This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Skin and nail

Leg ulcer - venous

Last revised in May 2026

A leg ulcer is defined as the loss of skin below the knee on the leg or foot, which takes more than 2 weeks to heal.

Leg ulcer - venous: Summary

  • ​​​​​​A leg ulcer is a break in the skin below the knee which has not healed within 2 weeks.
  • A venous leg ulcer occurs in the presence of venous disease and is the most common type of leg ulcer, accounting for 60–80% of cases. It typically occurs in the gaiter area of the leg (from the ankle to mid-calf).
    • Other causes of leg ulceration and/or delayed wound healing include arterial disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, sickle cell disease, malignancy, and medications. 
  • Venous leg ulceration is caused by sustained venous hypertension, which results from chronic venous insufficiency due to venous valve incompetence or an impaired calf muscle pump.
  • Risk factors include obesity, immobility, increasing age, varicose veins, and a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). 
  • The estimated prevalence of venous leg ulcers in the UK is between 0.1–0.3%, increasing with age. 
  • Complications include chronic pain, infection, contact dermatitis and a negative impact on quality of life and daily functioning.
  • There is a wide variation in published healing and recurrence rates of venous leg ulcers:
    • Six-month healing rates have been reported as 45% for people treated in the community, and 70% for people treated in specialist clinics.
    • Twelve-month recurrence rates range between 26–69%. 
    • Repeat cycles of ulceration, healing, and recurrence are common.
  • Assessment of a person with a venous leg ulcer should include: 
    • Asking about the symptoms experienced (type, duration, and severity).
    • Identifying risk factors, such as immobility and a history of DVT. 
    • Examining the wound (site, edge, size, depth, wound bed, and for signs of infection). 
    • Examining the legs (for oedema, varicose veins, venous skin changes, and reduced ankle mobility). 
    • Assessing for other causes of ulceration and/or delayed wound healing.
    • Measuring the ankle-brachial pressure index in both legs to exclude arterial insufficiency.
  • Primary care management includes: 
    • Cleaning and dressing the wound. 
    • Starting compression therapy if appropriate. 
    • Considering prescribing pentoxifylline to increase microcirculatory blood flow and improve ulcer healing.
    • Managing associated conditions, such as oedema and venous eczema.
    • Managing complications, such as pain and infection.
    • Providing information and lifestyle advice to promote ulcer healing and reduce the risk of recurrence, for example encouraging compliance with compression therapy, keeping mobile with regular walking (to exercise calf muscle pump function), elevating legs when immobile, avoiding leg trauma, and using emollient frequently. 
    • Arranging follow up to reassess the ulcer. 
    • Arranging specialist referral where appropriate, for example if there is an uncertain diagnosis or a suspected alternative cause of ulceration, or if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of adequate treatment.
  • To reduce the risk of recurrence after the leg ulcer has healed:
    • Long-term use of below-knee graduated compression hosiery is recommended.
    • Lifestyle measures should be encouraged.
    • The person should be reviewed appropriately.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 18 years onwards.

This CKS topic covers the assessment and management of venous leg ulcers in primary care. It also covers the prevention of recurrence after a venous leg ulcer has healed.

This CKS topic does not make specific recommendations on dressings as there are many different types available and selection requires training and expertise in wound care. The wound management section of the British National Formulary (BNF) provides information on the types and properties of different dressings, and a table that suggests choices of primary dressing depending on the nature of the wound. 

This CKS topic does not give detailed recommendations on the application of compression bandaging as this should always be done by a healthcare professional trained in venous ulcer management. 

This CKS topic does not cover the management of arterial leg ulcers, mixed arterial and venous ulcers, or ulcers caused by other aetiological factors (such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, pressure, drugs, or malignancy), although indications for referral are considered. 

There are separate CKS topics on Compression stockings, Dermatitis - contact, Diabetes - type 1, Diabetes - type 2, Palliative care - malignant skin ulcer, Peripheral arterial disease, Rheumatoid arthritis, Skin cancers - recognition and referral, Thrombophlebitis - superficial, Varicose veins, and Venous eczema and lipodermatosclerosis. 

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

May 2026 — minor update. ABPI thresholds and use of compression hosiery made consistent with the updated compression stockings topic and associated guidance.

Previous changes

October 2025 — minor update. Added information on drug interaction between rifampicin and doxycycline.

October 2024 — minor update.  The section on interpretation of ABPI has been removed from this topic and a link added to the topic on Peripheral arterial disease. 

August 2024 — reviewed.  A literature search was conducted in July 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to align the topic with recommendations provided in updated literature sources.

August 2024 — minor update. Adverse effects of co-amoxiclav updated in line with manufacturer's SPC.

May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contra-indicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

March 2024 — minor update. Adverse effects of doxycycline updated in line with manufacturer's SPC. 

December 2023 — minor update. Update to drug interactions section for erythromycin to include information on interactions with lomitapide and corticosteroids, in line with the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

November 2023 — minor update. Interactions section for flucloxacillin updated in line with updated manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.

July 2023 — minor update. The summary of manufacturer’s product characteristics for clarithromycin was updated to include a warning regarding concomitant treatment with domperidone (due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias).

May 2023 — minor update. Added potential adverse effects of co-amoxiclav to include Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can result in myocardial infarction), aseptic meningitis, linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA), and drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (all of unknown frequency). These adverse effects were noted in an update to the manufacturer’s summary of product characteristics.

August 2021 — minor update. Adverse effects of co-trimoxazole updated in line with revised manufacturer's SPC relating to the rare problem of severe respiratory toxicity with the potential to progress to Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

January 2021 — minor update. Contraindications and drug interactions for erythromycin have been updated in line with an MHRA drug safety update. 

October 2020 — minor update. A typographical error has been corrected.

February 2020 — minor update. Topic updated in line with NICE guideline, NG152 Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].

July 2019 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in June 2019 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The recommendations on managing an infected leg ulcer have been changed in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Draft guideline on leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2019]. The scope of the topic has been clarified, and the topic has been restructured. 

April 2017 — minor update. Update to incorporate feedback from the Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine.

October to November 2015 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2015 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last version of this topic. 

  • A recommendation to consider prescribing pentoxifylline to improve ulcer-healing rates has been added to reflect clinical guidance in the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010] and a Cochrane systematic review [July, 2015].
  • The definition of leg ulcer has been updated, in line with the NICE guideline Varicose veins in the legs: The diagnosis and management of varicose veins [NICE, 2013].
  • A recommendation to refer people with venous leg ulcer for specialist advice after two weeks of primary care treatment was added, in line with the NICE guideline Varicose veins in the legs: The diagnosis and management of varicose veins [NICE, 2013].
  • The recommendation to consider prescribing erythromycin for infected leg ulcer has been removed in line with current prescribing guidelines and good clinical practice. 
  • The topic has undergone minor restructuring, and prescribing information sections for the recommended antibiotics have been added.

July 2015 — minor update. The information on the concurrent use of clarithromycin or erythromycin with statins has been clarified.

April 2015 — minor update. Link inserted to the CKS topic on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain.

September 2012 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2012 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

June 2012 — minor update. Minor typographical error corrected. 

March 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics — no changes to clinical recommendations have been made. 

September 2010 — minor update. Text updated to include recommendations from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers.

December 2008 — minor update. Rewording of text regarding prescribing erythromycin or clarithromycin for people with penicillin allergy.

November 2007 to February 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations. 

January 2007 — antibiotic prescriptions for infected leg ulcers updated. 

November 2005 — minor technical update. 

August 2004 — written. Validated in September 2004 and issued in November 2004.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 July 2024.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

Economic Appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 July 2024.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 July 2024.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 July 2024.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 July 2024.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 July 2024.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 July 2024.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Make a diagnosis of a venous leg ulcer.
  • Manage a venous leg ulcer.
  • Manage associated conditions (such as oedema and venous eczema).
  • Manage complications of the ulcer (such as pain and infection).
  • Provide self-care advice to a person with a venous leg ulcer. 
  • Reduce the risk of recurrence of venous leg ulcer.
  • Recognize when to refer a person with a venous leg ulcer to a specialist. 

Outcome measures

 No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is it?

  • A leg ulcer is a break in the skin below the knee which has not healed within 2 weeks [NICE, 2013; PCDS, 2023].
  • A venous leg ulcer occurs in the presence of venous disease and is the most common type of leg ulcer, accounting for 60–80% of cases [SIGN, 2010; Alavi, 2016; Singer, 2017; PCDS, 2023]. It typically occurs in the gaiter area of the leg (from the ankle to mid-calf) [Grey, 2021a].
    • Other causes of leg ulceration and/or delayed wound healing include arterial disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, sickle cell disease, malignancy, and medications (such as nicorandil, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). See the section on Differential diagnosis for more information.

What are the causes and risk factors?

  • Venous leg ulceration is caused by sustained venous hypertension, which results from chronic venous insufficiency due to venous valve incompetence or an impaired calf muscle pump [SIGN, 2010; Vivas, 2016; DermNet NZ, 2018; Lim, 2018; Wounds UK, 2019; Grey, 2021a; PCDS, 2023].
    • In the normal venous system, venous pressure decreases with exercise as a result of the action of the calf muscle pump. When the calf muscles relax, the valves in the perforating veins (which connect the superficial veins to the deep veins) prevent reflux of blood and the pressure remains low.
    • If there is reflux of blood due to valve damage or calf muscle pump impairment, the venous pressure remains high, resulting in enlarged veins, oedema, and venous skin changes (hyperpigmentation, venous eczema, lipodermatosclerosis, and atrophie blanche). As the condition of the skin and subcutaneous tissue worsens, it becomes increasingly vulnerable to ulceration.
  • Risk factors for developing venous leg ulcers include [SIGN, 2010; Franks, 2016; Singer, 2017; Guest, 2018; HSE, 2018; Lim, 2018; Grey, 2021a]:
    • Increasing age.
    • Obesity.
    • Immobility.
    • Limited range of ankle function.
    • Previous ulcer.
    • Personal or family history of varicose veins.
    • Personal history of deep vein thrombosis.
    • Female sex.
    • Pregnancy — with a higher number of pregnancies increasing the risk.
    • Arteriovenous fistula.
    • History of leg fracture or trauma.
    • Sedentary lifestyle.
    • Prolonged standing.
  • Dual or multiple aetiologies may coexist, particularly among the elderly [Grey, 2021a].

How common is it?

  • Venous leg ulcers are the most common type of leg ulcers, accounting for 60–80% of cases [SIGN, 2010; PCDS, 2023].
    • The estimated prevalence in the UK is between 0.1–0.3% [SIGN, 2010], and this increases with age. The prevalence is predicted to increase with an ageing demographic, often with multiple comorbidities [Franks, 2016].
    • The estimated lifetime risk of developing a venous leg ulcer is 1% [SIGN, 2010; Lim, 2018; Grey, 2021a].
  • Venous leg ulcers occur in people from all socioeconomic groups, but ulcers take longer to heal and recurrence rates are higher in people from lower socioeconomic groups [SIGN, 2010].

What are the complications?

  • Complications of venous leg ulcers include [SIGN, 2010; Alavi, 2016; Guest, 2018; Tate, 2018; Wounds UK, 2019; PCDS, 2023]:
    • Chronic pain.
    • Impaired mobility (often due to pain).
    • Infection, including osteomyelitis and septicaemia.
    • Allergic contact dermatitis (caused by allergens in creams and dressings, such as preservatives, emulsifiers, latex, resins, lanolin, and topical steroids, antibiotics, and antiseptics).
    • Eczematous changes — can be improved with the use of an appropriate topical treatment; where this persists consider the possibility of allergic contact dermatitis.
    • Hypergranulation of the ulcer bed.
    • Malignant transformation in the ulcer bed (Marjolin's ulcer).
    • Sinus formation and fistula (uncommon).
    • Negative impacts on quality of life and daily functioning — time off work, psychological distress, loss of independence, and social isolation are common.
  • Treatment of venous leg ulcers results in considerable cost to the NHS. In retrospective cohort analyses of people in the UK primary care The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database:
    • The estimated annual cost of managing confirmed venous leg ulcers was between £500–£900 million, using 2013/2014 prices [Guest, 2017]. 
    • The average NHS cost of wound care over 12 months was an estimated £7600 per venous leg ulcer (using 2015/2016 prices), with the cost of managing an unhealed ulcer being 4–5 times more than that of managing a healed ulcer (£3000 per healed compared with £13,500 per unhealed venous leg ulcer) [Guest, 2018].

What is the prognosis?

  • There is a wide variation in published healing and recurrence rates of venous leg ulcers:
    • Six-month healing rates have been reported as 45% for those treated in the community (about 80% of people with venous leg ulcers), and 70% for those treated in specialist clinics [SIGN, 2010].
    • Twelve-month recurrence rates range between 26 and 69% [SIGN, 2010; Lim, 2018; de Moraes Silva, 2024]. In a retrospective cohort analysis of 505 people in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database, 53% of all venous leg ulcers healed within 12 months, with an average healing time of 3 months [Guest, 2018].
    • Repeat cycles of ulceration, healing, and recurrence are common [SIGN, 2010; de Moraes Silva, 2024].
    • Recurrence can be improved by adherence to preventative treatment approaches [Grey, 2021a].
  • Poor prognostic factors include [Vasudevan, 2014; Guest, 2018]: 
    • Wound duration of more than 1 year — recurrence rate in these ulcers is more than 70% [Vasudevan, 2014]. 
    • Larger wounds.
    • History of surgical treatment of varicose veins. 
    • Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) of less than 0.8. 
    • Impaired calf muscle pump — this reduces ulcer healing rates [Lattimer, 2018].
    • Fibrin in more than 50% of wound surface [Vasudevan, 2014]. 
    • Being from a lower socioeconomic group — ulcers take longer to heal and recurrence rates are higher in people from lower socioeconomic groups [SIGN, 2010].
    • Poor compliance with treatment and lifestyle advice. 

Diagnosis of venous leg ulcer

How should I assess a person with a suspected venous leg ulcer?

