Palliative care
Palliative cancer care - pain
Last revised in April 2025
Cancer-related pain may be persistent or breakthrough (episodic), and influenced by physical, psychological, social and spiritual factors.
Palliative cancer care - pain: Summary
- Cancer-related pain may be persistent or breakthrough (episodic) and influenced by physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors. Breakthrough pain may be:
- Unpredictable (spontaneous).
- Predictable (incident) and related to movement or activity.
- The type of pain experienced depends on the underlying cause, and may be somatic, visceral, or neuropathic pain. It can be caused by direct effects of a tumour, cancer treatment, related to procedures such as dressing changes, or unrelated to the underlying cancer.
- When assessing pain for a person in palliative care:
- A validated structured pain assessment tool may be helpful.
- The impact on quality of life should be discussed.
- If appropriate, an examination should be performed — looking particularly for specific points of tenderness and signs of neurological deficit that may suggest spinal cord compression.
- Investigations may be necessary if a reversible condition is a possible cause of pain or clinical deterioration.
- Management of pain for a person in palliative care should involve:
- Taking into account whether there is a treatable underlying cause, the person's circumstances, wishes, comorbidities, and existing analgesia.
- Using the oral route of administration where possible.
- Prescribing analgesia for continuous pain on a regular basis, in addition to as-required analgesia.
- Consideration of a stepwise approach, using the World Health Organization analgesic ladder.
- Advising a dose of breakthrough analgesia 20–30 minutes before anticipated movement if incident pain occurs.
- Reviewing analgesia requirements regularly, stepping treatment up or down as necessary.
- The addition of a non-opioid adjuvant drug should be considered at any stage, for example:
- A tricyclic antidepressant or anticonvulsant for neuropathic pain.
- An antispasmodic for intestinal colic.
- A muscle relaxant for muscle spasm.
- A trial of dexamethasone for raised intracranial pressure.
- If prescribing a strong oral opioid drug:
- An anti-emetic should help to prevent nausea.
- A laxative should help to prevent constipation.
- If the oral route is not appropriate, options include switching to a subcutaneous morphine infusion.
- Specialist palliative care advice is needed if:
- There is doubt about how to manage pain.
- Pain is uncontrolled, for example, the pain is still at 50% or more of its starting level after 2 weeks.
- Adverse effects are uncontrolled.
- Spinal cord compression or spinal metastases are suspected as a cause of pain — immediate specialist advice from a metastatic spinal cord compression coordinator is advised, or alternatively the person's palliative care consultant or oncologist.
- An unfamiliar opioid or route of administration is being considered.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 16 years onwards.
This CKS topic covers the assessment of adults with cancer who are in pain and incorporates guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer [NICE, 2004] and Care of dying adults in the last days of life [NICE, 2015a].
This CKS topic does not cover the management of pain from non-malignant causes, including pain caused by the investigation or treatment of the cancer. This CKS topic also does not cover the use of complementary therapies in the management of cancer-related pain, although these therapies may have a role for some people with cancer who are in pain.
There are separate CKS topics on Palliative care - constipation, Palliative care - cough, Palliative care - dyspnoea, Palliative care - general issues, Palliative care - malignant skin ulcer, Palliative care - nausea and vomiting, Palliative care - oral, and Palliative care - secretions.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
April 2025 — minor update. QOF indicators removed in line with NHS England's 2025 Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Previous changes
March 2023 — minor update. Hypertonia added as a symptom of withdrawal, and undesirable effects added in line with manufacturers updated SPC for baclofen.
March 2021 — reviewed. Literature searches were conducted in February 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic.
September 2020 — minor update. Stable analgesic requirements were updated to highlight that fentanyl patches and buprenorphine patches are contraindicated in opioid-naive patients.
July 2015 to October 2016 — reviewed. Literature searches were conducted in September 2016 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. There have been structural changes to the topic and changes to the recommendations have been updated in line with NICE guidance Care of dying adults in the last days of life [NICE, 2015a].
April 2015 — minor update. Update to the text to reflect a new law on drugs and impaired driving.
July 2014 — two minor updates:
- Update to the text to include advice from the MHRA regarding the safe use and disposal of fentanyl patches following reports of accidental exposures that have led to life-threatening adverse effects.
- Update to the text on the use of metoclopramide in palliative care. Although the European Medicines Agency has restricted the use of metoclopramide this does not apply to unlicensed uses of metoclopramide (for example palliative care).
June 2014 — minor update. Update to the text to reflect the fact that tramadol has been reclassified to a Schedule 3 controlled drug.
January 2014 — minor update. Update to the text to correct a minor typographical error.
July 2013 — minor update. Update to the text to reflect advice from the MHRA regarding diclofenac.
June 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in May 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
February 2013 — minor update. The 2013 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.
March 2012 — minor update. The 2012/2013 QOF indicators have been added to this topic. Issued in April 2012.
July 2011 — minor update. Text updated to include information on novel fentanyl products for breakthrough pain based on recommendations from the North East Treatment Advisory Group. Issued in September 2011.
May 2011 — minor update. The 2011/2012 QOF indicators have been added to this topic. Issued in June 2011.
February 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics — no changes to clinical recommendations have been made.
September 2010 — minor update. The choice of drug treatment for neuropathic pain has been updated in line with the NICE clinical guideline, Neuropathic pain. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings. Issued in September 2010.
June 2010 to July 2010 — minor update. The advice on the management of breakthrough pain for people taking oral morphine has been updated. Issued in July 2010.
December 2008 to March 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There have been no major changes to the recommendations.
September 2008 — minor update to include advice from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regarding the safety of fentanyl patches. Issued in September 2008.
June 2007 — minor update. Gabapentin is now licensed up to a maximum dose of 3600 mg per day for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Issued in June 2007.
January 2006 — minor update. Prescriptions for diamorphine updated to reflect the change in handwriting requirements for controlled drug prescriptions. Issued in February 2006.
October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.
April 2005 — minor update to include new advice from the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) on the safety of COX-2 selective inhibitors. Issued in April 2005.
January 2004 — written. Validated in December 2004 and issued in February 2005.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 March 2021.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 March 2021.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 March 2021.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 March 2021.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 March 2021.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 March 2021.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 March 2021.
Changes in product availability
- Actimorph is licensed for treatment of severe pain only adequately managed with opioids. Tablet disperses rapidly in mouth and then swallowed. Alternatively, tablet may be placed in a spoon with addition of small quantity of water until sufficient dispersion to allow ingestion. See more here.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Make an assessment of the pain (for example, site, severity, type).
- Treat the pain in primary care.
- Seek advice when appropriate from palliative care or other specialist services.
- Achieve the best quality of life possible for the person and their family.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.
QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.
QIPP - Options for local implementation
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Review the appropriateness of NSAID prescribing widely and on a routine basis, especially in people who are at higher risk of both gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality (e.g. older patients).
- If initiating an NSAID is obligatory, use ibuprofen (1200 mg per day or less) or naproxen (1000 mg per day or less).
- Review patients currently prescribed NSAIDs. If continued use is necessary, consider changing to ibuprofen (1200 mg per day or less) or naproxen (1000 mg per day or less).
- Review and, where appropriate, revise prescribing of etoricoxib to ensure it is in line with MHRA advice and the NICE clinical guideline on osteoarthritis [CSM, 2005; NICE, 2008a].
