This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Infections and infestations Skin and nail

Paronychia - acute

Last revised in February 2025

An acute paronychia is a localized, superficial infection or abscess of the lateral and proximal skin fold around a nail (perionychium)

Paronychia - acute: Summary

  • An acute paronychia is a localized, superficial infection or abscess of the lateral and proximal skin fold around a nail (perionychium), causing painful swelling.
    • Acute paronychial infections are most often caused by Staphylococcus aureus.
    • Paronychia is common in all age groups and is three times more common in women than in men.
  • Paronychial infections develop from barrier disruption or trauma to the skin surrounding the nail plate, which allows the entry of infecting organisms.
    • Local risk factors include aggressive manicuring, artificial nail placement, frequent hand immersion in water, finger sucking and nail biting, hang nail, ingrown nail, trauma and pemphigus vulgaris.
  • Most cases of acute paronychia resolve in 2–4 days with treatment. Untreated infection may lead to chronic paronychia or complications, such as damage to tendons and nail loss.
  • Acute paronychia usually affects one finger. Typical features include:
    • Pain and swelling at the base of the fingernail.
    • Localized pain and tenderness of the nail folds.
    • Red, tender, and swollen lateral and/or proximal nail folds often with a visible collection of pus.
  • Conditions that may resemble paronychia include cutaneous candidiasis, acute contact dermatitis, staphylococcal whitlow, finger-tip injuries, insect bites, fungal nail infections, herpetic whitlow, cancer (for example melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma), psoriasis, reactive arthritis, dyshidrotic eczema, pemphigus vulgaris and foreign body.
  • If a fluctuant pus collection or abscess has developed, incision and drainage are recommended. This may require referral to a surgical unit or emergency department.
    • Application of moist heat three to four times a day will alleviate pain, localize the infection, and hasten draining of the pus.
  • A swab of the contents of a paronychia may be required if:
    • The paronychia is enlarging.
    • There is inflammation of surrounding tissue.
    • The paronychia is recurrent.
    • The paronychia has not responded to treatment within 2 to 3 days.
    • The person is systemically unwell.
    • The person has a history of contact with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis.
    • The person is immunosuppressed.
    • The person has diabetes.
  • Antibiotics may be required if incision and drainage are not performed, there are signs of cellulitis or fever, or comorbidities such as diabetes or immunosuppression are present.
    • Flucloxacillin or clarithromycin are the first-line antibiotic options.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 1 month onwards.

This CKS topic covers the management of acute paronychia.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of chronic paronychia.

There are separate CKS topics on Fungal nail infection and Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic).

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

CKS gratefully acknowledges the contribution of the British Association of Dermatologists in the development of this topic.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

February 2025 — minor update. Duration of antibiotic treatment updated to 5–7 days.  

Previous changes

May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contraindicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

December 2023 — minor update. Update to drug interactions section for erythromycin to include information on interactions with Lomitapide and Corticosteroids, as per the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

November 2023 — minor update. Interactions section for flucloxacillin updated in line with updated manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.

July 2023 — minor update. The summary of manufacturer’s product characteristics for clarithromycin was updated to include a warning regarding concomitant treatment with domperidone (due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias).

August 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in August 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. Supporting references have been added to the existing guidance, with no major changes made to the recommendations. Prescribing information has been added for topical fusidic acid cream. 

January 2021 — minor update. Contraindications and drug interactions for erythromycin have been updated in line with an MHRA drug safety update. 

January 2017 to May 2017 — reviewed. Literature searches were conducted in January 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to the topic. Minor changes have been made including consideration of topical antibiotics and the removal of procedural directions for incision and drainage.

July 2015 — minor update. The prescribing information sections on erythromycin and clarithromycin have been clarified.

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing.

June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. 

November 2010 to March 2011 — CKS topic revised. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

August 2007 — Oilatum Plus discontinued. Minor change to the text made and prescriptions removed. 

December 2006 to March 2007 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

October 2006 — minor update. Analgesia prescriptions updated because new doses of ibuprofen for children are recommended by the British National Formulary. 

November 2005 — minor technical update. 

September 2003 — written. Validated in December 2003 and issued in February 2004.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 August 2022.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 August 2022.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 August 2022.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic review or meta-analysis since 1 August 2022.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 August 2022.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 August 2022.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 August 2022.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 August 2022.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

  • To support primary healthcare professionals:
    • To make a diagnosis of paronychia. 
    • To alleviate symptoms of acute paronychial infections.
    • To limit the duration of acute paronychial infections.
    • To minimize the risk of complications of paronychia.
    • To refer people with acute paronychia when appropriate.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

  • Antibiotic prescribing
    • Review and, where appropriate, revise prescribing and local policies that relate to antimicrobial stewardship to ensure these are in line with NICE guidelines on antimicrobial stewardship: systems and processes for effective antimicrobial medicine use [NICE, 2015] and antimicrobial stewardship: changing risk-related behaviours in the general population [NICE, 2017].
    • Review and, where appropriate, optimise current prescribing practice and use implementation techniques to ensure prescribing is in line with NICE and Public Health England (PHE) guidance on managing common infections in primary care [NICE and PHE, 2022] and the TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit [RCGP, 2021] jointly developed by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) and the Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care (ASPIC) Group.
    • Review the total volume of antibiotic prescribing against local and national data.