  • Take a history.
    • Ask about:
      • The duration of the ulcer.
      • Symptoms of venous insufficiency, such as pain, heaviness, aching, swelling, and itching of the affected leg. Symptoms are typically worse at the end of the day and are relieved by leg elevation. 
      • Risk factors for venous leg ulcers, such as immobility or a history of deep vein thrombosis.
      • Other possible causes of ulceration and/or delayed wound healing, including comorbidities (such as diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis) and the use of certain medications (such as nicorandil, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulants).
      • How symptoms are affecting the person's daily functioning, quality of life, and overall health.
      • A history of allergy, for example to latex or lanolin. This is useful for when the choice of appropriate dressing is being considered. 
  • Examine the person.
    • Assess the ulcer. Record the following details about the ulcer (take photographs if possible and appropriate) to aid diagnosis, guide referral, and help assess ulcer healing:
      • Site — venous leg ulcers typically occur in the gaiter area of the leg (ankle to mid-calf). Assess and note the position of the ulcer (medial, lateral, anterior, posterior, or a combination).
      • Wound edge — venous leg ulcers typically have gently sloping, irregular edges. 'Punched out', rolled, or everted edges should raise the suspicion of an alternative diagnosis.
      • Size — assess the size of the wound at first presentation and regularly thereafter. Trace out the outline of the wound margin on to transparent acetate sheets and estimate the surface area.
      • Depth — take approximate measurements of the greatest depth of the ulcer to assess progress, noting any exposed underlying structures (bone or tendon).
      • Appearance of the wound bed — look for granulation tissue (an indicator of wound healing), and slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in colour) or necrotic tissue, which may need to be removed to allow healing. 
      • Amount of exudate — excessive exudate may be due to wound infection or gross oedema in the wound area. The amount of exudate will help determine which dressing is needed.
    • Assess for signs of infection — look for cellulitis (characterized by pain, warmth, swelling, and erythema of the infected area), fever, increased pain, rapid extension of the area of ulceration, malodour, and increased exudate.
    • Examine both legs for signs of venous insufficiency, including:
      • Pitting oedema — rule out non-venous causes of oedema, such as heart failure and chronic kidney disease. See the CKS topics on Heart failure - chronic and Chronic kidney disease.
      • Skin changes — look for hyperpigmentation (brown-red discolouration caused by haemosiderin deposition), venous eczema (itchy, red, scaly, and/or flaky skin which may have blisters and crusts on the surface), lipodermatosclerosis (painful, hardened, tight skin), and atrophie blanche (star-shaped, ivory-white, depressed, atrophic scars with surrounding pigmentation). See the CKS topic on Venous eczema and lipodermatosclerosis for more information.
    • Examine the person (lying and standing) for evidence of varicose veins. See the CKS topic on Varicose veins for more information.
    • Check joint mobility, particularly that of the ankle, which is an important component of calf muscle pump function.
    • Assess for peripheral arterial disease, which may coexist with venous ulceration.
      • Look for hair loss, pallor, coldness on palpation, and dusky appearance on lowering the leg.
      • Assess capillary refill — greater than 4 seconds is suggestive of arterial insufficiency. 
      • Check peripheral pulses (femoral, popliteal, pedal) and also the abdomen for any signs of an abdominal aneurysm. 
      • See the CKS topic on Peripheral arterial disease for more information. 
  • Arrange investigations.
    • Arrange a Doppler assessment of both legs to determine the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) to exclude arterial insufficiency. See the section on Assessment in the CKS topic on Peripheral arterial disease for more information. 
    • Consider the need for additional investigations, such as:  
      • Full blood count — presence of anaemia may delay healing; high white blood cell count and platelet count may indicate infection. 
      • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) — markers for inflammation and infection. 
      • Urea and creatinine — high urea levels may indicate dehydration, which may impair healing. 
      • Albumin — low albumin may be associated with protein loss and malnutrition, which may delay healing. 
      • HbA1c — to assess for diabetes mellitus. 
      • Other investigations to rule out other possible causes of ulceration and delayed wound healing.
    • Bacteriological swabs should only be taken where there is clinical evidence of infection. See the section on Managing infection for more information.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Health Service Executive (HSE) guideline HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], and expert opinion in narrative review articles  [Vivas, 2016; Singer, 2017; Lim, 2018; Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019; Bowers, 2020] and a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Grey, 2021a; Grey, 2021b]. 

Causes of leg ulcers

  • Vascular disease, both venous and arterial, is the most common cause of leg ulcers. Other causes include diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatological diseases, pressure, and malignancy [Franks, 2016; HSE, 2018; Lim, 2018; PCDS, 2023].

Leg ulcer assessments

  • A thorough assessment (history, examination, and investigation) of a person with a leg ulcer will help identify underlying causes as well as any associated comorbidities and risk factors, all of which will influence management decisions [Franks, 2016; HSE, 2018; Lim, 2018; Wounds UK, 2019; PCDS, 2023].
    • About 95% of venous ulcers occur in the gaiter area of the leg, characteristically around the malleoli. Ulcers occurring above the mid-calf or on the foot are likely to have other origins [Grey, 2021a].
    • Examination of the edge of the wound may help to identify its aetiology. For example, venous leg ulcers generally have gently sloping edges; arterial ulcers often appear well demarcated and 'punched out'; and rolled or everted edges should raise the suspicion of malignancy [Grey, 2021a; Grey, 2021b].
    • Serial measurement of the surface area of the ulcer is important as it is a reliable index of ulcer healing [SIGN, 2010].
    • Assessing the depth of the ulcer is important as deep ulcers involving deep fascia, tendon, periosteum, or bone may have an arterial component [SIGN, 2010]. Bone at the base of a wound may suggest a protracted healing time and the possibility of underlying osteomyelitis [Grey, 2021a].
  • Classic signs of venous hypertension include oedema, hemosiderin staining, and lipodermatosclerosis [Bowers, 2020].
  • Other findings suggestive of venous ulcers include telangiectasias (dilated or broken blood vessels located near the surface of the skin), corona phlebectatica (abnormally dilated veins around the ankle and foot), atrophie blanche (atrophic, white scarring), lipodermatosclerosis, and inverted champagne-bottle deformity of the lower leg [Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019].
  • Non-invasive imaging with comprehensive venous duplex ultrasonography, arterial pulse examination, and measurement of ankle-brachial index is recommended for all patients with suspected venous ulcers [Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019].

What else might it be?

  • Exclude the following conditions in the initial assessment of a person with a suspected venous leg ulcer:
    • Peripheral arterial disease — ulcers due to arterial disease often appear well demarcated and have a 'punched out' appearance. There may be signs of arterial compromise, such as pallor, loss of hair, nail dystrophy, coldness, and diminished capillary refill. A history of intermittent claudication, cardiovascular disease, or stroke may indicate the presence of arterial disease. See the CKS topic on Peripheral arterial disease for more information.
    • Rheumatoid arthritis — rheumatoid ulcers may be venous, arterial, or vasculitic. Vasculitic ulcers can occur on the calf or dorsum of the foot and are typically deep and well demarcated with a 'punched out' appearance. People with vasculitic ulcers will have clinical features of established disease which may be associated with systemic vasculitis. See the CKS topic on Rheumatoid arthritis for more information.
    • Systemic vasculitis — people with systemic vasculitis often develop multiple leg ulcers that are necrotic and deep. There is usually an atypical distribution and evidence of vasculitic lesions elsewhere (for example nail-fold infarcts and splinter haemorrhages). Associated conditions include systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, polyarteritis nodosa, and granulomatosis with polyangitis (previously known as Wegener's granulomatosis). 
    • Diabetes mellitus — diabetic ulcers may be venous, arterial, or neuropathic. Neuropathic ulcers typically develop under calluses or over pressure points, such as metatarsal heads, sole of foot, and balls of toes. They are often irregular and correspond to the shape of the pressure point that has become exposed. The edge and base are often clean and may be deep, with exposure of bone and tendon. People with diabetes may also have diabetic bullae or necrobiosis lipoidica, both of which can ulcerate. 
    • Malignancy — malignant ulcers often occur in sun exposed areas. The ulcer edge may be rolled (basal cell carcinoma) or everted (squamous cell carcinoma). Malignancy should be considered if the ulcer does not respond to medical treatment or if the appearance is unusual. See the CKS topic on Skin cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • Other types of lower limb ulcers include:
    • Pressure ulcers — caused by unrelieved pressure over bony prominences, such as the malleolus or the heel. Prolonged compression of the tissues, along with friction and shear, results in local tissue ischaemia, necrosis, and ulcer formation.
    • Drug/treatment-induced ulcers — certain drugs/treatments can:
      • Cause ulceration, for example nicorandil, hydroxycarbamide, and radiotherapy.
      • Delay wound healing, for example hydroxycarbamide, immunosuppressive drugs, antipsychotics, beta-blockers, nicorandil, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anticoagulants, and radiotherapy.
      • Increase oedema, for example calcium channel blockers (such as amlodipine) and NSAIDs. 
      • Affect surrounding skin, for example systemic and topical corticosteroids, and radiotherapy.
    • Others — tropical ulcers, tuberculosis ulcers, syphilitic ulcers, and ulcers caused by sarcoidosis, pyoderma gangrenosum, livedoid vasculopathy, cutaneous necrosis, sickle cell disease, and dermatitis artefacta (factitious self-wounding). See the CKS topics on Tuberculosis, Sickle cell disease, and Syphilis for more information.

Basis for recommendation

The information on the differential diagnoses of venous leg ulcer is based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], and expert opinion in review articles [Vivas, 2016; Singer, 2017; Lim, 2018; Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019] and a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Grey, 2021a; Grey, 2021b; Patel, 2021]. 

Management

Scenario: Venous leg ulcers

From age 18 years onwards.

Overview of management of a person with a venous leg ulcer

  • Assess the need for immediate referral. See the section on Referral for more information.
  • If immediate referral is not indicated:
    • Ensure that compression therapy is started immediately if appropriate. See the section on Compression therapy for more information.
      • The ulcer should be cleaned and dressed appropriately before compression is applied. See the section on Cleaning and dressing the ulcer for more information.
      • Compression should only be applied by trained healthcare professionals and in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
    • Consider prescribing pentoxifylline, depending on local prescribing policies, to aid ulcer healing.
      • Pentoxifylline is an effective adjunct to compression therapy for treating venous leg ulcers (off-label indication) and may be effective in the absence of compression.
      • The recommended dosage is 400 mg three times daily for up to 6 months, depending on local prescribing policies.
      • See the prescribing information for Pentoxifylline for more information.
    • Assess for (and manage):
    • Provide information and lifestyle advice to promote ulcer healing and reduce the risk of recurrence, and sources of further information. See the section on Information and advice for more information.
    • Review the person appropriately. See the section on Follow up for more information.
  • After a venous leg ulcer has healed, offer below-knee graduated compression stockings to prevent recurrence of ulceration. See the section on Preventing recurrence for more information.

Basis for recommendation

This information is largely based on the Wounds UK guidance Compression hosiery for the prevention of recurrent leg ulceration: Evidence, efficacy and best practice [Wounds UK, 2025], the National Wound Care Strategy Programme consensus document Recommendations for lower limb ulcers [NWCSP, 2020], the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) HealthTech guidance Compression products for treating venous leg ulcers: late-stage assessment [NICE, 2025], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], and expert opinion in a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Price, 2021]. 

Mechanism and efficacy of pentoxifylline
  • Pentoxifylline is believed to increase microcirculatory blood flow although the exact mechanism of action is unknown [SIGN, 2010]. 
  • Evidence from a Cochrane systematic review (search date: July 2012) showed that pentoxifylline [Jull, 2012]: 
    • Is more effective than placebo in terms of complete ulcer healing or significant improvement (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.24).
    • Plus compression is more effective than placebo plus compression (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.13). 
    • In the absence of compression, appears to be more effective than placebo or no treatment (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.39).
  • The authors of the Cochrane systematic review concluded that pentoxifylline is an effective adjunct to compression bandaging for treating venous ulcers and may be effective in the absence of compression [Jull, 2012].
  • The National Wound Care Strategy Programme consensus document states that although compression therapy is the mainstay of venous ulcer treatment, pentoxifylline may also be considered when venous ulcers remain unhealed, or people are unsuitable for compression therapy [NWCSP, 2020]. However, caution is needed when making prescribing decisions as many people with venous leg ulcers may already use polypharmacy and gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, indigestion, and diarrhoea) are a known adverse event in some patients
Dose of pentoxifylline
  • The recommended dosage is based on the SIGN guideline, which is in line with advice in the BNF [BNF, 2024]. 

When should I refer a person with a venous leg ulcer?

  • Refer to a specialist if: 
    • There is diagnostic uncertainty — refer for specialist vascular assessment (to a leg ulcer clinic, tissue viability clinic, or a vascular specialist depending on clinical judgement and availability) or to dermatology.
    • The ulcer is rapidly deteriorating or has an atypical location (outside the gaiter area) and/or appearance — refer to dermatology for a possible skin biopsy. 
    • There is a suspected alternative cause of ulceration, such as: 
      • Arterial or mixed venous/arterial disease — refer people with an ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) outside the normal range. For more information, see the section on Assessment in the CKS topic Peripheral arterial disease.  
      • Malignancy — refer to dermatology using the urgent suspected cancer pathway referral. See the CKS topic on Skin cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
      • Diabetes mellitus — refer to the diabetes ulcer clinic.
      • Rheumatoid arthritis or systemic vasculitis — refer to rheumatology. 
    • The person has poor ankle mobility, reduced joint function, or a history of falls. 
    • There is suspected iliac vein stenosis — these people may need investigation by CT venography and intravenous ultrasound.
  • After compression therapy is initiated, arrange specialist referral if:
    • There is a complication related to the ulcer or the treatment, including:
      • Suspected contact dermatitis — refer to dermatology for consideration of patch testing. 
      • Osteomyelitis (suggested by fever, disproportionate pain, local malodour, non-healing sinus, and oedema around wound) — arrange urgent hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. 
      • Sepsis (suggested by tachycardia, fever, and chills) — arrange urgent hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics.  
      • Necrotising fasciitis (suggested by disproportionate pain and tenderness, dusky-violaceous areas along with erythema, crepitus, blisters, and necrosis) — arrange urgent hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. 
      • Uncontrolled pain — refer to a specialist pain team.
    • There is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy — refer to a vascular specialist or dermatologist depending on clinical judgement.
    • There are difficulties with adequately controlling any underlying pathologies.
  • If the ulcer is recurrent, refer to a vascular specialist for consideration for superficial venous surgery.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are largely based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Health Service Executive (HSE) guideline HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], and review articles [Alavi, 2016; Vivas, 2016; Singer, 2017].

Referral if there is delayed or no healing
  • The active management of leg ulcers may be required over many months or years [SIGN, 2010; Wounds UK, 2019]. However, once adequate treatment has been initiated, a venous leg ulcer should show some signs of progression within 2–4 weeks [HSE, 2018].
  • The recommendation to refer if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy is extrapolated from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Varicose veins: Diagnosis and management [NICE, 2013]. 
    • NICE recommends early referral (within 2 weeks) to a vascular service, where a full clinical and duplex Doppler ultrasound assessment as well as a full range of treatments can be provided.
    • The NICE guideline development group highlighted that the location of this service can be decided locally, with some of the service being delivered in primary care where skills and equipment are available.
    • Based on this, CKS recommends referring to a vascular specialist or dermatologist (depending on clinical judgement) if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy, which should be applied by a healthcare professional trained in venous ulcer management (such as a district nurse or tissue viability nurse).
  • SIGN recommends specialist referral at an early stage of management for people with a non-healing ulcer [SIGN, 2010].
Specialist referral
  • The PCDS recommends that most people should be directed to community leg ulcer (tissue viability) clinics or dermatology departments, but people with ulcers suspected to be of arterial or mixed aetiology should be referred to a vascular surgeon, and people with diabetic ulcers should be referred to a diabetes clinic [PCDS, 2023].
  • The PCDS also recommends (dependent on local resources) that younger people who have developed leg ulcers may also benefit from referral to a vascular surgeon to assess whether surgical intervention would reduce the risk of re-ulceration [PCDS, 2023].

