This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Infections and infestations Skin and nail

Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage

Last revised in February 2025

A boil is a deep inflammatory nodule with walled-off purulent material, arising from a hair follicle.

Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage: Summary

  • A boil is a deep inflammatory nodule with walled-off purulent material, arising from a hair follicle.
  • A carbuncle occurs when several adjacent boils join beneath the skin. It is an inflammatory mass that drains pus through many follicular orifices.
  • Most boils and carbuncles are caused by Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA).
  • Complications of boils and carbuncles include scarring and spread of infection such as cellulitis, and less commonly sepsis.
  • Urgent same-day incision and drainage should be arranged for all carbuncles and large and/or fluctuant boils. Small boils will usually drain spontaneously after application of moist heat.
  • Admission for intravenous antibiotics should be considered if the person:
    • Is systemically unwell.
    • Has cellulitis.
    • Has an infection in an area where complications can be serious (such as the face).
    • Is immunocompromised. 
  • If admission is not required:
    • Application of moist heat 3–4 times a day helps to alleviate pain and hasten draining of the pus.
    • The person should be advised to seek medical advice if the lesion becomes fluctuant, or they become systemically unwell.
    • Specialist advice should be sought if there is a possibility of PVL-SA.
    • A course of antibiotics (flucloxacillin first-line; erythromycin or clarithromycin if the person is allergic to penicillin) should be prescribed if there is cellulitis, fever, a facial lesion or severe pain; or there are other comorbidities, such as diabetes or immunosuppression.
    • Self-care advice should be offered.
  • If boils or carbuncles are recurrent, the lesion should be swabbed and the person treated with appropriate antibiotics for 7 days. If PVL-SA infection is suspected, this should be specifically mentioned on the laboratory form. If PVL-SA is confirmed, management should be discussed with microbiology.
  • Staphylococcal carriage (colonization) refers to the asymptomatic carriage of S. aureus on a person's skin or mucous membranes.
    • The most common site of colonization by S. aureus is the nose. 
  • Staphylococcal carriage is a risk factor for recurrent boils and carbuncles. 
  • Swabs of the nose should be taken to test for staphylococcal carriage if recurrent boils are in the facial area. If the recurrent boils are more extensive, swabs should also be taken from the perineum, groin, axilla, and umbilicus. 
  • If staphylococcal carriage is confirmed, the person should be prescribed treatment to promote nasal decolonization and advised on skin treatment. Decolonization should not be started until the acute infection has resolved. 
  • If there is a recurrence of boils or carbuncles despite treating staphylococcal carriage, management includes:
    • Consideration of extending swabbing to exclude carriage at other sites such as the perineum, groin, axillae, and umbilicus.
    • Specifically requesting testing for PVL-SA.
    • Identifying and treating potential sources of infection in the family and close contacts.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 1 month onwards.

This CKS topic covers the management of boils and carbuncles. It also covers the management of staphylococcal carriage.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of folliculitis, cellulitis, or cutaneous abscess.

There are separate CKS topics on Acne vulgaris, Candida - skin, Cellulitis - acute, Fungal nail infection, Fungal skin infection - body and groin, Fungal skin infection - foot, Fungal skin infection - scalp, Impetigo, MRSA in primary care, Otitis externa, Paronychia - acute, and Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic).

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

CKS gratefully acknowledges the contribution of the British Association of Dermatologists in the development of this topic.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

February 2025 — minor update. Duration of antibiotic treatment updated to 5–7 days.  

Previous changes

May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contra-indicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

December 2023 — minor update. Update to drug interactions section for erythromycin to include information on interactions with Lomitapide and Corticosteroids, as per the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

November 2023 — minor update. Interactions section for flucloxacillin updated in line with updated manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.

July 2022 — minor update. Information that Naspetin® was recently reformulated and no longer contains arachis oil (peanut oil) has been added to this topic in line with the updated Summary of Product Characteristics. 

February 2022 — minor update. Links to key therapeutic topic guidance removed as service has been retired.

March to May 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.

January 2021 — minor update. Contraindications and drug interactions for erythromycin have been updated in line with an MHRA drug safety update. 

November 2016 to January 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2016 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. Changes include: following treatment for staphylococcal carriage, three clear swabs over a 3-week period are required to confirm eradication. This recommendation was removed as repeat screening is not routinely recommended; for recurrent boils, the recommendation to treat with the appropriate antibiotic (according to swab results) for 10-14 days was changed to 7 days, in line with what CKS considers to be good clinical practice; the choice of antiseptics for use in staphylococcal decolonization was amended in line with PHE guidance.

July 2015 — minor update. The prescribing information sections on erythromycin and clarithromycin have been clarified.

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing. Issued in July 2011.

May 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. Issued in June 2011.

October 2010 to March 2011 —  topic revised. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

July 2007 — Oilatum Plus discontinued. Minor change to the text made and prescriptions removed. Issued in August 2007.

December 2006 to March 2007— converted topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

October 2006 — minor update. Analgesia prescriptions updated because new doses of ibuprofen for children are recommended by the British National Formulary. Issued in October 2006.

October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.

September 2003 — written. Validated in December 2003 and issued in February 2004.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 May 2021.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 May 2021.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 May 2021.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 May 2021.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 May 2021.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 May 2021.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 May 2021.

Changes in product availability

  • Secukinumab for treating moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. NICE recommends secukinumab as an option for treating active moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) in adults who have not responded well enough to conventional systemic treatment, only if adalimumab is not suitable, did not work or has stopped working. See more here.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Make a diagnosis of a boil or carbuncle.
  • Alleviate the symptoms of boils and carbuncles.
  • Limit the duration of infection and minimize the risks of complications of boils and carbuncles.
  • Refer people with boils or carbuncles when appropriate. 
  • Identify staphylococcal carriage and treat when appropriate.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What are boils and carbuncles?

  • A boil (or furuncle) is an infection of the hair follicle where there is purulent extension into the subcutaneous tissue, in which a small abscess forms. It is a deep-seated inflammatory nodule.
  • A carbuncle occurs when several adjacent boils join beneath the skin. It is an inflammatory mass that drains pus through many follicular orifices. 

[Ibler, 2014; Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016; PCDS, 2018; BAD, 2020; Troxell, 2020]

Which organisms cause boils and carbuncles?

  • Boils and carbuncles are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
    • Sometimes rarer strains of S. aureus, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA), may be involved.
  • Streptococcus pyogenes can also cause boils and carbuncles.
  • Occasionally, boils and carbuncles can be caused by anaerobic bacteria, particularly when they affect the anogenital area. Enteric species such as Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci may be involved at these sites.
  • Staphylococcal carriage, usually in the anterior nares, may be responsible for recurrent boils and carbuncles.

