This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Child health Ear, nose and throat

Otitis media - acute

Last revised in August 2024

Acute otitis media (AOM) is inflammation in the middle ear associated with an effusion, and accompanied by the rapid onset of ear infection

Otitis media - acute: Summary

  • Acute otitis media (AOM) is defined as the presence of inflammation in the middle ear, associated with an effusion, and accompanied by the rapid onset of symptoms and signs of an ear infection.
  • It is a common condition caused by viruses and bacteria.
  • AOM occurs frequently in children but is less common in adults.
    • It most commonly affects children from birth to 4 years of age, especially those who are subject to passive smoking, attend daycare or nursery, are formula-fed, or have craniofacial abnormalities (such as cleft palate).
  • Complications of AOM include recurrence of infection, hearing loss, tympanic membrane perforation, and rarely, mastoiditis, meningitis, intracranial abscess, sinus thrombosis, and facial nerve paralysis.
  • In older children and adults, AOM usually presents with earache. Younger children may hold or rub their ear or may have non-specific symptoms such as fever, crying, poor feeding, restlessness, cough, or rhinorrhoea.
  • On examination the tympanic membrane is distinctly red, yellow, or cloudy, and may be bulging.
  • Pain and fever should be managed with paracetamol or ibuprofen.
  • Many people with AOM will not need antibiotic treatment as symptoms usually resolve spontaneously within a few days. However, antibiotics are necessary in a number of situations, including for:
    • People who are systemically very unwell.
    • People who have symptoms and signs of a more serious illness or condition.
    • People who have a high risk of complications.
  • If an antibiotic is required, a 5–7 day course of amoxicillin is recommended first-line. Clarithromycin or erythromycin are alternatives for people who are allergic to penicillin (erythromycin is preferred in pregnant women).
  • The following groups of people should be admitted to hospital for immediate specialist assessment:
    • People with a severe systemic infection.
    • People with suspected complications of AOM, such as meningitis, mastoiditis, intracranial abscess, sinus thrombosis, or facial nerve paralysis.
    • Children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38°C or more.
  • Management of persistent AOM involves:
    • Reassessing the person.
    • Considering the need for paediatric or ENT referral or admission, depending on the clinical situation.
    • Considering a first-line antibiotic (if not already prescribed) or a second-line antibiotic if the initial treatment was ineffective.
  • Measures to prevent recurrent AOM include:
    • In children — avoiding exposure to passive smoking, use of dummies, and flat, supine feeding; and ensuring that children have had a complete course of pneumococcal vaccinations as part of the routine childhood immunization schedule.
    • In adults — avoiding smoking and/or passive smoking.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 1 month onwards.

This CKS topic is largely based on a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022]. 

This CKS topic covers the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media (AOM) and persistent and recurrent AOM.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of otitis media with effusion (glue ear), chronic suppurative otitis media, cholesteatoma, otitis externa, acute mastoiditis, or other complications of AOM.

There are separate CKS topics on Cholesteatoma, Otitis externa, Otitis media - chronic suppurative, and Otitis media with effusion.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

August 2024 — minor update. Adverse effects of co-amoxiclav updated in line with manufacturer's SPC.

Previous changes

May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contraindicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC. Additional information added to the basis for recommendation in the section on management about use of anaesthetic and analgesic drops.

February 2024 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to the topic, with no major changes to the clinical recommendations.

December 2023 — minor update. Update to drug interactions section for erythromycin to include information on interactions with Lomitapide and Corticosteroids, as per the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

July 2023 — minor update. The summary of manufacturer’s product characteristics for clarithromycin was updated to include a warning regarding concomitant treatment with domperidone (due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias).

May 2023 — minor update. Added potential adverse effects of co-amoxiclav to include Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can result in myocardial infarction), aseptic meningitis, linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA), and drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (all of unknown frequency). These adverse effects were noted in an update to the manufacturer’s summary of product characteristics. 

January 2021 — minor update. Contraindications and drug interactions for erythromycin have been updated in line with an MHRA drug safety update. 

July 2018 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in May 2018 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made. However, recommendations in the Acute otitis media - initial presentation and Persistent acute otitis media - treatment failure scenarios have been updated in line with the 2018 NICE guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing, and individual prescribing information sections for the recommended antibiotics have been added.

July 2015 — minor update. The information on the concurrent use of clarithromycin or erythromycin with statins has been clarified.

May 2015 — minor update. Typographical errors corrected.

January to March 2015 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2015 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made. However, the topic has undergone minor restructuring, and prescribing information sections for the recommended antibiotics have been added.

May 2014 — minor update. Links to prescriptions have been removed from the scenarios.

August 2013 — minor update. In Scenario: Acute diffuse otitis externa, the management node has been slightly reworded to clarify that in children younger than 3 months there should be a low threshold for admitting the child or for prescribing antibiotics, as appropriate.

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing. 

June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. 

April to July 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

The following important changes have been made to the previous CKS guidance:

  • In line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline, Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care, immediate antibiotics are no longer routinely recommended for:
    • All children younger than 6 months of age.
    • Children aged between 6 months and 2 years of age in whom the diagnosis of AOM is reasonably certain.
    • Children older than 2 years of age where there is moderate or severe earache with a fever of 39°C or above or bilateral acute otitis media.
  • In line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline, Feverish illness in children — Assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years, admission for specialist assessment is now recommended for:
    • Children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38°C or higher.
    • Children 3–6 months of age with a temperature of 39°C or higher.

February 2009 — minor update. Azithromycin added as a second-line antibiotic option for people who are allergic to penicillin, in line with updated advice from the Health Protection Agency. 

January 2007 — updated. Macrolide choices for people with penicillin allergy changed to erythromycin and clarithromycin, in line with advice from the Health Protection Agency. 

July to September 2006 — reviewed. Validated in December 2006 and issued in January 2007.

June 2007 — minor update. Amoxicillin prescription corrected. 

November 2005 — minor technical update. 

March 2004 — updated the recommended dose of amoxicillin. Validated in March 2004 and issued in June 2004.

July 2003 — rewritten. Validated in September 2003 and issued in October 2003.

March 2001 — reviewed. Validated in July 2001 and issued in October 2001.

June 1999 — reviewed.

April 1998 — reviewed.

January 1997 — new topic.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 January 2024.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 January 2024.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 January 2024.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • Sirota, S. B., Doxey, M. C., Dominguez, R. M. V., et al. (2024). Global, regional, and national burden of upper respiratory infections and otitis media, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. [Abstract]

Primary evidence

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 January 2024.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 January 2024.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since January 2024.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Make an accurate diagnosis of acute otitis media (AOM).
  • Prescribe antibiotic and analgesic treatment in primary care, if appropriate.
  • Admit or refer to secondary care, if appropriate.
  • Manage people with persistent or recurrent AOM.
  • Give advice on measures to reduce the risk of recurrent episodes.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

​​​​​​Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs):

  • Regularly review the appropriateness of NSAID prescribing, particularly in older people and/or those at higher risk of gastrointestinal (GI), cardiovascular or renal morbidity and mortality.
  • Consider switching to a lower-risk NSAID or stopping treatment where appropriate.
  • Consider alternatives to oral NSAIDs, such as topical NSAIDs, physiotherapy or a different analgesic, such as paracetamol or an opioid, before prescribing NSAIDs.
  • When prescribing NSAIDs, choose those with the lowest cardiovascular, renal and/or GI risk, depending upon the individual person's risk factors.
  • If more than one product is suitable, choose the product with the lowest acquisition cost. 
  • Do not prescribe NSAIDs when contraindicated, and only prescribe NSAIDs to people at risk of renal impairment or failure when use is unavoidable.
  • Use the lowest effective dose and the shortest duration of treatment necessary to control symptoms.
  • Ibuprofen (1,200 mg a day or less) or naproxen (1,000 mg a day or less) are generally preferred for safety reasons.
  • Co-prescribe a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with NSAIDs for people with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, those who are elderly, those with lower back pain, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis or other peripheral spondyloarthritides, and those at moderate or high risk for GI adverse effects.

Antimicrobial stewardship — Prescribing antibiotics:

[PrescQIPP, 2020]

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is it?

  • Acute otitis media (AOM) is defined as the presence of inflammation in the middle ear, associated with an effusion and accompanied by the rapid onset of symptoms and signs of an ear infection [Lieberthal, 2013; Heidemann, 2016].  
    • This should be differentiated from otitis media with effusion (OME), which is characterised by fluid in the middle ear, but is not associated with symptoms and signs of an acute ear infection [Lieberthal, 2013; Schilder, 2016]. For more information, see the CKS topic on Otitis media with effusion.
  • Persistent AOM is defined as people who return for medical advice with the same episode of AOM, either because symptoms persist after initial management or because symptoms are worsening.
  • Recurrent AOM is usually defined as 3or more well-documented and separate AOM episodes in the preceding 6 months, or four or more episodes in the preceding 12 months with at least one episode in the past 6 months [Lieberthal, 2013]. 

What causes it?

  • Acute otitis media (AOM) can be caused by both viruses and bacteria, and commonly both are present at the same time [NICE, 2022].  
    • The most common bacterial pathogens are Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pyogenes [Atkinson, 2015]. 
      • Since the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, there have been changes in the proportions of isolates of different bacteria from AOM infections, with an initial decrease in infections caused by S. pneumoniae. However, S. pneumoniae is still a significant pathogen due to increasing prevalence of other serotypes not covered by the vaccine [Atkinson, 2015; Ngo, 2016; Kaur, 2017]. 
    • Viral pathogens associated with AOM include respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza virus, and parainfluenza virus [Schilder, 2016]. 
  • In recurrent AOM, the microbiology may be more complex, but the most common bacterial pathogens are the same as occasional episodes [Granath, 2017].

How common is it?

