This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Injuries

Bites - human and animal

Last revised in August 2024

Human bites are either:Occlusal injuries (inflicted by actual biting), or clenched-fist injuries - sustained when a clenched fist hits a person's teeth

Bites - human and animal: Summary

  • A bite is an injury inflicted by the teeth of a human or animal. Bite wounds can take a number of forms, including abrasions, lacerations, puncture wounds, and crush or degloving injuries.
  • Human bites are either:
    • Occlusal injuries (inflicted by actual biting), or
    • Clenched-fist injuries (sustained when a clenched fist hits a person's teeth, often during a fight, causing small wounds over the metacarpophalangeal joints). 
  • Dog bites characteristically involve puncture wounds from the canine teeth which anchor the victim whilst the other teeth bite, shear, and tear the tissues causing structural damage.
  • Cats have fine, sharp teeth and, despite having a weaker bite than dogs, inflict deep puncture wounds inoculated with saliva, and are capable of penetrating bone, joints, and tendons.
  • Dog bites are the most common mammalian bite.
  • Bacterial infection is a risk if there is a break in the skin. Infective complications resulting from a bite wound include cellulitis, abscesses, tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and systemic spread (for example sepsis, meningitis, endocarditis, and organ abscesses).  
  • Tetanus can occur after an animal bite or human bite, especially in puncture wounds or those containing devitalized tissue, dirt, or foreign bodies. However, tetanus after a human bite is extremely rare.
  • Rabies is very rare in the UK as there is no indigenous rabies in terrestrial animals (although bats are a risk). It usually occurs after a person is bitten or scratched by an animal with rabies. In some parts of the world, particularly in Africa and Asia, the risk of rabies is a significant concern following a dog bite.
  • The circumstances under which the bite occurred should be documented and the wound examined. The risk of tetanus and blood-borne virus infection (for human bite wounds) or rabies (for animal bite wounds) should also be assessed.
  • Managing a bite involves:
    • Removal of any foreign bodies, for example, teeth from the wound.
    • Encouraging a wound that has just occurred to bleed, unless it is already bleeding freely.
    • Thorough irrigation with warm, running water or normal saline.
    • Considering the need for debridement.
    • Advising appropriate analgesia (ibuprofen or paracetamol) for pain relief, if required.
    • Referring to Accident and Emergency for further assessment and management if debridement or wound closure is thought to be necessary.
    • For a human bite, prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for 3 days if the skin is broken and drawn blood, involves high-risk areas of skin, or the person is at risk of wound infections. 
    • For an animal bite, prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for 3 days if a cat bite has broken the skin and has drawn blood or if the wound could be deep.
    • For a dog or other traditional pet bite, prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for 3 days if the bite has broken the skin and drawn blood and penetrated vital tissues, caused significant tissue damage, is contaminated, involves high-risk areas of skin, or the person is at risk of wound infections. 
    • Prescribing antibiotic treatment for 5 days if the bite wound is clinically infected (first-line antibiotic is co-amoxiclav, second-line antibiotic is dependent on age.)
    • Seeking immediate advice from a consultant in infectious diseases for anyone considered to be at risk of HIV or hepatitis B.
    • Considering the need for tetanus and rabies prophylaxis.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 1 month onwards.

This CKS topic covers the management of human and animal (cat and dog) bites. This CKS topic does not cover pre-exposure prophylaxis for rabies.

There are separate CKS topics on Cellulitis - acute, Child maltreatment - recognition and management, Insect bites and stings, and Lacerations.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

August 2024 — minor update. An adverse effect of co-amoxiclav has been added as per the manufacturer's SPC.

Previous changes

March 2024 — minor update. Fixed eruption added as an adverse effect of doxycycline as per the manufacturer's SPC.

August 2023 — minor update. Content in Wound Management sections restructured. No changes were made to recommendations. 

August 2023 — minor update. Typographical error corrected in the management of animal bites.

July 2023 — minor update. The manufacturer's SPC for metronidazole has been updated to note that QT prolongation has been reported (unknown frequency), particularly when metronidazole was administered with drugs with the potential for prolonging the QT interval.

May 2023 — minor update. Added potential adverse effects of co-amoxiclav to include Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can result in myocardial infarction), aseptic meningitis, linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA), and drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (all of unknown frequency). These adverse effects were noted in an update to the manufacturer’s summary of product characteristics.

March 2023 — minor update. A minor formatting change has been made to the section on wound care.

January 2023 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2023 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. Recommendations for assessment and management are largely based on the 2020 NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing and the Public Health Wales guideline Health Protection Team Guidance for the Management of Human Bite Injuries in Wales (2019). As the topic had been updated to incorporate the 2020 NICE guidance since the last major review, no significant changes to recommendations have been made.

August 2021 — minor update. Adverse effects of co-trimoxazole updated in line with revised manufacturer's SPC relating to the rare problem of severe respiratory toxicity with the potential to progress to Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

October 2020 — minor update. New advice from NICE Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing guidance has been incorporated. These changes relate primarily to the advice on when to prescribe antibiotics for human and animal bites, the number of days advised for antibiotic prescriptions for treatment and for prophylaxis, and the indications for secondary care referral for people suffering bites. The choice of antibiotics has also been revised, clarithromycin has been removed and co-trimoxazole has been added as an alternative first-choice oral antibiotic for children under 12 years for penicillin allergy or if co-amoxiclav is unsuitable. This is an off-label use of co-trimoxazole. 

October 2018 — minor update. Adverse effects updated within prescribing information - metronidazole. 

February 2018 — minor update. New guidance from Public Health England regarding Rabies: administration of vaccine and immunoglobulin added to new evidence section.

February 2018 — revised. A literature search was conducted in December 2018 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. The topic now covers dog and cat bites and the scenario on pre-exposure rabies risk has been removed. There have been structural changes to streamline the scenarios. Antibiotic choices for prophylaxis and treatment of infected bite wounds have been simplified and antibiotic doses added to prescribing information. There have been changes to the recommendations on closing bite wounds in primary care.

March 2017 — minor update. New Public Health England guidelines on post-exposure treatment incorporated into the managing rabies section. 

July 2015 — minor update. The information on the concurrent use of clarithromycin or erythromycin with statins has been clarified.

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

January 2012 — revised. A literature search was conducted in October 2011 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made. 

July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing. 

June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. 

March 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics — no changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

August 2009 — minor update. Advice from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on when to suspect child maltreatment has been added to this topic. 

February 2009 — minor update. Clarithromycin added as an antibiotic option if a person is allergic to penicillin, in line with advice from the Health Protection Agency. Link updated to Health Protection Agency Clinical Rabies Service document. 

May 2008 — minor update to the text for animal bites, making it clearer that all cat bites require antibiotic prophylaxis. 

December 2007 — minor update to the text for animal bites. CKS now recommends that specialist advice should be sought for children under 12 years old who require antibiotic treatment and are allergic to penicillin, because they are unable to receive a tetracycline. 

August 2007 — minor update to text to clarify that, if tetanus vaccination is required, a combined tetanus vaccination should be used. Minor rewording of the Clinical Summaries on Assessing a bite, Managing a human bite, and Managing a cat and dog bite. 

April to July 2007 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

March 2004 — reviewed. Validated in May 2004 and issued in July 2004.

May 2001— reviewed. Validated in July 2001 and issued in October 2001.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 January 2023.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 January 2023.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 January 2023.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analyses published since 1 January 2023.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 January 2023.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 January 2023.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 January 2023.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 January 2023.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Offer immediate first aid.
  • Reduce the risk of infection with appropriate prophylaxis. 
  • Treat any established infection.
  • Achieve satisfactory wound healing with good cosmetic outcome.
  • Prevent tetanus and rabies where appropriate.
  • Appropriately manage a person's risk of contracting hepatitis or HIV.
  • Refer for specialist assessment or treatment when necessary.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is it?

What are the characteristics of human, dog, and cat bites?

  • Human bites are either [Chhabra, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022a]: 
    • Occlusal injuries — inflicted by actual biting, or
    • Clenched-fist injuries ('fight bites') — sustained when a clenched fist hits a person's teeth, often during a fight, causing small-looking wounds over the dorsum of the hand or metacarpophalangeal joints, which may have damaged underlying structures [Kennedy, 2015]. 
  • Most human bites occur on the hand, most often from a fist fight [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]:
  • Human bites may be purposeful or incidental, and occur in a number of situations. 
    • Deliberate human bites can occur during fights, child abuse, and sexual crimes. Young children may bite to express stress, aggression, or frustration [Chhabra, 2015; Rothe, 2015].  
    • Accidental bites are associated with sports, school activities, consensual sexual activity, and occupational injury (dental health professionals) [Aziz, 2015; Chhabra, 2015; Rothe, 2015]. 
    • Bites can also be self-inflicted and are sometimes found in people with emotional disturbance or rare genetic conditions such as Lesch-Nyhan syndrome [Aziz, 2015]. 
  • Dog bites characteristically involve puncture wounds from the canine teeth, which anchor the victim whilst the other teeth bite, shear, and tear the tissues, causing structural damage [Morgan, 2007]:
    • Adult dogs have very powerful jaws. These can inflict high pressures, which, in addition to the shearing forces delivered during a bite, can cause deep, open cuts, crush wounds, devascularization, bone damage, and soft-tissue avulsion. In some cases, a body part may be torn off by a dog bite [Aziz, 2015; Kennedy, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022b]. 
    • The severity of a dog bite depends on the type and size of dog, with breeds such as Rottweilers, German Shepherds, and pit bull terriers being able to cause significant damage [Aziz, 2015; Chhabra, 2015; Kennedy, 2015]. Bites from these breeds may be more ragged and avulsive in nature and are more likely to need reconstructive surgery [Murphy, 2021].
  • Cats have fine, sharp teeth and, despite having a weaker bite than dogs, inflict narrow deep puncture wounds inoculated with saliva, and are capable of penetrating bone, joints, and tendons [Evgeniou, 2013; Chhabra, 2015; Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015].  
    • Fluids can only drain from the small skin puncture wounds, therefore infections such as abscesses and osteomyelitis are more common with cat bites [Aziz, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022b].

How common are bites?