NICE quality standards

NICE Quality Standards on Antimicrobial Stewardship [NICE, 2016] advise that:

  • People with a self-limiting condition, as assessed by a primary care prescriber, should receive advice about self‑management and the adverse consequences of overusing antimicrobials.
    • People with a minor, localised paronychial infection without a fluctuant pus collection or abscess, may not know that they are likely to get better without treatment, and they may expect to be prescribed an antimicrobial.
    • Primary care prescribers should manage people's expectations by describing the adverse consequences of using antimicrobials when they are not needed, both for the person and the population as a whole.
  • Clinicians should also advise on what the person can do to help their condition improve. 

Background information

What is it?

What causes it?

  • Paronychial infections develop from barrier disruption or trauma to the skin surrounding the nail plate, which allows the entry of infecting organisms.
  • Acute paronychial infections are most often caused by Staphylococcus aureus [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Dulski and Edwards, 2022; Rerucha, 2019]. However, other organisms may be involved such as Pseudomonas and Streptococcus species, as well as other gram-negative bacilliform bacterium [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].
    • Anaerobic bacteria may be present in children secondary to finger sucking [Rerucha, 2019].
    • Gram-negative bacteria, herpes simplex virus, dermatophytes, and yeast have also been reported as causative organisms [Durdu, 2014].

What are the risk factors?

  • Local risk factors for acute paronychia [Leggit, 2017; DynaMed, 2019; Rerucha, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Relhan and Bansal, 2022]:
    • Aggressive manicuring, such as trimming or pushing back the cuticle.
    • Artificial nail placement.
    • Frequent hand immersion in water and excessive hand washing (dish washing, gardening, and housekeeping).
    • Chemical irritant exposure.
    • Finger sucking and nail biting — this is a common risk factor, especially in children.
    • Hang nail.
    • Ingrown nail.
    • Trauma.
    • Pemphigus vulgaris.
  • Systemic conditions associated with acute paronychia [DynaMed, 2019; Dulski and Edwards, 2022; Gupta, 2022]:
    • Obesity.
    • Hyperhydrosis.
    • Diabetes mellitus.
    • Polyendocrinopathy.
    • Immunosuppression, such as people with HIV or taking immunosuppressive drugs.
    • Retroviral use.
    • Oral retinoid use which dries the skin, for example, isotretinoin.
    • Chemotherapy drugs (including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and taxanes among others).

How common is it?

What are the complications?

What is the prognosis?

Acute paronychia generally has a very good prognosis if treatment is prompt and given alongside patient education [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].

  • Most cases of acute paronychia resolve within a few days and will rarely reoccur in healthy people [Dulski and Edwards, 2022].
  • Untreated infection may lead to chronic paronychia or complications, such as damage to tendons and nail loss [Leggit, 2017].

Diagnosis of paronychia - acute

How do I know a person has acute paronychia?

  • Take a history.
    • Typical features of acute paronychia include:
      • Pain and swelling at the base of the fingernail, although the toenail can also be affected.
      • Localized pain and tenderness of the nail folds.
    • Acute paronychia usually affects one finger.
    • There may be a history of trauma to the nail 2 to 5 days earlier.
  • Examine the person.
    • The lateral and/or proximal nail folds are red, tender, and swollen, and a visible collection of pus may be present.
    • In more severe cases, there may be:
      • Extension to the proximal nail edge (eponychium), and abscess formation with fluctuance. Abscess formation is less common in young children.
      • Extension under the nail plate to form a subungual abscess (floating nail).
    • Certain symptoms may point to viral (herpes simplex) rather than bacterial infection. These include lancinating pain, the presence of vesicles, or a herpetiform arrangement of pustules and/or vesicles.
  • Assess the person for the presence of pus or fluctuance.
    • In early infection, it may be difficult to decide whether pus is present.
    • If in doubt about whether an abscess is present, perform the digital pressure test by asking the person to oppose their thumb and the affected finger (thereby applying pressure to the distal volar aspect). The increase in pressure within the nail fold causes blanching of the overlying skin and demarcation of any pus.

