Cardiovascular Pregnancy Women's health
Hypertension in pregnancy
Last revised in January 2025
Several different hypertensive disorders can complicate pregnancy.
Hypertension in pregnancy: Summary
- Several different hypertensive disorders can complicate pregnancy. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) uses the following working definitions:
- Hypertension — diastolic blood pressure of 90–109 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure of 140–159 mmHg.
- Severe hypertension — diastolic blood pressure of 110 mmHg or greater and/or systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg or greater.
- Chronic hypertension — hypertension that is present at, or prior to the booking visit, or before 20 weeks gestation.
- Gestational hypertension — new hypertension presenting after 20 weeks gestation without significant proteinuria.
- Pre-eclampsia — new hypertension presenting after 20 weeks gestation with significant proteinuria. Pre-eclampsia is a multi-system disorder which can affect the placenta, kidney, liver, brain, and other maternal organs.
- HELLP syndrome (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets syndrome) is a severe form of pre-eclampsia.
- Eclampsia is the occurrence of one or more seizures in a woman with pre-eclampsia.
- Blood pressure should be taken and a dipstick urine test done for proteinuria at presentation and at each antenatal visit.
- Significant proteinuria is a urinary protein:creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/mmol, or albumin:creatinine ratio of at least 8 mg/mmol. Proteinuria of at least [1+] on dipstick testing should prompt one of these additional tests.
- Women at high risk of pre-eclampsia should:
- Be referred for consultant-led care.
- Take aspirin 75 mg to 150 mg daily from 12 weeks gestation until the birth of the baby.
- Be provided with an explanation of the symptoms of pre-eclampsia and advised to seek immediate medical review if she develops any of the following (including during the first four weeks postpartum):
- Severe headaches (increasing frequency unrelieved by regular analgesics).
- Visual problems, such as blurred vision, flashing lights, double vision, or floating spots.
- Persistent new epigastric pain or pain in the right upper quadrant.
- Vomiting.
- Breathlessness.
- Sudden swelling of the face, hands, or feet.
- Women with suspected pre-eclampsia require urgent secondary care assessment.
- Women with chronic hypertension are at high risk of developing pre-eclampsia and should be referred for consultant-led care. While awaiting referral:
- Review antihypertensive treatment and consider alternatives which are preferred for use in pregnancy.
- Consider starting antihypertensive treatment if antihypertensives are not already being used.
- Recommend aspirin 75 mg to 150 mg daily from 12 weeks gestation until the birth of the baby.
- Women with suspected gestational hypertension should be referred for secondary care assessment within 24 hours.
- Postpartum monitoring and follow-up is essential for all women who experience hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
This CKS topic does not cover the secondary care management of hypertension in pregnancy in detail.
There are separate CKS topics on Diabetes - type 2 and Chronic kidney disease.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
January 2025 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2024 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to the topic. A minor correction was made to the figures quoted relating to prognosis in future pregnancies. Given that there is no strong evidence that ACE inhibitor or ARB use in the first trimester poses a teratogenic risk to the fetus, a recommendation was added to provide reassurance where inadvertent exposure has occurred. Recommendations were altered regarding culture and sensitivity testing for women with asymptomatic bacteriuria, to align the topic with the latest guidance from NHS England.
Previous changes
May 2022 — minor update. New adverse effects of nipple pain and Raynaud's phenomenon of the nipple added to the labetalol prescribing section in line with the manufacturers summary of product characteristics.
July 2020 — minor update. Typographical error corrected.
September to October 2019 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2019 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
August 2019 — minor update. NICE Quality Standards added.
October 2016 — minor update. Angioedema and urticaria added as adverse effects of methyldopa.
February to March 2015 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in February 2015 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
November 2012 — minor update. The links to the electronic medicines website (www.medicines.org.uk) have been updated.
August to November 2010 — topic updated. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
January to March 2006 — rewritten. Validated in June 2006 and issued in July 2006.
November 2005 — minor technical update.
March 2004 — reviewed. Validated in March 2003 and issued in April 2003.
November 1999 — written. Validated in March 2000 and issued in September 2000.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
- De Backer, J., Haugaa, K.H, Hasselberg, N.E., (2025) 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy: Developed by the task force on the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj [Free Full-text]
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 January 2025.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 September 2019.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 January 2025.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 January 2025.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 January 2025.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 January 2025.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 January 2025.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Diagnose raised blood pressure during pregnancy and in the postpartum period.
- Provide appropriate management to facilitate the control of raised blood pressure during pregnancy and postpartum.
- Refer to secondary care appropriately.
- Detect pre-eclampsia early and admit appropriately for further assessment.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.
Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.
QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.
QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.
NICE quality standards
Hypertension in pregnancy
- Women of childbearing potential with treated hypertension are given information annually about safe antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy.
