This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Kidney disease and urology Men's health

Prostate cancer

Last revised in June 2026

Prostate cancer is a malignant tumour of the prostate. Almost all cancers of the prostate (95%) are adenocarcinomas.

Prostate cancer: Summary

  • Prostate cancer is a malignant tumour of the prostate. Almost all cancers of the prostate (95%) are adenocarcinomas.
  • Prostate cancer is multifocal — the different foci may be caused by different genetic mutations, which can differ greatly in growth rate and ability to metastasize.
  • Most prostate cancers are indolent and grow slowly — a minority are aggressive and invade local structures or metastasize to remote tissues. 
    • Localized prostate cancer usually develops in the outer zone of the prostate, where it seldom causes symptoms.
    • Locally advanced prostate cancer extends beyond the capsule of the prostate and is often asymptomatic when diagnosed.
    • Metastatic prostate cancer most frequently affects the bones, where it causes pain and fragility fractures. 
  • Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men, and the second most common cause of cancer death in males in the UK (after lung cancer).  
  • Risk factors for developing prostate cancer include:
    • Increasing age.
    • Black ethnicity.
    • Family history of prostate cancer.
  • Prostate cancer should be suspected in people who have any of the following symptoms that are unexplained:
    • Lower back or bone pain.
    • Lethargy.
    • Erectile dysfunction.
    • Haematuria.
    • Anorexia/weight loss.
  • Assessment of a person with suspected prostate cancer should include, where appropriate:
    • A digital rectal examination (DRE).
    • A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test.
  • Urgent referral to a urological cancer specialist should be arranged if prostate cancer is suspected either because the prostate is hard and nodular on DRE, or there is benign enlargement (smooth, firm, enlarged gland).
  • Urgent referral should be considered if a person's PSA level is above the threshold for their age (for example, more than 4.5 in a person aged 60–69 years). The person's preferences and any comorbidities should be taken into consideration when making the decision.
  • Treatment for prostate cancer is initiated and managed in secondary care.
  • Primary care will be involved in shared care with follow up and monitoring.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 30 years onwards (Male).

This CKS topic covers the primary care assessment and management of men with prostate cancer. 

This CKS topic does not cover in detail the secondary care management of prostate cancer.

There are separate CKS topics on LUTS in men, Prostatitis - acute, Prostatitis - chronic, Palliative care - general issues, Palliative cancer care - pain, Palliative care - constipation, and Palliative care - oral.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

June 2026 — minor update. Added UK NSC screening announcement (and relevant research and references) to screening for prostate cancer section. Minor typographical error corrected. 

Previous changes

March 2026 — minor update. Update to Assessment section.  

January 2026 — minor update. Added detail on the range of potential false negative testing for PSA.

August 2025 — minor update. Added prevalence data on mortality by ethnicity. Added information relating to Black men being more likely to have metastatic cancer at time of diagnosis. Revised wording on PSA testing in men over the age of 79 and added further information to the basis for information regarding the difference between advice from NICE and the AoMRC in this age group. 

June 2025 — minor update. Typographical error in PSA table corrected and a broken link replaced. 

April 2025 — minor update. Added more detailed information on PSA referral thresholds for men over the age of 79. 

March 2025 — minor update. Typographical error in PSA table corrected. 

September 2024 — minor update. Added AoMRC reference to the assessment table for PSA level. 

August 2024 — minor update. Following communication from an expert reviewer the topic has been updated to include recent research specifically on the asymptomatic nature of the presentation of prostate cancer, mortality and ethincity, prognostic models, change of terminology from Gleason score to Grade Group, additional information about PSA testing in men over the age of 79, and refinements to the outline of the active surveillance approach and applicability to different Cambridge Prognostic Groups. 

June 2024 — minor update. Meningioma added as an adverse effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate and caution is advised when prescribing medroxyprogesterone acetate to people with a history of meningioma, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

February 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. The main changes to the topic are as follows:

  • Recommendations on risk stratification for people with newly diagnosed prostate cancer has been updated in line with the updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2021]. 
    • The 2019 NICE guideline used a 3-tier model for risk stratification. The NICE guideline development committee agreed that newer evidence shows 5-tier risk stratification models are better at predicting prostate cancer-specific mortality than 3-tier models. More accurate prognosis will mean that more people are given the most effective treatment. The committee recommended the 5-tier Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) model over other 5-tier models because it has been tested in UK populations.
  • The information on age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) thresholds for people with possible symptoms of prostate cancer and recommendations on referral for suspected prostate cancer have been updated in line with the updated NICE guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021].
  • The topic structure has been changed.

June 2021 — minor update. Links to Prostate Cancer UK patient resources updated.

February 2021 — minor update. Clarification of wording in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) referral for men aged 50–69 years 

October 2017 — minor update. Changes made to age ranges in the section on interpreting PSA results to reflect Public Health England (PHE) and UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) guidance. 

July to August 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in August 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. Structural changes have been made to this topic, and recommendations on PSA testing and treatments for prostate cancer have been updated in line with the latest National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.

November 2016 — minor update. The NICE quality standards for suspected cancer have been added to this topic.

May 2014 — minor update. The word prescriptions has been removed from the section on suspected spinal cord compression.

December 2013 — minor update. Broken link to Prosdex option grid fixed.

May 2013 — minor update. References to the Prostate Cancer Charity and all relevant links have been updated to Prostate Cancer UK. Duplicate links have also been removed.

March 2013 — minor update. The telephone number for NHS Direct has been updated.

January 2011 — minor correction of information about degarelix.