Basis for recommendation

Typical symptoms of acute paronychia

Findings on examination

Digital pressure test

  • The guidance on how to carry out a digital pressure test to assess for early infection is based on expert opinion in a review article [Leggit, 2017].

Symptoms indicating viral infection

  • The guidance on symptoms which may be indicative of herpes simplex infection as the cause of acute paronychia s based on expert opinion in a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].

What else could it be?

  • Conditions that may resemble paronychia include:
    • Cutaneous candidiasis.
    • Acute contact dermatitis.
    • Staphylococcal whitlow. For more information, see the CKS topic on Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic).
    • Finger-tip injuries.
    • Insect bites or stings.
    • Fungal nail infections. For more information, see the CKS topic on Fungal nail infection.
    • Herpetic whitlow — this appears as either a single or a group of blisters. For more information, see the CKS topic on Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic).
    • Cancer (for example melanoma, Bowen disease or squamous cell carcinoma).
    • Psoriasis.
    • Reactive arthritis (previously known as Reiter's syndrome).
    • Dyshidrotic eczema (pompholyx).
    • Pemphigus vulgaris.
    • Foreign body.
    • Myxoid cyst.
    • Glomus tumour.

Basis for recommendation

This information is based on expert opinion in review articles [Leggit, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; PCDS, 2022; Lee, 2022; Relhan and Bansal, 2022] and a case report of nail apparatus squamous cell carcinoma mimicking paronychia [Monica, 2019].

Management

Scenario: Management

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage a person with an acute paronychia?

  • Advise the person to apply moist heat (warm soaks) for ten to fifteen minutes, three to four times a day to alleviate pain, localize the infection, and hasten draining of the pus ('bring to a head').
  • Incision and drainage are recommended if a fluctuant pus collection or abscess has developed.
    • Incision and drainage may be performed in primary care if the expertise and facilities are available. Otherwise, the person should be referred to a surgical unit or Emergency department, according to local protocol.
  • Consider prescribing topical antibiotics, such as fusidic acid cream, for minor, localised infection.
  • Consider prescribing a course of oral antibiotics if incision and drainage:
    • Is not performed.
    • Was performed, but the person has significant pain, involvement of an extended area of periungual tissue, signs of cellulitis or fever, or has other comorbidities (such as diabetes or immunosuppression).
      • Flucloxacillin or clarithromycin are recommended first line (erythromycin is generally preferred over clarithromycin in pregnant and breastfeeding women).
      • For further information, see Prescribing information.
  • Seek specialist advice if the person is already known to have meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection or a swab sample from the paronychia grows MRSA.
  • Give the person self-care advice:
    • Advise all people to:
      • Take paracetamol or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) as required for pain relief.
      • Keep the affected areas clean and dry.
      • Avoid further trauma or manipulation of the nail.
      • Trim hang nails to a semi-lunar smooth edge and avoid biting nails or lateral nail folds.
    • If the person works with their hands in a moist environment (such as dish washers), advise that:
      • Frequent exposure to water (particularly with detergent) increases their risk of getting a paronychia.
      • Treatment is unlikely to be successful if exposure to the wet or moist environment continues.
      • They should wear gloves (preferably cotton lined) to protect fingers.
    • If the person is immunocompromised, advise that they should remain vigilant against any minor trauma to the finger tips and nails.
  • Follow up is not usually necessary, as most paronychia drain spontaneously without the need for incision and drainage (if this has not already been performed). However, advise the person that they should:
    • Return for review if the paronychia becomes fluctuant (as it may require incision and drainage), or if it persists and does not discharge or improve.
    • Seek urgent medical advice if they become systemically unwell (for example if they develop a fever) or develop signs of a complication such as cellulitis.
  • If the paronychia is due to an ingrowing toenail, this must be addressed.
    • The management of ingrowing toenail is not covered by this topic.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are pragmatic and consistent with expert opinion in review articles [Lomax, 2016; Leggit, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Dulski and Edwards, 2022; Lee, 2022; Relhan and Bansal, 2022].