  • Acute otitis media (AOM) occurs frequently in children but is less common in adults [Atkinson, 2015; Le Saux, 2016]. Children are more likely to develop AOM because they acquire viral infections more often than adults, and have shorter and more horizontal eustachian tubes [Le Saux, 2016].
    • In 2012, AOM accounted for over half a million primary care consultations in England [Atkinson, 2015].
    • Children from birth to 4 years of age are most likely to present with AOM [de Lusignan, 2017]. It most frequently affects children between 6 and 24 months old, with incidence peaking at 9–15 months of age [Rosa-Olivares, 2015]. Between 50% and 85% will have experienced at least one episode of AOM by the time they reach 3 years old [Gaddey, 2019].
    • Prevalence varies globally, with an average incidence rate of 3.6 new episodes per 100 people per year in central Europe compared with 43.4 for Sub-Saharan West Africa and Central Africa [Monasta, 2012].
    • There is a seasonal variation in cases, with AOM occurring most commonly in the winter, and in children born in the autumn [Atkinson, 2015]. 

What are the risk factors?

  • Risk factors for developing acute otitis media (AOM) include:
    • Young age.
    • Male sex.
    • Smoking and/or passive smoking.
    • Frequent contact with other children such as daycare or nursery attendance or having siblings (increases exposure to viral illnesses).
    • Formula feeding — breastfeeding has a protective effect.
    • Craniofacial abnormalities (such as cleft palate).
    • Use of a dummy.
    • Prolonged bottle feeding in the supine position.
    • Family history of otitis media.
    • Lack of pneumococcal vaccination.
    • Gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    • Prematurity.
    • Recurrent upper respiratory tract infection.
    • Immunodeficiency.

[Atkinson, 2015; Le Saux, 2016; Schilder, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]

What is the prognosis?

What are the complications?

  • Complications of acute otitis media (AOM) include [Atkinson, 2015; Venekamp, 2023; NICE, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]: 
    • Persistent otitis media with effusion.
    • Chronic suppurative otitis media.
    • Recurrence of infection.
    • Hearing loss (usually conductive and temporary).
    • Tympanic membrane perforation — a chronic perforation may develop, defined as a perforation that does not close within 3 months of AOM.
    • Labyrinthitis.
    • Rarely, mastoiditis, meningitis, intracranial abscess, sinus thrombosis, and facial nerve paralysis.

Diagnosis of acute otitis media

How should I make a diagnosis of acute otitis media?

  • Diagnose acute otitis media (AOM) if there is:
    • Acute onset of symptoms, including:
      • In older children and adults — earache.
      • In younger children — holding, tugging, or rubbing of the ear, or non-specific symptoms such as fever, crying, poor feeding, restlessness, behavioural changes, cough, or rhinorrhoea. Note that these non-specific symptoms do not help differentiate AOM from upper respiratory tract infection.
    • On otoscopic examination:
      • A distinctly red, yellow, or cloudy tympanic membrane.
      • Moderate to severe bulging of the tympanic membrane, with loss of normal landmarks and an air-fluid level behind the tympanic membrane (indicates a middle ear effusion).
      • Perforation of the tympanic membrane and/or discharge in the external auditory canal.
  • Consider whether findings may be explained by other causes of middle ear inflammation or effusion.
    • Note that clinical features not suggestive of AOM include a tympanic membrane that is not bulging (with or without erythema or cloudiness) and an air-fluid level without a bulging tympanic membrane.
  • In children younger than 6 months of age (and particularly younger than 3 months of age), diagnosis can be difficult because: 
    • There may be coexisting systemic illness, such as bronchiolitis or bacteraemia.
    • Symptoms are likely to be non-specific.
    • The tympanic membrane may not be visible; it often lies in an oblique position and the ear canal is small and tends to collapse.
  • Red flag symptoms which can indicate serious complications (such as mastoiditis and/or intracranial infection) include:
    • Headache.
    • Nystagmus or blurred vision.
    • Nausea or vomiting.
    • Photophobia.
    • Vertigo.
    • Fever.
    • Labyrinthitis.
    • Facial paralysis.
    • Swelling/erythema/tenderness behind the ear.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on a US clinical guideline The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013], a Canadian position statement Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older [Le Saux, 2016], expert opinion published in a systematic review Does this child have acute otitis media? [Rothman, 2003], and narrative review articles [Powers, 2007; Atkinson, 2015; Rosa-Olivares, 2015; Finnikin, 2016; Schilder, 2016; Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Accurate diagnosis and antimicrobial stewardship

  • A Canadian position statement on the diagnosis and management of AOM [Le Saux, 2016] emphasises the importance of accurate diagnosis for determining which children with AOM will most likely experience a faster recovery with antibiotics. Such an approach was considered likely to help minimise antibiotic use and thereby decrease the risk of antibiotic resistance and adverse effects.
  • There is no gold standard set of criteria for the diagnosis of AOM [Lieberthal, 2013; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • Of the spectrum of signs that occur as the disease develops, moderate to severe bulging of the tympanic membrane is the most helpful in making the diagnosis. The combination of a cloudy, bulging tympanic membrane with impaired mobility is the best predictor of AOM [Lieberthal, 2013].
  • Although non-specific, symptoms of an upper respiratory infection that may be ongoing or resolving are common among people with AOM. Other common features include otalgia, irritability, sleep disturbance and fever [Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Red flags

  • Symptoms such as altered conscious level, vomiting, photophobia, and persistent headache may indicate an intracranial complication (for example, meningitis, or temporal lobe or extradural/subdural abscess) [Atkinson, 2015].

What else might it be?

  • Other causes of middle ear inflammation or effusion include:
    • Otitis media with effusion (glue ear) — fluid in the middle ear without symptoms or signs of acute infection. On examination with an otoscope, an effusion and air-fluid levels or bubbles are visible, with normal tympanic membrane landmarks. The most common presentation is conductive hearing loss. For more information, see the CKS topic on Otitis media with effusion.
    • Chronic suppurative otitis media — persistent inflammation and perforation of the tympanic membrane with draining discharge for more than 2 weeks. For more information, see the CKS topic on Otitis media - chronic suppurative.
    • Myringitis — erythema and injection of the tympanic membrane are visible on otoscopy but there are no other features of otitis media. 
    • Mastoiditis — a rare complication where bacterial otitis media extends into the mastoid air cells.
    • Cholesteatoma — suggested by chronic malodorous ear discharge, and the presence of squamous epithelium and keratin in the middle ear. See the CKS topic on Cholesteatoma for more information.
    • Neoplasm — a rare cause but suggested by malignant cervical lymph node enlargement; or friable, bleeding lesions, which might suggest squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma. Pigmented lesions may suggest melanoma. 
    • Osteonecrosis of the external auditory canal — consider in people receiving denosumab and/or bisphosphonates who present with chronic ear infection or suspected cholesteatoma.
  • Earache is a common problem, and can also be caused by otitis externa (for more information, see the CKS topic on Otitis externa). Causes of ear pain also include eustachian tube dysfunction, foreign bodies, impacted ear wax, and referred pain (for example dental or odontogenic pain). 

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion from narrative review articles [Finnikin, 2016; Schilder, 2016; Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Management

Scenario: Acute otitis media - initial presentation

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage people at initial presentation?