October 2010 to January 2011 — this is a new CKS topic. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

  • European Association of Urology (2024) Prostate cancer [Free full-text]

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 February 2022.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 February 2022.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • European Journal of Oncology (2024) Comparing the Performance of Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer [Free-full text] 

Primary evidence

  • BMC Medicine (2018) Gnanapragasam V et al The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer [Free full-text]
  • Harding, T. A., Martin, R. M., Merriel, S. W., et al. (2024). Optimising the use of the prostate-specific antigen blood test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection in primary care: report from a UK clinical consensus. British Journal of General Practice, 74(745), e534-e543. [Abstract]
  • Manfredi, C., Franco, A., Ditonno, F., et al. (2024). Prevalence and Factors Associated With Prostate Cancer Among Transgender Women. JAMA oncology. [Abstract]

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 February 2022.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 February 2022.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 February 2022.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Identify clinical features in people who may have prostate cancer.
  • Provide information and advice to enable people to make informed decisions regarding prostate-specific antigen tests.
  • Provide information on secondary care investigations and treatment options for prostate cancer.
  • Refer people who have suspected prostate cancer.
  • Follow up and monitor people with prostate cancer.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

Quality standard: Suspected cancer

  • Statement 1: GPs have direct access to diagnostic endoscopy, ultrasound, MRI, X-ray and CT for people with suspected cancer.
  • Statement 2: People presenting in primary care with symptoms that suggest oesophageal or stomach cancer have an urgent direct access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
  • Statement 3: Adults presenting in primary care with symptoms that suggest colorectal cancer, who do not meet the referral pathway criteria, have a test for blood in their faeces.
  • Statement 4: People with suspected cancer who are referred to a cancer service are given written information encouraging them to attend.

[NICE, 2017]

Quality standard: Prostate cancer

  • Statement 1: People with prostate cancer have a discussion about treatment options and adverse effects with a named nurse specialist.
  • Statement 2: People with Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) 1 localised prostate cancer for whom radical treatment is suitable are offered active surveillance.
  • Statement 3: People with Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) 2, 3, 4 and 5 localised or locally advanced prostate cancer who are offered non-surgical radical treatment are offered radical radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy in combination.
  • Statement 4: People with adverse effects of prostate cancer treatment are referred to specialist services.
  • Statement 5: People with hormone-relapsed metastatic prostate cancer have their treatment options discussed by the urological cancer multidisciplinary team.

[NICE, 2021a]

Background information

What is prostate cancer?

  • Prostate cancer is a malignant tumour of the prostate.
    • Almost all cancers of the prostate (95%) are adenocarcinomas (cancers of glandular cells).
    • Prostate cancer is multifocal — the different foci may be caused by different genetic mutations, which can differ greatly in growth rate and ability to metastasize. Most prostate cancers are indolent and grow slowly; a minority are aggressive in their tendency to invade local structures or to metastasize to remote tissues. 
  • Early prostate cancer is confined within the capsule and seldom causes symptoms.
  • Locally advanced prostate cancer extends beyond the capsule of the prostate and is often asymptomatic when diagnosed.
  • Metastatic prostate cancer most frequently affects the bones, where it causes pain and fragility fractures. 

[Neal, 2010; National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019; BMJ, 2021]

What causes it?

  • The aetiology of prostate cancer is unknown. However, a number of risk factors have been associated with development of the disease. 

[BMJ, 2021]

How common is it?

  • Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men in the UK, and the second most common cause of cancer death in males in the UK (after lung cancer) [NICE, 2021b].  
    • Each year in the UK about 47,600 people are diagnosed with prostate cancer and about 11,600 die from the disease [OHID, 2024].
    • It is estimated that 1 in 6–8 men in the UK will get prostate cancer at some point in their lives [NICE, 2020; NICE, 2021b]. 
  • Prostate cancer is predominantly a disease of older men.
    • The most common age of diagnosis is 65–69 years [OHID, 2024; UKNSC, 2021].
    • More than 50% of new cases of prostate cancer diagnosed in the UK are in men aged 70 years and older (2012 data) [NICE, 2021b]. 
    • The incidence of the disease is highest in people aged 90 years and over (2012–2014 data) [NICE, 2021b]. 
  • More prostate cancer is diagnosed in men of black ethnicity than in white men with a raised PSA. Black men are more likely to have metastatic cancer at diagnosis [National Prostatic Cancer Audit, 2025]. It is least common in Asian men []. 
  • The risk of dying from prostate cancer is approximately 1 in 24 for White men, 1 in 12 for Black men, and 1 in 44 for Asian men [Lloyd T et al, 2025 Lifetime risk of being diagnosed with, or dying from, prostate cancer by major ethnic group in England 2008-2010].
  • The number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer has been increasing over the last 10 years. This may be due to the increased uptake of PSA testing and an ageing population [Cancer Research UK, 2019; National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019].
  • Prostate cancer can also affect trans women, as the prostate is usually conserved after gender-confirming surgery, but it is not clear how common it is in this population [NICE, 2021b]. 

What are the risk factors for prostate cancer?

Risk factors for developing prostate cancer include:

  • Increasing age
    • Age is one of the strongest risk factors for prostate cancer.
    • People are at higher risk if they are aged 50 years or older [OHID, 2024]. The estimated incidence is 0.1% in men younger than 50 years [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019]. 
    • Autopsy studies show that by the age of 80 years, 70% of men will have evidence of prostate cancer [BMJ, 2021]. 
  • Black ethnicity
    • There is a higher incidence of prostate cancer in men of black ethnicity than in white men. The reason for this is unknown.
    • The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is 1 in 4 for black men, compared with 1 in 8 for white men [OHID, 2024; NICE, 2021b]. 
    • The lowest incidence rates of prostate cancer are seen in Asian people, particularly in India, China, and Japan. South Asian people living in England have a lower incidence of prostate cancer than their white counterparts (relative risk of 0.8) [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019; ]. 
  • Family history of prostate cancer and genetics
    • People are at higher risk if they have a close relative, for example a brother or father, who has had prostate cancer [OHID, 2024]. 
      • One meta-analysis reported a pooled relative risk (RR) of 2.48 in men with one first-degree relative (brother or father) with prostate cancer compared with no first-degree family history. The risk was higher if the first-degree relative was a brother (RR 3.14) than a father (RR 2.35). A RR of 4.39 was reported in men with two or more first-degree relatives with a history of prostate cancer [Kiciński, 2011; BMJ, 2021].
    • The genetic basis for the hereditary cause is still unclear, but prostate-cancer specific germline mutations (such as HOXB13) have been implicated. Germline mutations associated with other cancers (such as BRCA1/2) have also been associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019].
  • Body weight and body mass index (BMI)
    • The relationship between BMI and prostate cancer remains unclear. 
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the associations between BMI and prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The evidence showed little or no evidence of an association between BMI and risk of prostate cancer or advanced prostate cancer and strong evidence of an inverse and non-linear association between BMI and PSA [Harrison, 2020].
      • In the meta-analyses with continuous BMI, a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a percentage change in PSA of - 5.88% (95% CI - 6.87 to - 4.87). Using BMI categories, compared to normal weight men, the PSA levels of overweight men were 3.43% lower (95% CI - 5.57 to - 1.23), and obese men were 12.9% lower (95% CI - 15.2 to - 10.7). Prostate cancer and advanced prostate cancer analyses showed little or no evidence associations.
      • The authors concluded that the association between BMI and prostate cancer is likely biased if missed diagnoses are not considered.