- Co-prescribe a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with NSAIDs for people with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or low back pain (for people over 45 years) in accordance with NICE guidance [NICE, 2008a; NICE, 2009a; NICE, 2009b].
- Take account of drug interactions when co-prescribing NSAIDs with other medicines (see Summaries of Product Characteristics). For example, co-prescribing NSAIDs with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may pose particular risks to renal function; this combination should be especially carefully considered and regularly monitored if continued.
- Hypnotics
- Review and, where appropriate, revise prescribing of hypnotics to ensure that it is in line with national guidance.
NICE quality standards
NICE have defined Quality Standards relevant to end of life care for adults [NICE, 2013].
Background information
What is pain?
- Pain is a symptom, not a condition.
- It is a complex state that is influenced by multiple factors, including psychological, social, and spiritual [Cherny, 2015; Back, 2021]:
- Table 2 summarizes factors that affect pain sensation.
- For more information on psychological, social, and spiritual factors, see the CKS topic on Palliative care - general issues.
- Cancer-related pain may be persistent or breakthrough (episodic). Breakthrough pain is of moderate or severe intensity and of two main types [Twycross, 2016]:
- Unpredictable (spontaneous) pain — not related to movement or activity.
- Predictable (incident) pain — related to movement or activity (for example, swallowing or coughing).
- Pain that occurs towards the end of the duration of an action of an opioid (for example 8–10 hours after a 12-hour dose) is called 'end of dose failure' it is not breakthrough pain [Back, 2021].
Table 2. Factors contributing to the sensation of pain.
| Factors increasing pain sensation | Factors decreasing pain sensation |
|---|---|
| Anger | Acceptance |
| Boredom | Creative activity |
| Insomnia, fatigue | Sleep |
| Anxiety, fear, grieving | Relaxation, empathic support |
| Depression | Elevation of mood |
| Mental isolation and social abandonment | Companionship, understanding |
| Discomfort | Relief of other symptoms |
| Lack of understanding about condition | Explanation about condition |
Data from: [Twycross, 2016] | |
What are the origins of pain in people with cancer?
- The type of pain experienced depends on the underlying cause. Most types of cancer-related pain will be a combination of the following causes, in conjunction with an inflammatory element:
- Somatic pain — due to stimulation of nociceptors in the skin and deep musculoskeletal tissues (for example pain from bone metastases, post-surgical incision pain, myofascial or musculoskeletal pain).
- Visceral pain — due to stretching, compression, distension, or infiltration of thoracic or abdominal viscera (for example from liver metastases, pancreatic cancer, intestinal obstruction).
- Neuropathic pain — pain occurring in an area of altered sensation due to injury to the peripheral or central nervous system (for example from tumour compression, infiltration of peripheral nerves, nerve roots or the spinal cord, trauma from surgery, and radiotherapy).
- Pain can be caused by:
- Direct effects of the tumour (for example infiltration of pain-sensitive structures).
- Treatment associated with the cancer (for example surgery, chemotherapy, radiation treatment).
- Pain related to procedures (for example dressing changes, change of position).
- A condition not directly related to the cancer (for example infection, pre-existing osteoarthritis).
[Regnard, 2022; Cherny, 2015; Gordon-Williams, 2015; Twycross, 2016]
How common is pain in people with cancer?
- Pain prevalence ranges from 33% in patients after curative treatment, to 59% in patients on anticancer treatment, and to 70% in patients with metastatic, advanced, or terminal disease and pain will be difficult to control in 10% of this group [Fallon, 2018].
- Pain has a high prevalence earlier in disease in specific cancer types, such as 44% of people with pancreatic cancer and 40% of those with head and neck cancer [Fallon, 2018].
- Multiple pains are common. Of people with pain [Wessex Palliative Physicians, 2019]:
- One third have one pain.
- One third have two pains.
- One third have three or more pains.
Management
Scenario: Assessment of pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I approach pain assessment?
- Discuss pain with the person directly if possible. The person, if competent and able to communicate, is the most reliable source of information about their pain. If it is not possible to ask them (because of cognitive impairment or communication deficits, for example), the family or healthcare professionals may be able to help with the assessment, bearing in mind that family members may overestimate and healthcare professionals underestimate the person's pain.
- Assess each pain a person has with a view to establishing an underlying cause, bearing in mind that there may be more than one cause and more than one pain. Seek specialist advice if assessment is difficult because of complex or multiple pains.
- Assess pain regularly, particularly if it is not adequately controlled.
- Review the medical history and medical records to determine the known site and extent of the cancer. Pain occurring distant from the previously known sites of cancer may indicate either a non-malignant cause or secondary spread of the cancer.
- Assess the influence of psychological, social, and spiritual factors on the person's experience of pain.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on expert opinion in guidelines published by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Control of pain in adults with cancer: a national clinical guideline [SIGN, 2008] and expert opinion in a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022].
How should I assess pain severity?
- Use a validated structured pain assessment tool, for example:
- Numerical rating scale — mark on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) how strong the pain is.
- Visual analogue scale — mark on a 10-cm line (with 'no pain' at one end and 'worst possible pain' at the other end) how strong the pain is.
- The score can be correlated to the severity of the pain:
- Mild pain: less than 3 out of 10 on a visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale.
- Mild to moderate pain: 3–6 out of 10 on a visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale.
- Severe pain: more than 6 out of 10 on a visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale.
- Differentiate between the person's usual level of pain, breakthrough pain, incident pain, and 'end of dose' failure of regular around-the-clock analgesia.
- End of dose failure usually occurs at the same time each day, usually just before the next dose is due.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on published expert opinion.
- To assess the response to treatment, it is useful to have some measure of the severity of pain before and after an intervention. Pain rating scales may be useful to assess the course of a person's pain, assess the effects of treatment, and reassure the person that their pain is being thoroughly addressed:
- A guideline on the control of pain in adults with cancer from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommends that people with cancer pain should have treatment outcomes monitored regularly using visual analogue scales, numerical rating scales, or verbal rating scales [SIGN, 2008]. This recommendation was based on expert opinion and non-analytic studies.
- CKS has adopted the classifications of severity of pain given (on the basis of expert opinion) in the SIGN guideline [SIGN, 2008]. However it is acknowledged that these definitions are subjective, and clinical judgement is therefore needed.
How should I assess the characteristics of the pain?
- Enquire about:
- Site and number of pains.
- Intensity/severity of pains.
- Radiation.
- Quality and type of pain.
- Timing (onset, duration, breakthrough, or incident pain).
- Exacerbating and relieving factors.
- Sensory disturbance.
- Power/functional loss and effect on activities of daily living.
- Effect on sleep.
- Associated symptoms and signs.
- The person's thoughts about the likely cause.
- Presence of depression and/or anxiety.
- Person's understanding and beliefs about the origin and progress of the pain.
- Pain that presents insidiously and progressively worsens suggests a malignant cause for the pain.
- Acute onset of pain may be of a non-cancer related cause (for example pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, perforation of a viscus). Cancer-related causes include pathological fracture, bleeding into hepatic metastases, or spinal cord compression.
- The quality of the pain and exacerbating features can also suggest a cause.
- For more information on features of pain that may suggest a mechanism, see Table 3.