  • The true incidence of bites is probably underestimated because some people do not report them or seek medical care [Kennedy, 2015; Edens, 2016].  Most studies are based on hospital attendance and do not include bites that need no treatment or treatment in primary care alone [Westgarth, 2018].
    • Around 50% of people will be bitten by an animal during their lifetime, with domestic animals being responsible for more than 90% of these injuries [Kennedy, 2015].
    • The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that there are tens of millions of injuries from bites each year globally [WHO, 2018].
    • In the USA, animal bites account for 1% of visits to the emergency department [Hurt, 2018].
  • Dog bites are the most common mammalian bites treated in emergency departments [Edens, 2016; WHO, 2018; Hurt, 2018].
    • A 2018 UK survey in one community found that 25% of people had been bitten by a dog in their lifetime [Westgarth, 2018]. Only a third of those had required medical treatment and fewer than 1% required hospital admission.
    • A study of hospital admissions to English hospitals for dog bites between 1998 and 2018 found admissions rose from 6.34 per 100,000 population to 14.99 per 100,000 over that time [Tulloch, 2021]. There was a large geographic variation, and the increase was driven by an increase in incidence in adults. The study estimated there was an average of 207,103 A&E attendances per year for dog bites.
    • Children are more often bitten by dogs than adults [WHO, 2018], (with the peak age range being 5-9 years) and boys and men are more frequently affected [Kennedy, 2015; Tulloch, 2021]. Older children experience more bites to the arms and legs, whereas younger children have an increased likelihood of being bitten on the head, face, or neck because of their short stature and relatively large heads relative to their bodies [Murphy, 2021; Maniscalco, 2022b].  
    • Around half of all dog bites are reported as provoked [Ellis, 2014], and 90% were inflicted on the owner of the dog or someone known to it [Rothe, 2015]. Children may be less likely to recognize signals from animals and are less aware of the danger, and therefore more likely to provoke them [Murphy, 2021].
  • Cat bites are the second most common animal bite [Maniscalco, 2022b; BMJ Best Practice, 2023], accounting for 5–15% of animal bite wounds [Ellis, 2014; Kennedy, 2015; Edens, 2016].  
  • Human bites are less common than those caused by domestic animals [Kennedy, 2015]. 
    • Human bites are most commonly inflicted on fingers and hands and may occur in a variety of settings, including those where there may be challenging behaviour (care settings, prisons, and police work) [Public Health Wales, 2019].  
    • Clenched fist bite injuries are more common in males, and occlusive bites (on breasts, genitals, or limbs) are more common in women [Kennedy, 2015]. Bites in children are most often occlusion bites to the face and upper body resulting from rough playing [Maniscalco, 2022a].
    • Bites from fights are most common in teenage and young adult males [Maniscalco, 2022a].

What are the complications of bites?

  • Bacterial infection
    • Bacterial infection is a risk if there is a break in the skin [Public Health Wales, 2019]. Skin and soft tissue infection is the most common complication following a bite injury [Greene, 2021]. Infective complications resulting from a bite wound include cellulitis, abscesses, tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, necrotizing fasciitis [Evgeniou, 2013; Chhabra, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022a], and systemic spread (for example sepsis, meningitis, endocarditis, and organ abscesses) [Chhabra, 2015; Rothe, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. The longer an infected bite wound is untreated, the more likely severe local and systemic complications are to occur [Public Health Wales, 2019].  
      • Human bites are most commonly infected by Streptococcus spp, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus spp, Eikenella corrodens, Bacteroides spp, and other anaerobes [Public Health Wales, 2019].  
      • Most animal bite wound infections are polymicrobial and contain a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic organisms [Evgeniou, 2013; Kennedy, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. Pasteurella multocida is commonly isolated from cat bites and can cause severe, fast-spreading infections in humans [Lloret, 2013; Ellis, 2014]. S. aureus, Pasteurella canis, and P. multocida are among the species affecting dog bites [Evgeniou, 2013; Chhabra, 2015]. Capnocytophaga canimorsus infection is rare after a dog bite but can have severe effects (particularly in elderly or immunocompromised people) such as sepsis, meningitis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and endocarditis [Kennedy, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022b].
    • The infection risk is related to the type of bite wound, its site, the person's individual risk factors, and the species causing the bite [Rothe, 2015].  
      • The risk of infection is high in deep or contaminated wounds; injuries with significant tissue destruction; in areas of poor perfusion; bites affecting the hands, feet, face, and genitals; and where there is bone, joint, or tendon involvement [Rothe, 2015; Edens, 2016; NICE, 2020].
      • Human bites are known to be at risk of infection and subsequent complications [Chhabra, 2015], with an infection rate of 10 to 50% [Rothe, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. Clenched fist injuries or 'fight bites' are particularly prone to infection [Kennedy, 2015; Edens, 2016].  
      • Cat bites are around twice as likely as dog bites to become infected [Kennedy, 2015] (infection rate of 30–50% for cats, 5–25% for dogs [Rothe, 2015]) because of the deep inoculation of bacteria into the puncture wounds caused by their small, sharp teeth [Evgeniou, 2013]. 
    • Tetanus is a disease caused by infection with Clostridium tetani which releases tetanus toxin. The condition is characterized by generalized rigidity and muscle spasms that can be fatal [UKHSA, 2022a]. Tetanus can occur after an animal bite or human bite [Chhabra, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2023], especially in puncture wounds or those containing devitalized tissue, dirt, or foreign bodies [UKHSA, 2022a]. However, tetanus after a human bite is extremely rare [Public Health Wales, 2019]. 
    • Cat-scratch disease is caused by Bartonella henselae and may follow a bite or scratch from a cat or dog. Cat-scratch disease presents with a mild infection at the wound site 3–14 days after the injury, followed by lymphadenopathy and symptoms including fever, malaise, headache, and poor appetite. Lymph glands near the scratch become swollen, and swelling may persist for several months. Occasionally the eyes, brain, heart, and other organs can be affected [CDC, 2020]. 
    • Syphilis transmission via a human bite has also been reported [Aziz, 2015; Chhabra, 2015].  
  • Viral infections 
    • There is a possibility of viral transmission through human bite wounds (for example hepatitis, HIV, and herpes simplex virus), although the risk is low and depends on the nature of the bite, the status of the biter and the injured person, and the presence of blood in the biter's saliva [Public Health Wales, 2019; Cresswell, 2022].  The estimated risk of HIV transmission from a human bite from a known HIV positive person not on anti-retroviral therapy is thought to be less than 1 in 10,000 [Cresswell, 2022].  
    • Rabies is an acute viral encephalomyelitis that is almost always fatal. It usually occurs after a person is bitten or scratched by an animal with rabies (most commonly a dog) [PHE, 2018]. The risk of contracting rabies in the UK is extremely low, as there is no indigenous rabies in terrestrial animals, but bats anywhere in the world can carry rabies-like viruses, therefore are considered to be a rabies risk [UKHSA, 2023a]. Rarely, cases of rabies occur in the UK in people who have been bitten in a country where rabies circulates (three cases between 2009 and 2022) [NaTHNaC, 2022].
  • Structural damage 
    • Disfiguring wounds are often a complication of severe bites or mauling [Chhabra, 2015]. 
    • Traumatic amputation of body parts (for example fingers) can result from a severe bite [Kennedy, 2015]. 
    • Tendons and joint capsule damage can occur during a clenched-fist human bite injury [Edens, 2016].  
    • Bite wounds can also cause fractures and neurovascular damage [Evgeniou, 2013]. 
      • Underlying bone fractures in children seen in hospital with dog bite injuries have been found in up to 7.7% [Cook, 2020].
      • Dog bite wounds to the heads of small children and infants can cause depressed skull fractures and traumatic brain injuries [Edens, 2016]. 
      • There are reports of fatal exsanguination from dog bites to the neck [Edens, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • Psychological effects 
    • There may be psychological distress or increased anxiety after a bite injury in both children and adults and permanent scarring and disfigurement may lead to depression and decreased self-esteem [De Keuster, 2006; Chhabra, 2015]. Bite injuries can lead to avoidance behaviours and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [Jakeman, 2020].

What is the prognosis?

  • The outcome of a bite wound is dependent on the size and severity of the wound and the person's individual risk factors [BMJ Best Practice, 2023].  
    • Minor bites generally have a good prognosis with appropriate treatment. 
    • The potential for infection, scarring, or disfigurement is greater with more severe bite wounds and correlates with a lack of proper medical attention and inadequate wound care.  
  • Death resulting from dog bites is rare in the UK. In England and Wales, there were 69 registered deaths from dog bites or strikes in the 20 years between 2001 and 2021, a mean of 3.3 deaths per year [Tulloch, 2023]. Fatality rates are higher in low- and middle-income countries, in part due to the risk of rabies [WHO, 2018].

Management

Scenario: Managing a human bite

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I assess someone with a human bite?

  • Document how and when the bite occurred.
    • Who was bitten, and by whom.
    • Whether the skin was broken or blood was involved.
    • The nature of the bite (i.e. occlusal or clenched fist).
  • Monitor vital signs if the bite is particularly traumatic, or sepsis is suspected.
  • Examine the bite using gloves, bearing in mind that deep layers of tissue may move with positional changes after the bite injury, disguising the true depth of the wound. Document the following (record both positive and negative findings as there may be future litigation):
    • The location of the wound. Photographs or diagrams may be useful.
    • The size and depth of the injury.
      • An intercanine distance of less than 3 cm suggests a child bite; more than 3 cm suggests an adult bite.
    • The type of wound (for example laceration, puncture, abrasion, crush, haematoma, avulsion, or amputation).
    • The degree of crush injury, devitalized tissue, nerve or tendon damage, and involvement of muscle, bones, joints, or blood vessels.
      • Examine wounds overlying a joint through the full range of motion to detect retracted injuries and tendon rupture.
    • Neurovascular function in the area distal to the bite — check pulses and sensation.
    • The range of movement of any adjacent joints.
    • Any lymphadenopathy.
    • The presence of any foreign bodies (for example teeth) in the wound.
    • Any signs of infection (for example redness, swelling, induration, fluctuance, necrotic tissue, purulent discharge, pain, localized cellulitis, lymphangitis, lymphadenopathy, or fever).
    • Facial bites: perform an intraoral examination to exclude cheek lacerations with an intraoral communication.
  • Determine whether the person is at increased risk of the wound becoming infected, due to:
    • The nature of the bite (deep, contaminated wounds; puncture or crush wounds; or significant tissue destruction).
    • Site of injury (for example hands, feet, face, or genitals; areas of poor perfusion or lymphatic return; or near a prosthetic joint implant). 
    • Wound penetrating bone, joints, tendons, or vascular structures.
    • Delayed presentation (more than 8 hours).
    • Associated medical conditions (for example diabetes mellitus, asplenia, immunocompromised status, chronic liver disease, or prosthetic heart valve or joint).
    • Their age (neonates, infants, and elderly people are at higher risk of infection).
  • Although rare, suspect child maltreatment if there is a report or appearance of a human bite mark that is thought unlikely to have been caused by a young child. Also consider safeguarding issues if a vulnerable adult receives a bite injury.
    • Refer for further assessment in line with local policy.
  • Assess the person's risk of tetanus and blood-borne virus infection.

Basis for recommendation

Documenting how and when the bite occurred
Monitoring vital signs
  • Expert opinion in review articles suggests monitoring vital signs in people with particularly traumatic bite injuries or where sepsis is suspected as these may be unstable. Hypotension or tachycardia could be a sign of haemorrhagic or septic shock [Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Examining the bite and documenting findings
Determining risk of infection
Safeguarding
  • The recommendation on suspecting child maltreatment is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline: Child maltreatment: when to suspect maltreatment in under 18s [NICE, 2017a]. The recommendation on vulnerable adults reflects the Public Health Wales guideline Managing human bite injuries: Guidance for health protection teams [Public Health Wales, 2019].