What is the prognosis?

  • Prostate cancer is often indolent and does not lead to cancer-related mortality, and the risk of dying from prostate cancer depends on the initial disease characteristics at diagnosis [NICE, 2021b].
  • The prognostic risk for prostate cancer is calculated by taking into account the prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Grade Group, and clinical stage. These are used to allocate a prognostic group based on the Cambridge Prognostic Groups [CPG] (if there are no metastases) [Gnanapragasam, 2018]. 
  • The 10 year risk of dying of prostate cancer based on CPG are shown in table 1.
Cambridge Prognostic GroupPercentage 10 year risk of death from prostate cancer
11.9
24.2
38
413.5
531.9

 

  • For the 1 in 6 people diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer the 5 year survival rate is just 49% [NCPA, 2022].
  • Mortality rates are projected to fall by 16% between 2014–2035 to 48 deaths per 100,000 people in 2035. 

What is the staging for prostate cancer?

Table 2. Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) classification of prostate cancer.

T – Primary tumour (stage based on digital rectal examination [DRE] only)
TXPrimary tumour cannot be assessed
T0No evidence of primary tumour
T1Clinically inapparent tumour that is not palpable 
T1aTumour incidental histological finding in 5% or less of tissue resected
T1bTumour incidental histological finding in more than 5% of tissue resected
T1cTumour identified by needle biopsy (for example, because of elevated prostate-specific antigen)
T2Tumour that is palpable and confined within the prostate
T2aTumour involves half of one lobe or less
T2bTumour involves more than half of one lobe, but not both lobes
T2cTumour involves both lobes
T3Tumour extends through the prostatic capsule
T3aExtracapsular extension (unilateral or bilateral)
T3bTumour invades seminal vesicle(s)
T4Tumour is fixed or invades adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles: bladder neck, external sphincter, rectum, levator muscles, and/or pelvic wall
N — Regional (pelvic) lymph nodes†
NXRegional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0No regional lymph node metastasis
N1Regional lymph node metastasis
M – Distant metastasis‡
M0No distant metastasis
M1aNon-regional lymph node(s)
M1bBone(s)
M1cOther site(s) 

†Metastasis no larger than 0.2 cm can be designated pNmi.

‡When more than one site of metastasis is present, the most advanced category should be used.

Data from: [EUA, 2024]

What is the Grade Group?

  • The Grade Group scoring system is an internationally recognized grading system, based on examination of prostate tissue. It estimates the grade of prostate cancer according to its architectural differentiation. This was previously known as the Gleason score. 
    • When the prostate is biopsied, 10–12 cores are taken from different parts of the gland (5 or 6 per side). The two most common tumour patterns are analyzed and graded from 1–5:
      • Grade 1: small, uniform glands with minimal nuclear changes.
      • Grade 2: medium-sized acinii, separated by stromal tissue but more closely arranged.
      • Grade 3: marked variation in glandular size and organization and infiltration of stromal and neighbouring tissues.
      • Grade 4: marked atypical cytology with extensive infiltration.
      • Grade 5: sheets of undifferentiated cells.

[National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019]  [EUA, 2024]

Prognostic stratification for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer

Table 3. Risk stratification for men with localized prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Grade Group, and Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) clinical stage.

Cambridge Prognostic Group Criteria
1

Gleason score 6 (grade group* 1)

and

PSA less than 10 microgram/L

and

Stages T1–T2

2

Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (grade group* 2)

or

PSA 10–20 microgram/L

and

Stages T1–T2 

3

Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (grade group* 2)

and

PSA 10–20 microgram/L

and

Stages T1–T2 or Gleason 4 + 3 = 7 (grade group* 3) and Stages T1–T2

4

One of: Gleason score 8 (grade group* 4), PSA more than 20 microgram/L, Stage T3 

5

Two or more of: Gleason score 8 (grade group* 4), PSA more than 20 microgram/L, Stage T3

or

Gleason score 9–10 (grade group* 5)

or

Stage T4 

*This refers to the 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology grade groupings for prostate cancer.
Data from: [NICE, 2021b]

What are the complications?

  • The complications of prostate cancer include:
    • Local invasion
      • Prostate cancer can be locally invasive and cause symptoms such as lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile dysfunction, urinary retention, pain, or haematuria.  
    • Bone metastases
      • Metastasizing prostate cancer most commonly spreads to the bones, where it can cause pain, pathological fractures, or spinal cord compression.
  • For more information, see the section on Management of complications and adverse effects of treatment.

[EUA, 2024]

Diagnosis of prostate cancer

How should I assess a person with suspected prostate cancer?

