Infections and infestations Respiratory
Influenza - seasonal
Last revised in December 2025
Influenza is an acute respiratory illness caused by RNA viruses of the family Orthomyxoviridae (influenza viruses).
Influenza - seasonal: Summary
- Influenza is an acute respiratory illness caused by RNA viruses of the family Orthomyxoviridae (influenza viruses). There are three types of influenza virus:
- Influenza A occurs more frequently and is more virulent. It is responsible for local outbreaks, larger epidemics, and pandemics.
- Influenza B often co-circulates with influenza A during the yearly outbreaks. Generally, influenza B causes less severe clinical illness, although it can still be responsible for outbreaks.
- Influenza C usually causes a mild or asymptomatic infection similar to the common cold.
- Influenza usually occurs in the UK during the winter months; typically between December and March.
- Most complications of influenza in adults are respiratory and include:
- Acute bronchitis.
- Pneumonia.
- Exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Otitis media.
- Sinusitis.
- Influenza presents with symptoms appearing around 2 days after exposure.
- Uncomplicated influenza signs and symptoms include coryza, nasal discharge, cough, fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, ocular symptoms, and sore throat.
- Complicated influenza is defined by signs and symptoms that require hospital admission, involve the lower respiratory tract or central nervous system, or cause significant exacerbation of an underlying medical condition.
- For otherwise healthy people, antiviral drugs (oseltamivir or zanamivir) are not usually recommended, unless they are at risk of developing serious complications. If this is the case, oseltamivir should be prescribed if the national surveillance schemes indicate that influenza virus is circulating, and the person can start treatment within 48 hours.
- For people considered to be in an 'at risk' group antiviral drugs should be prescribed if the national surveillance schemes indicate that influenza virus is circulating, and the person can start treatment within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms (36 hours in the case of zanamivir in children). People considered to be in an 'at risk' group include:
- Those with chronic respiratory, heart, kidney, liver, or neurological disease; diabetes mellitus; or those who are obese or immunosuppressed.
- Those over the age of 65 years.
- Women who are pregnant (or women up to 2 weeks postpartum).
- Children aged under 6 months.
- People with influenza should drink adequate fluids, take paracetamol or ibuprofen to relieve symptoms, rest, and stay off work or school until the worst symptoms have resolved (usually about 1 week).
- Post-exposure prophylaxis with an antiviral drug should be started if all of the following apply:
- The national surveillance scheme indicates that influenza is circulating.
- The person has been in close contact with a person (in the same household or residential setting) who has had recent symptoms of influenza.
- The person is in an 'at risk' group and has not been effectively immunized against influenza.
- The person is able to start treatment within 48 hours of this contact (for oseltamivir) or 36 hours of this contact (for zanamivir).
- Urgent admission to hospital should be considered if:
- A complication such as pneumonia occurs.
- The person has a concomitant disease that may be affected by influenza (for example, type 1 diabetes).
- There is suspicion of a serious illness other than influenza (for example meningitis).
Have I got the right topic?
From birth onwards.
This CKS topic covers the management of seasonal influenza and post-exposure prophylaxis of seasonal influenza. However, prophylaxis of seasonal influenza is not a replacement for immunization; there is a separate CKS topic on Immunizations - seasonal influenza.
This CKS topic does not cover avian or swine influenza, or the management of pandemics. It does not cover influenza immunization, or the management of complications of influenza, such as chest infections, pneumonia, and otitis media.
There are separate CKS topics on Chest infections - adult, Common cold, Coronavirus - COVID-19, Cough - acute with chest signs in children, Otitis media - acute, Sinusitis, and Sore throat - acute.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
December 2025 — minor update. Information on when antivirals can be prescribed has been clarified.
Previous changes
November 2025 — minor update. Updated in line with UKHSA updated guidelines, Influenza: treatment and prophylaxis using anti-viral agents.
April 2024 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.
January 2023 — minor update. Information that the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) notifies GPs directly if the national surveillance scheme indicates that influenza is circulating in the community has been added to this topic.
August 2020 — minor update. Broken URL link updated.
April 2019 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2019 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic.
October 2015 — minor update. Following an update to the Summary of Product Characteristics for Tamiflu® (oseltamivir), the topic has been updated to reflect that oseltamivir is now licensed for:
- The treatment of influenza in adults and children (including full-term neonates) who present with symptoms typical of influenza, when influenza virus is circulating in the community.
- The post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza in:
- Adults and children aged 1 year and over following contact with a clinically diagnosed influenza case when influenza virus is circulating in the community.
- Infants younger than 1 year of age during a pandemic influenza outbreak.
December 2014 — minor update. Topic was checked to ensure that it is in line with the recently published Public Health England (PHE) guideline The treatment and prophylaxis of influenza, the recommendations have not changed but some minor text changes have been made.
October 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. The following revisions have been made in line with recommendations from the Health Protection Agency(HPA) HPA guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza and the UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) Use of oseltamivir in pregnancy:
- Oseltamivir is now recommended to be prescribed to otherwise healthy people if the prescriber feels that the person is at risk of developing serious complications from influenza.
- People considered to be 'at risk' from influenza has been revised to include women up to two weeks post partum and people with morbid obesity (body mass index of 40 or more).
- Oseltamivir is now recommended over zanamivir for the treatment of pregnant women exposed to the influenza virus, except in cases of known or suspected oseltamivir resistance.
The scope of the topic had been reduced to cover only seasonal influenza.
February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
November 2011 — minor update. The doses of oseltamivir in renal impairment have been updated in line with the British National Formulary (BNF). Issued in December 2011.
October 2011 — minor update. The references have been revised to include updated guidance from the Department of Health's Immunisation against infectious disease — the 'Green Book' chapter 19, Influenza.
July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing.
June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
February 2011 — minor update. Recent advice from the Chief Medical Officer regarding prescribing antivirals to people who are not in clinical risk groups has been added.
November 2010 — minor update. Part XVIIIB of the Drug tariff, which defines the circumstances in which oseltamivir and zanamivir may be prescribed, has been updated.
September 2010 — minor update. Text has been added to remind prescribers that antiviral drugs should only be prescribed when national surveillance schemes indicate that influenza is circulating in the community.
July 2010 — minor update. Zanamivir and oseltamivir are no longer 'black triangle' drugs. Prescriptions updated.
February 2010 — minor update. A recent Drug safety update from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) indicates that there remains no evidence to suggest that zanamivir and oseltamivir carry any risks to pregnancy.
March to August 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. The scope of the topic had been reduced to cover only seasonal influenza. Information on avian influenza will be covered in a subsequent CKS topic.
June 2009 — minor update. Additional swine flu link added. Links to information sources regarding 'swine flu' have been added to Have I got the right topic?