Table 3. Features suggesting a mechanism of the pain.
| Character of the pain | Likely cause |
|---|---|
| Burning, shooting, tingling, jagging, altered sensation (especially hypersensitivity and allodynia), dermatomal distribution | Nerve pain (due to nerve compression, for example) |
| Headache associated with nausea, worse on lying down, especially in the mornings | Increased intracranial pressure |
| Pain worse on weight bearing or stressing/pressure on the bone | Bone pain (due to metastasis or fracture, for example) |
| Crampy, intermittent pain occurring regularly every few minutes. Occasionally pain is continuous | Intestinal colic (due to bowel obstruction, for example) |
| Hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant tenderness | Liver pain |
| Sudden onset pain occurring spontaneously or with movement. Can be severe but may be very short lived | Episodic or incident pain |
| Pain in a particular muscle, tenderness over trigger point(s) | Muscle spasm |
Data from: [Regnard, 2022; Back, 2021] | |
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on a palliative care guideline Palliative Care Adult Network Guidelines [Back, 2021] and expert opinion in a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022].
What elements of physical examination might assist in assessing palliative cancer pain?
- Examine the patient to try and determine the cause of pain, for example tender hepatomegaly or abnormal sensation.
- Look particularly for specific points of tenderness (which may indicate the site of origin of the pain) and signs of neurological deficit, which may suggest spinal cord compression.
- A full examination is rarely appropriate in people who are very unwell and in the last stages of life.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on expert opinion in palliative care guidelines [NHS Scotland, 2021] and the Oxford textbook of palliative care [Cherny, 2015].
How should I investigate pain in palliative care?
- Consider investigations that are appropriate to the person's condition.
- Limit investigations to those likely to significantly affect treatment decisions.
- If the person is near the end of life, investigations are rarely indicated. They may be performed if a reversible condition may be the cause of their deterioration, or if the person has acute (potentially reversible) deterioration.
- If investigations are appropriate, ensure that the person's pain is adequately treated before they undergo diagnostic procedures. For more information on how to prescribe for incident pain (such as pain on movement), see Management of breakthrough pain.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on the Oxford textbook of palliative care [Cherny, 2015].
Scenario: Acute severe pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage acute severe pain?
- Immediately relieve pain using a subcutaneous or slow intravenous dose of a strong opioid.
- The dose depends on the person's comorbidities and their existing analgesia:
- If the person is opioid naive, consider a subcutaneous or slow intravenous dose of 5 mg of morphine (2.5 mg if the person is elderly or frail).
- If the person is already taking a regular opioid, calculate the 4-hourly dose by taking the total dose given over the previous 24 hours (including doses required for breakthrough pain but excluding those for incident pain) and dividing it by six, and then give the equivalent subcutaneous dose of morphine:
- The subcutaneous dose of morphine is approximately half of the 4-hourly oral morphine dose.
- For more detailed information on converting oral morphine to a subcutaneous dose, see the conversion table in Switching from morphine to another strong opioid.
- Following this, seek immediate specialist palliative care advice regarding further management and try to determine the cause of the pain.
- Always take into account the person's circumstances and wishes:
- If the person wishes to stay at home and is near the end of life, then control of symptoms should be attempted in this setting; if this is not possible, transfer to a hospice or hospital may be needed.
Basis for recommendation
There is no expert consensus on how to manage a person with acute, severe pain. Opinion varies widely with respect to the preferred drug, route of administration, and doses used. CKS has offered a simple pragmatic approach for immediate management based on opinion from expert reviewers.
- These recommendations are consistent with published expert opinion from a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022] and guidelines published by NHS Scotland [NHS Scotland, 2021].
Scenario: Managing pain - non-emergency
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I treat persistent pain in a non-emergency situation?
- Prescribe analgesia for continuous pain on a regular basis, in addition to as-required analgesia.
- Consider a stepwise approach, using the World Health Organization analgesic ladder. Start at the appropriate point of the analgesic ladder, moving up the ladder when the maximum dose at each step is reached until the person is comfortable. The steps are:
- Step 1: non-opioid analgesic such as paracetamol and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (mild pain).
- Step 2: weak opioid such as codeine, dihydrocodeine, or tramadol (controlled drug), with or without a non-opioid analgesic (mild-to-moderate pain).
- Step 3: strong opioid such as morphine, with or without a non-opioid analgesic (severe pain).
- Step 2 is not always necessary and can be omitted if this is considered clinically appropriate.
- At any stage, consider the addition of a non-opioid adjuvant drug (any drug that has a primary indication other than for pain management but is analgesic in some painful conditions: for example a tricyclic antidepressant for neuropathic pain).
- Review regularly (consider a telephone call if appropriate), step treatment up or down as necessary, and stop unnecessary medication that has not worked.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendation to use analgesia at regular intervals for continuous pain is based on the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021] and the Palliative Care Formulary [Wilcock, 2020].
- This stepwise approach is based on the principles of the WHO analgesic ladder (based on the consensus of international expert opinion and clinical practice) that aims to match treatment to the intensity of the pain [WHO, 1996; WHO, 2003].
- The correlation of mild, moderate, and severe pain to the steps of the WHO ladder is used in a guideline from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN, 2008]:
- Non-opioid analgesic drugs: trial data of non-opioid (paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) analgesia in people with cancer-related pain are limited, but evidence supports the general analgesic effect of these drugs, and guidelines and experts recommend their use. Non-opioid analgesic drugs may have synergistic effects when used with opioids, allowing better pain relief to be achieved at lower doses of opioid and therefore reducing opioid adverse effects [SIGN, 2008].
- Weak opioid drugs:
- There is little evidence that weak opioids are more effective than the drugs (paracetamol and/or an NSAID) used at step 1 [Regnard, 2022]. However weak evidence suggests that using an opioid in combination with paracetamol, with or without an NSAID, may reduce the dose of opioid required and therefore reduce adverse effects [SIGN, 2008].
- The Palliative Care Formulary states that there is no pharmacological need for step 2 of the analgesic ladder. Low doses of oral morphine can be used instead [Wilcock, 2020]. This approach may be more effective in relieving pain, but there is more potential for adverse effects.
- Strong opioid drugs: the success of the WHO approach to pain management has been attributed to using strong oral opioids for severe pain [Fallon, 2018].
Which non-opioid drug should I prescribe?
- Paracetamol and/or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) are recommended first line.
- Paracetamol 1 g 4 times daily or reduced to 500 mg 4 times daily if the person has a poor nutritional status or low body weight (less than 50 kg), hepatic impairment, chronic alcohol abuse, or may be on chemotherapy.
- If an NSAID is appropriate and not contraindicated:
- The oral route is preferred, but if this is not possible, consider alternative routes (such as rectal).
- Consider prescribing a proton pump inhibitor with an NSAID. For more information on minimizing the risks associated with NSAID treatment, see the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
- Non-opioid adjuvant drugs may also be useful for some people with specific pain types:
Basis for recommendation
- Take into account an individual’s risk factors and use the lowest dose possible to achieve pain control.
- There is no clear evidence that one nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is more effective than another. However they do appear to be effective in the treatment of inflammation-associated pain, and in particular bone pain. It has been suggested that NSAIDs can reduce opioid requirements for some people.
- If gastrointestinal safety is a concern and an NSAID is thought to be necessary, CKS recommends a standard NSAID plus a proton pump inhibitor. For more information, see the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
- These recommendations are based on expert palliative care guidelines [Back, 2021].
Which weak opioid drug should I prescribe?
- Codeine, dihydrocodeine, or tramadol are recommended:
- If flexibility of dosing and titration of analgesic effect are required, prescribe the weak opioid separately to paracetamol.
- If compliance is likely to be a problem and analgesic requirements are stable, consider prescribing a product combining 500 mg of paracetamol with 30 mg of codeine.