Incision and drainage
  • The recommendation that incision and drainage should be carried out when there is a collection of pus or abscess formation is based on expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Dulski and Edwards, 2022; Macneal and Milroy, 2022; Relhan and Bansal, 2022] and is common practice. However, there is limited evidence to demonstrate benefit over antibiotics [Shaw and Body, 2005].
    • There is no widely agreed consensus on incision and drainage techniques. Approaches should be adapted based on the location and extent of the fluctuant pus collection [Macneal and Milroy, 2022].
    • In cases of localised infection, paronychial abscesses can be drained simply by elevating the eponychial fold from the nail using a small blunt instrument [Macneal and Milroy, 2022].
    • Where required, incision may be performed using a sharp device such as a scalpel or a hypodermic needle directed away from the nail bed [Macneal and Milroy, 2022].
    • Gentle pressure can be applied to the external skin to express the pus collection, then the cavity can be irrigated with saline [Macneal and Milroy, 2022].
Prescribing topical antibiotics
Prescribing systemic antibiotics
  • The recommendation to consider oral antibiotics in people with severe or painful paronychia is based on expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; PCDS, 2022].
  • A review article did not identify any controlled trials comparing oral antibiotics with incision and drainage for the treatment of acute paronychia [Shaw and Body, 2005].
  • CKS did not identify evidence from trials to guide the management of acute paronychia, and it is uncertain whether antibiotics should always be used to treat paronychia that have been incised and drained. However, expert opinion suggests that antibiotics are not always necessary following incision and drainage, but should be always be considered if the person has associated fever or cellulitis, or other comorbidities (for example diabetes or immunosuppression).
  • A prospective study of 46 cases of uncomplicated acute paronychia and/or felon treated by incision and drainage but without postoperative antibiotics, in patients without risk factors such as immunosuppression or diabetes, found that only one patient developed recurrence, suggesting that postoperative antibiotics are not necessary in this patient group [Pierrart, 2016].
Choice of antibiotics
  • The recommendations on the choice of oral antibiotics are based on expert opinion in review articles [Riain, 2006] and extrapolated from joint guidance issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Public Health England on the management of skin infections such as impetigo (guidance last updated 2020) and cellulitis (guidance last updated 2019) [NICE and PHE, 2022].
    • Flucloxacillin is recommended as a first-line treatment option because it has a narrow spectrum of activity and is active against most Gram-positive cocci, including staphylococci and beta-haemolytic streptococci [Riain, 2006]. It diffuses well into most tissues and is therefore suitable for skin and soft-tissue infections [Finch, 2003].
    • Clarithromycin and erythromycin are macrolide antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity against most sensitive Gram-positive cocci (including staphylococci and streptococci) and some Gram-negative cocci and anaerobes [Finch, 2003; Riain, 2006].
      • Clarithromycin is generally thought to be better tolerated than erythromycin, and also has a more convenient dosing regimen [NICE and PHE, 2021].
      • Erythromycin is the preferred choice in pregnant women as there is extensive experience of its use in pregnancy [MHRA, 2021].
Seeking advice for patients at risk of MRSA
  • It is the opinion of CKS that specialist advice should be sought to guide treatment in people with infection that is suspected to be due to MRSA.
Self-care advice

 

When should I take a swab in a person with acute paronychia?

  • Consider taking a swab of the contents of a paronychia if:
    • The paronychia is enlarging.
    • There is inflammation of surrounding tissue.
    • The paronychia is recurrent.
    • The paronychia has not responded to treatment within 2 to 3 days.
    • The person is systemically unwell.
    • The person has a history of contact with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis.
    • The person is immunosuppressed.
    • The person has diabetes.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the expert opinion of our reviewers, including the British Association of Dermatologists.

How should I manage recurrent acute paronychia?

  • Consider an alternative diagnosis, particularly herpetic whitlow, which can mimic recurrent paronychia.
  • Exclude other underlying causes, particularly recurrent trauma to the nails (such as nail biting) or frequent immersion of the hands in water.
  • Swab the lesion (to confirm the causative organism and antibiotic sensitivities) and treat the person with the appropriate antibiotics.
  • If the person is already known to have methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection or a swab sample of pus grows MRSA, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care for further information.
  • Consider X-ray imaging in refractory acute paronychia to assess for osteomyelitis.
  • Give self-care advice, including advice on preventing recurrence by:
    • Avoiding using cuticle removers or trimming the cuticle.
    • Avoiding trauma to the nails, such as picking, sucking, or biting.
    • Keeping the nails clean and dry.
  • Advise people who work with their hands in moist environment (such as dish washers) that:
    • Frequent exposure to water (particularly with detergent) increases their risk of getting a paronychia.
    • They should wear gloves (preferably cotton lined) to protect fingers.
    • They should thoroughly dry hands with a clean towel and apply antibacterial moisturiser after washing.

Basis for recommendation

Management of recurrent acute paronychia
  • These recommendations are based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
  • The recommendation to consider a further 7 days of appropriate antibiotics if response is slow to the initial 7 day course is extrapolated from guidance on the management of skin infections jointly published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Public Health England [NICE and PHE, 2022].
  • The recommendation to consider referral for an X-ray is based on expert advice in a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].
  • A retrospective review of antibiotic-resistant acute paronychia identified methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), viruses such as herpesvirus, candida and pemphigus vulgaris as causes. Nail-biting and finger/thumb sucking were found to be the most common predisposing features [Durdu, 2014].
Self-care advice

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Topical fusidic acid

Dose

  • Adults and children: apply 3 to 4 times daily for 7 days.
    • To avoid the development of bacterial resistance, it is generally recommended that topical fusidic acid should not be used for longer than 10 days.

