Child health Skin and nail
Nappy rash
Last revised in May 2024
Nappy rash is an irritant contact dermatitis confined to the nappy area. Colonization with Candida albicans is usual.
Nappy rash: Summary
- Nappy rash is an acute inflammatory reaction of the skin in the nappy area.
- It is a form of irritant contact dermatitis caused by the interaction of several factors, including skin maceration (due to excessive hydration), prolonged skin contact with urine and faeces, friction between the skin and nappy, and resultant increased skin pH.
- Nappy rash is common in the first 2 years of life. The highest reported prevalence is in the 9–12-month age group, but it can occur at any age in people who routinely wear nappies.
- Risk factors for nappy rash include:
- Infrequent nappy changes.
- Non-absorbent and non-breathable nappies.
- Fragranced or alcohol-based wipes or topical preparations.
- Diarrhoea.
- Oral antibiotics.
- A diagnosis of nappy rash should be suspected if there are typical clinical features and differential diagnoses, such as eczema and scabies, have been excluded.
- The rash typically presents as well-defined areas of confluent erythema and scattered papules over convex surfaces in contact with the nappy (the buttocks, genitalia, suprapubic area, and upper thighs), with sparing of the inguinal skin creases and gluteal cleft.
- The child may appear distressed, agitated, or uncomfortable, as the rash may be itchy and painful.
- There may be skin erosions, oedema, and ulceration if there is severe involvement.
- Assessment should include:
- Asking about the location, nature, and duration of the rash; any previous episodes; and treatments tried, such as barrier preparations.
- Examining for oral candidiasis and features that may suggest candidal or bacterial secondary infection, especially if the rash is severe.
- Considering a skin swab if candidal or bacterial secondary infection is suspected.
- Management of nappy rash includes:
- Advising parents/carers on self-management strategies, such as frequent nappy changes, using absorbent and breathable nappies, cleaning the skin with water or fragrance- and alcohol-free baby wipes, and avoiding potential irritants (such as soaps and bubble baths).
- Recommending the use of a barrier preparation to protect the skin if there is mild erythema and the child is asymptomatic.
- Prescribing a topical steroid if the rash appears inflamed and is causing discomfort.
- Prescribing a topical imidazole cream if candida infection is suspected or confirmed on swab.
- Prescribing oral antibiotics if bacterial infection is suspected or confirmed on swab.
- Reviewing the child to assess the response to treatment.
- If the initial treatment is unsuccessful, possible causes of treatment failure should be managed, such as:
- Non-adherence to skin care advice or the treatment regimen.
- Candidal or bacterial secondary infection.
- An alternative cause for the rash.
- Referral to a paediatric dermatologist should be considered if:
- There is uncertainty about the diagnosis.
- The rash persists despite optimal treatment in primary care.
- There are recurrent, severe unexplained episodes.
Have I got the right topic?
From birth to 6 years.
This CKS topic covers the assessment and management of nappy rash in primary care.
This CKS topic does not cover the management of other conditions that may also cause a rash in the nappy area.
There are separate CKS topics on Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage, Candida - skin, Cellulitis - acute, Dermatitis - contact, Eczema - atopic, Impetigo, and Seborrhoeic dermatitis.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contraindicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.
Previous changes
January 2024 — minor update. Changes made to the section on Prescribing information.
October 2023 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2023 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.
July 2022 — minor update. Added drug interaction between clotrimazole and tacrolimus.
September 2020 — minor update. Reference to a branded barrier preparation has been removed from this topic.
June to July 2018 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in June 2018 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring. Sections on Complications and Prognosis have been added to the section on Background information, and the section on Differential diagnosis has been expanded. The recommendations in the section on Management have been updated in line with current literature. A section on Prescribing information has been added to this topic.
July 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in June 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made. There have been minor changes to the recommendations on topical treatments in the sections on Treatment and Treatment failure.
February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 Quality, Innovation, Productivity, and Prevention (QIPP) options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
Febriary 2012 — typographical error corrected in the section on Treatment.
June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
August 2010 — minor update. Sulconazole 1% cream (Exelderm®) has been discontinued. The prescription has been removed.
August 2009 — minor update. Advice to apply barrier preparations thinly has been added.
March to June 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
September 2008 — minor correction to the Changes section. Issued September 2008.
August 2008 — minor update. Nystatin cream and ointment have been discontinued. The prescriptions have been removed and relevant text amended.
July to September 2006 — reviewed. Validated in December 2006 and issued in January 2007.
July 2005 — minor update to drug rationales.
April 2005 — minor update. Tinaderm-M® cream (nystatin 100 000 units/g and tolnaftate 1% cream) has been discontinued. The prescription has been removed.
October 2003 — written. Validated in December 2003. Issued in February 2004.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 September 2023.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 September 2023.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 September 2023.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic review or meta-analysis since 1 September 2023.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 September 2023.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 September 2023.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 September 2023.
Changes in product availability
No changes to product availability since 1 September 2023.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Make an accurate diagnosis of nappy rash.
- Offer appropriate management in primary care.
- Refer for specialist dermatology opinion if appropriate.
- Provide self-management advice and information to parents and carers.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.
NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.Background information
What is it?
- Nappy rash (also known as napkin dermatitis) is an acute inflammatory reaction of the skin in the nappy area.
- It is a form of irritant contact dermatitis caused by the interaction of several factors, including prolonged skin contact with urine and faeces.
- Symptoms range from mild (persistent redness) to severe (destruction of the epidermis), and secondary infection may occur.