[Pasternack, 2010; Riain, 2013; Ibler, 2014; Verhoeven, 2014; Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016; Troxell, 2020]

How common are boils and carbuncles?

  • The incidence/prevalence of boils and carbuncles is uncertain. However:
    • Boils:
      • Are common in adolescents and young adults, especially if there are contributing factors, such as poor hygiene or overcrowded living conditions [Hedrick, 2003; Hay, 2004a].
      • Data from The Health Information Network (THIN) database in the UK suggests that in 2010 there were at least 280,000 primary care consultations for an abscess or boil [Shallcross, 2015a].
    • Carbuncles are less common and occur predominantly in men, usually in the middle or older age groups [Hay, 2004a].

What are the risk factors for boils and carbuncles?

  • Risk factors for the development of boils and carbuncles include:
    • Male sex.
    • Adolescence.
    • Close personal contact with an infected person, including healthcare personnel.
    • Participation in contact sports, such as wrestling.
    • Poor personal hygiene and living in overcrowded conditions.
    • Pre-existing skin lesion such as atopic eczema and abrasions.
    • Treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, such as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.
    • Blood dyscrasias and anaemia.
    • Immunocompromised states (including diabetes mellitus and HIV infection).
    • Obesity.
    • Malnutrition.
  • Risk factors for recurrent boils and carbuncles include:
    • Staphylococcal carriage including colonization with Panton-Valentin Leukocydin Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA). 
    • Diabetes.
    • Obesity.
    • Chronic skin disease.
    • Antibiotic use in the preceding 6 months.

[Hedrick, 2003; Ladhani, 2005; Stevens, 2005; Wertheim, 2005; Craft, 2012; Verhoeven, 2014; Ibler, 2014; Shallcross, 2015a; Mehraj, 2016]

What is the prognosis?

  • The time course of boils is variable but most heal without complications.
    • Some people go on to have repeated attacks of boils, usually in association with nasal colonization by Staphylococcus aureus.
      • Data from The Health Information Network (THIN) database in the UK suggests that in 2010, 10% of people who consulted a GP for a boil or abscess reconsulted for the same problem within 1 year.
  • For carbuncles, healing may be slow, leaving a scar.

[Hay, 2004a; Stevens, 2005; Craft, 2012; Shallcross, 2015a; Troxell, 2020]

What are the complications of boils and carbuncles?

Staphylococcal carriage

What is staphylococcal carriage?

  • Staphylococcal carriage (or colonization) refers to the asymptomatic carriage of Staphylococcus aureus on a person's skin or mucous membranes.
  • There are three patterns of S. aureus carriage:
    • Intermittent carriers.
    • Persistent carriers — have higher S. aureus loads and are at higher risk of getting S. aureus infections.
    • Non-carriers.
  • The most common site of colonization by S. aureus is the nose. Other sites include the axillae, groin, hands, perineum, and pharynx.  
  • The treatment of staphylococcal carriage is known as staphylococcal decolonization.

[Blaser, 2010; Craft, 2012; Verhoeven, 2014; Mehraj, 2016; Sakr, 2018]

How common is staphylococcal carriage?

  • The prevalence of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is unclear, as the studies carried out have produced different findings, at least in part due to differing definitions of the categories of carriage. However, overall, the data suggest:
    • Up to 37% of people are persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus.
    • Up to 69% of people are intermittent carriers.
  • Nasal carriage has been reported in: 
    • 10–15% of infants younger than 1 year of age — nasal colonization may occur within the first few days of life, with isolated strains usually identical to those found in the mother.
    • 38% of college students.
    • 50% of hospital physicians and military trainees.

[Craft, 2012; Mehraj, 2016; Sakr, 2018]

What are the risk factors for staphylococcal carriage?

  • Factors that may increase the risk of Staphylococcus aureus carriage include:
    • Being a healthcare worker.
    • Age under 30 or over 60 years.
    • Male sex.
    • Skin disease, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.
    • Health conditions such as HIV infection, diabetes mellitus, and liver dysfunction.
    • Obesity.
    • The use of hormonal contraception.
    • Recent antibiotic use.
    • Intravenous drug use.
    • A history of hospitalization or medical intervention (such as dialysis).
    • A household member being colonized.
    • Working with animals and livestock.

[Craft, 2012; Verhoeven, 2014; Mehraj, 2016; Sakr, 2018]

What are the complications of staphylococcal carriage?

  • Complications of staphylococcal carriage include:
    • Skin and soft tissue infections, such as impetigo, boils, and cutaneous abscess [Patel, 2015; Sakr, 2018].
    • Surgical site infections [Sakr, 2018].
    • Recurrent skin and soft tissue infections — recurrence rates are higher in people with staphylococcal carriage [Ibler, 2014; Verhoeven, 2014].
    • Invasive infections. These are rare, and include bacteraemia, sepsis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and septic arthritis [Wertheim, 2005; Patel, 2015; Mehraj, 2016].
    • Nosocomial infections. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus has been shown to be a risk factor in the development of nosocomial infections, such as S. aureus sepsis [Verhoeven, 2014; Mehraj, 2016].
  • Panton-Valentine leukocidin S. aureus (PVL-SA) is rarely isolated from nasal samples but is associated with recurrent boils and carbuncles, and serious complications including necrotizing pneumonia, necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and purpura fulminans [HPA, 2008; Mehraj, 2016].

Diagnosis of boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage

How do I know my patient has a boil?

Diagnosis is made by identifying clinical features of boils and ruling out conditions that mimic boils.

  • Boils initially appear as firm, tender, erythematous nodules, which after several days enlarge and become painful and fluctuant (a wave-like feeling on palpating skin overlying a fluid-filled cavity with non-rigid walls).
  • Ask the person about:
    • Duration and progression of symptoms.  
    • Site(s) of lesions. Boils occur in hair-bearing sites, especially those subject to friction or perspiration, such as the face, neck, axilla, or buttocks.
    • The presence of systemic symptoms. Occasionally the person has mild constitutional symptoms, such as fever. 
  • Examine the person.
    • Observe the lesion(s). Boils may be single or occur in groups, and can range from pea-sized to golf ball-sized. 
    • Assess for the presence of discharging pus and fluctuance. 
      • A fluctuant lesion feels 'boggy', and the overlying skin has a shiny appearance.
      • Boils may rupture spontaneously, draining pus or necrotic material. They heal (over several days to several weeks) to leave a violaceous macule, and possibly a permanent scar.
    • Check for surrounding cellulitis.
    • Check the person's temperature, pulse, and blood pressure if clinically indicated. 