  • Admit for immediate specialist assessment:
    • People with a severe systemic infection.
    • Adults and children with red flag symptoms suggesting complications of acute otitis media (AOM), such as meningitis, mastoiditis, intracranial abscess, sinus thrombosis, or facial nerve paralysis.
    • Children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38°C or more. See the CKS topic on Feverish children - risk assessment and management for more information. 
  • Consider admitting:
    • Children younger than 3 months of age. 
    • Children 3–6 months of age with a temperature of 39°C or more.
  • For all people with AOM:
    • Advise that the usual course of acute otitis media is about 3 days, but can be up to 1 week. 
    • Advise regular doses of paracetamol or ibuprofen for pain, using a dosing schedule appropriate for the age and weight of a child. For more information, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
    • Explain that there is no evidence to support the use of decongestants or antihistamines for the management of symptoms.
    • Advise that AOM does not require any restrictions from usual daily activities, but swimming should be avoided if there is evidence of tympanic membrane perforation, and ear pain may worsen with air travel.
      • Children may return to school or daycare once they are afebrile and the otalgia has resolved.
  • For people who do not require admission to hospital but are systemically unwell, have symptoms and signs of a more serious illness or condition, or have a high risk of complications:
    • Offer an immediate antibiotic prescription. 
    • Advise them to seek medical advice if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly, or if they become systemically very unwell.
  • For people who may be more likely to benefit from antibiotics (those with otorrhoea or those aged less than 2 years with bilateral infection), take account of evidence that acute complications such as mastoiditis are rare with or without antibiotics and the potential adverse effects of antibiotics, and consider:
    • No antibiotic prescription — with advice about an antibiotic not being needed and seeking medical help if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly, do not improve after 3 days, or the person becomes systemically very unwell, or
    • A back-up antibiotic prescription — with advice about an antibiotic not being needed immediately; using the back-up prescription if symptoms do not start to improve within 3 days or worsen significantly or rapidly at any time; and seeking medical help if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly, or the person becomes systemically very unwell, or 
    • An immediate antibiotic prescription — with advice to seek medical advice if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly or the person becomes systemically very unwell.
    • Analgesic and anaesthetic ear drops — where immediate antibiotics are not prescribed, prescribe ear drops containing an analgesic and anaesthetic for children or young people under the age of 18 where there is no ear drum perforation or otorrhoea.
  • For other people who may be less likely to benefit from antibiotics, take into account that antibiotics make little difference to symptoms or the development of common complications (which are rare with or without antibiotics), and the potential adverse effects of antibiotics, and consider: 
    • No antibiotic prescription — with advice about an antibiotic not being needed and seeking medical help if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly, do not improve after 3 days, or the person becomes systemically very unwell, or 
    • A back-up antibiotic prescription — with advice about an antibiotic not being needed immediately; using the back-up prescription if symptoms do not start to improve within 3 days or worsen significantly or rapidly at any time; and seeking medical help if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly, or the person becomes systemically very unwell. 
    • Analgesic and anaesthetic ear drops — where immediate antibiotics are not prescribed, prescribe ear drops containing an analgesic and anaesthetic for children or young people under the age of 18 where there is no ear drum perforation or otorrhoea.
  • If an antibiotic is required: 
    • Prescribe a 5–7 day course of amoxicillin.
    • For people who are allergic to, or intolerant of, penicillin, prescribe a 5–7 day course of clarithromycin or erythromycin (erythromycin is preferred in pregnant women).
    • The second choice oral antibiotic is to prescribe a 5-7 day course of co-amoxiclav where there are worsening symptoms on the first choice antibiotic taken for at least 2-3 days. Where a person has a penicillin allergy or is intolerant, seek specialist advice from the local microbiology department. 
  • Review treatment if symptoms do not improve within 7 days or at any time if symptoms worsen, taking account of: 
    • Alternative diagnoses, such as otitis media with effusion (glue ear). For more information, see the CKS topic on Otitis media with effusion. 
    • Any symptoms or signs suggesting a more serious illness or condition. For more information, see the sections on Complications and Differential diagnosis. 
    • Previous antibiotic use which may lead to resistant organisms.
  • Routine follow up is not required in the absence of persistent symptoms of AOM.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022], Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management [NICE, 2021], a US guideline The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013], a Canadian position statement Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older [Le Saux, 2016], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews Topical analgesia for acute otitis media [Foxlee, 2006], Paracetamol (acetaminophen) or non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, alone or combined, for pain relief in acute otitis media in children [de Sévaux, 2023], Short-course antibiotics for acute otitis media [Kozyrskyj, 2010], and Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children [Venekamp, 2023], a meta-analysis [Rovers, 2006], randomized controlled trials [Hay, 2019], and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Atkinson, 2015; Gaddey, 2019; UKTIS, 2020; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Criteria for admission
  • The recommendations to immediately admit people with a severe systemic infection or suspected acute complications of otitis media for specialist assessment are based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022]. 
  • The recommendation to admit children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38ºC or more for immediate paediatric assessment is based on guidance from NICE [NICE, 2021; NICE, 2022].
  • CKS recommends considering admission in this age group on the basis that a diagnosis of AOM may be difficult to determine and exclusion of more serious causes may be required.
  • Based on NICE guidance, children aged 3–6 months with a temperature of 39ºC or more are in at least an intermediate risk group for serious illness, so CKS advises using clinical judgement to consider admitting this group [NICE, 2021].
Self-care advice for all people with acute otitis media
  • This recommendation is based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022] and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date May 2023) on paracetamol or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief in acute otitis media in children included four randomised controlled trials (n = 411). The authors were unable to draw firm conclusions on the comparative efficacy or safety of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Low-quality evidence suggested that paracetamol and ibuprofen, when used individually, were more effective than placebo in terms of pain relief at 48 hours [de Sévaux, 2023]:   
    • Paracetamol compared with placebo (n = 148, one trial): 10% compared with 25% of children with pain at 48 hours; with the risk of ongoing pain at 48 hours reduced (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.85).
    • Ibuprofen compared with placebo (n = 146, one trial): 7% compared with 25% of children with pain at 48 hours; with the risk of ongoing pain at 48 hours reduced (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.70).
    • The number needed to treat to benefit was calculated as 7 for paracetamol and 6 for ibuprofen.
Immediate antibiotics for people who are systemically unwell, have symptoms and signs of a more serious illness or condition, or are at high risk of complications
  • The recommendation to offer an immediate antibiotic prescription to people who are systemically unwell, have symptoms and signs of a more serious illness or condition, or are at high risk of complications is based on the expert opinion of the NICE committee for the guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022].
  • This recommendation is aligned with US guidelines and a Canadian position statement on the management of AOM [Lieberthal, 2013; Le Saux, 2016] and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Prescribing strategies for other groups
  • The recommendations on antibiotic and ear drop prescribing strategies reflect the expert opinion of the NICE committee for the guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022], taking into account evidence from a Cochrane systematic review [Venekamp, 2023], and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. 
    • The committee accepted that most children with acute otitis media require no antibiotic or a backup antibiotic prescription but that an immediate antibiotic prescription could be considered in children younger than two years of age with bilateral AOM, or of any age with both AOM and ear discharge (based on clinical judgement) because antibiotics were more likely to be beneficial in these groups [NICE, 2022].
  • NICE noted that [NICE, 2022]:  
    • Both viral and bacterial infections causing acute otitis media are usually self-limiting and do not routinely require antibiotics.
    • Use of anaesthetic and analgesic ear drops has been associated with a statistically significant increase in the proportion of children with a 50% and a 25% reduction in pain compared with placebo by 10 minutes post-administration (NNT 5 [range 3 to 16] for 50% pain reduction; low-quality evidence). This was based on a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs [Foxlee, 2006]. These children were aged 3 years and over without ear drum perforation and were also having oral analgesia.
    • Use of anaesthetic and analgesic ear drops has been associated with a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of children consuming antibiotics at day 8 compared with usual care (no or delayed antibiotic prescription at the time of randomization; 2.6% compared with 29.0%; moderate quality evidence). There was also a statistically significant reduction in parent-reported pain scores at day 2 (low-quality evidence). This was based on an RCT in children aged 1 to 10 years who did not need immediate antibiotics [Hay, 2019]. Most children (88%) were also having oral analgesia.
      • CKS notes that an anaesthetic and analgesic ear drop product is available and licensed for use in both adults and children. However, as acute otitis media is rare in adults, guidelines focus on management in children, and the limited evidence to support the use of these drops in management of acute otitis media is based on studies in children, CKS has not made a recommendation for use in adults.   
    • There is evidence to suggest that antibiotics do not make a significant difference to ear pain, complication rates, or short-term hearing loss.
    • Serious complications are rare, and the numbers needed to treat with antibiotics to prevent them are very high (around 5000 for mastoiditis).
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date February 2023) identified 13 randomized controlled trials (n = 3401, 3938 AOM episodes) of antibiotic treatment for AOM in children [Venekamp, 2023]. It showed some benefit from antibiotic use for acute otitis media compared with placebo, but the absolute differences in some of the comparisons were small: 
    • Of the children in these trials, 60% had recovered 24 hours after starting treatment, regardless of whether they were allocated to antibiotic treatment or placebo.
    • Pain was not reduced at 24 hours (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.01) but there was a reduction in the number of children experiencing pain at 2–3 days (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86; number needed to treat to benefit one person [NNTB] 20), 4–7 days (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91; NNTB 16) and 10–12 days (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.66; NNTB 7) when comparing antibiotic and placebo-treated children.
    • There was a small increase in the risk of adverse events such as vomiting, diarrhoea or rash (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.63; number needed to treat for one child to experience harm [NNTH] 14) when comparing antibiotic and placebo-treated children. This finding suggests that for every 14 children treated with antibiotics, one will experience an adverse event that would not have happened if they were not on antibiotics. 
    • Abnormal tympanometry was reduced at 2–4 weeks (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96 NNTB 11) in the antibiotic group compared with placebo.
    • Tympanic membrane perforations were reduced in the antibiotic group compared with placebo (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.89; NNTB 33), as were the numbers of otitis media in the contralateral ear (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.95; NNTB 11).
    • Antibiotics did not reduce the number of children with abnormal tympanometry at 3 months or late AOM recurrences when compared with placebo.
  • A comparison of immediate antibiotics and expectant observation in four trials (n = 1007, moderate quality evidence), found no difference in [Venekamp, 2023]:  
    • Pain between the antibiotic and expectant observation groups at 3–7 days (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.12) or 11–14 days in a subgroup of 247 children (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.10). Pain may be reduced at 2-3 days (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.79, NNTB 8), but the authors considered this to be based on low-certainty evidence.
    • Abnormal tympanometry findings at 4 weeks.
    • Tympanic membrane perforations.
    • Recurrence of acute otitis media.
  • Based on the findings of a meta-analysis of individual participant data collected from six trials (n = 1643 children), antibiotics appear most useful in children under two years of age with bilateral AOM (NNTB 4), or with both AOM and otorrhoea (NNTB 3) [Rovers, 2006].
  • An observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (UK primary care records) has described the incidence of serious complications following AOM, and investigated whether antibiotics could be protective [Cushen, 2020].
    • The incidences of brain abscess and acute mastoiditis following AOM were 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.20) and 5.62 (95% CI 4.81 to 6.56) per 10 000 AOM episodes, respectively.
    • Antibiotic prescription for AOM was associated with lower odds of developing acute mastoiditis (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.79), but the NNT to prevent one case was 2181 (95% CI 1196 to 5709). 
    • The study was unable to assess the benefit of antibiotics in preventing brain abscess, as there were no exposed patients with this complication recorded in the study dataset.
    • The authors concluded that these data show that serious complications following AOM are rare, and although antibiotics are associated with lower odds of developing complications, the NNTB can be large. These data therefore support maintaining the current recommendations to avoid prescription of antibiotics in the majority of cases of AOM.
Choice of antibiotic and duration of treatment
  • Recommendations on the choice and duration of antibiotic are based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2024], and the BNF for Children [BNFC, 2024].  
  • NICE reviewed evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis and found no major differences between different classes of antibiotics in terms of treatment effectiveness [NICE, 2022].  
    • The NICE committee based the choice of antibiotic on resistance risk, and decided amoxicillin is most appropriate because although phenoxymethylpenicillin is likely to be effective and has a lower risk of resistance, the use of amoxicillin is current practice with an acceptable resistance risk, and it has a more convenient dosing schedule [NICE, 2022].  
    • Clarithromycin and erythromycin are recommended as alternative first-line choices based on the experience of the NICE committee and resistance data. Azithromycin is another option, but this is not recommended because the NICE committee were of the opinion that this should be reserved for more serious infections [NICE, 2022].
    • Erythromycin is considered the macrolide of choice during pregnancy because there is more documented experience than with other macrolide antibiotics, and erythromycin is considered to be a safe and effective antibiotic during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date November 2009) identified 49 trials (n = 12,045) comparing short courses of antibiotics (less than seven days) with long courses (seven days or longer) for the treatment of AOM in children [Kozyrskyj, 2010]. The review found that compared with short courses, long courses of antibiotics reduced short-term treatment failure (21% treatment failure for short courses compared with 18% for long courses), but had no benefit in the longer term compared with short courses.
    • The NICE committee reviewed this evidence and concluded that a 5–7 day course of antibiotics is appropriate for acute otitis media in children and that the shortest course possible should be prescribed to minimise the risk of resistance, noting the small absolute difference in treatment failure of with antibiotic courses of less than 7 days compared with 7 days or more [NICE, 2022].  
Reassessment if symptoms worsen rapidly and significantly
  • This recommendation is based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022], and expert opinion published in a narrative review [Gaddey, 2019].
  • A Canadian position statement on the management of AOM discusses the importance of evaluation and possible imaging if it is suspected that infection has spread beyond the middle ear (for example, mastoiditis). Other potential complications include acute facial nerve palsy, labyrinthitis, and venous sinus thrombosis [Le Saux, 2016]. Symptoms such as altered conscious level, vomiting, photophobia, and persistent headache may indicate an intracranial complication (for example, meningitis, or temporal lobe or extradural/subdural abscess) [Atkinson, 2015].  
Routine follow up not required
  • Routine follow up in the absence of persistent symptoms is not discussed in the NICE guideline [NICE, 2022].
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics guideline on the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media also found limited evidence to support a routine follow up visit for all children with acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013]. 

