This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Infections and infestations Skin and nail

Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic)

Last revised in March 2026

Staphylococcal whitlow is a closed-space infection of the distal finger pulp.

Whitlow (staphylococcal and herpetic): Summary

  • Staphylococcal whitlow (also known as a felon) is a closed-space infection of the distal finger pulp.
    • It presents with a rapid onset of very severe, throbbing pain, with redness and swelling of the distal pulp of the fingertip. There is usually a history of a penetrating injury or untreated paronychia. Fluctuance and pointing of an abscess may be present.
  • Herpetic whitlow is a herpes simplex infection that typically appears on the distal phalanx of the fingers.
    • It often presents with an abrupt onset of oedema, redness, and localized severe tenderness of the infected finger. The pulp space is soft, not tensely swollen, and vesicles are present. There may be a history of current or recent herpetic lesions in the mouth or genitals, or a history of fever or malaise preceding the onset of symptoms.
  • Conditions that may present in a similar way to whitlow include cellulitis, paronychia, osteomyelitis, and cancer (for example, melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma).
  • Swabs may be useful in some cases, but are not always required.
  • For the management of tense or fluctuant staphylococcal whitlows, same-day incision and drainage should be considered.
  • For staphylococcal whitlows that do not require incision and drainage, treatment includes:
    • Giving advice on elevating the finger as much as possible, applying moist heat 3–4 times a day to hasten drainage of pus, and taking paracetamol or ibuprofen for pain relief.
    • Considering antibiotic treatment with flucloxacillin, or, if the person is allergic to penicillin, erythromycin or clarithromycin.
    • Seeking specialist advice if the person is known to have methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal aureus (MRSA) infection.
  • For treatment of a herpetic whitlow:
    • Incision and drainage is not recommended.
    • An antiviral drug such as aciclovir should be considered if the person presents within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms.
    • The person should be advised to avoid touching the affected finger, to cover it with a dressing, and to take paracetamol or ibuprofen as required for pain relief.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 1 month onwards.

This CKS topic covers the management of staphylococcal and herpetic whitlow in primary care.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of acute or chronic paronychia or fungal nail infections.

There are separate CKS topics on Paronychia - acute and Fungal nail infection.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

March 2026 — reviewed.  A literature search was conducted in February 2026 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to the topic and the evidence supporting the recommendations has been updated in line with the identified literature. Minor changes have been made to the prescribing information sections, aligning the information with the cited prescribing information references. There have been no major changes to the recommendations.

Previous changes

February 2025 — minor update. Duration of antibiotic treatment updated to 5–7 days.  

May 2024 — minor update. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contra-indicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

December 2023 — minor update. Update to drug interactions section for erythromycin to include information on interactions with lomitapide and corticosteroids, as per the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

November 2023 — minor update. Interactions section for flucloxacillin updated in line with updated manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.

March to April 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.

January 2021 — minor update. Contraindications and drug interactions for erythromycin have been updated in line with an MHRA drug safety update.

December 2016 — minor update. The dose of clarithromycin for people with severe renal impairment has been clarified, in line with the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics.

March to April 2016 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2016 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.

July 2015 — minor update. The prescribing information sections on erythromycin and clarithromycin have been clarified.

February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

July 2011 — minor update. More exact paracetamol dosing for children has been introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Prescriptions have been updated to reflect the revised dosing. Issued in July 2011.

May 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. Issued in June 2011.

April 2011 — minor update. Change to recommendation regarding need for additional contraception during or after a course of antibiotics - additional contraception is no longer required when using antibiotics that are not enzyme inducers with combined hormonal methods for durations of 3 weeks or less. Issued in June 2011

November 2010 to March 2011 — CKS topic revised. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. This CKS topic replaces the former topic on Boils and paronychia, which included the management of staphylococcal whitlow. There are now separate CKS topics on Boils, carbuncles, and staphylococcal carriage and Paronychia - acute. This topic now includes the management of herpetic whitlow.

July 2007 — Oilatum Plus discontinued. Minor change to the text made and prescriptions removed. Issued in August 2007.

December 2006 to March 2007 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.

October 2006 — minor update. Analgesia prescriptions updated because new doses of ibuprofen for children are recommended by the British National Formulary. Issued in October 2006.

October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.

September 2003 — written. Validated in December 2003 and issued in February 2004.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 February 2026.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 February 2026.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 February 2026.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 February 2026.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 February 2026.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 February 2026.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 February 2026.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 February 2026.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:
  • Make a diagnosis of whitlow (staphylococcal or herpetic).
  • Offer appropriate management of whitlow.
  • Refer people with staphylococcal whitlow for incision and drainage when appropriate.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is a whitlow?

  • Staphylococcal whitlow (also known as a felon) is a closed-space infection of the distal finger pulp.
  • Herpetic whitlow is a herpes simplex infection that typically appears on the distal phalanx of the fingers.              

[Rerucha, 2019; Lee, 2020; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]

What causes whitlow?