[ABPI, 2019; BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe topical fusidic acid to people with:
    • A history of hypersensitivity to either fusidic acid or any of the product excipients.
  • Cautions:
    • Due to possible fire accelerant effects and the risk of severe burns, avoid contact with naked flames or burning material (including tobacco) after application.

[ABPI, 2019]

Adverse effects

  • Adverse effects include:
    • Skin reactions such as pruritus, rash, erythema, angioedema, urticaria, blister.
    • Application site pain and irritation.

[ABPI, 2019; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • There are no relevant drug interactions. 

[ABPI, 2019]

Flucloxacillin

Dose

  • Adults: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 1 year: 62.5–125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–9 years: 125–250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 10–17 years: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe flucloxacillin in people with:
    • A true penicillin allergy — allergic reactions to penicillins occur in 1–10% of exposed individuals; anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of treated people.
      • People with a history of atopy (e.g. asthma, eczema, hay fever) are at a higher risk of anaphylactic reactions to penicillins — people with a history of anaphylaxis, urticaria, or rash immediately after penicillin administration are at risk of immediate hypersensitivity and should not receive a penicillin.
      • People with a history of a minor rash (non-confluent, non-pruritic rash restricted to a small area of the body) or a rash that occurs more than 72 hours after penicillin administration are probably not allergic to penicillin and it should not be withheld unnecessarily for serious infections — the possibility of an allergic reaction should, however, be borne in mind.
    • History of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution in people with:
    • Hepatic dysfunction (not flucloxacillin-related), aged over 50 years, or with a serious underlying medical condition — these people are at increased risk of hepatic reactions.
    • Severe renal impairment — reduce the dose if the person's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2.
    • A history of allergy — these people are more likely to develop a sensitivity reaction.

[EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Gastrointestinal — diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting (common).
    • Very rarely: antibiotic-associated colitis.
  • Nervous system — headache, dizziness (uncommon).
  • Skin and subcutaneous tissue — skin rash, urticaria and purpura (uncommon).
    • Very rarely: erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis.
  • Other rare, or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Anaphylaxis.
    • Arthralgia and myalgia (very rare) — may sometimes develop more than 48 hours after the start of the treatment.
    • Hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice — this may occur up to several weeks after treatment with flucloxacillin has been stopped. Risk factors include treatment for more than 2 weeks, and increasing age.
    • Interstitial nephritis.
    • Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia.

[EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Methotrexate — methotrexate clearance may be reduced, causing an increased risk of toxicity, however, serious interactions are uncommon. 
    • Standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination in people on high-dose regimens. For people on low-dose regimens, consult local or national guidelines/protocols for monitoring and management.
  • Coumarin and indanedione anticoagulants (warfarin, phenidione) — consider increased monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the dose accordingly.
  • Posaconazole, voriconazole — concentrations of antifungal is greatly decreased. If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue). 
  • Probenecid — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of flucloxacillin.
  • Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
  • Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.

[Preston, 2023]

Clarithromycin

Dose

  • Adults: 250–500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 11 years with body weight:
      • Less than 8 kg: 7.5 mg per kg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 8–11 kg: 62.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 12–19 kg: 125 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 20–29 kg: 187.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 30–40 kg: 250 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
    • 12 years and over:  250–500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
    • A history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including Torsades de pointes.
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation, such as electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia) or the use of some medications that prolong the QT interval.
    • Severe hepatic impairment in combination with renal impairment.
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution to people with:
    • Hepatic impairment (or concurrently receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs).
    • Moderate to severe renal impairment.
      • For immediate-release preparations: if creatinine clearance (CrCl) is less than 30 mL/minute, prescribe half the normal dose and use for a maximum duration of 14 days.
      • For modified-release preparations: if CrCl is 30–60 mL/minute, prescribe half the normal dose. Avoid if CrCl is less than 30 mL/minute.
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolides may aggravate weakness symptoms.
    • Other risk factors for QT prolongation, such as:
      • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances, or clinically relevant bradycardia.
      • The use of some medications associated with QT prolongation. 

[EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Cardiac — cardiac arrest, atrial fibrillation, QT interval prolongation (uncommon).
    • Rarely: Torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation.
  • Gastrointestinal — diarrhoea, vomiting, dyspepsia, nausea, abdominal pain (common).
  • Nervous system — headache, dysgeusia (common), dizziness, somnolence, tremor (uncommon).
    • Rarely: convulsions, paraesthesia.
  • Psychiatric — insomnia (common), anxiety, nervousness (uncommon).
    • Rarely or very rarely: psychotic disorders, depression, mania, hallucination.
  • Skin — rash, hyperhidrosis (common), pruritus, urticaria (uncommon).
    • Rarely, or very rarely: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP).
  • Other adverse effects reported rarely, or very rarely, include: 
    • Anaphylaxis.
    • Deafness.
    • Hepatic failure, jaundice.
    • Pancreatitis. 
    • Renal failure, interstitial nephritis.
    • Rhabdomyolysis, myopathy.

[EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • CYP3A enzyme inducers (rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital) — these may induce the metabolism of clarithromycin, resulting in sub-therapeutic levels.
    • It may be necessary to monitor the levels of these drugs, as CYP3A is inhibited by clarithromycin leading to higher plasma levels of the inducer.
  • Concurrent use with clarithromycin increases exposure to the following drugs: 
    • Calcium channel blockers (verapamil, amlodipine, diltiazem) —  monitor for adverse effects (for example, bradycardia, hypotension, headache, oedema) and reduce the calcium-channel blocker dose as necessary.
    • Ciclosporin — if concurrent use is necessary, monitor ciclosporin levels and adjust the dose accordingly.
    • Colchicine — concurrent use is contraindicated. 
    • Digoxin — monitor for signs of adverse effects, measure digoxin levels and reduce the digoxin dose if required.
    • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contra-indicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
    • Midazolam — reduce oral dose by 50 to 75%, and advise patients about sedative risk.
    • Oral anticoagulants (such as direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs] and warfarin) — there is a risk of serious haemorrhage and significant elevations in international normalized ratio (INR) and prothrombin time when co-administered with clarithromycin.
      • DOACs — monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding or anaemia, especially, in elderly people and those with renal impairment. 
      • Warfarin — monitor INR and prothrombin times closely during concurrent treatment with clarithromycin
    • Statins —  increased risk of myopathy.
      • Lovastatin, simvastatin — concurrent use is contraindicated. If treatment with clarithromycin cannot be avoided, stop treatment with statin temporarily.
      • Atorvastatin — levels moderately increased with concurrent use. Temporarily withhold statin, or if necessary, reduce dose and warn patients to report any unexplained muscle pain or weakness. 
    • Tacrolimus — large increases in tacrolimus concentrations and renal toxicity have been reported with clarithromycin. Both clarithromycin and tacrolimus have been associated with QT prolongation or torsade de pointes but an effect is not established. Monitor the concentrations and effects (e.g. on renal function) of tacrolimus more frequently if clarithromycin is started or stopped, adjusting the tacrolimus dose as necessary.
    • Ticagrelor — avoid concurrent use.
    • Ranolazine — may increase risk of QT interval prolongation. Avoid concurrent use.  
    • Rimegepant — avoid concurrent use. 
    • Daridorexant — avoid concurrent use.
    • Eletriptan — concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
    • Eplerenone, finerenone — concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Quetiapine — concurrent use is contraindicated.
  • Ergot alkaloids — concurrent administration is contraindicated, due to the risk of acute ergot toxicity.
  • Oral hypoglycaemic drugs (sulfonylureas) and insulin — the concurrent use of clarithromycin and oral hypoglycaemic drugs and/or insulin can result in significant hypoglycaemia. Monitor glucose levels.
  • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
    • Avoid concurrent treatment with drugs that increase the risk of hypokalaemia, such as diuretics, corticosteroids, and short-acting beta-2 agonists.
  • Drugs that prolong the QT interval — all macrolides can prolong the QT interval, and caution is advised with concurrent use. Concurrent use is contraindicated with domperidone,dronedarone, ivabradine, mizolastine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide and terfenadine.
    • Hydroxychloroquine — The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advises caution.
  • Live cholera vaccines — the efficacy of the live vaccine may be affected. Avoid concurrent use and for 14 days before, and for 10 days after, live cholera vaccines.
  • Live typhoid vaccines — the immune response to the vaccine may be reduced. Antibacterials should be stopped from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccines.

[MHRA, 2020; Preston, 2023]

Erythromycin

Dose

  • Adults: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1–23 months: 125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–7 years: 250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 8–17 years: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe erythromycin to people with: 
    • Acute porphyrias.
    • A history of QT interval prolongation (congenital or acquired) or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including torsades de pointes.
    • Electrolyte disturbances (such as hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia) — due to the risk of arrhythmia associated with QT interval prolongation.
  • Prescribe erythromycin with caution to people with:
    • Predisposition to QT interval prolongation.
    • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances or clinically relevant bradycardia.
    • Hepatic impairment.
    • Myasthenia gravis.

