Skin and nail
Impetigo
Last revised in July 2024
Impetigo is a common contagious pyogenic infection of the superficial layers of the skin, usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Impetigo: Summary
- Impetigo is a common, superficial, and highly contagious bacterial skin infection.
- There are two main types of impetigo: non-bullous and bullous.
- Non-bullous impetigo (70% of cases) is caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, or a combination of both.
- Bullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus.
- Impetigo caused by Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is becoming increasingly common.
- Impetigo affects all age groups but is most common in young children.
- Risk factors include:
- Conditions that lead to breaks in the skin, such as cuts, burns, insect bites, eczema, or contact dermatitis.
- Warm/humid weather.
- Poor hygiene.
- Crowded environments.
- Impetigo is usually a self-limiting condition.
- Without treatment, the infection heals in 7–21 days. However, appropriate antibiotic treatment may lead to quicker resolution of infection and a reduced infective period.
- Complications (such as glomerulonephritis and cellulitis) are rare but can occur in some cases, such as in neonates and people with severe immunosuppression.
- Diagnosis of impetigo is usually clinical.
- Non-bullous impetigo is characterized by thin-walled vesicles or pustules that rupture quickly, forming golden-brown crusts. The most commonly affected sites are the face (especially around the nose and mouth), limbs, and flexures (especially the axillae).
- Bullous impetigo is characterized by large, fragile, flaccid bullae (fluid-filled lesions) that rupture and ooze yellow fluid, leaving a scaley rim (collarette). The most commonly affected sites are the flexures, face, trunk, and limbs.
- Differential diagnoses, such as chicken pox, eczema, and cellulitis, should be excluded.
- Swabs for culture and sensitivities should be considered if impetigo is persistent, recurrent, or widespread.
- Management of impetigo includes:
- Advising the person on hygiene measures to aid healing and stop the spread of the infection.
- Advising on the exclusion recommendations for people with impetigo: they should not attend a setting (such as school, other childcare facilities, or work) until all lesions (sores or blisters) are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after commencing treatment (hydrogen peroxide cream or antibiotics).
- Ensuring pre-existing skin conditions (such as eczema) are optimally treated.
- Treating with a short course of hydrogen peroxide 1% cream, a topical antibiotic (fusidic acid 2% or mupirocin 2% [if fusidic acid resistance is suspected or confirmed]), or an oral antibiotic, depending on the type and extent of the infection.
- Reassessing the person if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or have not improved after completing a course of treatment.
- The need for admission, referral, or specialist advice should be considered. For example:
- If sepsis is suspected, hospital admission is indicated.
- If the person is immunosuppressed and the infection is widespread, hospital referral is indicated (with urgency, depending on clinical judgement).
- If MRSA is suspected, a local microbiologist should be consulted.
Have I got the right topic?
From birth onwards.
This CKS topic covers the management of impetigo.
This CKS topic does not cover the management of infected wounds or burns, infected eczema, or cellulitis.
There are separate CKS topics on Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage, Candida - skin, Cellulitis - acute, Dermatitis - contact, Eczema - atopic, Fungal skin infection - body and groin, and Fungal skin infection - scalp.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
July 2024 — minor update. Prescribing section on hydrogen peroxide changed from 2% to 1% cream.
Previous changes
May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contra-indicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.
February 2024 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in December 2023 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made, but the topic has been restructured.
November 2023 — minor update. The drug interaction section for flucloxacillin has been updated in line with the updated manufacturer's summary of product characteristics (SPC).
August 2023 — minor update. The recommendation that children and adults should stay away from school and other childcare facilities or work until lesions are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after initiating antibiotic treatment has been updated to include treatment with hydrogen peroxide cream.
July 2023 — minor update. The SPC for clarithromycin has been updated to include a warning regarding concurrent treatment with domperidone (due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias). A minor typographical error has been corrected.
August 2022 – minor update. A minor typographical error has been corrected.
February 2020 – minor update. The treatment recommendations section has been updated in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing.
September 2018 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in July 2018 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of this topic. Changes to recommendations include a change in the duration of treatment of mild localized impetigo with fusidic acid from 7 to 5 days based on recommendations by Public Health England (PHE) to reduce the risk of bacterial resistance.
December 2016 — minor update. The dose of clarithromycin for people with severe renal impairment has been clarified, in line with the manufacturer's SPC.
July 2015 — minor updates. The text regarding the basis for prescribing oral erythromycin as an option if there is a history of penicillin allergy has been amended to remove the relative cost of erythromycin compared with clarithromycin. The information on the concurrent use of clarithromycin or erythromycin with statins has been clarified.
July 2014 — minor update. The text was changed in the prescribing information section to reflect the manufacturer's recommendation that topical fusidic acid can be used during pregnancy. It can also be used during breastfeeding but should not be applied to the breast.
July 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in June 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.
February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
August 2010 — minor update. The Health Protection Agency (HPA) advises that children (and adults) should stay away from school (or work) until the lesions have scabbed over or for 48 hours after starting antibiotic treatment.
December 2008 to June 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. Retapamulin has been included as a second-line treatment for localized areas of impetigo.
December 2008 — minor update. Clarithromycin has been added as an antibiotic option if a person is penicillin allergic.
September 2008 — minor correction to the Changes section.
October to December 2005 — reviewed. Validated in March 2006 and issued in May 2006.
September 2002 — written. Validated in October 2002 and issued in December 2002.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 January 2024.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 January 2024.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 January 2024.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analyses which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 January 2024.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 January 2024.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 January 2024.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 January 2024.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 January 2024.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Recognize the clinical features of non-bullous and bullous impetigo.
- Assess people with impetigo.
- Treat people with impetigo.
- Identify people with impetigo who require admission, referral, or specialist advice.
- Provide appropriate information and advice to people with impetigo and/or their parents/carers.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.
NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.Background information
What is it?
- Impetigo is a common, superficial bacterial skin infection.
- There are two main types of impetigo:
- Non-bullous — accounts for about 70% of cases.
- Bullous — skin eruption is characterized by bullae (fluid-filled lesions over 1 cm in diameter).
- Impetigo can be further classified as:
- Primary — direct bacterial invasion of otherwise healthy, intact skin.
- Secondary — bacterial infection through a break in the skin, for example, from trauma (such as a cut, burn, or insect bite) or an underlying skin condition (such as eczema or scabies).
- There are two main types of impetigo:
- Impetigo is highly contagious.
- It is most commonly spread through direct contact with an infected person, including contact with drainage from impetigo lesions.
- Autoinoculation via fingers or contaminated objects (such as toys, towels, or clothing) often leads to satellite lesions in adjacent areas.
- The incubation period, from skin colonization to the development of the characteristic lesions, is 4–10 days.
[BMJ Best Practice, 2020; NICE, 2020; CDC, 2022; PCDS, 2022a; UKHSA, 2023a]
What causes it?
- Impetigo is mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Group A beta-haemolytic Streptococcus pyogenes.
- Non-bullous impetigo is caused by S. aureus (80% of cases), S. pyogenes (10% of cases), or both (10% of cases). Disruption in skin integrity allows for bacterial invasion via the interrupted surface.
- Bullous impetigo is almost always caused by S. aureus. Bullae (fluid-filled lesions) form when exfoliative toxins produced by S. aureus cause loss of cell adhesion in the superficial epidermis by targeting intracellular adhesion molecules (desmoglein – 1) in the epidermal granular layer. Bullous impetigo can affect intact skin.
- Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be a causative organism and is seen more often in cases of non-bullous impetigo.
- Risk factors for impetigo include:
- Conditions that lead to breaks in the skin, such as cuts, burns, insect bites, eczema, or contact dermatitis.
- Warm/humid weather.
- Poor hygiene.
- Crowded and impoverished environments.
- Comorbidities that predispose to immunosuppression, such as diabetes and malnutrition.
- Contact with a person with impetigo.
How common is it?
- Impetigo is a common condition.
- It affects all age groups but is most common in young children.
- A retrospective study found the weekly rates of impetigo in England and Wales to be highest in children aged 0–4 years (84 per 100,000) and children aged 5–14 years (54 per 100,000). The incidence rate decreased with increasing age and was lowest for people aged over 65 years (3.6 per 100,000) [Elliot, 2006].
- A systematic review of global prevalence found that impetigo affects more than 162 million children worldwide at any one time, predominantly in tropical areas and underprivileged communities [Bowen, 2015].
- Non-bullous impetigo (approximately 70% of cases) is most common in children aged 2–5 years [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].
- Bullous impetigo is reported most often in children aged under 2 years [PCDS, 2022a].
- Impetigo can affect people of all races.
- Males and females are affected equally, except in adults, where male involvement predominates [PCDS, 2022a].
- It affects all age groups but is most common in young children.
What is the prognosis?
- Impetigo is usually a self-limiting condition.
- Without treatment, the infection heals in 7–21 days [Hoffmann, 2021; Quirke, 2022]. However, appropriate treatment may limit the spread of infection, the worsening of symptoms, and hasten recovery [NICE, 2020; Quirke, 2022].