People with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic vasculitis

  • SIGN recommends specialist referral at an early stage of management for people with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic vasculitis [SIGN, 2010].
  • The PCDS advises that people with rheumatoid arthritis should be referred to a specialist because Dopplers may give falsely high readings, there is often additional small vessel disease, and the long-term medications used for treating rheumatoid arthritis can delay ulcer healing [PCDS, 2023].

How should a venous leg ulcer be cleaned and dressed?

A healthcare professional with expertise in wound management (such as a district nurse or tissue viability nurse) should be involved in the cleaning and dressing of a venous leg ulcer. 

  • Ensure that the ulcerated leg is washed normally in tap water and carefully dried.
    • A strict aseptic technique is not required, as the aim is not to remove surface bacteria but rather to avoid cross-infection from contamination. 
    • Debridement of slough or necrotic tissue from the wound surface may facilitate wound healing. 
  • Ensure that simple non-adherent dressings are used in the management of venous leg ulcers. 
    • The choice of dressing should be based on factors such as the properties of the wound (location, size, depth, exudate level, presence of infection), the stage of the healing process, the condition of the surrounding skin, the person's preference or tolerance (including allergies and concurrent medical conditions), and cost.
      • The Wound management products and elasticated garments section of the BNF provides information on the types and properties of different dressings, and lists the choices of primary dressing depending on the nature of the wound.
      • Antimicrobial dressings (for example, silver, iodine, or honey dressings) should not be used routinely. 
      • There is inadequate evidence to support regular application of topical antimicrobials or antiseptics.
    • The frequency of dressing changes depends on the exudate volume and the stage of ulcer healing. 
      • Once compression therapy has begun, dressing changes should lessen as exudate reduces. Dressing changes may only be needed weekly; the frequency should be tailored so that the dressing is neither oversaturated nor dry and is not adherent to the wound when it is removed.
      • Dressings are typically used continually until the wound has healed. Occasionally, they may be used after healing to protect fragile scar tissue.
    • The minimum quantity of dressings necessary to meet the person's needs should be provided to avoid wastage and stockpiling.
  • If there is pain at dressing changes:
    • Ensure an appropriate dressing is used and that the frequency of dressing changes is minimized.
    • Advise the person to take a simple analgesia (such as paracetamol with or without codeine) at least 30 minutes before a dressing change, where possible. 
    • Manage neuropathic pain if present. See the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment for more information.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline on Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the National Institute for Health and Care (NICE) guideline Chronic wounds: advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings [NICE, 2016], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019],a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Medical Technologies Guideline (NICE MTG) UrgoStart for treating diabetic foot ulcers and leg ulcers [NICE, 2023], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2024], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews [Gethin, 2015; Norman, 2018; Fernandez, 2022], and expert opinion in review articles [Alavi, 2016; Lim, 2018; Tate, 2018; Bowers, 2020] and a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Holloway, 2021]. 

Cleaning the wound
  • SIGN advises that ulcerated legs should be washed normally in tap water and carefully dried. This recommendation was based on the clinical experience of the SIGN guideline development group (GDG) [SIGN, 2010].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date: May 2021) found that evidence from randomized clinical trials indicates that using tap water compared with no cleansing may make little or no difference to wound healing, while there are no data on wound infection. The systematic review also found that the evidence was uncertain regarding the impact of using tap water compared with saline for wound cleansing on infection, wound healing, reduction in wound size and patient satisfaction. The authors concluded that due to evidence uncertainties, people with wounds and their healthcare professionals should consider factors such as patient preference and availability of treatments when choosing a method of wound cleansing [Fernandez, 2022].
Debridement
  • Removal of necrotic tissue by debridement has been used to expedite wound healing [Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019].
  • There are six methods of debridement [Franks, 2016]:
    • Surgical — using an instrument (such as a scalpel or curette) with anaesthesia.
    • Sharp — using an instrument (such as a scalpel or curette) without anaesthesia (usually done at the bed side).
    • Mechanical debridement — using washing solutions and dressings.
    • Biosurgical debridement — using larval therapy (maggots).
    • Enzymatic debridement — using enzymes to break down tissue.
    • Autolytic debridement — using moist dressings and/or natural agents to stimulate the wound’s own healing processes.
  • Although routine debridement is not supported by randomized trials, it is thought that removal of debris, slough, or necrotic tissue from the wound surface may facilitate wound healing [Alavi, 2016; Lim, 2018].
  • SIGN did not identify any studies that compared debridement with no debridement in the management of venous leg ulcers. However, the SIGN GDG recommends, based on extrapolated evidence, that sharp debridement should only be carried out by appropriately trained healthcare professionals [SIGN, 2010]. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) included in the SIGN guideline found that larval therapy significantly reduced the time to debridement of sloughy and/or necrotic leg ulcers (chronic venous and mixed venous/arterial) compared with hydrogel; however, larval therapy did not significantly increase the rate of healing of the ulcers [Dumville, 2009].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date: February 2015) found limited evidence (from small studies of short duration) that regular medical and surgical debridement of venous leg ulcers improves healing of ulcers. Moderate-quality evidence showed that sloughy ulcers with more than 50% of dead tissue debrided are more likely to heal [Gethin, 2015].
Dressing the wound
  • Wound dressings aid healing, improve comfort, and control exudate. Their role in maintaining a moist environment (the ideal condition for wound healing in the absence of gangrene) facilitates autolytic debridement and promotes healing [Franks, 2016; Tate, 2018; Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019; Bowers, 2020; Holloway, 2021].
  • SIGN identified a systematic review that compared simple non-adherent dressings with alginate dressings, hydrocolloids, hydrogels, and foams [SIGN, 2010]. 
    • No evidence was identified to support superiority of any dressing type over another when applied under appropriate multilayer bandaging, and no evidence was identified on the effectiveness of different dressings in people unable to tolerate multilayer bandaging. 
    • Based on the lack of evidence to support the superiority of any dressing type over another, SIGN recommends simple non‑adherent dressings for treating venous leg ulcers.
  • The NICE evidence summary on Advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings for managing common chronic wounds highlights the relative lack of robust clinical- or cost-effectiveness evidence to support superiority of any dressing type over another [NICE, 2016].
  • CKS does not make specific recommendations on dressings as there are many different types available and selection requires training and expertise in wound care. 
    • The correct dressing for wound management depends not only on the type of wound but also on the stage of the healing process.  The ideal dressing for moist wound healing needs to ensure that the wound remains: moist with exudate, but not macerated; free of clinical infection and excessive slough; free of toxic chemicals, particles or fibres; at the optimum temperature for healing; undisturbed by the need for frequent changes; at the optimum pH value [BNF, 2024].
    • The Wound management products and elasticated garments section of the BNF provides information on the types and properties of different dressings, and lists the choices of primary dressing depending on the nature of the wound [BNF, 2024].
    • The PCDS has a Wound-dressing guide [PCDS, 2023].
  • The information on the frequency of dressing change is based on expert opinion in the NICE guideline [NICE, 2016] and in a review article [Lim, 2018].
  • Potential adverse effects of dressings include damage to surrounding skin by pooling of exudate, allergy or adhesive elements causing trauma on removal [Holloway, 2021].
  • Although CKS makes no specific recommendations on dressings, CKS are aware of a NICE Medical Technologies Guideline which recommends UrgoStart as a cost saving option to treat venous leg ulcers [NICE, 2023].
    • UrgoStart is an interactive dressing which consists of a layer of open-weave polyester mesh impregnated with hydrocolloid polymers within a petroleum jelly known as technology lipido-colloid (TLC). It also contains nano-oligosaccharide factor (NOSF) and has an absorbent pad and a semi-permeable backing.
    • The TLC-NOSF layer is intended to create a moist protective wound healing environment, while the NOSF is intended to inhibit protease activity, specifically matrix metalloproteinases, and accelerate healing.
    • More information about UrgoStart, including the evidence on clinical efficacy and health economics, can be found here.
Topical antimicrobials and antiseptics
  • SIGN examined studies on dressings incorporating topical antimicrobials and antiseptics in the context of routine venous leg ulcer care [SIGN, 2010]. 
    • There was insufficient consistent evidence on which to base a recommendation for cadexomer iodine, povidone-iodine, mupirocin, peroxide, and topical phenytoin. 
    • Based on this, SIGN does not recommend routine long-term use of topical antiseptics or antimicrobials in the management of venous leg ulcers.
  • A Cochrane systematic review and network meta-analysis (search date: March 2017) assessed the effects of dressings and topical treatments (cadexomer-iodine paste, collagenase-containing ointment, hydrogels, topical phenytoin, and silver sulfadiazine cream) for healing venous leg ulcers.  Although there was moderate certainty evidence that silver dressings may increase the probability of venous leg ulcer healing when compared with nonadherent dressings, this result requires cautious interpretation as the network meta-analysis as a whole was assessed to be of low certainty. The authors concluded that more research is needed to determine whether particular dressings or topical treatment improve the probability of healing of venous leg ulcers [Norman, 2018].
    • The NICE guideline development group (GDG) for highlighted additional important limitations regarding the studies investigating silver dressings, including an unclear definition of 'infection', imprecise results with very wide confidence intervals, and both study arms had the option to use antibiotics. Silver dressings can also be expensive and could have considerable resource impact. Therefore, because of the inadequate definition of infection, the confounding issue of antibiotic use, the uncertainty of the effect estimate and the potential cost, the GDG agreed not to recommend silver dressings [NICE, 2020].

How should compression therapy be used to treat a venous leg ulcer?

Compression therapy should be applied by a healthcare professional trained in venous ulcer management (such as a district nurse or tissue viability nurse). 

  • Before starting compression therapy, the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) in both legs should be measured to exclude arterial insufficiency.
    • ABPI should be interpreted alongside clinical findings, as it may be unreliable in people with diabetes, chronic oedema, lymphoedema, or arterial calcification.
      • Toe-brachial pressure index (TBPI) or Doppler waveform analysis may be required when ABPI is unreliable.
    • Use the following thresholds to guide compression therapy:
      • ABPI <0.5  — severe arterial insufficiency is likely. Compression therapy is contraindicated. Urgent vascular assessment is required.
      • ABPI 0.5–0.79  — mixed arterial and venous disease is likely. Modified or light compression may be used with caution, supported by clinical monitoring and specialist advice where needed.
      • ABPI 0.8–1.3 — no significant arterial disease. Full compression therapy is generally considered safe.
      • ABPI >1.3–1.4 — arteries may be calcified and incompressible. ABPI is unreliable. Further vascular assessment (for example, TBPI) is required before prescribing compression.
      • Note: ABPI is not required before initiating light compression (for example, Class 1 stockings) when no red flags for arterial disease are present.
    • For people with moderate to severe cardiac failure consider seeking specialist advice as there may be a risk of fluid overload if not closely monitored.
  • Ensure that compression therapy is started immediately if appropriate. 
    • Select the degree of compression:
      • This should be guided by the person's underlying condition, but may need to be reduced to the highest level the person can tolerate safely.
      • Increase compression strength gradually if needed.
      • Reduce compression if pain, numbness, or skin damage occurs.
    • Use strong compression (Class 3; 25–35 mmHg) for:
      • Severe venous insufficiency.
      • Healing of venous leg ulcers.
      • Prevention of venous ulcer recurrence.
    • Multilayer compression bandaging systems are commercially available as kits. Compression is achieved by the combined effects of two or three extensible bandages applied over a layer of orthopaedic wadding and a wound contact dressing.
    • Different kits are available comprising slightly different components for different ankle sizes. Products currently available are outlined in the British National Formulary (BNF), and specific manufacturer's instructions should be followed for each product.
  • Encourage compliance with compression therapy by:
    • Ensuring that the person understands the reasons for, and the benefits of, compression therapy.
    • Managing associated conditions, such as oedema and venous eczema.
    • Managing complications of the ulcer, such as pain and infection.
    • Addressing the person's concerns and offering options that suit their preferences. When deciding on the type of compression to use, the following should be considered: 
      • The person's preference, lifestyle, and likely concordance — as many elderly people find graduated compression hosiery difficult to put on, this should include an assessment of the person's mobility and the availability of any help at home.
      • The required frequency of application.
      • The size and shape of leg.
  • Give general lifestyle advice to promote ulcer healing, and provide sources of further information.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are largely based on the Wounds UK Best practice statement Compression hosiery; a patient-centric approach [Wounds UK, 2021], the Wounds UK Best Practice Statement The use of compression therapy for peripheral oedema: considerations in people with heart failure [Wounds UK, 2023], and the Wounds UK guidance Compression hosiery for the prevention of recurrent leg ulceration: Evidence, efficacy and best practice [Wounds UK, 2025], the National Wound Care Strategy Programme consensus document Recommendations for lower limb ulcers [NWCSP, 2020], the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) HealthTech guidance Compression products for treating venous leg ulcers: late-stage assessment [NICE, 2025].