November 2008 — minor update. Updated to include a review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 67 previously issued in September 2003, evaluating the use of oseltamivir, amantadine, and zanamivir for the prophylaxis of influenza.
August 2008 — minor update. Updated reference added for the WHO pandemic alert phase 3: algorithm for the management of returning travellers and visitors from countries affected by avian influenza (H5N1) presenting with febrile respiratory illness: recognition, investigation and initial management.
May 2007 — minor update. New safety information from the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) on neuropsychiatric adverse effects with oseltamivir added.
April to June 2006 — reviewed. Validated in September 2006 and issued in October 2006.
November 2005 — updated to include information on how to manage suspected avian influenza and also to incorporate information on two additional groups that the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) now recommends should receive flu immunization.
July 2005 — update to prescriptions for oseltamivir.
April 2005 — minor update. Oseltamivir and zanamivir may only be prescribed on the NHS in certain circumstances and the prescription must be endorsed 'Selected List Scheme' ('SLS').
September 2004 — updated to include the latest update from the CMO on the influenza immunization programme 2004/2005.
October 2003 — updated to incorporate Guidance on the use of oseltamivir and amantadine for the prophylaxis of influenza, technology appraisal guidance no. 67, issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (September 2003); Guidance on the use of zanamivir, oseltamivir and amantadine for the treatment of influenza, technology appraisal guidance no. 58, issued by NICE; and the influenza immunization programme 2003/2004 issued by the CMO.
September 2002 — reviewed. Validated in December 2002 and issued in February 2003.
April 2001 — updated. Issued in October 2001.
July 1999 — written. Validated in October 1999 and issued in January 2000.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 April 2024.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 April 2024.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 April 2024.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Zhao, Y., Gao, Y., Guyatt, G., et al. (2024). Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. medRxiv, 2024-05. [Free Full-text]
- Gao Sr, Y., Guyatt, G., Uyeki, T. M., et al. (2024). Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. medRxiv, 2024-05. [Free Full-text]
Primary evidence
- Laffin, L. J., Kopjar, B., Melgaard, C., et al. (2025). Lorundrostat Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. [Abstract]
- Monto, A. S., Kuhlbusch, K., Bernasconi, C., et al. (2025). Efficacy of Baloxavir Treatment in Preventing Transmission of Influenza. New England Journal of Medicine, 392(16), 1582-1593. [Abstract]
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 April 2024.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 April 2024.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 April 2024.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Identify people at risk from influenza.
- Makes a diagnosis of seasonal influenza.
- Provide self-care advice on relieving symptoms.
- Appropriately prescribe antiviral drugs for people with influenza who are at risk of complications.
- Appropriately prescribe preventive antivirals for people at risk of contracting influenza and experiencing associated complications.
- Admit people to hospital if there is a serious complication of influenza.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.
NICE Quality standards
- Infants and children under 5 years with unexplained fever have their risk of serious illness assessed and recorded using the traffic light system.
- Infants and children under 5 years who are seen in person by a healthcare professional have their temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and capillary refill time measured and recorded if fever is suspected.
- Parents and carers who are advised that they can care for an infant or child under 5 years with unexplained fever at home are given safety net advice, including information on when to seek further help.
Background information
What is it?
- Influenza is an acute respiratory illness caused by RNA viruses of the family Orthomyxoviridae (influenza viruses). There are three types of influenza virus:
- Influenza A occurs more frequently and is more virulent. It is responsible for local outbreaks, larger epidemics, or pandemics.
- Influenza B often co-circulates with influenza A during the yearly outbreaks. Generally, influenza B causes less severe clinical illness, although it can still be responsible for outbreaks. In children, the severity of the illness may be similar to that associated with influenza A.
- Influenza C usually causes a mild or asymptomatic infection similar to the common cold.
- Seasonal influenza virus types A and B are also divided into several subtypes. These subtypes are defined by the H and N antigens present on the virus.
- Influenza-like illness presents as a similar symptom complex to true influenza, but it is caused by a virus other than influenza A, B, or C (for example the respiratory syncytial virus).
- Uncomplicated influenza is an acute respiratory infection caused by influenza A or B viruses that is usually self-limiting in the general population.
- Complicated influenza is more severe and is associated more often with influenza A, rather than influenza B, infection. It is defined by signs and symptoms that require hospital admission, involve the lower respiratory tract or central nervous system, or cause significant exacerbation of an underlying medical condition. Treatment may require more aggressive supportive care or hospitalisation, including treatment with antibiotics and/or antivirals.
How common is it?
- Rates of influenza-like illness (ILI) are reported in the UK between December and May, when influenza is usually circulating. Epidemics typically occur in the winter between December and March.
- In 2022/23 in the UK:
- High levels of influenza activity were observed in a short period between December 2022 and January 2023, with influenza A initially the dominant subtype.
- Influenza type B Victoria lineage became more prominent in early 2023 as influenza A declined.
- Overall, influenza rates then rapidly returned to a low level for the remainder of the season.
- In primary care, ILI consultation rates were above baseline levels between week 51 2022 and week 1 2023 for the first time since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is because the non-pharmaceutical control measures that were used to limit the spread of COVID-19, and also suppress influenza transmission, were no longer widely utilised.
- The peak admission rates of influenza to hospital were higher compared to previous seasons. This is thought to be due to improved virological case ascertainment
What are the complications?
- Most complications of influenza in adults are respiratory and include:
- Acute bronchitis.
- Exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Otitis media.
- Pneumonia — this can be caused by a secondary bacterial infection (particularly with Staphylococcus aureus) or primary viral infection.
- Sinusitis.
- Non-respiratory complications include:
- Cardiac complications — myocarditis, pericarditis, and exacerbation of underlying cardiac disease.
- Febrile convulsions.
- Myalgia, myositis and rhabdomyolysis.
- Neurological complications — Reyes syndrome, encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, aseptic meningitis, and encephalitis.
- Toxic shock syndrome.
- Pregnant women are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza infection, particularly in the third trimester. Influenza infection in pregnancy has been associated with perinatal mortality, preterm labour, and low infant birth weight.
[NICE, 2014; PHE, 2015; Paules, 2017; IDSA, 2019; UKHSA, 2023a; UKTIS, 2023a; BMJ Best Practice, 2024]
Diagnosis of seasonal influenza
How should I diagnose seasonal influenza?
- The diagnosis of influenza is generally made using clinical features alone when it is known to be circulating in the community (for weekly influenza surveillance reports, visit www.gov.uk).
- Diagnosis of influenza can only be confirmed by laboratory testing, although the probability that an influenza-like illness is caused by influenza is higher if influenza is known to be circulating and if a person has a high fever.
- When influenza and COVID-19 are co-circulating, validated diagnostic tests for for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B can be used to strengthen diagnosis. COVID-19 point-of-care testing with a lateral flow device may be used to inform the diagnosis, but is not a substitute for COVID-19 PCR testing in people with relevant symptoms. For further information, please see the CKS topic on Coronavirus - COVID-19.