- Relapse occurs most often in people with ongoing risk factors, such as an underlying skin condition (such as eczema), and in staphylococcal carriers.
- Complications are rare but can occur in some cases, such as neonates and people with severe immunosuppression [BMJ Best Practice, 2020].
What are the complications?
- Complications of impetigo are uncommon and include:
- Cellulitis.
- Ecthyma (a deep form of impetigo causing deeper skin erosions into the dermis).
- Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome.
- Lymphangitis.
- Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis.
- Septicaemia and sepsis.
- Scaring.
- Scarlet fever, urticaria, and erythema multiforme (following streptococcal infection).
- Acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (occurs 1–2 weeks after the infection resolves).
[Hartman-Adams, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; CDC, 2022; PCDS, 2022a; Quirke, 2022]
Diagnosis of impetigo
How should I diagnose impetigo?
- Take a history. Ask about:
- The presenting symptoms including onset, duration, and location of lesions.
- Recent trauma to the skin, for example, a bite, burn, or laceration.
- Underlying comorbidities that predispose to infection, such as a skin condition (such as eczema) or diabetes mellitus.
- Other risk factors for impetigo, for example, recent contact with a person with impetigo.
- Previous treatment, including antimicrobial treatment.
- Systemic features, such as fever.
- Examine the person. Look for:
- Signs of impetigo, such as golden-brown crusts or bullae (fluid-filled lesions over 1 cm in diameter).
- Features of systemic involvement, such as lymphadenopathy or fever.
- Signs of conditions that may present similarly to impetigo, such as scabies and contact dermatitis.
- Signs of complications, such as cellulitis or ecthyma (a deep tissue form of impetigo).
- Diagnose impetigo in people with characteristic symptoms and signs.
- Non-bullous impetigo is characterized by thin-walled vesicles or pustules that rupture quickly, forming golden-brown crusts.
- It starts as maculopapular lesions, which evolve into vesicles or pustules that rupture easily and are seldom seen on clinical examination. The exudate dries to form golden-brown crusts, which are thicker in streptococcal infections.
- The most commonly affected sites are the face (especially around the nose and mouth), limbs, and flexures (especially the axillae). Satellite lesions may develop following autoinoculation. Mucosal involvement is uncommon.
- Lesions are usually asymptomatic, with occasional pruritus. There is minimal or no surrounding erythema.
- Regional adenopathy is common.
- Systemic symptoms, such as fever, are typically absent.
- Bullous impetigo is characterized by large, fragile, flaccid bullae (fluid-filled lesions over 1 cm in diameter) that rupture and ooze yellow fluid, leaving a scaley rim (collarette).
- It starts as small vesicles, which evolve into flaccid bullae. The characteristic collarette of scales develops after the bullae rupture, leaving a thin, brown crust on the remaining erosions.
- The most commonly affected sites are the flexures, face, trunk, and limbs. Lesions can spread distally due to autoinoculation. The buccal mucosa may be involved.
- Regional lymphadenopathy is rare.
- Systemic symptoms (such as fever, lymphadenopathy, diarrhoea, and weakness) may occur if large areas of skin are affected.
- Non-bullous impetigo is characterized by thin-walled vesicles or pustules that rupture quickly, forming golden-brown crusts.
- Impetigo is usually a clinical diagnosis, and investigations are not routinely needed.
- Consider swabs (of exudate from a moist lesion or de-roofed blister) for culture and sensitivities if:
- The person fails to respond to appropriate empirical treatment.
- Impetigo is recurrent or widespread.
- There is doubt about the diagnosis.
- Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected (for example, if a spontaneous abscess or cellulitis develops or impetigo is persistent or recurrent).
- Consider swabs (of exudate from a moist lesion or de-roofed blister) for culture and sensitivities if:
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Impetigo [PCDS, 2022a], the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guideline Impetigo [CDC, 2022], and on expert opinion in review articles Impetigo [BMJ Best Practice, 2020] and Impetigo [Quirke, 2022].
- Expert opinion in the PCDS guideline is that [PCDS, 2022a]:
- Impetigo is usually diagnosed based on the clinical appearance.
- Poorly responsive or recurrent cases of impetigo should be swabbed for culture and sensitivity to identify possible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Swabs are best taken from a moist lesion or, in cases of bullous impetigo, from a de-roofed blister.
- Expert opinion in the CDC guideline is that [CDC, 2022]:
- Impetigo is diagnosed by physical examination, but physical examination cannot reliably differentiate between streptococcal and staphylococcal non-bullous impetigo.
- Gram stain or culture of the exudate or pus from an impetigo lesion can identify the bacterial cause; however, laboratory testing is not necessary or routinely performed in clinical practice.
What else might it be?
- Differential diagnoses of impetigo include:
- Bacterial skin infections, such as:
- Erysipelas — sharply demarcated erythematous plaques, typically unilateral and on the face. Oedema and warmth are common features.
- Staphylococcal scaled skin syndrome — an uncommon, superficial, blistering skin condition characterized by widespread erythema and exfoliation.
- Necrotizing fasciitis — a destructive and rapidly progressive soft tissue infection involving deep subcutaneous tissues, fascia, and occasionally muscles. The presenting signs are usually non-specific (redness, swelling, and pyrexia). The person is usually systemically very unwell and has disproportionate pain.
- Cellulitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute.
- Fungal skin infections, such as:
- Candidiasis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Candida - skin.
- Tinea corporis. For more information, see the CKS topics on Fungal skin infection - body and groin and Fungal skin infection - foot.
- Tinea capitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Fungal skin infection - scalp.
- Parasitic infestations, such as scabies. For more information, see the CKS topic on Scabies.
- Viral infections, such as:
- Chickenpox. For more information, see the CKS topic on Chickenpox.
- Herpes simplex. For more information, see the CKS topics on Herpes simplex - genital and Herpes simplex - oral.
- Non-infective skin conditions, such as:
- Drug reaction — characterized by itching and burning. There is usually a well-demarcated area of involvement and a history of similar reactions with prior exposure to the same drug. For more information, see the CKS topic on Adverse drug reactions.
- Atopic or contact dermatitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Dermatitis - contact .
- Eczema. For more information, see the CKS topic on Eczema - atopic.
- Insect bites. For more information, see the CKS topic on Insect bites and stings.
- Burns and scalds. For more information, see the CKS topic on Burns and scalds.
- Other skin disorders, such as pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, lupus erythematosus, erythema multiforme, and Sweets Syndrome.
- Bacterial skin infections, such as:
Basis for recommendation
- The information on the differential diagnoses of impetigo is based on expert opinion in review articles Impetigo: diagnosis and treatment [Hartman-Adams, 2014], Common skin rashes in children [Allmon, 2015], Impetigo [BMJ Best Practice, 2020], and Impetigo [Quirke, 2022].
- The information on the clinical features of Staphylococcal Scalded Skin syndrome is based on expert opinion in the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome (syn. Ritter disease; staphylococcal epidermal necrolysis) [PCDS, 2022b].
Management
Scenario: Non-bullous impetigo
From birth onwards.
When should I refer a person with non-bullous impetigo?
- Refer the person to hospital (the urgency depending on clinical judgement) if:
- A serious complication of impetigo is suspected, such as a deep soft tissue infection or sepsis. See the CKS topic on Sepsis for more information.
- The person is immunosuppressed, and the infection is widespread.
- Consider referral or seek specialist advice (urgency depending on clinical judgement) if:
- The person is systemically unwell.
- Impetigo recurs frequently.
- The person is at high risk of complications.
- The diagnosis is uncertain, and differential diagnoses have been considered.
- Consult a local microbiologist if:
- Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected. For more information, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020] and on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- Referral is usually not necessary for people with impetigo. However, urgent assessment and consideration of parenteral antibiotics may be required in severe or complicated cases.
- Based on its experience, the NICE committee agreed that [NICE, 2020]:
- People who may have a more serious illness or condition or are immunocompromised with widespread impetigo need further assessment and treatment in hospital.
- Referral or specialist advice should be an option for people with difficult-to-treat impetigo (for example, bullous impetigo or impetigo that recurs frequently).
How should I manage a person with non-bullous impetigo?
If admission or referral is not indicated:
- Advise on:
- The usual course of impetigo.
- Impetigo is usually a self-limiting condition.
- Without treatment, the infection heals in 7–21 days. However, appropriate treatment may lead to quicker resolution of infection and a reduced infective period.
- Impetigo usually heals completely without scarring, and complications are rare.
- What to do if symptoms worsen rapidly at any time, or do not improve after completing a course of treatment.
- Patient information leaflets on impetigo are available from the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and the NHS website.
- Hygiene measures to aid healing and reduce the spread of impetigo. They should:
- Wash affected areas with soap and water.
- Avoid touching or scratching patches of impetigo.
- Wash hands regularly, including after touching affected areas.
- Cover affected areas where possible.
- Not share towels, facecloths, and other personal care products.