[Atherton, 2016; Blume-Peytavi, 2018; Carr, 2020; Dunk, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]
How common is it?
- Nappy rash is one of the most common skin conditions in infants [Atherton, 2016] [Blume-Peytavi, 2018] [Hebert, 2021; Dunk, 2022].
- The prevalence varies greatly between different studies (16–65%) depending on age, country, involved skin, care settings, skin care practices, or onset of toilet training [Stamatas, 2014; Carr, 2020; Reick, 2023].
- Given the short duration of nappy rash (typically 2–4 days), most cases are not seen by a medical professional; therefore, the prevalence is likely under-reported in the literature [Carr, 2020].
- Nappy rash is common in the first 2 years of life [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
- The highest reported prevalence is in the 9–12-month age group, but it can occur at any age in people who routinely wear nappies [Cohen, 2017].
- It affects up to 25% of nappy-wearing infants within the first four weeks and as much as 100% at some point in infancy [Ravanfar, 2012; Burdall, 2019].
- Both sexes are affected equally, and there is no ethnic variation in prevalence [Merrill, 2015].
- The incidence and severity of nappy rash have decreased since the introduction of super-absorbent disposable nappies and hypoallergenic skin care products [Atherton, 2016; Cohen, 2017].
What are the causes and risk factors?
- Nappy rash is a form of irritant contact dermatitis.
- The skin barrier function may be compromised by skin maceration (due to excessive hydration); prolonged skin contact with urine and faeces; friction between the skin and nappy; and resultant increased skin pH. These factors increase the risk of skin barrier disruption and percutaneous absorption of irritants, and activate faecal enzymes that further act as skin irritants.
- Skin irritation and alteration of its acidic pH predisposes to colonization and possible secondary infection with Candida albicans and bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci).
- Risk factors for nappy rash include:
- Younger age (2 years and younger) — younger children have relatively immature, thin skin, and a higher skin pH (compared with adult skin). They also urinate more frequently and raise fewer objections when wearing a wet or soiled nappy.
- Infrequent nappy changes — prolonged skin contact with urine and faeces, as well as diaper occlusion, can lead to skin breakdown.
- Type of nappy used — occlusion of the nappy area by non-absorbent and non-breathable nappies, or plastic underpants will increase the moisture within the nappy, exacerbating the process that can lead to skin breakdown.
- Skin care practices — soaps, detergents, fragranced and alcohol-based baby wipes, and topical baby care products may expose the skin to potential irritants. Other potential irritants include friction produced by the nappies and mechanical friction from over-vigorous cleaning.
- No nappy-free time — nappy-free time reduces skin contact with urine, faeces, moisture, and other irritants, and frictional damage from nappies.
- Increased stool volume — conditions associated with increased stool volume, such as diarrhoea, gastroenteritis, and malabsorption, may increase the risk of developing nappy rash.
- Oral antibiotics — oral antibiotics, in particular broad-spectrum antibiotics, may lead to diarrhoea and may also increase the risk of secondary fungal infections.
- Dermatological conditions — skin conditions, such as dry skin, eczema, and seborrheic dermatitis, can increase the risk of skin breakdown. Skin infections (bacterial or fungal) can increase the risk of developing nappy rash, including recalcitrant cases.
[Merrill, 2015; Atherton, 2016; Blume-Peytavi, 2018; Hebert, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]
What are the complications?
- Complications of nappy rash include:
- Pain — the child may be distressed, agitated, or uncomfortable, as the rash may be itchy and painful (particularly if severe).
- Candidal secondary infection. See the CKS topic on Candida - skin for more information.
- Bacterial secondary infection (most commonly Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci). See the CKS topics on Impetigo, Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage, and Cellulitis - acute for more information.
- Severe forms of nappy rash (uncommon/rare), including:
- Jacquet's erosive diaper dermatitis — presents with punched-out ulcers or erosions with elevated borders.
- Perianal pseudoverrucous papules and nodules — presents with multiple, shiny, smooth, red, moist, flat-topped papules or nodules in the nappy area, around the perianal skin, and involving genital, suprapubic, and buttock skin.
- Granuloma gluteale infantum — presents as 0.5–4 cm asymptomatic cherry-red plaques and nodules.
[Ravanfar, 2012; Ness, 2013; Coughlin, 2014; Cohen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]
What is the prognosis?
- Acute cases of nappy rash typically resolve within 1 week (typically 2–4 days) [Merrill, 2015; Carr, 2020].
- Nappy rash infected with Candida may take 10–21 days to resolve.
- If nappy rash is due to an underlying systemic or dermatological condition, the prognosis will depend on the specific condition and its treatment.
Assessment of nappy rash
How should I assess a child with suspected nappy rash?
- Take a history.
- Ask about:
- The location, nature, and duration of the rash.
- Any previous episodes.
- Any risk factors which predispose to nappy rash, such as infrequent nappy changes, use of non-absorbent and non-breathable nappies, use of fragranced or alcohol-based wipes, or recent diarrhoea or antibiotic use.
- Any treatments previously tried, such as barrier preparations or antifungal cream.
- Ask about:
- Examine the child.
- Look for typical features of nappy rash.
- The rash typically presents as well-defined areas of confluent erythema and scattered papules over convex surfaces in contact with the nappy (the buttocks, genitalia, suprapubic area, and upper thighs), with sparing of the inguinal skin creases and gluteal cleft.