How should I assess the risk of tetanus and blood-borne virus infection?

  • To assess the risk of tetanus:
    • Enquire about tetanus immunization status. 
    • Determine whether the injury is considered to be a tetanus-prone wound; for example, there is:
      • A need for surgical intervention which is delayed for more than 6 hours.
      • A significant amount of devitalized tissue
      • A puncture wound (especially if in contact with soil or manure).
      • Contamination with material likely to contain tetanus spores, such as soil or manure.
      • A foreign body in the wound.
      • A compound fracture.
      • Systemic sepsis.
    • For more information see the UK Health Security Agency publications, Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') and Tetanus: guidance for health professionals. 
  • To assess the risk of acquiring a blood-borne viral infection (for example hepatitis B or C, or HIV):
    • Assess the status of the person who has been bitten (and the biter if possible):
      • Check their vaccination status for hepatitis B (and surface antibody response if applicable).
      • Ask if they are known to be HIV positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, or hepatitis C positive.
      • For more information on groups of people at increased risk of these infections, see the CKS topics on Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and HIV infection and AIDS. 
      • Note that if the bite has not broken the skin there is no risk of blood-borne virus transmission. 
    • Offer to test for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and HIV (see table 1). For more information on testing and interpretation of test results, see the CKS topics on Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and HIV infection and AIDS.  
      • If a child has received a bite, discuss their risk with a specialist (for example a consultant virologist) as it may be possible to avoid testing and the associated anxiety of venepuncture.
    • In most cases the status of the biter will not be known and it is often not practical to obtain a blood sample for testing, but if appropriate, and informed consent is given, the biter should also have their blood tested. Theoretically the biter is at higher risk given they will be exposed to the injured person's blood, whereas the person who has been bitten would usually be exposed to saliva only, unless the biter also has blood in their mouth.

Table 1. Blood tests following a bite injury

TimeHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV
At time of incident if both people are known*HBsAgAbAg/Ab combined test
6 weeks laterHBsAgPCRAg/Ab combined test
3 months laterHBsAgAb (add PCR if either person high risk of HCV)Ag/Ab combined test
6 months laterHBsAgAbAg/Ab combined test (only if the person was not tested at 3 months)

*If only one person is known, send 10 ml clotted blood for storage.

Basis for recommendation

Assessing tetanus status
  • The recommendation to enquire about tetanus immunization status is extrapolated from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publication: Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') [UKHSA, 2022a] and the Public Health Wales guideline on the Management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
  • The recommendations for determining the risk of tetanus when assessing a bite injury are based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publication: Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') [UKHSA, 2022a].
Assessing risk of blood-borne viral infection
  • This section is based on advice from the Public Health Wales publication Health Protection Team Guidance for the Management of Human Bite Injuries in Wales (2019) [Public Health Wales, 2019]. Experts acknowledge that the risk of acquiring a blood-borne viral infection (BBV) from a bite is low, but because there is still a small risk, offering testing for BBVs is recommended. The details of the assessment and testing regimen reflect those recommended in the Public Health Wales publication.

How should I manage a human bite wound?

  • For initial wound management:
    • If possible remove any foreign bodies (for example teeth) from the wound.
    • Encourage the wound to bleed (if it has just occurred), unless it is already bleeding freely.
    • Irrigate thoroughly with warm, running water or normal saline. 
    • Consider the need for debridement (for example, if the wound is dirty or there is non-viable tissue). Refer to Accident and Emergency if this is required and the skills and resources are not available in primary care.
    • Advise analgesia (paracetamol or ibuprofen) for pain relief, if required.
    • Where body tissue has been torn off as a result of a bite, wrap any torn-off parts (for example, part of an ear) in clean tissue and store in a plastic bag surrounded by ice for transport to hospital.
    • Cover the wound with an appropriate clean dressing.
  • Consider whether closure of the wound is appropriate.
    • Referral to Accident and Emergency for further assessment and management is usually indicated if wound closure is thought to be necessary. Note the types of bites for which referral is always recommended.
      • If the expertise and resources are available in primary care, seek specialist advice before attempting closure. Types of wounds that may be considered for closure include uncomplicated wounds with no risk factors for infection (for example, those presenting early which are not heavily contaminated, have been adequately irrigated and debrided, and do not involve underlying structures). 
    • Allow the following bite wounds to heal without formal closure:
      • Bite wounds over 24 hours old.
      • Infected bite wounds.
      • Deep puncture wounds.
      • Crush injuries.
      • Heavy contamination.
      • Uncertain adequacy of debridement.
      • Bites to the limbs, hands, and feet.
  • Do not offer antibiotic prophylaxis to people with a human bite that has not broken the skin.
  • Offer antibiotic prophylaxis to people with a human bite that has broken the skin and drawn blood.
  • Consider antibiotic prophylaxis for people with a human bite that has broken the skin but not drawn blood if it:
    • Involves a high-risk area such as the hands, feet, face, genitals, skin overlying cartilaginous structures, or an area of poor circulation.
    • Is in a person at risk of a serious wound infection because of a comorbidity (such as diabetes, immunosuppression, asplenia, or decompensated liver disease).
  • If antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, prescribe co-amoxiclav for 3 days first line for children aged over one month and adults. If there is a penicillin allergy, or co-amoxiclav is unsuitable: 
    • For adults and young people aged 12 to 17 years, prescribe metronidazole plus doxycycline for 3 days.
    • For children aged under 12 years, prescribe co-trimoxazole for 3 days.
    • For more information on dosing, contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see Prescribing information.
  • If the wound is infected:
    • Send pus or a deep wound swab for culture, before cleaning the wound. State on the form that the swab is from an infected human bite. 
    • Treat empirically with oral antibiotics if there are symptoms or signs of infection, including increased pain, inflammation, fever, discharge, or an unpleasant smell emanating from the wound. 
    • Admit anyone who has a severe infection or who is systemically unwell as intravenous antibiotics may be required.
  • For treatment of an infected bite, prescribe co-amoxiclav for 5 days first line for children aged over one month and adults. If there is a penicillin allergy, or co-amoxiclav is unsuitable: 
    • For adults and young people aged 12 to 17 years, prescribe metronidazole plus doxycycline for 5 days.
    • For children aged under 12 years, prescribe co-trimoxazole for 5 days.
    • For more information on dosing, contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see Prescribing information.
  • Give follow-up advice if the person has not been referred to hospital.
    • If the bite wound is not infected — advise the person to check for signs of infection and if these develop to attend urgently for review. Consider arranging a routine review within 24 to 48 hours.
    • If the wound is infected — review at 24 and 48 hours to ensure the infection is responding to treatment. Advise the person to attend urgently for review if the infection worsens or if they feel increasingly unwell.
    • For follow-up testing of people who are at risk of a blood-borne virus, see Assessment of tetanus and blood-borne virus risk.
  • Reassess the bite if:
    • Symptoms or signs of infection develop or worsen rapidly or significantly at any time, or do not start to improve within 24 to 48 hours of starting treatment.
    • The person becomes systemically unwell.
    • The person has severe pain that is out of proportion to the infection.
  • Be aware that people who have difficulty communicating may have nonverbal signs of pain, such as a change in behaviour.
  • If a skin swab has been sent for microbiological testing, review the choice of antibiotic based on the swab results. If a change of antibiotic is needed, use a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible. 

Basis for recommendation

Initial wound care
  • All recommendations on initial wound care are based on the Public Health Wales publication Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
    • There is limited evidence on bite injury decontamination, irrigation, and debridement, but it is a well-established approach [Looke, 2015; Maniscalco, 2022a].  
    • A 2022 Cochrane review found it was unclear if cleaning wounds with either tap water or saline had any impact on reducing infection, and no evidence for superiority of one over the other [Fernandez, 2022]. However, the uncertain results related to the study designs and the low certainty of evidence, and the review was not specific to bite wounds. 
    • Irrigation is nevertheless used as a means of infection prevention as it may remove foreign bodies and pathogens, but CKS does not recommend irrigation under pressure in primary care as some experts warn this can cause the spread of bacteria into deeper tissue layers [Rothe, 2015]; although, others recommend this approach [Hurt, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2023] and it may be used in secondary care settings [Evgeniou, 2013].
When to close
  • Primary wound closure in mammalian bites is controversial, therefore CKS recommends seeking specialist advice before attempting closure in primary care.
    • Evidence from two randomized controlled trials discussed in a BMJ Clinical Evidence review suggests that, with adequate debridement, infection rates are similar with primary and delayed closure in uncomplicated wounds (for example those presenting early and not involving underlying structures). Healing time and cosmetic result may be better with primary closure. However, the authors did not recommend primary closure of complicated wounds because of a higher risk of infection [Looke, 2015].  
    • Although experts acknowledge the varying opinion on the closure of bite wounds, this approach is also supported in some review articles [Rothe, 2015; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023] and the guideline from Public Health Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
  • The features of bite wounds which should be left to heal without formal closure is based on the guideline from Public Health Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019] and expert opinion in review articles on human, mammalian, and animal bite wounds [Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023],
Prophylactic antibiotics
  • The recommendation to prescribe prophylactic antibiotics for human bite wounds is based on the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].
    • Evidence from a Cochrane systematic review (search date November 2000) found a statistically significant reduction in infection with prophylactic antibiotics in hand bites (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.86) and human bites (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.33), although only one small trial on human bites was included and the antibiotic choices were diverse [Medeiros, 2001].  
Treatment of wound infection
  • Sending swabs from infected bite wounds for culture is recommended in the Public Health Wales guideline Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019] and the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020]. 
    • The results can guide antibiotic therapy as atypical organisms may be isolated [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. Giving the laboratory information on the individual case will influence the methods and incubation times used [Rothe, 2015].  
  • The recommendation to admit a person with a serious infection or systemic symptoms is pragmatic and based on expert opinion in review articles [Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Choice of antibiotic
  • The antibiotic choices reflect those in the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].
Follow up
  • Guidance on follow up advice and the need for routine review varies. The recommendations on follow up reflect advice in the Public Health Wales publication Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019]. The NICE guideline on antimicrobial prescribing suggests only advising people to seek medical help if symptoms or signs of infection develop or worsen rapidly or significantly at any time, or do not improve within 24 to 48 hours of starting treatment [NICE, 2020], and the BMJ Best Practice review suggests one routine follow up in all within 24 to 48 hours [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. CKS considers the Public Health Wales guideline a safe follow up guide, hence using that recommendation, but has additionally added considering review for all in 24 - 48 hours in keeping with the recommendation in the BMJ Best Practice review. However, pragmatically, clinical discretion could be applied depending on the characteristics of the wound and the patient.
Reassessment
  • The recommendation to reassess the wound is based on NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].

How should I manage a person's risk of tetanus and blood-borne viruses?

