Cardiovascular Haematology
Deep vein thrombosis
Last revised in July 2025
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation of a thrombus in a deep vein, usually in the legs, which partially or completely obstructs blood flow
Deep vein thrombosis: Summary
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation of a thrombus (blood clot) in a deep vein (usually in the legs), which partially or completely obstructs blood flow.
- Provoked DVT is DVT in a person with a recent (within 3 months) and transient major clinical risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as surgery, trauma, significant immobility, or pregnancy, or in a person on hormonal treatment (combined oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy).
- Unprovoked DVT is DVT in a person with no recent major clinical risk factor for VTE who is not having hormonal treatment.
- DVT has an annual incidence of about 1–2 per 1000 people.
- The most serious complication is pulmonary embolism.
- The possibility of DVT should be considered if typical symptoms and signs are present, especially if there are risk factors.
- Typical symptoms and signs are localized pain and swelling, tenderness, skin changes (oedema, redness, and warmth), and prominent superficial veins.
- Symptoms are usually unilateral and may be very subtle (or absent).
- If DVT is suspected:
- A physical exam should be performed, along with a review of the person's medical history, to exclude differential diagnoses, such as trauma, superficial thrombophlebitis, and post-thrombotic syndrome.
- The two-level DVT Wells score should be used to assess the likelihood of DVT and inform further management.
- If DVT is likely, a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 4 hours should be offered.
- If the scan cannot be carried out within 4 hours, a D-dimer test should be offered, followed by interim therapeutic anticoagulation and a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 24 hours.
- If DVT is unlikely, a D-dimer test with the result available within 4 hours should be offered. If the D-dimer result cannot be obtained within 4 hours, interim anticoagulation should be offered while awaiting the result.
- If the D-dimer test is positive, a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 4 hours should be offered. If the result cannot be obtained within 4 hours, interim therapeutic anticoagulation and a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan, with the result available within 24 hours, should be offered.
- If the D-dimer test is negative, interim therapeutic anticoagulation should be stopped and an alternative diagnosis considered.
- After hospital treatment, people with confirmed DVT will require maintenance anticoagulation treatment (for at least 3 months) to prevent DVT recurrence. Primary care management includes:
- Prescribing and monitoring maintenance anticoagulation treatment.
- Giving appropriate information and advice, including the dose and duration of treatment, how anticoagulation can affect activities such as sports and travel, and when and how to seek medical help (for example, if there are signs or symptoms of bleeding or recurrent DVT).
- Addressing modifiable risk factors for DVT, such as obesity.
- Ensuring that people with unprovoked DVT are investigated for undiagnosed cancer and offered thrombophilia testing (where appropriate).
Have I got the right topic?
From age 16 years onwards.
This CKS topic covers the identification and management of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It also covers the ongoing management of a person with confirmed DVT following hospital treatment.
This CKS topic does not cover hospital treatment of DVT, primary prevention of DVT, management of people with coagulation disorders, or management of people with recurrent DVT who require long-term anticoagulation.
There are separate CKS topics Anticoagulation - oral, DVT prevention for travellers, Thrombophlebitis - superficial, Leg cramps, and Leg ulcer - venous.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
July 2025 — minor update. Wording changed in the summary section describing the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis to align more closely with NICE guidance NG158.
Previous changes
February 2025 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.
June 2023 — minor update. The dosing regimen of enoxaparin has been updated in line with the manufacturer's summary of product characteristics (SPC).
February 2022 — minor update. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis has been added as a potential adverse effect of enoxaparin.
November 2020 — minor update. A typographical error has been corrected.
October 2020 — minor update. The contraindications of dalteparin have been updated in line with the manufacturer's revised SPC.
March 2020 — minor update. The management section has been updated in line with the updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing [NICE, 2020].
November 2019 to January 2020 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2019 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of this topic.
September 2018 — minor update. Details of a randomized placebo-controlled trial that informed the update to the NICE guideline CG144 have been added to the Basis for recommendation section for the section on Follow up for DVT.
January 2018 — minor update. The recommendation on the use of elastic graduated compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) or venous thromboembolism recurrence after a proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been updated in line with updates to NICE guideline CG144.
December 2013 — minor update. Duplicate text deleted. Reference to prescriptions in the CKS topic on Compression stockings has been removed.
April 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. Based on the new NICE guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: the management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing, the recommendations for the management of suspected DVT have been revised to include the option of giving an interim 24-hour dose of parenteral anticoagulant if a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan cannot be carried out within 4 hours of being requested.
September 2011 — minor update. All references to the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) guideline on oral anticoagulation with warfarin have been updated to reflect the latest guideline.
