Musculoskeletal Preventative medicine
Osteoporosis - prevention of fragility fractures
Last revised in April 2025
Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility
Osteoporosis - prevention of fragility fractures: Summary
- Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. Osteoporosis itself is asymptomatic and often remains undiagnosed until a fragility fracture occurs.
- An osteoporotic fracture occurs as a consequence of increased bone fragility.
- Characteristically fractures occur in the wrist, spine, and hip.
- A fragility fracture is defined as a fracture following a fall from standing height or less.
- Vertebral fractures may occur spontaneously, or as a result of routine activities.
- In England and Wales, it is estimated that annually around 180,000 fractures occur as a result of osteoporosis.
- Risk factors for osteoporosis include:
- Female sex.
- Increasing age.
- Menopause.
- Oral corticosteroids.
- Smoking.
- Alcohol.
- Previous fragility fracture.
- Rheumatological conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthropathies.
- Parental history of hip fracture.
- Body mass index of less than 18.5 kg/m2.
- Investigations to check for non-osteoporotic causes for fragility fracture (such as metastatic bone cancer) and undiagnosed secondary causes (such as hyperthyroidism) should be arranged where appropriate, prior to calculating fracture risk.
- A 10-year fragility fracture risk score should be calculated prior to arranging a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to measure bone mineral density (BMD), or starting a bisphosphonate, except in people:
- Over 50 years of age with a history of fragility fractures — a DXA scan should be offered.
- Under 40 years of age who have a major risk factor for fragility fracture — a DXA scan should be offered, then referral to a specialist experienced in the treatment of osteoporosis depending on the BMD T-score. The T-score is the number of standard deviations below the mean BMD of young adults at their peak bone mass.
- Fragility fracture risk should be calculated using the QFracture® (preferred) or FRAX® online assessment calculators.
- People at high risk should be offered a DXA scan to confirm osteoporosis.
- People at intermediate risk whose fracture risk is close to the recommended threshold and who have risk factors that may be underestimated by FRAX®, such as people taking high doses of oral corticosteroids, should be offered a DXA scan.
- People at low risk should not be offered treatment or a DXA scan, but given lifestyle advice.
- A bisphosphonate should be offered to people with a BMD T-score of -2.5 or lower, if appropriate and there are no contraindications.
- Hormone replacement therapy can be considered in younger postmenopausal women to reduce their risk of osteoporotic fracture, and for the relief of menopausal symptoms.
- Risk factors for osteoporosis, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and calcium and vitamin D deficiency, should be managed if present.
- Risk factors for falls should be managed if present.
- Follow up should be arranged to assess and manage the:
- Adverse effects of bone-sparing treatment.
- Adherence to treatment.
- Need for continuing treatment with bisphosphonates after 5 years.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 18 years onwards.
This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guideline Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
This CKS topic covers the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, men over 50 years of age, and people of any age who are taking oral corticosteroids.
This CKS topic does not cover the prevention of osteoporosis or the prevention and management of secondary osteoporosis (other than corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis).
There are separate CKS topics on Falls - risk assessment and Menopause.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
April 2025 — minor update. QOF indicators removed in line with NHS England's 2025 Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Previous changes
January 2025 — minor update. Information about the use of risedronate in people with severe renal impairment has been clarified.
November 2024 — minor update. Recommendations from the updated National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis have been incorporated into this topic.
April 2023 — minor update. revised information about dental review prior to initiation of bisphosphonates aligned with BNF advice.
October 2022 — minor update. Recommendations on prescribing bisphosphonates in people with renal impairment updated in line with manufacturers' summaries of product characteristics.
May to July 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in May 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
May 2020 — minor update. The section on interpreting fragility fracture risk scores has been updated to clarify the SIGN recommendation that a 10-year fracture risk of 10% is considered to be the threshold for arranging a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan in men and women.
December 2016 — minor update. Information that dosage adjustments of calcium may be required in people with severe kidney disease has been added to the contraindications and cautions section for calcium and colecalciferol preparations.
July 2016 — minor update. The recommendation on alcohol intake in the section on Lifestyle information and advice has been linked to information in the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking, which has been updated in line with the Alcohol Guidelines Review published by the Department of Health (2016).
December 2015 to January 2016 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in December 2015 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring and recommendations have been clarified in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. Recommendations from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures have also been incorporated into this topic.
June 2015 — minor update. Based on an update to the Summary of Product Characteristics for Calcichew D3® chewable tablets, the interaction of calcium salts with zinc and strontium ranelate has been added, and hypersensitivity reactions have been added as possible adverse effects of calcium and vitamin D preparations.
September 2014 — minor update. Text in the section on NOGG - who to assess has been amended to clarify the NOGG recommendations on when to assess for osteoporotic fracture risk. Text in the section on Drug treatment has been rewritten to clarify when a bisphosphonate should be offered.
February 2014 — minor update. Update to the text to reflect the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) recommendations regarding strontium ranelate use, which is restricted to people who cannot be treated with other medicines approved for osteoporosis.
June to September 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of this topic. The guideline has been extensively re-written to take into account the new method of assessment recommended by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as well as new guidance issued by the National Osteoporotic Guideline Group (NOGG). The guideline also takes into account new recommendations for prescribing vitamin D issued by the Department of Health. Recommendations for Didronel PMO® (a two component drug containing 400 mg of etidronate disodium and 1250 mg of calcium carbonate) have been removed from the topic, following the discontinuation of the product.
January 2013 — minor update. Change to the text to reflect updated prescribing advice for strontium ranelate, issued by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regarding venous thromboembolism and adverse skin reactions.
October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
March 2012 — minor update. The 2012/2013 QOF indicators have been added to this topic. Issued in April 2012.
January 2012 — minor update. Minor text change clarifying the definition of a T-score reference standard. Issued in January 2012.