- To prevent constipation, prescribe a stimulant laxative (such as senna or bisacodyl) and a softening laxative (such as docusate).
- A laxative with both properties (for example co-danthramer or co-danthrusate) is also an option.
- Avoid dantron-containing laxatives in people who are incontinent as these drugs can cause a chemical burn (reddening) of the perianal area.
- Dantron can also colour the urine red, which can cause alarm to the person and carers.
- For further information on managing constipation see the CKS topic on Palliative Care - constipation.
Basis for recommendation
Codeine, dihydrocodeine, and tramadol
- The recommendation to use codeine, dihydrocodeine, or tramadol is based on expert opinion in palliative care guidelines [NHS Scotland, 2021]. In terms of efficacy, there is little to choose between weak opioids [Wilcock, 2020].
Laxatives
- The recommendation to use a laxative is based on expert opinion in the Palliative Care Formulary [Wilcock, 2020].
Which strong opioid drug should I prescribe?
Use the oral route of administration where possible.
- Initially offer oral sustained-release morphine or oral immediate-release morphine (depending on the person's preference) with rescue doses of oral immediate-release morphine for breakthrough pain.
- For detailed advice on how to initiate morphine and titrate the dose, see Initiation of oral morphine and Titration of oral morphine.
- Seek specialist advice if the person has moderate to severe renal or hepatic impairment.
- If the person's compliance with oral morphine is good, but pain is inadequately controlled:
- Review the cause of the pain.
- Consider seeking specialist advice and using a non-opioid adjuvant drug to treat a specific type of pain. For more information, see:
- If compliance with oral morphine is good, but the person cannot tolerate an adequate dose, consider using an alternative oral opioid — seek specialist advice.
- If the oral route is not appropriate (such as the person has nausea and vomiting, cannot swallow, or has poor compliance with oral analgesia):
- Unstable analgesic requirements — consider switching to a subcutaneous morphine infusion and seek specialist advice where needed. For more information, see Switching from morphine to another strong opioid.
- Stable analgesic requirements — consider switching to a transdermal patch if the person has previously tolerated opioids. Seek specialist advice.
- Note: buprenorphine patches and fentanyl patches are contraindicated in people who are opioid naive.
- They are also contraindicated for acute pain and in severe uncontrolled pain requiring rapid dose titration, due to their long elimination half-life.
- They also should be used with caution in people with cachexia as absorption may be unpredictable, so conversion charts may not accurately translate for these people.
- If fentanyl patches are prescribed, advise the person that accidental exposure to fentanyl can cause life-threatening harm. This can occur if the patch is swallowed or accidentally transferred to another person.
- To reduce this risk, advise the person:
- To choose the patch application site carefully.
- To check the adhesion of the patch once applied, especially the edges.
- To fold the used patch as soon as it is removed so that the adhesive side of the patch sticks firmly to itself, and dispose of the folded patch safely.
- If a patch is accidentally transferred to another person, remove it immediately and seek medical advice.
- If a patch is swallowed, seek medical help immediately.
- When prescribing a strong opioid:
- Prescribe an anti-emetic such as metoclopramide for gastric stasis, otherwise low-dose haloperidol (nausea usually settles within the first week of treatment):
- If the person has experienced nausea with opioids, give regularly for the first week to prevent opioid-induced nausea and vomiting and then reassess, or
- If the person experiences nausea with morphine but has not experienced nausea with opioids, prescribe for use on an as-required basis for 1 week.
- For more information on managing nausea see the CKS topic Palliative care - nausea and vomiting.
- To prevent constipation, prescribe a stimulant laxative such as senna or bisacodyl and a softening laxative such as docusate.
- Constipation is common, usually persistent, and worse with increased doses of opioids. People who take strong opioids should always be prescribed a laxative.
- A laxative with both properties (for example co-danthramer or co-danthrusate) is also an option.
- Avoid dantron-containing laxatives in people who are incontinent as these drugs can cause a chemical burn (reddening) of the perianal area.
- Dantron can also colour the urine red and alarm the person.
- For more information on managing constipation see the CKS topic Palliative Care - constipation.
- Prescribe an anti-emetic such as metoclopramide for gastric stasis, otherwise low-dose haloperidol (nausea usually settles within the first week of treatment):
- Seek specialist palliative care advice if:
- There is doubt about how to manage a person's pain.
- Adverse effects limit treatment and cannot be adequately managed.
- An unfamiliar opioid or route of administration is being considered.
- The pain is still at 50% or more of its starting level after 2 weeks.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on guidance published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Opioids in palliative care: safe and effective prescribing of strong opioids for pain in palliative care of adults [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016], the Scottish palliative care guidelines [NHS Scotland, 2021], and published expert opinion in a textbook Introducing palliative care [Twycross, 2016].
How should I manage breakthrough pain?
- Give adequate instructions (written if possible) on how to control breakthrough pain. Inform other healthcare team members, including out-of-hours staff, as appropriate.
- The person should take breakthrough analgesia before the pain gets severe, as it may take 30–60 minutes for the analgesia to reach full effect.
- When deciding whether more than one breakthrough dose is needed, consider the time required for medication to take effect and its potential for adverse effects before administering another dose.
- In a person taking regular analgesia, breakthrough pain indicates a need for reassessment of the analgesic dosage and the underlying cause of pain. For more information on how to increase the dose of oral morphine, see Initiation of oral morphine and Titration of oral morphine.
- If the person is taking regular paracetamol and/or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), consider:
- Treating with an additional dose of the regular analgesic as long as it does not exceed the maximum licensed dose, or
- Adding in a weak opioid on an as-required or regular basis.
- If the person is taking regular paracetamol and/or an NSAID plus a weak opioid, consider:
- Treating with an additional dose of the regular analgesic as long as it does not exceed the maximum licensed dose, or
- Switching to a strong opioid.
- For people taking oral morphine:
- If the person is using immediate-release or modified-release morphine regularly — treat with immediate-release oral morphine (tablets or liquid), at a dose of one sixth to one tenth of the total daily oral morphine dose, to be taken when required and repeated no more than 2-hourly or a maximum of 6 doses in 24 hours.
- The breakthrough dose may need to be individually titrated to between 5% and 20% of the regular daily dose.
- If the person is in severe pain and needs another dose sooner than 2 hourly or 3 or more doses have been given within 4 hours with limited benefit, seek specialist advice. If more than 6 doses are required within 24 hours seek advice or review.
- The onset of action of immediate-release morphine is about 20–30 minutes.
- Revise the dose of the breakthrough dose if the regular dose has been altered.
- Seek specialist advice if pain is not controlled despite optimizing drug treatment.
- If the person is using immediate-release or modified-release morphine regularly — treat with immediate-release oral morphine (tablets or liquid), at a dose of one sixth to one tenth of the total daily oral morphine dose, to be taken when required and repeated no more than 2-hourly or a maximum of 6 doses in 24 hours.
- If the person is receiving a subcutaneous infusion of morphine:
- Treat with a subcutaneous bolus dose at one sixth to one tenth of the 24-hour infusion dose, when required, and repeated no more than 2-hourly. If the person is in severe pain and needs another dose sooner, seek specialist advice.
- Oramorph® is an alternative for people who can manage liquids but are on an infusion because they cannot swallow tablets. It allows the person and their family greater control over managing episodes of breakthrough pain without having to wait for a healthcare professional to attend to give a breakthrough subcutaneous dose.