  • Whitlows occur when the infecting organism gains entry through a break in the skin (for example, a cut, needlestick, or splinter).
  • Staphylococcal whitlows are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, accounting for up to 80% of infections. Other organisms may be involved (for example, Gram-negative organisms and streptococci), but for the purposes of this CKS topic, the term staphylococcal whitlow will be used.
    • Infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus are increasing in frequency.
    • Polymicrobial infections are more common in people with diabetes, who work on farms, who are intravenous drug users, or following a bite injury.
  • Herpetic whitlows are usually caused by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and may occur when a person with oral herpes (as manifested by, for example, a cold sore or gingivostomatitis) sucks their fingers or thumb and spreads the virus through a cut in the skin, or by skin contact with a person with active symptoms (such as an open, fluid-filled blister).
    • Herpetic whitlow may also be caused by HSV-2 through autoinoculation from genital herpes.
    • Although HSV-1 is mainly localized around the oral region and HSV-2 around the genital region, it is possible to find HSV-1 genitally and HSV-2 orally. Therefore, finding HSV-2 in a whitlow does not always suggest contact with a genital lesion.
    • Viral reactivation following a previous HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection can produce symptoms, including at the fingertips.

[Patel, 2014; Sanders, 2014; Rerucha, 2019; Lee, 2020; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]

How common is it?

  • CKS did not find any information on the incidence and prevalence of whitlow in the UK.
  • The fingertip is the most common site of hand infections [Barger, 2024].
  • In the US:
    • Staphylococcal whitlow (and paronychia) account for approximately 15–20% of all hand infections [Barger, 2024].
    • The annual incidence of herpetic whitlow is estimated at 2.4 cases per 100,000 population per year [Iorizzo, 2024].

What are the risk factors?

  • Risk factors for staphylococcal whitlow include:
    • Injury to the fingertips — can provide an entry point for the infecting organism:
      • Fingertip blood glucose measurements (for example, in people with diabetes mellitus) have been implicated as a cause of staphylococcal whitlow.
      • People with diabetes are at a higher risk for staphylococcal whitlow and for polymicrobial fingertip infections.
    • Untreated acute paronychia — can spread and cause a staphylococcal whitlow.
  • Risk factors for herpetic whitlow include:
    • Exposure to infected oral secretions — healthcare workers, such as dentists and general practitioners, may come in contact with oral secretions of people infected with the herpes simplex virus.
    • Presence of other herpetic lesions, such as herpes labialis, herpetic gingivostomatitis, or genital herpes — infection can spread through autoinoculation.
  • Immunocompromised people (such as people with HIV infection or undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, including corticosteroids) are also at higher risk of whitlow infections, recurrence, and possibly systemic complications.

[McDonald, 2011; Lee, 2020; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]

What is the prognosis?

  • Staphylococcal whitlow — the prognosis is good if treatment is initiated early and appropriately.
  • Herpetic whitlow
    • Prognosis is good in uncomplicated cases.
    • Herpetic whitlow is generally self-limiting and resolves within 3 weeks. However, after the initial infection has cleared, the herpes virus remains dormant in the nerve ganglia of the fingers and may be reactivated by stress or illness, causing recurrences. Recurrence may occur in 20–50% of cases, but generally the clinical presentation is less severe.

[Rerucha, 2019; Bilolikar, 2020; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]

What are the complications?

  • Staphylococcal whitlow
    • Usually, if infection is recognized and treated early, staphylococcal whitlows resolve without sequelae. Complications are more likely in immunocompromised people, or if there has been a delay in treatment. They include:
      • Flexor tenosynovitis that can lead to flexor tendon rupture.
      • Tissue necrosis — the pulp of the fingertip is divided into many small compartments by vertical septa, and the increase in pressure (due to the presence of pus) in these small compartments may cause tissue necrosis.
      • Osteomyelitis involving the diaphysis of the distal phalanx.
      • Sinus tract formation.
      • Scarring of the finger pad.
      • Septic arthritis.
      • Systemic infection (note — this is very uncommon as the infection rarely extends beyond the distal interphalangeal joint).
  • Herpetic whitlow 
    • Complications are usually minimal (if the person is not immunocompromised) and include:
      • Ocular spread of the whitlow — patients are highly contagious during the early vesicular phase.
      • Scarring of the affected finger.
      • Increased sensitivity or numbness in between episodes of infection — reported in about 30–50% of people.
      • Lymphangitis and lymphadenitis, particularly with herpes simplex virus-2 infection.
      • Rarely, lymphoedema of the hand and forearm.
      • Disseminated disease in immunocompromised people.

[Patel, 2014; Foti, 2017; Rerucha, 2019; Lee, 2020; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]

Diagnosis

How should I differentiate between a staphylococcal and a herpetic whitlow?

  • Take a history, including asking about any preceding injury, onset of symptoms, and previous episodes.
    • In people with a staphylococcal whitlow, there is:
      • Usually, a history of a penetrating injury or untreated paronychia. 
      • Sometimes an initial tight feeling or a pricking pain.
      • A rapid onset of very severe, throbbing pain. 
      • Redness and swelling of the entire distal pulp of the fingertip. 
    • In people with a herpetic whitlow, there is often:
      • No history of injury.
      • Current or recent oral or genital herpetic lesions. 
      • A history of fever or malaise.
      • A prodrome of pain and paraesthesia of the affected finger lasting a few days. 
      • An abrupt onset of oedema, redness, and localized tenderness of the infected finger (severe pain which is usually out of proportion to physical findings).
      • A previous history — up to half of people with herpetic whitlow will experience recurrent infections. 
  • Examine the affected finger, looking for evidence of an abscess suggesting staphylococcal whitlow, or vesicles suggesting herpetic infection.
    • Wear protective gloves if there are active symptoms suggestive of herpetic whitlow (such as an open, fluid-filled blister).
    • See Table 1 for examination findings of staphylococcal and herpetic whitlow.