  • To manage a person's risk of tetanus:
  • To manage a person's risk of blood-borne viruses:
    • Seek immediate advice from a consultant in infectious diseases, a virologist, or the local Health Protection Team for anyone considered to be at risk of HIV or hepatitis B from a bite wound. Consider all people to be at risk unless the current status of the biter is known (rare).

Basis for recommendation

Tetanus
  • This recommendation is based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publications: Immunisation against infectious disease [UKHSA, 2022a].  
    • The risk of tetanus from a human bite is very low.  A reinforcing dose of the tetanus vaccine and possibly further doses may be required if a person is not fully immunized. Usually, tetanus immunoglobulin (TIG) is not required if a person is fully immunized, but the need for TIG will depend on the person's immunization status and whether the wound is high-risk [UKHSA, 2022a; Public Health Wales, 2019].
Blood-borne viruses
  • The recommendation on the management of blood-borne virus risk is extrapolated from a chapter on hepatitis B in the PHE publication Immunisation against infectious disease [UKHSA, 2022b]; a Public Health Wales document on Managing human bite injuries: guidance for health protection teams [Public Health Wales, 2019]; and a section on bites in the UK guideline for the use of post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure [Cresswell, 2016].  
    • Hepatitis B — post-exposure prophylaxis for hepatitis B may include giving one or more doses of hepatitis B vaccine with or without hepatitis B immunoglobulin depending on the level of exposure, the hepatitis B status of the biter, and the vaccination status of the person with the bite injury [UKHSA, 2022b].  
    • Hepatitis C — there is no post-exposure prophylaxis available for hepatitis C virus, but serial testing will be required after the bite incident. Only after this can the person be reassured they have not acquired hepatitis C [Public Health Wales, 2019]. 
    • HIV — post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV is not usually required after a human bite because the risk of HIV transmission is very low. It may be considered in some circumstances (after seeking specialist advice) if; for example, either person is known to be HIV positive and the bite draws blood, or is deep [Cresswell, 2016; Public Health Wales, 2019].   

When should I refer someone with a human bite?

  • Refer to secondary care (with urgency depending on clinical judgement):
    • Severe bite injuries with heavy bleeding causing haemodynamic instability.
    • Penetrating wounds involving arteries, joints, nerves, muscles, tendons, bones, or the central nervous system. Note: penetrating bites to the hands (particularly bites to a clenched fist), feet, or head are at particular risk of infection and serious complications. 
    • Facial wounds (excluding very minor wounds) and bites to the eye or orbit. 
    • Bites where there is a possibility of a foreign body (for example a tooth) in the wound. 
    • Devitalized wounds where debridement is required, or wounds that might benefit from closure. 
    • Injuries requiring reconstructive surgery.
    • People with abscesses, severe cellulitis, lymphangitis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, necrotising fasciitis or with infected bite wounds that are not responding to treatment, or who are systemically unwell with possible sepsis. 
    • People with an increased risk of infection; for example, diabetes mellitus, asplenia, immunocompromised status, chronic liver disease, or prosthetic heart valve or joint. 
    • Bites to poorly vascularized areas such as ear cartilage/nose cartilage.
    • People who cannot take oral antibiotics (in which case, explore with the specialist whether locally available options for parenteral antibiotics at home or in the community, rather than in hospital, are appropriate).
    • People who have developed signs or symptoms of significant infection whilst taking antibiotics or are on prophylactic antibiotics.
  • If bite wounds suggest possible child protection issues or safeguarding issues for a vulnerable adult, refer for further assessment in line with local policy.
  • If the person is at risk of tetanus and assessment suggests they may require tetanus immunoglobulin, seek specialist advice. 
  • If there is a possibility that the person has been exposed to a blood-borne virus such as hepatitis B or HIV, seek immediate advice from a consultant in infectious diseases, a virologist, or the local Health Protection Team. For more information see Managing risk of tetanus and blood-borne viruses.  

Basis for recommendation

Referral of the bite injury
  • The criteria for referring a bite wound to secondary care are based on the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020] and the Public Health Wales guideline Health Protection Team Guidance for the Management of Human Bite Injuries in Wales (2019) [Public Health Wales, 2019], supported by expert opinion in review articles on human and mammalian bites [Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. 
    • Referral may be needed for further investigation of the bite wound (for example X-rays to evaluate the damage to joints and bone, or assess for the presence of foreign bodies; ultrasound/angiography to assess for vascular injury; and exploration under local anaesthesia) [Rasmussen, 2017; Hurt, 2018; Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
    • Specialist surgical debridement and repair may be required for some bite wounds. General anaesthesia is sometimes indicated, depending on the extent of the wound and duration the of the procedure [Rothe, 2015]. 
    • Bites to the hand, particularly the clenched fist injuries are at higher risk of infection due to the anatomy of the hand and the minimal soft tissue protection between skin and joint [Kennedy, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017].
    • Facial bites ideally should be sutured, if possible, for better cosmetic results, by an appropriate specialist [Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
    • Admission to hospital for intravenous antibiotics should be considered for people with severe local infection or systemic infection or those with hand bites, severe underlying illness, or immunocompromise. Parenteral therapy may also be required if there is bone or joint involvement [Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; NICE, 2020; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • CKS found no evidence on the urgency of referral but recommends using clinical judgement when deciding how quickly to refer to secondary care based on what it considers to be good clinical practice. In some cases, an ambulance may be indicated; for example, where there is significant vascular or neurological involvement and immediate hospital attendance will be required [Edens, 2016]. The NICE guideline suggests that in some cases, specialist advice could be sought, suggesting in some cases (such as those who cannot take oral antibiotics or those at risk due to pre-existing medical conditions) expert advice by telephone may be sufficient [NICE, 2020].
Referral for safeguarding issues
  • The recommendation on referral in line with local policies when child or vulnerable adult maltreatment is suspected is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline: Child abuse and neglect [NICE, 2017b] and the Public Health Wales guideline Health Protection Team Guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
Referral for assessment and management of tetanus or blood-borne virus risk
  • CKS recommends seeking specialist advice for people who are at risk of tetanus and may require tetanus immunoglobulin on the basis of what it considers to be good clinical practice as tetanus immunoglobulin is not readily available in primary care [PHE, 2019; UKHSA, 2022a]. 
  • Referral for people at risk of a blood-borne virus is recommended because hepatitis B immunoglobulin or post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV may be required [Public Health Wales, 2019; UKHSA, 2022b], which are not readily available in a primary care setting.

Scenario: Managing a cat or dog bite

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I assess someone with a dog or cat bite?

  • Document how and when the bite occurred.
    • The type of animal (domesticated or wild) and its state of health or any unusual symptoms.
    • Whether the attack was provoked.
    • Mechanism of injury.
  • Monitor vital signs if the bite is particularly traumatic, or sepsis is suspected.
  • Examine the bite using gloves, bearing in mind that deep layers of tissue may move with positional changes after the bite injury, disguising the true depth of the wound. Document the following (record both positive and negative findings as there may be future litigation):
    • The location of the wound. Photographs or diagrams may be useful.
    • The size, extent, and depth of the injury.
    • The type of wound (for example laceration, puncture, abrasion, crush, haematoma, avulsion, or amputation).
    • The degree of crush injury, devitalized tissue, nerve or tendon damage, and involvement of muscle, bones, joints, or blood vessels.
      • Examine wounds overlying a joint through the full range of motion to detect retracted injuries and tendon rupture.
    • Neurovascular function in the area distal to the bite — check pulses and sensation.
    • The range and movement of any adjacent joints.
    • Any lymphadenopathy.
    • The presence of any foreign bodies (for example teeth) in the wound.
    • Any signs of infection (for example redness, swelling, induration, necrotic tissue, purulent discharge, pain, localized cellulitis, lymphangitis, lymphadenopathy, or fever).
    • Facial bites: perform an intraoral examination to exclude cheek lacerations with an intraoral communication. 
  • Determine whether the person is at increased risk of the wound becoming infected, due to:
    • The type of animal — cat bites increase the risk of infection.
    • The nature of the bite (deep, contaminated wounds; puncture or crush wounds; or significant tissue destruction).
    • Site of injury (for example extremities such as hands, feet, face, or genitals; areas of poor perfusion or lymphatic return; or near a prosthetic joint implant).  
    • Wound penetrating bone, joints, tendons, or vascular structures.
    • Delayed presentation (more than 8 hours).
    • Associated medical conditions (for example diabetes mellitus, asplenia, immunocompromised status, chronic liver disease, or a prosthetic heart valve or joint).
    • Their age (neonates, infants, and elderly people are at higher risk of infection).
  • Although rare, consider the possibility of child neglect if there is a report or appearance of an animal bite on a child who has been inadequately supervised. Refer for further assessment in line with local policy.
  • Assess the person's risk of tetanus and rabies infection.

Basis for recommendation

Documenting how and when the bite occurred
Monitoring vital signs
  • Expert opinion in review articles suggests monitoring vital signs in people with particularly traumatic bite injuries or where sepsis is suspected as these may be unstable. Hypotension or tachycardia could be a sign of haemorrhagic or septic shock [Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Examining the bite and documenting findings
Determining risk of infection
Safeguarding
  • The recommendation on suspecting child maltreatment is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline: Child maltreatment: when to suspect maltreatment in under 18s [NICE, 2017a].

How should I assess the risk of tetanus and rabies?

  • To assess the risk of tetanus:
    • Enquire about tetanus immunization status.
    • Determine whether the injury is considered to be a tetanus-prone wound; for example, there is:
      • A delay in surgical intervention for more than 6 hours.
      • Contamination with material likely to contain C. tetani spores, such as soil or manure.
      • A significant amount of devitalised tissue.
      • A puncture wound (especially if in contact with soil or manure).
      • A foreign body in the wound.
      • A compound fracture.
      • Systemic sepsis.
    • For more information see the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publications, Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') and Tetanus: guidance for health professionals.
  • To assess the risk of rabies, enquire about the:
    • Country in which the person was bitten and the origin of the animal. 
      • The UK is considered to be a 'no risk' country, with no indigenous rabies in terrestrial animals. However, note that exposure to bats and their secretions is considered a potential rabies risk anywhere in the world. Certain groups of people in the UK are considered to be at increased risk of rabies (for example laboratory workers working with the rabies virus or people handling bats or imported animals). 
      • If the person was bitten abroad, the UK Health Security Agency's guidance on Rabies risks by country (for terrestrial animals) categorizes countries as no risk, low risk, or high risk. 
    • Site and severity of the wound — bites with broken skin, contamination of mucous membranes or skin lesions with an animal's saliva or body fluid, and proximal (head and neck) bites are considered to be high-risk.
    • Circumstances of the bite — unprovoked bites are considered higher risk.
    • Species of animal and its health status and behaviour in the days and weeks after the biting incident — abnormal behaviour increases the risk of infection.
    • Immune status of the person bitten based on history of rabies vaccination.
  • A risk assessment should be performed on anyone who is at risk of rabies exposure using the UKHSA Rabies post exposure risk assessment form and calendar. In England, the risk assessment should be encrypted and emailed securely to the Rabies and Immunoglobulin Service. In addition to the above, the further information will be needed to complete the risk assessment: name, date of birth, age, address, NHS number, date of exposure, history of immunosuppression, and allergies.
  • For more information on rabies risk assessment, see the UKHSA Collection on Rabies: risk assessment, post-exposure treatment, management (available at www.gov.uk) or seek specialist advice from:
    • England — Local health protection team or the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Rabies and Immunoglobulin Service (tel. 0330 128 1020 Monday to Friday 8.30 am to 5pm), or out of hours UKHSA Colindale (tel. 020 8200 4400). 
    • Wales —  Public Health Wales health protection team (tel. 0300 003 0032) or duty virologist, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff (029 20 747 747). 
    • Scotland — Local infectious diseases consultant on-call (contact details listed in chapter 27 on rabies in the green book).
    • Northern Ireland — The regional virology service (028 9024 0503) or the Public Health Agency Duty Room (030 0555 0119).