Scenario: Persistent acute otitis media - treatment failure

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage persistent symptoms and treatment failure?

  • If an episode of acute otitis media (AOM) fails to improve or worsens, reassess the person and exclude other causes of middle ear inflammation and pain.
    • If there is hearing loss in the absence of pain or fever, see the CKS topic on Otitis media with effusion.
    • If there is discharge from the ear canal persisting for 2 weeks, see the CKS topic on Otitis media - chronic suppurative.
    • Consider referring adults with persistent acute otitis media to an ear, nose, and throat specialist, especially if symptoms last more than 6 weeks or are associated with persistent hearing loss.  
  • Admit for immediate specialist assessment:
    • People with a severe systemic infection.
    • Adults and children with red flag symptoms suggestive of acute complications of acute otitis media (AOM), such as meningitis, mastoiditis, intracranial abscess, sinus thrombosis, or facial nerve paralysis.
    • Children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38°C or more. See the CKS topic on Feverish children - risk assessment and management for more information.
  • Consider admitting:
    • Children younger than 3 months of age. 
    • Children 3–6 months of age with a temperature of 39°C or more.
  • For all people with AOM:
    • Advise regular doses of paracetamol or ibuprofen for pain, using a dosing schedule appropriate for the age and weight of a child. For more information, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
    • Explain that there is no evidence to support the use of decongestants or antihistamines for the management of symptoms.
  • If admission or referral is not necessary and the person has not taken an antibiotic: 
    • Prescribe a 5–7 day course of amoxicillin.
    • For people who are allergic to, or intolerant of, penicillin, prescribe a 5–7 day course of clarithromycin or erythromycin (erythromycin is preferred in pregnant women).
  • If admission or referral is not necessary and symptoms are worsening despite taking a first-line antibiotic for at least 2–3 days, offer a second–line antibiotic: 
    • Prescribe a 5–7 day course of co-amoxiclav. 
    • For people who are allergic to, or intolerant of, penicillin, seek specialist advice from the local microbiology department.
  • If symptoms persist despite two courses of antibiotics, seek specialist advice from a local microbiologist or an Ear, Nose and Throat specialist if the diagnosis is uncertain. 

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022], Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management [NICE, 2021], a US guideline The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013], a Canadian position statement Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older [Le Saux, 2016], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews Topical analgesia for acute otitis media [Foxlee, 2006], Paracetamol (acetaminophen) or non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, alone or combined, for pain relief in acute otitis media in children [de Sévaux, 2023], Short-course antibiotics for acute otitis media [Kozyrskyj, 2010], Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children [Venekamp, 2023], randomized controlled trials [Hay, 2019], and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Atkinson, 2015; UKTIS, 2020].

Reassessment if acute otitis media fails to improve or worsens
  • This recommendation is based on expert opinion in a Canadian Paediatric Society position statement and a US guideline on the management of otitis media in children [Lieberthal, 2013; Le Saux, 2016].
    • Re-evaluation of a person with persistent or worsening symptoms because there should be improvement within 2–3 days of antibiotic treatment [Le Saux, 2016]. If not, symptoms could be due to another disease, a viral infection, or persistent AOM due to antibiotic resistance. Reassessment also enables identification of complications [Lieberthal, 2013; Le Saux, 2016].  
  • NICE guidance also recommends a review of treatment if symptoms do not improve within 7 days or worsen at any time [NICE, 2022].
Exclusion of other causes of middle ear inflammation and pain
  • This recommendation is pragmatic and reflects discussion in a US guideline that if a person's AOM symptoms have not improved after 48 to 72 hours of antibiotic treatment, they could be due to another disease, or a viral infection [Lieberthal, 2013].  
  • A small observational study of 82 patients with parapharyngeal tumours identified a high prevalence of otitis media with effusion (OME) among patients with malignant lesions when compared to those with benign lesions [Tsunoda, 2021]. The authors of this study state that OME is a well-known primary symptom of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and they also state that Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialists often consider the possibility of this diagnosis in adult cases of intractable OME. CKS therefore recommends considering the referral of adults with persistent otitis media to exclude more serious underlying conditions such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Criteria for admission
  • The recommendations to immediately admit people with a severe systemic infection or suspected acute complications of otitis media for specialist assessment are based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022]. 
  • The recommendation to admit children younger than 3 months of age with a temperature of 38ºC or more for immediate paediatric assessment is based on guidance from NICE [NICE, 2021; NICE, 2022].
  • Specific evidence on the most appropriate management of children younger than 3 months of age with suspected AOM is limited. CKS recommends considering admission in this age group on the basis that AOM may not be the sole diagnosis in a young child, and exclusion of more serious causes may be required.
  • Based on NICE guidance, children aged 3–6 months with a temperature of 39ºC or more are in at least an intermediate risk group for serious illness, so CKS advises using clinical judgement to consider admitting this group [NICE, 2021].
Self-care advice for all people with acute otitis media
  • This recommendation is based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022]. 
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date May 2023) on paracetamol or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief in acute otitis media (AOM) in children included four randomised controlled trials (n = 411). The authors were unable to draw firm conclusions on the comparative efficacy or safety of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Low-quality evidence suggested that paracetamol and ibuprofen, when used individually, were more effective than placebo in terms of pain relief at 48 hours [de Sévaux, 2023]:   
    • Paracetamol compared with placebo (n = 148, one trial): 10% compared with 25% of children with pain at 48 hours; with the risk of ongoing pain at 48 hours reduced (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.85).
    • Ibuprofen compared with placebo (n = 146, one trial): 7% compared with 25% of children with pain at 48 hours; with the risk of ongoing pain at 48 hours reduced (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.70).
    • The number needed to treat to benefit was calculated as 7 for paracetamol and 6 for ibuprofen.
Treatment strategy
  • These recommendations are taken from the NICE guidance which advises that most people get better within 3 days without antibiotics, and recommends using a back up antibiotic prescription if symptoms do not start to improve within 3 days with watchful waiting [NICE, 2022].
  • NICE guidance also recommends that children and young people under the age of 18 who are not prescribed an antibiotic and do not have eardrum perforation or otorrhoea have treatment with ear drops containing an anaesthetic and an analgesic [NICE, 2022].
    • Use of anaesthetic and analgesic ear drops has been associated with decreased antibiotic use in children with AOM [Hay, 2019].
  • It is reasonable to prescribe an antibiotic for a person with an episode of AOM which fails to improve within 3 days or worsens at any time if they have not already had antibiotic treatment [NICE, 2022]. This is supported by a US guideline which advises starting antibiotic treatment if a child with AOM worsens or does not improve within 48–72 hours of symptom onset [Lieberthal, 2013].
  • Findings from Cochrane systematic reviews provide evidence for the efficacy of topical analgesia for AOM [Foxlee, 2006], oral analgesia in AOM in children [de Sévaux, 2023], and antibiotics for AOM [Kozyrskyj, 2010; Venekamp, 2023].
Choice of first-line antibiotics
  • Recommendations on the choice and duration of antibiotic are based on NICE guidance [NICE, 2022], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2024], and the BNF for Children [BNFC, 2024]. 
  • NICE reviewed the evidence in a systematic review and meta-analysis and found no major differences between different classes of antibiotics in terms of treatment effectiveness [NICE, 2022]. 
    • The NICE committee therefore based the choice of antibiotic on resistance risk, and decided amoxicillin is most appropriate because although phenoxymethylpenicillin is likely to be effective and has a lower risk of resistance, the use of amoxicillin is current practice with an acceptable resistance risk, and it has a more convenient dosing schedule [NICE, 2022]. 
    • Clarithromycin and erythromycin are recommended as alternative first-line choices based on the experience of the NICE committee and resistance data. Azithromycin is another option, but this is not recommended because the NICE committee were of the opinion that this should be reserved for more serious infections [NICE, 2022].
    • Erythromycin is considered the macrolide of choice during pregnancy because there is more documented experience than with other macrolide antibiotics, and erythromycin is considered to be a safe and effective antibiotic during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date November 2009) identified 49 trials (n = 12,045) comparing short courses of antibiotics (less than seven days) with long courses (seven days or longer) for the treatment of AOM in children [Kozyrskyj, 2010]. The review found that compared with short courses, long courses of antibiotics reduced short-term treatment failure (21% treatment failure for short courses compared with 18% for long courses), but had no benefit in the longer term compared with short courses.
    • The NICE committee reviewed this evidence and concluded that a 5–7 day course of antibiotics is appropriate for acute otitis media in children and that the shortest course possible should be prescribed to minimise the risk of resistance, noting the small absolute difference in treatment failure with antibiotic courses of less than 7 days duration compared with 7 days or more [NICE, 2022].
Choice of second-line antibiotics
  • NICE guidance recommends co-amoxiclav as a second-choice antibiotic based on RCT evidence, resistance data, and clinical experience. Co-amoxiclav is active against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria that have resistance to amoxicillin, and a lack of response to amoxicillin may indicate resistance is present [NICE, 2022]. This recommendation is in line with advice in a US guideline and Canadian position statement regarding treatment failure in AOM [Lieberthal, 2013; Le Saux, 2016]. 
  • The recommendation to consult with a local microbiology department if the first-line antibiotic is not effective in a person with penicillin allergy is based on the NICE guidance [NICE, 2022]. 
Persistent symptoms despite two courses of antibiotics
  • In the absence of evidence for the management of people with persistent symptoms after two courses of antibiotics, the recommendation to seek specialist advice is pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
    • US guidelines and a Canadian position statement on the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media suggest a course of intramuscular ceftriaxone for children in the unusual event that symptoms are not improved with co-amoxiclav [Lieberthal, 2013; Le Saux, 2016], but CKS accepts this is not a practical choice in the UK primary care setting.