- It may have a glazed appearance if acute, or fine scaling if more longstanding.
- There may be skin erosions, oedema, and ulceration if there is severe involvement.
- The child may appear distressed, agitated, or uncomfortable, as the rash may be itchy and painful (particularly if severe).
- Check for signs of oral candidiasis.
- If present and untreated, it increases the likelihood of candidal infection and recurrent nappy rash. See the CKS topic on Candida - oral for more information.
- Look for features that may suggest secondary infection, especially if the rash is persisting with skin care measures.
- Candidal — sharply marginated bright red patches or plaques around the perianal skin, which may involve the perineum, genitalia, thighs, and abdomen. Confluent zones of papules and pustules typically spread into the skin folds. There may be 'collarettes' of scale and satellite lesions. See the CKS topic on Candida - skin for more information.
- Bacterial — marked redness with exudate. There may be papules, pustules, blisters, folliculitis, and possible abscesses if severe. See the CKS topics on Impetigo, Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage, and Cellulitis - acute for more information.
- Look for typical features of nappy rash.
- Exclude other conditions that may present similarly to nappy rash, such as allergic contact dermatitis and eczema.
- Investigations are not normally needed to make a diagnosis of uncomplicated nappy rash.
- Consider taking a skin swab if candidal or bacterial secondary infection is suspected, especially if the nappy rash is severe.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on expert opinion in review articles Diaper dermatitis: a review and update [Ravanfar, 2012], Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis [Coughlin, 2014], Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management [Stamatas, 2014], Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis [Merrill, 2015], Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis [Van Gysel, 2016], Differential diagnosis of diaper dermatitis [Cohen, 2017], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guide Nappy rash [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
When to arrange skin swabs
- Skin swabs are not generally recommended for the management of nappy rash as the results are difficult to interpret. In addition, both Candida and bacteria (such as Staphylococcus aureus and streptococcus) colonize healthy skin, and a skin swab may be positive when infection is not present.
- However, a skin swab for culture and sensitivity may be helpful if an underlying infection is suspected, to confirm the diagnosis and guide management [Merrill, 2015; Van Gysel, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. The same culture swab can be used for culturing both fungus and bacteria [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
What else might it be?
- Conditions that may present similarly to nappy rash include:
- Allergic contact dermatitis — occurs when the skin is sensitized to a specific irritant or allergen following exposure. There is a characteristic pattern of distribution affecting skin areas exposed to the trigger. See the CKS topic on Dermatitis - contact for more information.
- Atopic eczema — a tendency to dry skin, a positive family history of atopic eczema, and rash affecting other skin areas (such as the flexures) may suggest the diagnosis. See the CKS topic on Eczema - atopic for more information.
- Eczema herpeticum — disseminated herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection presents with painful crops of uniform vesicles or blisters on an erythematous base, which becomes pustular and crust over. Lesions may be haemorrhagic, and the child may have a fever and be systemically unwell. See the CKS topic on Eczema - atopic for more information.
- Fungal skin infection — tinea corporis can present with a localized eruption in the nappy area. There may be slowly expanding itchy red or pink annular lesions, usually single or asymmetric in distribution. In the groin, there may be a uniform scale without typical 'central clearing'. The penis and scrotum are often spared in boys. See the CKS topic on Fungal skin infection - body and groin for more information.
- Lichen sclerosus — presents as shiny, atrophic, well-defined ivory-white patches affecting the perineum and perianal regions in a 'figure-of-eight' distribution in girls, and the foreskin in boys. See the CKS topic on Pruritus vulvae for more information.
- Psoriasis — presents with thick silvery scales in the groin and gluteal cleft, accompanied by nail abnormalities. See the CKS topic on Psoriasis for more information.
- Scabies — typically presents with intensely itchy burrows, red and inflamed papules, nodules, and excoriations on the lower half of the buttocks and genitalia, as well as the wrists, ankles, finger and toe webs, palms, and soles. See the CKS topic on Scabies for more information.
- Seborrhoeic dermatitis — characterized by erythematous papules and plaques associated with yellow scales in the nappy area, and cradle cap. See the CKS topic on Seborrhoeic dermatitis for more information.
- Perianal streptococcal dermatitis — presents as a bright red, sharply demarcated, perianal rash with possible maceration that may involve the penis and vulvovaginal area. Perianal pain and itching are common, and defecation may be painful.
- Miliaria rubra (heat rash) — typically causes an itchy rash of multiple, pinpoint (1–2 mm) red papules or fragile vesicopustules. Commonly affected areas include the neck, intertriginous sites, and thighs (where the elastic of disposable nappies comes into contact with the skin).
- Zinc deficiency — more common in premature infants and is associated with red patches and plaques with accentuated golden-brown scale at the margin. There may be erosive lesions affecting the perineal, peri-oral, and palmar areas, and it may present with diarrhoea and faltering growth.
Basis for recommendation
The information on differential diagnoses of nappy rash is based on expert opinion in the narrative review articles Diaper dermatitis: a review and update [Ravanfar, 2012], Neonatal skin care: a concise review [Ness, 2013], Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis [Coughlin, 2014], Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis [Merrill, 2015], Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis [Van Gysel, 2016], Differential diagnosis of diaper dermatitis [Cohen, 2017], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guide Nappy rash [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Management
Scenario: Management of nappy rash
From birth to 6 years.
How should I initially manage a child with nappy rash?
- Advise parents/carers on the following self-management strategies:
- Consider using nappies with high absorbency (for example disposable gel matrix nappies).