 

Treatment of venous leg ulcers
  • Information on the use of compression therapy for treating and preventing the recurrence of leg ulcers is based on the NICE HealthTech guidance Compression products for treating venous leg ulcers: late-stage assessment [NICE, 2025], the National Wound Care Strategy Programme consensus document Recommendations for lower limb ulcers [NWCSP, 2020] and the Wounds UK guidance Compression hosiery for the prevention of recurrent leg ulceration: Evidence, efficacy and best practice [Wounds UK, 2025].
    • NICE recommends strong compression (at least 40 mmHg of pressure at the ankle), for the treatment of venous leg ulcers [NICE, 2025]. 
    • The National Wound Care Strategy Programme advises 'strong compression' for leg wounds secondary to venous insufficiency. Two-layer compression hosiery kits are recommended as first line treatment [NWCSP, 2020].
    • Wounds UK cites good evidence that pressure of at least 40mmHg at the ankle is needed to optimise healing of leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2025].
    • There is also good evidence that higher compression levels are more effective at preventing leg ulcer recurrence.
      • A 2024 Cochrane review found that class 3 compression stockings are the most effective at reducing risk of recurrence and are more effective than class 2, but acknowledged that higher compression may lead to lower concordance with treatment [de Moraes Silva, 2024].
    • The Wounds UK guideline advises that a routine ‘step-down’ approach post-healing should be avoided. Instead clinicians should consider maintaining compression at 40 mmHg for long-term prevention, but the decision should be individualised with emphasis on shared decision making [Wounds UK, 2025].
    • CKS therefore recommends considering the use of strong compression systems as these achieve ankle pressure closest to 40 mmHg but also acknowledges that lower compression levels may aid adherence to treatment.
Mode of action of compression therapy
  • Compression therapy is the first‐line treatment for venous leg ulcers. It promotes venous leg ulcer healing by increasing venous and lymphatic return, improving microcirculation, and reducing inflammation and oedema [Alavi, 2016; Franks, 2016; Lim, 2018]. Between 30–75% of venous leg ulcers will heal after six months of compression therapy [Lim, 2018].
  • Doppler testing to confirm arterial sufficiency is required before recommending the use of compression hosiery [BNF, 2024]. The use of compression in people with severe arterial disease could lead to pressure damage, limb ischaemia, and amputation.
    • The PCDS guideline recommends repeat ankle and calf measurement a week later, as a reduction in oedema could reduce the ankle circumference and the bandage regime may need to be changed accordingly [PCDS, 2023].
  • Compression is usually graduated such that the magnitude is greatest at the ankle and gaiter area and diminishes towards the knee; this helps to control or reverse venous insufficiency. Compression therapy can be delivered through multilayer elastic or non-elastic bandaging or hosiery [SIGN, 2010].
Evidence for compression therapy
  • Evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews describes:
    • Comparing the use of compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers, there is moderate-certainty that compression therapy probably decreases healing time, and is more likely to result in complete healing within 12 months. Use of compression therapy may also be associated with decreased pain and improved quality of life. It is uncertain if there is any difference in adverse events or whether use of compression therapy is more cost effective (search date: June 2020) [Shi, 2021].
    • Comparing high-compression hosiery with no compression, there may be reduced rates of reulceration of venous ulcers, and comparing medium with high‐compression hosiery, recurrence is likely to be higher in those who use medium‐compression hosiery, despite higher compression hosiery appearing to be associated with poorer compliance. There was insufficient evidence to aid selection of different types, brands, or lengths of compression hosiery. No evidence was located regarding how long the episodes of recurrence lasted, the risk of ulcers developing in the other leg, the proportion of time during the study that participants had no ulcers, level of comfort, or unwanted effects of compression therapy (search date: August 2023) [de Moraes Silva, 2024].
  • Similar evidence has been identified in a meta-review of the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcer healing. This meta-review combined evidence from 12 systematic reviews published between 1997 and 2021. The meta-review identified moderate-certainty evidence that compression therapy improves healing when compared with no compression. There was no clear evidence of improved healing rates when comparisons were made between elastic and inelastic compression systems, four layer and less than four-layer bandage systems, between different four-layer bandage systems, or bandages compared with compression stockings [Patton, 2023].
Encouraging compliance with compression therapy
  • Compliance with compression therapy is often poor [Vivas, 2016]. Evidence identified by SIGN suggests that the main reasons for non-compliance are pain and discomfort, lack of valid lifestyle advice, and the belief that compression is unnecessary and uncomfortable [SIGN, 2010]. 
  • The recommendation on how to encourage compliance are extrapolated from expert opinion in a review article [Lim, 2018].
  • The recommendation on the points to consider when deciding on the type of compression to use is based on expert opinion in the SIGN guideline [SIGN, 2010]. 

People with cardiac failure

  • The PCDS advises that caution is needed when using compression in people with cardiac failure as there can be a risk of fluid overload if not closely monitored. Specialist advice and a multidisciplinary approach is often needed [PCDS, 2023].
  • A systematic review and international consensus statement identified adverse events reported following medical compression therapy (search date: November 2017) [Rabe, 2020]. Based on the evidence identified in the systematic review, an international expert consensus panel recommended:
    • Against applying compression in severe cases of cardiac insufficiency (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional classification level IV).
    • Against routine compression in moderate cases of cardiac insufficiency (NYHA level III).
    • In less severe cases of insufficiency, a cautious increase of compression pressure only leads to very short phases of increased cardiac load and may lead to a substantial reduction of peripheral oedema.

People with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic vasculitis

  • SIGN recommends specialist referral at an early stage of management for people with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic vasculitis [SIGN, 2010].
  • The PCDS advises that people with rheumatoid arthritis should be referred to a specialist because Dopplers may give falsely high readings, there is often additional small vessel disease, and the long-term medications used for treating rheumatoid arthritis can delay ulcer healing [PCDS, 2023].

How should I manage infection in a person with venous leg ulcer?

If there are symptoms or signs of infection, such as cellulitis (characterized by pain, warmth, swelling, and erythema of the infected area), fever, increased pain, rapid extension of the area of ulceration, malodour, and increased exudate:

  • Consider taking a swab (from deep within the ulcer after cleaning) for microbiological testing. 
  • Prescribe an oral antibiotic. 
    • For most people, prescribe flucloxacillin 500 mg four times daily for 7 days.
    • If the person is penicillin-allergic or flucloxacillin is unsuitable, consider one of the following options:
      • Clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day for 7 days. 
      • Doxycycline 200 mg on first day, then 100 mg once a day for 6 days (7-day course in total).
      • Erythromcyin 500 mg four times daily for 7 days (in pregnant women).
    • Routine long-term use of topical antiseptics and antimicrobials is not recommended.
  • Advise the person to seek medical help if symptoms of the infection worsen rapidly or significantly at any time, or do not start to improve within 2-3 days.
  • Compression therapy can be continued if tolerated. Otherwise, it can be temporarily reduced or stopped to ease pain and then returned to usual compression as soon as possible.
    • Uncontrolled exudate and oedema will prolong the cellulitis, so the aim is to return to therapeutic compression as soon as possible.
  • Reassess the person if the infection worsens rapidly or significantly at any time, does not start to improve within 2–3 days, or the person becomes systemically very unwell or has severe pain out of proportion to the infection.
    • When reassessing the person, take account of:
      • Any symptoms or signs suggesting a more serious illness or condition, such as sepsis (tachycardia, fever, and chills), necrotising fasciitis (disproportionate pain and tenderness, dusky-violaceous areas along with erythema, crepitus, blisters, and necrosis), osteomyelitis (fever, disproportionate pain, local malodour, non-healing sinus, and oedema around wound), or lymphangitis (fever, chills, swollen lymph glands, malaise, and aches).
      • Other comorbidities, such as diabetes or immunosuppression.
      • Possible complications, including allergic contact dermatitis (which may cause infection).
      • Whether uncontrolled oedema or poor compliance with compression therapy contributed to the cellulitis, and whether any changes to compression therapy are required.
      • Previous antibiotic use, which may have led to resistant bacteria.
    • If the infection is worsening or not improving, check swab results and change the antibiotic based on swab sensitivities, using a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible. Consider one of the following options (guided by microbiological results):
      • Co-amoxiclav 500/125 mg three times a day for 7 days, or 
      • Co-trimoxazole 960 mg twice a day for 7 days (in people with penicillin allergy).
    • If the infection is sensitive to the first-line antibiotic but only slowly responding, review the person after 7 days and consider continuing the antibiotic for a further 7 days. 
  • Arrange urgent hospital referral if the person has any symptoms or signs suggesting a more serious illness or condition, such as sepsis, necrotising fasciitis, or osteomyelitis.
  • Consider referring or seeking specialist advice if the person:
    • Has a high risk of complications.
    • Has lymphangitis.
    • Has spreading infection that is not responding to oral antibiotics.
    • Cannot take oral antibiotics (where appropriate, explore locally available options for giving intravenous antibiotics at home or in the community, rather than in hospital).

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline on Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], evidence from a Cochrane systematic review [O'Meara, 2014], and expert opinion in a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Grey, 2021a; Healy and Freedman, 2021].

Consider taking a swab
  • NICE recommends that clinicians do not take a sample for microbiological testing from a leg ulcer at initial presentation, even if it might be infected. This is advised as most ulcers may be colonised by bacteria but may not be clinically infected [NICE, 2020]. However, after the initial presentation or if the infection is either worsening or not improving, NICE suggest sending a swab sample at this point.
  • The NICE guidance is supported by expert opinion in a textbook on wound healing which advises that it is inappropriate to sample all wounds, and that samples for culture should be taken only from overtly infected wounds and from wounds that are deteriorating, increasing in size or failing to make satisfactory progress despite an optimal environment for wound healing [Healy and Freedman, 2021].
  • The clinical features of an infected leg ulcer are taken from the SIGN and NICE guidelines [SIGN, 2010; NICE, 2020]. 
  • The clinical features of cellulitis are taken from the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019].
When to start antibiotic treatment
  • Systemic antibiotics should only be used if there is evidence of clinical infection [SIGN, 2010; NICE, 2020]. Although most leg ulcers (80–100%) have bacteria (usually Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and β-haemolytic streptococci) present in the wound, they are usually not clinically infected [NICE, 2020; Grey, 2021a].
    • The NICE guideline development group (GDG) noted that there are some signs of infection (such as localised redness, discharge and unpleasant smell) which could be present in all leg ulcers, regardless of infection status, especially once compression is removed. The agreed symptoms or signs of infection include redness or swelling spreading beyond the ulcer, localised warmth, increased pain or fever (noting that redness may be less visible on darker skin tones) [NICE, 2020].
  • A Cochrane systematic review (search date: May 2013) found no evidence to support the routine use of systemic antibiotics in promoting healing of venous leg ulcers [O'Meara, 2014].
  • NICE advises that antibiotic treatment should be offered to all adults with a leg ulcer if there is evidence of infection because, from its experience, untreated infection causes delays in ulcer healing, affects quality of life, and results in possible hospital admission [NICE, 2020]. 
Choice of antibiotic treatment
  • In line with the NICE guidelines on Antimicrobial stewardship and Start smart – then 24 focus, the NICE GDG recommends that oral antibiotics should be given first line if the person can take them and if the severity of the infection does not require intravenous (IV) antibiotics [NICE, 2020]. 
  • The NICE GDG noted the very limited evidence on the choice of antibiotics in adults with an infected leg ulcer [NICE, 2020]. 
    • Based on its experience, current practice, and resistance data, the GDG agreed that the first-choice oral antibiotic in adults with an infected leg ulcer should be flucloxacillin. Flucloxacillin is a relatively narrow spectrum penicillin which has good penetration for skin and soft tissue infections and is effective against gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus (the most common causative organism).
    • In adults with penicillin allergy or in whom flucloxacillin is unsuitable, choices include clarithromycin, doxycycline, or erythromycin (preferred macrolide for use in pregnancy) because they all have a similar spectrum of activity to flucloxacillin.
    • In the absence of evidence for optimum course length, the GDG agreed (based on experience and extrapolation of evidence from people with cellulitis and diabetic foot infection) that a course of 7 days is appropriate for most people with an infected leg ulcer.
    • The GDG agreed that if symptoms or signs of infection were worsening after 48 hours or not improving after 7 days, this would be a reason to change the antibiotic.
    • NICE based the recommendations on antibiotic dosage, course length, and route of administration on the GDG's experience of current practice and on advice in the British National Formulary (BNF).
  • In line with the NICE guideline on Antimicrobial stewardship, the GDG agreed that adults with an infected leg ulcer should be advised on the possible adverse effects of the antibiotic and when to seek medical help. In its experience, some improvement in infection symptoms or signs would be expected within 2–3 days. If symptoms of the infection worsen rapidly or significantly, or do not start to improve within 2-3 days, this may indicate that the person has a more serious illness or condition.
  • There is no evidence to support regular application of topical antimicrobials or antiseptics for the eradication of bacterial colonization [Lim, 2018]. SIGN advises that topical antibiotics should be avoided as they are frequent sensitizers [SIGN, 2010].
Managing compression therapy
  • This recommendation is extrapolated from the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], which states that if cellulitis is identified in a person with a venous leg ulcer, compression can be temporarily reduced to the person's tolerance to ease pain and then returned to high compression as soon as possible.
Reassessment
  • The recommendation on when to reassess the person is based on the experience of the NICE GDG [NICE, 2020]. 
  • Where the infection is worsening or not improving, the GDG agreed that the second-line treatment (guided by microbiological results if an appropriate sample has been taken) would be the broader spectrum antibiotics co-amoxiclav (a penicillin with a beta-lactamase inhibitor) or co-trimoxazole (in penicillin allergy), which are more active against gram-negative organisms. The GDG discussed that the presence of gram-negative organisms may be a reason why an infected leg ulcer is not healing [NICE, 2020]. 
Referral or seeking specialist advice
  • The recommendation on when to refer or seek specialist advice is based on the experience of the NICE GDG [NICE, 2020]. 

How should I manage pain in a person with a venous leg ulcer?

  • Determine the nature of the pain to help exclude an underlying cause.
    • Ask about the location, severity, duration, frequency (and when it occurs), triggers and relievers, and the impact of the pain on the person’s quality of life and functional ability. 
      • Venous leg ulcers can sometimes cause constant or intermittent pain.
      • Severe or worsening pain may indicate a complication, such as an infection. 
      • Pain can also be caused by arterial disease, diabetic neuropathy, vascular structures (superficial, deep phlebitis), pitting oedema, lipodermatosclerosis, and contact dermatitis. 
      • Changing dressings, debridement, and firm bandages can also cause pain.
    • Consider using a validated pain tool, such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), to assess pain.
  • Advise the person:
    • To take a simple analgesic, such as paracetamol with or without codeine, as needed. See the CKS topic on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain for more information.
      • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not recommended for pain control because they impair wound healing and may worsen leg oedema.
    • That leg elevation may help with the pain associated with oedema. 
  • If there is pain at dressing changes:
    • Ensure an appropriate dressing is used and the frequency of dressing changes is minimized.
    • Advise the person to take a simple analgesia (such as paracetamol with or without codeine) at least 30 minutes before a dressing change, where possible. 
  • If neuropathic pain is present, see the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment for management information.
  • If the pain is uncontrolled or chronic, refer the person to the pain team.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Health Service Executive (HSE) guideline HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], a Cochrane systematic review on topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers [Briggs, 2012], and expert opinion in review articles [Alavi, 2016; Tate, 2018] and a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Schultz, 2021]. 

Determining the nature of the pain
  • The recommendation on the questions to ask are based on expert opinion in the joint EWMA and Wounds Australia document [Franks, 2016] and the HSE guideline [HSE, 2018]. These guidelines also recommend the use of a reliable and valid pain tool for pain assessment.
Offering pain relief
  • Venus leg ulcers greatly affect quality of life, mostly because of pain [Franks, 2016]; between 17–65% of people with a leg ulcer experience severe or continuous pain [Briggs, 2012].
  • Pain relief is important to maximize quality of life and enable mobilization [Briggs, 2012].
Simple analgesia before dressing change
  • Expert opinion in review articles is that oral analgesia should be offered as required for dressing changes [Alavi, 2016; Tate, 2018]. 
  • CKS recommends simple analgesics, such as paracetamol with or without codeine, as they are safe and effective. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not recommended because they impair wound healing and may worsen leg oedema [Wounds UK, 2019; Schultz, 2021]..

How should I manage oedema in a person with venous leg ulcer?