Basis for recommendation

This information on the diagnosis of boils is based on expert opinion in medical textbooks [Hay, 2004a; Craft, 2012], the guideline Folliculitis and boils (furuncles/carbuncles) from the Primary Care Dermatological Society [PCDS, 2018], and review articles [Ladhani, 2005; Riain, 2013; Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016].

Clinical presentation of a carbuncle

Diagnosis is made by identifying clinical features of carbuncles and ruling out conditions that mimic carbuncles.

  • A carbuncle appears as a large, hard, red, dome-shaped, very painful lump that increases in size over a few days.
    • Pus may drain from many follicular orifices.
    • Carbuncles soon develop a yellow-grey irregular crater centrally, caused by necrosis of the intervening skin.
    • They heal slowly, often leaving a permanent scar.
  • Ask the person about:
    • Duration and progression of symptoms.
    • Site of lesion. Carbuncles usually occur at the nape of the neck, the back, and thighs.
    • The presence of systemic symptoms. High fever and malaise are often present. Regional lymphadenopathy may be reported/observed.
  • Examine the person:
    • Observe the lesion and assess for the presence of discharging pus and fluctuance. See Clinical presentation of a boil for more information.
    • Check for surrounding cellulitis.
    • Check the person's temperature, pulse, and blood pressure.

Basis for recommendation

The information on diagnosis of a carbuncle is based on expert opinion in medical textbooks [Hay, 2004a; Craft, 2012], review articles [Ladhani, 2005; Riain, 2013; Troxell, 2020], and Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Stevens, 2014a].

What else might it be?

  • Conditions that may resemble a boil or carbuncle include:
    • Cystic acne — associated with nodules, papules, and comedones and usually confined to the face and trunk.
    • Dental abscess — causing swelling of the face.
    • Epidermoid cyst (ruptured) — a round, unilocular cyst of the dermis that is lined by epidermis and contains sebum and keratin. These are frequently seen in severe acne. They may become inflamed and tender intermittently and discharge pus.
    • Folliculitis — a superficial infection of the hair follicles, which develop into small inflammatory papules or pustules. 
    • Hidradenitis suppurativa — a chronic inflammatory suppurative disease of the apocrine sweat glands causing painful, inflamed nodules and sterile abscesses. Consider this if only the groin and the axillae are involved.
  • Rare conditions that may resemble a boil or carbuncle include:
    • Anthrax — can resemble a carbuncle, but lesions have a distinctive haemorrhagic crust and vesicular margin.
    • Atypical mycobacterial infection — initially there is a solitary nodule or a pustule that may form an ulcer or abscess. Lesions are often multiple. The source of infection is often a swimming pool or a tropical fish tank.
    • Ecthyma — small bullae or pustules on a reddish base are soon covered by a hard crust of dried exudate which increases in size. The base may become hard, and the lesion is often surrounded by a red, swollen areola. Removal of the crust is difficult and reveals an irregular purulent ulcer. Healing occurs after a few weeks, leaving a scar. Ecthyma is associated with poor hygiene and malnutrition. The most common organisms are group A streptococci and coagulase-positive staphylococci.
    • Kerion — a raised, boggy lesion of the scalp. It is due to an intense inflammatory reaction to ringworm which is then secondarily infected. There may be follicles discharging pus and formation of sinuses, and sometimes a large confluent lesion may involve a large part of the scalp.
    • Myiasis — this is a caused by subcutaneous larval invasion by the tumbu fly in Africa (lesions on buttocks and trunk), and the botfly in subtropical and tropical areas of the Americas (lesions on the scalp, face, and extremities). The larvae form and develop within a boil-like swelling 1–2 cm in diameter.
    • Orf — is caused by parapoxvirus and is often associated with contact with sheep or goats. It presents as a small, firm, painful, red or red-blue lump that enlarges to form a flat-topped, blood-tinged pustule or blister that is usually 2–3 cm in diameter but may be as large as 5 cm across. Lesions usually occur on the hands, fingers, and forearms.
    • Osteomyelitis — on an arm or leg, the most distal portion of a fistulous tract from an underlying osteomyelitis may resemble a boil.

Basis for recommendation

Information on the differential diagnoses of boils and carbuncles is based on expert opinion from textbooks and review articles, which collectively provide details about the clinical features of atypical mycobacteria infections [Yates, 2004], cystic acne [Craft, 2012; Troxell, 2020], dental abscess and osteomyelitis [Craft, 2012; Troxell, 2020], epidermoid cyst [Pugh, 2000; MacKie, 2004], folliculitis [Sladden, 2004], hidradenitis suppurativa [Layton, 2010; Ibler, 2014; Troxell, 2020], ecthyma and anthrax [Hay, 2004a], kerion [Pugh, 2000; Hay, 2004b], myiasis [Diaz, 2010], and orf [Sterling, 2004; Warrell, 2010; Troxell, 2020].

Management

Scenario: Boils and carbuncles

From age 1 month onwards.

When should I admit or refer a person with a boil or carbuncle?

  • Assess for the presence of discharging pus and fluctuance.
    • In early infection, it may be difficult to decide whether pus is present.
  • Arrange for urgent same-day incision and drainage for:
    • All large and/or fluctuant boils.
    • All carbuncles.
  • Incision and drainage may sometimes be performed in primary care if the lesion is small and the expertise and facilities are available. Otherwise, the person should be referred to a surgical unit or emergency department, according to local protocol.
    • If incision and drainage are carried out in primary care, the lesion should be covered with a sterile dressing afterwards, as this helps to prevent autoinoculation. Consider taking swabs of pus from the lesion and initiating antibiotic therapy, depending on clinical judgement.
  • Consider admission for intravenous antibiotics if the person:
    • Is systemically unwell.
    • Has cellulitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute.
    • Has an infection in an area where complications can be serious (such as the face).
    • Is immunocompromised as a result of an underlying disease (such as diabetes) or medication (such as corticosteroids).

