Men's health Pregnancy Sexual health Women's health
Contraception - sterilization
Last revised in February 2024
Sterilization is a form of contraception that permanently prevents a woman from getting pregnant.The operation to sterilize a man is vasectomy.
Contraception - sterilization: Summary
- Sterilization is considered a permanent method of contraception.
- The operation to sterilize a man is called a vasectomy.
- The operation to sterilize a woman is called tubal occlusion.
- If a person is considering sterilization:
- An assessment should be done to confirm the suitability of the method. As part of the assessment, the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use should be applied to assess the person's eligibility for use of the method.
- The person's level of understanding of the procedure should be assessed, as well as their mental capacity to make the decision and the risk for later regret.
- The partner's suitability for sterilization should also be assessed, as the couple's clinical history, present symptoms, and/or examination findings may influence which partner goes forward to have sterilization.
- Verbal and written information on the procedure should be provided, including information on the efficacy, advantages, disadvantages, and possible risks.
- Advice should be offered on other methods of contraception, such as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and their comparative efficacy.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 18 years to 60 years.
This CKS topic covers the general principles of male sterilization (vasectomy) and female sterilization (tubal occlusion).
This CKS topic does not cover the use of other methods of contraception or the management of women requesting emergency contraception. It also does not cover factors affecting the choice of contraception, such as comorbidities, reproductive history, drug treatments, and age; ethical and legal issues around contraception; safe sex advice; or assessment for sexually transmitted infections.
There are separate CKS topics on Amenorrhoea, Chlamydia - uncomplicated genital, Contraception - assessment, Contraception - barrier methods and spermicides, Contraception - combined hormonal methods, Contraception - emergency, Contraception - IUS/IUD, Contraception - natural family planning, Contraception - progestogen-only methods, Endometriosis, Infertility, Menorrhagia, and Pre-conception - advice and management.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
February 2024 — minor update. Information that Essure® micro-inserts have been discontinued has been added to this topic.
Previous changes
May 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic.
- No changes to clinical recommendations have been made, but the topic structure has been changed.
- The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators listed below have been removed as they were retired in April 2019 [BMS and NHS England, 2019]:
- CON001: The contractor establishes and maintains a register of women aged 54 or under who have been prescribed any method of contraception at least once in the last year, or other clinically appropriate interval, for example, the last 5 years for an IUS.
- CON003: The percentage of women, on the register, prescribed emergency hormonal contraception one or more times in the preceding 12 months by the contractor who have received information from the contractor about long-acting reversible contraception at the time or within one month of the prescription.
April to June 2016 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2016 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. Minor structural changes have been made to this topic.
June 2013 — minor update. The 2013 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
March 2013 — minor update. The telephone number for NHS Direct has been updated.
February to June 2012 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in December 2011 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made. However, recommendations have been rewritten for clarity, and superseded guidelines and manufacturers' Summary of Product Characteristics have been updated accordingly.
March 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.
February 2010 — updated to include the revised UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) published by the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH), formerly the Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Healthcare (FFPRHC). Issued in January 2010.
March 2009 — minor update. The QOF indicators for sexual health (2009) have been updated in the Goals and outcome measures section.
April to September 2007 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.
July 2006 — minor update. Information regarding orlistat and reduced efficacy of oral contraceptives has been included in the section on Drug interactions.
January 2006 — minor update. Gynol II Jelly, Microval tablets, and Duragel have been discontinued, and the prescriptions have been removed. Black triangle status has been removed from Cerazette®.
October 2005 — updated to include the new recommendations on missed pills from the FFPRHC Clinical Effectiveness Unit (2005).
April 2005 — minor update. Neogest® tablets have been discontinued, and the prescriptions have been removed. Issued in April 2005.
February 2005 — updated to include prescribing advice from the Committee on Safety of Medicines (2005) on the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception on bones.
September 2004 — updated to include the World Health Organization (WHO) Medical Eligibilty Criteria relating to contraception for 2004 and recent licence changes to Cerazette®. Delfen® contraceptive foam is being discontinued at the end of October 2004, and the prescriptions have been removed. Issued in September 2004.
January 2004 — reviewed. Validated in March 2004 and issued in June 2004.
January 2001 — rewritten. Validated in March 2001 and issued in June 2001. Guidance on emergency contraception is no longer included in the Contraception guidance but can be found as a separate CKS topic.
December 1997 — written.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 May 2021.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 May 2021.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 May 2021.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 May 2021.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 May 2021.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 May 2021.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 May 2021.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 May 2021.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Provide information and advice on male sterilization (vasectomy) and female sterilization (tubal occlusion), including information on efficacy, advantages, disadvantages, and possible risks.