  • Check compliance with compression therapy.
    • Common reasons for non-compliance include pain, discomfort, a lack of valid lifestyle advice, and the belief that compression was unnecessary and uncomfortable.
  • Advise the person to:
    • Elevate their legs (above hip level) for 30 minutes three to four times a day.
    • Consider placing pillows under their feet and legs while sleeping. 
  • Exclude other causes of oedema, such as:
  • If oedema is persistent or worsening, refer for specialist assessment.
    • Do not prescribe a diuretic for persistent or worsening oedema.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are extrapolated from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], and expert opinion in review articles [Alavi, 2016; Vivas, 2016; Lim, 2018].

Checking compliance with compression therapy
  • Compression therapy is the most important step in the management of venous leg ulcers [PCDS, 2023].
  • Compression therapy promotes venous leg ulcer healing by increasing venous and lymphatic return, improving microcirculation, and reducing inflammation and oedema [SIGN, 2010; Alavi, 2016; Franks, 2016; Lim, 2018]. 
  • A review described in the SIGN guideline described pain, discomfort and lack of valid lifestyle advice have been cited as the main reasons for non-compliance, and the belief that compression was unnecessary and uncomfortable also had a significant detrimental effect, whereas the belief that compression was worthwhile and prevented recurrence improved compliance [SIGN, 2010].
  • CKS recommends checking compliance with compression therapy in people with oedema.
Leg elevation
  • Leg elevation encourages venous return and may reduce pain, swelling, and oedema [SIGN, 2010; Franks, 2016; Vivas, 2016; Lim, 2018; PCDS, 2023].
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that elevation of the legs above the heart level for 30 minutes three to four times daily, as well as leg elevation at night, allows swelling to subside and improves venous microcirculation [Vivas, 2016].
Excluding other causes of oedema
  • This recommendation is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Managing persistent of worsening oedema
  • This recommendation is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

How should I manage eczema in a person with venous leg ulcer?

  • If there is worsening venous eczema, assess for signs of infection, such as cellulitis (characterized by pain, warmth, swelling, and erythema of the infected area), fever, increased pain, rapid extension of the area of ulceration, malodour, and increased exudate.
    • If there are signs of infection, see the section on Managing infection for more information.
    • If there are no signs of an infection:
      • Advise regular application of an emollient, and treat flares with a topical corticosteroid. See the CKS topic on Eczema - atopic for detailed information on the use of emollients and topical steroids, and skin care advice.
      • If compression bandaging is being used, consider replacing bandages more frequently than once weekly to allow application of topical treatment.
  • If there is no clinical improvement or allergic contact dermatitis is suspected, refer the person to dermatology for consideration of patch testing.
    • Advise the person to avoid any allergens subsequently identified.
    • Common allergens that may be present in creams and dressings used for venous leg ulcer management include preservatives, emulsifiers, latex, resins, lanolin, and topical steroids, antibiotics, and antiseptics.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in a review article [Tate, 2018] and on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

How should I follow up a person with venous leg ulcer?

Ideally, people with uncomplicated ulcers should be reviewed at least weekly for the first 2 weeks after initiation of primary care treatment. If the ulcer is healing, this period can be extended depending on clinical judgement.

  • During the review:
    • Inspect and compare the ulcer with the initial assessment to see if there is evidence of healing, suggested by reduced ulcer size, development of healthy pink granulation tissue, reduced amounts of exudate, and improved symptoms of pain and oedema. 
    • Check compliance with compression therapy — poor compliance may be due to heat, discomfort, and the impractical nature of the bandaging. 
    • Check compliance with lifestyle advice.
    • Assess for (and manage):
      • Associated conditions, such as oedema and venous eczema.
      • Complications related to the ulcer, including pain and infection.
      • Complications related to the dressings applied, including skin maceration (indicated by a marked cut-off appearance) and allergic contact dermatitis. Maceration is usually caused by the inability of the dressing to manage exudate. More frequent dressing changes, or a change in dressing type, should be considered. The surrounding skin should also be protected with an emollient. 
      • Complications related to compression bandaging, including pressure damage and arterial insufficiency. Compression bandages should be removed immediately if the person experiences a change in foot colour or temperature, or increased pain. Seek further medical advice if there is no improvement after removing the bandages. 
  • Refer to a vascular specialist or dermatologist (depending on clinical judgement) if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy.
  • There is no consensus among guidelines on the frequency of repeat ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) measurements.
    • Repeat ABPI measurements should ideally be done at the first signs of ulcer deterioration, ulcer recurrence, sudden increase in ulcer size or pain, or change in foot colour or temperature.
    • Follow local policies if available. 

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are largely based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Health Service Executive (HSE) guideline HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], and expert opinion in review articles [Alavi, 2016; Vivas, 2016; Singer, 2017; Lim, 2018].

Frequency of review
  • Expert opinion in the HSE guideline is that once adequate treatment has been initiated, venous leg ulcer should show some signs of progression within 2–4 weeks [HSE, 2018]. 
  • CKS recommends reviewing the person at least weekly for the first 2 weeks to assess the ulcer and compliance with treatment. If the ulcer is healing and compliance is good, this period can be extended depending on clinical judgement.
  • Some experts recommend that reviews should be done at a minimum of 4 weekly intervals [Franks, 2016; HSE, 2018; Wounds UK, 2019].
Referral if there is delayed or no healing
  • The active management of leg ulcers may be required over many months or years [SIGN, 2010; Wounds UK, 2019]. However, once adequate treatment has been initiated, a venous leg ulcer should show some signs of progression within 2–4 weeks [HSE, 2018].
  • The recommendation to refer if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy is extrapolated from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Varicose veins: Diagnosis and management [NICE, 2013]. 
    • NICE recommends early referral to a vascular service, where a venous leg ulcer has not healed within 2 weeks, where a full clinical and duplex Doppler ultrasound assessment as well as a full range of treatments can be provided.
    • The NICE guideline development group highlighted that the location of this service can be decided locally, with some of the service being delivered in primary care where skills and equipment are available.
    • Based on this, CKS recommends referring to a vascular specialist or dermatologist (depending on clinical judgement) if there is delayed or no healing after 2 weeks of compression therapy, which should be applied by a healthcare professional trained in venous ulcer management (such as a district nurse or tissue viability nurse).
  • SIGN recommends specialist referral at an early stage of management for people with a non-healing ulcer [SIGN, 2010].
Frequency of repeat ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) measurements
  • There is no consensus among guidelines on the frequency of repeat ABPI measurements [Franks, 2016]. In practice, the frequency will be guided by local availability and resources. 
  • The recommendation on when repeat ABPI measurements should ideally be done is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

How should I prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcer?

  • After a venous leg ulcer has healed, offer below-knee graduated compression stockings to prevent recurrence. 
    • Advise the person that compression hosiery has been proven to reduce the rate of ulcer recurrence and that it is likely that compression will be required indefinitely.
    • See the CKS topic on Compression stockings for detailed information on the use of compression stockings, including information on:
      • The recommended strength of compression — the person should be offered the strongest compression that they can tolerate. Stockings prescribed in primary care follow the British standard for class of compression: class 3 (25–35 mmHg), class 2 (18–24 mmHg), and class 1 (14–17 mmHg). Hospital departments may provide European standard stockings, which provide a stronger degree of compression for each class. 
      • Available products — compression stockings are available in two lengths (below the knee and thigh length), with either closed toe or open toe (with or without a heel), and in a range of styles and colours. 
      • How often the stocking should be changed — compression stockings should be replaced every 3–6 months. Ideally, the leg should be re-measured each time a stocking is replaced.
      • Frequency of review — ideally, Doppler studies should be repeated every 6–12 months (or earlier if clinically indicated). Follow local policies if available. 
      • How to encourage compliance with wearing stockings — compliance should be encouraged by keeping the person well informed, addressing their concerns, and offering options that suit their preferences. 
  • Give general lifestyle advice to reduce the risk of ulcer recurrence, and provide sources of further information.
  • For people with chronic venous leg ulcer and superficial venous reflux, consider referring for superficial venous surgery to prevent recurrence. 

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement Compression hosiery: A patient centric approach [Wounds UK, 2021], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2024], evidence from a Cochrane systematic review [de Moraes Silva, 2024], and expert opinion in review articles [Alavi, 2016; Vivas, 2016; Lim, 2018].

Strategies for preventing leg ulcer recurrence
  • Chronic leg ulcers almost always recur unless secondary prevention is maintained [SIGN, 2010]. 
  • Where leg ulcer healing has been achieved, SIGN advises the use of below-knee graduated compression hosiery to prevent recurrence [SIGN, 2010]. 
    • SIGN based this recommendation on evidence from a Cochrane systematic review which found that in people with chronic venous insufficiency and a history of leg ulcer, well-fitted graduated compression hosiery (below knee) restored venous function and reduced recurrence rate. The review concluded that people should be offered the strongest compression with which they can comply.
    • An updated version of the Cochrane systematic review in August 2023 located evidence from one small trial which showed that high-compression hosiery reduces rates of reulceration of venous ulcers compared with no compression. Evidence from five trials showed that recurrence was higher in medium‐compression hosiery than in high‐compression hosiery, despite higher compression hosiery appearing to be associated with poorer compliance. There was insufficient evidence to aid selection of different types, brands, or lengths of compression hosiery. No evidence was located regarding how long the episodes of recurrence lasted, the risk of ulcers developing in the other leg, the proportion of time during the study that participants had no ulcers, level of comfort, or unwanted effects of compression therapy [de Moraes Silva, 2024].
  • The Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement Compression hosiery: A patient centric approach [Wounds UK, 2021] and the joint EWMA and Wounds Australia document [Franks, 2016] also recommend the continued use of compression therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence of venous leg ulcers.

What information and advice should I give a person with a venous leg ulcer?

  • To promote healing of the ulcer and reduce the risk of recurrence:
    • Encourage the person to be compliant with compression therapy. Advise that:
      • Compression therapy has been proven to promotes venous leg ulcer healing and reduce the risk of recurrence.
      • If there are any difficulties, they should contact the district/tissue viability nurse before deciding to stop using them. 
      • They should remove the compression immediately and seek urgent medical advice if they experience features of arterial disease, such as numbness, tingling, pain, or dusky toes.
    • Advise the person to:
      • Keep mobile with regular walking (to exercise calf muscle pump function). 
      • Elevate the legs when immobile. 
      • Avoid trauma and wear appropriate (well-fitting) footwear. 
      • Use an emollient frequently, and avoid products that may contain any identified sensitizing agents (such as lanolin and preservatives).
      • Examine their legs regularly for broken skin, blisters, swelling, or redness. 
      • Adopt a healthy lifestyle. They should: 
        • Lose weight (if overweight or obese). See the CKS topic on Obesity for more information. 
        • Eat a balanced diet (malnutrition impairs ulcer healing).
        • Drink alcohol within recommended levels. See the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking for more information. 
        • Stop smoking (if applicable). See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for more information.
  • Provide sources of further information.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a joint document by the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) and Wounds Australia Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice [Franks, 2016], the Health Service Executive (HSE) guideline HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], the Wounds UK document Best Practice Statement: Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers [Wounds UK, 2019], evidence from a Cochrane systematic review [de Moraes Silva, 2024], and expert opinion in review articles [Vivas, 2016; Lim, 2018; Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019; Barnes, 2023] and a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Grey, 2021a].

Encouraging compliance with compression therapy
  • Compression therapy has been proven to promote venous leg ulcer healing and reduce the risk of recurrence [SIGN, 2010]  [Franks, 2016; Wounds UK, 2019; de Moraes Silva, 2024]. However, adherence is often poor [Vivas, 2016; Barnes, 2023].
  • Expert opinion published in a review article highlights that there are multiple factors which influence adherence with compression therapy, broadly fitting with 4 themes for non-compliance (lack of education about the treatment, pain/discomfort, physical limitations and psychosocial reasons). The review authors recommend a personalised approach to addressing any concerns a person may have [Barnes, 2023].
    • Specific barriers to the use of compression therapy include wound drainage, pain, application difficulties, physical impairment (weakness, obesity, decreased range of motion), and leg shape deformity (leading to compression material rolling down the leg or wrinkling) [Bonkemeyer Millan, 2019].
  • Evidence identified by SIGN suggests that the main reasons for non-compliance with compression therapy are pain and discomfort, lack of valid lifestyle advice, and the belief that compression is unnecessary and uncomfortable [SIGN, 2010]. 
Unwanted effects of compression therapy
  • Guidance from the PCDS guideline and expert opinion in a textbook on wound healing advise:
    • Over-compression can cause pressure trauma. Following application, if a person shows signs of pain, reduced colour or numbness on their extremities, the bandage must be removed immediately [PCDS, 2023].
    • People using compression therapy should be warned to look out for any side‐effects of compression (such as numbness, tingling, pain, dusky toes). Where unwanted effects arise, the compression should be removed and medical advice should be sought [Grey, 2021a].
Other lifestyle advice
  • There are few intervention studies which address the effects of lifestyle modification on rates of healing of venous leg ulcers or the prevention of recurrence [SIGN, 2010]. 
    • There is some evidence that supervised calf muscle exercise increases calf muscle pump function and improves haemodynamics [SIGN, 2010; Franks, 2016; Lim, 2018]. More studies are needed to determine whether this may have a beneficial effect on ulcer healing [SIGN, 2010]. 
    • No good-quality evidence was identified on the effectiveness of nutrition interventions or nutritional supplementation in the treatment of people with venous leg ulcer [SIGN, 2010]. The recommendation to adopt a healthy lifestyle is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice. 
  • SIGN advises that general care of the skin surrounding an ulcer is essential to maintain skin integrity and minimize the risk of further ulceration. The skin around the ulcer should be treated routinely with a bland emollient, and ulcer margins should be coated with a barrier preparation to prevent maceration of surrounding skin [SIGN, 2010].
  • Expert opinion in a textbook on wound healing recommends cleaning the wound at every dressing change with potable water (to remove debris, dry skin and dressing material), and that emollients should be used on surrounding skin to prevent drying. It also recommends that the leg should always be elevated when seated (but an active lifestyle should be encouraged), and advice to improve general health and well‐being, such as weight management, adequate nutrition and smoking cessation [Grey, 2021a]. CKS also recommends smoking cessation because nicotine is a vasoconstrictor and adversely affects the microcirculation, leading to impaired wound healing.
  • Expert opinion in the HSE guideline is that adherence with lifestyle advice is likely improved using a shared-decision-making approach to increase understanding about how the advised changes an aid both healing of the ulcer and prevention of recurrence. It is therefore vital that the person understands the importance of any advice given and the proper implementation [HSE, 2018].
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that activities that promote good skin care and hygiene, reduction of leg oedema, good nutrition, obesity reduction, and improvement in general health and wellbeing should be encouraged in a person with a venous leg ulcer [Lim, 2018].
Providing sources of further information
  • The HSE recommends that people with venous leg ulcers should be given verbal and/or written education to improve their knowledge of managing the condition (specifically regarding compression hosiery) [HSE, 2018]. 
  • Expert opinion published in a review article highlights that the combination of promoting self-care and providing educational materials likely encourages treatment concordance, may help improve ulcer healing and prevent recurrence [Barnes, 2023].