[MHRA, 2020; EMC, 2023c; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) — diarrhoea, GI discomfort/disorders, nausea, vomiting, pancreatitis (common or very common); constipation (uncommon).
    • Rare or very rare: antibiotic-associated colitis.
  • Cardiovascular — QTc interval prolongation, torsades de pointes, palpitations and cardiac rhythm disorders, including ventricular tachyarrhythmias (uncommon).
  • Ear and labyrinth disorders — hearing impairment, tinnitus.
  • Hepatobiliary — cholestatic hepatitis, jaundice, hepatic disfunction, hepatomegaly, hepatic failure, hepatocellular hepatitis.
  • Skin and subcutaneous tissues — skin reactions (common or very common); Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiforme (uncommon); acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) (frequency unknown).
  • Other common adverse effects include:
    • Dizziness.
    • Headache.
    • Vasodilation.
    • Vision disorders.

[EMC, 2023c; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Aminophylline, theophylline — aminophylline can cause hypokalaemia (potentially increasing the risk of torsade de pointes) when given with erythromycin. Theophylline clearance (from aminophylline) can be reduced if given concurrently with erythromycin. Oral erythromycin exposure may be reduced by theophylline. Monitor theophylline levels after 48 hours and adjust the dose accordingly. Monitor potassium concentrations closely and the effects of oral erythromycin to ensure they are adequate. Consider giving an alternative antibiotic. 
  • Calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, diltiazem) — erythromycin possibly inhibits the metabolism of calcium channel blockers, increasing the risk of adverse effects, such as hypotension. Monitor for adverse effects (for example, bradycardia, hypotension, headache, oedema) and reduce the calcium channel blocker dose as necessary.
  • Rifampicin — may induce the metabolism of clarithromycin, resulting in sub-therapeutic levels.
    • If concurrent use is necessary, monitor erythromycin efficacy closely.
  • Carbamazepine — erythromycin can increase carbamazepine levels, causing carbamazepine toxicity (which may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Avoid concurrent use, unless carbamazepine levels can be monitored closely. 
  • Ciclosporin — levels are greatly increased by erythromycin. Monitor concentrations and effects (for example, renal function) more frequently if erythromycin is started or stopped. Adjust the ciclosporin dose as required. 
  • Cisapride, domperidone — levels may be raised, increasing the risk of potentially life-threatening arrhythmias (torsade de pointes). Concurrent use is contraindicated.
  • Colchicine — erythromycin possibly increases the risk of colchicine toxicity.
    • Stop or reduce the dose of colchicine.
    • Avoid concurrent use in renal or hepatic impairment.
  • Corticosteroids — levels of corticosteroids may be increased. Monitor for corticosteroid adverse effects (such as moon face, weight gain, hyperglycaemia), and adjust the corticosteroid dose or stop the macrolide as appropriate. 
  • Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as amiodarone, amisulpride, fluconazole, sildenafil, mizolastine, hydroxyzine) — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of arrhythmias (such as torsades de pointes).
    • Concurrent use of drugs that prolong the QT interval is contraindicated.
  • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, short-acting beta-2 agonists) — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation. Monitor potassium levels closely. 
  • Digoxin — erythromycin may increase the concentration of digoxin. 
    • Monitor digoxin concentration.
  • Edoxaban — erythromycin slightly increases edoxaban levels. Decrease dose of edoxaban to 30 mg once daily. Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding. 
  • Ergot alkaloids (such as ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) — concurrent use with erythromycin may result in acute ergot toxicity. 
    • Concurrent use is contraindicated.
  • Lomitapide — concurrent use with erythromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
  • Protease inhibitors (ritonavir, saquinavir) — erythromycin levels may be increased. Monitor for adverse effects. 
  • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy (due to cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 inhibition) [MHRA, 2014].    
    • Lovastatin, simvastatin  — concurrent use is contraindicated. If erythromycin treatment cannot be avoided, withhold the statin during the course of the treatment.
    • Atorvastatin — levels of atorvastatin increased slightly with concurrent use. Temporarily withhold the statin, or if necessary give the lowest dose of statin and advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
    • Pravastatin — prescribe erythromycin with caution, and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
  • Quetiapine — erythromycin increases the plasma concentration of quetiapine and both drugs are associated with QT interval prolongation.
    • Concurrent use is contraindicated, but if necessary, monitor for quetiapine adverse effects (for example, somnolence, dry mouth, tachycardia) and reduce the dose if needed.
  • Coumarin anticoagulants (such as warfarin) — erythromycin may cause a minor increase in warfarin effects. Consider increased monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. 
  • Live cholera vaccines — the efficacy of the live vaccine may be affected. Avoid concurrent use and for 14 days before, and for 10 days after, live cholera vaccines.
  • Live typhoid vaccines — the immune response to the vaccine may be reduced. Antibacterials should be stopped from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccines.