- Rapid testing for influenza should be undertaken in all people with complicated influenza (although often this takes place in hospital).
- Initiation of antiviral treatment should not be delayed while awaiting laboratory confirmation.
- Laboratory testing to confirm or exclude influenza is particularly important if an individual develops symptoms despite antiviral prophylaxis, or has a persistent infection despite antiviral treatment, to identify the potential development of antiviral resistance.
- Diagnosis of influenza can only be confirmed by laboratory testing, although the probability that an influenza-like illness is caused by influenza is higher if influenza is known to be circulating and if a person has a high fever.
- Symptoms of influenza appear abruptly, around 2 days after exposure.
- Signs and symptoms of non-severe influenza include:
- Coryza, and nasal discharge.
- Cough.
- Fever
- Gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Generalised symptoms (headache, malaise, myalgia, and arthralgia).
- Ocular symptoms (such as photophobia, conjunctivitis, and lacrimation and pain upon eye movement).
- Sore throat.
- No clinical features of complicated influenza.
- Severe influenza is suggested by
- Signs and symptoms that require hospital admission.
- Presence of a lower respiratory tract infection (hypoxaemia, dyspnoea, and lung infiltrate).
- Central nervous system involvement.
- Significant exacerbation of an underlying medical condition.
- Signs and symptoms of non-severe influenza include:
- Symptoms of influenza-like illness can be different in infants and children and may include:
- Cervical adenopathy.
- Conjunctival erythema.
- Diarrhoea and vomiting — gastrointestinal symptoms are more common in children than in adults.
- Fatigue.
- Fever (typically 38–40°C) — children can have a higher maximum temperature. They may also present with undifferentiated fever or febrile seizures. For further information, please see the CKS topic on Feverish children - risk assessment and management.
- Hyperaemia of oropharynx.
- Irritability.
- Laryngotracheobronchitis (croup), bronchiolitis, or bronchitis.
- Myalgia or myositis — this can affect the calf muscles and be severe. It is a more common complication in children compared to adults.
- Tachypnoea.
Basis for recommendation
The information on the clinical features of influenza infection is based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guideline Influenza infection [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guideline 2018 Update on Diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management of seasonal influenza [IDSA, 2019], and expert opinion in a narrative review Influenza [Paules, 2017].
What else might cause symptoms of influenza-like illness?
- Other conditions that can present with features of influenza-like illness include:
- Sepsis — may be an alternative diagnosis or a complication of an acute respiratory infection. For further information, see the CKS topic on Sepsis.
- The common cold (coryza) — causes more nasal problems; fever, fatigue, and myalgia are less common and/or less severe. For more information, see the CKS topic on Common cold.
- COVID-19 infection — signs and symptoms are similar to influenza infection. More likely when known to be circulating locally. A person can be co-infected with influenza and COVID-19 and is associated with an increased risk of mortality. For more information, see the CKS topic on Coronavirus - COVID-19.
- Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection — upper and lower respiratory symptoms peak in 3–5 days and resolve within 7–10 days. The most common cause of lower respiratory tract infections in children aged under 1 year. Also, a significant and often unrecognised cause of lower respiratory tract infection in older people and people who are immunosuppressed.
- Parainfluenza virus infection (PIV) — generally causes mild upper respiratory tract infections, but can induce life-threatening lower respiratory tract infections in people who are immunocompromised. It is the second most common cause, after RSV, of acute lower respiratory tract infections in infants and young children.
- Streptococcal pharyngitis — is characterized by an acutely sore throat; usually, pain is more severe if infection with Streptococcus pyogenes is responsible. Cough, sneeze, and nasal congestion are absent. For more information, see the CKS topic on Sore throat - acute.
- Meningitis — should be ruled out. Signs and symptoms that make a diagnosis of meningitis more likely include:
- In infants and babies — a high fever; loss of consciousness; blank, staring expression; vomiting and loss of appetite; high-pitched screaming or whimpering; floppiness with a dislike of being held; and/or a tense or bulging fontanelle.
- In older children and adults — fever, vomiting, stiff neck, photophobia, severe headache, muscular pains, fits, stomach pain/cramps (caused by sepsis), and/or confusion.
- A late sign of meningococcal sepsis is a purpuric rash.
- For more information, see the CKS topic on Meningitis - bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease.
- Bacterial pneumonia or acute bronchitis — may be mistaken for influenza or may develop following a viral upper respiratory tract infection (including influenza). Factors that increase the risk of lower respiratory tract infections include advanced age, being immunocompromised, having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or being a current smoker. For more information, see the CKS topics on Chest infections - adult and Cough - acute with chest signs in children.
- Infectious mononucleosis (glandular fever) — is prevalent in young adults and adolescents. It is a chronic infection characterized by prolonged fever, severe sore throat, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes. For more information, see the CKS topic on Glandular fever (infectious mononucleosis).
- Pertussis (whooping cough) — may cause prodromal symptoms similar to those of influenza, but it should be easily diagnosed once the characteristic cough develops. For more information, see the CKS topic on Whooping cough.
- Malaria — should be suspected in people presenting with fever who have recently travelled to an area where malaria is endemic. For more information, see the CKS topics on Malaria and Malaria prophylaxis.
Basis for recommendation
This information is largely based on expert opinion in a medical textbook Influenza in practice [Jennings, 2005], the UK Health Security Agency Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025] and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guideline Influenza infection [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
Sepsis
- The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) highlights that sepsis should be considered as a diagnosis at first contact with NHS services for all people with acute respiratory infection [NICE, 2023].
Management
Scenario: Treatment of influenza
From birth onwards.
When should I prescribe an antiviral drug for someone with influenza?
- Note: people with complicated influenza will typically require admission to hospital. For further information, see the section on follow up and admission.
- For people with uncomplicated influenza who are being treated in primary care:
- If COVID-19 is a possible differential diagnosis, arrange a PCR test to rule this out when considering prescribing an antiviral to treat influenza.
- COVID-19 point-of-care testing with a lateral flow device may also be used to inform antiviral use, but is not a substitute for PCR testing.
- If point-of-care testing is unavailable, an influenza antiviral should be started promptly without awaiting PCR results if influenza is considered to be highly probable (such following close contact with a confirmed case).
- If available, testing for influenza should be undertaken alongside COVID-19 testing but is not required for influenza antiviral initiation.
- Prescribe an antiviral drug (oral oseltamivir or inhaled zanamivir) for people with influenza if all of the following apply:
- The national surveillance scheme indicates that influenza is circulating.
- The person is in an 'at risk' group of people who likely have a poorer prognosis from influenza than otherwise healthy people.