September 2011 — minor update. A tool to assess if postmenopausal women meet NICE eligibility criteria for DXA scanning and drug treatment to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures has been removed from the text. In addition a minor typographical error has been corrected. Issued in October 2011.
June 2011 — minor update. Prescribing information on atypical stress fractures and oral bisphosphonate treatment replaced. Issued in June 2011.
May 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. Issued in June 2011.
November 2010 to December 2010 — this is a new CKS topic. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 September 2021.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
- NICE (2022) Romosozumab for treating severe osteoporosis. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 July 2021.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Händel, M.N., Cardoso, I., von Bülow, C., et al. (2023) Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/ [Free Full-text]
- Hoong, C. W. S., Saul, D., Khosla, S., & Sfeir, J. G. (2025). Advances in the management of osteoporosis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 390, e081250. [Free Full-text]
Primary evidence
- Sato, S., Sasabuchi, Y., Okada, A., & Yasunaga, H. (2024). Incidence of new fractures in older patients with osteoporosis receiving biosimilar teriparatide or reference products: A retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. [Absract]
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 July 2021.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 July 2021.
Changes in product availability
- New product calcitriol 0.25 and 0.5 microgram is licensed for the correction of the abnormalities of calcium and phosphate metabolism in patients with renal osteodystrophy, and for the treatment of established post-menopausal osteoporosis. See more here.
- New product Angeliq (drospirenone , estradiol hemihydrate) 1 mg/2 mg film-coated tablets. Licensed as treatment of oestrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal women ≥ 1 year post menopause, and as prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fractures who are intolerant of, or contraindicated for other osteoporosis prevention therapies. See more here.
- New product Obodence (denosumab) 60 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe. This biosimilar to Prolia is licensed for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women/men with increased fracture (Fx) risks, bone loss linked to hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer with Fx risks, & treatment of bone loss linked to long-term glucocorticoid therapy. See more here.
- New product Acvybra (denosumab) 60 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe. The biosimilar to Prolia is licensed for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women & men with increased fracture risks, bone loss due to hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer & fracture risk, & bone loss associated with long-term systemic glucocorticoid treatment. See more here.
- New product Ponlimsi (denosumab) 60 mg Solution for injection in Pre-Filled Syringe. Biosimilar to Prolia is licensed for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men, bone loss associated with hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer, and bone loss associated with long-term systemic glucocorticoid therapy. See more here.
- New product: Kefdensis (denosumab) 60 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe. Biosimilar licensed for the treatment of osteoporosis, bone loss associated with hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer with increased fracture risk, and treatment of bone loss associated with long-term systemic glucocorticoid therapy in adults with increased fracture risk. See more here.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Identify people who may be at risk of osteoporotic fragility fractures.
- Formally assess a person's risk of osteoporotic fragility fracture.
- Minimize the risk of new or recurrent osteoporotic fragility fractures, including by offering bone-sparing treatment if appropriate.
Outcome measures
Audit Criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.
QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.
QIPP - Options for local implementation
NICE quality standards
The following NICE quality statements may be relevant to the primary care management of fracture risk in people with osteoporosis:
- Statement 1. Adults who have had a fragility fracture or use systemic glucocorticoids or have a history of falls have an assessment of their fracture risk.
- Statement 2. Adults at high risk of fragility fracture are offered drug treatment to reduce fracture risk.
- Statement 3. Adults prescribed drug treatment to reduce fracture risk are asked about adverse effects and adherence to treatment at each medication review.
- Statement 4. Adults having long-term bisphosphonate therapy have a review of the need for continuing treatment.
Background information
What are osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures?
- Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture.
- Osteoporosis itself is asymptomatic and often remains undiagnosed until a fragility fracture occurs.
- An osteoporotic fracture is a fragility fracture occurring as a consequence of osteoporosis. Characteristically, fractures occur in the wrist, spine, and hip, but they can also occur in the arm, pelvis, ribs, and other bones.
- A fragility fracture is defined as a fracture following a fall from standing height or less, although vertebral fractures may occur spontaneously, or as a result of routine activities such as bending or lifting.
- Osteoporosis is defined by the World Health Organization as a bone mineral density (BMD) of 2.5 standard deviations below the mean peak mass (average of young healthy adults) as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) applied to the femoral neck and reported as a T-score.
- However, BMD measurement does not assess the structural deterioration in bone and consequently, most osteoporotic fractures occur in women who do not have osteoporosis as defined by a T-score equal to or less than -2.5.
What causes osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures?
- Osteoporosis is the end result of an imbalance in the normal process of bone remodelling by osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
- During normal ageing, bone breakdown by osteoclasts increases and is not balanced by new bone formation by osteoblasts, resulting in a combination of:
- Reduced bone mineral density (BMD), which can be measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning.
- Changes in bone composition, architecture, size, and geometry.
- The age when osteoporosis becomes apparent depends on:
- Peak bone mass, which depends predominantly on genetic factors, but also levels of nutrition (particularly calcium and vitamin D), sex hormone levels (androgens and oestrogens), and level of physical activity. It is reached in the third decade and starts to decline in the fifth decade for men and women. In women, this decline accelerates after the menopause for a period of between 5 and 10 years.
- The rate of bone loss, which depends on a number of factors including oestrogen deficiency in women and decreased testosterone in older men and hyperparathyroidism.
How common is it?
- Osteoporosis
- Women are at greater risk of osteoporosis due to the decrease in oestrogen production at the menopause, which accelerates bone loss.
- The prevalence of osteoporosis increases markedly, from approximately 2% at 50 years of age to almost 50% at 80 years of age.
- In England and Wales, more than 2 million women have osteoporosis.