Scenario: Recurrent acute otitis media

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage a person with recurrent acute otitis media?

  • Refer urgently (within 2 weeks) using a suspected cancer pathway referral to an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist if nasopharyngeal cancer (rare) is suspected, especially in the presence of any one of the following:
    • Persistent symptoms and signs of otitis media with effusion in between episodes (for example conductive hearing loss) due to obstruction of the eustachian tube orifice. 
    • Persistent cervical lymphadenopathy (usually in the upper levels of the neck).
    • Epistaxis and nasal obstruction.
  • Consider referral to an ENT specialist for all people with recurrent AOM, especially if:
    • The person has a craniofacial abnormality (Down's syndrome or a cleft palate). 
    • Recurrent episodes are unexplained, very distressing, or associated with complications.
    • An adult is affected. 
  • If referral is not necessary:
    • Manage acute episodes in the same way as for initial presentation.
    • In people with grommets (tympanostomy or ventilation tubes) who present with acute discharge:
      • Consider taking an ear swab for culture and sensitivity.
      • Treat as for initial presentation or seek advice from an ENT specialist.
    • Provide advice on measures to prevent recurrence of AOM, including:
      • In children — avoiding exposure to passive smoking, use of dummies, and flat, supine feeding, encouraging breastfeeding where appropriate. 
      • In children — ensuring they have had a complete course of pneumococcal vaccinations as part of the routine childhood immunization schedule and that any gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is managed appropriately. For more information, see the CKS topics on Immunizations - childhood and GORD in children.
      • In adults — avoiding smoking and/or passive smoking.
  • Do not initiate long-term prophylactic antibiotics in primary care — prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of AOM are likely to be of limited benefit and may increase the selection of resistant bacteria.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children and young people: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2019], Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022], Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2023], US guidelines The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013] and Tympanostomy tubes in children [Rosenfeld, 2013], a Danish guideline Danish guidelines on management of otitis media in preschool children [Heidemann, 2016], a Canadian position statement Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older [Le Saux, 2016], a UK consensus statement on the Use of aminoglycoside-containing ear drops in the presence of an open middle ear [Phillips, 2007], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews Antibiotics for the prevention of acute and chronic suppurative otitis media in children [Leach, 2006] and Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing otitis media in children [de Sévaux, 2023], expert opinion from a textbook Advanced therapy of otitis media [Shah, 2003], and narrative review articles [Finnikin, 2016; Rosa-Olivares, 2015; Schilder, 2016; Granath, 2017; Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Initiate an urgent suspected cancer pathway referral to an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist
  • A small observational study of 82 patients with parapharyngeal tumours identified a high prevalence of otitis media with effusion (OME) among patients with malignant lesions when compared to those with benign lesions [Tsunoda, 2021]. The authors of this study state that OME is a well-known primary symptom of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and they also state that Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialists often consider the possibility of this diagnosis in adult cases of intractable OME. CKS therefore recommends considering the referral of adults with persistent otitis media to exclude more serious underlying conditions such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma. 
    • The features suggestive of nasopharyngeal cancer are based on UK national multidisciplinary guidelines on nasopharyngeal carcinoma [Simo, 2016].  
  • Although nasopharyngeal cancer is not specifically mentioned in the NICE guideline, CKS has recommended a suspected cancer pathway referral for an appointment within two weeks in line with NICE recommendations for other suspected head and neck cancers [NICE, 2023].  
Considering referral to an ENT specialist
  • This recommendation is based on expert opinion from a US guideline on the management of AOM suggesting that referral to an ENT specialist should be offered for consideration of tympanostomy tubes (grommets) for people with recurrent AOM (defined as three or more episodes in 6 months, or four or more episodes in 12 months with at least one episode in the past 6 months) in whom conservative measures have been ineffective [Lieberthal, 2013]. Danish guidelines [Heidemann, 2016] and expert opinion in review articles [Schilder, 2016; Gaddey, 2019], also discuss tympanostomy tubes as an appropriate option for children with recurrent AOM with middle ear effusion.
  • Based on expert opinion from a review article, adults with recurrent AOM (more than two episodes per year) should be referred [Gaddey, 2019]. CKS recommends that this may be particularly valuable for those who do not have a lifelong history of middle ear disease.
  • Expert opinion in a review article also advises referral if recurrent episodes are unexplained or cholesteatoma is suspected [Finnikin, 2016]. The recommendation to refer a person with complications is also extrapolated from the NICE guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing, which advises referral of children and young people who have acute complications and are systemically unwell or have symptoms or signs of a more serious illness or condition [NICE, 2022].
  • People with craniofacial abnormalities are generally excluded from trials. Expert opinion in the textbook Advanced therapy of otitis media is that referral is recommended for this group of people because they are at high risk of recurrent AOM and are less likely to spontaneously improve with age [Shah, 2003].
General management if referral is not necessary
  • The recommendation to manage acute episodes of recurrent acute otitis media in the same way as for initial presentation is extrapolated from expert opinion in a Swedish review article that discusses the use of watchful waiting and antibiotic treatment for children with recurrent acute otitis media experiencing a symptomatic episode [Granath, 2017]. Based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice, an episode of AOM which occurs more than 14 days after completing antibiotic treatment should be considered a new episode, and management as for an initial presentation is recommended.
Management of people with grommets (tympanostomy tubes) who present with acute discharge
  • There is insufficient evidence on the most effective treatment of AOM in people with grommets (ventilation or tympanostomy tubes). Taking an ear swab for culture and sensitivity is pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
    • Seeking specialist advice is recommended as an alternative to routine management on the basis that topical treatment is advised for people with grommets and otorrhoea by an ENT UK consensus statement [Phillips, 2007], a US clinical practice guideline on tympanostomy tubes in children [Rosenfeld, 2013], and expert opinion in a narrative review article [Granath, 2017].
    • Avoidance of oral antibiotics reduces the risks of their adverse effects and bacterial resistance, but CKS advises seeking specialist advice on the choice of topical treatment because of the potential for ototoxicity with aminoglycoside-containing ear drops [Rosenfeld, 2013]. 
Measures to prevent the recurrence of AOM
  • The recommendations for children are extrapolated from risk factors for AOM discussed in a US guideline on the management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013], a Canadian Paediatric Society position statement [Le Saux, 2016], NICE guidance on Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: recognition, diagnosis and management in children and young people, which states that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a risk factor for frequent AOM [NICE, 2019], and expert opinion in a review articles [Rosa-Olivares, 2015; Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • The recommendation to ensure that children have had a complete course of pneumococcal vaccinations (PCVs) as part of the routine childhood immunization schedule is also based on evidence from a Cochrane systematic review of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing otitis media in children (n = 60,733 children, search date June 2020) [de Sévaux, 2023]. Data from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 7-, 10- and 11-valent PCVs were included in the review (no studies were located of the 13-valent vaccine). Due to considerable clinical heterogeneity between the trials, meta-analysis was not performed.
    • The results demonstrated large relative risk reductions in pneumococcal AOM where PCV was administered in early infancy, but vaccine effects on all-cause AOM were uncertain. 
    • The 7-valent vaccine administered in early infancy was associated with a 5% increase in all-cause AOM in high-risk infants, and a 6% decrease in low-risk infants. 
    • The 10-valent vaccine administered to healthy infants in early infancy was associated with a 6-15% reduction in the risk of all-cause AOM, but these findings were not statistically significant. This vaccine was associated with a 53% reduction in pneumococcal AOM.
    • The 11-valent vaccine administered to healthy infants in early infancy was associated with a 53% reduction in pneumococcal AOM.
    • When the 9-valent vaccine was administered in healthy children aged 12–35 months old, AOM episodes were reduced by 17%, but this was not statistically significant.
  • The recommendation for adults is pragmatic, based on the fact that environmental tobacco smoke is a recognized risk factor for developing AOM [Lieberthal, 2013; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].  
Prophylactic antibiotics
  • There is evidence from a Cochrane systematic review on antibiotics for the prevention of acute and chronic suppurative otitis media in children (n = 1586, search date August 2010) that long-term antibiotics reduce the risk of any further episodes (as well as the number of episodes) of AOM while the person is taking them. The pooled results indicated that approximately 5 children would need to be treated with long-term prophylactic antibiotics to prevent one additional case of AOM, and for every 12 months of treatment, antibiotics would prevent 1.5 episodes of AOM [Leach, 2006]. 
  • However, CKS has based the recommendation to avoid starting long-term prophylactic antibiotics in primary care on a US guideline and expert opinion in a review articles, which, taking into consideration the small reduction of AOM episodes, cost, potential adverse effects, and risk of bacterial resistance, agree that long-term prophylactic antibiotics should not be used to reduce the frequency of episodes for people with recurrent AOM [Lieberthal, 2013; Schilder, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF) .