- Pregnant women at increased risk of pre-eclampsia at the booking appointment are offered a prescription of 75–150 mg of aspirin to take daily from 12 weeks until birth.
- Pregnant women taking antihypertensive medication have a blood pressure target of 135/85 mmHg or less.
- Pregnant women with severe hypertension are admitted for a full assessment, carried out by a healthcare professional trained in managing hypertension in pregnancy.
- Women with pre-eclampsia who have severe hypertension or are at a high risk of adverse events, or if there are any clinical concerns are admitted to hospital and monitored.
- Women with pre-eclampsia have a senior obstetrician involved in any decisions about the timing of birth.
- Women who have had hypertension in pregnancy have a plan for ongoing antihypertensive management included in their postnatal care plan, which is communicated to their GP when they are transferred to community care after the birth.
- Women who have had gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia discuss future pregnancy and lifetime cardiovascular risks during a medical review at their 6–8 week postnatal medical check.
Background information
What is it?
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) defines the different hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as [NICE, 2021; NICE, 2023]:
- Hypertension — diastolic blood pressure of 90–109 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure of 140–159 mmHg. A diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or greater on two occasions more than 4 hours apart, and/or a single diastolic blood pressure reading greater than 110 mmHg should prompt increased surveillance.
- Severe hypertension — diastolic blood pressure of 110 mmHg or greater and/or systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg or greater. Systolic blood pressure above 160 mmHg on two consecutive readings at least 4 hours apart should prompt consideration of treatment.
- Chronic hypertension — hypertension that is present at, or prior to the booking visit, or before 20 weeks gestation. As blood pressure tends to fall during the first and second trimesters, a woman with high blood pressure before 20 weeks gestation can be assumed to have pre-existing hypertension.
- Gestational hypertension — new hypertension presenting after 20 weeks gestation without significant proteinuria.
- Pre-eclampsia
- New onset of hypertension (over 140 mmHg systolic or over 90 mmHg diastolic) after 20 weeks of pregnancy and the coexistence of 1 or more of the following new-onset conditions:
- Proteinuria (urine protein:creatinine ratio of 30 mg/mmol or more, albumin:creatinine ratio of 8 mg/mmol or more, or at least 1 g/litre [2+] on dipstick testing).
- Other maternal organ dysfunction [ACOG, 2020; NICE, 2023; Wu, 2023]:
- Renal insufficiency (creatinine 90 micromol/litre or more, 1.02 mg/100 ml or more).
- Liver involvement (elevated transaminases [alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase over 40 IU/litre] with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain).
- Neurological complications such as eclampsia, altered mental status, blindness, stroke, clonus, severe headaches, or persistent visual scotomata.
- Haematological complications such as thrombocytopenia (platelet count below 150,000 per microlitre), disseminated intravascular coagulation or haemolysis.
- Uteroplacental dysfunction such as fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery doppler waveform analysis, or stillbirth.
- Symptoms of pre-eclampsia include [ACOG, 2020; NICE, 2023; Wu, 2023]:
- Severe headaches (increasing frequency unrelieved by regular analgesics).
- Visual problems, such as blurred vision, flashing lights or photophobia.
- Persistent new epigastric pain or pain in the right upper quadrant.
- Vomiting.
- Breathlessness (due to pulmonary oedema).
- Sudden swelling of the face, hands, or feet.
- New onset of hypertension (over 140 mmHg systolic or over 90 mmHg diastolic) after 20 weeks of pregnancy and the coexistence of 1 or more of the following new-onset conditions:
- HELLP syndrome (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets syndrome) is a severe form of pre-eclampsia that is associated with high maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [ACOG, 2020; NICE, 2023].
- Eclampsia is the occurrence of one or more seizures in a woman with pre-eclampsia [ACOG, 2020; NICE, 2023].
Additionally, pre-eclampsia can be superimposed on chronic hypertension — suggested by onset of new symptoms or signs of pre-eclampsia after 20 weeks gestation in a woman with chronic hypertension [Kametas, 2022].
How common is it?
- Hypertensive disorders occur in 8–10% of all pregnancies.
- Chronic hypertension has been reported to complicate 0.6–2.7% of pregnancies.
- Gestational hypertension is probably under-reported, with recorded rates of 4.2–7.9%.
- Pre-eclampsia rates range from 1.5–7.7% but depend on parity: 4.1% of women in their first pregnancy and 1.7% of women in their second pregnancy have pre-eclampsia.
- Haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome or elevated liver enzymes low platelet syndrome (ELLP syndrome). Incidence estimates vary from 0.5–7.6 per 1000 deliveries, and between 8–24% of cases with severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [UKOSS, 2023].
- Eclampsia is a rare but serious complication. Between April 2023 and March 2024, 270 deliveries in England were complicated by eclampsia, equivalent to 5 per 10,000 births [NHS England, 2024].
What are the risk factors?