- Provide appropriate post-sterilization follow-up and aftercare advice.
Outcome measures
Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.
QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.
QIPP - options for local implementation
NICE quality standards
- Women asking for contraception from contraceptive services are given information about, and offered a choice of, all methods including long-acting reversible contraception.
- Women asking for emergency contraception are told that an intrauterine device is more effective than an oral method.
- Women who request an abortion discuss contraception with a healthcare practitioner and are offered a choice of all methods when they are assessed for abortion and before discharge.
- Women who give birth are given information about, and offered a choice of, all contraceptive methods by their midwife within 7 days of delivery.
Background information
What is sterilization?
- Sterilization is considered a permanent method of contraception.
- The operation to sterilize a man is called a vasectomy.
- The operation to sterilize a woman is called tubal occlusion.
- Male sterilization can be achieved by the interruption of the vas deferens, preventing sperm from entering the ejaculate. The procedure is usually performed under local anaesthesia.
- The scalpel method of male sterilization involves making one or two incisions in the scrotal skin to expose the vas deferens, which is then occluded and divided.
- Minimally invasive vasectomy (MIV) was developed to increase the acceptability of vasectomy by eliminating the fear of incision. It involves making a puncture wound in the scrotal skin to access and occlude the vas deferens. A variety of surgical instruments (including a scalpel) may be used to open the skin 10 mm or less to expose the vas deferens, and the dissection area surrounding the vas deferens is minimized and does not require the use of skin sutures.
- Occlusion of the vas deferens is achieved by one of three methods:
- Coagulation/cauterization.
- Ligation with sutures or metal clips.
- Insertion of intra-vas devices or plugs.
- Female sterilization can be achieved by the occlusion or interruption of the fallopian tubes, preventing fertilization.
- The fallopian tubes can be accessed via laparoscopy, transcervical route (usually hysteroscopic techniques), mini-laparotomy (a small transverse lower abdominal incision), and during caesarean section operation.
- With laparoscopic sterilization, tubal rings or clips (such as Filshie clips) are used to occlude the fallopian tubes, or diathermy can be used to destroy a segment of the fallopian tubes. The procedure can be performed using general, regional, or local anaesthesia, but general anaesthesia is routinely used in the UK.
- With hysteroscopic sterilization, flexible Essure® micro-inserts are passed through a hysteroscope and inserted into the proximal section of each fallopian tube to occlude them. The procedure is usually done under local anaesthesia. Note: this product has now been discontinued, but the details retained for information.
- Mini-laparotomy is rarely performed but can be used if laparoscopic access has failed or is contraindicated. The fallopian tubes can be partially removed and ligated, or occluded with a tubal ring or clip.
- The fallopian tubes can be accessed via laparoscopy, transcervical route (usually hysteroscopic techniques), mini-laparotomy (a small transverse lower abdominal incision), and during caesarean section operation.
How effective is sterilization?
- Vasectomy
- The lifetime failure rate of vasectomy is approximately 1 in 2000 men (0.05%) following negative semen testing.
- Tubal occlusion
- The lifetime risk of laparoscopic tubal occlusion failure is estimated to be 1 in 200 women (0.5%).
- If a Filshie clip (the most common method used in the UK) is used, the failure rate 10 years after the procedure may be lower (1 in 333–500 women).
- The lifetime risk of laparoscopic tubal occlusion failure is estimated to be 1 in 200 women (0.5%).
What are the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of sterilization?
What are the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of male sterilization?
- Advantages
- It is very effective at preventing pregnancy.
- It is considered a permanent method of contraception.
- Disadvantages
- It requires a minor surgical procedure.
- Effective contraception is required until azoospermia is confirmed (12 weeks is the optimal time to schedule a post-vasectomy semen analysis [PVSA]).
- People may regret having had the procedure.
- The pre-sterilization assessment process is designed to ensure that people at risk for regret are identified and fully informed about alternative long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
- It cannot easily be reversed, and the NHS does not routinely offer reversal procedures.
- It does not protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
- Risks
- There is a small risk of haematoma and/or infection after the procedure.
- There is a risk of chronic post-vasectomy pain (CPVP), a postoperative testicular, scrotal, penile, or lower abdominal pain that occurs more than 3 months after the procedure and is rarely severe and persistent in some men. The incidence rate of CPVP ranges from 1–14%.
- Rarely, the procedure may fail and pregnancy can occur.
- Late failure is defined as the presence of sperm after confirmation of sterility (azoospermia or special clearance at PVSA).
- Male sterilization has been associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer, but this link is unlikely to be causal.
- Male sterilization does not increase the risk of impotence, testicular cancer, or heart disease.