- Clean equipment, including toys and play equipment, daily.
- Wash clothing and bedding on the hottest available setting (at least 60 degrees). Clothing and bedding should be washed and changed daily during the first few days of treatment.
- Exclusion recommendations for people with impetigo.
- People with impetigo should not attend a setting (such as school, other childcare facilities, or work) until all lesions (sores or blisters) are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after commencing treatment (hydrogen peroxide cream or antibiotics).
- Food handlers are required by law to inform employers immediately if they have a disease likely to be transmitted (through food or afflicted), for example, infected wounds, skin infections, or sores.
- The usual course of impetigo.
- Ensure optimal treatment of pre-existing skin conditions, such as eczema, head lice, scabies, or insect bites.
- For more information, see the CKS topics on Eczema - atopic, Head lice, Insect bites and stings, and Scabies.
- If the person has localized non-bullous impetigo and is not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications:
- Consider offering hydrogen peroxide 1% cream (to be applied two to three times daily for 5 days).
- If hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is unsuitable, offer topical fusidic acid 2% (to be applied three times daily for 5 days).
- If fusidic acid resistance is suspected or confirmed, offer topical mupirocin 2% (to be applied three times daily for 5 days).
- Reassess the person if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or do not improve after completing the course of treatment.
- Consider offering hydrogen peroxide 1% cream (to be applied two to three times daily for 5 days).
- If the person has widespread non-bullous impetigo and is not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications:
- Offer one of the following:
- Topical fusidic acid 2% (to be applied three times daily for 5 days) — if fusidic acid resistance is suspected or confirmed, offer topical mupirocin 2% (to be applied three times daily for 5 days).
- An oral antibiotic.
- Take into account:
- That topical and oral antibiotics are both effective at treating impetigo.
- The preferences of the person and/or their parents/carers, including the practicalities of administration (particularly to large areas) and possible adverse effects.
- Previous use of topical antibiotics (because antimicrobial resistance can develop rapidly with extended or repeated use).
- Do not offer combination treatment with a topical and oral antibiotic.
- Reassess the person if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or do not improve after completing the course of treatment.
- Offer one of the following:
- If the person has localized or widespread non-bullous impetigo and is systemically unwell or at high risk of complications:
- Offer a short course of an oral antibiotic.
- Reassess the person if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or do not improve after completing the course of treatment.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], which is largely based on evidence from the Cochrane systematic review Interventions for Impetigo [Koning, 2012]; the systematic review Natural history of non-bullous impetigo: a systematic review of time to resolution or improvement without antibiotic treatment [Hoffmann, 2021]; the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Impetigo [PCDS, 2022a]; the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) guideline Managing specific infectious diseases: A to Z [UKHSA, 2023b]; and expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Quirke, 2022].
Advice on the usual course of impetigo
- Expert opinion in a systematic review is that discussions with people with impetigo should include the expected course of untreated impetigo [Hoffmann, 2021].
- For more information on the course of impetigo, see the section on Prognosis.
Advice on hygiene measures
- The NICE guideline committee advises, based on its experience, that good hygiene measures help reduce the spread of impetigo, both to other areas of the body and to other people [NICE, 2020].
- The recommended hygiene measures are based on expert opinion in the PCDS and UKHSA guidelines [PCDS, 2022a; UKHSA, 2023b] and in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Quirke, 2022].
Advice on exclusion recommendations
- The recommendation that people with impetigo should not attend a setting until all lesions are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after commencing treatment is based on the UKHSA guideline [UKHSA, 2023b].
- Scab formation, indicating healing, usually occurs within two days of starting antibiotic treatment. After consultation with expert reviewers, CKS infers that the term 'crusting' in the context refers to the scabs that form during the healing process (eschar) rather than the initial gold-crusted plaques typically seen at presentation.
- The recommendation that food handlers are required by law to inform employers immediately if they have a disease likely to be transmitted through food or afflicted is based on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) guideline Food Handlers: Fitness to Work. According to the FSA [FSA, 2009], which states that:
- The law requires that in all food businesses other than those engaged in primary production (for example, farmers and growers) and associated operations:
- No person suffering from, or being a carrier of, a disease likely to be transmitted through food or afflicted, for example, with infected wounds, skin infections, sores, or diarrhoea, is to be permitted to handle food or enter any food-handling area in any capacity if there is any likelihood of direct or indirect contamination.
- Any person so affected and employed in a food business and who is likely to come into contact with food is to report immediately the illness or symptoms and, if possible, their causes to their manager or supervisor.
- The law requires that in all food businesses other than those engaged in primary production (for example, farmers and growers) and associated operations:
Initial treatment
- Evidence identified by NICE showed that impetigo was cured or improved with a placebo in some people. However, given that impetigo is highly infectious, the NICE committee agreed that treatment is important to limit the spread of infection, limit the worsening of symptoms, and hasten recovery [NICE, 2020].
- It was unclear in the evidence reviewed if impetigo was localized or widespread. However, the NICE committee agreed that different treatment options are appropriate for impetigo based on the type and extent of the infection. It agreed that clinical judgement should be used to determine whether impetigo is localized or widespread.
- A systematic review (n = 557) assessed the time to resolution or improvement of non-bullous impetigo without antibiotic treatment [Hoffmann, 2021].
- At about seven days, the percentage of participants classified as 'resolved' ranged from 13–74% across the studies, and the percentage classified as ‘failure to improve’ ranged from 16–41%. The rate of adverse effects was low. Incomplete reporting of some details limited assessment of risk of bias.
- The authors of the systematic review concluded that although some uncertainty remains around the natural history of non-bullous impetigo, symptoms resolve in some people by about seven days without using antibiotics, with about 25% of people not improving. Therefore, immediate antibiotic use may not be mandatory, and discussions with the person should include the expected course of untreated impetigo and careful consideration of the benefits and harms of antibiotic use.
Treating localized non-bullous impetigo
- Evidence identified by NICE suggested that hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is as effective as a topical antibiotic for treating impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- Based on its experience, the NICE committee agreed that the risk of adverse effects from hydrogen peroxide 1%, such as irritation and skin bleaching, is minimal. It also agreed that the significance of this is especially low when compared with the risk of adverse effects associated with topical antibiotics, such as rapid development of antimicrobial resistance.
- The committee agreed that the long-term benefits of good antimicrobial stewardship plus the low risk of adverse effects of hydrogen peroxide 1% compared with a topical antibiotic outweighed the additional cost of hydrogen peroxide 1% cream.
- The committee noted that some other topical antiseptics are licensed for superficial skin infections, which may be cheaper and more widely available. However, no evidence was identified for treating impetigo with other topical antiseptics, so the committee could not make a recommendation for their use.
- NICE recommends a topical antibiotic if hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is unsuitable [NICE, 2020].
- The committee agreed that the likely increased risk of resistance with topical antibiotics applied to a localized area of impetigo for a short duration was outweighed by the increased risk of adverse events with oral antibiotics. Therefore, if hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is unsuitable, for example, because impetigo is around the eyes, a topical antibiotic should be offered for people who are not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications.
Treating widespread non-bullous impetigo
- NICE recommends, based on experience, that people with widespread non-bullous impetigo should be offered a short course of either a topical or an oral antibiotic [NICE, 2020].
- The committee discussed that the choice of topical or oral use would be an individualized clinical decision, considering resistance data, patient preference, practicalities of administration, possible adverse effects, and previous use.
- It discussed that effectively applying a cream may be difficult over larger skin areas. Therefore, an oral antibiotic may be a better option for some people, despite the higher risk of adverse effects. The decision should be based on a discussion of the person's preferences and the balance of risks and benefits.
- The committee agreed that repeated doses or extended use of the same topical antibiotic should be avoided due to the risk of antimicrobial resistance, which can develop rapidly with topical antibiotics.
Treating people who are systemically unwell or at high risk of complications
- NICE did not identify any evidence for treating people who are systemically unwell or at higher risk of complications [NICE, 2020].
- Based on its experience of current practice and considering the high risk of harm if topical application of antibiotics is inadequate, the committee agreed that people who are systemically unwell or at high risk of complications (such as those with are immunocompromised or have coexisting skin conditions) should be offered an oral antibiotic.
- Based on evidence suggesting that combination treatment with an oral and topical antibiotic is no more effective than a topical antibiotic alone and considering the increased risk of adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance with combination treatment, the NICE committee agreed that combination treatment should be discouraged.
Choice of topical antibiotic
- Evidence identified by NICE showed that fusidic acid is as effective as other topical antibiotics and is associated with fewer adverse effects [NICE, 2020].
- Based on the evidence, current practice, and experience, the NICE committee recommends fusidic acid 2% as the first-choice topical antibiotic in adults, young people, and children with non-bullous impetigo when hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is unsuitable (including when impetigo is widespread).
- Based on its experience, the committee agreed that fusidic acid resistance rates are higher than for some other antibiotics. However, the evidence showed fewer skin reactions with fusidic acid compared with mupirocin.