  • Most people with prostate cancer are asymptomatic. 
  • Suspect prostate cancer in men who have any of the following symptoms that are unexplained:
    • Lower back or bone pain.
    • Lower urinary tract symptoms. For more information, see the CKS topic on Urinary tract infection (lower) - men. 
    • Lethargy.
    • Erectile dysfunction.
    • Visible haematuria.
    • Anorexia/weight loss
  • Consider offering a digital rectal examination (DRE).
    • DRE allows assessment of the prostate for signs of prostate cancer (a hard gland, sometimes with palpable nodules) or benign enlargement (smooth, firm, enlarged gland).
    • It is important to note that the DRE sensitivity for prostate cancer has been shown to be very poor in the absence of a raised prostatic-specific antigen test. 
    • Note that a gland that feels normal does not exclude a tumour.
  • Consider prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
    • Before offering PSA testing, provide appropriate information and advice to enable the person to make an informed choice about testing. This should include information on the benefits and limitations of PSA testing, in addition to relevant decision aids and online sources of information.
    • If appropriate, arrange testing. PSA testing should be:
      • Considered in men with suspected prostate cancer.
      • Offered to men with a BRCA2 gene variant as part of the proposed national screening programme. 
    • A normal PSA level ranges from 0–4 nanograms/mL. However, the upper level of normal may vary according to age and race.
  • Refer the person using a suspected cancer pathway referral if their prostate feels malignant on DRE.
  • Consider referring a person with possible symptoms of prostate cancer using a suspected cancer pathway referral if their PSA level is above the threshold for their age in Table 3. Take into account the person's preferences and any comorbidities when making the decision.
  • Secondary care assessment for people with suspected prostate cancer may include:
    • A prostate biopsy — to confirm or exclude the diagnosis.
    • Imaging — to assess the stage of the prostate cancer.

Table 3. Age-specific PSA thresholds for people with possible symptoms of prostate cancer.

Age (years)Prostate-specific antigen threshold (nanograms/mL)
Below 40Use clinical judgement
40–49More than 2.5
50–59More than 3.5
60–69More than 4.5
70–79More than 6.5
Above 79

NICE advise use clinical judgement

AoMRC advise more than 20 or more than 7.5 and symptoms suggestive of metastatic disease (bone pain and/or fatigue and/or unintended weight loss)

 

Data from: [NICE, 2021c] and [AoMRC, 2024]

Note: NICE reports micrograms/L, which is equivalent to nanograms/mL used by AoMRC. 

 

 

  • In those men above the age of 79 if the initial PSA test is 7.5–20 ng/mL and there are no symptoms suggestive of metastatic disease repeat the PSA once after 6 months.
  • After repeating PSA refer via a suspected cancer pathway if any of the following occur:
    • There are symptoms suggestive of metastatic disease.
    • The PSA level has risen above 20.
    • The PSA has more than doubled and the patient has a performance status of 0 or 1. 
  • If patients do not fit any of these criteria but there are concerns, seek appropriate support using 'advice and guidance' mechanisms. 

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing

  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced by the prostate gland. It is secreted by prostate epithelial cells into prostatic fluid, where its function is to liquefy semen and thus allow spermatozoa to move more freely. Although PSA is secreted into prostatic fluid and semen, small amounts are present in blood. 
    • Men with prostate cancer tend to have higher levels of PSA in their blood — as a result of altered prostate architecture in prostate cancer, more PSA leaks out increasing the levels in the blood. 
    • However, blood PSA is an inaccurate marker for prostate cancer because cancer can be present without increased PSA levels, and PSA levels may be increased by conditions other than cancer (such as benign prostatic enlargement, prostatitis, and urinary tract infection). Also, PSA levels tend to increase naturally with age.
  • The aim of PSA testing is to detect early prostate cancer when treatment can be offered that may cure cancer or extend life. PSA levels increase normally. See the age-specific PSA threshold table to guide referral decisions. 
    • Most men will have a PSA level less than 3 nanograms/mL. About 3 in 4 men with a raised PSA level (3 nanograms/mL or higher) will not have cancer. Around 15% of men with a normal PSA do have cancer.
    • A PSA test will not distinguish between aggressive tumours (which are at an early stage but will develop quickly) and those which are not. Further tests may provide valuable information.
  • PSA testing should be:
    • Considered in men with suspected prostate cancer.
    • Offered to men who have a BRCA 2 gene variant - as part of the proposed screening programme.
  • Before a PSA test, people should not have:
    • An active urinary infection or within previous 6 weeks.
    • Ejaculated in previous 48 hours.
    • Exercised vigorously, for example cycling, in the previous 48 hours.
    • Had a urological intervention such as prostate biopsy in previous 6 weeks.

Information and advice on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing

Before offering prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, appropriate information should be provided to enable the person to make an informed choice about testing. 

  •  Benefits of PSA testing include:
    • Early detection — PSA testing may lead to prostate cancer being detected before symptoms develop.
    • Early treatment or entry into an active surveillance programme — detecting prostate cancer early before it progresses to cause morbidity or limit life expectancy. 
  • Limitations and risks of PSA testing include:
    • False-negative PSA tests — some authors quote a rate of up to 15% of those with a normal PSA level (less than 3 nanograms/mL) who may then subsequently develop prostate cancer. 
    • False-positive PSA tests — about 75% of people with a raised PSA level (3 nanograms/mL or higher) have a negative prostate biopsy.
    • Unnecessary investigation — a false positive PSA test may lead to invasive investigations, such as prostate biopsy, and there may be adverse effects (for example bleeding or infection).
    • Unnecessary treatment — slow-growing tumours are common and may not cause any symptoms or shorten life. Some tested men may therefore face unnecessary diagnosis (overdiagnosis) of prostate cancer, as well as associated anxiety, medical tests, and treatments with adverse effects. 
    • There is a particular risk of over-diagnosing and overtreating prostate cancer in men over the age of 79 where the prevalence is highest but the proportion of cancers which are clinically significant is lowest. For many patients in this group although they may have prostate cancer it will not cause symptoms or impact their life expectancy. Tests and treatment may cause additional risks and anxiety. 
  • See the NHS information page regarding PSA testing.
  • Sources of additional information on PSA testing include:

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based largely on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2021b] and Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021c], and the Public Health England (PHE) guidelines Prostate cancer risk management programme: overview [PHE, 2016] and Advising well men about the PSA test for prostate cancer: information for GPs [OHID, 2024]. The note regarding the lack of sensitivity for DRE in detecting prostate cancer in the absence of a raised PSA is based on a meta-analysis [Matsukawa, 2024] and a retrospective study [Sajjad, 2022]. The range of PSA false-negatives is taken from a review article Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline [Tikkinen, 2018] and a retrospective analysis What is an acceptable false negative rate in the detection of prostate cancer? [What is an acceptable false negative rate in the detection of prostate cancer?]. 