Table 1. Examination findings.

 
Staphylococcal whitlowHerpetic whitlow
The thumb and index finger are most commonly affected.Any part of the end of the finger (not just the tip) may be affected, and more than one finger at a time may be involved (most commonly the thumb and index finger).
There may be evidence of penetrating trauma, or a paronychia may be present.There is no evidence of injury.
There is redness, tense swelling, and oedema of the fingertip, usually not extending beyond the distal interphalangeal joint. Fluctuance (the fingertip feels 'boggy' on palpation) may be present.The affected finger is often very tender and oedematous. However, unlike staphylococcal whitlow, the pulp space is soft, not tensely swollen.
No vesicles are present, but pointing of an abscess may be present.Vesicles are present. Fluid within the vesicles is usually clear, but may appear cloudy or bloody.
Occasionally, spontaneous drainage of the abscess or sinus formation occurs.Vesicles may become purulent and break to form ulcers, which become crusted.
Systemic symptoms are uncommon.The person may have systemic symptoms such as fever and malaise, and also epitrochlear, lymphangitis, or axillary/inguinal lymphadenopathy.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the diagnosis of staphylococcal and herpetic whitlow are based on expert opinion in review articles [McDonald, 2011; Rigopoulos, 2012; Sanders, 2014; Barabas, 2015; Rerucha, 2019; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024], a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020], and chapters within dermatology textbooks [Craft, 2008; de Berker, 2010].

What else might it be?

  • The differential diagnosis of staphylococcal whitlow includes:
    • Herpetic whitlow.
    • Cellulitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute.
    • Paronychia. For more information, see the CKS topic on Paronychia - acute.
    • Underlying osteomyelitis.
    • A finger-tip injury, such as a subungual haematoma from blunt or crush injuries, avulsion of the nail root, or fracture of the terminal phalanx.
    • Psoriasis — can cause nail pitting and oil spots with purple skin plaques on extensor surfaces. For more information, see the CKS topic on Psoriasis.
    • Gout. For more information, see the CKS topic on Gout.
  • The differential diagnosis of herpetic whitlow includes:
    • Staphylococcal whitlow.
    • Cellulitis. For more information, see the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute.
    • Paronychia. For more information, see the CKS topic on Paronychia - acute.
    • Skin cancer (for example, malignant melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma). For more information, see the CKS topics on Melanoma and pigmented lesions and Skin cancers - recognition and referral.
    • Pompholyx eczema.
    • Infective endocarditis with Osler's nodes, which are painful, swollen, purplish nodules in the pulp of the fingers.
    • Ecthyma contagiosum (Orf) — a viral (parapoxvirus) infection occurring most commonly in people with contact with sheep or goats. Suggested by a painful wheal of 2–3 cm diameter on the fingertip, with a clear exudate. Fever and malaise may be noted.
    • Hand, foot, and mouth disease — early localised presentations can appear similar to herpetic whitlow, with vesicular or papulovesicular eruptions. For more information, see the CKS topic on Hand, foot, and mouth disease.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the differential diagnosis of staphylococcal and herpetic whitlow are based on expert opinion in review articles  [Rerucha, 2019; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024].

Management

Scenario: Staphylococcal whitlow

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage a person with staphylococcal whitlow?

  • Urgently admit the person to hospital if there are systemic features (for example, fever, tachycardia, or signs of shock), or associated lymphadenopathy or ascending lymphangitis.
  • Consider arranging same-day incision and drainage for people with a whitlow that is tense (even when a frank abscess has not developed) or fluctuant (the lesion feels 'boggy', and the overlying skin has a shiny appearance). 
    • The decision on whether to arrange same-day incision and drainage will depend on clinical judgement, taking into account the rapidity and degree of spread; any underlying comorbidities, such as conditions causing immunosuppression; and whether the person (or their carer) is able to follow instructions reliably regarding monitoring for complications.
    • Incision and drainage may be performed in primary care if the expertise and facilities are available. Otherwise refer to a surgical unit or emergency department, according to local protocols.
  • If incision and drainage are not indicated:
    • Consider prescribing oral antibiotics. 
      • Flucloxacillin is recommended first line. 
      • Erythromycin or clarithromycin are alternatives if the person has a true allergy to penicillin. Prescribe erythromycin to women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
    • For more information, see Prescribing information.
    • Seek specialist advice if the person is already known to have meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection or a swab sample grows MRSA.
  • Consider taking a swab from the contents of the whitlow if:
    • The whitlow is recurrent.
    • The person is immunosuppressed or at increased risk of infection.
    • The whitlow has not responded to treatment within 2–3 days.
    • The person has a history of MRSA infection or contact with MRSA. For more information, see the CKS topic on MRSA in primary care.
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis.
  • Consider referral for an X-ray if there is a history of injury and the possibility of a radio-opaque foreign body. Osteomyelitis can occur as a rare complication of staphylococcal whitlow; sinus tract formation may be associated with osteomyelitis and requires x-ray investigation.
  • Consider the need for tetanus prophylaxis.
  • Advise the person to:
    • Keep the finger elevated as much as possible.
    • Apply moist heat three to four times a day to alleviate pain and hasten draining of the pus.
    • Take paracetamol or ibuprofen as required for pain relief. For more information, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
    • Reduce the risk of recurrence by avoiding , such as injuries to the fingertips.
    • Seek medical advice if:
      • Swelling and pain become worse, or the whitlow becomes fluctuant (incision and drainage may be necessary).
      • They become systemically unwell (admission for intravenous antibiotics may be necessary).
      • The whitlow recurs (a swab for bacterial culture may be necessary).