- NICE recommends topical mupirocin 2% if fusidic acid resistance is suspected or confirmed [NICE, 2020].
- The committee based this recommendation on its experience and knowledge of current practice, evidence that mupirocin is as effective as other topical antibiotics for treating impetigo, and its experience that mupirocin resistance rates are low.
Which antibiotic should I prescribe?
If an oral antibiotic is indicated for non-bullous impetigo, prescribe as follows. A 5-day treatment course is usually appropriate but can be increased to 7 days based on clinical judgement, depending on the severity and number of lesions.
For adults aged 18 years and over:
- Prescribe flucloxacillin 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If the person is allergic to penicillin or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable (for people who are not pregnant):
- Prescribe clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily for 5 days. For severe infections, the dosage can be increased to 500 mg twice daily.
- If the person is pregnant and allergic to penicillin:
- Prescribe erythromycin 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected or confirmed:
- Consult a local microbiologist.
For children and young people under 18 years:
- Prescribe flucloxacillin (oral solution or capsules):
- Age 1 month to 1 year — 62.5 mg to 125 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- Age 2–9 years — 125 mg to 250 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- Age 10 –17 years — 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If the child or young person is allergic to penicillin or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable (for example, if an oral solution is unpalatable and the child is unable to swallow capsules), prescribe clarithromycin.
- Age 1 month to 11 years:
- Under 8 kg — 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days.
- 8–11 kg — 62.5 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 12–19 kg — 125 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 20–29 kg — 187.5 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 30–40 kg — 250 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- Ages 12–17 years — 250 mg twice daily for 5 days. For severe infections, the dosage can be increased to 500 mg twice daily.
- Age 1 month to 11 years:
- If the person is pregnant and allergic to penicillin:
- Ages 8-17 years — prescribe erythromycin 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If MRSA is suspected or confirmed, consult a local microbiologist.
For information on contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see the section on Prescribing information.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], which is largely based on evidence from the Cochrane systematic review Interventions for Impetigo [Koning, 2012].
Antibiotic choices
- NICE reviewed the evidence on antibiotic treatment in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- Based on its experience and knowledge of current practice, the committee agreed that flucloxacillin (a relatively narrow-spectrum penicillin effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes) should be the first-choice oral antibiotic in adults, young people, and children.
- For non-pregnant people who have a penicillin allergy or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable, the committee recommend clarithromycin (a macrolide) as an alternative. The committee agreed that macrolides are effective against the common pathogens that cause impetigo, and the evidence indicated that they are as effective as penicillins for treating impetigo.
- For pregnant women with a true penicillin allergy, NICE recommends erythromycin. The committee considered the MHRA Public Assessment Report on the safety of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy and the UK Teratology Information Service monograph on the use of macrolides in pregnancy and agreed that during pregnancy there should be an informed discussion of the potential benefits and harms of treatment. Afterwards, a macrolide can be used if there is a compelling clinical need and no suitable alternatives with adequate pregnancy safety data. Erythromycin is the preferred choice because there is more documented experience of its use than for other macrolides.
- The committee discussed that in its experience, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in impetigo is rare and that appropriate antibiotic choice may depend on local antimicrobial resistance rates. Therefore, a local microbiologist should be consulted if MRSA is suspected or confirmed.
Antibiotic dosages
- NICE found very little evidence on dosages of antibiotic treatments in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- The recommendations were, therefore, based on the committee's experience of current practice and the British National Formulary (BNF).
- Based on its experience that lower doses are not clinically effective due to poor oral bioavailability, the committee agreed that the higher dose of flucloxacillin recommended in the BNF is appropriate for treating impetigo in adults. In children, appropriate doses may vary depending on the child's age and weight.
Course length
- NICE found very little evidence on the course length of antibiotic treatments in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- The recommendations were, therefore, based on committee experience of current practice and the BNF.
- The committee agreed that the shortest course that is likely to be effective should be prescribed to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects.
- Based on experience and current practice, the committee agreed that 5 days of treatment would be sufficient for treating most people with impetigo. However, depending on the severity or number of lesions, some people may need a longer course (up to 7 days) based on clinical judgement.
How should I follow up a person with non-bullous impetigo?
- If symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or have not improved after completing a course of treatment:
- Reassess the person.
- Check compliance with initial treatment (hydrogen peroxide cream or antibiotics) and hygiene measures.
- Consider alternative diagnoses, risk factors, and possible complications of impetigo.
- Consider previous antibiotic use (which may have led to resistant bacteria).
- If topical hydrogen peroxide 1% was used, offer:
- A short course of a topical antibiotic if the impetigo remains localized, or
- A short course of a topical or oral antibiotic if the impetigo has become widespread.
- If a topical antibiotic was used:
- Offer a short course of an oral antibiotic, and
- Consider sending a skin swab for microbiological testing.
- If an oral antibiotic was used, consider sending a swab for microbiological testing.
- When results are available, adjust the antibiotic based on swab results, using a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible.
- If the infection is confirmed to be due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), see the prodigy topic on MRSA in primary care for more information.
- Reassess the person.
- If symptoms are recurrent:
- Send a skin swab for microbiological testing.
- When results are available, adjust the antibiotic based on swab results, using a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible.
- If the infection is confirmed to be due to MRSA, see the prodigy topic on MRSA in primary care for more information.
- Consider taking a nasal swab and starting treatment for decolonization.
- For information on decolonization, see the section on Staphylococcal carriage in the CKS topic on Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage.
- Send a skin swab for microbiological testing.
- If the person is systemically unwell or serious complications of impetigo have developed:
- Consider the need for referral/specialist advice.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].
Managing worsening or persistent symptoms
- NICE found no evidence for reassessing people with impetigo if initial treatment is unsuccessful. Therefore, the committee agreed on good practice points based on consensus.
- Based on its experience and the evidence for initial treatment, the committee agreed that if the initial treatment is unsuccessful, treatment should be optimised (depending on what was previously used) after considering alternative diagnoses, any symptoms or signs suggesting a more serious illness or condition (such as cellulitis), and previous antibiotic use (which may have led to resistant bacteria). CKS recommends also considering risk factors and possible complications of impetigo.
- NICE recommends that:
- If hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is ineffective for localized non-bullous impetigo, a short course of a topical antibiotic should be offered.
- If impetigo becomes widespread after treatment, a short course of a topical or oral antibiotic should be offered, in line with the recommendation for initial treatment for widespread non-bullous impetigo.
- If a topical antibiotic is unsuccessful, an oral antibiotic should be offered. Although there is no evidence that oral antibiotics are more effective than topical antibiotics, the committee agreed that an oral antibiotic is more likely to target all areas of infection and that there is a risk of inadequate application of topical antibiotics.
Managing recurrent symptoms
- For people with impetigo that recurs frequently, the committee agreed that a skin swab should be sent for microbiological testing to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. A nasal swab should also be considered if nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is suspected. A nasal or skin (or combination) decolonization regimen should be considered, based on clinical judgement and microbiological test results, to remove the bacteria causing recurrence of infection. The committee recognized that family decolonization may be appropriate in some cases but did not make a recommendation because this decision should be based on specialist advice.
- The NICE committee agreed on good practice for antimicrobial stewardship when reviewing the results of microbiological tests. This includes changing to a narrow-spectrum antibiotic or continuing with a narrow-spectrum antibiotic that has shown resistance in microbiological tests if symptoms are already improving.
Scenario: Bullous impetigo
From birth onwards.
When should I refer a person with bullous impetigo?
- Refer the person to hospital (the urgency depending on clinical judgement) if:
- A serious complication of impetigo is suspected, such as a deep soft tissue infection, or sepsis. See the CKS topic on Sepsis for more information.
- The person is immunosuppressed and the infection is widespread.
- Consider referral or seek specialist advice (urgency depending on clinical judgement) if:
- The person is systemically unwell.
- Impetigo recurs frequently.
- The person is at high risk of complications.
- The diagnosis is uncertain and differential diagnoses have been considered.
- Consult a local microbiologist if:
- Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected. For more information, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020] and on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- Referral is usually not necessary for people with impetigo. However, urgent assessment and consideration of parenteral antibiotics may be required in severe or complicated cases.
- Based on its experience, the NICE committee agreed that [NICE, 2020]:
- People who may have a more serious illness or condition or are immunocompromised with widespread impetigo need further assessment and treatment in hospital.
- Referral or specialist advice should be an option for people with difficult-to-treat impetigo (for example, bullous impetigo or impetigo that recurs frequently).
How should I manage a person with bullous impetigo?
If referral is not indicated:
- Advise on:
- The usual course of impetigo.
- Impetigo is usually a self-limiting condition.
- Without treatment, the infection heals in 7–21 days. However, appropriate treatment may lead to quicker resolution of infection and a reduced infective period.
- Impetigo usually heals completely without scarring, and complications are rare.
- What to do if symptoms worsen rapidly at any time, or do not improve after completing a course of treatment.
- Patient information leaflets on impetigo are available from the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and the NHS website.