- Women are at greater risk of osteoporosis due to the decrease in oestrogen production at the menopause, which accelerates bone loss.
- Osteoporotic fragility fractures
- In England and Wales, around 180,000 of the fractures presenting each year are the result of osteoporosis.
- More than one in three women and one in five men will sustain one or more osteoporotic fractures in their lifetime.
- White men and women are at increased risk of fragility fracture compared with other ethnic groups.
- Vertebral fractures are often unrecognized and undiagnosed and are therefore not included in routinely collected statistics. Most of these are osteoporotic fractures.
[Johansen, 2000; NICE, 2017a; NICE, 2018; SIGN, 2020; NOGG, 2021]
What are the risk factors?
- The risk of getting an osteoporotic fracture depends on the person's risk of falls, their bone strength (determined by bone mineral density [BMD]), and other risk factors.
- Fracture risk increases progressively with decreasing BMD, but BMD is poorly sensitive at predicting fracture risk when used without considering other risk factors.
- Risk factors affecting bone strength that:
- Reduce BMD include:
- Endocrine disease including Diabetes mellitus, Hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism.
- Gastrointestinal conditions that cause malabsorption such as Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Coeliac disease, and Pancreatitis - chronic.
- Chronic kidney disease.
- Chronic liver disease.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Menopause.
- Immobility.
- Body mass index of less than 18.5 kg/m²
- Do not reduce BMD include:
- Age — risk increases with age and is at least partly independent of BMD.
- Oral corticosteroids (dependent on the dose and duration of treatment).
- Smoking.
- Alcohol (3 or more units daily).
- Previous fragility fracture (risk increases with increasing number of fractures). Risk is highest for previous hip fractures and lowest for previous vertebral fractures.
- Rheumatological conditions, such as Rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory arthropathies.
- Parental history of hip fracture.
- Have unestablished mechanisms include the use of certain drugs, such as:
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
- Proton pump inhibitors.
- Anticonvulsant drugs, in particular enzyme-inducing drugs, such as carbamazepine.
- Reduce BMD include:
- Risk factors for falls include:
- Impaired vision.
- Neuromuscular weakness and incoordination.
- Cognitive impairment.
- The use of alcohol and sedative drugs.
- For more information, see the CKS topic on Falls - risk assessment.
[Compston, 2010; NICE, 2017a; BMJ Best Practice, 2020; SIGN, 2020; NOGG, 2021]
What are the complications?
- Complications of osteoporosis are fragility fractures and their consequences:
- Hip fracture
- Almost always requires hospitalization.
- Is fatal in approximately 20% of cases.
- Causes permanent disability in approximately 50% of cases.
- Is associated with permanent recovery in only 30% of cases.
- Is associated with an up to 10-fold increased relative mortality risk in the year following fracture, although, it is unclear to what extent this can be attributed to fracture alone as opposed to pre-existing comorbidity.
- Vertebral fracture
- Osteoporotic fragility fractures may be asymptomatic: around 50–70% are clinically silent and do not come to clinical attention.
- Vertebral fractures can cause back pain (about one third of vertebral fractures present with acute and severe pain at the site of the fracture), loss of height, and kyphosis. Severe kyphosis can lead to breathing difficulties; gastrointestinal problems (such as indigestion); and difficulties in bending, reaching, and other activities of daily living.
- Is associated with a to 4.4-fold increased relative mortality risk in the year following fracture, although, it is unclear to what extent this can be attributed to pre-existing comorbidity.
- Forearm fracture
- Can cause significant pain and disability and affect a person's independence and quality of life.
- Hip fracture
[Compston, 2010; NICE, 2017a; NICE, 2018; NICE, 2019; NOGG, 2021]
Management
Scenario: Assessment
From age 18 years onwards.
Who should I assess for fragility fracture risk?
Identify high-risk groups of people to assess fragility fracture risk. Consider assessment of fracture risk in:
- All women aged 65 years and over, and all men aged 75 years and over.
- All women aged under 65 years and all men aged under 75 years who have any of the following risk factors:
- A previous osteoporotic fragility fracture.
- Current use or frequent recent use of oral corticosteroids.
- History of falls.
- Family history of hip fracture.
- Low body mass index (less than 18.5 kg/m2).
- Smoking.
- Alcohol intake of more than 14 units per week.
- A secondary cause of osteoporosis, including:
- Hypogonadism in either sex, including untreated premature menopause (menopause before 40 years of age), treatment with aromatase inhibitors (such as exemastane) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (such as goserelin).
- Endocrine conditions, including diabetes mellitus, Cushing's disease, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and hyperprolactinaemia.
- Conditions associated with malabsorption, including inflammatory bowel disease, coeliac disease, and chronic pancreatitis.
- Rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthropathies.
- Haematological conditions such as multiple myeloma and haemoglobinopathies.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Chronic liver failure.
- Chronic kidney disease.
- Immobility.
Do not routinely assess fracture risk in people aged under 50 years unless they have major risk factors:
- Current or frequent use of oral corticosteroids.
- Untreated premature menopause.
- A previous fragility fracture.
In people aged under 40 years, assess fracture risk if they have any major risk factors:
- Current or recent use of high-dose oral corticosteroids equivalent to, or more than, 7.5 mg prednisolone daily for 3 months or more.
- A previous major osteoporotic fracture.
- History of multiple fragility fractures.
Consider assessing fracture risk for people taking the following medication, especially in the presence of other risk factors:
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
- Antiepileptic medication — particularly enzyme-inducing drugs, such as carbamazepine.
- Aromatase inhibitors, such as exemastane.
- Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, such as goserelin.
- Proton pump inhibitors.
- Thiazolidinediones, such as pioglitazone.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on assessment of people with risk factors for osteoporosis are based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guideline Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
How should I assess a person for fragility fracture risk?