Prescribing paracetamol and ibuprofen

For information on prescribing paracetamol and ibuprofen, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues. 

Amoxicillin

Dosing regime

  • The treatment duration for acute otitis media is 5–7 days.
  • In children, prescribe: 
    • Child 1–11 months: 125 mg three times a day.
    • Child 1–4 years: 250 mg three times a day.
    • Child 5–17 years: 500 mg three times a day.
  • The dose should be reduced in children (weighing 40 kg or less) with renal impairment:
    • If the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is 10–30 mL/minute, prescribe 15 mg/kg twice daily (maximum 500 mg twice daily).
    • If the GFR is less than 10 mL/minute, prescribe 15 mg/kg, but only once daily (maximum 500 mg).
  • In adults, prescribe 500 mg three times a day.
  • The dose should be reduced in adults (and children weighing more than 40 kg) with renal impairment. If the GFR is less than 30 mL/minute an increase in the dosage interval and a reduction in the total daily dose is recommended: 
    • If GFR is 10–30 mL/minute, prescribe a maximum 500 mg twice a day.
    • If GFR is less than 10 mL/minute, prescribe a maximum 500 mg once a day.     

[NICE, 2022; EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe amoxicillin to people with
    • A true penicillin hypersensitivity. Allergic reactions to penicillins occur in 1–10% of exposed individuals. Anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of treated patients.
      • Gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin.
    • Hypersensitivity to cephalosporins, carbapenems, or monobactams — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity.
  • Prescribe amoxicillin with caution in people with:
    • Renal impairment — it may be necessary to reduce the dose of amoxicillin. See the section on Dosing regime for more information.
    • Glandular fever (infective mononucleosis) — these people are especially susceptible to amoxicillin-induced skin rashes.
    • Acute or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia — these people are susceptible to amoxicillin-induced skin rashes.

[EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • The most common adverse effects of penicillins include diarrhoea, nausea, and skin rash.
    • Severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with antibiotics may be a sign of pseudomembranous colitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
    • In addition to rash, other skin symptoms include urticaria and pruritus. Very rarely, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis have been reported.
  • Anaphylaxis (immediate or delayed) is a serious but rare adverse effect of amoxicillin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.
  • Other very rare adverse effects include:
    • Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice.
    • Hyperkinesia, dizziness, and convulsions.
    • Interstitial nephritis.
    • Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and haemolytic anaemia.

[EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Allopurinol — be aware that concomitant use of allopurinol and amoxicillin may increase the incidence of skin rashes. Concomitant use need not be avoided for this reason.
  • Anticoagulants (for example warfarin) — monitor the prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) more closely with the addition or withdrawal of a penicillin. Adjustment of the anticoagulant dose may be necessary.
    • Prolongation of INR has been reported in people taking penicillins and warfarin concurrently.
  • Methotrexate — monitor methotrexate levels more closely. One recommendation is to carry out twice weekly platelet and white cell counts for 2 weeks initially, with the measurement of methotrexate levels if toxicity is suspected.
    • Penicillins may reduce the excretion of methotrexate, potentially increasing toxicity. The interaction is not usually serious and risk factors are unknown (even people on low doses of methotrexate have been affected).
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of penicillins.
  • Probenecid — may cause increased and prolonged blood levels of amoxicillin. The manufacturer recommends avoiding concurrent use.
  • Tetracyclines — the bactericidal effects of amoxicillin may be affected by concurrent tetracycline use.

[CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2023a; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Pregnancy

  • Amoxicillin is not known to be harmful in pregnancy [BNF, 2024]. 
    • Penicillins are the antibiotics of choice in pregnancy [Schaefer, 2015]. The UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) states that the majority of a large amount of data shows no increased risk of congenital malformation, spontaneous abortion (miscarriage), intrauterine death, low birth weight, preterm delivery, or neonatal complications when penicillins are taken at therapeutic doses during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2019].  

Breastfeeding

  • Trace amounts of amoxicillin are found in breastmilk, but it is appropriate to use in women who are breastfeeding [BNF, 2024].  
    • Co-amoxiclav use in breastfeeding may cause diarrhoea or fungal infection of mucous membranes in the infant [SPS, 2020a].
    • Penicillins (and cephalosporins) are the antibiotics of choice in women who are breastfeeding [Schaefer, 2015].

Clarithromycin 

Dosing regime

  • The treatment duration for AOM is 5–7 days.
  • In children, prescribe:
    • Child 1 month to 11 years:
      • Body weight under 8 kg: 7.5 mg/kg twice daily.
      • Body weight 8–11 kg: 62.5 mg twice daily.
      • Body weight 12–19 kg: 125 mg twice daily.
      • Body weight 20–29 kg: 187.5 mg twice daily.
      • Body weight 30–40 kg: 250 mg twice daily.
    • Child 12–17 years: 250 mg twice daily, increased if necessary in severe infections to 500 mg twice daily.
  • In children with renal impairment, if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 30 mL/minute/1.73m2:
    • Prescribe half the normal dose of clarithromycin.
    • Avoid Klaricid XL® or clarithromycin M/R preparations.
  • In adults, prescribe 250 mg twice daily, increased in severe infections to 500 mg twice daily.
  • In adults with renal impairment, if the eGFR is less than 30 mL/minute/1.73m2:
    • Prescribe half the normal dose of clarithromycin.
    • Avoid Klaricid XL® or clarithromycin M/R preparations.
  • In adults and children with renal impairment, if eGFR is between 30 and 60 mL/minute/1.73m2:
    • Prescribe the normal dose of immediate release preparations of clarithromycin.
    • Prescribe half the normal dose of Klaricid XL® or clarithromycin M/R preparations.

[NICE, 2022; EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people:
    • Taking drugs that prolong the QT interval (for example, terfenadine, and pimozide) — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, which is a risk factor for Torsades de pointes.
    • With a history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including Torsades de pointes arrhythmias.
    • With severe hepatic failure in combination with renal impairment.
    • With hypokalaemia.
    • With known hypersensitivity to clarithromycin or other macrolide antibiotics.
    • Using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) that are extensively metabolised by CYP3A4 (such as simvastatin) — increased risk of myopathy, including rhabdomyolysis.
    • Using colchicine — risk of colchicine toxicity, particularly in the elderly or those with renal insufficiency.
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution in people with:
    • Moderate to severe renal impairment.
    • Impaired hepatic function — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver. 
    • Conditions which predispose to QT interval prolongation such as electrolyte disturbances (for example, hypomagnesemia).
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate the symptoms.
    • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, or bradycardia (less than 50 beats per minute) — increased risk of QT prolongation.
    • Concomitant medication use including triazolobenzodiazepines (triazolam or midazolam), hypoglycaemic agents (such as sulfonylureas) and/or insulin, and oral anticoagulants — clarithromycin can increase the bioavailability of these medications and result in extended pharmacological effects.

[FDA, 2018; EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhoea are the most common adverse effects of macrolides, but they are mild and less frequent with clarithromycin than with erythromycin.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with clarithromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Anaphylaxis is rarely associated with clarithromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.
  • Hepatotoxicity (including cholestatic jaundice) and rash have rarely been reported following treatment with erythromycin or clarithromycin.
  • Reversible hearing loss (sometimes with tinnitus) can occur after large doses of erythromycin or clarithromycin.
  • Cardiac disorders such as  QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias and palpitations.
  • Other uncommon adverse effects include angioedema, anxiety, candida infection, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, leucopenia, neutropenia, tinnitus and vertigo.
  • Other adverse effects reported rarely or very rarely include pancreatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

[EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — there is an increased risk of hypotension if CCBs, such as verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem are taken concomitantly with clarithromycin, as they are metabolised by CYP3A4. This may also lead to increased levels of clarithromycin.
  • Ciclosporin — clarithromycin can increase ciclosporin levels. If co-administration of these drugs is necessary, ciclosporin levels should be monitored and the dose adjusted accordingly.
  • Colchicine — colchicine toxicity has been reported with concomitant use of clarithromycin so the combination is contraindicated.
  • CYP3A enzyme inducers (rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital) — these may induce the metabolism of clarithromycin, resulting in sub-therapeutic levels.
    • It may be necessary to monitor the levels of these drugs, as CYP3A is inhibited by clarithromycin leading to higher plasma levels of the inducer.
  • Digoxin — clarithromycin increases digoxin levels. Monitor and reduce the digoxin dose if required.
  • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
  • Ergot alkaloids — concomitant administration is contraindicated, due to the risk of acute ergot toxicity.
  • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of clarithromycin.
  • Oral hypoglycaemic drugs (sulfonylureas) and insulin — the concomitant use of clarithromycin and oral hypoglycaemic drugs and/or insulin can result in significant hypoglycaemia. Monitor glucose levels.
  • Statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin) — these are extensively metabolised by CYP3A4. Concomitant administration with clarithromycin increases the plasma levels.
    • Simvastatin — do not prescribe clarithromycin to a person taking simvastatin. If treatment with clarithromycin cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin temporarily.
    • Atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest dose of atorvastatin.
    • Other statins not dependent on cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism (fluvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin) — these drugs should be used with caution in combination with erythromycin and the person should be advised to report any muscle pain, tenderness, weakness or dark coloured urine (signs of myopathy). 
  • Warfarin — clarithromycin increases the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as amiodarone, domperidone, or sotalol) — all macrolides can prolong the QT interval, and concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval is contraindicated.

[BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024; EMC, 2024a]

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Pregnancy

  • The safety of clarithromycin in pregnancy has not been established. Avoid (especially in the first trimester), unless the benefit outweighs the risks [EMC, 2023b; UKTIS, 2020].
    • Erythromycin is considered the macrolide of choice in pregnancy because it has the most documented experience, and is considered to be a safe and effective antibiotic during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020]. For more information, please refer to the prescribing information for Erythromycin.