- The person can start treatment within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms (36 hours in the case of zanamivir in children).
- Starting treatment after 48 hours of the onset of symptoms (or 36 hours in the case of zanamivir in children) is an off-label use and clinical judgement should be exercised.
- Consider prescribing oral oseltamivir for previously healthy people with influenza if all of the following apply:
- The person is not in an 'at risk' group, but is at serious risk of developing complications.
- The national surveillance scheme indicates that influenza is circulating.
- The person is able to start treatment within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms.
- If COVID-19 is a possible differential diagnosis, arrange a PCR test to rule this out when considering prescribing an antiviral to treat influenza.
- Seek advice about the use of antivirals from a local medicine specialist if required.
'At risk' groups
- 'At risk groups' include people aged over 65 years, children aged under 6 months, pregnant women (at any stage of pregnancy and up to two weeks postpartum), and people with any of the following conditions:
- Asplenia or dysfunction of the spleen — including conditions such as homozygous sickle cell disease and coeliac syndrome that may lead to splenic dysfunction.
- Chronic respiratory disease, including:
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis and emphysema, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung fibrosis, pneumoconiosis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
- Asthma that requires continuous or repeated use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids or with previous exacerbations requiring hospital admission.
- Children who have previously been admitted to hospital for lower respiratory tract disease.
- Chronic heart disease — including congenital heart disease, hypertension with cardiac complications, chronic heart failure, and individuals requiring regular medication or follow up for ischaemic heart disease.
- Chronic kidney disease — including chronic kidney disease stage 3, 4, or 5, chronic kidney failure, nephrotic syndrome, and kidney transplantation.
- Chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis, biliary atresia, and chronic hepatitis.
- Chronic neurological conditions, including stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Conditions where respiratory function may be compromised (for example polio syndrome). Individual assessment should also be considered in clinically vulnerable individuals including those with cerebral palsy, learning disabilities, multiple sclerosis and related or similar conditions; hereditary and degenerative disease of the nervous system or muscles; or severe neurological disability.
- Diabetes mellitus, including type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes (requiring oral hypoglycaemic drugs or a controlled diet).
- Immunosuppression due to disease or treatment, including:
- Current chemotherapy (or radiotherapy), or within 6 months of treatment cessation.
- Bone marrow transplant with current use of immunosuppressants, or within 12 months of treatment cessation.
- Current graft-versus-host disease.
- HIV infection with severe immunosuppression.
- Treatment with systemic steroids for more than 1 month at dosages equivalent to prednisolone 20 mg or more daily (at any age) or, for children weighing less than 20 kg, a dose of 1 mg or more per kg body weight per day.
- Current treatment or within 6 months of cessation of other types of highly immunosuppressive therapy, or where a person's specialist regards them as severely immunosuppressed.
- Multiple myeloma.
- Genetic disorders affecting the immune system (for example, IRAK-4, NEMO, complement disorder).
- Morbid obesity (body mass index of 40 or more).
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publications Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the chapter on Influenza in the 'Green Book' [UKHSA, 2023a], the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014], and the manufacturers' Summaries of Product Characteristics for oseltamivir [EMC, 2021] and zanamivir [EMC, 2023].
Efficacy of antivirals in treating influenza virus
- A 2014 Cochrane systematic review [Jefferson, 2014] which assessed the the potential benefits and harms of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for preventing and treating influenza in all age group found that:
- Oseltamivir and zanamivir have small, non-specific effects on reducing the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms in adults, but not in asthmatic children — oseltamivir reduced the time to first alleviation of symptoms by 16.8 hours (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4 to 25.1 hours, P < 0.0001); zanamivir reduced the time to first alleviation of symptoms in adults by 0.60 days (95% CI 0.39 to 0.81 days, P < 0.00001).
- Treatment of adults with oseltamivir had no significant effect on hospitalisations — risk difference (RD) 0.15% (95% CI -0.78 to 0.91).
- Using either drug as prophylaxis reduces the risk of developing symptomatic influenza. In prophylaxis trials, oseltamivir and zanamivir reduced the risk of symptomatic influenza in:
- Individuals — oseltamivir: RD 3.05% (95% CI 1.83 to 3.88); number needed to benefit (NNTB) = 33 (26 to 55). Zanamivir: RD 1.98% (95% CI 0.98 to 2.54); NNTB = 51 (40 to 103).
- Households — oseltamivir: RD 13.6% (95% CI 9.52 to 15.47); NNTB = 7 (6 to 11). Zanamivir: RD 14.84% (95% CI 12.18 to 16.55); NNTB = 7 (7 to 9).
- Oseltamivir increases the risk of adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, psychiatric effects and renal events in adults and vomiting in children — oseltamivir in the treatment of adults increased the risk of nausea (RD 3.66%, 95% CI 0.90 to 7.39); number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) = 28 (95% CI 14 to 112) and vomiting (RD 4.56%, 95% CI 2.39 to 7.58); NNTH = 22 (14 to 42).
- However, in a 2014 response to the Cochrane review, Public Health England (PHE) commented that it had been suggested that 'antivirals are not effective for influenza', but that they had the following concerns regarding the evidence presented [PHE, 2014]:
- The variation in outcomes, patient groups, and settings studied limits the conclusions of the review.
- The review included evidence only from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which were carried out in an otherwise healthy population in the community setting (and therefore interpreted the modest effects that NAIs on the duration of acute symptoms in uncomplicated infection). It had limitations in understanding hospitalisations, complications, and the prevention of complications occurring in cases of severe infection, and mortality.
- There was no evidence from RCTs for non-seasonal influenza viruses with high case fatality rates, or a novel influenza virus with pandemic potential, or RCTs in severely ill people (due to ethical considerations).
- In the absence of appropriate RCT data on severe influenza, observational studies have important contributions to make to policy development.
- A substantial volume of observational data was not considered in the review, including evidence of the ability of NAIs to stop the progression of severe cases of H5N1 or pandemic H1N1 infection.
- PHE concluded that it is essential that physicians treating severely unwell people in any setting are not deterred from prescribing NAIs as a result of confusion over efficacy, and that this is especially true for people hospitalised with proven or suspected influenza.
- UKHSA continues to cite the PHE response to the Cochrane review [PHE, 2014] as the basis of its support for early use of antivirals for people with proven or suspected seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025].
- A 2016 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment [NIHR, 2016] reached similar conclusions to the Cochrane review:
- Oseltamivir and zanamivir cause small reductions in the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms in adults, but not in asthmatic children.
- The use of oseltamivir increases the risk of nausea, vomiting and psychiatric events in adults and vomiting in children and may reduce risk of diarrhoea and cardiac events in adults.
- Observational studies fail to show that oseltamivir has a protective effect on mortality among people with 2009A/H1N1 influenza.