When to refer

  • The information on age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) thresholds for people with possible symptoms of prostate cancer and recommendations on referral for suspected prostate cancer are based on the NICE guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021c]. In this document NICE advise that PSA testing levels and referral to specialists should be based on clinical judgement. Whereas the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges PSA Testing for men aged 80 and above [AoMRC, 2024] and the NHS England GIRFT guidance Towards Better Diagnosis & Management of Suspected Prostate Cancer [NHS England, 2024] advise that in men over the age of 79 who have a level of more than 20 or more than 7.5 and there are symptoms suggestive of metastatic disease (bone pain and/or fatigue and/or significant unintended weight loss) should be referred. 
    • For a short explanation of why the NICE guideline committee made the 2021 recommendation and how it might affect practice, see the . The guideline development group advised that 'No evidence was available specifically for people under 40 or over 79, and so the committee recommended that clinical judgement is used when deciding whether to refer people in these groups to secondary care'. 

       

    • Full details of the evidence and the NICE committee's discussion are in evidence review A: PSA testing for prostate cancer.

What should I advise about screening for prostate cancer?

  • UK national screening committee recommendations [UKNSC, 2026]:
    • The UK national screening committee recommends a targeted screening programme, involving PSA testing every 2 years, for men aged 45 to 61 who have a pathogenic BRCA2 variant with a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer.
      • There may be regional variation in the uptake of this programme, and (as of June 2026) only England has accepted. 
      • The screening programme is not currently active.
    • They do not recommend population screening for this condition.
    • They recommend that the best method of identifying and inviting the above high-risk group should be evaluated over time.
    • They do not recommend targeted screening for any other risk groups.
    • For those men where existing clinical guidance recommends annual tests are offered (such as that from the UK Cancer Genetics Group), that offer will be continued.
  • The committee concluded that screening is more likely to cause more harm than good in the whole population and in men with a family member who has had breast, ovarian or prostate cancer but who do not have a BRCA2 variant. For black men, there is ongoing uncertainty as to whether screening would cause more good than harm.
  • The main harms of prostate cancer screening include incontinence and erectile dysfunction in men who do not need treatment. For more information, see Information and advice on PSA testing.
  • People who have 1st degree relatives with identified BRCA gene variants may benefit from gene testing.
  • Advice regarding the referral of those who are not known to have the BRCA variant (and are also asymptomatic) is expected by autumn 2026.
  • Referrals should be to the local clinical genetics team.
  • See also the advice on BRCA genes and risk given by Prostate Cancer UK and the NHS advice about genetic testing.

Basis for recommendation

This information is largely based on the recommendation issued by the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) [UKNSC, 2026].

Harms associated with prostate screening

There are several harms associated with screening. They are a consequence of the additional tests that men have to get a prostate cancer diagnosis (including a biopsy of the prostate) and the treatment they may then receive. Harms can arise as early as 2 weeks after beginning treatment, and can persist for a very long time (6 years or more, or possibly a lifetime).

For example, after 6 months for men undergoing prostate surgery [NICE, 2021b]:

  • 71% will find it difficult to control their bladder.
  • 19% will be unable to control their bladder (moderate to severe urinary incontinence).
  • 3% will have moderate to severe impacts on their bowel habits.
  • 66% will experience moderate or severe erectile dysfunction.

For men undergoing radiotherapy [NICE, 2021b]:

  • 38% of men will find it difficult to control their bladder.
  • 6% will have moderate to severe urinary incontinence.
  • 5% will have moderate to severe impacts on their bowel habits.
  • 48% will have moderate or severe erectile dysfunction.

Around 80% of men whose prostate cancers are identified through screening have cancers that would not be life-threatening and could be left alone without getting worse or affecting their lives [UKNSC, 2026]. These men will therefore receive treatment they do not need and the harms of screening will quickly outweigh any benefit.

The UK Cluster Randomised Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP Trial) reported that a one-off PSA test to men regardless of their risk was associated with a small reduction in mortality after 10 years: out of every 1,000 men invited for a PSA test, one less man died from prostate cancer than would have without a screening programme [Martin, 2018]. But, even with only a one-off screen, men were still at a very high risk of being overdiagnosed and overtreated for prostate cancer.

A second analysis of the CAP data was published in 2024 and this study reported that the risk of death 15 years after the PSA test was reduced by only 0.09% compared to men who were not invited to have a PSA test [Martin, 2024]. This UK study highlighted that a one-off PSA test to screen for prostate cancer had a small effect on mortality from prostate cancer and no effect on overall survival. Yet, the harms from treatments (see above) were apparent in men at the 15-year follow-up.

Further research

The Transform trial, researching the best ways to detect prostate cancer earlier, will be expanded so that all eligible Black men – aged 45 to 74, who have not had a PSA test or prostate MRI scan in the last five years – will be invited to take part in stage 2 of the trial [UKNSC, 2026].

Management

Scenario: Management

From age 30 years onwards (Male).

How is prostate cancer managed?