June 2010 — minor update. The recommendation on the class of compression stockings for preventing DVT or PTS has been updated.
January 2010 — minor update. The Basis for recommendation section for section on Management of suspected DVT has been updated to clarify why CKS recommends using the Wells Clinical Prediction Rule in preference to other clinical prediction rules (when D-dimer testing is available in primary care).
December 2008 to March 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
June 2007 — updated to include a link to the recent Patient Safety Alert from the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) on actions that can make anticoagulant therapy safer. The BCSH's advice on managing people on oral anticoagulants requiring dental surgery was also included. Advice on managing interactions with warfarin was reformatted.
July 2006 — minor update to include advice from the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) regarding the potential interaction between warfarin and glucosamine.
October to December 2005 — reviewed. Validated in March 2006 and issued in May 2006.
July 2005 — minor update to include prescribing information for compression stockings.
July 2002 — reviewed. A section on Advice on risk of travel-related deep vein thrombosis was added. Validated in October 2002 and issued in December 2002.
February 2001 — reviewed to incorporate the recommendations of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Antithrombotic Therapy (1999).
February 1999 — written. Validated in April 1999 and issued in August 1999.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 October 2024.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 October 2024.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 October 2024.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 October 2024.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 October 2024.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 October 2024.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 October 2024.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 October 2024.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Assess the likelihood of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- Refer people with suspected DVT appropriately to hospital for further investigation and, if required, management.
- Initiate interim therapeutic anticoagulation if required.
- Manage people with confirmed DVT appropriately after initial treatment in hospital.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.NICE quality standards
Venous thromboembolism in adults
- People aged 18 and over with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) Wells score of 2 points or more have a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan within 4 hours of it being requested.
- People aged 18 and over taking anticoagulation treatment after a VTE have a review at 3 months and then at least once a year if they continue to take it long term.
Background information
What is it?
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the term used to describe the formation of a thrombus (blood clot) in a deep vein, which partially or completely obstructs blood flow.
- The thrombus can dislodge and travel in the blood, especially to the pulmonary arteries. This is known as a pulmonary embolism (PE). For more information, see the CKS topic on Pulmonary embolism.
- Thrombosis usually affects the deep veins of the legs or pelvis but may affect other sites, such as the upper limbs and the intracranial and splanchnic veins.
- The term 'venous thromboembolism' (VTE) describes any thromboembolic event occurring within the venous system, including DVT and PE.
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) refers to DVT as provoked or unprovoked [NICE, 2023]:
- Provoked DVT is DVT in a person with a recent (within 3 months) and transient major clinical risk factor for VTE, such as surgery, trauma, significant immobility, pregnancy or puerperium, or in a person who is having hormonal treatment (combined oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy).
- Unprovoked DVT is DVT in a person with no recent major clinical risk factor for VTE who is not having hormonal treatment.
How common is it?
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition affecting around 1–2 per 1000 people annually. About two-thirds of all cases are deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and one-third pulmonary embolism (PE).
- The incidence of DVT during pregnancy is approximately 1 in 1000 live births.
- In people who are critically ill, an incidence of up to 37.2% has been reported.
What are the risk factors?
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is more likely to occur in people with continuing or intrinsic risk factors, such as:
- A history of DVT.
- Cancer (known or undiagnosed).
- Age over 60 years.
- Being overweight or obese.
- Male sex.
- Heart failure.
- Medical illness, for example, acute infection.
- Acquired or familial thrombophilia.
- Inflammatory disorders (for example, vasculitis, inflammatory bowel disease).
- Varicose veins.
- Smoking.
- Risk factors that temporarily raise the likelihood of DVT include:
- Recent major surgery.
- Recent hospitalization.
- Recent trauma.
- Chemotherapy.
- Significant immobility (bedbound, unable to walk unaided, or likely to spend a substantial portion of the day in bed or a chair).
- Prolonged travel (for more than 4 hours).
- Significant or direct trauma to a vein (for example, intravenous catheter).
- Hormone treatment (oestrogen-containing contraception or hormone replacement therapy).
- Pregnancy and the postpartum period.
- Dehydration.
[SIGN, 2014; Di Nisio, 2016; Streiff, 2016; NICE, 2023; BMJ, 2024]
What are the complications?
- Complications of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) include:
- Pulmonary embolism — a life-threatening condition in which one or more emboli, usually arising from a blood clot formed in the veins, are lodged in and obstruct the pulmonary arterial system, causing severe respiratory dysfunction. For more information, see the CKS topic on Pulmonary embolism.
- Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) — caused by chronic obstruction of venous outflow and/or destruction of venous valves, resulting in increased venous pressure and impaired blood flow. Symptoms include leg pain, swelling, dermatitis, and, in severe cases, ulcers. Up to 50% of people develop some symptoms of PTS within 2 years of having a lower limb DVT. For more information, see the CKS topic on Leg ulcer - venous.
- Venous insufficiency (poor circulation) — caused by venous valve incompetence or an impaired calf muscle pump, resulting in sustained venous hypertension. For more information, see the CKS topic on Venous eczema and lipodermatosclerosis.
- Recurrent DVT — previous clot formation can affect venous valves and blood flow, increasing the risk of new clots developing in the same or other veins.
Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis
When should I suspect deep vein thrombosis?
- Consider the possibility of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) if typical symptoms and signs are present, especially if there are risk factors (such as previous DVT and immobility).
- Symptoms and signs of DVT are usually unilateral and include:
- Pain or tenderness (often described as throbbing or cramping and occurs while walking or weight-bearing).
- Swelling (often noticeable in the calf).
- Skin changes, including pitting oedema, redness, and warmth.
- Prominent (dilated) superficial veins.
- Symptoms range from severe to very subtle, and the person can be asymptomatic.
- Symptoms and signs of DVT are usually unilateral and include:
- Perform a physical examination and review the person's general medical history to exclude differential diagnoses (such as trauma and superficial thrombophlebitis).
- Assess leg and thigh swelling: measure the circumference of the leg 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity and compare it with the asymptomatic leg. A difference of more than 3 cm between the extremities increases the probability of DVT.
- Assess for oedema and dilated collateral superficial veins on the affected side.
- Use the two-level DVT Wells score to assess the likelihood of DVT and inform further management.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing [NICE, 2023], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism [SIGN, 2014], and expert opinion in review articles Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [Di Nisio, 2016], Deep vein thrombosis [Stubbs, 2018], and Deep vein thrombosis [BMJ, 2024].
What are the differential diagnoses of deep vein thrombosis?
- Differential diagnoses of deep vein thrombosis include:
- Physical trauma, for example:
- Calf muscle tear/Achilles tendon tear.
- Calf muscle haematoma.
- Fracture.
- Cardiovascular disorders, for example:
- Superficial thrombophlebitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Thrombophlebitis - superficial.
- Post-thrombotic syndrome.
- Venous obstruction or insufficiency, or external compression of major veins (for example, by a fetus during pregnancy or cancer).
- Arteriovenous fistula and congenital vascular abnormalities.
- Acute arterial ischaemia.
- Vasculitis.
- Heart failure. For more information, see the CKS topic on Heart failure - chronic.
- Other conditions, including:
- Ruptured Baker's cyst. For more information, see the CKS topic on Baker's cyst.
- Cellulitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute.
- Dependent (stasis) oedema.
- Lymphatic obstruction.
- Septic arthritis.
- Cirrhosis.
- Nephrotic syndrome.
- Compartment syndrome.
- Physical trauma, for example:
Basis for recommendation
This information is based on expert opinion in review articles Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? [Anand et al, 1998], ABC of arterial and venous disease: swollen lower limb-1: general assessment and deep vein thrombosis [Gorman, 2000], Diagnosis, investigation, and management of deep vein thrombosis [Tovey, 2003], Deep vein thrombosis [BMJ, 2024].
Management
Scenario: Management of deep vein thrombosis
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage a person with suspected deep vein thrombosis?
- If deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is suspected in a woman who is pregnant or in the postpartum period (within the past 6 weeks), arrange immediate referral for same-day assessment and management.
- For all other people with suspected DVT, use the two-level DVT Wells score to assess the probability of DVT:
- Score one point for each of the following:
- Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within the last 6 months, or palliative).
- Paralysis, paresis, or recent plaster immobilization of the legs.
- Recently bedridden for 3 days or more, or major surgery within the last 12 weeks requiring general or regional anaesthesia.
- Localized tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system (such as the back of the calf).
- Entire leg is swollen.
- Calf swelling at least 3 cm larger than the asymptomatic leg.
- Pitting oedema confined to the symptomatic leg.
- Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose).
- Previously documented DVT.
- Subtract two points if an alternative cause is considered at least as likely as DVT.
- The risk of DVT is likely if the score is two points or more and unlikely if the score is one point or less.
- Score one point for each of the following:
- If DVT is likely (Wells score 2 points or more), offer a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 4 hours if possible.
- If the scan cannot be carried out within 4 hours of being requested, offer a D-dimer test, then interim therapeutic anticoagulation and a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 24 hours.