- Ensure the nappy fits properly (too tight increases skin occlusion, too loose minimizes absorption of fluids).
- Parental/carer choice will depend on issues such as convenience, cost, and environmental impact.
- Leave nappies off for as long as possible to reduce skin contact with urine, faeces, moisture, and other irritants, and frictional damage from nappies.
- Change nappies every 2–3 hours, or as soon as possible after wetting or soiling, to reduce skin exposure to urine and faeces.
- Clean the skin with water, or fragrance and alcohol-free baby wipes.
- Dry the skin gently after cleaning — avoid vigorous rubbing.
- Bath the child daily — avoid excessive bathing (such as more than twice a day) as this may dry the skin excessively.
- Avoid using soap, bubble baths, lotions, talcum powder, or topical antibiotics, which can have an irritant effect.
- Avoid the use of plastic underpants over the nappy.
- Consider using nappies with high absorbency (for example disposable gel matrix nappies).
- Advise on sources of written information and support.
- NHS A-Z has an information leaflet on Nappy rash.
- If there is mild erythema and the child is asymptomatic:
- Advise on the use of a barrier preparation to protect the skin.
- The barrier preparation should be applied thinly at each nappy change.
- A range of options are available to buy over-the-counter, including Zinc and Castor Oil ointment and white soft paraffin BP ointment.
- Advise on the use of a barrier preparation to protect the skin.
- If the rash appears inflamed and is causing discomfort in a child aged 1 month or over:
- Consider prescribing hydrocortisone 1% cream in addition to the barrier preparation.
- A thin layer of topical corticosteroid should be applied once a day until symptoms settle or for a maximum of 7 days.
- The barrier preparation should be applied a few minutes after applying the topical corticosteroid
- See the CKS topic on Corticosteroids - topical (skin), nose, and eyes for prescribing information on hydrocortisone cream.
- Consider prescribing hydrocortisone 1% cream in addition to the barrier preparation.
- If the rash persists and candidal infection is suspected or confirmed on swab:
- Prescribe a topical imidazole cream (clotrimazole, econazole, or miconazole).
- Advise against the use of a barrier preparation until the candidal infection has settled.
- See the section on Topical imidazoles for prescribing information.
- Prescribe a topical imidazole cream (clotrimazole, econazole, or miconazole).
- If the rash persists and bacterial infection is suspected or confirmed by swab:
- Prescribe an oral antibiotic.
- Prescribe flucloxacillin solution for 7 days.
- If the child is allergic to penicillin, prescribe clarithromycin suspension for 7 days.
- Adjust the choice of antibiotic if indicated, depending on swab results.
- See the sections on Flucloxacillin and Clarithromycin for prescribing information.
- Prescribe an oral antibiotic.
- Review the child to assess the response to treatment (with time interval dependent on clinical judgement).
- If symptoms are not settling, see the section on Treatment failure and referral for management information.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on a cross-sectional study Diaper dermatitis prevalence and severity: Global perspective on the impact of caregiver behavior [Carr, 2020], and expert opinion found in the narrative reviews Neonatal skin care: Developments in care to maintain neonatal barrier function and prevention of diaper dermatitis [Burdall, 2019], A new therapeutic horizon in diaper dermatitis: Novel agents with novel action [Hebert, 2021], Baby wipes and nappy rash - what is the relationship? A review [Mactaggart, 2021], Neonatal skin care: a concise review [Ness, 2013], Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis [Coughlin, 2014], Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management [Stamatas, 2014], Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis [Merrill, 2015], Understanding irritant napkin dermatitis [Atherton, 2016], Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis [Van Gysel, 2016], Differential diagnosis of diaper dermatitis [Cohen, 2017], Prevention and treatment of diaper dermatitis [Blume-Peytavi, 2018], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guide Nappy rash [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Barrier preparations
- The recommendation to apply the barrier preparation as a thin layer is pragmatic, based on the consideration that applying a moisture barrier layer too thickly may cause water retention and worsen any skin maceration.
Skin cleansing methods
- A literature review on neonatal skin care in intensive care settings found no evidence of the superiority of one cleansing method over another, but neither the use of wipes nor water increased the prevalence of nappy rash [Burdall, 2019].
- A literature review on the effect of using baby wipes compared with water and cloth in terms of nappy rash found that baby wipes were deemed superior to water and cloth in most of the literature. However, no definitive conclusion could be drawn as many studies were industry-funded [Mactaggart, 2021]. The authors highlighted that not all allergens are listed on the label accurately, which can be misleading for consumers.
Managing candidal infection
- CKS found no good quality evidence for the comparative effectiveness of different topical imidazole preparations for managing nappy rash.
- The recommendation to stop using a barrier preparation when using a topical imidazole to treat candidal infection is based on limited evidence from a US review article on infant skin care, which suggests that the rash may worsen if a water-resistant barrier preparation is used before the underlying infection is treated [Lund, 1999]. This recommendation was supported by previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic.
How should I manage treatment failure?
- If the nappy rash is not improving following initial management:
- Consider and, if possible, manage any underlying cause of treatment failure, including:
- Non-adherence to self-care advice or the treatment regimen.
- Candidal or bacterial secondary infection — take a skin swab for culture and sensitivity, and manage accordingly.
- An alternative cause for the rash.
- An immunocompromised host.
- If the rash persists following treatment for secondary infection:
- Adjust the choice of topical imidazole or oral antibiotic if indicated, depending on swab results.