- Prophylaxis with either oseltamivir or zanamivir may reduce symptomatic influenza in individuals and in households but there was no reduction in all other influenza outcomes, including overall influenza-like illness reported as an adverse event on-treatment.
- However, the results did not discount a potential benefit of using zanamivir and oseltamivir in individuals under particular situations, for example in immunocompromised or in compassionate cases, for which few other therapeutic options may exist.
Which antiviral drug should I prescribe if treatment is indicated?
- For uncomplicated influenza in people:
- Who were previously healthy — no antiviral treatment is normally indicated, unless the person is at serious risk of developing serious complications from influenza, then prescribe oral oseltamivir.
- Who are in an at risk group (including women who are pregnant), but are not severely immunosuppressed — prescribe oral oseltamivir. Do not wait for laboratory confirmation.
- Who are severely immunosuppressed, and the dominant strain has:
- A lower risk of oseltamivir resistance (for example, A [H3N2] influenza B) — prescribe oral oseltamivir.
- A higher risk of oseltamivir resistance (for example, A [H1N1]) — prescribe inhaled zanamivir, or if this is unsuitable or inappropriate, prescribe oral oseltamivir and follow up.
- See the prescribing information sections on Oseltamivir and Zanamivir for recommended doses, contraindications, cautions, and possible adverse effects of these drugs.
- Seek advice about the use of antivirals from a local medicine specialist if required.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014].
Choice of oseltamivir or zanamivir
- Some influenza subtypes are associated with a greater risk of developing oseltamivir resistance. This risk is greatest in people who are severely immunosuppressed. The selection of first line antivirals in these people should take account the subtype of influenza causing infection, or if that is unknown, the dominant strain of influenza that is circulating during the current influenza season.
- Influenza A (H1N1) is considered to be a higher risk for the development of oseltamivir resistance, while influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B are considered lower risk.
- The dominant circulating strain of influenza is obtainable from the PHE weekly influenza reports.
What advice should I give someone to help manage influenza?
- Advise the person:
- To drink adequate fluids to avoid dehydration.
- To take paracetamol or ibuprofen for symptomatic relief.
- To rest in bed if they feel fatigued.
- To stay off work or school if they feel unable to attend — for most people, about 1 week will be adequate.
- That fever and associated systemic symptoms of uncomplicated influenza usually resolve after about 1 week, although some symptoms (such as cough and fatigue) may persist for up to 2 weeks after resolution of fever.
- About the symptoms of complicated influenza and to seek medical advice should their condition deteriorate.
- Advise the person that routine follow up is not necessary, but they should:
- Seek urgent medical attention if they develop shortness of breath or pleuritic chest pain, or if they start to cough up blood (haemoptysis) — this may indicate the development of pneumonia secondary to bacterial superinfection.
- Arrange a follow-up appointment if there is no improvement after 1 week (that is, they are still significantly ill), or they are deteriorating.
- Have a lower threshold for seeking help if the person with influenza is a baby or young child.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guideline Influenza infection [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], expert opinion in a narrative review Influenza [Paules, 2017], and what CKS considers good medical practice.
Self-care advice
- It is universally recommended that adequate fluid intake should be maintained when symptoms of influenza are present, to replace fluid lost by fever, sweating, and nasal discharge. However, a Cochrane systematic review found no controlled trials assessing the effect of increasing fluid intake in people with acute respiratory infections [Guppy, 2011].
- Paracetamol and ibuprofen are recommended for the symptomatic relief of influenza on the basis that they reduce fever and pain (including headache and myalgia).
- The antipyretic and analgesic efficacy of paracetamol and ibuprofen have been confirmed by RCTs in several conditions, including influenza and the common cold [Eccles, 2006].
- Many people with influenza feel ill and fatigued to the extent that they voluntarily take to their beds [Jennings, 2005], and this should be encouraged.
- There are no formal guidelines as to how long a person should stay off work or school, but prognostic data from the placebo arms of controlled trials indicate that most people should feel sufficiently well to return to normal activities after 1 week at most [Burch, 2008].
Advice about when to seek medical attention
- CKS identified no reviews or guidelines on when it is appropriate to follow up a person with influenza. These recommendations are what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- Shortness of breath, pain on breathing, and haemoptysis may indicate the development of pneumonia secondary to bacterial superinfection. Secondary bacterial pneumonia is an important complication of influenza and contributes to approximately 25% of all influenza-associated deaths [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- The most common bacteria are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Haemophilus influenzae.
- The natural history of influenza indicates that symptoms should be improving after 1 week [Paules, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2024]. If symptoms are not improving or are worsening, reassessment of the diagnosis should be considered.
- Children are at high risk of developing complications [BMJ Best Practice, 2024] and there is an increased risk of hospital admission in children younger than 5 years (particularly children aged less than 2 years) [Paules, 2017].
- Shortness of breath, pain on breathing, and haemoptysis may indicate the development of pneumonia secondary to bacterial superinfection. Secondary bacterial pneumonia is an important complication of influenza and contributes to approximately 25% of all influenza-associated deaths [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
When should I follow up or admit a person with influenza?
- Consider follow up particularly in people at high risk of serious complications (for example, people aged over 65 years) within 1 week, to confirm that symptoms are improving and to rule out secondary complications.
- Consider admission to hospital, depending on clinical judgement, if:
- A complication of influenza occurs.
- Pneumonia is a common complication that may be indicated by lower respiratory tract distress (characterized by laboured breathing, shortness of breath, pleuritic chest pain, and haemoptysis). It may occur immediately, or up to 2 weeks, after initial symptoms of influenza. For more information, see the CKS topics on Chest infections - adult and Cough - acute with chest signs in children.
- The person has a co-existing medical condition that puts them at high risk of complications — for example, people with diabetes mellitus (particularly type 1) are at risk of hyperglycaemia, ketoacidosis, and diabetic coma.
- An alternative diagnosis is suspected.
- A complication of influenza occurs.
- Also consider admission to hospital in children:
- Aged under 2 years if they are in an 'at risk' group.
- If they have febrile symptoms that may indicate serious illness. For more information see the CKS topic on Feverish children - risk assessment and management.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guideline Influenza infection [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], expert opinion in a narrative review Influenza [Paules, 2017], and what CKS considers good medical practice.
Follow up
- CKS identified no reviews or guidelines on when it is appropriate to follow up a person with influenza. Therefore, these recommendations reflect what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- The recommendation to consider follow-up in people who are at high risk of complications is pragmatic. The natural history of influenza indicates that symptoms should be improving after 1 week [Paules, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2024]. If symptoms are not improving or are worsening, reassessment of the diagnosis should be considered.
Admission
- CKS identified no reviews or guidelines on when it is appropriate to admit a person with influenza. Therefore, these recommendations reflect what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- Development of complications — the recommendation to consider admitting people with complications of influenza (depending on clinical judgment) is pragmatic as these people may require specialist assessment and management.