- Exclude non-osteoporotic causes for fragility fractures. These include:
- Metastatic bone disease — suggested by bone pain, history of cancer (especially lung, thyroid, prostate, kidney, or breast cancer), or symptoms of undiagnosed cancer (for example unexplained general malaise or weight loss).
- Multiple myeloma — suggested by bone pain, anaemia, recurrent infections, bleeding, symptoms of hypercalcaemia, or kidney disease. For further details, see the CKS topic on Multiple myeloma.
- Osteomalacia — suggested by bone pain, muscle pain, or proximal muscle weakness.
- Paget's disease — suggested by bone pain or deformity.
- Exclude secondary causes of osteoporosis (particularly in people with a fragility fracture despite apparently being at low risk), such as:
- Endocrine conditions such as untreated premature menopause in women, hypogonadism in men, diabetes mellitus, and hyperthyroidism. For further details, see the CKS topics on Menopause, Diabetes - type 1, Diabetes - type 2, and Hyperthyroidism.
- Rheumatological conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory arthropathies. For further details, see the CKS topics on Rheumatoid arthritis and Ankylosing spondylitis.
- Gastrointestinal conditions that cause malabsorption such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, coeliac disease, and chronic pancreatitis. For further details, see the CKS topics on Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Coeliac disease, and Pancreatitis - chronic.
- Chronic liver disease. For further details, see the CKS topic on Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. For further details, see the CKS topic on Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Offer a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to measure bone mineral density (BMD) without calculating the fragility fracture risk in people:
- Over 50 years of age with a history of fragility fracture.
- Younger than 40 years of age who have a major risk factor for fragility fracture — depending on the BMD T-score, refer to a specialist experienced in the treatment of osteoporosis.
- Note: commencing drug treatment without a DXA scan can be considered for people with a vertebral fracture.
- For all other people with risk factors for osteoporosis, calculate the 10-year fragility fracture risk prior to arranging a DXA scan to measure BMD.
- Consider using the online risk calculators QFracture® (preferred) or FRAX®, which predict the absolute risk of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fractures (spine, wrist, hip, or shoulder) over 10 years.
- For information on interpreting the fragility fracture risk score, see the section on How should I interpret a fragility fracture risk score?.
- Measure the BMD with DXA (at the spine and hip) in people found to be at high risk of fragility fracture.
- Measure the BMD with DXA in people whose fracture risk is close to the recommended threshold, who have risk factors that may be underestimated by FRAX®. For more information, see the section How should I interpret a fragility fracture risk score?.
- Offer oral bisphosphonates to people taking glucocorticoid therapy without waiting for bone density assessment (which should follow later) if they have any of the following risk factors:
- A prior fragility fracture.
- Women age 70 years or over.
- Postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years or over taking high dose glucocorticoids (7.5 mg or more of prednisolone daily or equivalent over 3 months).
- Postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years or over with a FRAX probability of major osteoporotic fracture or of hip fracture exceeding the intervention threshold.
- Assess for vitamin D deficiency and inadequate calcium intake.
- People are at risk of vitamin D deficiency if they are aged over 65 years, or are not exposed to much sunlight (because they are confined indoors for long periods or because they wear clothes that cover the whole body).
- A calcium intake of at least 1000 mg/day is recommended for people at increased risk of a fragility fracture. To calculate dietary calcium intake, see the National Osteoporosis Foundation chart Steps to estimate your calcium intake.
- Identify any risk factors for falls. For further details, see the CKS topic on Falls - risk assessment.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on how to assess a person at risk of fragility fracture are based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], the full NICE guideline Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk on which this was based [NICE, 2012], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guideline Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
Excluding other causes of fragility fracture
- The recommendation to exclude other causes for fragility fracture is based on the expert opinion of the guideline development group of the full NICE guideline Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk [NICE, 2012].
History of fragility fracture
- The recommendation to offer a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan without undertaking a fragility fracture risk assessment in people over 50 years of age with previous history of fragility fractures is based on expert opinion in the SIGN guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020] and the full NICE guideline Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk [NICE, 2012]. Both guidelines cite evidence from a meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies (n = 60,161), which found that previous fragility fracture was associated with an increased risk of any future fracture.
- CKS also notes that when calculating FRAX® scores, indicating that a person has had a previous fragility fracture always generates a 10-year probability of major fracture that is above the lower assessment threshold, meaning that they should be offered a DXA scan.
People younger than 40 years of age
- The recommendation to offer a DXA scan to people under 40 years of age and not use FRAX® or QFracture® to calculate fragility risk is based on the fact that these risk assessment tools are not applicable in people younger than 40 years of age.
- DXA scan is recommended in younger people who have had a fragility fracture because they may be at high risk of future fractures [NICE, 2012].
- CKS recommends seeking specialist advice on how to manage people younger than 40 years of age following a DXA scan, because there is no evidence or expert opinion available to inform management decisions.
- Be aware that despite having a substantial number of risk factors, the expert opinion of the NICE guideline development group is that the absolute risk of fragility fracture for people younger than 40 years of age may still be low [NICE, 2012].
People with vertebral fractures
- The recommendation to consider starting drug treatment in people with a vertebral fracture without a DXA scan is based on:
- The expert opinion of the SIGN guideline development group, which considers that the presence of a vertebral fracture signifies the presence of osteoporosis, even if the bone mineral density (BMD) is not within the diagnostic range [SIGN, 2020].
- Evidence that people with vertebral fractures are at increased future risk of both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures [SIGN, 2020].
Assessing fragility fracture risk
- NOGG recommends using FRAX® to assess fracture risk, SIGN recommends QFracture®, and NICE recommends either method. CKS recommends using QFracture® for calculating fragility fracture risk based on evidence that QFracture®:
- QFracture® cannot be recalculated taking BMD measurements into account. However, since the main application of QFracture® is to estimate fracture risk prior to carrying out a DXA scan, this may be less important clinically.