- Specialist advice should be sought in this situation to check the oral route is appropriate and to clarify the dose of Oramorph® because the doses suggested by experts vary.
- If using other strong opioid analgesics, seek specialist advice.
- If the person's background pain is satisfactorily controlled but they experience incident pain (pain on movement or particular events, such as micturition, wound dressing, bed care, travel):
- Do not keep increasing the 24-hour dose of opioid.
- Give a breakthrough dose of an immediate-release opioid approximately 30 minutes before the precipitating factor occurs. In some situations, transmucosal fentanyl can be useful for this purpose, but this should be used only on the advice of a specialist.
- Do not include the breakthrough doses administered for incident pain when reassessing maintenance opioid analgesia requirements.
Basis for recommendation
Different strategies are used to reduce the impact of breakthrough pain, and expert opinion varies. This recommendation is based on guidelines published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Opioids in palliative care: safe and effective prescribing of strong opioids for pain in palliative care of adults [NICE, 2012], expert opinion in palliative care pain management guidelines [NHS Scotland, 2021], the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021], the Palliative Care Formulary [Wilcock, 2020], and expert opinion in a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022].
What advice should I give regarding strong opioids?
- Ask the person if they have any specific concerns regarding treatment with a strong opioid, for example addiction, tolerance, or adverse effects.
- Reassure the person that:
- Strong opioids are not addictive when they are used to treat pain.
- Tolerance may occur but this should not affect how their pain is managed.
- Strong opioids are being prescribed because of the level of pain they are experiencing and not because they are near to the end of life.
- Provide verbal and written information on:
- Why a strong opioid is being prescribed and how it should be taken.
- The indications for strong opioids, how effective they are, how quickly they take to work, and how long pain relief should last.
- For more information, see the prescribing information on Strong opioids.
- What adverse effects may occur (including signs of toxicity) and how these are usually managed.
- Safe storage of strong opioids.
- Strong opioids should be kept in a safe place out of the reach of children and stored in the original container.
- Any unused strong opioids should be returned to a pharmacy.
- Who to contact out of hours (especially during the titration phase), when they will be followed up, and how frequently their treatment will be reviewed.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on guidance published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Opioids in palliative care: safe and effective prescribing of strong opioids for pain in palliative care of adults [National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016].
- The NICE guideline development group considered patient concerns had a significant impact on whether or not a patient would take a strong opioid and therefore recommended that the person's concerns should be explored when offering treatment with a strong opioid.
- The NICE guideline development group recommended a minimum level of information should be offered to people starting strong opioids as this can be a time of great anxiety. This was based on the clinical experience of the NICE guideline development group.
Scenario: Managing neuropathic pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage neuropathic pain?
- Consider whether there is a treatable underlying cause (for example nerve compression from bone metastases or soft-tissue disease) and seek specialist advice regarding further treatment of the cause (for example surgical stabilization for bone metastases or radiotherapy for soft-tissue disease).
- If pain is purely neuropathic and reversible conditions (for example vitamin B12 deficiency) have been excluded:
- Consider offering a tricyclic antidepressant (such as amitriptyline) or pregabalin (or gabapentin if there is a local decision to prefer gabapentin over pregabalin).
- Titrate the dosage according to response and tolerability.
- For further information on contraindications, cautions, managing adverse effects, and second-line options if amitriptyline or pregabalin are not effective, see the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
- If pain is of mixed origin, use standard analgesics in addition to a tricyclic antidepressant or pregabalin (or gabapentin) if pain is not adequately controlled with standard analgesia alone. For more information on standard analgesics, see Scenario: Managing pain - non-emergency.
- Seek specialist advice or consider referral if pain persists.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendation to manage any treatable causes of neuropathic pain is based on a textbook on symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022], a textbook of symptom management in advanced cancer [Twycross, 2016], the Palliative Care Formulary [Wilcock, 2020], and a palliative care guideline [NHS Scotland, 2021].
- If pain is purely neuropathic and reversible conditions (for example vitamin B12 deficiency) have been excluded, CKS recommends that neuropathic pain should be managed in accordance with guidance issued by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on drug treatment of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [NICE, 2010]. For further information, see the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
- CKS recommends seeking specialist advice for people with persistent neuropathic pain because various additional treatments may be considered for use by specialists, including cognitive behaviour therapy, ketamine, methadone, nerve blocks, or spinal analgesia.
Scenario: Managing intracranial pressure pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage pain from raised intracranial pressure?
- Consider whether a treatable underlying cause is present.
- Discuss with an oncologist regarding the need for radiotherapy.
- Use standard analgesics in a stepwise approach. For more information, see Scenario: Managing pain - non-emergency.
- Also consider a trial of dexamethasone at a dose of 8–16 mg daily (taken in the morning), titrated down to the lowest dose that controls symptoms:
- If the volume of tablets or injection is difficult to manage in a single dose, it is acceptable to split the dose, in which case it should be given at 8 am and 12 pm (noon).
- Have a low threshold for considering gastroprotection with a proton pump inhibitor.
- Response to dexamethasone should be assessed after 3 days, but extensive cerebral oedema may take 2–3 weeks to resolve.
- If there has been no response, discontinue dexamethasone immediately.
- If there has been a benefit, review frequently and reduce to the lowest dose that controls symptoms (for example reduce by 2 mg every fifth day).
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on expert opinion in a palliative care guideline [NHS Scotland, 2021], expert opinion in a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022], and the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021].
- The recommendation to have a low threshold for giving a proton pump inhibitor is based on expert opinion from reviewers of this CKS topic, who suggested that most people with increased intracranial pressure will have risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding as well as corticosteroid treatment.
Scenario: Managing colic
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage intestinal colic?
- Consider whether there is a treatable underlying cause:
- It may be possible to treat certain causes of colicky pain (for example bowel colic due to constipation) in primary care — see the CKS topic on Palliative cancer care - constipation.
- However some causes (for example bowel obstruction) need specialist management and possibly surgical intervention, provided the person is fit enough for surgery and wants to be admitted.
- If symptomatic management is appropriate, consider hyoscine butylbromide (an antispasmodic), 20 mg immediately by subcutaneous injection, then 60–100 mg/24 hours via syringe driver continuous infusion.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on expert opinion in a palliative care guideline [NHS Scotland, 2021], expert opinion published in a textbook A guide to symptom relief in palliative care [Regnard, 2022], and the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021].
Scenario: Managing bone pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage bone pain?
- Consider whether there is a treatable underlying cause and discuss with an oncologist if this is suspected (for example regarding radiotherapy or bisphosphonates for bone metastases).
- Seek urgent advice from an orthopaedic surgeon if there is evidence or suspicion of an actual or imminent fracture.
- For symptomatic relief:
- Apply hot or cold packs.
- Use standard analgesia in a stepwise approach (see Scenario: Managing pain - non-emergency).
- If incident pain occurs on movement, encourage the person to take a dose of their breakthrough analgesia 20–30 minutes before anticipated movement. See Management of breakthrough pain.
- If pain is difficult to manage, seek advice from a specialist (such as a palliative care specialist or an anaesthetist with an interest in chronic pain).
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on expert opinion in a palliative care guideline [NHS Scotland, 2021], and expert opinion in two textbooks on symptom management in advanced cancer [Regnard, 2022; Wilcock, 2020].
- CKS recommends seeking specialist advice if pain is difficult to manage because various additional treatments are available in secondary care, including radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or nerve blocks.