- UKHSA states that all people with complicated influenza should receive treatment and that this will often be in hospital [UKHSA, 2025].
- Pneumonia is the most common serious complication of influenza. It may be caused by the influenza virus itself, or by bacterial superinfection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Haemophilus influenzae. Pneumonia should be regarded as a serious condition which will usually require specialist assessment and management. Bacterial pneumonia is the main cause of mortality in people who are hospitalized with influenza [Jennings, 2005].
- The presence of medical comorbidities (for example, neuromuscular disease, cognitive dysfunction, pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, liver disease, diabetes mellitus, heavy alcohol use, and obesity) is associated with an increased risk of mortality from influenza [Paules, 2017] — people with diabetes mellitus are known to be at increased risk of bacterial pneumonia and acute complications of diabetes (such as ketoacidosis) after infection with influenza [Joshi, 1999]. The incidence of ketoacidosis in people with diabetes has been observed to increase by 50% in influenza epidemic years [Bouter, 1991].
- Alternative diagnosis — other serious illnesses may have signs and symptoms that mimic influenza. People with these symptoms should be seen by a specialist if there is diagnostic doubt.
- Children are at high risk of developing complications [BMJ Best Practice, 2024] and there is an increased risk of hospital admission in children younger than 5 years (particularly children aged less than 2 years) [Paules, 2017].
- Development of complications — the recommendation to consider admitting people with complications of influenza (depending on clinical judgment) is pragmatic as these people may require specialist assessment and management.
Scenario: Post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza
From birth onwards.
When should I prescribe antiviral drugs for post-exposure prophylaxis?
- Prescribe an antiviral drug for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) if all the following circumstances apply:
- The person has had contact with a person strongly suspected (on the basis of community prevalence and clinical features) or known to have influenza.
- The person is in an ‘at risk’ group and has not been adequately protected by vaccination because:
- They have not been vaccinated within the same influenza season.
- There has been less than 14 days between vaccination and date of contact with influenza.
- There is low confidence the vaccine gives good protection against the influenza strain they are known or suspected to have been infected with based on testing of the case or national surveillance of circulating strains (for example, where national surveillance indicates that a drifted strain is circulating).
- Note: if the person has been exposed due to a localised outbreak (for example, in a care home) PEP can be considered regardless of vaccination status.
- The person can start PEP within 48 hours of this contact for oseltamivir or 36 hours for zanamivir.
- PEP after 48 hours for oseltamivir or 36 hours for zanamivir is off-label use but can be done in consultation with a local infection specialist, such as a virologist, or a consultant in health protection. Note that in institutional outbreaks, ongoing exposures may occur due to new-onset cases and may support initiation beyond 48 or 36 hours from exposure to the index or primary cases.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014].
How should I manage a person requiring post-exposure prophylaxis?
- If post-exposure prophylaxis is indicated, prescribe oral oseltamivir or inhaled zanamivir (as appropriate).
- For people at risk of complicated influenza (including pregnant women, but excluding severely immunosuppressed people and children aged under 5 years), prescribe:
- Oral oseltamivir once daily for 10 days if the identified strain in the index case or dominant circulating strain is lower risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example, influenza A [H3N2], influenza B), or is known to be higher risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example, influenza A [H1N1]).
- Inhaled zanamivir daily for 10 days if the person has been exposed to suspected or confirmed oseltamivir-resistant influenza.
- For severely immunosuppressed adults and children aged 5 years and over, prescribe:
- Oral oseltamivir once daily for 10 days if the identified strain in the index case or dominant circulating strain is lower risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example influenza A [H3N2] and influenza B).
- Inhaled zanamivir daily for 10 days if the identified strain in the index case or dominant circulating strain is higher risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example, influenza A [H1N1]), or if this is unsuitable or inappropriate, prescribe oral oseltamivir once daily for 10 days.
- Inhaled zanamivir daily for 10 days if the person has been exposed to suspected or confirmed oseltamivir-resistant influenza. If this is unsuitable or inappropriate seek specialist advice.
- For children aged under 5 years in at risk groups, including severely immunocompromised children:
- Prescribe oral oseltamivir once daily for 10 days if the identified strain in the index case or dominant circulating strain is lower risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example, influenza A [H3N2], influenza B), or is known to be higher risk for oseltamivir resistance (for example, influenza A [H1N1]).
- If the child has been exposed to suspected or confirmed oseltamivir-resistant influenza, seek specialist advice.
- Note: when administering post-exposure prophylaxis to people who are immunosuppressed who are contacts of a confirmed case, ensure diagnostic sampling for influenza detection prior to use of the antiviral.
- If testing shows that the person is infected with influenza, commence a full course of treatment dose antivirals.
- See the Prescribing information sections on oseltamivir and zanamivir for recommended doses, contraindications, cautions, and possible adverse effects of these drugs.
- For people at risk of complicated influenza (including pregnant women, but excluding severely immunosuppressed people and children aged under 5 years), prescribe:
- Arrange for the person to receive influenza immunization if this has not already been done in the present influenza season.
- Note: the efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced if it is administered within 2 weeks of use of an influenza antiviral agent.
- Inform the person that although antiviral drugs help prevent influenza, they are not completely effective. Provide advice about symptomatic treatment and when to seek medical attention if influenza develops.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014], and what CKS considers good clinical practice.
Efficacy of antivirals in post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza virus
- A 2014 Cochrane systematic review [Jefferson, 2014] which assessed the the potential benefits and harms of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) for preventing and treating influenza in all age groups found that:
- Oseltamivir and zanamivir have small, non-specific effects on reducing the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms in adults, but not in asthmatic children — oseltamivir reduced the time to first alleviation of symptoms by 16.8 hours (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4 to 25.1 hours, P < 0.0001); zanamivir reduced the time to first alleviation of symptoms in adults by 0.60 days (95% CI 0.39 to 0.81 days, P < 0.00001).
- Treatment of adults with oseltamivir had no significant effect on hospitalisations — risk difference (RD) 0.15% (95% CI -0.78 to 0.91).
- Using either drug as prophylaxis reduces the risk of developing symptomatic influenza. In prophylaxis trials, oseltamivir and zanamivir reduced the risk of symptomatic influenza in:
- Individuals — oseltamivir: RD 3.05% (95% CI 1.83 to 3.88); number needed to benefit (NNTB) = 33 (26 to 55). Zanamivir: RD 1.98% (95% CI 0.98 to 2.54); NNTB = 51 (40 to 103).
- Households — oseltamivir: RD 13.6% (95% CI 9.52 to 15.47); NNTB = 7 (6 to 11). Zanamivir: RD 14.84% (95% CI 12.18 to 16.55); NNTB = 7 (7 to 9).