Basis for recommendation

Assessing tetanus status
  • The recommendation to assess a person's tetanus status when they have received a bite injury is based on the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publication: Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') [UKHSA, 2022a] and expert opinion in a review articles [Edens, 2016; Maniscalco, 2022b; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Assessing risk of rabies
  • The recommendations on assessing a person's risk of rabies following a bite injury are based on the UKHSA publications Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') [PHE, 2018], Managing rabies post-exposure (January 2023) [UKHSA, 2023b], and Rabies risks in terrestrial animals by country [UKHSA, 2023a].

How should I manage a cat or dog bite wound?

  • For initial wound management:
    • If possible remove any foreign bodies (for example, teeth) from the wound.
    • Encourage the wound to bleed (if it has just occurred), unless it is already bleeding freely.
    • Irrigate thoroughly with warm, running water or normal saline. It is usually not possible to irrigate small puncture wounds.
    • Consider the need for debridement (for example, if the wound is dirty or there is non-viable tissue) and refer to Accident and Emergency if this is required and the skills and resources are not available in primary care.
    • Advise analgesia (paracetamol or ibuprofen) for pain relief, if required.
    • Where body tissue has been torn off as a result of a bite, wrap any torn-off parts (for example, part of an ear) in clean tissue and store in a plastic bag surrounded by ice for transport to hospital.
    • Cover the wound with an appropriate clean dressing. 
  • Consider whether closure of the wound is appropriate:
    • Referral to Accident and Emergency for further assessment and management is usually indicated if wound closure is thought to be necessary. Note the types of bites for which specialist referral is always recommended.
      • If the expertise and resources are available in primary care, seek specialist advice before attempting closure. Types of wounds that may be considered for closure include uncomplicated wounds with no risk factors for infection (for example, those presenting early which are not heavily contaminated, have been adequately irrigated and debrided, and do not involve underlying structures).
    • Allow the following bite wounds to heal without formal closure:
      • Bite wounds over 24 hours old.
      • Infected bite wounds.
      • Deep puncture wounds (for example, cat bites).
      • Crush injuries.
      • Heavy contamination.
      • Uncertain adequacy of debridement.
      • Bites to the limbs, hands, and feet.
  • For people with cat bites:
    • Do not offer antibiotic prophylaxis to people with a cat bite that has not broken the skin. 
    • Offer antibiotic prophylaxis if the cat bite has broken the skin and drawn blood. 
    • Consider antibiotic prophylaxis for people with a cat bite that has broken the skin but not drawn blood if the wound could be deep. 
  • For people with bites from a dog or other traditional pet (excluding cats):
    • Do not offer antibiotic prophylaxis for a bite that: 
      • Has not broken the skin.
      • Has broken the skin, but has not drawn blood.
    • Offer antibiotic prophylaxis if the bite has broken the skin and drawn blood if it: 
      • Has penetrated bone, joint, tendon, or vascular structures.
      • Is deep, is a puncture or crush wound, or has caused significant tissue damage.
      • Is visibly contaminated (for example, if there is dirt or a tooth in the wound).
    • Consider antibiotic prophylaxis if the bite has broken the skin and drawn blood if it:  
      • Involves a high-risk area such as the hands, feet, face, genitals, skin overlying cartilaginous structures or near prosthetic joints, or an area of poor circulation. 
      • Is in a person at risk of serious wound infection or systemic infection because of comorbidity (for example, diabetes mellitus, asplenia, immunosuppression, decompensated liver disease), or they have a prosthetic heart valve, or if they are at the extremes of age. 
  • If antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, prescribe co-amoxiclav for 3 days first line for children aged over one month and adults. If there is a penicillin allergy, or co-amoxiclav is unsuitable: 
    • For adults and young people aged 12 to 17 years, prescribe metronidazole plus doxycycline for 3 days.
    • For children aged under 12 years, prescribe co-trimoxazole for 3 days.
    • For more information on dosing, contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see Prescribing information.
    • Seek specialist advice for the most appropriate antibiotic for bites from other animals (for example, pigs). 
  • If the wound is infected:
    • Send a pus or deep wound swab for culture, before cleaning the wound. State on the form that the swab is from an infected animal bite.
    • Treat empirically with oral antibiotics if there are symptoms or signs of infection, including increased pain, inflammation, fever, discharge, or an unpleasant smell emanating from the wound.
    • Admit anyone who has a severe infection or who is systemically unwell as intravenous antibiotics may be required.
  • For treatment of an infected bite, prescribe co-amoxiclav for 5 days first line for children aged over one month and adults. If there is a penicillin allergy, or co-amoxiclav is unsuitable: 
    • For adults and young people aged 12 to 17 years, prescribe metronidazole plus doxycycline for 5 days.
    • For children aged under 12 years, prescribe co-trimoxazole for 5 days.
    • For more information on dosing, contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see Prescribing information.
  • Give follow-up advice if the person has not been referred to hospital.
    • If the bite wound is not infected — advise the person to check for signs of infection and if these develop to attend urgently for review. Consider arranging a routine review within 24 to 48 hours.
    • If the wound is infected — review at 24 and 48 hours to ensure the infection is responding to treatment. Advise the person to attend urgently for review if the infection worsens or if they feel increasingly unwell.
    • Follow-up for people who require post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies should be as advised by a specialist. For more information, see Managing risk of tetanus and rabies.
  • Reassess the animal bite if:
    • Symptoms or signs of infection develop or worsen rapidly or significantly at any time, or do not start to improve within 24 to 48 hours of starting treatment.
    • The person becomes systemically unwell.
    • The person has severe pain that is out of proportion to the infection.
  • Be aware that people who have difficulty communicating may have non-verbal signs of pain, such as a change in behaviour.
  • If a skin swab has been sent for microbiological testing, review the choice of antibiotic based on the swab results. If a change of antibiotic is needed, use a narrow-spectrum antibiotic if possible. 

Basis for recommendation

Initial wound care
  • There is limited evidence on bite injury decontamination, irrigation, and debridement, but it is a well-established approach [Looke, 2015]. Recommendations on initial wound care are based on expert opinion in review articles [Evgeniou, 2013; Aziz, 2015; Chhabra, 2015; Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • A 2022 Cochrane review found it was unclear if cleaning wounds with either tap water or saline had any impact on reducing infection, and no evidence for superiority of one over the other [Fernandez, 2022]. However, the uncertain results related to the study designs and the low certainty of evidence, and the review was not specific to bite wounds. 
  • Irrigation is nevertheless used as a means of infection prevention as it may remove foreign bodies and pathogens, but CKS does not recommend irrigation under pressure in primary care because some experts warn this can cause the spread of bacteria into deeper tissue layers [Rothe, 2015]; although, others recommend this approach [Hurt, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2023] and it may be used in secondary care settings [Evgeniou, 2013].
  • CKS found no evidence on analgesia for bite wounds but has based this recommendation on what it considers to be good clinical practice and extrapolation from the Public Health Wales publication Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
  • The information on action if body tissue has been detached by the bite has been extrapolated from the Public Health Wales publication Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019].
When to close
  • Primary wound closure in mammalian bites is controversial, therefore CKS recommends seeking specialist advice before attempting closure in primary care.
    • A Cochrane review in 2019 found no high-certainty evidence to support or refute recommendations concerning primary closure for dog bites [Bhaumik, 2019]. It concluded that the potential benefits or harms of primary closure compared with delayed or no closure for mammalian bites remains uncertain and that more trials are needed.
    • The Infectious Diseases Society of America's Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections do not recommend primary closure of animal bite wounds (except the face) [Stevens, 2014], but evidence from two randomized controlled trials discussed in a BMJ Clinical Evidence review suggests that, with adequate debridement, infection rates are similar with primary and delayed closure in uncomplicated wounds (for example those presenting early and not involving underlying structures). Healing time and cosmetic result may be better with primary closure. However, the authors did not recommend primary closure of complicated wounds because of a higher risk of infection [Looke, 2015]. Although experts acknowledge the varying opinion on closure of bite wounds, this approach is also supported in some review articles [Rothe, 2015; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
  • The features of bite wounds which should be left to heal without formal closure is based on expert opinion in review articles on human, mammalian, and animal bite wounds [Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Rasmussen, 2017; Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Prophylactic antibiotics
  • The recommendation on when to prescribe prophylactic antibiotics for dog or cat bite wounds is based on the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020]. Additional examples of people considered to be at higher risk of infection in whom to consider antibiotics reflects expert opinion in review articles on mammalian, human, and animal bites [Chhabra, 2015; Kennedy, 2015; Looke, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Rasmussen, 2017; Hurt, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. The final NICE guideline leaves out prosthetic heart valves and joints as examples of high risk indicators, although these were specified in the 2019 draft and previous versions of this CKS topic. However, there is no rationale for decision about use of specific examples of high risk areas or comorbidities within the evidence review. There are some reports of cases in the literature of prosthetic joint infections following animal bites in the area, albeit rarely, so CKS considered this could be viewed as an example of a high risk area where a clinician could consider the use of prophylactic antibiotics, particularly as infection could potentially lead to the need for removal of the prosthesis and lengthy courses of antibiotics [Miranda, 2013; Tande, 2014; Honnorat, 2016]. People with prosthetic valves feature in review articles as amongst those considered potentially high risk [Rothe, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]; although, there is little in the literature relating to cases of infection following bites in this population [Alifragki, 2022].
Treatment of wound infection
  • Sending swabs from infected bite wounds for culture is recommended in the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing guidance [NICE, 2020], and is supported by expert opinion in review articles [Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Rasmussen, 2017]. If there are no signs of acute infection, swabs for culture are not reliable [Kennedy, 2015].
    • The results can guide antibiotic therapy as atypical organisms may be isolated [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. Giving the laboratory information on the individual case will influence the methods and incubation times used [Rothe, 2015]. 
  • The recommendation to admit people with severe local infection or systemic signs is pragmatic and based on expert opinion in review articles [Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
Choice of antibiotic
  • The antibiotic choices reflect those in the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020].  
Follow up
  • Guidance on follow up advice and the need for routine review varies. The recommendations on follow up are extrapolated from advice in the Public Health Wales publication Health protection team guidance for the management of human bite injuries in Wales [Public Health Wales, 2019]. The NICE guideline on antimicrobial prescribing suggests only advising people to seek medical help if symptoms or signs of infection develop or worsen rapidly or significantly at any time, or do not improve within 24 to 48 hours of starting treatment [NICE, 2020], and the BMJ Best Practice review suggests one routine follow up in all within 24 to 48 hours [BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. CKS considers the Public Health Wales guideline a safe follow up guide, hence using that recommendation, but has additionally added considering review for all in 24 - 48 hours in keeping with the recommendation in the BMJ Best Practice review. However, pragmatically, clinical discretion could be applied depending on the characteristics of the wound and the patient.
Reassessment 
  • The recommendations on reassessment are based on the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020]. 