- If DVT is unlikely (Wells score 1 point or less), offer a D-dimer test with the result available within 4 hours if possible. If the D-dimer result cannot be obtained within 4 hours, offer interim therapeutic anticoagulation while awaiting the result.
- If the D-dimer test is positive, offer a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 4 hours.
- If the result cannot be obtained within 4 hours, offer interim therapeutic anticoagulation and a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 24 hours.
- If the D-dimer test is negative:
- Stop interim therapeutic anticoagulation.
- Consider an alternative diagnosis.
- Advise the person that it is unlikely they have DVT, but they should be aware of the signs and symptoms of DVT and seek medical help if symptoms worsen or they experience chest pain or breathing difficulties.
- If the D-dimer test is positive, offer a proximal leg vein ultrasound scan with the result available within 4 hours.
- If interim therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated:
- Offer apixaban or rivaroxaban first-line, considering comorbidities, contraindications, the person's preferences, and local protocols.
- If apixaban or rivaroxaban are unsuitable, consider:
- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for at least 5 days, followed by dabigatran or edoxaban, or
- LMWH alongside a vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) for at least 5 days.
- For prescribing information on anticoagulants, see the sections on Oral anticoagulants and Parenteral anticoagulants.
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has produced a visual summary of the recommendations on anticoagulation treatment for DVT, which includes anticoagulation options for people with renal impairment, active cancer, or antiphospholipid syndrome.
- When using interim therapeutic anticoagulation:
- Perform baseline blood tests, including full blood count, renal and hepatic function, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
- Do not wait for the results of baseline blood tests before starting anticoagulation treatment.
- Review and, if necessary, act on the results of baseline blood tests within 24 hours of starting interim therapeutic anticoagulation.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing [NICE, 2023].
Referral of pregnant and postpartum women
- This recommendation is extrapolated from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline Thromboembolic Disease in Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Acute Management (Green-top Guideline No. 37b) [RCOG, 2015].
- The RCOG recommends that pregnant or postpartum women with symptoms or signs of venous thromboembolism (VTE) should have objective testing performed expeditiously and should be treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) until the diagnosis is excluded by objective testing unless treatment is strongly contraindicated.
- It is not possible to accurately assess the risk of DVT in primary care based on the usual methods of assessment because:
- There is no evidence to support the use of pre-test probability assessment in the management of acute VTE in pregnancy.
- D-dimer testing should not be performed in the investigation of acute VTE in pregnancy.
The Wells score
- The Wells score is a clinical prediction rule for estimating the probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).
- Although several versions of the Wells score are available, NICE recommends the two-level DVT Wells score as it is more relevant, up-to-date, and consistent with their latest understanding of VTE risks [NICE, 2023].
D-dimer test
- The formation of a thrombus is normally followed by an immediate fibrinolytic response, resulting in the generation of plasmin that causes the release of fibrin degradation products (predominantly containing D-dimer) into the circulation [NCGC, 2012].
- A negative D-dimer assay implies that thrombosis is not occurring and thus has a role in excluding a diagnosis of DVT (along with clinical scores and imaging).
- Although a positive D-dimer result can indicate thrombosis, other possible causes of a raised D-dimer include liver disease, inflammation, malignancy, pregnancy, trauma, and recent surgery.
- D-dimer tests have relatively high sensitivity but low specificity (false-positive results are common). Therefore, whilst a negative D-dimer may be useful in excluding DVT, a positive D-dimer is of no diagnostic value but merely mandates further testing.
- A negative D-dimer test is good enough to exclude the diagnosis of DVT in people with an unlikely pre-test clinical probability but not good enough to exclude the diagnosis of DVT in those with a likely pre-test probability.
- The D-dimer test should be carried out before interim therapeutic anticoagulation is started because anticoagulation can affect the D-dimer result [NICE, 2023].
Choice of anticoagulant for interim therapeutic anticoagulation
- NICE did not find any evidence specifically on interim anticoagulation treatment for suspected DVT. However, the committee agreed that it is vital to start treatment if DVT is suspected and diagnostic test results are delayed by more than 4 hours. They reasoned that anticoagulation treatments that are effective for confirmed DVT are likely to be equally effective when used as interim treatment while awaiting a confirmed diagnosis [NICE, 2023].
- NICE recommends, where possible, choosing an interim anticoagulant that can be continued if DVT is confirmed, as this improves safety and convenience. However, the committee acknowledged that local protocols and drug availability may necessitate the use of different anticoagulants before and after diagnosis [NICE, 2023].
- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are first-line treatment options for VTE because they are associated with a lower risk of bleeding than vitamin K antagonists and are easier to use [Di Nisio, 2016].