[MHRA, 2020; Preston, 2023]

Supporting evidence

CKS identified no evidence from controlled trials to support the use of any intervention for the management of paronychia. In the absence of trial evidence, recommendations have been made on the basis of expert opinion published in review articles [Leggit, 2017; Rerucha, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Dulski and Edwards, 2022; Relhan and Bansal, 2022], and from our reviewers, including the British Association of Dermatologists.

 

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of Paronychia - acute.

Search dates

May 2017 - August 2022

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • Paronychia/, paronychia.tw

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2019) SPC for Fucidin 20 mg/g cream. Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI). https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2020) Paronychia. British Medical Journal (BMJ). https://bestpractice.bmj.com [Free Full-text]
  • BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Dulski, A. and Edwards, C.W. (2022) Paronychia. StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • Durdu, M. and Ruocco, V. (2014) Clinical and cytologic features of antibiotic-resistant acute paronychia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 70(1), 120-126. [Abstract]
  • Rossi, A.M. and Jolanda van Zuuren, E. and Ehrlich, A. (2019) Paronychia. DynaMed. https://www.dynamed.com [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023a) SPC for Flucloxacillin 500 mg capsules, hard. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023b) SPC for Clarithromycin 250mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023c) SPC for erythromycin 250 mg gastro-resistant tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Finch, R.G, Greenwood, D., Norrby, S.R. and Whitley, R.J. (2003) Antibiotic and chemotherapy: anti-infective agents and their use in therapy. 8th edn. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Gupta, M.K. and Lipner, S.R. (2022) Review of chemotherapy-associated paronychia. Int J Dermatol 61(4), 410-415. [Abstract]
  • Hsu, A. and Hsu, J. (2012) Topical Review: Skin infections in the foot and ankle patient. Foot & Ankle International 33(7), 612-619. [Abstract]
  • Lee, D.K. and Lipner, S.R. (2022) Optimal diagnosis and management of common nail disorders. Ann Med 54(1), 694-712. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Leggit, J.C. (2017) Acute and chronic paronychia. American Family Physician 96(1), 44-51. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Lomax, A. and Thornton, J. Singh, D. (2016) Toenail paronychia. Foot and Ankle Surgery 22(4), 219-223. [Abstract]
  • Macneal, P. and Milroy, C. (2022) Paronychia drainage. StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2014) Statins: interactions, and updated advice for atorvastatin. Drug Safety Update 1(6), 2. [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2020) Erythromycin: caution required due to cardiac risks (QT interval prolongation); drug interaction with rivaroxaban. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2021) Safety of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Monica, P.W., Ishitsuka, Y., Kawakita, H., et al. (2019) Nail apparatus squamous cell carcinoma mimicking paronychia. J Dermatol 46(12), e460-e461. [Abstract]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and Public Health England (PHE) (2021) Managing common infections: guidance for primary care. Guidance for managing common infections, including upper and lower respiratory, and urinary tract infections. Vigilance, safety alerts and guidance. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Public Health England (2022) Summary of antimicrobial prescribing guidance – managing common infections. British National Formulary. https://www.bnf.org [Free Full-text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2015) Antimicrobial stewardship: systems and processes for effective antimicrobial medicine use. NICE Guideline [NG15]. NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2016) Antimicrobial stewardship. NICE Quality Standard [QS121]. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2017) Antimicrobial stewardship: changing risk-related behaviours in the general population. NICE Guideline [NG63]. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) (2022) Paronychia. PCDS. https://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Pierrart, J., Delgrande, D. and Mamane, W. et al. (2016) Acute felon and paronychia.  Antibiotics not necessary after surgical treatment. Prospective study of 46 patients. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 35(1), 40-43. [Abstract]
  • Piracinni, B.M. and Starace, M. (2014) Nail disorders in infants and children. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 26(4), 440-445. [Abstract]
  • Preston, C.L. (2023) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.new.medicinescomplete.com
  • UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) and the Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care (ASPIC) Group (2021) TARGET: Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education, Tools. RCGP. https://www.rcgp.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Ralhan, V. and Bansal, A. (2022) Acute and Chronic Paronychia Revisited: A Narrative Review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 15(1), 1-16. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Rerucha, C.M., Ewing, J.T., Oppenlander, K.E. and Cowan, W.C. (2019) Acute hand infections. American Family Physician 99(4), 228-236. [Abstract]
  • Riain,U.N. (2006) Primary care management of bacterial skin infections. Prescriber. 19(Aug), 15-21.
  • Shaw, J. and Body, R. (2005) Best evidence topic report. Incision and drainage preferable to oral antibiotics in acute paronychial nail infection? Emergency Medicine Journal 22(11), 813-814. [Abstract]
Change privacy settings