Basis for recommendation

Admission and referral
  • The recommendations on when to admit or refer a person with a boil or carbuncle are based on expert opinion in a review article [Esposito, 2016] and are also pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
    • The decision on whether to urgently refer or admit the person will depend on clinical judgement, taking into account factors including systemic symptoms; the rapidity and degree of spread; any underlying medical conditions, particularly those associated with immunosuppression; and whether the person (or carer) is able to follow instructions reliably regarding monitoring of complications.
Incision and drainage
  • Incision and drainage of all large/fluctuant boils and all carbuncles is recommended on the basis of expert opinion in the Infectious Diseases Society of America Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections [Stevens, 2014a] and the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Surgical Infection Society Europe (SIS-E) Consensus conference: recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections [Sartelli et al, 2018]. The first of these guidelines recommends covering the drained lesion with a dry dressing [Stevens, 2014b].
  • Expert opinion in a number of review articles also advocates incision and drainage as first-line treatment for boils and carbuncles [Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016; Clebak, 2018; Troxell, 2020].

When should I take a swab from a person with a boil or carbuncle?

  • Consider taking a swab of pus from the contents of the lesion if:
    • The boil or carbuncle is:
      • Not responding to treatment.
      • Persistent or recurrent, to exclude atypical mycobacteria or Panton-Valentine leukocidin Staphylococcus aureus (PVL-SA).
    • There are multiple lesions.
    • The person:
      • Is immunocompromised.
      • Is known to be colonized with MRSA.
      • Has diabetes.
      • Is a member of a household, or resides in an institutional setting, where recurrent outbreaks of skin and soft tissue infections have been reported (to exclude PVL-SA).
  • If PVL-SA is suspected, this should be mentioned specifically on the laboratory form.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on when to swab are based on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.

How should I manage a person in primary care?

For people not requiring referral or admission:

  • Advise them: 
    • To apply moist heat three to four times a day to alleviate pain, localize the infection, and hasten the drainage of pus. 
    • That a small boil may drain spontaneously — once this has occurred, the lesion should be covered with a sterile dressing to help prevent autoinoculation.
    • To seek medical advice if the lesion becomes fluctuant, as it may require incision and drainage.
    • To seek urgent medical advice if they become systemically unwell or develop cellulitis.
  • Seek specialist advice if there is a possibility or confirmation of:
    • PVL-SA — suspect particularly in people with severe or recurrent boils, or who reside in a household or institutional setting (such as a care home or prison) where outbreaks of boils/carbuncles have been noted.
    • MRSA — suspect if the person has been hospitalized within the last year, has a chronic illness requiring healthcare visits, has a history of MRSA infection, resides in an institutional setting, or has had contact with a person known to have MRSA.
  • Prescribe a course of oral antibiotics if the person:
    • Has a fever.
    • Has cellulitis (see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute).
    • The lesion is on the face.
    • Is in pain or severe discomfort.
    • There are other comorbidities (such as diabetes or immunosuppression).
      • Flucloxacillin is recommended first line (erythromycin [preferred in pregnancy and breastfeeding] or clarithromycin are alternatives if the person has a true allergy to penicillin). For further information on prescribing antibiotics, see prescribing information.
  • Give information and self-care advice. Offer written information, such as the British Association of Dermatologists' patient information leaflet on boils. Advise the person to:
    • Take paracetamol or ibuprofen as required for pain relief. For more information, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
    • Maintain good personal hygiene.
    • Wash hands carefully after contact with lesions.
    • Wash and tumble dry underclothes, bed linen, and towels at a high temperature daily (if possible) to prevent spreading the infection to other parts of their body, or to other people.
    • Use a separate face cloth and towel.
    • Wear loose-fitting, lightweight clothes as much as possible.
    • Keep wounds or grazes clean and covered with sterile gauze until they heal.
    • Seal and discard used gauze or dressings immediately. If purulent drainage collects, gauze or dressings should be changed frequently.
    • Not participate in contact sports, or visit a swimming pool or gym until the boil has cleared, to avoid passing the infection on to others.

Basis for recommendation

Application of moist heat to aid drainage
  • This recommendation is based on expert opinion in Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections, published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Stevens, 2014a], a medical textbook [Craft, 2012], and a clinical review [Riain, 2013]. 
When to seek medical advice
  • These recommendations are pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice.
Seeking specialist advice for possible or confirmed infection with PVL-SA or MRSA
  • These recommendations are largely based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice.
    • Previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic from the British Association of Dermatologists emphasized the importance of considering infection with PVL-SA in people with severe or recurrent boils.
    • The information on when to suspect PVL-SA is based on expert opinion in an archived Health Protection Agency (HPA) document Diagnosis and management of PVL-Staphylococcus aureus infections: quick reference guide for primary care [HPA, 2008].
    • The information on when to suspect MRSA is based on expert opinion in the BMJ Best Practice guideline Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [BMJ Best Practice, 2021].
Antibiotic treatment
  • The recommendations on when to consider prescribing antibiotics are based on expert opinion in the medical literature [Ladhani, 2005; Craft, 2012; Stevens, 2014a; Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016].
    • Antibiotic treatment is generally considered unnecessary unless fever or signs of systemic infection are present [Stevens, 2014a] or there is spreading cellulitis [Sukumaran and Senanayake, 2016]. 
    • Expert opinion of previous reviewers of this CKS topic suggests that antibiotics should be also be considered if the lesion is large (for example a carbuncle), there are other comorbidities (for example diabetes), or complications are more likely because of the site (for example cavernous sinus thrombosis can result from boils on the face). For more information, see Complications.
    • Most cases can be treated in primary care provided the person is closely monitored for signs of systemic upset.
  • The recommendations on the choice of antibiotics are extrapolated from guidelines on the treatment of cellulitis in the Public Health England (PHE) and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) document Summary of antimicrobial prescribing guidance – managing common infections [PHE, 2021] and expert opinion in the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021] and review articles [Stulberg, 2002; Finch, 2003; Riain, 2013].
    • Flucloxacillin is recommended as first-line treatment because it has a narrow spectrum of activity and is active against Gram-positive cocci, including staphylococci and beta-haemolytic streptococci [Riain, 2013].
    • Erythromycin and clarithromycin are suitable alternatives to flucloxacillin in people who have a true allergy to penicillin. They are macrolide antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity against most sensitive Gram-positive cocci (including staphylococci and streptococci) [Riain, 2013].
    • Clarithromycin is generally better tolerated than erythromycin [Riain, 2013], and also has a more convenient dosing regimen [BNF, 2021].
    • Erythromycin is preferred for pregnant and breastfeeding women as there is more experience with its use than with clarithromycin and most studies do not suggest an association with erythromycin use in pregnancy and adverse effects on the fetus [UKTIS, 2020]. Only small amounts of erythromycin are present in breastmilk and it is not known to be harmful [BNF, 2021].
  • The recommendations on duration of antibiotic treatment are extrapolated from guidelines on the treatment of cellulitis in the Public Health England (PHE) and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) document Summary of antimicrobial prescribing guidance – managing common infections [PHE, 2021], which recommends use of an antibiotic for 5–7 days. 
Self-care advice
  • Self-care recommendations are based on expert opinion in Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue Infections, published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Stevens, 2014a], a medical textbook [Craft, 2012], and a patient information leaflet published by the British Association of Dermatologists [BAD, 2020].
    • Good personal hygiene will reduce the number of S. aureus organisms on the skin and prevent re-infection.
    • A large number of staphylococci are frequently present on sheets and clothes of people with boils (or carbuncles). Carefully washing clothes and sheets, and not sharing clothes and towels, may reduce the chances of re-infection or the chances of spreading the infection to friends and family members.
    • Used dressings and gauze should be discarded appropriately to avoid spreading the infection further. Frequent changing of dressings, especially if purulent drainage collects, is recommended for the same reason.