Scenario: Managing muscle spasm pain
From age 16 years onwards.
How should I manage muscle spasm?
- Consider whether there is a treatable underlying cause.
- Try simple measures (such as heat pad, massage, relaxation).
- Consider transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation over the trigger point if the pain is myofascial.
- If trigger points are multiple or the muscle spasm is widespread, consider a muscle relaxant — benzodiazepines (such as diazepam) or baclofen:
- Several different doses of diazepam have been suggested by experts. These range from 2–10 mg at night to 2–5 mg three times a day; the higher doses may be helpful if there is co-existing anxiety. The dose may need to be reduced depending on clinical response.
- The suggested dose of baclofen to treat muscle spasm is 5–10 mg three times a day. However baclofen should be titrated slowly, which may limit its usefulness in people requiring palliative care.
- The choice of drug will also depend on any other actions (for example benzodiazepines may be more appropriate for people with co-existing anxiety) and the potential for limiting adverse effects.
- If these measures are not effective, or there are only a few trigger points, consider referral. Other drugs or injection of trigger points with local anaesthetic may be considered in secondary care.
Basis for recommendation
The recommended drugs and doses are based on expert opinion in a textbook of symptom management in advanced cancer [Regnard, 2022], the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021], and expert opinion from reviewers of this CKS topic.
- There is no clear evidence that any muscle relaxant drug is superior to any other [Wilcock, 2020].
Scenario: Spinal cord compression
From age 16 years onwards.
When should I suspect spinal cord compression?
- Suspect spinal metastases if any of the following features are present:
- Pain in the middle (thoracic) or upper (cervical) spine.
- Progressive lower (lumbar) spinal pain.
- Severe unremitting lower spinal pain.
- Spinal pain aggravated by straining (for example when passing stool or when coughing or sneezing).
- Localized spinal tenderness.
- Nocturnal spinal pain preventing sleep.
- Suspect spinal cord compression if any of the following features are present:
- Neurological symptoms (including radicular pain, any limb weakness, difficulty in walking, sensory loss, or bladder or bowel dysfunction).
- Neurological signs of spinal cord or cauda equina compression.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline Metastatic spinal cord compression [NICE, 2008b].
How should I manage spinal cord compression?
- If spinal metastases are thought to be the cause of the pain, seek urgent (within 24 hours) specialist advice from a metastatic spinal cord compression coordinator if available, or alternatively the person's palliative care consultant or oncologist.
- If there are associated neurological features suggestive of spinal cord compression, seek immediate specialist advice.
- Unless contraindicated (including a significant suspicion of lymphoma), offer all people with metastatic spinal cord compression a loading dose of 16 mg of dexamethasone as soon as possible after assessment.
Basis for recommendation
This recommendation is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline Metastatic spinal cord compression [NICE, 2008b].
- High dose dexamethasone given immediately will reduce oedema and may delay the onset of spinal cord ischaemia [Regnard, 2022].
Scenario: End of life care
From age 16 years onwards.
End of life care
- It can often be difficult to be certain that a person is dying, but it is essential to recognize the signs of dying in order to appropriately care for people at the end of life. For more information see the CKS topic on Palliative care - general issues.
- An individualized care plan including the areas of symptom control and anticipatory prescribing should be created. For more information see the CKS topic on Palliative care - general issues.
- Follow the principles of pain management used at other times when caring for people in the last days of life, for example matching the medicine to the severity of pain and, when possible, using the dying person's preferences for how it is given. Consider non-pharmacological management of pain in a person in the last days of life.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Care of dying adults in the last days of life [NICE, 2015a].
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).
What issues should I consider before prescribing a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug?
- For detailed information on prescribing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, see the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues.
What issues should I consider before prescribing codeine, dihydrocodeine, and tramadol?
- For a detailed information on prescribing codeine, dihydrocodeine, and tramadol, see the CKS topic on Analgesia - mild-to-moderate pain.
Strong opioids
Initiation of oral morphine
- Initially prescribe either immediate-release or modified-release oral morphine:
- Immediate-release oral morphine has a rapid onset of action (about 20 minutes) but it requires administration every 4 hours to maintain a continuous analgesic effect. Consequently, it is difficult to cover pain throughout 24 hours, unless the person is being closely monitored.
- Immediate-release morphine is useful for titration if the person's pain is severe and rapid titration is required, usually on an inpatient basis. Oramorph® solution and Sevredol® tablets are both immediate-release morphine products.
- Modified-release morphine preparations have a slower onset of action (1–2 hours) and later peak levels (4 hours) than immediate-release preparations. Although they cannot be rapidly titrated for people in severe pain, in many people they provide continuous analgesia that is ideal for titration, especially for those at home.
- Immediate-release oral morphine has a rapid onset of action (about 20 minutes) but it requires administration every 4 hours to maintain a continuous analgesic effect. Consequently, it is difficult to cover pain throughout 24 hours, unless the person is being closely monitored.
- For people not currently taking an opioid or taking a weak opioid:
- If titrating with immediate-release morphine:
- In young and middle-aged people, start with morphine 5 mg every 4 hours plus as required (up to 2-hourly) for breakthrough pain.
- In elderly or frail people, start with morphine 2 mg every 4 hours plus as required (up to 2-hourly) for breakthrough pain. Use cautious dose titration in the elderly or frail, this can help to reduce initial drowsiness, confusion, and unsteadiness.
- If titrating with modified-release morphine
- In young and middle-aged people, start with modified-release morphine 10–15 mg every 12 hours plus breakthrough doses of immediate-release morphine as required (up to 2-hourly).
- Consider starting at a lower dose and titrating carefully if the person is elderly or frail.
- Once treatment has started review the person after 24 hours and recalculate the total morphine requirement and titrate the dose as required.
- For more information see Titration of oral morphine.
- If titrating with immediate-release morphine:
- For people previously on an alternative strong opioid:
- CKS recommends seeking specialist advice because of the differences in opinion regarding conversion ratios.
- Seek specialist palliative care advice for people with renal impairment, hepatic impairment, people with increased intracranial pressure, or people at risk of respiratory depression.
- For people with renal impairment, a lower or less frequent regular dose of morphine may be preferable, or a different opioid may be more appropriate.
[National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016; ABPI, 2020a; NHS Scotland, 2021]
Titration of oral morphine
- After 24 hours, recalculate the total morphine requirement: the new 24-hour dose is the total of all the doses given in the previous 24 hours.
- Care should be taken when calculating morphine requirements for people who are pain free at rest but have pain on movement. If all the analgesia for this incident pain is incorporated into the new morphine dose the person is likely to be excessively sedated at rest or possibly opioid toxic. CKS therefore recommends that incident pain doses are excluded when calculating the new 24-hour dose.
- Increasing the dose of morphine
- If the person takes two or more as-required doses in 24 hours, increase the regular dose of morphine every 2–3 days (using the as-required amount of morphine used as a guide) until there is adequate pain relief or adverse effects prevent further dose increases.
- In general, dose increases should be limited to no more than 30% of the total 24-hour morphine dose.
- Immediate-release morphine
- If the total 24-hour dose is 90 mg (6 × 10 mg regular doses + 3 × 10 mg as-required doses), the new 4-hourly dose would be 15 mg.
- Once the pain is controlled and a stable 24-hour requirement of morphine is established, the daily dose can be switched to a modified-release preparation in a single daily dose, or in two divided doses.