Treatment options for prostate cancer

  • Watchful waiting is part of a strategy for 'controlling' rather than 'curing' prostate cancer and is aimed at people with localized prostate cancer who are either not suitable for, or do not ever wish to receive, curative treatment, and instead involves the deferred use of hormone therapy.
    • Watchful waiting avoids the use of surgery or radiation, but implies that curative treatment will not be available; people on watchful waiting who require treatment would receive long-term hormone therapy to control their cancer. A significant number of people on watchful waiting follow up need no treatment at all during the rest of their lives.
    • Watchful waiting is often suitable for older men, men with significant comorbidities, or those with slowly progressing tumours who are likely to die of other causes and not suffer significant morbidity from their prostate cancer. It is an option for men in any prognostic risk group.
  • Active surveillance is part of a strategy aimed at people with early prostate cancer to avoid over-treatment of disease which is unlikely to cause harm. Surveillance is continued unless there are signs of disease progressing to a point where treatment is necessary.  
    • Active surveillance may avoid or delay the need for radiotherapy or surgery. 
    • The difference from watchful waiting is that repeating the prostate biopsy at intervals depending on age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels allows the man's prognostic risk category to reassessed. The aim of active surveillance is to safely reduce the risk of over treatment, as treatment is offered only when the risk increases.
  • Radical treatments include radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy. 
    • Radical prostatectomy is the surgical removal of the entire prostate gland and lymph nodes. This can be done by an open approach or by keyhole technique (laparoscopic or robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy). 
    • External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is radiotherapy given by using ionizing radiation (for example, high-energy X-rays) produced in a machine and directed at the tumour from outside the person.
    • Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy in which the radiation is given using either permanently implanted radioactive seeds (low dose rate) or temporarily inserted radioactive sources (high dose rate) directly into the prostate.
  • Adjunctive and palliative treatments include hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and bisphosphonates.
    • Hormonal treatments are the treatment of cancer by removing and/or blocking the effects of hormones which stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormonal treatments used for prostate cancer include:
      • Androgen deprivation — a treatment that lowers testosterone levels, such as surgery (bilateral orchidectomy) or treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists (such as goserelin, leuprorelin, triptorelin), or antagonists (such as degarelix). 
      • Androgen blockade — the use of drugs that bind to and block the hormone receptors of cancer cells (for example, cyproterone acetate), thus preventing androgens from stimulating cancer growth.
    • Chemotherapy is an option for men with hormone-relapsed metastatic disease. For example:
      • Docetaxel in combination with prednisolone is licensed for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.
      • Cabazitaxel in combination with prednisone or prednisolone is an option for treating metastatic hormone-relapsed prostate cancer in people whose disease has progressed during or after docetaxel.
      • A corticosteroid, such as dexamethasone, is an option as third-line therapy after androgen withdrawal and anti-androgen therapy for people with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
    • Bisphosphonates are calcium-regulated drugs which inhibit bone resorption, used in the treatment of hypercalcemia, osteoporosis, and bone pain.
      • Bisphosphonates should be offered to people who are having androgen deprivation therapy and have osteoporosis. They can also be considered for pain relief in people with hormone-refractory prostate cancer when other treatments (including analgesics and palliative radiotherapy) have failed.
      • Bisphosphonates should not be routinely offered to prevent osteoporosis in people with prostate cancer taking androgen deprivation therapy. They should not be offered to prevent bone metastases or to reduce their complications.

[National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019; NICE, 2021b]

Basis for recommendation

This information is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2021b] and the European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline Prostate cancer [EUA, 2024].

How should I follow up and monitor a person with prostate cancer?

People with prostate cancer should be followed up in primary care in line with locally agreed protocols.

  • For people who are being managed with watchful waiting:
    • Measure prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at least once a year.
    • Digital rectal examination (DRE) is not recommended on a routine basis while the PSA level remains at baseline values.
    • People with localized prostate cancer who have chosen watchful waiting and who have evidence of significant disease progression (that is, rapidly rising PSA level or bone pain) should have their situation reviewed by a urological cancer specialist.
    • Follow up people with prostate cancer who have chosen a watchful waiting regimen with no curative intent in primary care only if protocols for this have been agreed between the local urological cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) and the relevant primary care organization(s).
  • For people who are being managed with active surveillance:
    • In year 1 of active surveillance:
      • Every 3–4 months: measure prostate-specific antigen.
      • Throughout active surveillance: monitor PSA kinetics (could include PSA density and velocity).
      • At 12 months: perform a DRE.
      • At 12–18 months: multiparametric MRI.
    • In year 2 and every year thereafter until active surveillance ends:
      • Every 6 months: measure PSA.
      • Throughout active surveillance: monitor PSA kinetics (could include PSA density and velocity).
      • Every 12 months: perform a DRE.
    • If there is concern about clinical or PSA changes at any time during active surveillance, the person should be reassessed with multiparametric MRI and/or re-biopsy.  
  • For people who are being managed with radical treatment:
    • PSA levels should be measured no earlier than 6 weeks after treatment, then at least every 6 months for 2 years, and once a year thereafter.
    • After at least 6 months' initial follow up, consider a remote follow-up strategy for people with a stable PSA who have had no significant treatment complications, unless they are taking part in a clinical trial that needs formal clinic-based follow up.
    • Do not routinely offer DRE to people with localized prostate cancer who are not on active surveillance while their PSA remains at baseline levels.
  • For all people with prostate cancer:
    • Review and manage:
      • Complications of the disease, including pain, lower urinary tract symptoms, and symptoms of spinal cord compression.
      • Adverse effects from treatment, including sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Adverse effects of androgen withdrawal include change in body shape and weight gain, tiredness, hot flushes, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, gynaecomastia, and loss of bone density.
      • Impact on quality of life.
    • If biochemical relapse (rising PSA level) occurs, calculate an estimate of PSA doubling time based on a minimum of three measurements over at least 6 months.
    • Refer men with evidence of significant disease progression (rapidly rising PSA level or bone pain) to a urological cancer specialist.

Basis for recommendation

This information is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2021b].

How should I manage complications and adverse effects of treatment for prostate cancer?

How should I manage adverse effects of hormonal treatments in people with prostate cancer?

  • Hot flushes
    • Offer medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg per day, initially for a period of 10 weeks (off-label use). Evaluate the effect at the end of this treatment period.
    • Consider cyproterone acetate 50 mg twice a day for 4 weeks if medroxyprogesterone is not effective, or not tolerated.
    • Explain that there is no strong evidence to support the use of complementary therapies to treat hot flushes.
  • Fatigue
    • Offer men who are starting or taking androgen deprivation therapy supervised resistance and aerobic exercise at least twice a week for 12 weeks to reduce fatigue and improve quality of life.
  • Osteoporosis
    • Do not routinely offer bisphosphonates to prevent osteoporosis in men taking androgen deprivation therapy.
    • Consider assessing the fracture risk in men taking androgen deprivation therapy. For more information, see the section on Assessing a person for fragility fracture risk in the CKS topic on Osteoporosis - prevention of fragility fractures.
      • Offer bisphosphonates to men who have osteoporosis.
      • Consider denosumab for men in whom bisphosphonates are contraindicated or not tolerated. 
  • Gynaecomastia
    • For men starting long-term bicalutamide monotherapy (longer than 6 months), offer referral to a specialist for prophylactic radiotherapy to both breast buds within the first month of treatment. 
    • If radiotherapy is unsuccessful, consider weekly tamoxifen (off-label use). 