Breastfeeding

  • Clarithromycin is present in breastmilk in low amounts, and these levels are considered unlikely to affect a breastfed infant [LactMed, 2022a].
  • Although experts have recommended that macrolides should be considered a suitable choice of antibiotic during breastfeeding [Schaefer, 2015], the manufacturer advises that use should be avoided by breastfeeding women unless the potential benefits outweigh the risks [BNF, 2024].
    • Epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants breastfed by maternal macrolide users, especially infants exposed in the first 2 weeks after birth [SPS, 2020b].
    • Infants should be monitored for gastrointestinal disturbances and oral candida infection, although these effects are unlikely to occur [SPS, 2020b].

Co-amoxiclav

Dosing regime

  • The treatment duration for acute otitis media is 5–7 days.
  • Prescribe: 
    • Child 1–11 months: 0.25 mL/kg of 125/31 suspension three times a day.
    • Child 1–5 years: 5 mL of 125/31 suspension three times a day or 0.25 mL/kg of 125/31 suspension three times a day.
    • Child 6–11 years: 5 mL of 250/62 suspension three times a day or 0.15 mL/kg of 250/62 suspension three times a day.
    • Child 12–17 years: 250/125 mg or 500/125 mg three times a day.
  • In children with renal impairment:
    • If the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 10–30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe the normal dose every 12 hours.
    • If the eGFR is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2, use the normal dose recommended for mild to moderate infections every 12 hours.
  • In adults, prescribe one 250/125 strength tablet three times a day; increased in severe infections to one 500/125 strength tablet three times a day.
  • In adults with renal impairment:
    • If the eGFR is 10–30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one 250/125 strength tablet every 12 hours or one 500/125 strength tablet every 12 hours.
    • If the eGFR is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one 250/125 strength tablet every 24 hours or one 500/125 strength tablet every 24 hours.

[NICE, 2022; BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe co-amoxiclav in people with:
    • A true penicillin allergy — allergic reactions to penicillins occur in 1–10% of exposed individuals; anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of treated patients.
      • Gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (for example, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin. See the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for more information.
    • A hypersensitivity to cephalosporins, carbapenems, or monobactams — as there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity. 
    • A history of co-amoxiclav-associated or penicillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe co-amoxiclav with caution in people with:
    • Hepatic impairment – monitor closely.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) — reduce the dose if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 or less.
    • Acute lymphocytic leukaemia, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, cytomegalovirus infection, or glandular fever — increased risk of erythematous rashes.

[EMC, 2023c; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Gastrointestinal — diarrhoea (very common), nausea and vomiting (common), and drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (unknown frequency).
    • Very rarely: antibiotic-associated colitis.
  • Nervous system — headache, dizziness (uncommon), and aseptic meningitis (unknown frequency).
  • Skin — skin rash, urticaria, pruritus (uncommon), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (unknown frequency).
    • Very rarely: erythema multiforme, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.
  • Cardiac disorders — QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias, and palpitations.
  • Other uncommon adverse effects include angioedema, anxiety, Candida infection, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, leucopenia, neutropenia, tinnitus, and vertigo.
  • Other rare or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice.
    • Reversible hearing loss (sometimes with tinnitus) can occur after large doses of erythromycin.
    • Hyperactivity and convulsions.
    • Hypersensitivity reactions (serious and occasionally fatal).  
    • Interstitial nephritis.
    • Linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA).  
    • Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and haemolytic anaemia.
    • Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can cause myocardial infarction). 
  • Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE) are adverse effects of unknown frequency.

[EMC, 2023c; BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024b]

Drug interactions

  • Allopurinol — concomitant use of allopurinol and amoxicillin may increase the incidence of skin rashes.
  • Methotrexate — co-amoxiclav may reduce methotrexate clearance, causing an increased risk of toxicity.
    • Monitor methotrexate levels more closely. One recommendation is to carry out twice weekly platelet and white cell counts for 2 weeks initially, with the measurement of methotrexate levels if toxicity is suspected. 
  • Mycophenolate mofitil — reduction in the level of active metabolite may occur when given with co-amoxiclav.
  • Oral anticoagulants (warfarin and phenindione) — prolongation of international normalised ratio has been reported in people taking penicillins and warfarin concurrently.
    • Monitor the prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) more closely with the addition or withdrawal of a penicillin. Adjustment of the anticoagulant dose may be necessary.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of co-amoxiclav.
  • Probenecid — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of amoxicillin, but not clavulanic acid.

[CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2023c; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Pregnancy

  • Co-amoxiclav is not known to be harmful in pregnancy [BNF, 2024], but the manufacturer advises avoidance unless considered essential [EMC, 2023c].
    • Penicillins are the antibiotics of choice in pregnancy [Schaefer, 2015]. The UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) states that co-amoxiclav use in pregnancy has not been linked with an increased risk of congenital malformation, spontaneous abortion (miscarriage), intrauterine death, low birth weight, preterm delivery, or neonatal complications when penicillins are taken at therapeutic doses during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2019]. 

Breastfeeding

  • Although adverse infant reactions, including restlessness, diarrhoea and rash, have been described following the use of co-amoxiclav in women who are breastfeeding, these events are thought to be uncommon. Use during breastfeeding is therefore considered acceptable [LactMed, 2018]. 
    • Trace amounts of amoxicillin are found in breast milk, but it is appropriate to use in women who are breastfeeding [BNF, 2024].  
    • Use of penicillins in breastfeeding may cause diarrhoea or fungal infection of mucous membranes in the infant [SPS, 2020a].
    • Penicillins (and cephalosporins) are the antibiotics of choice in women who are breastfeeding [Schaefer, 2015].

Erythromycin

Dosing regime

  • The treatment duration for acute otitis media (AOM) is 5–7 days.
  • Prescribe for children:
    • 1 month to 1 year: 125 mg four times a day or 250 mg twice a day.
    • 2 years to 7 years: 250 mg four times a day or 500 mg twice a day.
    • 8 years to 17 years: 250–500 mg four times a day or 500-1000 mg twice a day.
  • In children with severe renal impairment, the dose of erythromycin should be reduced.
  • In adults, prescribe 250–500 mg four times a day.
  • In adults with severe renal impairment, prescribe a maximum daily dose of 1.5 g of erythromycin.

[NICE, 2022; EMC, 2023d; BNF, 2024; BNFC, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe erythromycin to people:
    • With porphyria.
    • A history of QT interval prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia.
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation such as electrolyte disturbances and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval.
    • With known hypersensitivity to erythromycin or other macrolide antibiotics.
    • Using simvastatin, tolterodine, mizolastine, amisulpride, astemizole, terfenadine, domperidone, cisapride, pimozide, ergotamine, or lomitapide.
  • Prescribe erythromycin with caution in people with:
    • Renal impairment.
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — erythromycin is principally excreted by the liver. 
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate the symptoms of people with myasthenia gravis.

[MHRA, 2020; EMC, 2023d; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhoea are the most common adverse effects of macrolides.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops diarrhoea during or after treatment with erythromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated. 
  • Anaphylaxis is rarely associated with erythromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis. 
  • Hepatotoxicity (including cholestatic jaundice) and rash have rarely been reported following treatment with erythromycin or clarithromycin.
  • Reversible hearing loss (sometimes with tinnitus) can occur after large doses of erythromycin or clarithromycin.
  • Cardiac disorders such as  QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias, and palpitations.
  • Other uncommon adverse effects include angioedema, anxiety, Candida infection, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, leucopenia, neutropenia, tinnitus, and vertigo.
  • Other adverse effects reported rarely or very rarely include pancreatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

[EMC, 2023d; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Carbamazepine — erythromycin markedly increases the concentration of carbamazepine. Monitor carbamazepine levels and adjust the dose.
    • Advise the person to report symptoms of carbamazepine toxicity (such as nausea, vomiting, ataxia, or drowsiness).
  • Corticosteroids — levels of corticosteroids may be increased. Monitor for corticosteroid adverse effects (such as moon face, weight gain, and hyperglycaemia), and adjust the corticosteroid dose or stop the macrolide as appropriate. 
  • Drugs that prolong the QT interval — particular care should be taken with these medications. The concurrent use of two or more drugs that prolong the QT interval should be avoided because of the risk of torsade de pointes arrhythmias. Seek advice from a microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
  • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, and short-acting beta2-agonists). Hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation — seek advice from a microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
  • Lomitapide — concurrent use with erythromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
  • Statins (atorvastatin and simvastatin) — these are extensively metabolised by CYP3A4. Concomitant administration with erythromycin increases the plasma levels.
    • Simvastatin — do not prescribe clarithromycin to a person taking simvastatin. If treatment with erythromycin cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin temporarily.
    • Atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with erythromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest dose of atorvastatin.
    • Other statins not dependent on cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism (fluvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin) — these drugs should be used with caution in combination with erythromycin and the person should be advised to report any muscle pain, tenderness, weakness, or dark coloured urine (signs of myopathy). 
  • Theophylline — check theophylline levels 48 hours after starting erythromycin, and adjust the dose of theophylline accordingly.
    • Erythromycin increases plasma concentrations of theophylline, and theophylline may also reduce serum concentrations of erythromycin. 
  • Rivaroxaban — erythromycin may increase levels of rivaroxaban, increasing the risk of bleeding. 
  • Warfarin — the anticoagulant effect of warfarin may be increased by erythromycin. Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — due to an increased risk of adverse effects such as hypotension, caution is advised with the concurrent use of erythromycin and CCBs. Monitor and reduce the dose of CCB if adverse effects occur.
  • Contraceptives — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after a course of clarithromycin or erythromycin.

[MHRA, 2020; CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2023d; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Pregnancy

  • The British National Formulary (BNF) states that specialist sources recommend that erythromycin should only used in pregnancy if the potential benefits outweigh the risks [BNF, 2024].
  • Most studies do not suggest erythromycin use is associated with malformations or other adverse effects on the fetus, but there is an inconclusive association with cardiovascular defects [UKTIS, 2020; EMC, 2023d].
    • The manufacturer reports that animal studies have shown no hazard, and erythromycin has been reported to cross the placental barrier in humans but fetal plasma levels are generally low [EMC, 2023d].
  • Erythromycin is the macrolide of choice because it has more documented experience and is considered to be a safe and effective antibiotic during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020].