- Modified-release morphine
- For a 12-hourly modified-release preparation divide the total 24-hour dose of morphine by two. For example if the total 24-hour dose is 120 mg (2 × 40 mg regular modified-release doses + 4 × 10 mg as-required doses), the new 12-hourly modified-release dose would be 60 mg.
- For a 24-hourly modified-release preparation the dose is equivalent to the total 24-hour dose of morphine.
- Switching from immediate-release to modified-release morphine
- If switching from regular immediate-release to modified-release morphine, give the first dose of modified-release morphine within 4 hours after the last dose of immediate-release morphine (and discontinue the immediate-release preparation).
- If possible, keep the person on the same brand of modified-release morphine. This is because the pharmacokinetic profiles of modified-release products differ, and differences in appearance may be confusing for people.
- Continue to provide immediate-release morphine tablets or solution for as-required treatment of breakthrough pain.
[National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016; Wilcock, 2020; BNF, 2021; NHS Scotland, 2021]
Management of opioid adverse effects
- Exclude any underlying illness or other drugs (such as antipsychotics) that may mimic opioid-induced adverse effects (such as dehydration).
- Drowsiness is common at the start of treatment or after dose increases. Warn people to avoid activities (such as driving) in which drowsiness may be detrimental. Most people develop tolerance to drowsiness within a few days. Persistent sedation can usually be resolved by dose reduction.
- If the person drives, give advice about driving while taking opioids:
- You should not drive if you feel drowsy, dizzy, unable to concentrate or make decisions, or if you have blurred or double vision.
- It is now an offence to drive if you have more than a specified amount of opioid in your body whether your driving is impaired or not.
- It may be helpful to keep evidence with you while you are driving that you are taking an opioid in accordance with medical advice. Suitable evidence may include: your medication box with the pharmacy label on, the other half of your prescription with the list of medicines prescribed by your doctor, or the package insert if the medicine was bought over-the-counter.
- If the person drives, give advice about driving while taking opioids:
- Nausea and vomiting subside after the first few days in many people but can be an ongoing problem for others. An anti-emetic (for example metoclopramide if the problem is gastric stasis, or low-dose haloperidol) should be prescribed.
- For more information, see the CKS topic on Palliative care - nausea and vomiting.
- Constipation — tolerance does not develop, but constipation can usually be treated. To prevent constipation, prescribe a stimulant laxative (such as senna or bisacodyl) and a softening laxative (such as docusate):
- A laxative with both properties (for example co-danthramer or co-danthrusate) is also an option. Some people taking dantron-containing laxatives may experience a chemical burn (reddening) of the perianal area; these agents are therefore unsuitable for incontinent people. Dantron can also colour the urine red and alarm the person.
- For more information, see the CKS topic on Palliative care - constipation.
- Dry mouth can be troublesome. Consider reducing the dose of, or stopping, any drugs that also cause dry mouth. People should be encouraged to use simple measures first:
- Cold, unsweetened drinks.
- Frequent sips or sprays of cold water.
- Ice cubes, crushed ice, or ice lollies.
- Lubricant on the lips.
- Sugar-free products — chewing gum, mints, boiled sweets, or pastilles.
- For more information, and what to do if simple measures are not adequate, see the CKS topic on Palliative care - oral.
[Regnard, 2022; National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016; Wilcock, 2020; NHS Scotland, 2021]
Switching from morphine to another strong opioid
- Seek specialist advice, or consult local guidelines (where available), when selecting the opioid and dose to switch to. This is because experience in primary care is likely to be limited and alternative oral opioids are best initiated by a person with experience in palliative care.
- See Table 4 for information on approximate equivalent potencies of oral opioids to oral morphine, which is produced by the UKMI in the Q&A document What are the equivalent doses of oral morphine to other oral opioids when used as analgesics in adult palliative care? [McKie, 2016].
- Particular attention to monitoring and dose titration up or down is needed when:
- Switching between opioids at high doses.
- There has been a recent rapid escalation of the first opioid.
- In primary care, when switching the route of administration of one strong opioid to another, the most common switch is from oral morphine sulphate to subcutaneous morphine. See Table 5.
- The oral to subcutaneous potency ratio of morphine is between 1:2 and 1:3 (that is, the subcutaneous dose is one third to one half of the oral dose). In practice, most centres divide the oral dose by two and re-titrate as necessary. See Table 4.
Table 4. Approximate equivalent potencies of oral opioids to oral morphine.
| Oral drug | Duration of action (hours) (standard release preparations) | Potency equivalence to morphine (oral to oral) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buprenorphine | 6–8 | 80 (sublingual) | Care required as only one literature source suggests a conversion although this potency equivalence has been cited for a number of years. No dose equivalence studies comparing sublingual buprenorphine with oral morphine have been published. Reports of undesirable effects in patients switched to high doses of buprenorphine (6–24 mg/24 hours) |
| Codeine | 0.5–6 | 0.1 | |
| Dihydrocodeine | 3–6 | 0.1 | |
| Hydromorphone | 4–5 | 3.5–10 | Some sources suggest using a potency equivalence of 5 when converting from morphine to hydromorphone. The manufacturer states an approximate potency equivalence of 5–10 |
| Morphine | 3–6 | 1 | |
| Oxycodone | 3–6 | 1.5–2 | Note high oral bioavailability compared to morphine. One manufacturer advises a potency equivalence of 1.5–2 with prolonged release formulations, together with a 25–50% dose reduction following conversion. Other manufacturers state an approximate potency equivalence of 2 |
| Tramadol | 3–9 | 0.1–0.17 | Manufacturer advises a potency equivalence of 0.1–0.17 |
| Equivalent potencies are only approximate and can be unpredictable. When converting from one opioid to another, it is often appropriate to use a lower dose than the suggested equivalence above. Close monitoring for side effects and efficacy is mandatory, especially at higher doses. | |||
| Data from: [McKie, 2016] | |||
Table 5. Equivalent doses of oral morphine sulphate to the subcutaneous route.
| Oral morphine dose (mg) | Subcutaneous infusion of opioid (mg) |
|---|---|
| Morphine sulphate | Morphine sulphate (approximately half of oral morphine dose) |
| 30 | 15 |
| 60 | 30 |
| 90 | 45 |
| 180 | 90 |
| 240 | 120 |
| Data from: [Northern England Clinical Network, 2016; BNF, 2020] | |
[National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2016; Wilcock, 2020; BNF, 2021; NHS Scotland, 2021]
Avoiding prescribing errors
- In order to avoid prescribing errors:
- Prescribe by mass (for example 2 mg) rather than by volume (for example 2 mL).
- Avoid decimal points in doses if possible (for example 2.5 mg) to minimize the risk of dose errors, and try to avoid prescribing awkward doses.
- If using morphine 10 mg/5 mL oral solution, doses without a decimal point are easier to measure (for example 2 mg [1 mL of solution]).
- Final doses of morphine cannot be predicted from age, body weight, or body surface area. The starting dose of oral morphine should take into account previous exposure to opioids.
- These recommendations are pragmatic and based on what CKS considers to be good practice.
What issues should I consider before prescribing a tricyclic antidepressant drug?
- For prescribing information, see the section on Tricyclics in the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
What issues should I consider before prescribing pregabalin?
- For prescribing information, see the section on Pregabalin in the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
What issues should I consider before prescribing gabapentin?
- For prescribing information, see the section on Gabapentin in the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
What issues should I consider before prescribing dexamethasone?