- Hygiene measures to aid healing and reduce the spread of impetigo. They should:
- Wash affected areas with soap and water.
- Avoid touching or scratching patches of impetigo.
- Wash hands regularly, including after touching affected areas.
- Cover affected areas where possible.
- Not share towels, facecloths, and other personal care products.
- Clean equipment, including toys and play equipment, daily.
- Wash clothing and bedding in the hottest setting (at least 60 degrees). During the first few days of treatment, clothing and bedding should be washed and changed daily.
- Exclusion recommendations for people with impetigo.
- People with impetigo should not attend a setting (such as school, other childcare facilities, or work) until all lesions (sores or blisters) are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after commencing treatment (hydrogen peroxide cream or antibiotics).
- Food handlers are required by law to inform employers immediately if they have a disease likely to be transmitted (through food or afflicted), for example, infected wounds, skin infections, or sores.
- The usual course of impetigo.
- Ensure optimal treatment of any pre-existing skin conditions, such as eczema, head lice, scabies, or insect bites.
- For more information, see the CKS topics on Eczema - atopic, Head lice, Insect bites and stings, and Scabies.
- Offer a short course of an oral antibiotic.
- Reassess the person if symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or do not improve after completing the course of treatment.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], which is largely based on evidence from the Cochrane systematic review Interventions for Impetigo [Koning, 2012]; the systematic review Natural history of non-bullous impetigo: a systematic review of time to resolution or improvement without antibiotic treatment [Hoffmann, 2021]; the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Impetigo [PCDS, 2022a]; the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) guideline Managing specific infectious diseases: A to Z [UKHSA, 2023b]; and expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Quirke, 2022].
Advice on the usual course of impetigo
- Expert opinion in a systematic review is that discussions with people with impetigo should include the expected course of untreated impetigo [Hoffmann, 2021].
Advice on hygiene measures
- The NICE guideline committee advises, based on its experience, that good hygiene measures help reduce the spread of impetigo, both to other areas of the body and to other people [NICE, 2020].
- The recommended hygiene measures are based on expert opinion in the PCDS and UKHSA guidelines [PCDS, 2022a; UKHSA, 2023b] and in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2020; Quirke, 2022].
Advice on exclusion recommendations
- The recommendation that people with impetigo should not attend a setting until all lesions are healed, dry, and crusted over or until 48 hours after commencing treatment is based on the UKHSA guideline [UKHSA, 2023b].
- Scab formation, indicating healing, usually occurs within two days of starting antibiotic treatment. After consultation with expert reviewers, CKS infers that the term 'crusting' in the context refers to the scabs that form during the healing process (eschar) rather than the initial gold-crusted plaques typically seen at presentation.
- The recommendation that food handlers are required by law to inform employers immediately if they have a disease likely to be transmitted through food or afflicted is based on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) guideline Food Handlers: Fitness to Work. According to the FSA [FSA, 2009], which states that:
- The law requires that in all food businesses other than those engaged in primary production (for example, farmers and growers) and associated operations:
- No person suffering from, or being a carrier of, a disease likely to be transmitted through food or afflicted, for example, with infected wounds, skin infections, sores, or diarrhoea, is to be permitted to handle food or enter any food-handling area in any capacity if there is any likelihood of direct or indirect contamination.
- Any person so affected and employed in a food business and who is likely to come into contact with food is to report immediately the illness or symptoms and, if possible, their causes to their manager or supervisor.
- The law requires that in all food businesses other than those engaged in primary production (for example, farmers and growers) and associated operations:
Initial treatment
- Evidence identified by NICE showed that impetigo was cured or improved with a placebo in some people. However, given that impetigo is highly infectious, the NICE committee agreed that treatment is important to limit the spread of infection, limit the worsening of symptoms, and hasten recovery [NICE, 2020].
Treating bullous impetigo
- Evidence identified by NICE was limited to a small study in newborn babies. From its experience, the NICE committee discussed that the presence of bullae may mean that a topical antibiotic cannot reach the infected area. Therefore, it agreed that an oral antibiotic is needed to target the infection adequately [NICE, 2020].
Which antibiotic should I prescribe?
The recommended oral antibiotics for bullous impetigo are as follows. A 5-day treatment course is usually appropriate but can be increased to 7 days based on clinical judgement, depending on the severity and number of lesions.
For adults aged 18 years and over:
- Prescribe flucloxacillin 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If the person is allergic to penicillin or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable (for people who are not pregnant):
- Prescribe clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily for 5 days. For severe infections, the dosage can be increased to 500 mg twice daily.
- If the person is pregnant and allergic to penicillin:
- Prescribe erythromycin 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected or confirmed:
- Consult a local microbiologist.
For children and young people under 18 years:
- Prescribe flucloxacillin (oral solution or capsules):
- Age 1 month to 1 year — 62.5 mg to 125 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- Age 2–9 years — 125 mg to 250 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- Age 10 –17 years — 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If the child or young person is allergic to penicillin or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable (for example, if an oral solution is unpalatable and the child is unable to swallow capsules), prescribe clarithromycin.
- Age 1 month to 11 years:
- Under 8 kg — 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days.
- 8–11 kg — 62.5 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 12–19 kg — 125 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 20–29 kg — 187.5 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- 30–40 kg — 250 mg twice daily for 5 days.
- Ages 12–17 years — 250 mg twice daily for 5 days. For severe infections, the dosage can be increased to 500 mg twice daily.
- Age 1 month to 11 years:
- If the person is pregnant and allergic to penicillin:
- Ages 8-17 years — prescribe erythromycin 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5 days.
- If MRSA is suspected or confirmed, consult a local microbiologist.
For information on contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see the section on Prescribing information.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], which is largely based on evidence from the Cochrane systematic review Interventions for Impetigo [Koning, 2012].
Antibiotic choices
- NICE reviewed the evidence on antibiotic treatment in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- Based on its experience and knowledge of current practice, the committee agreed that the first-choice oral antibiotic in adults, young people, and children is flucloxacillin (a relatively narrow-spectrum penicillin that is effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes).
- The alternative oral antibiotic for non-pregnant people who have a penicillin allergy or if flucloxacillin is unsuitable is clarithromycin. Evidence showed that macrolides are as effective as penicillins for treating impetigo, and the NICE committee agreed that they are effective against the common causative pathogens.
- For pregnant women with a true penicillin allergy, NICE recommends erythromycin. The committee considered the MHRA Public Assessment Report on the safety of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy and the UK Teratology Information Service monograph on the use of macrolides in pregnancy and agreed that during pregnancy there should be an informed discussion of the potential benefits and harms of treatment. Afterwards, a macrolide can be used if there is a compelling clinical need and no suitable alternatives with adequate pregnancy safety data. Erythromycin is the preferred choice because there is more documented experience of its use than for other macrolides.
- The committee discussed that in its experience, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in impetigo is rare and that appropriate antibiotic choice may depend on local antimicrobial resistance rates. Therefore, a local microbiologist should be consulted if MRSA is suspected or confirmed.
Antibiotic dosages
- NICE found very little evidence on dosages of antibiotic treatments in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- The recommendations were, therefore, based on the committee's experience of current practice and the British National Formulary (BNF).
- Based on its experience that lower doses are not clinically effective due to poor oral bioavailability, the committee agreed that the higher dose of flucloxacillin recommended in the BNF is appropriate for treating impetigo in adults. In children, appropriate doses may vary depending on the age and weight of the child.
Course length
- NICE found very little evidence on the course length of antibiotic treatments in people with impetigo [NICE, 2020].
- The recommendations were, therefore, based on committee experience of current practice and the BNF.
- The committee agreed that the shortest course that is likely to be effective should be prescribed to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects.
- Based on experience and current practice, the committee agreed that 5 days of treatment would be sufficient for treating most people with impetigo. However, depending on the severity or number of lesions, some people may need a longer course (up to 7 days) based on clinical judgement.
How should I follow up a person with bullous impetigo?
- If symptoms worsen rapidly or significantly at any time or have not improved after completing a course of treatment:
- Reassess the person.
- Check compliance with initial treatment and hygiene measures.
- Consider alternative diagnoses, risk factors, and possible complications of impetigo.
- Consider previous antibiotic use (which may have led to resistant bacteria).
- Consider sending a swab for microbiological testing.
- When results are available, adjust the antibiotic based on swab results, using a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible.
- If the infection is confirmed to be due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care for more information.
- Reassess the person.
- If symptoms are recurrent:
- Send a skin swab for microbiological testing.
- When results are available, adjust the antibiotic based on swab results, using a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible.
- If infection is confirmed to be due to MRSA, see the prodigy topic on MRSA in primary care for more information.
- Consider taking a nasal swab and starting treatment for decolonization.
- For information on decolonization, see the section on Staphylococcal carriage in the CKS topic on Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage.
- Send a skin swab for microbiological testing.
- If the person is systemically unwell or serious complications of impetigo have developed:
- Consider the need for referral/specialist advice.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].