- FRAX® underestimates the 10-year fracture risk in people over 75 years of age compared with QFracture®.
Arranging a DXA scan
- The recommendation to measure BMD by DXA at the spine and hip following fracture risk assessment is based on:
- Evidence that measurement of BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and wrist have been shown to predict future fracture occurrence.
- A lack of evidence to support bone-sparing treatment based solely on high fracture risk (without DXA to confirm the presence of osteoporosis) to reduce fracture risk.
How should I interpret a fragility fracture risk score?
The QFracture® and FRAX® risk assessment tools predict the absolute risk of hip fracture, and major osteoporotic fractures (spine, wrist, or shoulder) over 10 years.
- A 10-year fracture risk of 10% is considered to be the threshold for arranging a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan in men and women. However, a pragmatic approach is advised and clinical judgement and local pathways should be considered.
- When using the QFracture® calculator, be aware that for women the cut off for the top 10% at highest risk is a 10-year risk of 11.1%, and for men the cut off for the top 10% at highest risk is 2.6%.
- When using FRAX®, the fracture risk is calculated and clicking on the 'view NOGG guidance' button shows a chart that plots a person's calculated risk against their age. This graphically represents a person's risk as being at low (green zone), high (red zone), or intermediate (amber zone) risk for an osteoporotic fracture.
- Be aware that FRAX® underestimates some risk factors, including:
- Regular use of corticosteroids equivalent to or less than 5 mg prednisolone daily.
- Use of corticosteroids more than or equivalent to 7.5 mg prednisolone daily for more than 3 months.
- A history of multiple fragility fractures.
- High alcohol intake.
- Heavy smoking.
- In people aged over 80 years of age, interpret the estimated 10-year fracture risk with caution, as the short-term fracture risk may be underestimated.
Table 1. How to interpret a fragility fracture risk score.
| Risk | QFracture® | FRAX® |
|---|---|---|
| High risk | Risk score is 10% or greater | Red zone of risk chart |
| Intermediate risk | Risk score is close to, but below 10% | Amber zone of risk chart |
| Low risk | Risk score is below 10% | Green zone of risk chart |
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on interpreting fracture risk scores are based on expert opinion in the full NICE guideline Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk [NICE, 2012], the short NICE guideline deriving from this Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
- The NICE guideline development group considered it beyond the scope of its guideline to recommend intervention thresholds for people being assessed for fragility fracture risk [NICE, 2012].
- SIGN recommends a fragility fracture risk threshold of 10% to indicate the need for a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan for both men and women [SIGN, 2020].
- However, the QFracture risk calculator acknowledges that there is no generally agreed threshold regarding the definition of high risk, and provides details on absolute risk and defines thresholds for men and women separately:
- For women, the cut off for the top 10% at highest risk is a 10-year risk of 11.1%.
- For men, the cut off for the top 10% at highest risk is a 10-year risk of 2.6%.
- The recommendation to treat fracture risk scores in people older than 80 years of age with caution is based on the expert opinion of the NICE guideline development group [NICE, 2012; NICE, 2017a].
Scenario: Management
From age 18 years onwards.
How should I manage fragility fracture risk scores?
- For people at high risk of fragility fracture
- For people whose fracture risk is above the recommended threshold, offer a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, then bone-sparing drug treatment if the T-score is -2.5 or lower.
- If the T-score is greater than -2.5, modify risk factors where possible, treat any underlying conditions, and repeat the DXA at an interval appropriate for the person based on their risk profile, using clinical judgement (but usually within 2 years).
- For more information, see the section on How should I follow up a person at risk of fragility fracture?.
- For people at intermediate risk of fragility fracture
- For people whose fracture risk is close to the recommended threshold and who have risk factors that may be underestimated by FRAX® , arrange a DXA scan to measure their bone mineral density (BMD) and offer drug treatment if the T-score is -2.5 or lower.
- For people at low risk of fragility fracture
- For people whose fracture risk is below the recommended threshold, do not offer drug treatment, offer lifestyle advice and follow up within 5 years.
- If measurement of bone mass density is not practicable (for example, due to frailty), use the intervention thresholds to guide treatment decisions.
- Consider referring people at very high risk to an osteoporosis specialist for assessment and consideration of parenteral treatment. For example, people:
- With important risk factors, including a recent vertebral fracture within the last 2 years.
- Who have had two or more vertebral fractures (regardless of when they occurred).
- With a BMD T-Score of -3.5 or lower.
- Taking high-dose glucocorticoids (7.5 mg or more of prednisolone daily or equivalent over 3 months).
- With multiple clinical risk factors, particularly with a recent fragility fracture indicating high imminent risk of re-fracture.
- With other indicators of very high fracture risk.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on interpretation of results are based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
What drug treatments are recommended for people at high risk of osteoporotic fracture?
- If bone-sparing treatment is indicated, offer an oral bisphosphonate if there are no contraindications and after appropriate counselling to:
- Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age who have been confirmed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to have osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] T-score of -2.5 or less).
- Offer alendronate 70 mg once weekly, or risedronate 35 mg once weekly first-line.
- If these are unsuitable or not tolerated, offer ibandronate 150 mg once monthly.
- If an oral bisphosphonate is not tolerated or is contraindicated, consider specialist referral. Specialist treatment options include zoledronic acid, strontium ranelate, raloxifene, denosumab, and teriparatide.
- Note: all oral bisphosphonates are licensed for use in postmenopausal women. However, only risedronate (once weekly) is licensed for use in men.
- Offer advice on the use of bisphosphonates and explain about possible adverse effects.