What are the advantages, disadvantages, and risks associated with female sterilization?
- Advantages
- It is very effective at preventing pregnancy.
- It is considered a permanent method of contraception.
- Disadvantages
- It requires a surgical procedure.
- Effective contraception must be continued for a period of time following sterilization, depending on the method used.
- People may regret having had the procedure.
- The pre-sterilization assessment process is designed to ensure that people at risk for regret are identified and fully informed about alternative long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
- It cannot easily be reversed, and the NHS does not routinely offer reversal procedures.
- It does not protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
- Risks
- The procedure can fail, but this is uncommon.
- If the procedure fails, the resulting pregnancy may be ectopic.
- The risk varies depending on the method used, but the 10-year cumulative probability of ectopic pregnancy ranges from 2.4–7.3 per 1000 procedures.
- Laparoscopic sterilization is done under general anaesthesia, which is associated with several risks and complications.
- Other complications associated with laparoscopic surgery include injuries to the bowel, bladder, or blood vessels requiring laparotomy or leading to death.
- The risk of laparotomy as a consequence of a severe complication of laparoscopic surgery is about 2 per 1000 procedures.
- The risk of death with laparoscopy is about 1 in 12,000 procedures.
- Evidence suggests that there is an association between tubal occlusion and an increased risk of subsequent hysterectomy, but there is no evidence of causation.
- Women may report worsening menstrual symptoms following tubal occlusion, but there is no evidence to suggest a causal effect. There is no evidence that tubal occlusion results in significant changes to hormone levels.
- Female cancers:
- Tubal occlusion is not associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Evidence suggests that the procedure may have a protective effect against developing ovarian cancer that persists over time.
- There is no available evidence of an association between tubal occlusion and breast cancer.
- Available evidence suggests that there is no association between tubal occlusion and cervical or endometrial cancer risk.
Management
Scenario: Male sterilization (vasectomy)
From age 18 years to 60 years (Male).
How should l assess a man considering sterilization?
- If a man is considering sterilization:
- An assessment should be done to confirm the suitability of the method. As part of the assessment, the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use should be applied to assess his eligibility for use of the method.
- His level of understanding of the procedure should be assessed, as well as his mental capacity to make the decision and the risk for later regret.
- His partner's suitability for sterilization should also be assessed, as the couple's clinical history, present symptoms, and/or examination findings may influence which partner goes forward to have sterilization.
- See the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment for information on how to assess a man considering sterilization.
What information and advice should I give a man considering sterilization?
- Provide verbal and written information on male sterilization.
- This should include information on:
- The sterilization procedure.
- How effective male sterilization is at preventing pregnancy, including the failure rate relative to other methods of contraception, such as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
- The advantages and disadvantages of male sterilization.
- Alternative long-term reversible methods of contraception, including information on the advantages, disadvantages, and relative efficacy of each method.
- Information on male sterilization is available from several sources, including:
- The NHS website (www.nhs.uk).
- Sexwise, a website produced by the FPA (Family Planning Association) for the National Health Promotion Programme for Sexual Health and Reproductive Health (www.sexwise.org.uk).
- This should include information on:
- Provide information on male sterilization reversal and the success rate of reversal operations.
- Advise that:
- The NHS does not routinely offer reversal operations.
- Reported success rates (the presence of motile sperm in a post-operative semen sample) of reversal operations vary from 40% to over 97%.
- The success rate reduces the longer the time interval from the vasectomy.
- Advise that:
- After the procedure, provide follow-up and aftercare advice.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) clinical guideline Male and female sterilisation [CoSRH, 2014].
What follow-up and aftercare advice should I give a man who has had a vasectomy?
- Advise the man to:
- Seek medical help if he develops any health concerns following the procedure, such as:
- Persistent bleeding.
- Pain.
- Infection.
- Rapidly enlarging one-sided scrotal haematoma.
- Take a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for pain or discomfort following the procedure, unless contraindicated. See the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues for more information.
- Rest and refrain from strenuous activity until pain permits.
- Abstain from sexual activity for between 2–7 days after the procedure.
- Wear supportive underpants or athletic support for the first few days following the procedure, including at night for the initial 48 hours, or longer according to symptoms. This is to support the scrotum and reduce discomfort.
- Seek medical help if he develops any health concerns following the procedure, such as:
- Remind the man of the need to use effective contraception until azoospermia has been confirmed by post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA).
- Ensure that the man has been provided with instructions regarding PVSA and provided with sample bottles if PVSA postal samples are used.
- The way in which azoospermia is confirmed depends on local protocols, but the optimal time to schedule a PVSA is 12 weeks after the procedure.