- Seek specialist advice from a medical microbiologist if the rash has not responded to appropriate treatment.
- Consider referral to a paediatric dermatologist if:
- There is uncertainty about the diagnosis.
- The rash persists despite optimal treatment in primary care.
- There are recurrent, severe unexplained episodes.
- Consider and, if possible, manage any underlying cause of treatment failure, including:
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on expert opinion in review articles Diaper dermatitis: a review and update [Ravanfar, 2012], Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis [Coughlin, 2014], Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis [Merrill, 2015], Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis [Van Gysel, 2016], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guide Nappy rash [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Referral
- Further investigations, such as patch testing, may be helpful if there is refractory nappy rash, to exclude conditions such as allergic contact dermatitis with sensitization to specific allergens [Ravanfar, 2012; Coughlin, 2014; Van Gysel, 2016].
- Nappy rash with atypical features and negative swab results may require further specialist investigations, such as a skin biopsy [Van Gysel, 2016].
- Recurrent and refractory cases of nappy rash may require systemic antifungal treatment. If the rash is severe or chronic with erosions or ulceration, this may be a sign of underlying immunocompromise, which requires further investigation [Coughlin, 2014; Van Gysel, 2016].
- The recommendation to consider seeking advice from a medical microbiologist if nappy rash does not respond to appropriate imidazole or antibiotic treatment in primary care is pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section, specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Topical imidazoles
Dosages
Topical imidazoles should be applied thinly and evenly to prevent moisture entrapment.
- Topical clotrimazole 1% is licensed for treating candidal nappy rash.
- The cream should be applied 2–3 times daily and rubbed in gently.
- Treatment should be continued for at least 2 weeks.
- Topical miconazole 2% is licensed for treating fungal skin infections.
- The cream should be applied twice daily and rubbed in gently.
- The duration of treatment varies from 2–6 weeks depending on the localization and the severity of the lesion.
- Treatment should be continued for at least 1 week after the disappearance of all signs and symptoms.
- Topical econazole 1% is licensed for treating fungal skin infections.
- The cream should be applied twice daily and rubbed in gently.
- The usual treatment duration is 2–4 weeks. If no improvement in symptoms is experienced after 4 weeks, the treatment should be reassessed.
Cautions
- Advise parents/carers:
- To avoid contact with the eyes and mucous membranes during the use of topical imidazoles.
- That they should not smoke or go near naked flames whilst applying clotrimazole cream.
- The manufacturer advises that fabric (such as clothing, bedding, and dressings) that has been in contact with the product burns more easily and is a serious fire hazard.
- Washing may reduce product build-up but not totally remove it.
Adverse effects
- Topical imidazoles are generally well tolerated.
- Rash, erythema, itch, mild burning sensation, and hypersensitivity reactions may occur. Treatment should be discontinued if these are severe.
Drug interactions
- Oral anticoagulants (such as warfarin) — oral miconazole and econazole are known to inhibit CYP450 enzymes. Due to the limited systemic availability after topical application, clinically relevant interactions are rare. However, the effect of oral anticoagulants (such as warfarin) may be enhanced by topical miconazole or econazole.
- Monitor the international normalised ratio (INR) during concurrent use of topical miconazole or econazole with an oral anticoagulant, and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
Flucloxacillin
Dosages
- The recommended dosages of flucloxacillin for children with infected nappy rash are:
- Age 1 month to 1 year — 62.5 mg to 125 mg four times daily for 7 days.
- Age 2–9 years — 125 mg to 250 mg four times daily for 7 days.
- In children with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 10 ml/minute):
- Consider a dose reduction or an extension of the dosing interval due to the risk of neurotoxicity.
- Flucloxacillin should be taken 1 hour before food or on an empty stomach.
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe flucloxacillin to children with:
- A true penicillin hypersensitivity — gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute a true penicillin allergy.
- History of urticaria or rash immediately after penicillin administration — risk of immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins.
- History of a severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction (for example, anaphylaxis) to cephalosporins — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity between cephalosporins and penicillins.
- History of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice/hepatic dysfunction.
- Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution to children with:
- History of a minor rash (non-confluent, non-pruritic rash restricted to a small area of the body) or a rash that occurs more than 72 hours after administration of a penicillin — possibility of an allergic reaction to penicillins.
- History of allergy to cephalosporins or other medications.
- History of atopic allergy (including asthma, eczema, or hay fever) — high risk of anaphylactic reactions to penicillins.
- Hepatic impairment, especially if they have a serious underlying disease.
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 10 ml/minute) — consider a dose reduction or an extension of the dosing interval due to the risk of neurotoxicity.
Adverse effects
- For all penicillins
- The most common adverse effects are:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting.
- Skin reactions.
- Thrombocytopenia.
- The most significant adverse effect is hypersensitivity, which causes rashes and anaphylaxis and can be fatal.
- Allergic reactions occur in 1–10% of people treated with a penicillin; anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of people.
- People with a history of atopic allergy (for example, asthma, eczema, and hay fever) are at a higher risk of anaphylactic reactions to penicillins.
- People with a history of anaphylaxis, urticaria, or rash immediately after penicillin administration are at risk of immediate hypersensitivity and should not take flucloxacillin.
- People with a history of a minor rash (non-confluent, non-pruritic rash restricted to a small area of the body) or a rash that occurs more than 72 hours after penicillin administration are probably not allergic to penicillin. Flucloxacillin should not be withheld unnecessarily for serious infections, but the possibility of an allergic reaction should be noted. Other beta-lactam antibiotics (including cephalosporins) can be used.