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the management of staphylococcal whitlow are based on guidance in the British National Formulary [BNF, 2026], expert opinion in review articles [Clark, 2003; McDonald, 2011; Rigopoulos, 2012; Patel, 2014; Barabas, 2015; Rerucha, 2019; Barger, 2024], a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020].

Arranging urgent admission to hospital
  • This recommendation is based on the expert opinion of previous reviewers of this CKS topic, and also what CKS considers to be good clinical practice. The presence of lymphadenopathy or ascending lymphangitis in the setting of staphylococcal whitlow may be indicative of a spreading infection, which carries a risk of systemic infection and is an indication for intravenous antibiotics.
    • It should be noted that systemic infection following staphylococcal whitlow is very uncommon as the infection is generally confined within the septal compartments of the digital pulp and rarely extends beyond the distal interphalangeal joint [Rerucha, 2019; Barger, 2024].
Same-day incision and drainage
  • This recommendation is largely based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice. Expert opinion states that: 
    • Incision and drainage are recommended, particularly if an abscess is present, to prevent serious complications such as osteomyelitis, skin necrosis, and flexor tenosynovitis [Rigopoulos, 2012; Patel, 2014; Rerucha, 2019; Barger, 2024].
    • Drainage procedures have the potential for damage to neurovascular bundles and scar complications [Barger, 2024]. CKS therefore recommends that drainage of staphylococcal whitlow should be undertaken by a person experienced in the procedure.
Oral antibiotics for people with staphylococcal whitlow
  • The recommendation to consider antibiotic treatment for early staphylococcal whitlow is based on expert opinion in review articles [McDonald, 2011; Barabas, 2015; Rerucha, 2019; Barger, 2024] and a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020].
    • There is minimal evidence on the optimal management of staphylococcal whitlow, and it may be unclear whether medical management will suffice [Lee, 2020; Barger, 2024].
    • Expert opinion is that antibiotic treatment should only be considered if there is no abscess present [Rerucha, 2019; Lee, 2020], with some experts advocating surgical management if the skin of the affected distal phalanx is tense, regardless of whether or not an abscess is apparent [Barger, 2024].
Choice of antibiotics
  • The recommendations on the choice of antibiotics are extrapolated from recommendations on the antibiotic treatment of cellulitis [BNF, 2026].
    • Generally, narrow-spectrum antibacterials are preferred to broad-spectrum antibacterials [BNF, 2026].
    • Flucloxacillin is a narrow spectrum antibiotic active against Gram-positive organisms, including staphylococci and beta-haemolytic streptococci [EMC, 2025a], and is recommended as a first-line treatment option [BNF, 2026].
    • Erythromycin and clarithromycin are recommended as alternatives to flucloxacillin in people who have a true penicillin allergy, or in where flucloxacillin is unsuitable [BNF, 2026]. They are macrolide antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity against most sensitive Gram-positive cocci (including staphylococci and streptococci) [EMC, 2024; EMC, 2025b].
    • Erythromycin is the preferred macrolide antibiotic for pregnant and breastfeeding women as there is more experience with its use than with clarithromycin and most studies do not suggest an association with erythromycin use in pregnancy and adverse effects on the fetus [UKTIS, 2026].
    • Only small amounts of erythromycin are present in breastmilk and it is not known to be harmful [BNF, 2026].
Self-care advice
  • Self-care recommendations reflect expert opinion in review articles [McDonald, 2011; Rerucha, 2019], a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020], and what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
    • The aim of elevation of the finger and the use of warm soaks is to relieve discomfort, localize the infection, and promote drainage. However, the evidence that warm soaking is efficacious in the treatment of staphylococcal whitlow is weak [Lee, 2020].
    • To reduce the risk of complications, CKS pragmatically recommends that the person should be advised to seek medical advice if symptoms significantly worsens.

Scenario: Herpetic whitlow

From age 1 month onwards.

How should I manage a person with herpetic whitlow?

  • Wear protective gloves when touching a person with active symptoms of herpes, such as an open, fluid-filled blister.
  • Consider prescribing an antiviral drug if the person presents soon after the onset of symptoms (for example, within 48 hours). Aciclovir is recommended first line. For more information, see Prescribing information.
    • Antiviral drugs can be used to treat recurrent episodes if they are initiated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms.
  • Incision and drainage of a herpetic lesion are not recommended.
  • Consider taking a swab for:
    • Virological culture if the diagnosis is uncertain, the whitlow does not resolve with treatment or is recurrent, or the person is immunocompromised.
    • Bacterial culture if secondary bacterial infection is suspected.
  • Advise the person (where appropriate) to:
    • Take paracetamol or ibuprofen as required for pain relief. For more information, see the CKS topics on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain and NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
    • Avoid touching the infected area.
    • Ensure that the infected finger is covered with a clean, dry dressing to prevent transmission.
    • Avoid touching other parts of their body with the affected finger, especially the eyes. They should avoid wearing contact lenses (instead, wear glasses) until the infection has healed.
    • Discourage affected children from sucking their thumbs.
  • Offer written information. Patient information on herpetic whitlow is available from the NHS.
  • Inform the person that recurrence is common, but the initial infection is usually the most severe.
    • Offer HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) testing if the lesion is particularly extensive. For more information, see the CKS topic on HIV infection and AIDS.
  • Where appropriate, manage the underlying cause of the herpetic whitlow. For more information, see the CKS topics on Herpes simplex - genital and Herpes simplex - oral.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the management of herpetic whitlow are based on guidance in the British National Formulary [BNF, 2026], from expert opinion in review articles [Clark, 2003; McDonald, 2011; Sanders, 2014; Rerucha, 2019; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024], and a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020].