- For detailed information on prescribing dexamethasone, see the CKS topic on Corticosteroids - oral.
What issues should I consider before prescribing benzodiazepines?
- The most frequent adverse effects are drowsiness, sedation, muscle weakness, and ataxia. These effects are caused by depression of the central nervous system, and they generally decrease with continued use of the drug. Warn the person to avoid activities (such as driving) in which drowsiness may be detrimental.
- Less frequent adverse effects include vertigo, headache, confusion, depression, amnesia, and paradoxical excitation.
What issues should I consider before prescribing baclofen?
- Sedation, drowsiness, and nausea are commonly reported adverse effects.
- Do not stop baclofen abruptly; sudden withdrawal can lead to serious adverse effects such as agitation, confusion, hallucinations, psychosis, mania, paranoia, convulsions, tachycardia, hyperthermia and hypertonia.
- Gradually reduce the dose over 1–2 weeks, or over a longer period if adverse effects occur during withdrawal.
- Consider using diazepam rather than baclofen in people with:
- Active (or history of) peptic ulceration, as baclofen stimulates gastric acid secretion.
- Psychiatric disorders, such as psychosis, schizophrenia, depression, or mania, as baclofen may exacerbate these conditions.
- Epilepsy, as baclofen may lower the seizure threshold; expert supervision is advised.
- Urinary retention, which may be exacerbated in people with a hypertonic bladder sphincter.
- Renal impairment — the initial dose should be reduced in people with moderate to severe renal impairment, and titrated upwards according to the response.
- Undesirable effects of unknown frequency include: face swelling and peripheral oedema, alopecia, hypersensitivity, and sexual dysfunction.
What issues should I consider before prescribing hyoscine butylbromide?
- Hyoscine butylbromide should not be administered to people with:
- Myasthenia gravis.
- Megacolon.
- Narrow-angle glaucoma.
- Tachycardia.
- Prostatic enlargement with urinary retention.
- Mechanical stenoses in the region of the gastrointestinal tract, or paralytic ileus.
- Hyoscine butylbromide has a rapid onset of action and starts to take effect within 10 minutes of subcutaneous administration with a duration of action of up to 2 hours.
- Common adverse effects of antimuscarinic drugs that may occur with increasing dose include dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, and blurred vision.
- CKS found no evidence on the extent to which these occur in people in the terminal phase of illness.
- Hyoscine butylbromide does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier and therefore does not produce central nervous system adverse effects.
Supporting evidence
Evidence on drugs to treat neuropathic pain
The recommendations for drug choice for the treatment of neuropathic pain are based on the guidance issued by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on drug treatment of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [NICE, 2010].
- Having reviewed the evidence for a number of neuropathic conditions (including cancer pain and neuropathic cancer pain), the NICE guidance development group (GDG) treated the term 'neuropathic pain' as a blanket condition regardless of the underlying cause; the GDG considered this to be helpful and practical for non-specialist healthcare professionals and patients.
- However condition-specific recommendations were made if robust evidence on clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness existed (as in the case of painful diabetic neuropathy), or where the evidence was clearly uncertain and insufficient to alter current clinical practice (as in the case of trigeminal neuralgia).
- The GDG acknowledged that evidence for treating a particular neuropathic pain condition with a particular aetiology is often extrapolated to other neuropathic pain conditions with other aetiologies, although there is little evidence to support the validity of this.
- For the treatment of neuropathic pain in people with cancer, the GDG identified only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing amitriptyline with placebo, one RCT comparing gabapentin with placebo, and no RCTs evaluating pregabalin.
- For further information, see the CKS topic on Neuropathic pain - drug treatment.
The remainder of this CKS topic incorporates guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer [NICE, 2004] and Care of dying adults in the last days of life [NICE, 2015a]. The rationale for the primary care management is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation sections. CKS has not summarized the evidence for secondary care investigations and management as they are outside the scope of this topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of palliative care - pain.
Search dates
October 2016 - March 2021
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp Palliative Care/, exp Terminal Care/, exp Terminally Ill/, palliat$.tw., (terminal adj care).tw., (palliative or terminal$ or end of life).tw., (advanced adj disease).tw.
- exp Pain/, pain.tw.
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- ABPI (2019) SPC for Baclofen tablets 10mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2020a) SPC for sevredol 10mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2020b) SPC for hyoscine butylbromide 20mg/ml for injection. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Back, I., Watson, M., Armstrong, P., et al. (2021) Palliative Care Adult Network Guidelines. https://book.pallcare.info/index.php
- BNF (2020) British National Formulary. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. bnf.nice.org.uk
- BNF (2021) British National Formulary. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Cherny, N.I. (2015)
Cancer pain syndromes .In: Cherny, N.I., Fallon, M., Kaasa, S., et al.(Eds.) Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - CSM (2005) Updated advice on the safety of selective COX-2 inhibitors. Committee on Safety of Medicines.. www.mhra.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2024) SPC for Lioresal (baclofen) liquid. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Fallon, M. and Giusti, R. (2018) Management of Cancer Pain in Adult Patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology 29(4), 116-191. [Abstract]
- Gordon-Williams, R.M. and Dickenson, A.H. (2015)
Pathophysiology of pain in cancer and other terminal illnesses .In: Cherny, N.I., Fallon, M., Kaasa, S., et al.(Eds.) Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - McKie, J., (2016) What are the equivalent doses of oral morphine to other oral opioids when used as analgesics in adult palliative care? UKMI. http://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (2016) Palliative care for adults: strong opioids for pain relief (full NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NHS Scotland (2021) Scottish palliative care guidelines. NHS Scotland. https://www.palliativecareguidelines.scot.nhs.uk
- NICE (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer (NICE guideline). Guidance on Cancer Services. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2008a) Osteoarthritis. The care and management of osteoarthritis in adults (NICE guideline) [Replaced by CG177]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk
- NICE (2008b) Metastatic spinal cord compression: diagnosis and management of adults at risk of and with metastatic spinal cord compression (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2009a) Rheumatoid arthritis: the management of rheumatoid arthritis (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2009b) Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2010) Neuropathic pain. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [Replaced by CG173]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk
- NICE (2012) Opioids in palliative care: safe and effective prescribing of strong opioids for pain in palliative care of adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2013) End of life care for adults (quality standard). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2015a) Care of dying adults in the last days of life (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2015b) Key therapeutic topics - medicines management options for local implementation. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.. www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- North of England Cancer Network (2016) Palliative and end of life care guidelines. Symptom control for cancer and non-cancer patients. Northern England Clinical Network. http://www.nescn.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- Regnard, C. and Dean, M. (2022) A guide to symptom relief in palliative care. 6th edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
- SIGN (2008) Control of pain in adults with cancer: a national clinical guideline. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- Twycross, R. and Wilcock, A. (2016)
Introducing palliative care .In: Twycross, R. and Wilcock, A.(Eds.) Introducing Palliative Care. Padstow, Cornwall: Pharmaceutical Press. - Wessex Palliative Physicians (2019) The Palliative Care Handbook A Good Practice Guide. Wessex Palliative Physicians. https://www.weld-hospice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- WHO (1996) Cancer pain relief.. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- WHO (2003) WHO's pain ladder. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int [Free Full-text]
- Wilcock A., Howard, P. and Charlesworth, S. (2020)
Palliative care formulary .In: Wilcock A., Howard, P. and Charlesworth, S.(Eds.) Palliative Care Formulary. London: Pharmaceutical Press.