- People allergic to one penicillin will be allergic to all because the hypersensitivity is related to the basic penicillin structure.
- People with a history of immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins may also react to cephalosporins and other beta-lactam antibiotics and so should not receive these antibiotics. There is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity of penicillins and cephalosporins.
- If a penicillin (or another beta-lactam) antibiotic is essential in a person with immediate hypersensitivity to penicillins, specialist advice should be sought on hypersensitivity testing or using a beta-lactam antibiotic with a different structure to the penicillin that caused the hypersensitivity.
- Antibiotic-associated colitis has been reported and may range in severity from mild to life-threatening.
- Consider this diagnosis in children who present with diarrhoea during or after treatment with any antibiotic.
- The risk is increased with longer durations of antibiotic treatments, multiple antibiotics prescribed concurrently, or multiple courses of antibiotics.
- See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — arthralgia and leucopenia.
- Rare or very rare — agranulocytosis, angioedema, haemolytic anaemia, hepatic disorders, nephritis tubulointerstitial, neutropenia, seizure, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).
- The most common adverse effects are:
- For flucloxacillin
- Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported.
- These reactions are unrelated to the dose or route of administration of flucloxacillin.
- The onset of these hepatic effects may be delayed for up to two months post-treatment; in several cases, the course of the reactions has been protracted and lasted for some months.
- In very rare cases, a fatal outcome has been reported. Most reports of deaths have been in people aged 50 years and older and people with serious underlying disease.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Rare or very rare — eosinophilia, fever, and myalgia.
- Frequency not known — hypokalaemia, oesophageal disorder, oral pain, oropharyngeal pain, and throat irritation.
- Hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported.
Drug interactions
- Drug interactions of flucloxacillin include:
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
- Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to the vaccine may be reduced.
- Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
- Methotrexate — reduced clearance and acute methotrexate toxicity have been attributed to concurrent use with some penicillins. Serious interactions are uncommon, but risk factors are as yet unknown. People taking low-dose methotrexate have been affected.
- High-dose methotrexate: standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination, which should be managed according to local guidelines.
- Low-dose methotrexate: consult local or national guidelines for recommendations on appropriate monitoring and management.
- Paracetamol — paracetamol has been reported to cause high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) when given with flucloxacillin.
- Be alert for signs and symptoms of HAGMA.
- Risk factors include severe renal impairment, sepsis, or malnutrition, especially if the maximum daily doses of paracetamol are used.
- On stopping paracetamol, HAGMA may persist with flucloxacillin alone.
- Phenidione — flucloxacillin is predicted to increase the risk of bleeding when given with phenindione.
- Consider increased monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) if flucloxacillin is started or stopped.
- Posaconazole and voriconazole — flucloxacillin (particularly high doses) appears to greatly decrease the concentrations of these antifungals.
- If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue).
- Probenecid — probenecid reduces the excretion of penicillins and usually increases their concentrations.
- Concurrent use with flucloxacillin can be beneficial. However, consider any detrimental effect elevated flucloxacillin concentrations may have on the child.
- Warfarin — flucloxacillin decreases the INR in people taking warfarin.
- Consider an interaction if otherwise unexplained decreases in INR occur.
- Monitor and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
- Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced.
Clarithromycin
Dosages
- The recommended dosages of clarithromycin for infected nappy rash in children aged 1 month to 11 years are:
- Body weight up to 8 kg — 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 7 days.
- Body weight 8–11 kg — 62.5 mg twice daily for 7 days.
- Body weight 12–19 kg — 125 mg twice daily for 7 days.
- Body weight 20–29 kg — 187.5 mg twice daily for 7 days.
- Body weight 30–40 kg — 250 mg twice daily for 7 days.
- In children with renal impairment:
- Use half the usual dosage if creatinine clearance (CrCl) is less than 30 mL/minute.
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe clarithromycin to children with:
- Electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia) — risk of prolongation of the QT interval.
- A history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including torsades de pointes arrhythmias.
- Severe hepatic impairment in combination with renal impairment.
- Prescribe clarithromycin with caution to children with:
- Impaired hepatic function (or concurrently taking potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver.
- Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, conduction disturbances, or clinically relevant bradycardia — risk of QT interval prolongation.
- Myasthenia gravis — may aggravate symptoms.
- Renal impairment — use half the usual dosage if creatinine clearance (CrCl) is less than 30 mL/minute.
- Be aware of severe drug interactions with clarithromycin.
Adverse effects
- For all macrolides
- The most common adverse effects are:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dyspepsia.
- Decreased appetite and altered taste.
- Dizziness, headache, vasodilation, and vision disorders.
- Hearing impairment.
- Insomnia.
- Pancreatitis.
- Paraesthesia and skin reactions.
- Antibiotic-associated colitis has been reported and may range in severity from mild to life-threatening.
- Consider this diagnosis in children who present with diarrhoea during or after treatment with any antibiotic.
- The risk is increased with longer durations of antibiotic treatments, multiple antibiotics prescribed concurrently, or multiple courses of antibiotics.
- See the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated for more information.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — angioedema, anxiety, arrhythmias, candidal infection, chest pain, constipation, drowsiness, eosinophilia, hepatic disorders, leucopenia, neutropenia, palpitations, QT interval prolongation, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), tinnitus, and vertigo.
- Rare or very rare — myasthenia gravis and nephritis tubulointerstitial.