Antiviral drugs
  • This recommendation is based on guidance from the British National Formulary [BNF, 2026] and expert opinion in review articles [Rerucha, 2019; Iorizzo, 2024].
  • Treatment within the first 48 hours of symptom onset with antiviral medications, such as aciclovir, may shorten the course of the condition [Rerucha, 2019; Iorizzo, 2024].
  • Aciclovir is licensed for the treatment of non-genital herpes simplex [EMC, 2025c]. There is extensive experience with its use, and it is inexpensive compared with other oral antiviral drugs [BNF, 2026].
  • Although topical antiviral treatments are widely promoted, this route of administration will not reach the site of reactivation and does not influence the host immune response. Expert opinion in a review article is that topical treatments will not result in a reduction of symptom duration [Iorizzo, 2024].
Incision and drainage
  • This information is based on expert opinion in review articles [Rerucha, 2019; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024]and a chapter within a textbook on musculoskeletal infections [Lee, 2020].
  • Herpetic whitlow is self-limiting and usually resolves in 2–3 weeks. Incision and drainage are unnecessary, as they may cause viraemia and lead to secondary bacterial infection [DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024].rrent cases
  • This information is based on expert opinion in review articles [Clark, 2003; McDonald, 2011; Rerucha, 2019].
  • The herpes virus remains dormant in the nerve cells of the fingers and may be reactivated by stress or illness [McDonald, 2011].
  • The recommendation to offer HIV testing if the lesion is extensive is based on the expert opinion of previous reviewers of this CKS topic and what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Aciclovir

What dose of aciclovir should I prescribe?

  • For adults and children from 2 years of age — prescribe 200 mg five times daily (at approximately 4-hourly intervals during the day, omitting the nighttime dose) for 5 days.
  • For children 1 month to 23 months — prescribe 100 mg five times daily (at approximately 4-hourly intervals during the day, omitting the nighttime dose) for 5 days.
  • For immunocompromised adults and children, the dose should be doubled:
    • Adults and children from 2 years of age — prescribe 400 mg five times daily for 5 days.
    • Children 1 month to 23 months — prescribe 200 mg five times daily for 5 days.

[EMC, 2025c; BNF, 2026; BNFC, 2026]

What are the contraindications and cautions for aciclovir?

  • Do not prescribe aciclovir to a person with a known allergy to aciclovir or valaciclovir.
  • Prescribe aciclovir with caution in a person who: 
    • Is elderly.
    • Has renal impairment — advise the person to maintain adequate hydration. For herpes simplex infection, use the normal oral dose twice daily (every 12 hours) if the person's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2.

[EMC, 2025c; BNF, 2026; BNFC, 2026]

What are the adverse effects of aciclovir?

  • Aciclovir is generally well tolerated. 
  • However, it may cause gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. Headache, dizziness, and skin rashes (including photosensitivity and urticaria) have also been commonly reported.

[EMC, 2025c; BNF, 2026; BNFC, 2026]

What are the drug interactions with aciclovir?

Clinically relevant drug interactions with aciclovir include:

  • Aminophylline and theophylline — levels of these drugs are increased if used concurrently with aciclovir. Measurement of plasma concentrations and dose adjustment where necessary are therefore recommended.
  • Nephrotoxic drugs — Use with other nephrotoxic drugs increases the risk of renal impairment. Examples include, but are not limited to, colistimethate, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tacrolimus,  and voclosporin.
  • Live herpes-zoster vaccine — vaccine efficacy may be affected. Avoid live herpes-zoster vaccines until at least 48 hours after stopping aciclovir. If possible, avoid aciclovir for 2 weeks after live herpes-zoster vaccines.

[EMC, 2025c; BNF, 2026; Preston, 2026]

Clarithromycin

What dose of clarithromycin should I prescribe?

  • Adults: 250 mg to 500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 11 years with body weight:
      • Less than 8 kg: 7.5 mg per kg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 8–11 kg: 62.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 12–19 kg: 125 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 20–29 kg: 187.5 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
      • 30–40 kg: 250 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.
    • 12 years and over:  250 mg to 500 mg twice daily for 5–7 days.

[EMC, 2024; BNF, 2026]

What are the contraindications and cautions for clarithromycin?

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
    • Known hypersensitivity to clarithromycin or other macrolide antibiotics.
    • A history of QT prolongation or ventricular arrhythmia, including Torsade de Pointes.
    • Hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia.
    • Severe hepatic failure.
  • Clarithromycin is also contraindicated for people taking certain drugs.
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution in people with:
    • Coronary artery disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, or bradycardia (less than 50 beats per minute) — increased risk of QT prolongation.
    • Other conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation, such as electrolyte disturbances and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval  — macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of Torsades de Pointes arrhythmia. 
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver. Hepatic dysfunction, including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice) has been rarely reported with clarithromycin.
    • Use half the normal dose in severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) for a maximum duration of 14 days.
      • Avoid Xetinin XL® (clarithromycin 500 mg modified release once daily tablets) in people with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73  m2, and use half the normal dose of modified release tablets in people with eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate weakness symptoms of people with myasthenia gravis.
    • Concurrent conditions treated with drugs metabolised by CYP3A enzymes, particularly where the drug has a narrow safety margin.
      • Examples include, but are not limited to, alprazolam, cilostazol, ciclosporin, disopyramide, ibrutinib, methadone, methylprednisolone, omeprazole, atypical antipsychotics, quinidine, rifabutin, sildenafil, sirolimus, tacrolimus, triazolam and vinblastine.