- Apixaban and rivaroxaban are convenient for initiating treatment as their quick onset of action negates the need for parenteral treatment. Dabigatran (an oral thrombin inhibitor) and edoxaban (a factor Xa inhibitor) are also licensed for treating DVT. However, treatment should follow the initial use of parenteral anticoagulant for at least 5 days [BNF, 2025].
How should I manage a person following hospital treatment for confirmed deep vein thrombosis?
After hospital treatment, people with confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) will be offered maintenance anticoagulation treatment (if no contraindications) to prevent early recurrences. The treatment is usually continued for at least 3 months; however, the duration may be longer if the DVT was unprovoked (no obvious, transient risk factor identified) and the risk of recurrence outweighs the risk of major bleeding.
- Continue prescribing and monitoring maintenance anticoagulation treatment.
- The anticoagulant effect of warfarin is measured as the international normalized ratio (INR).
- Direct oral anticoagulants (such as apixaban) do not require INR monitoring, but regular follow up (at 1 month and then at least annually) is recommended to check treatment compliance, monitor for adverse effects (such as bleeding), and assess ongoing suitability.
- For more information, see the CKS topic on Anticoagulation – oral.
- Give verbal and written information on:
- The recommended dose and duration of anticoagulant treatment.
- Adverse effects, drug interactions, and monitoring requirements.
- What to do if they are planning a pregnancy or become pregnant.
- How anticoagulation treatment can affect dental treatment and activities such as sports.
- The risks associated with long-haul travel. For more information, see the section on Recent DVT in the CKS topic on DVT prevention for travellers.
- When and how to seek medical help (for example, if there are signs and symptoms of bleeding or recurrent DVT).
- The importance of carrying an 'anticoagulant alert card' at all times.
- Manage modifiable risk factors for DVT, such as obesity. For more information, see the CKS topic on Obesity.
- Ensure that people with unprovoked DVT are:
- Investigated for undiagnosed cancer. For more information, see the section on Investigations for cancer.
- Offered thrombophilia testing (where appropriate). For more information, see the section on Thrombophilia testing.
- Do not offer graduated elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent recurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome or venous thromboembolism after a proximal DVT.
- This recommendation does not cover the use of ECS for managing leg symptoms after DVT.
- If ECS are offered to manage leg symptoms after a DVT, explain how to apply and use them, how long they should be worn, and when they should be replaced.
- For more information, see the section on Compression stockings in the CKS topic on DVT prevention for travellers.
Investigations for cancer and thrombophilia testing
Investigation for cancer
- For people with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who are not known to have cancer:
- Review the medical history and baseline blood test results, including full blood count, renal and hepatic function, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and offer a physical examination.
- Do not offer further investigations for cancer to people with unprovoked DVT unless they have relevant clinical symptoms or signs.
Thrombophilia testing
- If it is planned to stop anticoagulation treatment:
- Consider testing for antiphospholipid antibodies in people who have had unprovoked DVT.
- Consider testing for hereditary thrombophilia in people who have had unprovoked DVT and who have a first-degree relative who has had DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE).
- Be aware that these tests can be affected by anticoagulants — specialist advice may be required.
- Do not offer:
- Testing for hereditary thrombophilia to people who are continuing anticoagulation treatment.
- Thrombophilia testing to people who have had provoked DVT.
- Do not routinely offer thrombophilia testing to first-degree relatives of people with a history of DVT or PE and thrombophilia.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing [NICE, 2023].
Investigation for cancer
- Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with an increased risk of cancer, which may be undiagnosed when the VTE occurs [NICE, 2023].
- The NICE committee agreed that a physical examination and review of medical history (including previous investigations such as imaging) are worthwhile precautions for people who have had an apparently unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the evidence showed no benefit from additional cancer investigations in the absence of signs or symptoms. Considering that such investigations can be costly, time-consuming, potentially invasive (or pose radiation risks), and may cause anxiety, the committee does not recommend offering further cancer investigations to people without relevant signs or symptoms.
Thrombophilia testing
- Thrombophilia is an acquired or inherited predisposition to venous thrombosis. The NICE guideline development group (GDG) defines thrombophilia testing as testing for heritable thrombophilia (including deficiencies in one of the three natural anticoagulants: antithrombin, protein C, and protein S) or antiphospholipid antibodies. Thrombophilia testing may be clinically useful in a person with VTE if [NICE, 2023]:
- Initiation and intensity of anticoagulant treatment differs in those with a positive test.
- The finding of a thrombophilia increases the risk of recurrence such that long-term rather than short-term anticoagulation is favoured.
- Action can be taken to prevent VTE in a family member.