- Frequency not known — altered smell, hallucination, hypotension, seizure, thrombocytopenia, and tongue discolouration.
- The most common adverse effects are:
- For clarithromycin
- Hepatic dysfunction has been reported.
- This includes increased liver enzymes, and hepatocellular and/or cholestatic hepatitis with or without jaundice.
- Hepatic dysfunction may be severe and is usually reversible. Cases of fatal hepatic failure have been reported.
- Advise parents/carers to stop clarithromycin treatment and seek medical advice if signs and symptoms of hepatic disease develop, such as anorexia, jaundice, dark urine, pruritus, or tender abdomen.
- Other possible adverse effects include:
- Uncommon — burping, dry mouth, epistaxis, muscle complaints, oral disorders, thrombocytosis, and tremor.
- Frequency not known — abnormal dreams, agranulocytosis, depersonalization, depression, mania, myopathy, psychotic disorder, renal failure, tooth discolouration, and urine discolouration.
- Hepatic dysfunction has been reported.
Drug interactions
- Drug interactions of clarithromycin include:
- Antidiabetic drugs — concurrent use with oral hypoglycaemic drugs (such as sulfonylureas) or insulin can result in significant hypoglycaemia.
- Monitor blood glucose levels closely, and adjust the antidiabetic dose accordingly.
- Calcium channel blockers — clarithromycin possibly inhibits the metabolism of calcium channel blockers, such as verapamil and amlodipine, increasing the risk of hypotension and other adverse effects.
- Monitor for hypotension and other adverse effects, and adjust the dose of the calcium channel blocker if necessary.
- Digoxin — clarithromycin increases the plasma concentration of digoxin.
- Monitor for signs of digoxin adverse effects (bradycardia).
- Measure digoxin concentrations, and adjust the dose if problems develop.
- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) — clarithromycin increases the exposure to dabigatran, slightly increases the exposure to apixaban, and is predicted to increase the exposure to edoxaban.
- Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding or anaemia, especially in children with renal impairment.
- Drugs that prolong the QT interval — clarithromycin can prolong the QT interval. Concurrent use with other drugs that prolong QT intervals can increase the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and torsades de pointes.
- Concurrent use with domperidone, ivabradine, or pimozide is contraindicated. Seek advice from a medical microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic.
- Most manufacturers advise avoiding the use of two or more drugs that are associated with QT prolongation.
- Increasing age, female sex, cardiac disease, and some metabolic disturbances (notably hypokalaemia) predispose to QT prolongation.
- Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics) — concurrent use with clarithromycin can predispose to QT prolongation.
- Monitor potassium concentrations closely.
- Drugs that induce cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) enzyme — concurrent use may decrease plasma concentrations of clarithromycin, leading to sub-therapeutic levels and reduced efficacy.
- Monitor concurrent use of clarithromycin and CYP3A4 enzyme inducers, such as rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and St. John's wort.
- It may also be necessary to monitor the plasma levels of the CYP3A4 inducer, which could be increased due to the inhibition of CYP3A4 by clarithromycin. For example, concurrent treatment with rifabutin and clarithromycin increases rifabutin levels and decreases clarithromycin levels.
- Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
- Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
- Statins — clarithromycin is a CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitor. Concurrent use with a statin metabolized by CYP3A4 will increase the plasma concentration of the statin, leading to an increased risk of myopathy (including rhabdomyolysis) [MHRA, 2014].
- Simvastatin is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Concurrent use with clarithromycin is contraindicated. If clarithromycin treatment cannot be avoided, withhold simvastatin for the duration of the clarithromycin course.
- Atorvastatin is moderately metabolized by CYP3A4. Avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, do not exceed 20 mg of atorvastatin daily. Advise parents/carers to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Pravastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. However, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advises caution with clarithromycin. Advise parents/carers to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Rosuvastatin is not associated with cytochrome P450 interactions. Nevertheless, advise parents/carers to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
- Fluvastatin is not dependent on CYP3A metabolism. Nevertheless, advise parents/carers to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness [EMC, 2023b].
- Other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 — concurrent use with clarithromycin may increase plasma concentrations of the concurrent drug, leading to increased or prolonged therapeutic and adverse effects of the concurrent drug.
- Concurrent use with domperidone, pimozide, or terfenadine is contraindicated due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and torsades de pointes.
- Concurrent use with ergot alkaloids, oral midazolam, colchicine, ticagrelor, or ranolazine is contraindicated.
- Concurrent use of clarithromycin with other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 should be done with caution, especially if the other drug has a narrow safety margin (such as carbamazepine) or is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Dosage adjustments may be considered, and when possible, serum concentrations of the CYP3A4 substrate should be monitored closely.
- Warfarin — clarithromycin may enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.
- Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) closely, and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
- Antidiabetic drugs — concurrent use with oral hypoglycaemic drugs (such as sulfonylureas) or insulin can result in significant hypoglycaemia.
- For further information on drug interactions of clarithromycin, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary for Children (BNFc).