How should I manage recurrent boils and carbuncles?

  • Exclude and manage other underlying causes where appropriate, for example:
  • Ask the person whether they have had close personal contact with an infected person, such as a family member, or through contact sports.
  • Ask the person whether they or a family member works in a hospital or other healthcare setting, as recurrence could be due to staphylococcal carriage.
  • Swab the lesion (to confirm the causative organism and antibiotic sensitivities) and treat with the appropriate antibiotic for 7 days. For futher information, see the section on Acute boils and carbuncles.
  • If PVL-SA infection is suspected, specifically mention this on the laboratory form. 
    • If staphylococcal infection is confirmed, check for carriage of S. aureus and manage accordingly. See Scenario: Staphylococcal carriage.
    • If the person is already known to have MRSA infection or the swab sample of pus grows MRSA, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care for further information.
    • If PVL-SA infection is confirmed, management should be discussed with microbiology or the local infection control team.
  • Reinforce self-care advice where appropriate.

Basis for recommendation

Underlying conditions
  • The recommendation to identify and manage underlying conditions (including staphylococcal carriage) that may predispose the person to recurrent boils and carbuncles is based on expert opinion in medical textbooks [Blaser, 2010; Hay, 2010; Pasternack, 2010; Craft, 2012] and on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.
Risk factors for recurrent boils and carbuncles
  • Expert opinion is that close contact with a family member with an infected lesion or through contact sports is a risk factor for recurrent boils [Craft, 2012; Ibler, 2014].
  • The advice that work in a healthcare setting may be associated with recurrent boils and carbuncles is based on expert opinion in medical textbooks [Hay, 2004a; Blaser, 2010; Craft, 2012], a review article [Ibler, 2014], and on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.
Swabbing the lesion
  • The recommendations on swabbing recurrent boils and carbuncles are based on expert opinion in Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections, published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Stevens, 2014a], as well as the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.

Scenario: Staphylococcal carriage

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I swab for staphylococcal carriage?

  • Where staphylococcal carriage is suspected:
    • Take swabs from the contents of the boil or carbuncle.
    • If recurrent boils or carbuncles are localized to the facial area, swab the nasal cavity.
    • If the boils or carbuncles are more extensive, consider swabbing the perineum, groin, axillae, and umbilicus in addition to the nose. 

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections, published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Stevens, 2014a], a review article [Ibler, 2014], and the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.

How should I decolonize a person with confirmed staphylococcal carriage?

  • Do not start decolonization until acute infection has resolved.
  • Ensure that the person understands preventative measures to reduce the risks of future infections following decolonization.
  • Eliminate nasal carriage by prescribing Naseptin® cream (chlorhexidine plus neomycin), four times a day for 10 days. Be aware that Naseptin® contains arachis oil (peanut oil) and should not be used by a person known to be allergic to peanuts or soya.
    • If Naseptin® cream is unsuitable or not effective, consider prescribing mupirocin nasal ointment, three times daily for 5 days.
      • Note: Naspetin® has recently been reformulated and no longer contains arachis oil (peanut oil). However, if this is prescribed, advise people to check the formulation before using as the previous formulation may still be in the supply chain.   
    • If both mupirocin and Naseptin® are ineffective, seek expert advice.
  • If the person has a confirmed PVL skin infection, discuss their management with microbiology or the local infection control team.
  • All people requiring decolonization should be advised about treatment for the skin:
    • Use an antiseptic preparation (such as chlorhexidine 4% body wash/shampoo or Triclosan 2%) daily as liquid soap in the bath, shower, or sink for 5 days.
      • Avoid diluting beforehand in water as this will reduce its efficacy.
      • Apply directly to wet (never dry) skin on a disposable wipe or by using the hand.
      • Allow it to remain on the skin for about 1 minute.
      • Rinse off thoroughly and dry skin well.
      • Additionally, use as a shampoo on the first, third, and fifth day.
      • Avoid using regular soap in addition to the antiseptic during baths/showers.
      • Pay particular attention to the axillae, groins, buttocks, under the breasts, and the hands.
  • If a person with a dermatological condition, such as eczema, requires treatment for the skin, seek a dermatological opinion.
  • Whilst the skin treatment is being used for 5 days, advise the person to reduce the household spread of staphylococcus by:
    • Changing sheets and towels daily. Wash sheets, towels, and underwear regularly on a hot wash cycle (above 55°C). The clothes should be turned inside out and the machine not overloaded so that the water can circulate.
    • Vacuuming and dusting regularly, particularly in the bedrooms.
    • Using pump-action liquid soap and avoiding bar soaps.
    • Using his or her own towel and flannel, and rinsing the flannel in hot water before use.
    • Cleaning the sinks and bath with a disposable cloth and detergent after use and rinsing clean.

Which antiseptic preparation should I prescribe?

  • A solution of chlorhexidine 4% or triclosan 1–2% is generally suitable. For example:
    • Hibiscrub® and Hydrex® Surgical Scrub.
    • Oilatum® plus.
  • Consider Dermol® for people with skin conditions or delicate skin.
    • This is less likely to irritate the skin, although contact sensitization to the antiseptic component may still occur with prolonged use.
  • Consider seeking a dermatological opinion for people with skin conditions. 

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on decolonization are largely extrapolated from an archived Health Protection Agency (HPA) document Diagnosis and management of PVL-Staphylococcus aureus infections: quick reference guide for primary care [HPA, 2008], which details the decolonization procedure for a person with PVL-SA, and are also supported by expert opinion in a review article [Ibler, 2014] and the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists.