Considering antiphospholipid antibody testing
- Antiphospholipid syndrome is relatively uncommon; however, the probability of a positive test will be increased in people with an unprovoked VTE.
- The NICE GDG considered that the additional risk associated with antiphospholipid syndrome was not great. Therefore, testing should only be considered if, after assessment of the other risk factors in a person with an unprovoked VTE, the plan is to stop anticoagulation.
- If there is an absolute contraindication to continuing anticoagulation or the person does not wish to continue with anticoagulation even if they tested positive, testing would not be required.
- People continuing on anticoagulation treatment for other reasons do not require testing as it will not alter management.
Considering testing for hereditary thrombophilia
- The NICE GDG considered that the test for hereditary thrombophilia should be offered to all people with unprovoked VTE who have a first-degree relative with VTE to reduce the risk of missing cases of hereditary thrombophilia.
- It was noted that testing for heritable thrombophilia in unselected people with VTE may not usefully predict recurrence. However, identifying a natural anticoagulant deficiency in those with unprovoked DVT and a family history of VTE may indicate a higher recurrence risk, favouring long-term anticoagulation.
- The GDG also highlighted that in unselected people, having a first-degree relative with VTE does not help to identify people with hereditary thrombophilia. However, penetrant mutations in thrombosis-prone families will more likely be found where there is a thrombosis at a young age (less than 50 years).
Not offering testing for hereditary thrombophilia if continuing anticoagulation treatment
- In the absence of evidence of the clinical effectiveness of thrombophilia testing in reducing recurrent VTE, the NICE GDG considered whether thrombophilia testing may lead to any changes in management that would improve outcomes.
- The GDG agreed that if a decision is made to continue anticoagulation treatment, it is unnecessary to offer thrombophilia testing as the results would not alter management. However, if anticoagulation is discontinued, thrombophilia testing may be considered in select people.
Not offering thrombophilia testing to people with provoked DVT
- The NICE GDG highlighted that people who have had a provoked VTE are at less risk of recurrence and will be given short-term anticoagulation as standard treatment whether they have thrombophilia or not.
- Therefore, thrombophilia testing is not useful as it does not change management.
Not routinely offering thrombophilia testing to first-degree relatives of people with a history of VTE and thrombophilia
- Thrombophilia testing for first-degree relatives of people with thromboembolic disease and thrombophilia could theoretically help reduce VTE risk if suitable interventions are available for affected relatives. However, a family history of VTE increases the risk regardless of thrombophilia status, and these relatives would still receive thromboprophylaxis in high-risk situations (such as surgery, trauma, or immobilization).
- Therefore, thrombophilia testing is not routinely required because it does not impact decision-making for thromboprophylaxis.
Compression stockings
- NICE reviewed the evidence on the efficacy of elastic compression stockings (ECS) in preventing post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after proximal DVT, including a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial (n = 806) that compared active ECS with placebo ECS and found that compression stockings did not prevent PTS after a first proximal DVT [Kahn, 2014]. Based on the evidence reviewed and detailed discussions, the committee concluded that the available evidence does not support the use of graduated ECS to prevent PTS or VTE recurrence and recommends against their use for preventative purposes. However, recognizing that some people find ECS beneficial for managing leg symptoms after DVT, the committee clarified that this recommendation does not apply to their use for managing leg symptoms [NICE, 2015; NICE, 2023].
- A Cochrane systematic review (search date March 2017) identified low-quality evidence indicating that ECS may help reduce PTS following DVT. However, the evidence was downgraded due to significant heterogeneity among studies and unclear or absent blinding in clinical assessments. The authors concluded that large, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings [Appelen, 2017].
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section, specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Parenteral anticoagulants
- The parenteral anticoagulants licensed for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis are [BNF, 2025]:
- Low molecular weight heparins (dalteparin, enoxaparin, and tinzaparin).
- Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide that inhibits activated factor X.
- For information on prescribing a 24-hour dose of these anticoagulants, see the sections on Prescribing issues - dalteparin, Prescribing issues - enoxaparin, Prescribing issues - tinzaparin, or Prescribing issues - fondaparinux.
What should I be aware of when prescribing dalteparin?
- Dalteparin is contraindicated in people with [EMC, 2023] [BNF, 2025]:
- A history of confirmed or suspected immunologically mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (type II).
- Acute bacterial endocarditis.
- Haemophilia or other haemorrhagic disorders.
- Mechanical prosthetic heart valve.
- Major trauma, active clinically significant bleeding, or conditions with a high risk of bleeding, such as:
- Acute gastroduodenal ulcer.
- Cerebral haemorrhage.
- Known haemorrhagic diathesis.