- Oseltamivir increases the risk of adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, psychiatric effects and renal events in adults and vomiting in children — oseltamivir in the treatment of adults increased the risk of nausea (RD 3.66%, 95% CI 0.90 to 7.39); number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) = 28 (95% CI 14 to 112) and vomiting (RD 4.56%, 95% CI 2.39 to 7.58); NNTH = 22 (14 to 42).
- However, in a 2014 response to the Cochrane review, Public Health England (PHE) commented that it had been suggested that 'antivirals are not effective for influenza', but that they had the following concerns regarding the evidence presented [PHE, 2014]:
- The variation in outcomes, patient groups, and settings studied limits the conclusions of the review.
- The review included evidence only from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which were carried out in an otherwise healthy population in the community setting (and therefore interpreted the modest effects that NAIs on the duration of acute symptoms in uncomplicated infection). It had limitations in understanding hospitalisations, complications, and the prevention of complications occurring in cases of severe infection, and mortality.
- There was no evidence from RCTs for non-seasonal influenza viruses with high case fatality rates, or a novel influenza virus with pandemic potential, or RCTs in severely ill people (due to ethical considerations).
- In the absence of appropriate RCT data on severe influenza, observational studies have important contributions to make to policy development.
- A substantial volume of observational data was not considered in the review, including evidence of the ability of NAIs to stop the progression of severe cases of H5N1 or pandemic H1N1 infection.
- PHE concluded that it is essential that physicians treating severely unwell people in any setting are not deterred from prescribing NAIs as a result of confusion over efficacy, and that this is especially true for people hospitalised with proven or suspected influenza.
- UKHSA continues to cite the PHE response to the Cochrane review [PHE, 2014] as the basis of its support for early use of antivirals for people with proven or suspected seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025].
- A 2016 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment [NIHR, 2016] reached similar conclusions to the Cochrane review:
- Oseltamivir and zanamivir cause small reductions in the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms in adults, but not in asthmatic children.
- The use of oseltamivir increases the risk of nausea, vomiting and psychiatric events in adults and vomiting in children and may reduce risk of diarrhoea and cardiac events in adults.
- Observational studies fail to show that oseltamivir has a protective effect on mortality among people with 2009A/H1N1 influenza.
- Prophylaxis with either oseltamivir or zanamivir may reduce symptomatic influenza in individuals and in households but there was no reduction in all other influenza outcomes, including overall influenza-like illness reported as an adverse event on-treatment.
- However, the results did not discount a potential benefit of using zanamivir and oseltamivir in individuals under particular situations, for example in immunocompromised or in compassionate cases, for which few other therapeutic options may exist.
Diagnostic sampling
- UKHSA recommends diagnostic sampling before or at the time of commencing antiviral prophylaxis for immunosuppressed people with contact to a confirmed case [UKHSA, 2021]. This is based on expert advice as:
- Symptoms and signs of influenza may be minimal despite infection in immunosuppressed people.
- Antivirals administered at prophylactic doses can promote antiviral resistance if an immunosuppressed person is already infected with influenza.
Influenza immunization
- All people who are eligible for antiviral prophylaxis are also suitable for influenza immunization (unless there are contraindications).
- For more information on influenza immunization, see the CKS topic on Immunizations - seasonal influenza.
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Oseltamivir
Dose
Table 1. Recommended doses of oseltamivir.
| Treatment of influenza | Post exposure prophylaxis | |
|---|---|---|
| Adults (aged 13 years and over) 41 kg and above | 75 mg twice a day for 5 days | 75 mg once a day for 10 days |
| Adults (aged 13 years and over) up to 41 kg | 60 mg twice a day for 5 days | 60 mg once a day for 5 days |
| Adults (aged 13 years and over) who are immunosuppressed | 75 mg twice a day for 10 days | 75 mg once a day for 10 days |
| Children aged 1–12 years (dose is based on body weight) | ||
| ≤ 15 kg | 30 mg twice a day | 30 mg once a day |
| >15–23 kg | 45 mg twice a day | 45 mg once a day |
| > 23–40 kg | 60 mg twice a day | 60 mg once a day |
| >40 kg | 75 mg twice a day | 75 mg once a day |
| Children aged under 1 year | ||
| 0–12 months | 3 mg/kg twice a day | 3 mg/kg once a day |
| Premature | ||
| < 36 weeks post conceptual age | 1 mg/kg twice a day* | ** |
| Renal impairment for adults and children aged 13–17 years (dose is based on creatinine clearance) | ||
| > 60 mL/min | 75 mg twice a day | 75 mg once a day |
| 30–60 mL/min | 30 mg twice a day | 30 mg once a day |
| 11– 30 mL/min | 30 mg once a day | 30 mg once every second day |
| ≤ 10 mL/min | 30 mg ONCE | 30 mg ONCE, repeated after 7 days |
| Data from: | ||
| * This is an unlicensed use of oseltamivir with dosage based on evidence from the literature and expert opinion; ** there is currently no publicly available dosing information for oseltamivir prophylaxis in pre-term infants and so it is outside the product license. | ||
Contraindications and cautions
- Prescribe oseltamivir with caution to people with renal impairment — dose adjustments may be necessary.
Adverse effects
- Common adverse effects include:
- Abdominal pain.
- Conjunctivitis.
- Dizziness and vertigo.
- Earache.
- Headache.
- Nausea and vomiting.
- Otitis media.
- Uncommon adverse effects include:
- Arrhythmia.
- Consciousness impaired.
- Skin reactions.
- Rare adverse effects include:
- Abnormal behaviour abnormal.
- Angioedema.
- Anxiety, confusion, delirium, delusions, hallucination, and self-injurious behaviour.
- Haemorrhage.
- Hepatic disorders.
Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Pregnancy
- There is no evidence of harm following use of oseltamivir during pregnancy.
- Oseltamivir can be used in women who are pregnant when the potential benefit outweighs the risk.
- Oseltamivir remains the first line option for the vast majority of pregnant women with influenza, including during seasons that are dominated by influenza A(H1N1).
- Breastfeeding
- Oseltamivir and its active metabolite are excreted in breast milk.
- Safety data are limited, however, oseltamivir can be used in women who are breastfeeding when the potential benefit outweighs the risk (for example, during a pandemic).
- Oseltamivir is the preferred drug in women who are breastfeeding.
Drug interactions
- Leflunomide/teriflunomide — levels of the active metabolite of oseltamivir may be increased. Monitor for adverse effects and adjust oseltamivir dose if required.
- Tolvaptan — levels of the active metabolite of oseltamivir may be increased. Monitor for adverse effects and adjust oseltamivir dose if required.
- Warfarin — isolated case of raised INRs has been reported.