- If the person's calcium intake is adequate (700 mg/day), prescribe 10 micrograms (400 international units) of vitamin D (without calcium) for people not exposed to much sunlight. For more information, see the section on How should I assess a person for fragility fracture risk?.
- If calcium intake is inadequate:
- Prescribe 10 micrograms (400 international units) of vitamin D with at least 1000 mg of calcium daily.
- Prescribe 20 micrograms (800 international units) of vitamin D with at least 1000 mg of calcium daily for elderly people who are housebound or living in a nursing home.
- Consider prescribing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to younger postmenopausal women to reduce the risk of fragility fractures and for the relief of menopausal symptoms. For further information on prescribing HRT, see the CKS topic on Menopause.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on drug treatment are based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal guidance Bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis [NICE, 2019], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020], as well as the Osteoporosis treatment summary in the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2021].
Specialist referral
- CKS recommends referring people for specialist management if oral bisphosphonates are not tolerated or are contraindicated. This recommendation is based on the availability, cost, and risks of adverse effects of alternatives (for example zoledronic acid, raloxifene, denosumab, and teriparatide) compared with oral bisphosphonates.
Calcium and vitamin D supplementation
- The recommendation to consider prescribing calcium and vitamin D instead of advising people to increase their dietary intake is based on:
- High-quality trials that indicate that calcium is required in addition to vitamin D to reduce fracture risk if intake of dietary calcium is inadequate.
- A lack of evidence to support increasing dietary calcium intake to reduce fracture risk — studies assessing the effects of calcium on fracture risk are of low quality and meta-analyses have reported considerable heterogeneity.
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
- HRT has been shown to reduce vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip fracture risk in postmenopausal women.
- The recommendation to consider prescribing HRT to younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is because in older women there is an unfavourable risk/benefit balance.
- Use is therefore generally restricted to women age 60 years or less at high risk of fracture who also have menopausal symptoms.
What lifestyle information and advice should I give?
- Advise the person to:
- Take regular exercise (tailored to the person) to improve muscle strength. Encourage:
- Walking, especially outdoors, as this will increase exposure to sunlight, increasing vitamin D production.
- Strength training (such as weight training) of different muscle groups (for example hip, wrist, and spine).
- A combination of exercise types, for example balance, flexibility, stretching, endurance, and progressive strengthening exercises.
- Eat a balanced diet as this may improve bone health.
- Stop smoking if applicable, as it is a risk factor for fragility fracture. For more information, see the CKS topic on Smoking cessation.
- Drink alcohol within recommended limits, as alcohol is a dose-dependent risk factor for fragility fracture. For more information, see the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking.
- Take regular exercise (tailored to the person) to improve muscle strength. Encourage:
- Provide the person with sources of information and support:
- The Royal Osteoporosis Society provides support and information to people affected by osteoporosis, and works to improve public understanding of osteoporosis.
- Healthtalkonline has a large collection of videos and transcripts of people's experiences of health and illness, including osteoporosis. There are also short articles for people with osteoporosis and the general public.
- NHS has a health encyclopaedia that has a printable article on Osteoporosis.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on lifestyle advice for a person with osteoporosis are based on expert opinion in the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021] and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
How should I follow up a person at risk of fragility fracture?
- After starting bone-sparing treatment:
- Check treatment tolerance after 12-16 weeks — ask about adverse effects, in particular:
- Upper gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as dyspepsia or reflux. These are common in the first month of treatment and often improve with continuing use. They are less likely if the recommended method of taking bisphosphonates is followed. For further information, see the section on What advice should I give someone taking bisphosphonates?.
- Symptoms of atypical fracture, including new onset hip, groin, or thigh pain. If this occurs, stop treatment and arrange an X-ray of the femur.
- Check adherence after 12 months of treatment.
- See the section on drug treatment for recommended alternative treatments if adverse effects are unacceptable.
- Check treatment tolerance after 12-16 weeks — ask about adverse effects, in particular:
- For people taking oral corticosteroids:
- Continue treatment with bisphosphonates and/or calcium and vitamin D until treatment with oral corticosteroids has stopped, then reassess the osteoporotic fragility fracture risk to determine the need for continuing treatment with a bisphosphonate and calcium and vitamin D.
- If long-term corticosteroid treatment is necessary bone protection should be maintained.
- Reassess fracture risk in people 12-18 months after starting medium or low dose corticosteroid treatment who have a fracture risk near to but below the intervention threshold.
- For all other people, reassess the need for continuing treatment with oral bisphosphonates after 5 years.
- For people who remain at high risk of an osteoporotic fragility fracture, continue treatment for at least 10 years. This includes people with any of the following risk factors:
- Aged 70 years or over at the start of bisphosphonate treatment.
- A previous hip or vertebral fracture.
- People who experience one or more fragility fractures during the first 5 years of treatment (if treatment is not changed).
- In other people, arrange a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan and consider:
- Continuing treatment for another 5 years if the T-score is -2.5 or lower, and then reassessing fracture risk.
- Pausing treatment for 1.5 to 3 years if the BMD T-score is greater than -2.5, and then reassessing fracture risk.
- For people who remain at high risk of an osteoporotic fragility fracture, continue treatment for at least 10 years. This includes people with any of the following risk factors:
- Reassess fracture risk at any time if:
- Re-fracture occurs.
- Clinical risk factors change.
- For people who sustain an osteoporotic fracture while on bone-sparing treatment, check adherence to treatment and exclude secondary causes for osteoporosis. If other underlying causes are excluded, consider referral to a specialist for advice on drug treatment.
- For people whose fracture risk was intermediate the last time they were assessed, reassess after a minimum of 2 years.
- If a new fracture occurs after bisphosphonate treatment is discontinued, reassess fracture risk and restart treatment.