- Recent surgery (or injury) to the central nervous system, eyes, and ears.
- Dalteparin should be used with caution in [EMC, 2023] [BNF, 2025]:
- Older people (especially 80 years and older) — increased risk for bleeding complications within the therapeutic dosage ranges.
- People with conditions with an increased risk of bleeding complications, for example:
- Following surgery or trauma.
- Severe liver or renal failure.
- Thrombocytopenia or defective platelet function.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Hypertensive or diabetic retinopathy.
- Concurrent anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment.
- Dalteparin should be administered subcutaneously.
- The recommended dosages for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in adults are [BNF, 2025]:
- Body weight less than 46 kg — 7500 units once daily.
- Body weight 46–56 kg — 10,000 units once daily.
- Body weight 57–68 kg — 12,500 units once daily.
- Body weight 69–82 kg — 15,000 units once daily.
- Body weight 83 kg and over — 18,000 units once daily.
- The recommended dosages for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in adults are [BNF, 2025]:
- For detailed information on prescribing dalteparin, see the British National Formulary and the Summary of Product Characteristics (listed in the electronic Medicines Compendium).
What should I be aware of when prescribing enoxaparin?
- Enoxaparin is contraindicated in people with [EMC, 2022a] [BNF, 2025]:
- History of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) within the past 100 days or in the presence of circulating antibodies.
- Acute bacterial endocarditis.
- Haemophilia or other haemorrhagic disorders.
- Mechanical prosthetic heart valve.
- End-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance [CrCl] less than 15 mL/minute).
- Major trauma, active clinically significant bleeding, or conditions with a high risk of bleeding, such as:
- Recent haemorrhagic stroke.
- Active gastrointestinal ulcer.
- Presence of malignant neoplasm at high risk of bleeding.
- Recent brain, spinal, or ophthalmic surgery.
- Known or suspected oesophageal varices.
- Arteriovenous malformations.
- Vascular aneurysms.
- Major intraspinal or intracerebral vascular abnormalities.
- Enoxaparin should be used with caution in [EMC, 2022a] [BNF, 2025]:
- People with a history (more than 100 days) of HIT without circulating antibodies — the decision to use enoxaparin must be made only after carefully considering risks, benefits, and non-heparin alternative treatments.
- Older people (especially 80 years and older) — may be at an increased risk of bleeding complications with therapeutic dosage ranges.
- Obesity — increased risk of thromboembolism.
- People with conditions with an increased risk of bleeding, such as:
- Impaired haemostasis.
- History of peptic ulcer.
- Recent ischemic stroke.
- Severe arterial hypertension.
- Recent diabetic retinopathy.
- Hepatic impairment.
- Severe renal impairment (CrCl 15–30 mL/minute) — a dosage adjustment is recommended.
- Low body weight (less than 45 kg in women and less than 57 kg in men) — increased risk of bleeding due to increased exposure to enoxaparin.
- Concurrent anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment — concurrent treatment should be avoided or carefully monitored.
- Enoxaparin should be administered subcutaneously.
- The recommended dosages for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in adults are [EMC, 2022a]:
- For uncomplicated people with a low risk of recurrence — 150 IU/kg (1.5 mg/kg) once daily.
- For people with risk factors such as obesity, cancer, recurrent venous thromboembolism, or proximal (vena iliaca) thrombosis — 100 IU/kg (1 mg/kg) every 12 hours.
- For people with severe renal impairment (CrCl 15–30 mL/minute) — 100 IU/kg (1 mg/kg) once daily.
- The recommended dosages for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in adults are [EMC, 2022a]:
- For detailed information on prescribing enoxaparin, see the British National Formulary and the Summary of Product Characteristics (listed in the electronic Medicines Compendium).
What should I be aware of when prescribing tinzaparin?
- Tinzaparin is contraindicated in people with [EMC, 2022b] [BNF, 2025]:
- Current or history of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (type II).
- Acute bacterial endocarditis.
- Haemophilia or other haemorrhagic disorders.
- Mechanical prosthetic heart valve.
- Major trauma, active major bleeding, or conditions with a high risk of major bleeding, such as recent haemorrhagic stroke, spinal or ophthalmic surgery, or gastrointestinal ulcer.
- Tinzaparin should be used with caution in [EMC, 2022b] [BNF, 2025]:
- Older people — more likely to have reduced renal function.
- People with conditions with an increased risk of bleeding complications, such as:
- Severe hypertension.
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/minute) — monitoring of anti-Factor Xa is recommended.
- Tinzaparin should be administered subcutaneously.
- The recommended dosage for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis is 175 units per kg once daily [EMC, 2022b].