First-line use of Naseptin® for nasal decolonization
  • The recommendation to use Naseptin® cream first line is based on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists. The British National Formulary also recommends that mupirocin should be used only if Naseptin® is unsuitable or ineffective [BNF, 2021].
  • The recommendation to seek specialist advice if both mupirocin and Naseptin® are ineffective is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
  • The manufacturer recommends that Naseptin® is avoided in people with peanut allergies because it contains arachis oil. As there is a possible relationship between allergy to peanut and allergy to soya, people with soya allergy should also avoid using Naseptin® [ABPI, 2017].
    • Note: Naspetin® has recently been reformulated and no longer contains arachis oil (peanut oil). However, if this is prescribed, advise people to check the formulation before using as the previous formulation may still be in the supply chain.   
Discussing the management of confirmed PVL skin infection with microbiology or the local infection control team
  • This recommendation is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

What should I do if there is still recurrence of boils or carbuncles despite treating staphylococcal carriage?

  • Enquire about whether any family member is a hospital or healthcare worker.
  • If there are recurrent boils or carbuncles consider:
    • Excluding underlying causes.
    • Extending swabbing to exclude carriage at other sites such as perineum, groin, axillae, and umbilicus, if only the nose was initially swabbed.
    • Specifically requesting testing for PVL-SA.
    • Identifying and treating potential sources of infection in the family and close contacts.
    • Screening household members if they are willing to co-operate with an eradication strategy. However, this may be difficult to organize in primary care.
  • If the person has MRSA, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care for further information.
  • If the person has PVL-SA infection, discuss with microbiology or the local infection control team.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on management of further recurrence are based on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists, and are supported by expert opinion in a review article [Ibler, 2014], and on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

What should I advise about prevention of further staphylococcal reinfection?

  • Advise the person to:
    • Take a daily shower or bath.
    • Wash hands regularly with soap and water.
    • Change clothes and underclothes regularly.
    • Avoid sharing towels, face cloths, razors, toothbrushes, and water bottles.
    • Wash sports clothes after use each time.
    • Use disposable tissues to blow their nose and avoid picking their nose.
    • In saunas and gyms, to sit on a clean towel and wash the towel after use.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on prevention of reinfection are largely extrapolated from an archived Health Protection Agency (HPA) document Diagnosis and management of PVL-Staphylococcus aureus infections: quick reference guide for primary care [HPA, 2008], which includes advice to prevent spread for a person with PVL-SA. They are also supported by expert opinion in a review article [Ibler, 2014] and a patient information leaflet on boils from the British Association of Dermatologists [BAD, 2020].

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Flucloxacillin

Dose

  • Adults: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 1 year: 62.5–125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–9 years: 125–250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 10–17 years: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe flucloxacillin to people with:
    • A true penicillin allergy — gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (for example nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin.
    • History of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution to people with: 
    • Hepatic dysfunction (not flucloxacillin-related), especially if they are 50 years of age or older, or have a serious underlying medical condition.
    • Severe renal impairment — reduce the dose if the person's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2.

[ABPI, 2021a; BNF, 2021]

Adverse effects

  • Diarrhoea is a common adverse effect of flucloxacillin.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with flucloxacillin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridium difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Cholestatic jaundice and hepatitis may occur (very rarely) up to several weeks after treatment with flucloxacillin has been stopped. Risk factors include treatment for more than 2 weeks and increasing age.

[ABPI, 2021a; BNF, 2021]

Drug interactions

  • Methotrexate — methotrexate clearance may be reduced, causing an increased risk of toxicity, however, serious interactions are uncommon. 
    • Standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination in people on high-dose regimens. For people on low-dose regimens, consult local or national guidelines/protocols for monitoring and management.
  • Coumarin and indanedione anticoagulants (warfarin, phenidione) — consider increased monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the dose accordingly.
  • Posaconazole, voriconazole — concentrations of antifungal is greatly decreased. If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue). 
  • Probenecid — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of flucloxacillin.
  • Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
  • Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.

[Preston, 2023]

Clarithromycin

Dose

  • Adults: 250–500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 11 years with body weight:
      • Less than 8 kg: 7.5 mg per kg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 8–11 kg: 62.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 12–19 kg: 125 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 20–29 kg: 187.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 30–40 kg: 250 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
    • 12 years and over:  250–500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
    • Known hypersensitivity to clarithromycin or other macrolide antibiotics.
    • A history of QT prolongation (congenital or acquired) or ventricular arrhythmia, including Torsade de Pointes.
    • Hypokalaemia.
    • Severe hepatic failure in combination with renal impairment.
  • Clarithromycin is also contraindicated for people taking certain drugs. 
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution in people with:
    • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances, or clinically relevant bradycardia — increased risk of QT prolongation.
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver. Hepatic dysfunction including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice) has been rarely reported with clarithromycin.
    • Moderate to severe renal impairment — use half the dose if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Avoid Klaricid XL® (clarithromycin 500 mg prolonged-release once daily tablets) or other modified-release clarithromycin preparations in people with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. 
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation, such as electrolyte disturbances (for example hypomagnesemia) and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of Torsades de Pointes arrhythmia. 
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate weakness symptoms of people with myasthenia gravis.

[EMC, 2025a; ABPI, 2021b; ABPI, 2021c; BNF, 2021]

Adverse effects

  • Clarithromycin is generally well tolerated. 
  • The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal — such as nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and diarrhoea.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with clarithromycin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridium difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Less common adverse effects include rash and hepatoxicity.
  • Very rarely, QT prolongation, ventricular tachycardia, and Torsade de Pointes arrhythmia have been reported.