- If bisphosphonate treatment is discontinued and no new fracture occurs, reassess fracture risk after 18 months for risedronate and ibandronate, 2 years for alendronate, and 3 years for zoledronate to inform whether treatment should be restarted.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on follow up for a person with osteoporosis are largely based on expert opinion in the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020].
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Calcium and colecalciferol (vitamin D3) preparations
What calcium and vitamin D preparations are available?
- There are a number of calcium and vitamin D preparations that provide a daily intake of at least 1 g of calcium and 400 units of vitamin D.
- For people who are allergic to peanuts or soya, preparations which do not contain soya (or soya bean) oil are available, such as Accrete D3® chewable, and Calfovit D3®.
- For a complete list of available calcium and vitamin D products and the recommended doses, see the British National Formulary (BNF).
What are the contraindications and cautions for calcium and vitamin D preparations?
- Do not prescribe calcium and vitamin D preparations to people with:
- Any disease or condition that results in hypercalcaemia and/or hypercalciuria (for example some malignancies, such as myeloma).
- Hyperparathyroidism.
- Renal stone disease.
- Hypervitaminosis D.
- Severe chronic kidney disease (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4 or 5).
- An allergy to peanuts or soya — soya oil-free products are available.
- Prescribe calcium and vitamin D preparations with caution to people with:
- Mild to moderate CKD (stages 2–3B) or mild hypercalciuria. Manufacturers recommend periodic checks of plasma calcium levels.
- In patients with severe renal failure (creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/minute) dosage adjustments may be necessary.
- A history of renal stone disease.
- Mild to moderate CKD (stages 2–3B) or mild hypercalciuria. Manufacturers recommend periodic checks of plasma calcium levels.
What are the adverse effects of calcium and vitamin D preparations?
- Adverse effects are uncommon and are generally related to the calcium content of the preparation. They include:
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects (such as constipation, flatulence, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhoea).
- Hypercalciuria (and rarely hypercalcaemia) — may occur with long term use of high doses of calcium and vitamin D preparations.
- Hypersensitivity reactions (such as angio-oedema and laryngeal oedema).
- Vitamin D supplements can cause occasional skin rashes.
What are the key drug interactions with calcium and vitamin D preparations?
- The key drug interactions with calcium and vitamin D preparations include:
- Oral bisphosphonates — reduced absorption of bisphosphonates. Advise the person to avoid administration at the same time, and to leave a gap of at least 30 minutes. For more information, see the section on What advice should I give someone taking bisphosphonates?.
- Strontium ranelate — reduced absorption of strontium ranelate. Strontium ranelate should be taken 2 hours before or after calcium supplements.
- Quinolones and tetracyclines — reduced absorption of quinolones and tetracyclines. Quinolones should be taken at least 2 hours before taking a calcium supplement. Tetracyclines should be taken at least 2–3 hours before taking a calcium supplement.
- Levothyroxine, iron, and zinc — reduced absorption. These drugs should be taken at least 2 hours before taking a calcium supplement.
- Digoxin — increased effects of digoxin. Some manufacturers of calcium supplements recommend monitoring an ECG and renal function during long-term calcium supplementation, to check for cardiac arrhythmias.
- Thiazide diuretics — reduced urinary calcium excretion. Due to the increased risk of hypercalcaemia:
- Monitor serum calcium levels regularly during concomitant use of thiazide diuretics with calcium and vitamin D preparations.
- Some manufacturers of calcium supplements recommend monitoring renal function during long-term calcium supplementation in people also taking a thiazide diuretic.
- Oral corticosteroids — reduced calcium absorption. It may be necessary to increase the dose of the calcium and vitamin D preparations.
- Phenytoin or barbiturates (long-term use) — there have been a few reports of decreased effects of vitamin D (due to an increase in its metabolism). Consider monitoring for vitamin D deficiency as a higher dose of vitamin D may be required.
[ABPI, 2021a; ABPI, 2021b; BNF, 2021; Micromedex, 2021; Preston, 2021]
Bisphosphonates
- Bisphosphonates are inhibitors of bone resorption.
- They increase bone mineral density by altering osteoclast activation and function.
- Alendronate and risedronate are generally the first-line treatments for osteoporosis in primary care.
What are the contraindications and cautions for bisphosphonates?
- Do not prescribe a bisphosphonate to:
- People with hypocalcaemia or other disturbances of bone and mineral metabolism (such as parathyroid dysfunction and hypovitaminosis D) — these should be treated before starting alendronate or risedronate.
- People with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) — the threshold varies between the different drugs:
- Alendronate is not recommended if creatinine clearance is less than 35 mL/minute.
- Risedronate is not recommended if creatinine clearance is less than 30 mL/minute.
- People who are unable to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes, or if there are any abnormalities of the oesophagus or other conditions which could delay oesophageal emptying (such as stricture or achalasia) — to reduce the risk of oesophageal reactions.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women — data on pregnancy and breastfeeding are scarce. Oral bisphosphonates are only licensed for use in postmenopausal women.
- Prescribe bisphosphonates with caution to:
- People with upper gastrointestinal (GI) problems, due to the risk of oesophageal reactions. These include:
- Dysphagia, oesophageal disease, gastritis, duodenitis, and peptic ulceration.
- A recent history (within the past year) of major GI disease (such as peptic ulcer, active GI bleeding, or surgery of the upper GI tract [other than pyloroplasty]).
- Barrett's oesophagus — consider the benefits and risks of treatment on an individual basis.
- People with upper gastrointestinal (GI) problems, due to the risk of oesophageal reactions. These include:
What are the adverse effects of bisphosphonates?
- Adverse effects of oral bisphosphonates include:
- Gastrointestinal (most common) — nausea, dyspepsia, mild gastritis, and abdominal pain. They are more likely to occur in the first month of treatment.
- Bone, joint, and/or muscle pain (common).