How should I manage a person's tetanus and rabies risk?

  • To manage a person's risk of tetanus:
    • Refer to updated information on the management of tetanus risk, depending on the person's immunization status and the risk status of the wound, in the chapter on tetanus in the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publication Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book'), and document Tetanus: guidance for health professionals. These guide health professionals in the management of tetanus-prone wounds and advise on the need for vaccine booster and/or human tetanus immunoglobulin, which may be required depending on age, vaccination status, and level of risk of tetanus.
  • To manage a person's risk of rabies: 
    • The need for treatment will be determined and organized by a specialist based on the person's rabies risk assessment. See the section on Assessment of tetanus and rabies risk for contact details for the appropriate specialist in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. 
    • Treatment recommendations are grouped into the following categories:
      • No risk, therefore no treatment.
      • Vaccine and human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG).
      • Vaccine only.
      • Vaccine, HRIG, and blood test with the last dose of vaccine.
      • Observation of animal (domestic cats and dogs only).
    • If treatment is required but has not been started, post-exposure treatment should be commenced as soon as possible, ideally within 24 hours of contact. Initiating post-exposure treatment is not considered a medical emergency, and rabies vaccine/human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) can usually be sent out to be given the next day in most cases. However, for high-risk exposures, such as severe and multiple bites to the head and neck bites or from a confirmed rabid animal, treatment should ideally be started within 12 hours of reporting. NHS Trusts in England should have locally available rabies vaccine so that prompt treatment can be initiated.
    • The mainstay of post-exposure treatment is the rabies vaccine given by intramuscular injection at 0, 3, 7, and 21 days. HRIG may provide short-term immunity in the first week following the initiation of treatment.
    • It is important to note that vaccination and human rabies immunoglobulin should never be given at the same anatomical site. Vaccine doses are given in alternate arms.

Basis for recommendation

Tetanus
  • This recommendation is based on the chapter on tetanus in the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publications: Immunisation against infectious disease [UKHSA, 2022a] and Tetanus: guidance for health professionals [PHE, 2019].
Rabies
  • The information on the management of rabies risk is based on UKHSA Rabies post-exposure treatment: management guidelines [UKHSA, 2023b].
    • Post-exposure treatment and immunization depend on the details of the exposure, the species of animal involved, and the person's immune status. It may include the administration of rabies vaccine with or without human rabies immunoglobulin [PHE, 2018]. 

When should I refer someone with a dog or cat bite?

  • Refer to secondary care (with urgency depending on clinical judgement):
    • Severe bite injuries with heavy bleeding causing haemodynamic instability.
    • Penetrating wounds involving arteries, joints, nerves, muscles, tendons, bones, or the central nervous system. Note: penetrating bites to the hands, feet, or head are at particular risk of infection and serious complications. 
    • Children with scalp wounds and potential penetrating wounds to the skull.
    • Facial wounds (excluding very minor wounds) and bites to the eye or orbit.
    • Serious hand bites.
    • Bites where there is a possibility of a foreign body (for example a tooth) in the wound.
    • Devitalized wounds where debridement is required or wounds that might benefit from closure.
    • Bites that might need reconstructive surgery.
    • People with abscesses, lymphangitis, severe cellulitis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, necrotising fasciitis, infected bite wounds that are not responding to treatment, or who are systemically unwell.
    • People with an increased risk of infection — for example, diabetes mellitus, asplenia, immunocompromised status, chronic liver disease, or a prosthetic heart valve or joint.
    • Bites to poorly vascularized areas such as ear cartilage/nose cartilage.
    • People who cannot take oral antibiotics (in which case, explore with the specialist whether locally available options for parenteral antibiotics at home or in the community, rather than in hospital, are appropriate)
    • People who have developed signs or symptoms of significant infection whilst taking antibiotics or are on prophylactic antibiotics.
  • If an animal has bitten a child, consider the possibility of poor parenting and supervision. Follow local policies for referral of children considered at risk.
  • If the person is at risk of tetanus and assessment suggests they may require tetanus immunoglobulin, seek specialist advice. 
  • If there is a possibility that the person has been exposed to rabies, seek immediate advice from:
    • England — Local health protection team or the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) service Rabies and Immunoglobulin Service (tel. 0330 128 1020 Monday to Friday 8.30 am to 5pm), or out of hours UKHSA Colindale (tel. 020 8200 4400). 
    • Wales —  Public Health Wales health protection team (tel. 0300 003 0032) or duty virologist, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff (029 20 747 747). 
    • Scotland — Local infectious diseases consultant on-call (contact details listed in chapter 27 on rabies in the green book).
    • Northern Ireland — The regional virology service (028 9024 0503) or the Public Health Agency Duty Room (030 0555 0119).

Basis for recommendation

Referral of the bite injury
  • The criteria for referring a bite wound to secondary care are based on the NICE guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020] and supported by expert opinion in review articles on human, mammalian, and animal bites [Chhabra, 2015; Kennedy, 2015; Rothe, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
    • Referral may be needed for further investigation of the bite wound (for example X-ray to evaluate damage to joints and bone, or assess for the presence of foreign bodies; ultrasound/angiography to assess for vascular injury; and exploration under local anaesthesia) [Rasmussen, 2017; Hurt, 2018; Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
    • Specialist surgical debridement and repair may be required for some animal bite wounds (such as those involving the eye, blood vessels, hand, face, or with abscesses or deep tissue infections) [Chhabra, 2015]. Devitalised tissue resulting from crush injuries should be debrided to reduce the risk of infection [Evgeniou, 2013]. General anaesthesia is sometimes indicated, depending on the extent of the wound and the duration of the procedure [Rothe, 2015].  
    • Bites to the hand are at higher risk of infection due to the anatomy of the hand and the minimal soft tissue protection between skin and joint [Kennedy, 2015; Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017].
    • Facial bites ideally should be sutured if possible for better cosmetic results, by an appropriate specialist [Murphy, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2023].
    • Admission to hospital for intravenous antibiotics should be considered for people with severe local infection or systemic infection or those with hand bites, severe underlying illness, or immunocompromise. Parenteral therapy may also be required if there is bone or joint involvement [Edens, 2016; Rasmussen, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2023]. 
  • CKS found no evidence on the urgency of referral but recommends using clinical judgement when deciding how quickly to refer to secondary care based on what it considers to be good clinical practice. In some cases, an ambulance may be indicated, for example where there is significant vascular or neurological involvement and immediate hospital attendance will be required [Edens, 2016]. The NICE guideline suggests that in some cases, specialist advice could be sought, suggesting in some cases (such as those who cannot take oral antibiotics or those at risk due to pre-existing medical conditions) expert advice by telephone may be sufficient [NICE, 2020].
Referral for safeguarding issues
  • The recommendation on referral in line with local policies when child maltreatment is suspected is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline: Child abuse and neglect [NICE, 2017b].
Referral for assessment and management of tetanus and rabies risk
  • CKS recommends seeking specialist advice regarding the management of people who are at risk of tetanus and may require tetanus immunoglobulin on the basis of what it considers to be good clinical practice. Tetanus immunoglobulin is not readily available in primary care [PHE, 2019; UKHSA, 2022a].  
  • Rabies post-exposure treatment and immunisation depend on the details of the exposure, the species of animal involved, and the person's immune status. CKS recommends seeking specialist advice for people considered to be at risk in line with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Guidelines on managing rabies post-exposure (January 2023) [UKHSA, 2023b], and because management may include administration of rabies vaccine with or without human rabies immunoglobulin [PHE, 2018], which is not readily available in primary care.

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Co-trimoxazole

What dosage of co-trimoxazole should I prescribe?

  • For treatment of an infected bite wound as an alternative first-choice oral antibiotic for children under 12 years where co-amoxiclav cannot be used, the dosage of oral co-trimoxazole is:
    • 6 weeks to 5 months: 120 mg or 24 mg/kg twice a day for 5 days.
    • 6 months to 5 years: 240 mg or 24 mg/kg twice a day for 5 days.
    • 6 years to 11 years: 480 mg or 24 mg/kg twice a day for 5 days.
  • For prophylaxis of a bite wound, the dosage is as described above but prescribed for 3 days. 
  • Note this is considered an off-label or unlicensed use, but is recommended in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing.

[NICE, 2020; BNF, 2022]

What are the contraindications and cautions when prescribing co-trimoxazole?

  • Do not prescribe co-trimoxazole in children:
    • With acute porphyrias.
    • With hypersensitivity to sulphonamides, trimethoprim, or co-trimoxazole.
    • With severe parenchymal hepatic disease.
    • In the first 6 weeks of life.
    • With severe renal insufficiency.
    • With previous drug-induced thrombocytopaenia from use of trimethoprim and/or sulphonamides. 
  • Prescribe co-trimoxazole with caution in children with:
    • Asthma or severe atopy.
    • Blood disorders (unless under specialist supervision).
    • G6PD deficiency (risk of haemolytic anaemia).
    • A predisposition to folate deficiency.
    • A predisposition to hyperkalaemia.

     [ABPI, 2021a; BNF for children, 2022]

What are the adverse effects of co-trimoxazole?

  • Common adverse effects of co-trimoxazole include diarrhoea, electrolyte imbalance, fungal overgrowth, headache, nausea, and skin reactions.
  • Less commonly it can cause vomiting. 
  • Rare adverse effects include thrombocytopenia and other blood disorders including leucopenia, megaloblastic anaemia, and eosinophilia. It can also cause a severe rash (including Stevens–Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis) and severe respiratory toxicity including potential progression to Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome. It should be discontinued immediately if these severe adverse effects are caused. 

[ABPI, 2021a; BNF for children, 2022]

What drug interactions are associated with co-trimoxazole?

  • ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers — caution should be exercised in patients taking any other drugs that can cause hyperkalaemia. Concomitant use of co-trimoxazole may result in hyperkalaemia.
  • Azathioprine — there are conflicting clinical reports of interactions between azathioprine and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, resulting in serious haematological abnormalities.
  • Cyclosporin — reversible deterioration in renal function has been observed in patients treated with co-trimoxazole and cyclosporin following renal transplantation.
  • Folinic acid — folinic acid supplementation has been shown to interfere with the antimicrobial efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
  • Lamivudine — concomitant co-trimoxazole causes an increase in lamivudine exposure.
  • Methotrexate — co-trimoxazole may increase the free plasma levels of methotrexate. If co-trimoxazole is considered appropriate therapy a folate supplement should be considered.
  • Phenytoin — co-trimoxazole prolongs the half-life of phenytoin and if co-administered could result in an excessive phenytoin effect. Close monitoring of the patient's condition and serum phenytoin levels are advisable.
  • Pyrimethamine — occasional reports suggest that patients receiving pyrimethamine at doses in excess of 25 mg weekly may develop megaloblastic anaemia should co-trimoxazole be prescribed concurrently.
  • Repaglinide — trimethoprim may increase the exposure of repaglinide which may result in hypoglycaemia.
  • Spironolactone — caution should be exercised in patients taking any other drugs that can cause hyperkalaemia. Concomitant use of co-trimoxazole may result in hyperkalaemia.
  • Sulfonylureas — interaction with co-trimoxazole is uncommon, but potentiation has been reported.
  • Warfarin — co-trimoxazole has been shown to potentiate the anticoagulant activity of warfarin. Careful control of the anticoagulant therapy during treatment with co-trimoxazole is advisable.
  • Zidovudine — in some situations, concomitant treatment with zidovudine may increase the risk of haematological adverse reactions to co-trimoxazole. If concomitant treatment is necessary, consideration should be given to monitoring of haematological parameters.

[ABPI, 2021a]

Co-amoxiclav

What dosage of co-amoxiclav should I prescribe?

  • For treatment of an infected bite wound, the dosage of oral co-amoxiclav is:
    • Adult: 250/125 mg or 500/125 mg 3 times a day for 5 days
    • Child 1–11 months: 0.25 mL/kg of 125/31 suspension three times a day for 5 days. 
    • Child 1–5 years: 0.25 mL/kg or 5 ml of 125/31 suspension three times a day, for 5 days. 
    • Child 6–11 years: 0.15 mL/kg or 5 ml of 250/62 suspension three times a day, for 5 days. 
    • Child 12–17 years: 250/125 mg or 500/125 mg 3 times a day for 5 days. 
  • For prophylaxis of a bite the dosage is as described above but prescribed for 3 days in both adults and children. 
  • Co-amoxiclav 400/57 suspension may be considered to allow for twice-daily dosing.

[NICE, 2020; ABPI, 2021b; BNF, 2022; BNF for children, 2022] 

What are the contraindications and cautions when prescribing co-amoxiclav?

  • Do not prescribe co-amoxiclav in people with:
    • A true penicillin allergy — allergic reactions to penicillins occur in 1–10% of exposed individuals; anaphylactic reactions occur in fewer than 0.05% of treated patients.
      • Note: Gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (for example nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin. See the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for more information.
    • A history of co-amoxiclav- or penicillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe co-amoxiclav with caution in people with:
    • A hypersensitivity to cephalosporins — there is some evidence of partial cross-allergenicity. 
    • Hepatic impairment – monitor closely.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) — reduce the dose if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 or less.
    • Acute lymphocytic leukaemia, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, cytomegalovirus infection, glandular fever — increased risk of erythematous rashes.

 [ABPI, 2021b; BNF, 2022; BNF for children, 2022]

What are the adverse effects of co-amoxiclav?

  • Gastrointestinal — diarrhoea (very common), nausea and vomiting (common), drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (unknown frequency).
    • Very rarely: antibiotic-associated colitis.
  • Nervous system — headache, dizziness (uncommon), aseptic meningitis (unknown frequency).
  • Skin — skin rash, urticaria, pruritus (uncommon), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (unknown frequency).
    • Very rarely: erythema multiforme, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.
  • Other rare, or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice.
    • Hyperactivity, convulsions.
    • Hypersensitivity reactions (serious and occasionally fatal).  
    • Interstitial nephritis.
    • Linear IgA disease (renal deposition of IgA).  
    • Leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia.
    • Kounis syndrome (an allergic reaction which can cause myocardial infarction). 
  • Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE) are adverse effects of unknown frequency.

[BNF, 2023; ABPI, 2023; EMC, 2024a]

What drug interactions are associated with co-amoxiclav?

  • Allopurinol — concomitant use of allopurinol and amoxicillin may increase the incidence of skin rashes.
  • Methotrexate — co-amoxiclav may reduce methotrexate clearance, causing an increased risk of toxicity.
    • Monitor methotrexate levels more closely. One recommendation is to carry out twice weekly platelet and white cell counts for 2 weeks initially, with the measurement of methotrexate levels if toxicity is suspected.
  • Mycophenolate mofitil — reduction in the level of active metabolite may occur when given with co-amoxiclav.
  • Oral anticoagulants (warfarin, phenindione, acenocoumarol) — prolongation of prothrombin time has been reported in people taking penicillins and warfarin concurrently.
    • Monitor the prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) more closely with the addition or withdrawal of a penicillin. Adjustment of the anticoagulant dose may be necessary. 
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of co-amoxiclav.
  • Probenecid — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of amoxicillin, but not clavulanic acid.

[ABPI, 2021b; BNF, 2022; CoSRH, 2022]

Doxycycline

What dosage of doxycycline should I prescribe?

  • For treatment of an infected bite wound, the dosage of oral doxycycline is:
    • Adults and young people aged 12–17 years: 200 mg on the first day and then 100 mg or 200 mg daily for a further 4 days (in addition to metronidazole 400 mg three times a day). [NICE, 2020].
      • Child: doxycycline is contraindicated in children less than 12 years of age because of the risk of dental staining and hypoplasia [BNF for children, 2022].
  • For prophylaxis the dosage is as described above and prescribed for a total of 3 days [NICE, 2020].

What are the contraindications and cautions when prescribing doxycycline?

  • Do not prescribe doxycycline in:
    • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, and children younger than 12 years of age.
      • Tetracyclines are deposited in growing bone and teeth which can result in discolouration of teeth and occasionally dental hypoplasia.
  • Prescribe doxycycline with caution in people with:
    • Hepatic impairment and those receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs.
    • Myasthenia gravis — tetracyclines may increase muscle weakness in people with myasthenia gravis.
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) — tetracyclines may exacerbate SLE symptoms.
    • Renal impairment — avoid excessive doses.
    • Alcohol dependence - alcohol may decrease the half-life of doxycycline.
  • Advise that the capsules should be swallowed with plenty of water in either the sitting or standing position and well before going to bed at night to lower the risk of oesophageal irritation and ulceration. 

[ABPI, 2021c; BNF, 2022]

What are the adverse effects of doxycycline?

  • Blood disorders — haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, eosinophilia (rare).
  • Gastrointestinal — nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (common), dyspepsia (uncommon). Abdominal discomfort, tooth discolouration, and enamel hypoplasia in children (frequency unknown).
    • Rarely: dysphagia, oesophagitis, oesophageal irritation, pseudomembranous colitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated. (Advice to swallow the capsules with plenty of water, in an upright position, and well before going to bed helps to reduce the frequency of oesophagitis and oesophageal ulceration.)
  • Immune system disorders – hypersensitivity common (including anaphylaxis, angioedema, exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus, Henoch-Schonlein purpura). Rarely drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).
  • Hepatic disorders – hepatotoxicity, hepatitis, jaundice, hepatic failure (frequency unknown).
  • Renal disorders — blood urea increased.
  • Skin — photosensitivity, rash (common).
    • Rarely: toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, exfoliative dermatitis, and fixed eruption.
  • Other rare adverse effects include:
    • Arthralgia, myalgia.
    • Flushing.
    • Severe headache and/or visual disturbances — may be an early symptom of benign intracranial hypertension, a rare but serious adverse effect. Headache is a relatively common side effect.
    • Tinnitus.

 [BNF, 2022; EMC, 2024b]

What drug interactions are associated with doxycycline?

  • Antacids (containing aluminium, bismuth, calcium, or magnesium) and other medications containing iron or zinc — these reduce the absorption of tetracyclines if taken concurrently.
    • Avoid taking antacids and other medications containing iron or zinc, 2 hours before or after taking tetracyclines.
  • CYP3A enzyme inducers (phenobarbital, carbamazepine, or phenytoin) — these may reduce the serum half-life of doxycycline and decrease the concentration of doxycycline. Monitor and adjust the dose if necessary.
  • Insulin — the blood-glucose lowering effect may be increased if taken with doxycycline. Monitor blood-glucose levels.
  • Iron — Oral iron may decrease absorption of oral doxycycline, so doxycycline should be taken 2 to 3 hours after iron.
  • Lithium — levels may be increased by doxycycline. Consider increasing the frequency of lithium monitoring.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of doxycycline.
  • Retinoids — there is a possible increased risk of benign intracranial pressure if tetracyclines are used concurrently with retinoids (such as isotretinoin).
    • Avoid the concurrent use of tetracyclines and retinoids.
  • Rifampicin — doxycycline levels may be reduced, which may lead to treatment failure. Monitor the effects and increase doxycycline dose if necessary.
  • Warfarin — the concurrent use of warfarin and other anticoagulants with tetracyclines may increase the anticoagulant effect. 
    • Consider monitoring the person's international normalized ratio (INR) regularly and within 3 days of starting the tetracycline. Adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
    • Other anticoagulants: Acenocoumarol, phenindione  — the manufacturer recommends monitoring INR.

[ABPI, 2021c; BNF, 2022; CoSRH, 2022]

Metronidazole

What dosage of metronidazole should I prescribe?

  • For treatment of an infected bite wound, metronidazole is recommended as an alternative first-choice antibiotic for those unable to take co-amoxiclav. It is co-prescribed with doxycycline. For adults and young people aged 12 to 17 years, the dosage of oral metronidazole is 400 mg 3 times a day for 5 days.
  • For prophylaxis of a bite in the same age range the dose is the same, but is prescribed for 3 days. 

[NICE, 2020]

What are the contraindications and cautions when prescribing metronidazole?

  • Do not prescribe metronidazole in people with:
    • Known metronidazole hypersensitivity.
  • Prescribe metronidazole with caution in people with:
    • Cockayne syndrome — cases of severe hepatotoxicity/acute hepatic failure, including cases with a fatal outcome with very rapid onset after treatment initiation in patients with Cockayne syndrome have been reported with products containing metronidazole for systemic use (oral and suppositories). Only prescribe after careful benefit-risk assessment and only if no alternative treatment is available. Liver function tests must be performed just prior to the start of therapy, throughout, and at the end of treatment until liver function is within normal ranges, or until the baseline values are reached.
    • Active or chronic severe peripheral and central nervous system disease, as there is a risk of neurological aggravation.
    • Severe liver disease or hepatic encephalopathy — prescribe one-third of the daily dosage once daily.

[ABPI, 2021d; BNF, 2022]

What are the adverse effects of metronidazole?