Managing worsening or persistent symptoms
- NICE found no evidence for reassessing people with impetigo if initial treatment is unsuccessful. Therefore, the committee agreed on good practice points based on consensus.
- Based on its experience and the evidence for initial treatment, the committee agreed that if the initial treatment is unsuccessful, treatment should be optimised (depending on what was previously used) after considering alternative diagnoses, any symptoms or signs suggesting a more serious illness or condition (such as cellulitis), and previous antibiotic use (which may have led to resistant bacteria). CKS recommends also considering risk factors and possible complications of impetigo.
- For people with impetigo that is worsening or has not improved after completing a course of oral antibiotics, NICE recommends considering sending a skin swab for microbiological testing, as microbiological testing of an area of infected skin may help guide antimicrobial prescribing.
Managing recurrent symptoms
- For people with impetigo that recurs frequently, the committee agreed that a skin swab should be sent for microbiological testing to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. A nasal swab should also be considered if nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is suspected. A nasal or skin (or combination) decolonization regimen should be considered, based on clinical judgement and microbiological test results, to remove the bacteria causing recurrence of infection. The committee recognized that family decolonization may be appropriate in some cases but did not make a recommendation because this decision should be based on specialist advice.
- The NICE committee agreed on good practice for antimicrobial stewardship when reviewing the results of microbiological tests. This includes changing to a narrow-spectrum antibiotic or continuing with a narrow-spectrum antibiotic that has shown resistance in microbiological tests if symptoms are already improving.
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section, specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Prescribing information
- Indication
- Hydrogen peroxide 1% cream is indicated for the treatment of non-bullous impetigo in people who are not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications [BNF, 2024].
- Contraindications and cautions
- Hydrogen peroxide cream should not be used on large or deep wounds or applied to healthy skin.
- Contact with the eye(s) should be avoided.
- Hydrogen peroxide can bleach clothing and other fabrics.
- Adverse effects
- A mild burning sensation may be experienced for a short time after applying hydrogen peroxide cream.
- Excipients in the cream may cause skin irritation and dermatitis.
- Drug interactions
- Hydrogen peroxide cream is incompatible with iodine, permanganates, and other stronger oxidising agents.
- Information and advice for people using hydrogen peroxide cream and/or their parents/carers
- Apply a thin layer to the affected area(s) 2–3 times a day for 5 days.
- After each application, a dry film will appear on the skin; this can be washed off with water.
- Do not apply to healthy skin or to large or deep wounds.
- Avoid contact with the eyes. If the cream comes into contact with the eye(s), rinse immediately with plenty of water until the cream residues have been removed.
- If a severe skin reaction occurs, stop the treatment and seek urgent medical advice.
Prescribing information
- Indication
- Topical fusidic acid 2% is indicated for the treatment of non-bullous impetigo in people who are not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications [BNF, 2024].
- Contraindications and cautions
- Contact with the eyes should be avoided due to the risk of conjunctival irritation.
- Fabric (such as clothing, bedding, and dressings) that has been in contact with topical fusidic acid burns more easily and is a serious fire hazard. Washing may reduce product build-up but not totally remove it.
- Adverse effects
- The most frequently reported adverse effects are skin reactions (such as dermatitis, pruritus, and rash) and application site reactions (such as pain and irritation).
- Other possible adverse effects include hypersensitivity, rash reactions (erythematous, pustular, vesicular, maculopapular, papular, and generalized), conjunctivitis, angioedema, urticaria, and blisters.
- Extended or recurrent use may increase the risk of contact sensitization and antibiotic resistance.
- Information and advice for people using topical fusidic acid and/or their parents/carers
- Apply a thin layer to the affected area(s) 3 times daily for 5 days.
- Avoid contact with the eyes. If the product comes into contact with the eye(s), rinse immediately with plenty of water until the residues have been removed.
- Do not smoke or go near naked flames during the use of topical fusidic acid due to the risk of severe burns.
- If a severe skin reaction occurs, stop the treatment and seek urgent medical advice.
Prescribing information
- Indication
- Topical mupirocin 2% is indicated for the treatment of non-bullous impetigo in people who are not systemically unwell or at high risk of complications [BNF, 2024].
- Contraindications and cautions
- Topical mupirocin should be avoided in people with moderate to severe renal impairment when absorption of large quantities may occur (contains polyethylene glycol, which is excreted renally).
- Topical mupirocin is not suitable for ophthalmic or intranasal use.
- Adverse effects
- The most common adverse effects are application site reactions, such as burning and, less commonly, itching, erythema, stinging, and dryness.
- Other adverse effects include cutaneous sensitization reactions and systemic allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, generalized rash, urticaria, and angioedema.
- Extended or recurrent use may increase the risk of contact sensitization and antibiotic resistance.
- Information and advice for people using topical mupirocin and/or their parents/carers
- Apply a thin layer to the affected area(s) 3 times a day for 5 days.
- Avoid contact with the eyes. If the product comes into contact with the eye(s), rinse immediately with plenty of water until the residues have been removed.
- If a severe skin reaction occurs, stop the treatment and seek urgent medical advice.
- Avoid mixing topical mupirocin with other topical preparations due to the risk of dilution, resulting in a reduction of the antibacterial activity and potential loss of stability of mupirocin in the preparation.
Flucloxacillin
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe flucloxacillin to people with:
- A true penicillin hypersensitivity — gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute a true penicillin allergy [NICE, 2014; Devchand, 2019; Stone, 2020].
- History of urticaria or rash immediately after penicillin administration — risk of immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins.
- History of a severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction (for example, anaphylaxis) to cephalosporins — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity between cephalosporins and penicillins.
- History of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice/hepatic dysfunction.
- Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution to people with:
- History of a minor rash (non-confluent, non-pruritic rash restricted to a small area of the body) or a rash that occurs more than 72 hours after administration of a penicillin — possibility of an allergic reaction to penicillin.
- History of allergy to cephalosporins or other medications.
- History of atopic allergy (including asthma, eczema, or hay fever) — high risk of anaphylactic reactions to penicillins.
- Hepatic impairment, especially if they have a serious underlying disease.
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 10 ml/minute) — consider a dose reduction or an extension of the dosing interval due to the risk of neurotoxicity.
Adverse effects
- For all penicillins
- The most common adverse effects are:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting.
- Skin reactions.
- Thrombocytopenia.
- The most significant adverse effect is hypersensitivity, which causes rashes and anaphylaxis and can be fatal.
- Allergic reactions occur in 1–10% of people treated with penicillin; anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of people.
- People with a history of atopic allergy (for example, asthma, eczema, and hay fever) are at a higher risk of anaphylactic reactions to penicillin.
- People with a history of anaphylaxis, urticaria, or rash immediately after penicillin administration are at risk of immediate hypersensitivity and should not take flucloxacillin.
- People with a history of a minor rash (non-confluent, non-pruritic rash restricted to a small area of the body) or a rash that occurs more than 72 hours after penicillin administration are probably not allergic to penicillin. Flucloxacillin should not be withheld unnecessarily for serious infections, but the possibility of an allergic reaction should be noted. Other beta-lactam antibiotics (including cephalosporins) can be used.
- People allergic to one penicillin will be allergic to all because the hypersensitivity is related to the basic penicillin structure.
- People with a history of immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins may also react to cephalosporins and other beta-lactam antibiotics, and so should not receive these antibiotics. There is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity of penicillins and cephalosporins.
- If a penicillin (or another beta-lactam) antibiotic is essential in a person with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins, specialist advice should be sought on hypersensitivity testing or using a beta-lactam antibiotic with a different structure to the penicillin that caused the hypersensitivity.
- Antibiotic-associated colitis has been reported and may range in severity from mild to life-threatening.
- Consider this diagnosis in people who present with diarrhoea during or after treatment with any antibiotic.
- The risk is increased with longer durations of antibiotic treatments, multiple antibiotics prescribed concurrently, or multiple courses of antibiotics.
- See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — arthralgia and leucopenia.
- Rare or very rare — agranulocytosis, angioedema, haemolytic anaemia, hepatic disorders, nephritis tubulointerstitial, neutropenia, seizure, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).
- The most common adverse effects are:
- For flucloxacillin
- Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported.
- These reactions are unrelated to the dose or route of administration of flucloxacillin.
- The onset of these hepatic effects may be delayed for up to two months post-treatment; in several cases, the course of the reactions has been protracted and lasted for some months.
- In very rare cases, a fatal outcome has been reported. Most reports of deaths have been in people aged 50 years and older and people with serious underlying disease.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Rare or very rare — eosinophilia, fever, and myalgia.
- Frequency not known — hypokalaemia, oesophageal disorder, oral pain, oropharyngeal pain, and throat irritation.
- Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported.
Drug interactions
- Drug interactions of flucloxacillin include:
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
- Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
- Methotrexate — reduced clearance and acute methotrexate toxicity have been attributed to concurrent use with some penicillins. Serious interactions are uncommon, but risk factors are as yet unknown. People taking low-dose methotrexate have been affected.