How should I manage pain and palliative care in a person with prostate cancer?

How should I manage radiation-induced enteropathy in a person with prostate cancer?

  • Ensure that people with signs or symptoms of radiation-induced enteropathy are offered care from a healthcare team with expertise in radiation-induced enteropathy.
    • Symptoms may include diarrhoea, faecal urgency, steatorrhoea, or rectal pain.
  • Specialist assessment is likely to involve sigmoidoscopy to ascertain the nature of the radiation injury and exclude such conditions as inflammatory bowel disease and cancer of the large bowel.

How should I manage sexual dysfunction in a person with prostate cancer?

  • Offer a phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor, such as sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil, to men who experience loss of erectile function. 
    • If PDE-5 inhibitors are ineffective or contraindicated, offer a choice of:
      • Intraurethral inserts.
      • Penile injections.
      • Penile prostheses.
      • Vacuum devices.
    • For more information, see the CKS topic on Erectile dysfunction.
  • Ensure men have access to a sexual health specialist. 
    • Consider referring men (and their partner) for psychosexual counselling.

How should I manage suspected spinal cord compression in a person with prostate cancer?

How should I manage urinary incontinence or retention in a person with prostate cancer?

  • Warn people undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer of the likely effects of the treatment on their urinary function.
    • Offer men experiencing urinary symptoms before treatment a urological assessment. 
  • Ensure people with troublesome urinary symptoms after treatment have access to specialist continence services for assessment, diagnosis, and conservative treatment. 
    • Management options include coping strategies, pelvic floor muscle re-education, bladder retraining, and pharmacological treatment. 
  • Refer people with intractable urinary incontinence to a specialist surgeon for consideration of an artificial urinary sphincter.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based largely on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2021b]. 

  • The recommendation on managing radiation-induced enteropathy is also based on expert opinion in a narrative review Radiation-induced small bowel disease: latest developments and clinical guidance [Stacey, 2014].
  • Suspected spinal cord compression management is based on the NICE guideline Metastatic spinal cord compression in adults: risk assessment, diagnosis and management [NICE, 2008].

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Medroxyprogesterone acetate

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe medroxyprogesterone acetate to people with:
    • Acute liver disease, or a history of liver disease as long as liver function tests have failed to return to normal.
    • Previous idiopathic or current venous thromboembolism.
    • Active or recent arterial thromboembolic disease (for example, angina, myocardial infarction).
    • Porphyria.
    • Known, past, or suspected breast cancer.
  • Prescribe medroxyprogesterone acetate with caution to people with:
    • Asthma.
    • A history of meningioma.
    • Cardiac dysfunction.
    • Cholelithiasis.
    • Conditions that may worsen with fluid retention.
    • Diabetes (progestogens can decrease glucose tolerance — monitor person closely).
    • Epilepsy.
    • History of depression. 
    • History of, or risk factors for, thromboembolic disorders.
    • Hypertension.
    • Liver disorders (for example, liver adenoma — seek specialist advice before use).
    • Migraine.
    • Otosclerosis.
    • Positive antiphospholipid antibodies.
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus.
    • Rheumatoid arthritis.

[Joint Formulary Committee, 2021; EMC, 2024]

Adverse effects

  • Possible adverse effects include:
    • Common or very common
      • Alopecia, constipation, depression, dizziness, fatigue, fluid retention, headache, hyperhidrosis, hypersensitivity, insomnia, increased appetite, nausea, nervousness, oedema, sexual dysfunction, skin reactions, tremor, weight changes, vomiting.
      • Congestive heart failure, corticoid-like effects, diabetes exacerbation, diarrhoea, drowsiness, dry mouth, embolism and thrombosis, euphoric mood, fever, galactorrhoea, hirsutism, hypercalcaemia, muscle spasms, tachycardia.
    • Rare or very rare
      • Cerebral infarction, jaundice; malaise, myocardial infarction.
    • Frequency not known
      • Adrenergic-like effects, cataract diabetic, concentration impaired, confusion, glycosuria, palpitations, visual impairment (discontinue if papilloedema or retinal vascular lesions).
      • Meningioma — discontinue treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate if meningioma is diagnosed. 

[Joint Formulary Committee, 2021]

Drug interactions

  • The metabolism of progestogens may be increased by concurrent use of drugs known to induce drug-metabolizing enzymes (specifically cytochrome P450 enzymes), such as: 
    • Antibiotics — rifampicin and rifabutin are very potent liver enzyme inducers.
    • Antiepileptics — carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, barbiturates, primidone, and topiramate.
    • Antiretrovirals — ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, efavirenz, and nevirapine.
    • St John's wort.

[ABPI, 2020a]

Cyproterone acetate

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe cyproterone acetate to people with:
    • Liver diseases (including Dubin–Johnson syndrome or Rotor syndrome).
    • Meningioma or a history of meningioma.
    • Previous or existing liver tumours (only if these are not due to metastases from carcinoma of the prostate).
    • Wasting diseases (with the exception of inoperable carcinoma of the prostate).
    • Existing thrombosis or embolism.
    • Malignant diseases (except for prostate cancer).
    • Rotor syndrome.
  • Prescribe cyproterone acetate with caution to people with: 
    • Diabetes mellitus.  
    • Sickle cell anaemia. 
    • A history of arterial or venous thrombotic or thromboembolic events (for example deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction).
    • A history of cerebrovascular disease.
    • Advanced cancer.
    • Severe depression.
  • Because of the risk of hepatic toxicity, liver function tests should be performed before treatment, regularly during treatment, and whenever any symptoms or signs suggestive of hepatotoxicity occur are present. Stop treatment if hepatotoxicity occurs unless the hepatotoxicity is due to other causes (for example, metastatic disease). 