Zanamivir
Dose
- The dose of inhaled zanamivir for adults and children aged over 5 years for:
- Treatment of influenza is 10 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- Post exposure prophylaxis of influenza is 10 mg once daily for 10 days.
- Zanamivir is not licensed for use in children aged under 5 years.
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe zanamivir to people with milk protein allergy.
- Prescribe zanamivir with caution to people with:
- Asthma or chronic pulmonary disease — risk of bronchospasm. If close monitoring is not possible, avoid use.
- Uncontrolled chronic illness.
Adverse effects
- Common adverse effects include:
- Skin reactions.
- Uncommon adverse effects include:
- Bronchospasm, dyspnoea, and throat tightness.
- Dehydration.
- Oropharyngeal oedema.
- Presyncope.
- Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).
- Urticaria.
- Other adverse effects include:
- Abnormal behaviour, and psychiatric disorder.
- Delirium, hallucination, and level of consciousness decreased.
- Seizure.
Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Pregnancy
- Safety data are limited, but do not suggest harm following use of zanamivir in pregnancy. Exposure via the inhaled route is likely to result in only low levels of fetal exposure.
- Zanamivir can be used in women who are pregnant when the potential benefit outweighs the risk (for example, during a pandemic).
- Oseltamivir is the first line option for the vast majority of pregnant women with influenza, including during seasons that are dominated by influenza A(H1N1).
- Breastfeeding
- Safety data is limited, however, the amount of zanamivir excreted in breast milk is probably too small to be harmful.
- Zanamivir can be used in women who are breastfeeding when the potential benefit outweighs the risk (for example, during a pandemic).
- However, the manufacturer advises that as a risk to the breastfed child cannot be excluded a decision must be made whether to discontinue breastfeeding or to discontinue/abstain from treatment, taking into account the benefit of breastfeeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman.
Drug interactions
- There are no significant drug interactions for zanamivir.
The doses of baloxavir marboxil for the treatment of and post-exposure prophylaxis for influenza in adults are as follows:
- Body weight less than 20 kg — a single dose of 2 mg /kg.
- Body weight between 20 kg – 79 kg — a single dose of 40 mg.
- Body weight 80 kg and over — a single dose of 80 mg.
The doses of baloxavir marboxil for the treatment of and post-exposure prophylaxis for influenza in children are as follows:
- Aged 12 to 17 years with body weight up to 79 kg — a single dose of 40 mg.
- Aged 12 to 17 years with body weight over 80 kg — a single dose of 80 mg.
- Baloxavir marboxil is contraindicated in people with hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients.
Adverse effects of baloxavir marboxil include:
- Immunological
- Anaphylaxis (frequency not known)
- Anaphylactic reactions (frequency not known)
- Hypersensitivity (frequency not known)
- skin disorders
- Urticaria (uncommon)
- Angioedema (frequency not known)
Pregnancy
- Baloxavir marboxil is not currently recommended for use in pregnant individuals due to insufficient safety and efficacy data for treating pregnant and postpartum patients.
Breast feeding
- Seek specialist advice. Baloxavir is licensed from 3 weeks of age and if there is lactational transfer this may not be disadvantageous to infants exposed to maternal influenza, though is unlikely to be protective
- Products that contain polyvalent cations may decrease plasma concentrations of baloxavir. Xofluza should not be taken with products that contain polyvalent cations such as laxatives, antacids or oral supplements containing iron, zinc, selenium, calcium or magnesium.
- Baloxavir marboxil might decrease the efficacy of Influenza vaccine (live). Manufacturer advises separating administration.
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza [UKHSA, 2025], the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza [NICE, 2014], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guideline Influenza infection [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion in a narrative review Influenza [Paules, 2017]. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of seasonal influenza.
Search dates
March 2019 - April 2024
Key search terms
The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCOhost MEDLINE (searched 21st March 2019). These were combined with filters to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and primary care relevant literature in EBSCOhost MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases.
S7 S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5 OR S6
S6 AB neuraminidase inhibitor* OR TI neuraminidase inhibitor*
S5 AB ( zanamivir or relenza or oseltamivir or tamiflu ) OR TI ( zanamivir or relenza or oseltamivir or tamiflu )
S4 (MH "Zanamivir")
S3 (MH "Oseltamivir")
S2 AB ( influenza* or flu ) OR TI ( influenza* or flu )
S1 (MH "Influenza, Human")
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- BMJ Best Practice (2024) Influenza infection. BMJ Publishing Group.
- BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- BNF (2025) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Bouter, K.P., Diepersloot, R.J., van Romunde, L.K., et al. (1991) Effect of epidemic influenza on ketoacidosis, pneumonia and death in diabetes mellitus: a hospital register survey of 1976-1979 in the Netherlands. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 12(1), 61-8. [Abstract]
- Burch, J., Paulden, M., Conti, S., et al. (2008) Antiviral drugs for the treatment of influenza: a systematic review and economic evaluation. National Institute for Health and Care Research. https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/# [Free Full-text]
- Eccles, R. (2006) Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter analgesics in the treatment of common cold and flu. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 31(4), 309-319. [Abstract]
- EMC (2021) SPC for Tamiflu 30 mg Hard Capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023) SPC for Relenza 5mg/dose inhalation powder. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025) SPC for xofluza 40 mg film coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Guppy, M.P.B., Mickan, S.M., Del Mar, C.B., et al. (2011) Advising patients to increase fluid intake for treating acute respiratory infections (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- IDSA (2019) Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 update on diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management of seasonal influenza. Clinical Infectious Diseases 68(6). [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Jefferson, T., Jones, M.A., Doshi, P., et al. (2014) Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children. The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- Jennings, R. and Read, R.C. (2005) Influenza in practice. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.
- Joshi, N., Caputo, G.M., Weitekamp, M.R. and Karchmer, A.W. (1999) Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine 341(25), 1906-1912. [Abstract]
- NICE (2014) Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment of influenza. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022) Fever in under 5s (QS64). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2023) Suspected acute respiratory infection in over 16s: assessment at first presentation and initial management. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NIHR (2016) Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of regulatory and mortality data. Health Technology Assessment. National Institute for Health Research. https://www.nihr.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- Paules, C. and Subbarao, K. (2017) Influenza. The Lancet. http://www.thelancet.com [Free Full-text]
- PHE (2014) The use of antivirals for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza: PHE summary of current guidance for healthcare professionals. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- PHE (2015) Influenza vaccination in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Preston, C.L (2024) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
- UKHSA (2021) Influenza: treatment and prophylaxis using anti-viral agents. UK Health Security Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2023a) Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') Chapter 19: Influenza. UK Health Security Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2023b) Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses in the UK, winter 2022 to 2023. UK Health Security Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2025) Influenza: treatment and prophylaxis using anti-viral agents. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2022) Use of zanamivir in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2023a) Influenza vaccination in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2023b) Use of osemtamivir in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]