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on expert opinion on a cross-sectional study Diaper dermatitis prevalence and severity: Global perspective on the impact of caregiver behavior [Carr, 2020], and expert opinion found in the narrative reviews Neonatal skin care: Developments in care to maintain neonatal barrier function and prevention of diaper dermatitis [Burdall, 2019], A new therapeutic horizon in diaper dermatitis: Novel agents with novel action [Hebert, 2021], Baby wipes and nappy rash - what is the relationship? A review [Mactaggart, 2021], Neonatal skin care: a concise review [Ness, 2013], Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis [Coughlin, 2014], Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management [Stamatas, 2014], Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis [Merrill, 2015], Understanding irritant napkin dermatitis [Atherton, 2016], Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis [Van Gysel, 2016], Differential diagnosis of diaper dermatitis [Cohen, 2017], Prevention and treatment of diaper dermatitis [Blume-Peytavi, 2018], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice guide Nappy rash [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. The rationale for the individual recommendations is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation sections.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of nappy rash. Additional searches were carried out for:
- topical antifungal agents
- oral antibiotics
Search dates
June 2018 - Septmeber 2023
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCO Medline.
- (MH "Diaper Rash")
- AB ( (nappy or nappies or napkin* or diaper*) N3 (rash* or dermatitis or candid*) ) OR TI ( (nappy or nappies or napkin* or diaper*) N3 (rash* or dermatitis or candid*) )
- (MH "Antifungal Agents")
- AB ( anti-fungal* or antifungal* or antimycotic* or anti-mycotic* or nystatin or imidazole* or miconazole or econazole or clotrimazole or sertaconazole ) OR TI ( anti-fungal* or antifungal* or antimycotic* or anti-mycotic* or nystatin or imidazole* or miconazole or econazole or clotrimazole or sertaconazole )
- (MH "Nystatin")
- (MH "Imidazoles+")
- (MH "Anti-Bacterial Agents+")
- AB ( antibiotic* or antibacterial* or antimicrobial* or flucloxacillin or erythromycin or clarithromycin or penicillin* ) OR AB ( antibiotic* or antibacterial* or antimicrobial* or flucloxacillin or erythromycin or clarithromycin or penicillin* )
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Atherton, D.J. (2016) Understanding irritant napkin dermatitis. International Journal of Dermatology 55(Suppl 1), 7-9. [Abstract]
- Blume-Peytavi, U. and Kanti, V. (2018) Prevention and treatment of diaper dermatitis. Pediatric Dermatology 35(Suppl 1), S19-S23.
- BMJ Best Practice (2023) Nappy Rash. BMJ Publishing Group. http://bestpractice.bmj.com
- BNFC (2023) British National Formulary for Children. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
- BNFC (2024) British National Formulary for Children. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
- Burdall, O., Willgress, L. and Goad, N. (2019) Neonatal skin care: Developments in care to maintain neonatal barrier function and prevention of diaper dermatitis. Pediatric Dermatology 36(1), 31-35. [Abstract]
- Carr, A.N., DeWitt, T., Cork, M.J., et al. (2020) Diaper dermatitis prevalence and severity: Global perspective on the impact of caregiver behavior. Pediatric Dermatology 37(1), 130-136. [Free Full-text]
- Cohen, B. (2017) Differential diagnosis of diaper dermatitis. Clinical Pediatrics 56(5S), 16-22. [Abstract]
- Coughlin, C.C., Eichenfield, L.F. and Frieden, I. (2014) Diaper dermatitis: clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis. Pediatric Dermatology 31(S1), 19-24. [Abstract]
- Dunk, A. M., Broom, M., Fourie, A. and Beeckman, D. (2022) Clinical signs and symptoms of diaper dermatitis in newborns, infants, and young children: A scoping review. Journal of Tissue Viability 31(3), 404-415. [Abstract]
- EMC (2020) SPC for Daktarin 2% Cream. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2021) SPC for Pevaryl 1% Topical Cream. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2022a) SPC for Clotrimazole Cream 1%. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2022b) SPC for Clarithromycin 250mg/5ml Oral Suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023a) SPC for Flucloxacillin 500 mg capsules, hard. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2023b) SPC for Clarithromycin 250mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2024) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg/5 ml granules for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
- Hebert, A.A. (2021) A new therapeutic horizon in diaper dermatitis: Novel agents with novel action. International Journal of Women's Dermatology 7(4), 466-470. [Free Full-text]
- Lund, C. (1999) Prevention and management of infant skin breakdown. Nursing Clinics of North America 34(4), 907-920. [Abstract]
- Mactaggart, E., Orchard, D. and Mui Tam, M. (2021) Baby wipes and nappy rash - what is the relationship? A review. The Australasian Journal of Dermatology 62(4), 470-477. [Abstract]
- Merrill, L. (2015) Prevention, treatment and parent education for diaper dermatitis. Nursing for Women's Health 19(4), 324-336. [Abstract]
- MHRA (2014) Statins: interactions, and updated advice for atorvastatin. Drug Safety Update 1(6), 2. [Free Full-text]
- Ness, M.J., Davis, D.M.R. and and Carey, W.A. (2013) Neonatal skin care: a concise review. International Journal of Dermatology 52(1), 14-22. [Abstract]
- Preston, C.L (2024) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
- Ravanfar, P., Wallace, J.S. and Pace, N.C. (2012) Diaper dermatitis: a review and update. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 24(4), 472-479. [Abstract]
- Reick, S., Burckhardt, M., Palm, R., et al. (2023) Measurement instruments to evaluate diaper dermatitis in children: Systematic review of measurement properties. Nursing Open 10(9), 5813-5826. [Free Full-text]
- Stamatas, G.N. and Tierney, N.K. (2014) Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management. Pediatric Dermatology 31(1), 1-7. [Abstract]
- Van Gysel, D. (2016) Infections and skin diseases mimicking diaper dermatitis. International Journal of Dermatology 55(S1), 10-13. [Abstract]