[ABPI, 2020b; Joint Formulary Committee, 2021]

Adverse effects

Possible adverse effects of cyproterone acetate include:

  • Common or very common
    • Depressed mood, dyspnoea, fatigue, gynaecomastia, hepatic disorders, hot flush, hyperhidrosis, nipple pain, restlessness, weight change.
  • Uncommon
    • Skin reactions.
  • Rare or very rare
    • Galactorrhoea; meningioma (increased risk with increasing cumulative dose); neoplasms.
  • Frequency not known
    • Adrenocortical suppression, anaemia, azoospermia, hair changes, hypotrichosis, osteoporosis, sebaceous gland underactivity (may clear acne), thromboembolism.
  • In addition, direct hepatic toxicity, including jaundice, hepatitis, and hepatic failure, has been reported (fatalities reported, usually after several months, at dosages of 100 mg and above).
    • If hepatotoxicity is confirmed, cyproterone should normally be withdrawn unless the hepatotoxicity can be explained by another cause, such as metastatic disease (in which case it should be continued only if the perceived benefit exceeds the risk).

[Joint Formulary Committee, 2021]

Drug interactions

  • Possible drug interactions may occur with:
    • Thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) — cyproterone acetate may inhibit the liver enzyme CYP2C8, and thiazolidinediones are substrates of CYP2C8. Increased blood levels of these antidiabetics may require dose adjustment.
    • Statins (for example, simvastatin and atorvastatin) — the risk of statin-associated myopathy or rhabdomyolysis may be increased when co-administered with cyproterone acetate, as both statins and cyproterone acetate are metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme. 
    • Other inhibitors of the CYP3A4 enzyme — clinical interaction studies have not been performed, but it is expected that strong inhibitors of CYP3A4, such as ketoconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, and ritonavir, will inhibit the metabolism of cyproterone acetate and increase the plasma levels.
    • Inducers of the CYP3A4 enzyme — inducers of CYP3A4, such as rifampicin, phenytoin, and St John's Wort, may reduce the levels of cyproterone acetate.

[ABPI, 2020b]

Tamoxifen

Prescribing information on tamoxifen

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is based largely on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2019; NICE, 2021b].

  • The 2014 full NICE guideline on prostate cancer was updated in May 2019. The evidence reviewed and committee discussions from the 2019 update are contained in these documents. The 2014 full NICE guideline preserves evidence reviews and committee discussions for areas of the guideline that have not been updated in 2019. 
  • In 2020 and 2021, minor changes were made to the NICE prostate cancer guideline. The full, current version of the recommendations are available in the 2021 update of the NICE guideline on prostate cancer [NICE, 2021b].

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of prostate cancer.

Search dates

July 2017 - January 2022

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp Prostatic Neoplasms/, prostate cancer.tw, prostat$ cancer.tw.
  • exp Digital Rectal Examination/, exp Prostate-Specific Antigen/
  • exp Early detection of cancer/

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2020a) SPC for Provera 10 mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2020b) SPC for Cyproterone Acetate 50 mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • AoMRC (2024) PSA Testing for men aged 80 years and above. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. https://ebi.aomrc.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • BMJ (2021) Prostate cancer. BMJ Best Practice. http://bestpractice.bmj.com/info
  • Cancer Research UK (2019) What is prostate cancer? Cancer Research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024) SPC for provera 10 mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EUA (2024) Prostate cancer. European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org [Free Full-text]
  • Gnanapragasam, V.J., Bratt, O., Muir, K., et al. (2018) The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer: a validation study. BMC Medicine. [Free Full-text]
  • Harrison, S., Tilling, K. and Turner, E.L. (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between body mass index, prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, and prostate-specific antigen. Cancer Causes Control 31(5), 431-449. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Joint Formulary Committee (2021) British National Formulary (online). BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Kiciński, M., Vangronsveld, J. and Nawrot T.S. (2011) An epidemiological reappraisal of the familial aggregation of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 6(10), e27130. [Free Full-text]
  • Lloyd T et al. (2015) Lifetime risk of being diagnosed with, or dying from, prostate cancer by major ethnic group in England 2008-2010. BMC Medicine 13(171).
  • Martin, R.M., Donovan, J.L., Turner, E.L., et al. (2018) Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 319(9), 883-895. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Martin, R.M., Turner, E.L., Young, G.J., et al. (2024) Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and 15-Year Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 331(17), 1460-1470. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Matsukawa, A., Yanagisawa, T., Bekku, K., et al. (2024) Comparing the Performance of Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology Oncology. [Free Full-text]
  • National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (2019) Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment (full NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • National Prostatic Cancer Audit (2025) Geographic, socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer at time of diagnosis in England: a population-based evaluation. BMJ Oncology. [Free Full-text]
  • NCPA (2022) National Prostate Cancer Audit. National Prostate Cancer Audit. https://www.npca.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Neal,D. (2010) Oxford textbook of medicine. In: Warrell,D.A., Cox,T.M., Firth,J.D. (Eds.) Malignant diseases of the urinary tract.Oxford: Oxford University Press., 4162-4173.
  • NHS England (2024) Towards Better Diagnosis & Management of Suspected Prostate Cancer. NHS England. https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2008) Metastatic spinal cord compression: diagnosis and management of adults at risk of and with metastatic spinal cord compression (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2017) Quality Standard: Suspected cancer (QS124). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2020) NICE impact prostate cancer. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021a) Quality Standard: Prostate cancer (QS91). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021b) Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021c) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • OHID (2024) Advising well men about the PSA test for prostate cancer: information for GPs. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE (2016) Prostate cancer risk management programme: overview. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Sajjad, W., Thankappannair, V., Shah, S., et al. (2022) Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Journal of Clinical Urology. [Free Full-text]
  • Stacey, R. and Green, J.T. (2014) Radiation-induced small bowel disease: latest developments and clinical guidance. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
  • Tikkinen, K.A.O., Dahm, P., Lytvyn, L., et al. (2018) Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. [Free Full-text]
  • UKNSC (2021) Screening for prostate cancer: external review. UK National Screening Committee. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • UKNSC (2026) Prostate cancer: UK NSC screening recommendation. GOV.UK. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Verbeek JFM (2018) National Library of Medicine. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5861290
Change privacy settings