- High-dose methotrexate: standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination, which should be managed according to local guidelines.
- Low-dose methotrexate: consult local or national guidelines for recommendations on appropriate monitoring and management.
- Paracetamol — paracetamol has been reported to cause high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) when given with flucloxacillin.
- Be alert for signs and symptoms of HAGMA.
- Risk factors include severe renal impairment, sepsis, or malnutrition, especially if the maximum daily doses of paracetamol are used.
- On stopping paracetamol, HAGMA may persist with flucloxacillin alone.
- Phenindione — flucloxacillin is predicted to increase the risk of bleeding when given with phenindione.
- Consider increased monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) if flucloxacillin is started or stopped.
- Posaconazole and voriconazole — flucloxacillin (particularly high doses) appear to greatly decrease the concentrations of these antifungals.
- If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue).
- Probenecid — probenecid reduces the excretion of penicillins and usually increases their concentrations.
- Concurrent use with flucloxacillin can be beneficial. However, consider any detrimental effect elevated flucloxacillin concentrations may have on the person.
- Warfarin — flucloxacillin decreases the INR in people taking warfarin.
- Consider an interaction if otherwise unexplained decreases in INR occur.
- Monitor and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
Clarithromycin
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
- Electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia) — risk of prolongation of the QT interval.
- A history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including torsades de pointes arrhythmias.
- Severe hepatic impairment in combination with renal impairment.
- Prescribe clarithromycin with caution to people with:
- Impaired hepatic function (or concurrently taking potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver.
- Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances, or clinically relevant bradycardia — risk of QT interval prolongation.
- Myasthenia gravis — may aggravate symptoms.
- Renal impairment — dose reduction may be indicated based on creatinine clearance (CrCl):
- For immediate-release preparations, use half the usual dosage if CrCl is less than 30 mL/minute.
- For modified-release preparations, use half the usual dosage if CrCl is 30–60 mL/minute. Avoid if CrCl is less than 30 mL/minute.
- Be aware of severe drug interactions with clarithromycin.
Adverse effects
- For all macrolides
- The most common adverse effects are:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dyspepsia.
- Decreased appetite and altered taste.
- Dizziness, headache, vasodilation, and vision disorders.
- Hearing impairment.
- Insomnia.
- Pancreatitis.
- Paraesthesia and skin reactions.
- Antibiotic-associated colitis has been reported and may range in severity from mild to life-threatening.
- Consider this diagnosis in people who present with diarrhoea during or after treatment with any antibiotic.
- The risk is increased with longer durations of antibiotic treatment, multiple antibiotics prescribed concurrently, or multiple courses of antibiotics.
- See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — angioedema, anxiety, arrhythmias, candidal infection, chest pain, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, hepatic disorders, leucopenia, neutropenia, palpitations, QT interval prolongation, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), tinnitus, and vertigo.
- Rare or very rare — myasthenia gravis and nephritis tubulointerstitial.
- Frequency not known — altered smell, hallucination, hypotension, seizure, thrombocytopenia, and tongue discolouration.
- The most common adverse effects are:
- For clarithromycin
- Hepatic dysfunction has been reported.
- This includes increased liver enzymes, and hepatocellular and/or cholestatic hepatitis with or without jaundice.
- Hepatic dysfunction may be severe and is usually reversible. Cases of fatal hepatic failure have been reported.
- Advise people taking clarithromycin to stop treatment and seek medical advice if signs and symptoms of hepatic disease develop, such as anorexia, jaundice, dark urine, pruritus, or tender abdomen.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — burping, dry mouth, epistaxis, muscle complaints, oral disorders, thrombocytosis, and tremor.
- Frequency not known — abnormal dreams, agranulocytosis, depersonalization, depression, mania, myopathy, psychotic disorder, renal failure, tooth discolouration, and urine discolouration.
- Hepatic dysfunction has been reported.
Drug interactions
- Drug interactions of clarithromycin include:
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid clarithromycin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
- Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid clarithromycin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
- Antidiabetic drugs — concurrent use with oral hypoglycaemic drugs (such as sulfonylureas) or insulin can result in significant hypoglycaemia.
- Monitor blood glucose levels closely, and adjust the antidiabetic dose if necessary.
- Calcium channel blockers — clarithromycin possibly inhibits the metabolism of calcium channel blockers, such as verapamil and amlodipine, increasing the risk of hypotension and other adverse effects.
- Monitor for hypotension and other adverse effects, and adjust the dose of the calcium channel blocker if necessary.
- Digoxin — clarithromycin increases the plasma concentration of digoxin.
- Monitor for signs of digoxin adverse effects (bradycardia).
- Measure digoxin concentrations, and adjust the dose if problems develop.
- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) — clarithromycin increases the exposure to dabigatran, slightly increases the exposure to apixaban, and is predicted to increase the exposure to edoxaban.
- Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding or anaemia, especially in older people and people with renal impairment.
- Drugs that prolong the QT interval — clarithromycin can prolong the QT interval. Concurrent use with other drugs that prolong QT intervals can increase the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and torsades de pointes.
- Concurrent use with domperidone, ivabradine, or pimozide is contraindicated. Seek advice from a medical microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
- Most manufacturers advise avoiding the use of two or more drugs that are associated with QT prolongation.
- Increasing age, female sex, cardiac disease, and some metabolic disturbances (notably hypokalaemia) predispose to QT prolongation.
- Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics) — concurrent use with clarithromycin can predispose to QT prolongation.
- Monitor potassium concentrations closely.
- Drugs that induce cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) enzyme — concurrent use may decrease plasma concentrations of clarithromycin, leading to sub-therapeutic levels and reduced efficacy.
- Monitor concurrent use of clarithromycin and CYP3A4 enzyme inducers, such as rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and St. John's wort.
- It may also be necessary to monitor the plasma levels of the CYP3A4 inducer, which could be increased due to the inhibition of CYP3A4 by clarithromycin. For example, concurrent treatment with rifabutin and clarithromycin increases rifabutin levels and decreases clarithromycin levels.
- Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
- Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contra-indicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
- Statins — clarithromycin is a CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitor. Concurrent use with a statin metabolized by CYP3A4 will increase the plasma concentration of the statin, leading to an increased risk of myopathy (including rhabdomyolysis).
- Simvastatin is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Concurrent use with clarithromycin is contraindicated. If clarithromycin treatment cannot be avoided, withhold simvastatin for the duration of the clarithromycin course.
- Atorvastatin is moderately metabolized by CYP3A4. Avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, do not exceed 20 mg of atorvastatin daily. Advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Pravastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. However, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advises caution with clarithromycin. Advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Rosuvastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Fluvastatin is not dependent on CYP3A metabolism. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 — concurrent use with clarithromycin may increase plasma concentrations of the concurrent drug, leading to increased or prolonged therapeutic and adverse effects of the concurrent drug.
- Concurrent use with domperidone, pimozide, or terfenadine is contraindicated due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and torsades de pointes.
- Concurrent use with ergot alkaloids, oral midazolam, colchicine, ticagrelor, or ranolazine is contraindicated.
- Concurrent use of clarithromycin with other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 should be done with caution, especially if the other drug has a narrow safety margin (such as carbamazepine) or is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Dosage adjustments may be considered, and when possible, serum concentrations of the CYP3A4 substrate should be monitored closely.
- Warfarin — clarithromycin may enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.
- Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) closely, and adjust the warfarin dose if necessary.
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
Erythromycin
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe erythromycin to people with:
- A history of QT interval prolongation or ventricular arrhythmia (including torsade de pointes) — risk of QT interval prolongation.
- Electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia) — risk of QT interval prolongation.
- Prescribe erythromycin with caution to:
- People with:
- Impaired hepatic function (or concurrently receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — erythromycin is excreted principally in the liver.
- Moderate to severe impairment — consider dosage reduction due to the risk of ototoxicity.
- With cardiac disease or heart failure, conduction disturbances, or clinically relevant bradycardia (or concurrently receiving drugs associated with QT interval prolongation) — risk of QT interval prolongation.
- Myasthenia gravis — macrolides may aggravate symptoms.
- Acute porphyrias.
- Older people — may be more susceptible to drug-associated effects on the QT interval.
- People with:
Adverse effects
- For all macrolides
- The most common adverse effects are:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dyspepsia.
- Decreased appetite and altered taste.
- Dizziness, headache, vasodilation, and vision disorders.
- Hearing impairment.
- Insomnia.
- Pancreatitis.
- Paraesthesia and skin reactions.
- Antibiotic-associated colitis has been reported and may range in severity from mild to life-threatening.
- Consider this diagnosis in people who present with diarrhoea during or after treatment with any antibiotic.
- The risk is increased with longer durations of antibiotic treatment, multiple antibiotics prescribed concurrently, or multiple courses of antibiotics.
- See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — angioedema, anxiety, arrhythmias, candidal infection, chest pain, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, hepatic disorders, leucopenia, neutropenia, palpitations, QT interval prolongation, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), tinnitus, and vertigo.