[EMC, 2025a; BNF, 2021]

Drug interactions

  • Drug interactions with clarithromycin include:
    • Pimozide — do not prescribe with clarithromycin as concurrent use may result in QT prolongation, cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and Torsade de Pointes.
    • Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine — do not prescribe with clarithromycin as concurrent use may result in acute ergot toxicity. 
    • Colchicine — avoid concomitant administration.
    • Carbamazepine — monitor carbamazepine levels within 3–5 days of starting clarithromycin, and adjust dose accordingly. Clarithromycin can increase carbamazepine levels, causing carbamazepine toxicity (may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
    • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contra-indicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
    • Other drugs that prolong the QT interval — if possible, avoid giving clarithromycin to a person who is already taking a drug that can potentially prolong the QT interval.
    • Ranolazine — avoid concomitant administration. Clarithromycin possibly increases plasma concentrations of ranolazine.
    • Ticagrelor — avoid concomitant administration. Clarithromycin possibly increases the plasma concentration of ticagrelor.
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy.
      • For simvastatin — do not prescribe clarithromycin to a person taking simvastatin. Consider temporarily stopping simvastatin during short-term treatment with clarithromycin. 
      • For atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin if possible. Consider temporarily stopping atorvastatin during short-term treatment with clarithromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (10 mg), and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • For pravastatin — prescribe clarithromycin with caution and advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • Other statins — clinically significant interaction with clarithromycin is not expected for rosuvastatin and fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Warfarin — increase monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. Clarithromycin may enhance the effect of warfarin. 
    • Oral hypoglycaemic drugs and insulin — the concurrent use of clarithromycin and antidiabetic drugs (such as sulphonylureas and/or insulin) can result in significant hypoglycaemia.
      • Monitor blood glucose levels more regularly and adjust the antidiabetic drug (and/or insulin) dose accordingly. 
    • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — due to an increased risk of hypotension, caution is advised with the concurrent use of clarithromycin and CCBs metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem).
    • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, short-acting beta-2 agonists) — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
    • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of clarithromycin.
      • However, women should be advised about the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment.

[CoSRH, 2019; BNF, 2021; Preston, 2021; EMC, 2024]

Erythromycin

Doses

  • Adults: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1–23 months: 125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–7 years: 250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 8–17 years: 250–500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe erythromycin to people with:
    • Porphyria or a known hypersensitivity to erythromycin.
    • A history of QT interval prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia.
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation such as electrolyte disturbances and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of Torsades de Pointes arrhythmia.
  • Prescribe erythromycin with caution in people with:
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — erythromycin is principally excreted by the liver. 
    • Renal impairment — give a maximum of 1.5 g daily in severe renal impairment due to the risk of ototoxicity. 
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate weakness symptoms of people with myasthenia gravis.

 [EMC, 2025b; MHRA, 2020; BNF, 2021]

Adverse effects

  • Gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea are common in people taking erythromycin.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with erythromycin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridium difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Hepatic dysfunction including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice) has been rarely reported with this drug.

[EMC, 2025b; BNF, 2021]

Drug interactions

  • Drug interactions with erythromycin include:
    • Tolterodine, mizolastine, amisulpride, domperidone, ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, or pimozide — concurrent administration with erythromycin is contraindicated.
    • Cimetidine — monitor concurrent use closely as a dose reduction of erythromycin may be necessary. Cimetidine may inhibit the metabolism of erythromycin, leading to an increased plasma concentration.
    • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — due to an increased risk of hypotension, caution is advised with the concurrent use of erythromycin and CCBs metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil).
    • Colchicine — avoid concurrent use if possible. Colchicine toxicity has been reported following concomitant use with erythromycin.
    • Carbamazepine — avoid concurrent use unless carbamazepine levels can be closely monitored and suitable dose reductions made. Erythromycin can increase carbamazepine levels by as much as five-fold, causing carbamazepine toxicity (which may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Corticosteroids — levels of corticosteroids may be increased. Monitor for corticosteroid adverse effects (such as moon face, weight gain, hyperglycaemia), and adjust the corticosteroid dose or stop the macrolide as appropriate. 
    • Drugs that prolong the QT interval — if possible, avoid giving erythromycin to a person who is already taking a drug that can potentially prolong the QT interval.
    • Lomitapide — concurrent use with erythromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy.
      • For simvastatin — do not prescribe erythromycin to a person taking simvastatin. Consider temporarily stopping simvastatin during short-term treatment with erythromycin. 
      • For atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with erythromycin if possible. Consider temporarily stopping atorvastatin during short-term treatment with erythromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (10 mg), and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • For pravastatin — prescribe erythromycin with caution and advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • Other statins — clinically significant interaction with erythromycin is not expected for rosuvastatin and fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Theophylline — consider using clarithromycin (in preference to erythromycin) as clarithromycin normally causes only modest (clinically unimportant) increases in theophylline levels.
      • Concurrent use of erythromycin with high doses of theophylline may be associated with an increase in serum theophylline levels and potential theophylline toxicity (which may present as palpitations, nausea, tremor, and headache). If this is suspected, reduce the dose of theophylline. 
      • Concurrent treatment may also result in a significant decrease in erythromycin serum concentrations, leading to sub-therapeutic concentrations of erythromycin.
    • Rivaroxaban — erythromycin may increase levels of rivaroxaban, increasing the risk of bleeding. 
    • Warfarin — monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. Erythromycin may enhance the effect of warfarin; this is an established but unpredictable interaction.
    • Zopiclone — monitor concurrent use. Erythromycin has been reported to decrease the clearance of zopiclone and this may lead to an increase in the effects of zopiclone. 
    • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of erythromycin.
      • However, women should be advised about the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the CKS topic Contraception - assessment.

[CoSRH, 2019; EMC, 2025b; MHRA, 2020; Preston, 2021]

Supporting evidence

CKS identified no evidence from controlled trials to guide the management of boils or carbuncles. This CKS topic is therefore largely based on expert opinion in review articles and medical textbooks, and on the opinion of previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic, including individuals from the British Association of Dermatologists. The rationale for the assessment, referral, and primary care management of people with boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of boils and carbuncles.