[EMC, 2024; BNF, 2026; EMC, 2026]

What are the adverse effects of clarithromycin?

  • Clarithromycin is generally well tolerated. 
  • The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal — such as nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and diarrhoea.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with clarithromycin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridiodes difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Less common adverse effects include muscle complaints (spasms, stiffness and myalgia), rash and hepatoxicity.
  • Very rarely, QT prolongation, ventricular tachycardia, and Torsade de Pointes arrhythmia have been reported.

[EMC, 2024; BNF, 2026]

What are the important drug interactions with clarithromycin?

  • Drug interactions with clarithromycin include:
    • Pimozide — do not prescribe with clarithromycin as concurrent use may result in QT prolongation, cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and Torsade de Pointes.
    • Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine — do not prescribe with clarithromycin as concurrent use may result in acute ergot toxicity. 
    • Colchicine — avoid concomitant administration.
    • Carbamazepine — monitor carbamazepine levels within 3–5 days of starting clarithromycin, and adjust dose accordingly. Clarithromycin can increase carbamazepine levels, causing carbamazepine toxicity (may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Phenytoin and valproate — Clarithromycin can increase phenytoin and valproate levels.
    • Digoxin — elevated digoxin serum concentrations have been observed in people receiving clarithromycin and digoxin concomitantly, with some displaying clinical signs of digoxin toxicity.
    • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
    • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
    • Lomitapide — concurrent use with clarithromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
    • Midazolam — concomitant treatment is contraindicated as this can result in elevated levels of midazolam.
    • Other drugs that prolong the QT interval — if possible, avoid giving clarithromycin to a person who is already taking a drug that can potentially prolong the QT interval. These include, but are not limited to, astemizole, cisapride, domperidone and terfenadine.
    • Ranolazine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated as clarithromycin is predicted to markedly increase ranolazine levels.
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy.
      • For simvastatin — do not prescribe clarithromycin to a person taking simvastatin. Consider temporarily stopping simvastatin during short-term treatment with clarithromycin. 
      • For atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin if possible. Consider temporarily stopping atorvastatin during short-term treatment with clarithromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (10 mg), and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • For pravastatin — prescribe clarithromycin with caution and advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • Other statins — clinically significant interaction with clarithromycin is not expected for rosuvastatin and fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Ticagrelor — concomitant treatment is contraindicated as clarithromycin is predicted to markedly increase ticagrelor levels.
    • Warfarin — increase monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. Clarithromycin may enhance the effect of warfarin. 
    • Zidovudine — concurrent use can decrease steady-state zidovudine concentrations.
    • Oral hypoglycaemic drugs and insulin — the concurrent use of clarithromycin and antidiabetic drugs (such as sulphonylureas and/or insulin) can result in significant hypoglycaemia.
      • Monitor blood glucose levels more regularly and adjust the antidiabetic drug (and/or insulin) dose accordingly. 
    • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — due to an increased risk of hypotension, caution is advised with the concurrent use of clarithromycin and CCBs metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem).
    • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, short-acting beta-2 agonists) — hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
    • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of clarithromycin.
      • However, women should be advised about the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment.
    • Other drugs metabolised by CYP3A enzymes — particularly where the drug has a narrow safety margin.
      • Examples include, but are not limited to, alprazolam, cilostazol, ciclosporin, disopyramide, ibrutinib, methadone, methylprednisolone, omeprazole, atypical antipsychotics, quinidine, rifabutin, sildenafil, sirolimus, tacrolimus, triazolam and vinblastine.

[CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2024; BNF, 2026; Preston, 2026]

Erythromycin

What dose of erythromycin should I prescribe?

  • Adults: 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1–23 months: 125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–7 years: 250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 8–17 years: 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2026]

What are the contraindications and cautions for erythromycin?

  • Do not prescribe erythromycin to people with:
    • Porphyria or a known hypersensitivity to erythromycin.
    • A history of QT interval prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia.
    • Conditions that predispose to QT interval prolongation such as electrolyte disturbances and people taking drugs that prolong the QT interval.
  • Erythromycin is also contraindicated for people taking certain drugs.
  • Prescribe erythromycin with caution in people with:
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — erythromycin is principally excreted by the liver. 
    • Renal impairment — some manufacturers advise dose reduction in severe renal impairment.
    • Myasthenia gravis — macrolide antibiotics may aggravate weakness symptoms of people with myasthenia gravis.

[EMC, 2025b; BNF, 2026]

What are the adverse effects of erythromycin?

  • Gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea are common in people taking erythromycin.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with erythromycin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridiodes difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Hepatic dysfunction, including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice), has been rarely reported with this drug.

[EMC, 2025b; BNF, 2026]

What are the important drug interactions with erythromycin?