- Oesophageal reactions (uncommon) — oesophagitis, oesophageal ulcers, oesophageal strictures, and oesophageal erosions.
- Osteonecrosis of the jaw (rare) — an area of exposed or dead bone in the jaw that has lasted for more than 8 weeks.
- Osteonecrosis of the external auditory canal (very rare).
- Atypical stress fractures have been reported (mainly with alendronate). An increased risk cannot be excluded for other bisphosphonates.
What are the key drug interactions with bisphosphonates?
- There are few significant drug interactions, including:
- Calcium supplements and antacids — concurrent use may result in decreased absorption of the bisphosphonate. A minimum of 30 minutes should be left between taking a bisphosphonate and calcium supplements or antacids.
- Food and drink — reduced absorption of bisphosphonates may occur if they are taken with food and drinks (other than plain water). Coffee and orange juice reduce bioavailability of bisphosphonates by about 60%. A minimum of 30 minutes should be left between taking a bisphosphonate and food or drink.
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — some manufacturers of bisphosphonates advise caution if they are used in conjunction with bisphosphonates, due to the increased risk of gastrointestinal irritation.
What advice should I give a person taking a bisphosphonate?
- Oral bisphosphonates must only be taken on an empty stomach as their absorption is affected by food, drink, and other drugs — for more information, see the section on Drug interactions.
- Risedronate should be taken before breakfast; however, if this is not practical, it can be taken between meals or in the evening at the same time each day, with strict adherence to the following instructions (to ensure that it is taken on an empty stomach):
- Before breakfast — must be taken at least 30 minutes before the first food, other medicinal product, or drink (other than plain water) of the day.
- Between meals — should be taken at least 2 hours before or at least 2 hours after any food, other medicinal product, or drink (other than plain water).
- In the evening — should be taken at least 2 hours after any food, other medicinal product, or drink (other than plain water).
- Alendronate must be taken at least 30 minutes before the first food, other medicinal product, or drink (other than plain water) of the day.
- Risedronate should be taken before breakfast; however, if this is not practical, it can be taken between meals or in the evening at the same time each day, with strict adherence to the following instructions (to ensure that it is taken on an empty stomach):
- Also advise that:
- The tablet must be swallowed whole and taken with a glass of plain water (at least 200 mL); it must not be sucked or chewed because of a potential for oropharyngeal ulceration.
- It should be taken while in an upright position.
- The person must not lie down for at least 30 minutes after taking the medication.
- The medication must not be taken at bedtime or before getting up in the morning.
- Once weekly preparations should be taken on the same day each week.
- Give advice on missed doses:
- For once-daily preparations of alendronate, advise the person:
- To skip the missed dose for that day.
- To continue on the next day as usual.
- Not to take a double dose to make up for the missed dose.
- For once-daily preparations of risedronate, advise the person:
- Risedronate can be taken before breakfast, between meals, or in the evening as described above.
- For once-weekly preparations of alendronate or risedronate, advise the person:
- To take the missed tablet on the day that it is remembered.
- To continue taking one tablet once a week, on the day the tablet is normally taken.
- That two tablets should not be taken on the same day.
- For once-daily preparations of alendronate, advise the person:
- Advise the person to be aware of possible adverse effects of bisphosphonates, including:
- Upper gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as dyspepsia or reflux — these are common in the first month of treatment and often improve with continued use.
- Symptoms of atypical fracture, including new onset hip, groin, or thigh pain.
- Symptoms of osteonecrosis of the jaw, including jaw pain, swelling, and redness.
- Advise the person to have a dental check up before starting bone-sparing treatment. All patients with cancer and patients with poor dental status should have a dental check-up (and any necessary remedial work should be performed) before bisphosphonate treatment, or as soon as possible after starting treatment.
- Advise the person that after starting bone-sparing treatment, they should:
- Maintain good oral hygiene.
- Attend routine dental check ups.
- Tell their dentist that they are taking bone-sparing medication.
- Report any symptoms of osteonecrosis of the jaw to their dentist.
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is based largely on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture [NICE, 2017a], the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [NOGG, 2021], and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures [SIGN, 2020]. The rationale for primary care management strategies is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation sections. CKS has not summarized the evidence for secondary care investigations and management as they are beyond the scope of this topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of osteoporosis.
Search dates
January 2016 - May 2021
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp osteoporosis/, exp osteoporosis, postmenopausal/, osteoporosis.tw., exp fractures, bone/, exp osteoporotic fractures/, exp hip fractures/, fragility fractures.tw.
- combined with bisphosphonate$ and/or calcium and vitamin D.ti,ab.
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- ABPI (2020a) SPC for Fosamax Once Weekly 70mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2020b) SPC for Risedronate sodium 30 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2021a) SPC for Accrete D3 film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2021b) SPC for Calfovit D3 1200 mg/ 800 I.U. powder for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2020) Osteoporosis. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
- BNF (2021) British National Formulary. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- BNF (2023) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Compston, J. (2010)
Osteoporosis .In: Warrell, D.A., Cox, T.M. and Firth, J.D.(Eds.) Oxford textbook of medicine. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4103-4122. - Johansen, A., Harding, K. and Evans, R. (2000) Trauma in elderly people: what proportion of fractures are a consequence of bone fragility? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 29(3), 215-221.
- IBM Micromedex® (2021) Micromedex®. IBM Corporation. https://www.micromedexsolutions.com
- NICE (2012) Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk (full guideline). National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2017a) Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2017b) QS 149: Osteoporosis. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2018) Raloxifene for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2019) Technology appraisal guidance TA464: Bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NOGG (2021) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Guideline Group UK. https://www.nogg.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Preston, C.L. (2021) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
- SIGN (2020) SIGN 142: Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. https://www.sign.ac.uk [Free Full-text]