Search dates

November 2016 - March 2021

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp Furunculosis/ 
  • exp folliculitis/
  • exp carbuncle/
  • carbuncle*.ti,ab,kw.
  • (boil* or furuncle* or furunculos*).ti,ab,kw.
  • (recurrent furunculosis) or (skin abscess*) or (recurrent boil*).ti,ab,kw.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2017) SPC for Naseptin Nasal Cream. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021a) SPC for Flucloxacillin 500mg capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021b) SPC for Klaricid 125mg/5ml Paediatric Suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021c) SPC for Klaricid XL 500 mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • BAD (2020) Boils. British Association of Dermatologists. http://www.bad.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Blaser,M.J. (2010) Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. In: Mandell,G.L., Bennett,J.E., Dolin,R. (Eds.) Introduction to bacteria and bacterial diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.., 2539-2578.
  • BMJ Best Practice (2021) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). London: BMJ Publishing Group.
  • BNF (2021) British National Formulary. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Clebak, K.T. and Malone, M.A. (2018) Skin Infections. Primary Care 45(3), 433-454. [Abstract]
  • CoSRH (2019) Drug interactions with hormonal contraception. Faculty of Reproductive and Sexual Healthcare. http://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
  • Craft, N. (Eds.) (2012) Superficial cutaneous infections and pyodermas. In: Fitzpatrick's dermatology in general medicine. 8th edn. London: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2128-2137.
  • Diaz, J.H. (2010) Myiasis and tungiasis. In: Mandell, G.L., Bennett, J.E. and Dolin, R. (Eds.) Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 3637-3641.
  • EMC (2024) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg/5 ml granules for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
  • EMC (2025a) SPC for Clarithromycin 250 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2025b) SPC for Erythromycin 250 mg gastro-resistant tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Esposito, S., Bassetti, M., Bonnet, E., et al. (2016) Hot topics in the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 48(1), 19-26. [Abstract]
  • Finch, R.G, Greenwood, D., Norrby, S.R. and Whitley, R.J. (2003) Antibiotic and chemotherapy: anti-infective agents and their use in therapy. 8th edn. London: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Hay, R.J. and Adriaans, B.M. (2004a) Bacterial infections. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
  • Hay, R.J. and Moore, M.K. (2004b) Mycology. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 31.1-31.101.
  • Hay, R.J. and Adriaans, B.M. (2010) Bacterial infections. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 8th edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 25.1-25.26.
  • Hedrick, J. (2003) Acute bacterial skin infections in pediatric medicine: current issues in presentation and treatment. Paediatric Drugs 5(Suppl 1), 35-46. [Abstract]
  • Health Protection Agency (2008) Diagnosis and management of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL)-Staphylococcus aureus infections: quick reference guide for primary care. Public Health England. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Ibler, K.S. and Kromann, C.B. (2014) Recurrent furunculosis - challenges and management: a review. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 7, 59-64. [Abstract]
  • Ladhani, S. and Garbash, M. (2005) Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations. Paediatric Drugs 7(2), 77-102. [Abstract]
  • Layton, A. (2010) Sebaceous and sweat gland disorders. In: Warrell, D.A., Cox, T.M. and Firth, J.D. (Eds.) Oxford textbook of medicine. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4676-4682.
  • MacKie, R.M. and Quinn, A.G. (2004) Non-melanoma skin cancer and other epidermal skin tumours. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 36.1-36.50.
  • Mehraj, J., Witte, W., Akmatov, M.K., et al. (2016) Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage patterns in the community. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology(398), 55-87. [Abstract]
  • MHRA (2020) Erythromycin: caution required due to cardiac risks (QT interval prolongation); drug interaction with rivaroxaban. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Pasternack, M.S. and Swartz, M.M. (2010) Cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, and subcutaneous tissue infections. Staphylococcal scarlet fever. In: Mandell, G.L., Bennett, J.E. and Dolin, R. (Eds.) Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious disease. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Patel, D. and Jahnke, M. (2015) Serious complications from Staphylococcal aureus in atopic dermatitis. Pediatric Dermatology 32(6), 792-796. [Abstract]
  • PCDS (2018) Folliculitis and boils (furuncles / carbuncles). Primary Care Dermatology Society. http://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE and NICE (2021) Summary of antimicrobial prescribing guidance – managing common infections. Public Health England and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C.L. (2021) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
  • Preston, C.L. (2023) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.new.medicinescomplete.com
  • Pugh, M. (Eds.) (2000) Stedman's medical dictionary. 27th edn. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Riain, U.N. (2013) Recommended management of common bacterial skin infections. Prescriber 24(23-24), 15-25.
  • Sakr, A., Brégeon, F., Mège, J.L., et al. (2018) Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Frontiers in Microbiology(9), 2419. [Abstract]
  • Sartelli M, Guirao X, Hardcastle TC, Kluger Y, Boermeester MA, Raşa K, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Montravers P, Abu-Zidan FM, Bartoletti M, Bassetti M, Ben-Ishay O, Biffl WL, Chiara O, Chiarugi M, Coimbra R, De Rosa FG, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Giannella M, Gkiokas G, Khokha V, Labricciosa FM, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Moore EE, Negoi I, Pagani L, Peghin M, Picetti E, Pintar T, Pupelis G, Rubio-Perez I, Sakakushev B, Segovia-Lohse H, Sganga G, Shelat V, Sugrue M, Tarasconi A, Tranà C, Ulrych J, Viale P, Catena F. (2018) WSES/SIS-E consensus conference: recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections. World J Emerg Surg 13(58). [Abstract]
  • Shallcross, L.J., Hayward, A.C., Johnson, A.M. and Petersen, I. (2015a) Incidence and recurrence of boils and abscesses within the first year: a cohort study in UK primary care. British Journal of General Practice 65(639), e668-e676. [Abstract]
  • Shallcross, L.J., Hayward, A.C., Johnson, A.M. and Petersen, I. (2015b) Evidence for increasing severity of community-onset boils and abscesses in UK General Practice. Epidemiology Infection 143(11), 2426-2429. [Abstract]
  • Sladden, M.J. and Johnston, G.A. (2004) Common skin infections in children. BMJ 329(7457), 95-99.
  • Sterling, J.C. (2004) Virus infections. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Stevens, D.L., Bisno, A.L., Chambers, H.F., et al. (2005) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 41(10), 1373-1406.
  • Stevens, D., Bisno, A., Chambers, H., Dellinger, E., et al. (2014a) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59(2), 147-159. [Abstract]
  • Stevens, D.L., Bisno, A.L., Chambers, H.F., et al. (2014b) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 15(59(2)), e10-e52. [Abstract]
  • Stulberg, D.L., Penrod, M.A. and Blatny, R.A. (2002) Common bacterial skin infections. American Family Physician 66(1), 119-124. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Sukumaran V and  Senanayake S (2016) Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections. Australian prescriber 39(5), 159-163. [Abstract]
  • Troxell, T. and Hall, C.A. (2020) Carbuncle. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554459
  • UKTIS (2020) Erythromycin in pregnancy. TOXBASE. UK Teratology Information Service. http://www.toxbase.org
  • Verhoeven, P., Gagnaire, J., Botelho-Nevers, E., et al. (2014) Detection and clinical relevance of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage: an update. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy 12(1), 75-89. [Abstract]
  • Warrell, D.A. (2010) Orf. In: Warrell, D.A., Cox, T.M. and Firth, J.D. (Eds.) Oxford textbook of medicine. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 655-657.
  • Wertheim, H.F., Melles, D.C., Vos, M.C., et al. (2005) The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infectious Diseases 5(12), 751-762. [Abstract]
  • Yates, V.M. and Rook, G.A.W. (2004) Bacterial infections. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 28.1-28.39.
Change privacy settings