people from abuse and neglect: factsheet 78. http://www.ageuk.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Care Quality Commission (2018) Inspectors handbook: safeguarding. [Free Full-text]
  • Care Quality Commission (2021a) Safeguarding adults: roles and responsibilities in health and care services. [Free Full-text]
  • Care Quality Commission (CQC) (2021b) The state of health care and adult social care in England 2020/21. https://www.cqc.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Department of Health and Social Care (2016) Care Act factsheets. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Dept. of Health and Social Care (2018) Safeguarding adults protocol pressure ulcers and the interface with a safeguarding enquiry. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Dept. of Health and Social Care (2021) Statutory guidance: care and support statutory guidance. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Drennan, J., Lafferty, A., Treacy, M.P., et al. (2012) Older people in residential care settings: results of a national survey of staff-resident interactions and conflicts. Dublin: National Centre for the Protection of Older People (NCPOP) UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Heath Systems, i-104.
  • Gibson, J., Nicol, B. and Ronayne, E. and Grant, M (2016) Safeguarding adults in primary care: making a safeguarding adults referral. British Journal of General Practice 66(647): e454-456 66(647), e454-e456.
  • General Medical Council (2021) Ethical hub – Adult safeguarding. https://www.gmc-uk.org [Free Full-text]
  • Johnson, K. and Boland, B. (2019) Adult safeguarding under the Care Act 2014. Bjpsych Bulletin 43(1), 38-42.
  • Lachs MS, Teresi JA, Ramirez M, van Haitsma K, Silver S, Eimicke JP, et al. (2016) The prevalence of resident-to-resident elder mistreatment in nursing homes. Ann Intern Med 165(4), 229-236.
  • Local Government Association (2019) ‘Myths and realities’ about Making safeguarding personal. https://www.local.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Manthorpe, J. and Martineau, S (2017) Engaging with the New System of Safeguarding Adults Reviews Concerning Care Homes for Older People. British Journal of Social Work 47(7): 2086-2099 47(7), 2086-2099.
  • NHS (2021) Safeguarding Adults: a guide for health care staff. https://www.england.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) Safeguarding adults in care homes (NG189). https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Royal College of General Practitioners (2017) Adult safeguarding toolkit. [Free Full-text]
  • Social Care Institute for Excellence Types and indicators of abuse. https://www.scie.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Social Care Institute for Excellence Adult safeguarding practice questions. https://www.scie.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Storey J (2020) Risk factors for elder abuse and neglect: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior 50(101339).
  • Yon, Y., Ramiro-Gonzalez, M., Mikton, C. R. and Huber, M. and Sethi, D (2019) The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of public health 29(1), 58-67.
Change privacy settings