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on dosages, contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Clarithromycin

What are the contraindications and cautions for clarithromycin?

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
    • A history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including Torsades de pointes arrhythmias.
    • Hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia.
    • Severe hepatic impairment in combination with renal impairment.
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution to:
    • People with:
      • Impaired hepatic function and those taking potentially hepatotoxic drugs — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver. Hepatic dysfunction, including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice), has been rarely reported with its use.
      • Conditions which predispose to QT interval prolongation (such as electrolyte disturbances) and those taking drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as amiodarone, sotalol, and amisulpride) — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of Torsades de pointes arrhythmias.
      • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 — if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe half the normal dose of clarithromycin.  Avoid clarithromycin modified-release (M/R) preparations in this patient populations. If creatinine clearance is 30–60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 half the normal dose should be used for M/R preparations.
      • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, or bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats per minute) — increased risk of QT prolongation.
      • Myasthenia gravis — clarithromycin may aggravate symptoms.
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. See the section on Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding for more information.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024a]

What are the possible adverse effects of clarithromycin?

  • The most common adverse effects of clarithromycin are abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, taste perversion, and diarrhoea.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis (an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridium difficile) if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with clarithromycin. See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
  • Reversible hearing loss (sometimes with tinnitus) can occur after large doses of clarithromycin.
  • Other adverse effects of clarithromycin include:
    • Uncommon — burping, dry mouth, epistaxis, muscle complaints, oral disorders, thrombocytosis, and tremor.
    • Rare or very rare — Myasthenia gravis, and tubulointerstitial nephritis.
    • Frequency not known — abnormal dreams, agranulocytosis, depersonalization, depression, mania, myopathy, psychotic disorder, renal failure, tooth discolouration, and urine discolouration.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024a]

What are some possible drug interactions with clarithromycin?

  • Drug interactions with clarithromycin include:
    • Aminophylline — aminophylline is predicted to cause hypokalaemia (potentially increasing the risk of Torsade de pointes) when given with clarithromycin.
      • Manufacturer makes no recommendation.
    • Calcium channel blockers — clarithromycin may increase serum levels of calcium channel blockers metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem).
      • Due to an increased risk of adverse effects, particularly hypotension, caution is advised with concurrent use.
    • Carbamazepine — clarithromycin slightly increases the concentration of carbamazepine. 
      • Monitor carbamazepine levels. 
      • Advise the person to report symptoms of carbamazepine toxicity (such as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Colchicine — clarithromycin possibly increases the risk of colchicine toxicity.
      • Stop or reduce the dose of colchicine.
      • Avoid concurrent use in people with renal or hepatic impairment.
    • CYP450 inducing medicines — Strong inducers of the cytochrome P450 metabolism system such as efavirenz, nevirapine, rifampicin, rifabutin, and rifapentine may accelerate clarithromycin metabolism and alter the plasma concentration ratios of parent drug to active metabolite (which have different microbiological activity), thereby altering the therapeutic effect.
    • Digoxin — clarithromycin increases the concentration of digoxin.
      • Monitor digoxin concentration.
    • Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as amiodarone, amisulpride, astemizole, cisapride, domperidone, fluconazole, pimozide, sildenafil, terfenadine, and tricyclic antidepressants) — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of Torsades de pointes.
      • Most manufacturers advise avoiding the use of two or more drugs that are associated with QT prolongation. Increasing age, female sex, cardiac disease, and some metabolic disturbances (notably hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia) predispose to QT prolongation.
    • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, and short-acting beta-2 agonists) — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
    • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
    • Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine — clarithromycin is predicted to increase the risk of ergotism when given with ergotamine or dihydroergotamine and is contraindicated.
    • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
    • Midazolam — manufacturer advises avoid. Concomitant use with oral midazolam has been observed to substantially increase the systemic concentration.
    • Oral hypoglycaemic drugs — clarithromycin is predicted to slightly increase the exposure to oral hypoglycaemic drugs (such as gliclazide, glibenclamide, glimepiride, and glipizide), increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.
      • Monitor blood glucose levels more regularly, and adjust the dose of the oral hypoglycaemic drug accordingly. 
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy due to cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 inhibition [MHRA, 2014].  
      • For simvastatin (potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) — concurrent use is contraindicated. If clarithromycin treatment cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin during the course of antibiotic treatment.
      • For atorvastatin (moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor) — avoid concurrent use if possible. If clarithromycin treatment cannot be avoided, stop treatment with atorvastatin during the course of antibiotic treatment or prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (that is 10 mg) and do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily. Advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • For pravastatin — prescribe clarithromycin with caution, and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • Other statins — rosuvastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions, and clinically significant interaction with clarithromycin is not expected for fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Theophylline — theophylline is predicted to cause hypokalaemia (potentially increasing the risk of Torsade de pointes) when given with clarithromycin.
      • Monitor theophylline levels. Consider a dose reduction of theophylline if toxicity is suspected (for example if headache, nausea, or palpitations occur).
    • Ticagrelor — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ticagrelor.
    • Quetiapine — clarithromycin may increase the plasma concentration of quetiapine.
      • Avoid concurrent use.
    • Ranolazine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ranolazine.
    • Ritonavir — concomitant use may inhibit clarthromycin metabolism resulting in a marked increase in the systemic concentration. Because of the large therapeutic window for clarithromycin, no dosage reduction should be necessary in people with normal renal function, but dosage adjustments should be considered for people with renal impairment. 
      • The manufacturer recommends that the dose should be reduced by 75% for people with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, and by 50% for people with an eGFR of 30-60 mL/minute/1.73 m2.
      • A maximum dose of 1 g/day is recommended in people also using ritonavir.
    • Warfarin — clarithromycin may enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. 
      • Increase monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. 
  • Oral hormonal contraception — there is no established drug interaction between clarithromycin and oral hormonal contraception.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024a]

Can clarithromycin be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • The manufacturer states that the use of clarithromycin is not advised in pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester, unless the potential benefit outweighs the risk [EMC, 2024a].
    • Available data for clarithromycin does not suggest an increased risk of congenital malformation, and although studies have described associations between clarithromycin use in pregnancy and miscarriage, these findings are considered inconclusive [UKTIS, 2020].
    • Certain infections arising during pregnancy can cause serious harm to both to the mother and baby if not treated appropriately. Where the benefits of treatment are expected to outweigh the risks, and where no suitable safe alternative is available, a macrolide can be used during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020; MHRA, 2021].
  • Breastfeeding
    • Clarithromycin passes into breast milk in small amounts. With maternal use of 500 mg/day, it is estimated that a breastfed infant would receive approximately 1% of the recommended paediatric (<6 months) dosage [LactMed, 2022; SPS, 2024a].
    • The manufacturer states that the use of clarithromycin during breastfeeding is not advised unless the potential benefit outweighs the risk [EMC, 2024a].
    • Inconclusive epidemiological evidence has suggested that there may be an increased risk of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants following maternal macrolide use whilst breastfeeding, especially in infants exposed in the first 2 weeks after birth [SPS, 2024a].
    • Clarithromycin can be used during breastfeeding with precautionary infant monitoring for gastro-intestinal disturbances such as diarrhoea and vomiting, oral candida infection, rashes, sleep disturbances, irritability, sweating, and loss of appetite [SPS, 2024a].
  • Although clarithromycin use may be justifiable following a careful evaluation of the risks and benefits, erythromycin is the macrolide of choice in pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Co-amoxiclav

What are the contraindications and cautions for co-amoxiclav?

  • Do not prescribe co-amoxiclav to people with:
    • A true penicillin hypersensitivity.
      • Note that gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin. See the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for more information.
    • A history of severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction to cephalosporins — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity. 
    • A history of co-amoxiclav- or penicillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe co-amoxiclav with caution to people with:
    • Hepatic impairment — monitor closely.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) — reduce the dose of co-amoxiclav based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR):
      • If the eGFR is 10–30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one 500/125 strength tablet every 12 hours.
      • If the eGFR is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one 500/125 strength tablet every 24 hours.
    • Acute lymphocytic leukaemia, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, cytomegalovirus infection, or glandular fever — increased risk of erythematous rashes.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024b]

What are the possible adverse effects of co-amoxiclav?

  • Gastrointestinal — diarrhoea (very common), nausea and vomiting (common), antibiotic-associated colitis, drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome, acute pancreatitis, black hairy tongue (unknown frequency). 
  • Hepatobiliary disorders — Rises in aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT; uncommon).
  • Nervous system — headache, dizziness (uncommon), reversible hyperactivity, convulsions, aseptic meningitis (unknown frequency).
  • Skin — skin rash, urticaria, pruritus (uncommon), erythema multiforme (rare).
    • Unknown frequency: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP).
  • Other rare adverse effects, or adverse effects of unknown frequency include:
    • Crystalluria (including acute renal injury).
    • Hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice.
    • Hyperactivity, convulsions.
    • Hypersensitivity reactions (serious and occasionally fatal).  
    • Interstitial nephritis.
    • Linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA).  
    • Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia.
    • Prolonged prothrombin time.
    • Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can cause myocardial infarction). 
  • Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) are adverse effects of unknown frequency.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024b]

What are the possible drug interactions with co-amoxiclav?

  • Possible drug interactions with co-amoxiclav include:
    • Allopurinol — concurrent use of allopurinol and co-amoxiclav may increase the incidence of skin rashes.
      • Manufacturer advises to consider alternatives.
    • Methotrexate — amoxicillin is predicted to increase the risk of toxicity when given with methotrexate.
      • If concurrent treatment is indicated, monitor methotrexate levels more closely. One recommendation is to carry out twice weekly platelet and white cell counts for 2 weeks initially, with the measurement of methotrexate levels if toxicity is suspected.
    • Probenecid — the renal tubular secretion of amoxicillin is decreased by probenecid. Concurrent use may result in increased and prolonged blood levels of amoxicillin, but not of clavulanic acid.
      • Manufacturer recommends avoiding concurrent use.
    • Oral anticoagulants — penicillins may alter the effect of oral anticoagulants (including, acenocoumarol, phenindione and warfarin).
      • Monitor the prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) more closely with the addition or withdrawal of a penicillin. Adjustment of the oral anticoagulant dose may be necessary.
    • Mycophenolate mofetil — concurrent use with o-amoxiclav may reduce the concentration of the active metabolite of mycophenolate.
      • Manufacturer advises close clinical monitoring when used in combination.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of penicillins.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024b]

Can co-amoxiclav be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • Co-amoxiclav is not known to be harmful in pregnancy [BNF, 2024].
    • Although evidence is limited for co-amoxiclav specifically, the vast majority of a large amount of safety data for penicillins as a class do not indicate increased risks of congenital malformation, miscarriage, intrauterine death, low birth weight, preterm delivery, or neonatal complications [UKTIS, 2019].
  • Breastfeeding
    • Trace amounts of co-amoxiclav are found in breastmilk, but it is appropriate to use in women who are breastfeeding [BNF, 2024].
    • Broad-spectrum penicillins, such as amoxicillin, are one of the preferred choices of antibiotic for breastfeeding women as there is more evidence and experience to support its use [SPS, 2024b].

Co-trimoxazole

What are the contraindications and cautions for co-trimoxazole?

  • Do not prescribe co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) to people with:
    • Severe hepatic impairment.
    • Severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 15 mL/minute/1.73 m2 ), unless plasma levels of co-trimoxazole can be monitored regularly.
      • If plasma levels of co-trimoxazole can be monitored regularly, prescribe half the recommended dose.
      • The manufacturer recommends that the plasma concentration of sulfamethoxazole is checked at 2 to 3 days using samples obtained 12 hours after administration of co-trimoxazole, with treatment interrupted if the concentration exceeds 150 microgram/ml. Treatment should only be restarted when the concentration falls below 120 microgram/ml. This is only likely to be available in secondary care settings. 
    • Severe haematological disorders, such as blood dyscrasias (unless under specialist supervision).
    • Acute porphyria — both trimethoprim and sulfonamides (although not specifically sulfamethoxazole) have been associated with clinical exacerbation of porphyria.
  • Prescribe co-trimoxazole with caution to:
    • Elderly people — increased risk of serious adverse effects, particularly when complicating conditions exist, for example renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and/or concurrent use of other drugs.
      • Use half the normal dose if creatinine clearance is between 15 and 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2.
    • People with:
      • Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency — risk of haemolytic anaemia.
      • Severe allergy and asthma.
      • A predisposition to folate deficiency (for example elderly people).
      • Predisposition to hyperkalaemia — close monitoring of serum potassium is warranted.
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. See the section on Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding for more information.
  • During treatment with co-trimoxazole, an adequate urinary output should be maintained. 
    • Evidence of crystalluria in vivo is rare, although sulfonamide crystals have been noted in cooled urine from people treated with co-trimoxazole. The risk may be increased in people who are malnourished.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

What are the possible adverse effects of co-trimoxazole?

  • Headache, nausea, skin rashes, hyperkalaemia, fungal overgrowth, and diarrhoea are common or very common adverse effects of co-trimoxazole.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis (an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridiodes difficile) if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with co-trimoxazole. See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
  • Blood disorders (including leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, and eosinophilia) are rare but serious adverse effects of co-trimoxazole.
    • Discontinue treatment with co-trimoxazole immediately if blood disorders develop.
  • Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), have been rarely reported with co-trimoxazole.
    • Advise people taking co-trimoxazole to monitor closely for skin reactions. The highest risk for occurrence of SJS, TEN, or DRESS is within the first weeks of treatment.
    • If symptoms or signs of SJS, TEN, or DRESS (for example progressive skin rash often with blisters or mucosal lesions) occur, discontinue treatment with co-trimoxazole.
    • If a person develops SJS or TEN with the use of co-trimoxazole, co-trimoxazole must not be re-started at any time.
  • Other adverse effects of co-trimoxazole include:
    • Uncommon — vomiting.
    • Rare or very rare — angioedema, arthralgia, ataxia, cough, decreased appetite, depression, dizziness, dyspnoea, fever, haemolysis, hallucination, hepatic disorders, hypoglycaemia, aseptic meningitis, metabolic acidosis, myalgia, myocarditis allergic, nephritis tubulointerstitial, pancreatitis, peripheral neuritis, photosensitivity reaction, renal impairment, renal tubular acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, seizure, serum sickness, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), tinnitus, uveitis, vasculitis, and vertigo.
    • Severe respiratory toxicity including potential progression to Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

What are the possible drug interactions with co-trimoxazole?