- For detailed information on prescribing tinzaparin, see the British National Formulary and the Summary of Product Characteristics (listed in the electronic Medicines Compendium).
What issues should I be aware of when prescribing fondaparinux?
- Fondaparinux is contraindicated in people with [BNF, 2025; EMC, 2025]:
- Active clinically significant bleeding.
- Acute bacterial endocarditis.
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min) — the risk of bleeding increases with increasing renal impairment.
- Fondaparinux should be used with caution in [BNF, 2025; EMC, 2025]:
- Older people — as renal function declines with age, older people may have reduced fondaparinux elimination, leading to higher exposure and increased bleeding risk.
- People who have undergone recent surgery (less than 3 days) and only once surgical haemostasis has been established.
- People with conditions with an increased risk of bleeding complications, such as:
- Congenital or acquired bleeding disorders.
- Active ulcerative gastrointestinal disease.
- Recent intracranial haemorrhage.
- Moderate renal impairment (CrCl 30–50 mL/min).
- Severe hepatic impairment.
- People with:
- Low body weight (less than 50 kg) — limited clinical experience. Fondaparinux should be used with caution at a daily dose of 5 mg in this population.
- High body weight (over 100 kg) — limited clinical experience.
- History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) — the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux have not been formally studied in people with HIT type II.
- Latex sensitivity — the needle shield of the pre-filled syringe contains dry natural latex rubber that can potentially cause allergic reactions in latex-sensitive people.
- Fondaparinux should be administered subcutaneously.
- For detailed information on prescribing fondaparinux, see the British National Formulary and the Summary of Product Characteristics (listed in the electronic Medicines Compendium).
Oral anticoagulants
- The oral anticoagulants licensed for the treatment and prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in adults are:
- Direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban).
- Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist.
- For detailed prescribing information on oral anticoagulants, see the CKS topic on Anticoagulation - oral.
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing [NICE, 2023]. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of deep vein thrombosis.
Search dates
March 2013 - November 2019
Key search terms
The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCOhost MEDLINE (searched 12th November 2019). These were combined with filters to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and primary care relevant literature in EBSCOhost MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases.
S6 S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5
S5 AB VTE OR TI VTE
S4 AB venous thromboemboli* OR TI venous thromboemboli*
S3 AB DVT OR TI DVT
S2 AB ( venous thrombos* or vein thrombos* ) OR TI ( venous thrombos* or vein thrombos* )
S1 (MH "Venous Thrombosis+")
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Anand, S.S., Wells, P.S., Hunt, D., et al. (1998) Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? Journal of the American Medical Association 279(14), 1094-1099. [Abstract]
- Appelen, D., van Loo, E., Prins, M. H., et al. (2017) Compression therapy for prevention of post‐thrombotic syndrome (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 09. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2024) Deep vein thrombosis. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. http://bestpractice.bmj.com
- BNF (2025) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Di Nisio, M., van Es, N. and Buller. H.R. (2016) Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet 388, 3060-3073. [Abstract]
- EMC (2022a) SPC for Clexane Forte Syringes. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2022b) SPC for innohep Syringe 20,000 IU/ml Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023) SPC for Fragmin 10000 IU/1 ml solution for injection. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025) SPC for Arixtra 7.5 mg/0.6 ml solution for injection, pre-filled syringe. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Gorman, W.P., Davis, K.R. and Donnelly, R. (2000) ABC of arterial and venous disease: swollen lower limb-1: general assessment and deep vein thrombosis. BMJ 320(7247), 1453-1456.
- Heit, J.A., Spencer, F.A. and White, R.H. (2016) The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 41(1), 3-14. [Free Full-text]
- Kahn, S.R., Shaprio, S., Wells, P.S., et al. (2014) Compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 383(9920), 880-888. [Abstract]
- National Clinical Guideline Centre (2012) Venous thromboembolic disease: the management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing. Appendices A-M. National Centre for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2015) Addendum to Clinical Guideline 144, Venous thromboembolic diseases in adults: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2021) Venous thromboembolism in adults. Quality standard (QS201). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2023) Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- RCOG (2015) Thrombosis and Embolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Acute Management (Green-top Guideline No. 37b). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. http://www.rcog.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- SIGN (2014) Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- Streiff, M.B., Agnelli, G., Connors, J.M., et al. (2016) Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 41(1), 32-67. [Abstract]
- Stubbs, M.J., Mouyis, M. and Thomas, M. (2018) Deep vein thrombosis. British Medical Journal. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472180
- Tovey, C. and Wyatt, S. (2003) Diagnosis, investigation, and management of deep vein thrombosis. BMJ 326(7400), 1180-1184.