Breastfeeding

  • Erythromycin is present in breast milk in low amounts, and these levels are considered unlikely to affect a breastfed infant [LactMed, 2022b].
  • Macrolides are a suitable choice during breastfeeding [Schaefer, 2015], and the BNF advises that erythromycin is not known to be harmful when used by breastfeeding women [BNF, 2024].
    • Epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants breastfed by maternal macrolide users, especially infants exposed in the first 2 weeks after birth — the risk may be greater with erythromycin [SPS, 2020b].
    • Infants should be monitored for gastrointestinal disturbances and oral candida infection, although these effects are unlikely to occur [SPS, 2020b].

Dosing regime

The treatment for children and young people under 18 with acute otitis media is to prescribe:

  • Phenazone 40 mg/g with lidocaine 10 mg/g. Apply 4 drops two or three times a day for up to 7 days, available as Otigo®. 

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2024]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Phenazone and lidocaine ear drops should not be prescribed to children or young people who have:
    • Hypersensitivity to the active substances or any of the excipients, sodium thiosulfate, ethanol, and glycerol.
    • Infectious or traumatic perforation of the tympanic membrane (including myringotomy) — intra-auricular administration may lead to contact with middle ear structures and ototoxicity.
  • Phenazone and lidocaine ear drops should be prescribed with caution to children and young people who:
    • Are susceptible to methemoglobinemia, including infants under 3 months of age.
    • Have haemoglobinopathies.
    • Have Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Ear and labyrinth disorders — Rarely local allergic reactions (itching and maculopapular rash), auditory canal or tympanic membrane hyperaemia can occur.

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2024]

Drug interactions

  • Potential drug interactions with phenazone with lidocaine:
    • Since systemic absorption can occur with topical application of lidocaine and NSAIDs, the possibility of interactions with these medications should be borne in mind. There have been no studies conducted on potential drug interactions. 

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2024]

Pregnancy and breastfeeding

  • The BNF advises that these drops should be used with caution in pregnancy and in women who are breastfeeding. They advise that systemic absorption is unlikely with an intact tympanic membrane.
  • The manufacturer's summary of product characteristics advises that if the recommended dosage (4 drops two or three times daily) and therapy duration (should not exceed 7 days) are observed, the product can be administered during pregnancy and breastfeeding, if necessary.
  • It is not known if phenazone and lidocaine pass into breast milk or/and cross the placenta.

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2024]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2022], a US guideline The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media [Lieberthal, 2013], a Canadian position statement Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older [Le Saux, 2016], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children [Venekamp, 2023], Paracetamol (acetaminophen) or non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, alone or combined, for pain relief in acute otitis media in children [de Sévaux, 2023], and expert opinion published in narrative reviews [Atkinson, 2015; Schilder, 2016; Gaddey, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.

  • For a more detailed discussion of the basis for the NICE recommendations, see the NICE evidence review.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of acute otitis media, with additional searches in the following areas:

  • complications of recurrent acute otitis media

Search dates

July 2018 - January 2024

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCO Medline.

  • (MH "Otitis Media+") 
  • AB otitis media OR TI otitis media  

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • Atkinson, H., Wallis, S. and Coatesworth, A.P. (2015) Acute otitis media. Postgraduate medicine 127(4), 386-390. [Abstract]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2023) Acute otitis media. BMJ Publishing Group. https://bestpractice.bmj.com
  • BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • BNFC (2024) British National Formulary for Children. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
  • CoSRH (2022) Drug interactions with hormonal contraception. The College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. https://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
  • Cushen, R. and Francis, N.A. (2020) Antibiotic use and serious complications following acute otitis media and acute sinusitis: a retrospective cohort study. British Journal of General Practice 70(693), e255-e263. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • de Lusignan, S., Correa, A., Pathirannehelage, S. et al. (2017) RCGP research and surveillance centre annual report 2014-2015: disparities in presentations to primary care. British Journal of General Practice 67(654), e29-e40. [Free Full-text]
  • de Sévaux, J.L.H., Damoiseaux, R.A., van de Pol, A.C., et al. (2023) Cochrane Review: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or combined, for pain relief in acute otitis media in children. Issue 8. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2020) SPC for Otigo 40 mg/10 mg/g ear drops, solution. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023a) SPC for Amoxicillin 250 mg Capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023b) SPC for Clarithromycin 250mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023c) SPC for Augmentin 375mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023d) SPC for erythromycin 250 mg gastro-resistant tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024a) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg/5 ml granules for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
  • EMC (2024b) SPC for augmentin 625 mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • FDA (2018) FDA drug safety communication: FDA review finds additional data supports the potential for increased long-term risks with antibiotic clarithromycin (Biaxin) in patients with heart disease. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov [Free Full-text]
  • Finnikin, S. and Mitchell-Innes, A. (2016) Recurrent otalgia in adults. BMJ 354, i3917. [Abstract]
  • Foxlee, R., Johansson, A., Wejfalk, J., et al. (2006) Cochrane Review: Topical analgesia for acute otitis media. Issue 3. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Gaddey, H.L., Wright, M.T. and Nelson, T.N. (2019) Otitis Media: Rapid Evidence Review. American Family Physician 100(6), 350-356. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Granath, A (2017) Recurrent acute otitis media: What are the options for treatment and prevention? Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports 5(2), 93-100. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Hay, A.D., Downing, H., Francis, N.A., et al. (2019) Anaesthetic-analgesic ear drops to reduce antibiotic consumption in children with acute otitis media: the CEDAR RCT. Health Technology Assessments 23(34), 1-48. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Heidemann, C.H., Lous, J., Berg, J. et al. (2016) Danish guidelines on management of otitis media in preschool children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 87, 154-163. [Abstract]
  • Kaur, R., Morris, M. and Pichichero, M.E. (2017) Epidemiology of acute otitis media in the postpneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Pediatrics 140(3), e20170181. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Kozyrskyj, A.L., Klassen, T.P., Moffatt, M. and Harvey, K. (2010) Short-course antibiotics for acute otitis media (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • LactMed (2018) Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • LactMed (2022a) Clarithromycin. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • LactMed (2022b) Erythromycin. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • Le Saux, N., Robinson, J.L. and Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee (2016) Management of acute otitis media in children six months of age and older. Paediatrics and Child Health 21(1), 39-50. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Leach, A.J. and Morris, P.S. (2006) Antibiotics for the prevention of acute and chronic suppurative otitis media in children (Cochrane Review). Issue 2. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Lieberthal, A., Carroll, A., Chonmaitree, T., et al. (2013) The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 131(3), e964-e999. [Abstract]
  • MHRA (2020) Erythromycin: caution required due to cardiac risks (QT interval prolongation); drug interaction with rivaroxaban. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Monasta, L., Ronfani, L., Marchetti, F., et al. (2012) Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PLoS One 7(4), e36226. [Abstract]
  • Ngo, C.C., Massa, H.M., Thornton, R.B. and Cripps, A.W. (2016) Predominant bacteria detected from the middle ear fluid of children experiencing otitis media: a systematic review. PLoS One 11(3), e0150949. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2019) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children and young people: diagnosis and management [NG1]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021) Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2022) Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2023) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Phillips, J.S., Yung, M.W., Burton, M.J. and Swan, I.R. (2007) Evidence review and ENT-UK consensus report for the use of aminoglycoside-containing ear drops in the presence of an open middle ear. Clinical Otolaryngology 32(5), 330-336. [Abstract]
  • Powers,J.H. (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of acute otitis media: evaluating the evidence. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 21(2), 409-426. [Abstract]
  • PrescQIPP (2020) Bulletin 265: NSAIDs (version 2.0). PrescQIPP C.I.C. PrescQIPP C.I.C. https://www.prescqipp.info [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C.L (2024) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
  • Rosa-Olivares, J., Porro, A., Rodriguez-Varela, M., et al. (2015) Otitis media: to treat, to refer, to do nothing: a review for the practitioner. Pediatrics in Review 36(11), 480-486. [Abstract]
  • Rosenfeld, R., Schwartz, S., Pynnonen, M., et al. (2013) Clinical practice guideline: Tympanostomy tubes in children. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 149(Suppl. 1), S1-S35. [Abstract]
  • Rothman, R., Owens, T. and Simel, D.L. (2003) Does this child have acute otitis media? Journal of the American Medical Association 290(12), 1633-1640. [Free Full-text]
  • Rovers, M.M., Glasziou, P., Appelman, C.L., et al. (2006) Antibiotics for acute otitis media: a meta-analysis with individual patient data. Lancet 368(9545), 1429-1435. [Abstract]
  • Schaefer, C., Peters, P. and Miller, R. (Eds.) (2015) Drugs during pregnancy and lactation: treatment options and risk assessment. 3rd edn. London: Academic Press.
  • Schilder, A.G., Chonmaitree, T., Cripps, A.W., et al. (2016) Otitis media. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 2, 16063. [Abstract]
  • Shah, U.K. (2003) Acute otitis media/otitis media with effusion in craniofacial syndromes. In: Alper, C., Bluestone, C., Casselbrant, M., et al. (Eds.) Advanced therapy of otitis media. London: B.C. Decker, 468-473.
  • Simo, R., Robinson, M., Lei, M., et al. (2016) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 130(S2), S97-S103. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • SPS (2020a) Safety in lactation: penicillins. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • SPS (2020b) Safety in lactation: Macrolides. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Tsunoda, A., Suzuki, M., Kishimoto, S., et al. (2021) Otitis Media With Effusion Caused by a Parapharyngeal Tumor Showing Normal Nasopharyngeal Findings. Ear Nose and Throat Journal 100(7), 543-545. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • UKTIS (2019) Use of penicillins in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • UKTIS (2020) Use of macrolides in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • Venekamp, R.P., Sanders, S.L., Glasziou, P.P. and Rovers, M.M. (2023) Cochrane Review - Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Issue 11. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
Change privacy settings