  • Interactions with co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) include:
    • Azathioprine — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the risk of haematological abnormalities.
    • Cyclosporine — reversible deterioration in renal function has been observed in concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole.
    • Digoxin — concurrent use of trimethoprim with digoxin has been shown to increase plasma digoxin levels in some elderly people.
      • If there are symptoms of digoxin toxicity (for example, nausea, anorexia, or disturbance of colour vision), check serum digoxin levels.
    • Diuretics — in elderly people concurrently receiving diuretics, mainly thiazides, there appears to be an increased risk of thrombocytopenia with or without purpura.
      • Manufacturer makes no recommendation.
    • Drugs that can cause hyperkalaemia (for example angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics) — concurrent use with co-trimoxazole may result in clinically significant hyperkalaemia. 
      • Concurrent use should be done cautiously. 
    • Lamivudine — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the bioavailability of lamivudine.
    • Methotrexate — co-trimoxazole may increase free plasma levels of methotrexate. In addition, methotrexate and trimethoprim are both anti-folate drugs.
      • Avoid concurrent use with co-trimoxazole.  
      • If co-trimoxazole treatment is necessary, a folate supplement should be considered.
    • Phenytoin — co-trimoxazole may prolong the half-life of phenytoin, resulting in increased serum phenytoin levels.
      • If symptoms of phenytoin toxicity (confusion, blurred vision, nystagmus, ataxia, or drowsiness) are present, monitor serum phenytoin levels and reduce the dose if necessary.
    • Pyrimethamine — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole and pyrimethamine at doses in excess of 25 mg-/week may increase the risk of megaloblastic anaemia.
    • Repaglinide — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the exposure of repaglinide resulting in hypoglycaemia.
    • Warfarin — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. 
      • Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
    • Zidovudine — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the risk of haematological adverse reactions.
      • Monitor haematological parameters.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after a course of co-trimoxazole.
    • Although the manufacturer recommends the use of alternative methods of contraception whilst using co-trimoxazole, there is no established drug interaction between co-trimoxazole (nor clavulanic acid or trimethoprim individually) and oral hormonal contraception.
    • However, advise women on the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the section on vomiting or diarrhoea in the CKS topics on Contraception - combined hormonal methods and Contraception - progestogen-only methods. 

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

Can co-trimoxazole be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • The manufacturer advises that co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) should not be used in pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester, unless clearly necessary. 
    • Studies investigating the safety of co-trimoxazole in pregnancy are limited by small study sample sizes and study design methodologies which may have introduced bias. The findings of these studies are therefore inconclusive.
      • Case-control studies have shown that there may be an association between exposure to folate antagonists (such as trimethoprim) and birth defects in humans. In animal studies, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole have been shown to cause foetal abnormalities.
      • Studies have also described associations with other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage, low birth weight and preterm delivery.
      • Also, sulfamethoxazole competes with bilirubin for binding to plasma albumin. As significantly maternally derived drug levels persist for several days in the newborn, there may be a risk of precipitating or exacerbating neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia, with an associated theoretical risk of kernicterus, when co-trimoxazole is used in the third trimester. This theoretical risk is particularly relevant in infants at increased risk of hyperbilirubinaemia, such as those who are preterm and those with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
    • Where there are no suitable alternatives to co-trimoxazole, the benefits of treatment may outweigh the risks. Discussion with a specialist or advisory service is recommended.
      • The UK Teratology Information Service provide evidence-based advice to NHS healthcare professional about medication safety in pregnancy (0344 892 0909; available 9 am to 5 pm, Monday to Friday [excluding bank holidays]).
  • Breastfeeding
    • Co-trimoxazole passes into breast milk in small amounts.
    • The manufacturer advises that co-trimoxazole should be avoided during breastfeeding if the mother or infant has, or is at particular risk of developing, hyperbilirubinaemia. 
    • There is a small risk of kernicterus in jaundiced infants, and of haemolysis in G6PD-deficient infants (due to sulfamethoxazole).

[Lactmed, 2021; UKTIS, 2023; BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

Doxycycline

What are the contraindications and cautions for doxycycline?

  • Do not prescribe doxycycline to pregnant or breastfeeding women. See the section on Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding for more information.
  • Prescribe doxycycline with caution to people with:
    • Hepatic impairment and those taking potentially hepatotoxic drugs.
    • Myasthenia gravis — tetracyclines may increase muscle weakness in people with myasthenia gravis.
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) — tetracyclines may exacerbate SLE symptoms.
    • Renal impairment — studies have shown no significant difference in the serum half-life of doxycycline between individuals with normal and severely impaired renal function; avoid excessive doses.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

What are the possible adverse effects of doxycycline?

  • Blood disorders — haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, eosinophilia (rare).
  • Gastrointestinal — nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (common), dyspepsia (uncommon). Abdominal discomfort, tooth discolouration, and enamel hypoplasia in children (frequency unknown).
    • Rarely: dysphagia, oesophagitis, oesophageal irritation, pseudomembranous colitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated. (Advice to swallow the capsules with plenty of water, in an upright position, and well before going to bed helps to reduce the frequency of oesophagitis and oesophageal ulceration.)
  • Immune system disorders – hypersensitivity common (including anaphylaxis, angioedema, exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus, Henoch-Schonlein purpura). Rarely drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).
  • Hepatic disorders – hepatotoxicity, hepatitis, jaundice, hepatic failure (frequency unknown).
  • Renal disorders — blood urea increased (rare).
  • Skin — photosensitivity, rash (common).
    • Rarely: toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, exfoliative dermatitis, and fixed eruption.
  • Other common or very common adverse effects include:
    • Dyspnoea.
    • Hypotension
    • Peripheral oedema
    • Tachycardia.
  • Other rare adverse effects include:
    • Anxiety.
    • Arthralgia, myalgia.
    • Decreased appetite.
    • Flushing.
    • Pancreatitis.
    • Porphyria.
    • Severe headache and/or visual disturbances — may be an early symptom of benign intracranial hypertension, a rare but serious adverse effect. Headache is a relatively common side effect.
    • Tinnitus.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

What are the possible drug interactions with doxycycline?

  • Possible drug interactions with doxycycline include:
    • Aluminium, calcium, and magnesium preparations — the absorption of doxycycline may be impaired if it is taken with antacids containing aluminium, calcium, or magnesium, or other drugs containing these cations. 
      • Manufacturer advises separating administration by 2–3 hours.
    • Antiseizure medicines and barbiturates — the serum half-life of doxycycline may be shortened with concurrent use of barbiturates and antiseizure medicines such as carbamazepine or phenytoin.
      • Manufacturer advises considering increased doses of doxycycline.
    • Oral zinc, iron salts, or bismuth preparations — absorption of doxycycline may be impaired if it is taken with these preparations.
      • Manufacturer advises separating administration by 2–3 hours.
    • Retinoids — there is a possible increased risk of benign intracranial pressure if tetracyclines are used concurrently with retinoids (such as isotretinoin).
      • Avoid concurrent use.
    • Rifampicin — doxycycline levels are markedly reduced, which may lead to treatment failure. Monitor the effects and increase doxycycline dose if necessary.
    • Warfarin — concurrent treatment with co-trimoxazole may increase the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.
      • Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of tetracyclines.
    • Although the manufacturer describes a few cases of pregnancy or breakthrough bleeding attributed to the concurrent use of tetracycline antibiotics with oral contraceptives, there is no established interaction between doxycycline and oral hormonal contraception. 
    • However, advise women on the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the section on vomiting or diarrhoea in the CKS topics on Contraception - combined hormonal methods and Contraception - progestogen-only methods.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c]

Can doxycycline be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • Doxycycline is contraindicated in pregnancy [EMC, 2024c].
    • Effects on skeletal development have been documented in the first trimester in animal studies [BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024c], but first trimester tetracycline use has not been convincingly associated with increased risks of malformation or miscarriage in human pregnancy [UKTIS, 2024].
    • Administration during the second or third trimester may cause discoloration of the child’s teeth, and there is a theoretical risk of impaired skeletal development [BNF, 2024; UKTIS, 2024].
  • Breastfeeding
    • The manufacturer advises that doxycycline is contraindicated during breastfeeding as it may cause permanent discolouration of the teeth (yellow-grey-brown) [EMC, 2024c].
    • The NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS) states that concerns about bone deposition of tetracyclines and possible staining of infant’s dental enamel have not been confirmed and are unlikely during short-term use [SPS, 2024b]. In addition, absorption and therefore discoloration of teeth in the infant may be inhibited by calcium in the breastmilk [BNF, 2024; SPS, 2024b]
    • Short term use (a single course of less than 3 week’s duration) is acceptable for most tetracyclines, including doxycycline, with precautionary infant monitoring [SPS, 2024b].
      • Monitor for skin rashes, gastrointestinal disturbances (vomiting, diarrhoea) and candidiasis (oral thrush, nappy rash).
      • Compared with other tetracyclines, there is less binding of calcium to doxycycline in breast milk, which may result in increased infant absorption.

Erythromycin

What are the contraindications and cautions for erythromycin?

  • Do not prescribe erythromycin to people with:
    • Porphyria.
    • A history of QT interval prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia.
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation such as electrolyte disturbances (notably hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia) and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval.
  • Prescribe erythromycin with caution to people with:
    • Impaired hepatic function or those taking hepatotoxic drugs — erythromycin is principally excreted by the liver. 
    • Renal impairment — give a maximum of 1.5 g daily in severe renal impairment (due to the risk of ototoxicity). 
    • Myasthenia gravis — erythromycin may aggravate weakness symptoms.
    • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances or clinically relevant bradycardia.

[MHRA, 2020; BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024e]

What are the possible adverse effects of erythromycin?

  • The most common adverse effects of erythromycin are gastrointestinal and are dose-related. They include upper abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, pancreatitis, and anorexia.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis (an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridioides difficile) if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with erythromycin. See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
  • Reversible hearing loss (sometimes with tinnitus) can rarely occur after large doses of erythromycin.
  • Other adverse effects of erythromycin include:
    • Frequency not known — cerebral impairment.

[BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024e]

What are some possible drug interactions of erythromycin?

  • Drug interactions with erythromycin include:
    • Alprazolam — erythromycin is predicted to increase the exposure to alprazolam.
      • Manufacturer advises caution.
    • Aminophylline — aminophylline is predicted to cause hypokalaemia (potentially increasing the risk of Torsade de pointes) when given with erythromycin.
      • Manufacturer makes no recommendation.
    • Calcium channel blockers — erythromycin may increase serum levels of calcium channel blockers metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem).
      • Due to an increased risk of adverse effects, particularly hypotension, caution is advised with concurrent use.
    • Carbamazepine — erythromycin markedly increases the concentration of carbamazepine, leading to carbamazepine toxicity (which may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
      • Monitor carbamazepine levels, and adjust dose accordingly. 
      • Advise the person to report symptoms of carbamazepine toxicity.
    • Corticosteroids — levels of corticosteroids may be increased. Monitor for corticosteroid adverse effects (such as moon face, weight gain, hyperglycaemia), and adjust the corticosteroid dose or stop the macrolide as appropriate. 
    • CYP450 inducing medicines — Strong inducers of the cytochrome P450 metabolism system such as rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and St John's Wort may induce the metabolism of erythromycin leading to sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations, thereby decreasing the therapeutic effect.
    • Digoxin — erythromycin increases the concentration of digoxin.
      • Monitor digoxin concentration.
    • Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants) — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval.
      • Most manufacturers advise avoiding the use of two or more drugs that are associated with QT prolongation. Increasing age, female sex, cardiac disease, and some metabolic disturbances (notably hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia) also predispose to QT prolongation.
      • Seek advice from a microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
      • The manufacturer states that concurrent use of erythromycin with simvastatin, tolterodine, mizolastine, amisulpride, astemizole, terfenadine, domperidone, cisapride or pimozide is contraindicated.
    • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, short-acting beta2-agonists) — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
      • Seek advice from a microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
    • Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine — erythromycin is predicted to increase the risk of ergotism when given with ergotamine or dihydroergotamine and is contraindicated.
    • Lomitapide — concurrent use with erythromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy due to cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 inhibition [MHRA, 2014].   
      • For simvastatin (potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) — concurrent use is contraindicated. If erythromycin treatment cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin during the course of the treatment.
      • For atorvastatin (moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor) — avoid concurrent use if possible. If erythromycin treatment cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin during the course of the treatment or prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (that is 10 mg) and do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily. Advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • For pravastatin — prescribe erythromycin with caution, and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • Other statins — rosuvastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions, and clinically significant interaction with erythromycin is not expected for fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Theophylline — erythromycin decreases the clearance of theophylline, and theophylline potentially decreases the clearance of erythromycin.
      • Monitor theophylline levels. Consider a dose reduction of theophylline if toxicity is suspected (for example if headache, nausea, or palpitations occur).
    • Rivaroxaban — erythromycin may increase levels of rivaroxaban, increasing the risk of bleeding. 
    • Warfarin — erythromycin increases the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.
      • Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after a course of erythromycin.

[MHRA, 2020; BNF, 2024; EMC, 2024e]

Can erythromycin be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • The manufacturer advises that erythromycin should only be used during pregnancy if the potential benefit outweighs the risk [EMC, 2024e].
    • Available data for erythromycin does not suggest an increased risk of miscarriage, congenital malformation or cardiac malformation [UKTIS, 2020].
    • Certain infections arising during pregnancy can cause serious harm to both to the mother and baby if not treated appropriately. Where the benefits of treatment are expected to outweigh the risks, and where no suitable safe alternative is available, a macrolide can be used during pregnancy [UKTIS, 2020; MHRA, 2021].
  • Breastfeeding
    • Erythromycin passes into breast milk in small amounts, and therefore the infant dose received via breast milk is expected to be far lower than the paediatric therapeutic dose [LactMed, 2019; SPS, 2024a].
    • The manufacturer advises caution when erythromycin is being considered for use during breastfeeding [EMC, 2024e].
    • Inconclusive epidemiological evidence has suggested that there may be an increased risk of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants following maternal macrolide use whilst breastfeeding, especially in infants exposed in the first 2 weeks after birth [SPS, 2024a].
    • Erythromycin can be used during breastfeeding with precautionary infant monitoring for gastro-intestinal disturbances such as diarrhoea and vomiting, oral candida infection, rashes, sleep disturbances, irritability, sweating, and loss of appetite [SPS, 2024a].
  • Erythromycin is the macrolide of choice in pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Flucloxacillin

What are the contraindications and cautions for flucloxacillin?

  • Do not prescribe flucloxacillin to people with:
    • A true penicillin hypersensitivity.
      • Note that gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin. See the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for more information.
    • A hypersensitivity to cephalosporins — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity. 
    • A history of penicillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution in people with:
    • Hepatic impairment (especially if they are 50 years of age or older, or have a serious underlying disease).
    • Severe renal impairment — reduce the dose of flucloxacillin, or the dosing interval, if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2, due to the risk of neurotoxicity.

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2024]

What are the possible adverse effects of flucloxacillin?