- Rare or very rare — myasthenia gravis and nephritis tubulointerstitial.
- Frequency not known — altered smell, hallucination, hypotension, seizure, thrombocytopenia, and tongue discolouration.
- The most common adverse effects are:
- For erythromycin
- Increased risk of cardiotoxicity (QT interval prolongation) has been reported.
- Therefore, erythromycin should not be given to people with a history of QT interval prolongation, ventricular arrhythmia (including torsade de pointes), or electrolyte disturbances. See the section on Contraindications and cautions for more information.
- Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis has been reported.
- The risk is highest in the first 14 days after birth.
- Assess the benefit-risk balance of erythromycin treatment in infants.
- Advise parents and carers to seek medical attention if vomiting or irritability with feeding occurs in infants during treatment with erythromycin.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — hepatic dysfunction, including increased liver enzymes and/or cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice).
- Rare or very rare — hearing loss (can occur after large doses).
- Frequency not known — cerebral impairment.
- Increased risk of cardiotoxicity (QT interval prolongation) has been reported.
Drug interactions
- Drug interactions of erythromycin include:
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid erythromycin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
- Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid erythromycin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
- Calcium channel blockers — erythromycin possibly inhibits the metabolism of calcium channel blockers, such as verapamil and amlodipine, increasing the risk of hypotension and other adverse effects.
- Monitor for hypotension and other adverse effects, and adjust the dose of the calcium channel blocker if necessary.
- Hypotension, bradyarrhythmias, and lactic acidosis have been observed in people receiving concurrent verapamil.
- Ciclosporin — erythromycin significantly increases ciclosporin concentrations, and cases of toxicity have been reported. Erythromycin-related ototoxicity has also been reported.
- Monitor the concentration and effects (for example, on renal function) of ciclosporin more frequently if erythromycin is started or stopped.
- Adjust the ciclosporin dose as necessary.
- Cimetidine — cimetidine may inhibit the metabolism of erythromycin, leading to an increased plasma concentration.
- The general clinical importance of this interaction is uncertain.
- Monitor concurrent use for erythromycin adverse effects.
- Stop erythromycin if deafness occurs.
- Digoxin — erythromycin increases the plasma concentration of digoxin.
- Monitor for signs of digoxin adverse effects (bradycardia).
- Measure digoxin concentrations and adjust the dose if problems develop.
- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) — erythromycin is predicted to increase the exposure to DOACs, resulting in an increased risk of bleeding.
- Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding or anaemia, especially in older people and people with renal impairment.
- Drugs that prolong the QT interval — erythromycin can prolong the QT interval. Concurrent use with other drugs that prolong QT intervals can increase the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and torsades de pointes.
- Concurrent use with domperidone, tolterodine, mizolastine, or amisulpride is contraindicated.
- Most manufacturers advise avoiding the use of two or more drugs that are associated with QT prolongation.
- Increasing age, female sex, cardiac disease, and some metabolic disturbances (notably hypokalaemia) predispose to QT prolongation.
- Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics) — concurrent use with erythromycin can predispose to QT prolongation.
- Monitor potassium concentrations closely.
- Drugs that induce cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) enzyme — concurrent use with drugs such as rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, St John's Wort may induce the metabolism of erythromycin, leading to sub-therapeutic levels of erythromycin and a decreased effect. The induction decreases gradually two weeks after discontinued treatment with the CYP3A4 inducers.
- Avoid erythromycin during (and for two weeks after) treatment with a CYP3A4 inducer. If concurrent use is unavoidable, be alert for decreased erythromycin efficacy.
- It may also be necessary to monitor the plasma levels of the CYP3A4 inducer, which could be increased due to the inhibition of CYP3A4 by erythromycin. For example, concurrent treatment with rifabutin and erythromycin increases rifabutin levels and decreases erythromycin levels.
- Statins — erythromycin is a CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitor. Concurrent use with a statin metabolized by CYP3A4 will increase the plasma concentration of the statin, leading to an increased risk of myopathy (including rhabdomyolysis).
- Simvastatin is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Concurrent use with erythromycin is contraindicated. If erythromycin treatment cannot be avoided, withhold simvastatin for the duration of the erythromycin course.
- Atorvastatin is moderately metabolized by CYP3A4. Avoid concurrent use with erythromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, withhold atorvastatin for the duration of the erythromycin course or consider a lower maximum dose of atorvastatin.
- Pravastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. However, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advises caution with erythromycin. Advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Rosuvastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Fluvastatin is not dependent on CYP3A4 metabolism. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 — concurrent use with erythromycin may increase plasma concentrations of the concurrent drug, leading to increased or prolonged therapeutic and adverse effects of the concurrent drug.
- Concurrent use with pimozide or terfenadine is contraindicated. Erythromycin significantly alters the metabolism of these drugs, and rare cases of serious, potentially fatal cardiovascular events, including cardiac arrest, torsade de pointes, and other ventricular arrhythmias, have been observed.
- Concurrent use with ergot alkaloids is contraindicated.
- For other medications, appropriate monitoring should be undertaken and dosages adjusted as necessary.
- Theophylline — erythromycin can reduce theophylline clearance, leading to raised theophylline levels and potential theophylline toxicity. Oral erythromycin exposure may be reduced by theophylline. Theophylline can cause hypokalaemia, increasing the risk of torsade de pointes, which might be additive with the effects of erythromycin.
- Monitor theophylline levels and adjust the dose accordingly.
- Monitor the effects of erythromycin to ensure they are adequate.
- Monitor potassium concentrations closely.
- Warfarin — erythromycin increases the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.
- Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
[MHRA, 2014; EMC, 2023f; EMC, 2023e; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]
Supporting evidence
The recommendations in this CKS topic are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020]. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of impetigo.
Search dates
August 2018 - December 2023
Key search terms
The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCO MEDLINE (searched 31st July 2018). These terms were combined with search filters for systematic reviews and guidelines in EBSCO MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases.
S3 S1 OR S2
S2 AB impetigo OR TI impetigo
S1 (MH "Impetigo")
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Allmon, A., Deane, K. and Martin, K.L. (2015) Common skin rashes in children. American Family Physician 92(3), 211-216. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2020) Impetigo. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. http://bestpractice.bmj.com
- BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Bowen, A.C., Mahé, A., Hay, R.J., et al. (2015) The Global Epidemiology of Impetigo: A Systematic Review of the Population Prevalence of Impetigo and Pyoderma. PLoS One 10(8), e0136789.
- CDC (2022) Impetigo. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov [Free Full-text]
- Devchand, M. and Trubiano, J.A. (2019) Penicillin allergy: a practical approach to assessment and prescribing. Australian Prescriber 42(6), 192-199. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Elliot, A., Cross, K., Smith G., et al. (2006) The association between impetigo, insect bites and air temperature: a retrospective 5-year study (1999-2003) using morbidity data collected from a sentinel general practice network database. Family Practice 23(5), 490-496. [Abstract]
- EMC (2019) SPC for Crystacide Cream 1%. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023a) SPC for Fucidin 20 mg/g Cream. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023b) SPC for Mupirocin 2% w/w Ointment. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023c) SPC for Flucloxacillin 500 mg capsules, hard. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023d) SPC for Clarithromycin 250mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023e) SPC for erythromycin 250 mg gastro-resistant tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023f) SPC for Atorvastatin 40 mg Film-coated Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2024) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg/5 ml granules for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
- FSA (2009) Food Handlers: Fitness to Work. Food Standards Agency. http://www.food.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Hartman-Adams, H., Banvard, C. and Juckett, G. (2014) Impetigo: diagnosis and treatment. American Family Physician 90(4), 229-235.
- Hoffmann, T. C., Peiris, R., Glasziou, P., et al. (2021) Natural history of non-bullous impetigo: a systematic review of time to resolution or improvement without antibiotic treatment. British Journal of General Practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 71(704), e237-e242. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Koning, S., van der Sande, R., Verhagen, A.P., et al. (2012) Interventions for impetigo (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- MHRA (2014) Statins: interactions, and updated advice for atorvastatin. Drug Safety Update 1(6), 2. [Free Full-text]
- MHRA (2020) Erythromycin: caution required due to cardiac risks (QT interval prolongation); drug interaction with rivaroxaban. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2014) Drug allergy: diagnosis and management. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2020) Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- PCDS (2022a) Impetigo. Primary Care dermatology Society. http://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- PCDS (2022b) Staphylococcal Scalded Skin syndrome (syn. Ritter disease; staphylococcal epidermal necrolysis). Primary Care Dermatology Society. http://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Preston, C.L (2024) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
- Quirke, K (2022) Impetigo. DermNet. http://dermnetnz.org [Free Full-text]
- Stone Jr, C.A., Trubiano, J., Coleman, D. T., et al. (2020) The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy. Allergy 75(2), 273-288. [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2023a) Health protection in children and young people settings, including education. UK Health Security Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2023b) Managing specific infectious diseases: A to Z. UK Health Security Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]