- In a small minority of men, non-motile sperm persist after vasectomy. In such cases, 'special clearance' to stop contraception may be given when fewer than 100,000 non-motile sperm/mL are found in a fresh specimen examined at least 7 months after vasectomy.
Basis for recommendation
Scenario: Tubal occlusion
From age 18 years to 60 years (Female).
How should I assess a woman considering sterilization?
- If a woman is considering sterilization:
- An assessment should be done to confirm the suitability of the method. As part of the assessment, the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use should be applied to assess her eligibility for use of the method.
- Her level of understanding of the procedure should be assessed, as well as her mental capacity to make the decision and the risk for later regret.
- Her partner's suitability for sterilization should also be assessed, as the couple's clinical history, present symptoms, and/or examination findings may influence which partner goes forward to have sterilization.
- See the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment for information on how to assess a woman considering sterilization.
What information and advice should I give to a woman considering tubal occlusion?
- Provide verbal and written information on female sterilization.
- This should include information on:
- The sterilization procedure.
- How effective female sterilization is at preventing pregnancy, including the failure rate relative to other methods of contraception, such as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
- The advantages and disadvantages of female sterilization.
- Alternative long-term reversible methods of contraception, including information on the advantages, disadvantages, and relative efficacy of each method.
- Information on female sterilization is available from several sources, including:
- The NHS website (www.nhs.uk).
- Sexwise, a website produced by the FPA (Family Planning Association) for the National Health Promotion Programme for Sexual Health and Reproductive Health (www.sexwise.org.uk).
- This should include information on:
- Provide information on female sterilization reversal and the success rate of reversal operations.
- Advise that:
- The NHS does not routinely provide reversal operations.
- The success of reversal procedures depends on a number of factors including the age of the woman, the method used for tubal occlusion, and the method used for tubal re-anastomosis.
- Pregnancy rates following reversal range from 31–92%.
- Advise that:
- After the procedure, provide follow-up and aftercare advice.
Basis for recommendation
What follow-up and aftercare advice should I give a woman who has undergone tubal occlusion?
- Advise the woman:
- On appropriate self-care, including:
- Analgesia for pain or discomfort following the procedure. See the CKS topic on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain for more information.
- Wound care information, if appropriate — she should keep the incision clean and dry for 1–2 days.
- To avoid rigorous physical activity for 1 week after the procedure.
- To avoid sex for at least 1 week after the procedure.
- On when to seek medical help, including if she develops the following:
- Abdominal pain, especially if accompanied by temperature, loss of appetite, vomiting, and generally feeling unwell — may indicate a bowel perforation.
- Abdominal pain associated with missed periods — may indicate an ectopic pregnancy. See the CKS topic on Ectopic pregnancy for more information.
- A painful, red, swollen, warm calf, or difficult weight-bearing on the leg — may indicate deep vein thrombosis. See the CKS topic on Deep vein thrombosis for more information.
- Burning and stinging when passing urine, or urinating frequently — may indicate a urinary tract infection. See the CKS topic on Urinary tract infection (lower) - women for more information.
- Red and painful skin around the scars — may indicate skin infection. See the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute for more information.
- On appropriate self-care, including:
- Following laparoscopic sterilization:
- Advise women using combined hormonal contraception (CHC), the progestogen-only pill (POP), or non-hormonal contraception to continue their contraceptive method for at least 7 days after the procedure.
- If the procedure is scheduled for the hormone-free interval or day 1 of a cycle of CHC, the hormone-free interval should be omitted or CHC should be restarted, and CHC should be continued for at least 7 days after the procedure.
- Following hysteroscopic sterilization:
- Advise that additional contraception (such as condoms) will need to be used until successful placement of the micro-inserts and tubal occlusion is confirmed (by X-ray, ultrasound scan, or hysterosalpingogram) at least 3 months after the procedure.
Basis for recommendation
Supporting evidence
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of contraception - sterilization.
Search dates
September 2016 - April 2021
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp contraception/
- Exp Vasectomy/
- *Ligation, methods/
- *Sterilization,tubal methods/
- exp Sterilization/
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- CoSRH (2014) Male and female sterilisation: summary of recommendations. College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. http://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
- CoSRH (2015) Fertility awareness methods. College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. http://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2016) Contraception. QS129. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- RCOG (2015) Recovering well: information for you after a laparoscopy. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. http://www.rcog.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- SOGC (2015) Canadian contraception consensus (part 2 of 4). SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. http://sogc.org/clinical-practice-guidelines [Free Full-text]
- WHO (2011) Family planning: a global handbook for providers 2011 update. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int [Free Full-text]