  • The most common adverse effects of flucloxacillin are nausea, vomiting, skin rash, and diarrhoea.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis (an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridioides difficile) if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with flucloxacillin. See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
  • Anaphylaxis (delayed or immediate) is a serious but rare adverse effect of flucloxacillin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.
  • Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice may occur very rarely after treatment with flucloxacillin. These reactions are related neither to the dose nor to the route of administration of flucloxacillin, and the onset may be delayed for several weeks (up to 2 months) after treatment has stopped. Risk factors include treatment for more than 2 weeks and increasing age.
  • Other adverse effects of flucloxacillin include:
    • Rare or very rare — arthralgia, neutropenia (including agranulocytosis), thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, fever, myalgia, interstitial nephritis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2024]

What are the possible drug interactions with flucloxacillin?

  • Possible drug interactions with flucloxacillin include:
    • Paracetamol — concurrent use may increase the risk of high anion gap metabolic acidosis, particular in those with severe renal impairment, sepsis or malnutrition who are using the maximum recommended daily dose of paracetamol.
    • Caution and close monitoring is recommended by the manufacturer of flucloxacillin.
    • Methotrexate — methotrexate clearance may be reduced, causing an increased risk of toxicity, however, serious interactions are uncommon. 
    • Standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination in people on high-dose regimens. For people on low-dose regimens, consult local or national guidelines/protocols for monitoring and management.
    • Coumarin and indanedione anticoagulants (warfarin, phenidione) — consider increased monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the dose accordingly.
    • Posaconazole, voriconazole — concentrations of antifungal is greatly decreased. If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue). 
    • Probenecid, sulfinpyrazone — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of flucloxacillin.
    • Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
    • Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of penicillins.

    [EMC, 2023; BNF, 2024; Preston, 2024]

Can flucloxacillin be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding?

  • Pregnancy
    • Flucloxacillin is not known to be harmful in pregnancy [BNF, 2024].
    • Although evidence is limited for flucloxacillin specifically, the vast majority of a large amount of safety data for penicillins as a class do not indicate increased risks of congenital malformation, miscarriage, intrauterine death, low birth weight, preterm delivery, or neonatal complications [UKTIS, 2019].
    • Penicillins may be used in pregnancy [UKTIS, 2019].
  • Breastfeeding
    • Trace amounts of flucloxacillin are found in breastmilk, but it is appropriate to use in women who are breastfeeding [BNF, 2024].
    • Flucloxacillin is one of the preferred choices of antibiotic for breastfeeding women as there is more evidence and experience to support its use [SPS, 2024b].

Oral analgesia

Pentoxifylline

What are the contraindications and cautions for pentoxifylline?

  • Do not prescribe pentoxifylline to:
    • People with:
      • Recent cerebral haemorrhage.
      • Recent retinal haemorrhage.
      • Acute myocardial infarction.
      • Severe cardiac arrhythmias.
      • Acute porphyria. 
    • Pregnant women — the manufacturer does not recommend the use of pentoxifylline during pregnancy due to a lack of information on the use in human pregnancy. However, no untoward effects have been found in animal studies. 
  • Prescribe pentoxifylline with caution to:
    • People with:
      • Hypotension.
      • Coronary artery disease.
      • Diabetes (may lower blood glucose levels).
      • Severe hepatic impairment — manufacturer advises consideration of a dose reduction.
      • Renal impairment — reduce dose by 30–50% if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2.
    • Breastfeeding women — the manufacturer advises use only if the potential benefit outweighs the risk. Pentoxifylline passes into breast milk in minute quantities.

[EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

What are the adverse effects of pentoxifylline?

  • The following adverse effects have been reported in clinical trials or post-marketing studies (frequencies are unknown):
    • Arrhythmia, tachycardia, and angina.
    • Thrombocytopenia, leukopenia/neutropenia.
    • Dizziness, headache, aseptic meningitis (predominantly in people with underlying connective tissue disorders). 
    • Gastrointestinal disorder, epigastric discomfort, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, and hypersalivation.
    • Pruritus, erythema, urticaria, hot flush, and rash.
    • Anaphylactic reactions, anaphylactoid reaction, and angioedema.
    • Cholestasis.
    • Agitation and sleep disorder.
    • Bronchospasm.
    • Hypotension and haemorrhage.
      • A few very rare events of bleeding have been reported in people treated with pentoxifylline with and without anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors. The serious cases are predominantly concentrated in the gastrointestinal, genitourinary, multiple site, and surgical wound areas and are associated with bleeding risk factors. A causal relationship between pentoxifylline and bleeding has not been established. Thrombocytopenia has occurred in isolated cases.

[EMC, 2023b]

What are the possible drug interactions with pentoxifylline?

  • Possible drug interactions with pentoxifylline include:
    • Anticoagulants — post-marketing cases of increased anticoagulant activity have been reported in people concurrently treated with pentoxifylline and an anticoagulant.
      • Monitoring of anticoagulant activity in these people is recommended when pentoxifylline is introduced or the dose is changed.
    • Antihypertensive drugs — pentoxifylline may potentiate the effect of antihypertensive drugs.
      • The dose of the antihypertensive drug may need to be reduced. 
    • Antiplatelets (such as aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole) — concurrent use may result in an increased risk of bleeding.
      • The manufacturer of pentoxifylline advises that concurrent use should be done with caution.
    • Cimetidine — concurrent use with pentoxifylline may increase the plasma concentrations of pentoxifylline and the active metabolite lisofylline.
    • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) — concurrent use may result in an increased risk of bleeding.
      • The manufacturer of pentoxifylline advises caution with concurrent use.
    • Theophylline and aminophylline — concurrent use with pentoxifylline may increase theophylline or aminophylline levels. 
      • For theophylline, manufacturer advises to monitor and adjust dose.
      • For aminophylline, manufacturer advises to use with caution or avoid.
    • Ciprofloxacin — ciprofloxacin very slightly increases the exposure to pentoxifylline. 
      • Manufacturer advises to monitor for adverse effects. 
    • Fluvoxamine — fluvoxamine is predicted to increase the exposure to pentoxifylline.
      • Manufacturer makes no recommendation.

[EMC, 2023b; BNF, 2024]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the Wounds UK Best practice statement Compression hosiery; a patient-centric approach [Wounds UK, 2021], the Wounds UK guidance Compression hosiery for the prevention of recurrent leg ulceration: Evidence, efficacy and best practice [Wounds UK, 2025], the National Wound Care Strategy Programme consensus document Recommendations for lower limb ulcers [NWCSP, 2020], the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) HealthTech guidance Compression products for treating venous leg ulcers: late-stage assessment [NICE, 2025], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guideline Management of chronic venous leg ulcers [SIGN, 2010], the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline on Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020], the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency) [PCDS, 2023], a guideline from the Health Service Executive (HSE) of Ireland HSE National wound management guidelines [HSE, 2018], evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews [O'Meara, 2014; Shi, 2021; Fernandez, 2022; de Moraes Silva, 2024], and expert opinion in a textbook ABC of Wound Healing [Price, 2021]. 

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of venous leg ulcers.

Search dates

June 2019 - July 2024

Key search terms

The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCOhost MEDLINE (searched 4th June 2019). These were combined with filters to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and primary care relevant literature in EBSCOhost MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases. 

S3    S1 OR S2 
S2    AB ( ((venous n3 ulcer*) or (stasis ulcer*) or (varicose ulcer*) or (crural ulcer*) or (ulcus cruris) or (leg n2 ulcer*)) ) OR TI ( ((venous n3 ulcer*) or (stasis ulcer*) or (varicose ulcer*) or (crural ulcer*) or (ulcus cruris) or (leg n2 ulcer*)) ) 
S1    (MH "Leg Ulcer") OR (MH "Varicose Ulcer") 

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • Alavi, A., Sibbald, R.G., Phillips, T.J., et al. (2016) What's new: Management of venous leg ulcers: Treating venous leg ulcer. The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 74(4), 643-664. [Abstract]
  • Barnes, H. (2023) To explore the factors that impact on patient concordance with venous leg ulcer management using compression therapy. British Journal of Community Nursing 28((Sup3)), S8-S18. [Abstract]
  • BNF (2024) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Bonkemeyer Millan, S. and Gan, R. and Townsend, P.E. (2019) Venous Ulcers: Diagnosis and Treatment. American Family Physician 100(5), 298-305. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Bowers, S. and Franco, E. (2020) Chronic Wounds: Evaluation and Management. American Family Physician 101(3), 159-166. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Briggs, M. and Nelson, E.A. and Martyn-St James, M. (2012) Cochrane Review: Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers. Issue 11 (11). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • de Moraes Silva, M.A., Nelson, A., Bell-Syer, S.E., et al. (2024) Cochrane Review: Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers. Issue 3 (3). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • DermNet NZ (2018) Lipodermatosclerosis. New Zealand Dermatological Society. www.dermnetnz.org [Free Full-text]
  • Dumville, J.C., Worthy, G., Soares, M.O., et al. (2009) VenUS II: a randomised controlled trial of larval therapy in the management of leg ulcers. Health Technology Assessment 13(55). [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023) SPC for flucloxacillin 250 mg capsules, hard. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023b) SPC for Trental 400 mg Modified release Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024a) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024b) SPC for augmentin 625 mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024c) SPC for vibramycin-D dispersible tablets 100 mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024c) SPC for Co-Trimoxazole 80 mg/400 mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024e) SPC for Erythrocin 250 Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Fernandez, R., Green, H.L., Griffiths, R. and Atkinson, R.A. and Ellwood, L.J. (2022) Cochrane Review: Water for wound cleansing. Issue 9 (9). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Franks, P.J., Barker, J., Collier, M., et al. (2016) Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice. Journal Of Wound Care 25(6), S1-S67. [Free Full-text]
  • Gethin, G., Cowman, S. and Kolbach, D.N. (2015) Debridement for venous leg ulcers..
  • Grey, J.E. and Patel, G.K. (2021a) Venous and arterial leg ulcers. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G. and Harding, K. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 34-40.
  • Grey, J.E. and Patel, G.K. (2021b) Wound assessment. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G. and Harding, K. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 1-8.
  • Guest, J.F., Ayoub, N., McIlwraith, T., et al. (2017) Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service. International Wound Journal 14(2), 322-330. [Free Full-text]
  • Guest, J.F., Fuller, G.W. and Vowden, P. (2018) Venous leg ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes. International Wound Journal 15(1), 29-37. [Free Full-text]
  • Healy, B. and Freedman, A. (2021) Infections. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G. and Harding, K. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 56-63.
  • Holloway, S., Enoch, S. and Grey, J.E. (2021) Dressings and Devices. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G.K. and Harding, K.G. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 85-93.
  • HSE (2018) HSE National Wound Management Guidelines. Health Service Executive (HSE). https://www2.healthservice.hse.ie [Free Full-text]
  • Jull, A.B., Arroll, B., Parag, V. and Waters, J. (2012) Pentoxifylline for treating venous leg ulcers (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 12. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • LactMed (2019) Erythromycin. LactMed Drugs and Lactation Database. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501217
  • Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) (2021) Trimethoprim. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501286
  • LactMed (2022) Clarithromycin. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • Lattimer, C.R.,  Franceschi, C.,  Kalodiki, E. (2018) Optimizing calf muscle pump function. Phlebology 33(5), 353-360. [Abstract]
  • Lim, C.S., Baruah, M. and Bahia, S.S. (2018) Diagnosis and management of venous leg ulcers. BMJ 362.
  • MHRA (2014) Statins: interactions, and updated advice for atorvastatin. Drug Safety Update 1(6), 2. [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2020) Erythromycin: caution required due to cardiac risks (QT interval prolongation); drug interaction with rivaroxaban. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2021) Safety of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2013) Varicose veins: Diagnosis and management [CG 168]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2016) Chronic wounds: advanced wound dressings and antimicrobial dressings. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2020) Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2023) UrgoStart for treating diabetic foot ulcers and leg ulcers [MTG42]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2025) Compression products for treating venous leg ulcers: late-stage assessment. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Norman, G., Westby, M.J., Rithalia, A.D., et al. (2018) Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcer (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 06. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • NWCSP (2020) Recommendations for lower leg ulcers. National Wound Care Strategy Programme. http://www.nationalwoundcarestrategy.net [Free Full-text]
  • O'Meara, S., Al-Kurdi, D., Ologun, Y., et al. (2014) Cochrane Review: Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Patel, G.K. and Piguet, V. (2021) Uncommon causes of ulceration. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G. and Harding, K. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 49-55.
  • Patton, D., Avsar, P., Sayeh, A., et al. (2023) A meta-review of the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcer healing. Int Wound J 20(2), 430-447. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • PCDS (2023) Leg ulcers (and disorders of venous insufficiency). Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS). https://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C.L (2024) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
  • Price, A., Grey, J.E., Patel, G. and Harding, K. (2021) ABC of Wound Healing, Second Edition. BMJ Books.
  • Rabe, E., Partsch, H., Morrison, N., et al. (2020) Risks and contraindications of medical compression treatment - A critical reappraisal. An international consensus statement. Phlebology 35(7), 447-460. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Schultz, G. and Patel, G.K (2021) Drugs and biological approaches to wound healing. In: Price, A., Grey, J.E. and Patel, G. and Harding, K. (Eds.) ABC of Wound Healing. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 94-101.
  • Shi, C., Dumville, J.C., Cullum, N., et al. (2021) Cochrane Review: Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Issue 7 (7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • SIGN (2010) Management of chronic venous leg ulcers. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Singer, A.J., Tassiopoulos, A. and Kirsner, R.S. (2017) Evaluation and Management of Lower-Extremity Ulcers. New England Journal of Medicine 377(16), 1559-1567.
  • SPS (2024a) Using macrolide antibiotics during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS). https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • SPS (2024b) Using penicillin antibiotics during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • SPS (2024b) Using tetracycline antibiotics during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS). https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Tate, S., Price, A. and Harding, K. (2018) Dressings for venous leg ulcers. BMJ 362, K3115.
  • UKTIS (2019) Use of penicillins in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • UKTIS (2020) Use of macrolides in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • UKTIS (2023) Use of trimethoprim in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS). https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • UKTIS (2024) Use of tetracyclines in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
  • Vasudevan, B. (2014) Venous leg ulcers: Pathophysiology and Classification. Indian Dermatology Online Journal 5(3), 366-370. [Free Full-text]
  • Vivas, A., Lev-Tov, H. and Kirsner, R.S. (2016) Venous Leg Ulcers. Annals of Internal Medicine 165(3).
  • Wounds UK (2019) Best practice statement. Addressing complexities in the management of venous leg ulcers. Wounds UK. http://www.wounds-uk.com [Free Full-text]
  • Wounds UK; Fletcher, J., Atkin, L., Bolton, L., et al. (2021) Best Practice Statement: Compression hosiery: a patient-centric approach (third edition). Wounds UK. https://www.wounds-uk.com [Free Full-text]
  • Wounds UK (2023) Best Practice Statement: The use of compression therapy for peripheral oedema: considerations in people with heart failure. Wounds UK. https://wounds-uk.com [Free Full-text]
  • Wounds UK (2025) Compression hosiery for the prevention of recurrent leg ulceration: Evidence, efficacy and best practice. Woulds UK. http://www.wounds-uk.com [Free Full-text]
Change privacy settings