  • Drug interactions with erythromycin include:
    • Tolterodine, mizolastine, amisulpride, astemizole, terfenadine, domperidone, cisapride, ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, and pimozide — concurrent administration with erythromycin is contraindicated.
    • Cimetidine — monitor concurrent use closely as a dose reduction of erythromycin may be necessary. Cimetidine may inhibit the metabolism of erythromycin, leading to an increased plasma concentration.
    • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — due to an increased risk of hypotension, caution is advised with the concurrent use of erythromycin and CCBs metabolized by CYP3A4 (such as verapamil).
    • Carbamazepine — monitor carbamazepine levels within 3–5 days of starting erythromycin and adjust the dose accordingly. Erythromycin can increase carbamazepine levels, causing carbamazepine toxicity (which may present as nausea and vomiting, ataxia, and drowsiness).
    • Colchicine — avoid concurrent use if possible. Colchicine toxicity has been reported following concomitant use with erythromycin.
    • Corticosteroids — levels of corticosteroids may be increased. Monitor for corticosteroid adverse effects (such as moon face, weight gain, hyperglycaemia), and adjust the corticosteroid dose or stop the macrolide as appropriate.
    • Drugs that prolong the QT interval — if possible, avoid giving erythromycin to a person who is already taking a drug that can potentially prolong the QT interval.
    • Ivabradine — levels of ivarbradine may be increased when used concurrently with erythromycin and is contraindicated, and rare cases of serious, potentially fatal, cardiovascular events including cardiac arrest, torsade de pointes and other ventricular arrhythmias have been observed.
    • Lomitapide — concurrent use with erythromycin increases transaminase levels and is contraindicated.
    • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy.
      • For simvastatin — do not prescribe erythromycin to a person taking simvastatin. Consider temporarily stopping simvastatin during short-term treatment with erythromycin. 
      • For atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with erythromycin if possible. Consider temporarily stopping atorvastatin during short-term treatment with erythromycin. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (10 mg), and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
      • For pravastatin — prescribe erythromycin with caution and advise the person to seek medical advice if they experience symptoms of myopathy (for example muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness).
      • Other statins — clinically significant interaction with erythromycin is not expected for rosuvastatin and fluvastatin. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. 
    • Terfenadine — concurrent use with erythromycin may affect terfenadine metabolism.
    • Theophylline — consider using clarithromycin (in preference to erythromycin) as clarithromycin normally causes only modest (clinically unimportant) increases in theophylline levels.
      • Concurrent use of erythromycin with high doses of theophylline may be associated with an increase in serum theophylline levels and potential theophylline toxicity (which may present as palpitations, nausea, tremor, and headache). If this is suspected, reduce the dose of theophylline. 
      • Concurrent treatment may also result in a significant decrease in erythromycin serum concentrations, leading to sub-therapeutic concentrations of erythromycin.
    • Triazolobenzodiazepines and related benzodiazepines — such as alprazolam, triazolam and midazolam, concurrent use with erythromycin may decrease clearance and increase the pharmacological effect of these drugs.
    • Rivaroxaban — erythromycin may increase levels of rivaroxaban, increasing the risk of bleeding. 
    • Warfarin — monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) when both drugs are used (particularly in elderly people), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. Erythromycin may enhance the effect of warfarin; this is an established but unpredictable interaction.
    • Zopiclone — monitor concurrent use. Erythromycin has been reported to decrease the clearance of zopiclone and this may lead to an increase in the effects of zopiclone. 
    • Oral hormonal contraception — additional contraceptive precautions are not required during or after courses of erythromycin.
      • However, women should be advised about the importance of correct contraceptive practice if they experience vomiting or diarrhoea. For further information, see the CKS topic on Contraception - assessment.

[CoSRH, 2022; EMC, 2025b; BNF, 2026; Preston, 2026]

Flucloxacillin

What dose of flucloxacillin should I prescribe?

  • Adults: 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
  • Children aged:
    • 1 month to 1 year: 62.5 mg to 125 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 2–9 years: 125 mg to 250 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.
    • 10–17 years: 250 mg to 500 mg four times daily for 5–7 days.

[BNF, 2026]

What are the contraindications and cautions for flucloxacillin?

  • Do not prescribe flucloxacillin to people with:
    • A true penicillin allergy — gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (for example nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin.
    • History of flucloxacillin-associated jaundice or hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe flucloxacillin with caution to people with: 
    • Hepatic dysfunction (not flucloxacillin-related), especially if they are 50 years of age or older, or have a serious underlying medical condition.
    • Severe renal impairment — reduce the dose if the person's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2.

[EMC, 2025a; BNF, 2026]

What are the adverse effects of flucloxacillin?

  • Diarrhoea is a common adverse effect of flucloxacillin.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with flucloxacillin.
    • Pseudomembranous colitis is an acute, exudative colitis caused by Clostridiodes difficile, a Gram-positive toxin-releasing bacillus. It often follows antibiotic treatment. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Cholestatic jaundice and hepatitis may occur (very rarely) up to several weeks after treatment with flucloxacillin has been stopped. Risk factors include treatment for more than 2 weeks and increasing age.
  • Uncommon adverse effects include arthralgia, leucopenia, rash, urticaria and purpura.

[EMC, 2025a; BNF, 2026]

What are the drug interactions with flucloxacillin?