  • Blood disorders — agranulocytosis, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia (very rare).
  • Eye — transient diplopia, myopia (very rare).
  • Gastrointestinal — nausea, vomiting, anorexia, epigastric pain, taste disturbances, furred tongue, oral mucositis (unknown frequency). 
  • Nervous system — drowsiness, dizziness, convulsions, headaches, encephalopathy (very rare)
  • Psychiatric — confusion, hallucinations (very rare).
  • Skin — rash, pruritus, flushing, erythema multiforme, Stevens–Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis, fixed drug eruption (very rare).
  • Other rare, or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Anaphylaxis.
    • Darkening of urine.
    • Hearing impairment, tinnitus.
    • Liver enzyme increases, jaundice, pancreatitis.
    • Myalgia, arthralgia.
    • Severe bullous skin reactions such as Stevens-Johnson–syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), or acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported. If symptoms/signs are present, treatment must be immediately discontinued.

[ABPI, 2021d; BNF, 2022]

What drug interactions are associated with metronidazole?

  • Alcohol — some people taking metronidazole experience a disulfiram-like reaction with alcohol.
    • Warn the person that they might experience this reaction if they drink alcohol whilst on metronidazole and for at least 48 hours afterwards. 
  • Busulfan — plasma levels of busulfan may be increased leading to toxicity. Avoid high doses of busulfan. If conventional doses of busulfan are given, monitor blood count weekly.
  • Ciclosporin — levels of ciclosporin may be increased. If co-administration of metronidazole and ciclosporin is necessary, serum ciclosporin levels and serum creatinine should be closely monitored.
  • Disulfiram — increased risk of acute psychoses when given with metronidazole.
  • Fluorouracil — metronidazole reduces the clearance of 5-fluorouracil, increasing the risk of toxicity.
  • Lithium — seek specialist advice regarding the use of metronidazole with lithium, as metronidazole increases the risk of lithium toxicity. Lithium dose reduction may be required due to the risk of renal damage with concurrent use. Plasma concentrations of lithium, creatinine, and electrolytes should be monitored if metronidazole and lithium are used simultaneously.
  • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of metronidazole.
  • Phenobarbital and phenytoin — the metabolism of metronidazole is increased significantly. The dose of metronidazole may need to be increased.
  • Warfarin — the anticoagulant effects of warfarin may be increased by metronidazole. 
    • Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. 
  • The manufacturers SPC also notes that QT prolongation has been reported (unknown frequency), particularly when metronidazole was administered with drugs with the potential for prolonging the QT interval.

[BNF, 2022]  [CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2023]

What should I consider before prescribing paracetamol or ibuprofen?

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2020] and the Public Health Wales guideline Health Protection Team Guidance for the Management of Human Bite Injuries in Wales (2019) [Public Health Wales, 2019], as well as expert opinion in review articles cited in each section. Recommendations on the assessment of the risk of tetanus, rabies, and blood-borne virus transmission and recommendations on the management of these risks are largely based on the relevant chapters of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publication Immunisation against infectious disease (the 'Green Book') [UKHSA, 2020].

The further rationale for the assessment, referral, and primary care management of people with a human or animal bite wound, including assessment of tetanus, rabies, and blood-borne virus risk, is outlined in the 'basis for recommendation' sections of the topic.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of human and animal bites.

Search dates

December 2017 - January 2023

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp Bites/, exp Stings/, bite$.tw.
  • exp Cat/, cat$.tw., exp Rabbit/, rabbit$.tw., exp Guinea Pig/, (guinea ADJ pig$).tw., exp Mammals/, mammal$.tw.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2021a) SPC for Co-Trimoxazole 40mg/200mg per 5ml Paediatric Suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021b) SPC for Co-amoxiclav tablets BP 250/125mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021c) SPC for Doxycycline 100mg capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021d) SPC for Metronidazole 400mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2023) SPC for Co-amoxiclav 250/62.5 mg/5 ml Powder for Oral Suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Alifragki, A., Kontogianni, A., Protopapa, I., et al. (2022) Infective endocarditis by Pasteurella Species: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine 11(17), 5037. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Aziz, H., Rhee, P., Pandit, V., et al. (2015) The current concepts in management of animal (dog, cat, snake, scorpion) and human bite wounds. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 78(3), 641-648. [Abstract]
  • Bhaumik, S., Kirubakaran, R. and Chaudhuri, S. (2019) Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bites (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 12. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2023) Animal bites. BMJ Publishing Group. https://bestpractice.bmj.com
  • British National Formulary for Children (2022) British National Formulary for Children. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
  • BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • BNF (2023) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • CDC (2020) Cat Scratch Disease (Bartonella henselae infection). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Free Full-text]
  • Chhabra, S., Chhabra, N. and Gaba, S. (201) Maxillofacial injuries due to animal bites. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 14(2), 142-153. [Abstract]
  • Cook, J. A., Sasor, S. E., Soleimani, T., et al. (2020) An Epidemiological Analysis of Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries Over a Decade. Journal of Surgical Research 246, 231-235. [Abstract]
  • CoSRH (2022) Drug interactions with hormonal contraception. The College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. https://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
  • Costacurta, M., Benavoli, D., Arcudi, G. and Docimo, R. (2016) Oral and dental signs of child abuse and neglect. Oral and Implantology 8(2), 68-73. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Cresswell, F., Waters, L., Briggs, E., et al. (2016) UK guideline for the use of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure, 2015. International Journal of STD and AIDS 27(9), 713-738. [Abstract]
  • Cresswell, F., Asanati, K., Bhagani, S., et al. (2022) UK Guideline for the use of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis 2021. HIV Medicine 23(5), 494-545. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • De Keuster, T., Lamoureux, J. and Kahn, A. (2006) Epidemiology of dog bites: a Belgian experience of canine behaviour and public health concerns. Veterinary Journal 172(3), 482-487. [Abstract]
  • DermNet NZ (2015) Human bite. DermNet. https://dermnetnz.org [Free Full-text]
  • Edens, M.A., Michel, J.A. and Jones, N. (2016) Mammalian bites in the emergency department: recommendations for wound closure, antibiotics, and postexposure prophylaxis. Emergency Medicine Practice 18(4), 1-20. [Abstract]
  • Ellis, R. and Ellis, C. (2014) Dog and cat bites. American Family Physician 90(4), 239-243. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023) SPC for flagyl 400mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024a) SPC for augmentin 625 mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024b) SPC for vibramycin-D dispersible tablets 100 mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Evgeniou, E., Markeson, D., Iyer, S. and Armstrong, A. (2013) The management of animal bites in the United Kingdom. Eplasty 13, e27. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Fernandez, R., Green, H. L., Griffiths, R. Atkinson, R.A. and Ellwood, L.J. (2022) Water for wound cleansing (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 9. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Greene, S.E. and Fritz, S.A. (2021) Infectious complications of bite injuries. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 35(1), 219-236. [Abstract]
  • Honnorat, E., Seng, P., Savini, H., et al. (2016) Prosthetic joint infection caused by Pasteurella multocida: a case series and review of literature. BMC Infectious Diseases 16(1), 435. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Hurt, J.B. and Maday, K.R. (2018) Management and treatment of animal bites. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants 31(4), 27-31. [Abstract]
  • Jakeman, M., Oxley, J. A., Owczarczak-Garstecka, S. C. and Westgarth, C. (2020) Pet dog bites in children: management and prevention. BMJ Paediatrics Open 4(1), e000726. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Kennedy, S.A., Stoll, L.E. and Lauder, A.S. (2015) Human and other mammalian bite injuries of the hand: evaluation and management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 23(1), 47-57. [Abstract]
  • Lloret, A., Egberink, H., Addie, D., et al. (2013) Pasteurella multocida infection in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 15(7), 570-572. [Abstract]
  • Looke, D. and Dendle, C. (2015) Bites (mammalian). BMJ Clinical Evidence 2015, 0914. [Free Full-text]
  • Maniscalco, K. and Edens, M.A. (2022a) Human Bites. StatPearls (Internet); National Library of Medicine. http://hhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books [Free Full-text]
  • Maniscalco, K. and Edens, M.A. (2022b) Animal Bites. StatPearls (Internet); National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books [Free Full-text]
  • Medeiros, I. and Saconato, H. (2001) Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Miranda, I., Angulo, M. and Amaya, J.V. (2013) Acute total knee replacement infection after a cat bite and scratch: a clinical case and review of the literature. Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia 57(4), 300-305. [Abstract]
  • Morgan, M. (2005) Hospital management of animal and human bites. Journal of Hospital Infection 61(1), 1-10. [Abstract]
  • Morgan, P. and Palmer, J. (2007) Dog bites. BMJ 334(7590), 413-417. [Abstract]
  • Murphy, J. and Qaisi, M. (2021) Management of human and animal bites. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 33(3), 373-380. [Abstract]
  • NaTHNaC (2022) Rabies. National Travel Health Network and Centre. https://travelhealthpro.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2017a) Child maltreatment: when to suspect maltreatment in under 18s. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2017b) Child abuse and neglect. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2020) Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE (2018) The Green Book Chapter 27: Rabies. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE (2019) Tetanus: Guidance on the management of suspected tetanus cases and on the assessment and management of tetanus-prone wounds. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Public Health Wales (2019) Health Protection Team Guidance for the Management of Human Bite Injuries in Wales (2019). Public Health Wales. https://phw.nhs.wales [Free Full-text]
  • Rasmussen, D., Landon, A., Powell, J. and Brown, G. (2017) Evaluating and treating mammalian bites. JAAPA 30(3), 32-36. [Abstract]
  • Rothe, K., Tsokos, M. and Handrick, W. (2015) Animal and human bite wounds. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 112(25), 433-443. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Stevens, D., Bisno, A., Chambers, H., Dellinger, E., et al. (2014) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59(2), 147-159. [Abstract]
  • Tande, A.J. and Patel, R. (2014) Prosthetic joint infection. Clinical Microbiology Review 27(2), 302-345. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Tulloch, J. S. P., Owczarczak-Garstecka, S. C., Fleming, K. M., et al. (2021) English hospital episode data analysis (1998-2018) reveal that the rise in dog bite hospital admissions is driven by adult cases. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1767. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Tulloch, J.S.P., Oxley, J.A., Christley, R.M. and Westgarth, C. (2023) Dog-related deaths registered in England and Wales from 2001 to 2021. Public Health 215, 91-93. [Abstract]
  • UKHSA (2020) Immunisation against infectious disease (the Green Book). UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • UKHSA (2022a) Tetanus: the green book, chapter 30. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • UKHSA (2022b) Hepatitis B: the green book, chapter 18. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • UKHSA (2023a) Rabies risks in terrestrial animals by country. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • UKHSA (2023b) Guidelines on managing rabies post-exposure. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Westgarth, C., Brooke, M. and Christley, R.M. (2018) How many people have been bitten by dogs? A cross-sectional survey of prevalence, incidence and factors associated with dog bites in a UK community. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 72(4), 331-336. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • WHO (2018) Animal bites. World Health Organisation. http://www.who.int [Free Full-text]
Change privacy settings