  • Methotrexate — methotrexate clearance may be reduced, causing an increased risk of toxicity; however, serious interactions are uncommon. 
    • Standard routine monitoring will identify any decreases in elimination in people on high-dose regimens. For people on low-dose regimens, consult local or national guidelines/protocols for monitoring and management.
  • Coumarin and indanedione anticoagulants (warfarin, phenindione) — consider increased monitoring of international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the dose accordingly.
  • Posaconazole and voriconazole — concentrations of antifungal is greatly decreased. If concurrent use is unavoidable, monitor for decreased efficacy and consider increasing the dose of the azole (although this may not resolve the issue). 
  • Probenecid — concomitant administration may result in increased levels of flucloxacillin.
  • Live cholera vaccine — efficacy of the vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 14 days before to 10 days after receiving live cholera vaccine.
  • Live typhoid vaccine — immune response to vaccine may be reduced. Avoid flucloxacillin from 3 days before to 3 days after receiving live typhoid vaccine.
  • Paracetamol — caution is advised when flucloxacillin is used with paracetamol, as concurrent intake has been associated with high anion gap metabolic acidosis.

[EMC, 2025a; EMC, 2025d; Preston, 2026]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on guidance in the British National Formulary [BNF, 2026], and expert opinion in review articles [McDonald, 2011; Rigopoulos, 2012; Patel, 2014; Sanders, 2014; Barabas, 2015; Rerucha, 2019; DermNet, 2023; Barger, 2024; Iorizzo, 2024].

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of whitlow.

Search dates

March 2021 - February 2026

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • Herpesvirus 1, Human*
  • Herpesvirus 2, Human*
  • HSV1 or HSV 2.ti,ab.
  • Herpes simplex/therapy*
  • Soft tissue infections/diagnosis*
  • Soft tissue Infections/therapy*
  • Staphylococcal infections/
  • (Staphylococcal Whitlow) or (Herpetic Whitlow) or (Herpetic Paronychia).ti,ab.
  • Whitlow.tw, exp Staphylococcus aureus/, Staphylococcus aureus.ti,ab.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • Barabas, A. and Fleming, N.M. (2015) Hand infections. In: Trail, I.A. and Fleming, A.N.M. (Eds.) Disorders of the hand. Volume 1: hand injuries. London: Springer-Verlag, 415-436.
  • Barger, J. and Hoyer, R.W. (2024) Fingertip infections. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 55(2), 265-272. [Abstract]
  • Bilolikar, V.K., Seigerman, D.A. and Ilyas, A.M. (2020) Diagnosis and management of common hand infections. JBJS Reviews 8(4), e0188. [Abstract]
  • BNF (2026) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • BNFC (2026) British National Formulary for Children. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Clark, D.C. (2003) Common acute hand infections. American Family Physician 68(11), 2167-2176. [Abstract]
  • CoSRH (2022) CEU Drug interactions with hormonal contraception. College of Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://www.cosrh.org [Free Full-text]
  • Craft, N., Lee, P.K., Zipoli, M.T., et al. (2008) Superficial cutaneous infections and pyodermas. In: Wolff, K., Goldsmith, L.A., Katz, S.I., et al. (Eds.) Fitzpatrick's dermatology in general medicine. 7th edn. London: McGraw-Hill Medical, 1694-1709.
  • de Berker, D.A.R. and Baran, R. (2010) Disorders of nails. In: Burns, T., Breathnach, S., Cox, N. and Griffiths, C. (Eds.) Rook's textbook of dermatology. 8th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, 65.22-65.23.
  • DermNet (2023) Herpetic Whitlow. DermNet NZ. https://dermnetnz.org [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024) SPC for Clarithromycin 250 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2025a) SPC for Flucloxacillin 250 mg capsules, hard. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2025b) SPC for Erythromycin 250 mg Gastro-resistant Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2025c) SPC for Aciclovir 200mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2025d) SPC for Vibrio cholerae live attenuated. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2026) SPC for Xetinin XL 500 mg prolonged release tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Foti, C., Romita, P., Mascia, P., et al. (2017) Atypical herpetic whitlow: a diagnosis to consider. Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets 17(1), 3-4. [Abstract]
  • Iorizzo, M. and Pasch, M.C. (2024) Bacterial and viral infections of the nail unit: Tips for diagnosis and management. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation 43S(1), 101502. [Abstract]
  • Lee, G.E. and Isaacs, J. (2020) Acute paronychia and felon. In: Reznicek, J., Perdue J.P.W. and Bearman, G. (Eds.) Musculoskeletal infections: a clinical case book. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 131-143.
  • McDonald, L.S., Bavaro, M.F., Hofmeister, E.P. and Kroonen, L.T. (2011) Hand infections. Journal of Hand Surgery 36(8), 1403-1412. [Abstract]
  • Patel, D.B., Emmanuel, N.B. and Stevanovic, M.V. (2014) Hand infections: anatomy, types and spread of infection, imaging findings, and treatment options. Radiographics 34(7), 1968-1986. [Abstract]
  • Preston, C.L. (2026) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical press. https://www.medicinescomplete.com
  • Rerucha, C.M., Ewing, J.T., Oppenlander, K.E. and Cowan, W.C. (2019) Acute hand infections. American Family Physician 99(4), 228-236. [Abstract]
  • Rigopoulos, N., Dailiana, Z.H., Varitimidis, S. and Malizos, K.N. (2012) Closed-space hand infections: diagnostic and treatment considerations. Orthopedic Reviews 4(2), e19-87. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Sanders, J.E. and Garcia, S.E. (2014) Pediatric herpes simplex virus infections: an evidence-based approach to treatment. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice 11(1), 1-19. [Abstract]
  • UKTIS (2026) Use of macrolide antibiotics in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS). https://uktis.org [Free Full-text]
Change privacy settings