- Risk factors for gestational hypertension may include:
- Nulliparity (rates in nulliparous women range from 6–17% while rates in multiparous women range from 2–4%).
- Multiple pregnancy.
- Black ethnicity.
- Maternal obesity.
- Maternal type 1 diabetes.
- Women are at high risk of pre-eclampsia if they have:
- One of the following high-risk factors:
- A history of hypertensive disease during a previous pregnancy.
- Chronic kidney disease.
- Autoimmune disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome.
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
- Chronic hypertension.
- Two or more of the following moderate risk factors:
- First pregnancy.
- Aged 40 years or older.
- Pregnancy interval of more than 10 years.
- Body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or greater at the first visit.
- Family history of pre-eclampsia.
- Multiple pregnancy.
- A 2016 meta-analysis which included data from more than 25 million women identified that a previous pregnancy complicated by a hypertensive disorder, chronic hypertension or antiphospholipid syndrome was associated with the highest absolute risk of pre-eclampsia, but that obese women and the nulliparous accounted for the largest populations at risk (11%).
- Other risk factors for pre-eclampsia include:
- Black ethnicity.
- Low socioeconomic status.
- History of stillbirth or placental abruption.
- Gestational hypertension — it is estimated that 10–25% of women with gestational hypertension will develop pre-eclampsia.
- One of the following high-risk factors:
[ACOG, 2020; Garovic, 2022; NICE, 2023; Wu, 2023; BMJ Best Practice, 2024]
What is the prognosis?
Prognosis for current pregnancy.
- Chronic hypertension
- Most women with pre-existing mild to moderate hypertension, with blood pressure less than 160/110 mmHg, will have good maternal and neonatal outcomes [National High Blood Pressure Education Program, 2000].
- Meta-analysis of data from 38 studies shows that overall, around 25% of women with chronic hypertension will develop superimposed pre-eclampsia. This is an 8-fold higher rate of pre-eclampsia than that observed in women in the background population [Bramham, 2014]. The incidence appears to be further increased if hypertension is severe, has been present for at least 4 years, is associated with renal insufficiency, and/or there is a history of hypertension in a previous pregnancy [National High Blood Pressure Education Program, 2000].
- Gestational hypertension [PRECOG, 2004]
- With onset before 32 weeks, will progress to pre-eclampsia in 50% of pregnancies.
- With onset at 32–35 weeks, will progress in 40%.
- With onset at 38 weeks or later, will progress to pre-eclampsia in fewer than 10%.
- Pre-eclampsia
- Pre-eclampsia is associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications. It is not possible to predict those women at risk of complications, although prognosis is poorer in pre-eclampsia occurring before 34 weeks gestation than when it occurs later in pregnancy [Lisonkova, 2013].
- Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome and eclampsia are associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality [Rudra, 2011].
Prognosis for future pregnancies [NICE, 2023].
- In women with gestational hypertension, studies indicate that in a future pregnancy:
- The risk of any hypertension is around 22%.
- The risk of gestational hypertension is between 11% and 15%.
- The risk of pre-eclampsia is around 7%.
- In women with pre-eclampsia, studies indicate that in a future pregnancy:
- The risk of any hypertension is around 20%.
- The risk of gestational hypertension is between 6% and 12%.
- The risk of pre-eclampsia is up to 16%, and varies depending on the timing of delivery in the current affected pregnancy. Where delivery is:
- Between 28 and 34 weeks gestation, the risk of pre-eclampsia in a future pregnancy is about 33%.
- Between 34 and 37 weeks gestation, the risk of pre-eclampsia in a future pregnancy is about 23%.
Maternal, fetal and childhood outcomes
- Untreated or poorly controlled hypertensive disorders of pregnancy carry risks of adverse maternal outcomes including [Garovic, 2022; Metoki, 2022]:
- Mortality and spontaneous coronary artery dissection, with the highest risks among women with pre-eclampsia.
- Myocardial infarction and peripartum cardiomyopathy, with the highest risks among women with pre-eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.
- Stroke, with the highest risks among women with eclampsia.
- Untreated or poorly controlled hypertensive disorders of pregnancy carry risks of adverse fetal/pregnancy outcomes including [Garovic, 2022; Metoki, 2022]:
- Intrauterine growth restriction, with the highest risks among those with severe hypertension.
- Stillbirth, with the highest risks among those with chronic hypertension or pre-eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.
- Prematurity and placental abruption, with the highest risks among those with pre-eclampsia or pre-eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension.
- Postpartum haemorrhage, with the highest risks among those with pre-eclampsia.
- One review article reported that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy may also affect longer term offspring health and developmental outcomes including [Metoki, 2022] increased risks of asthma, autism spectrum disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
What are the complications for the current pregnancy?
- Complications of chronic hypertension:
- Chronic hypertension is associated with an increased risk of fetal morbidity and mortality, even in the absence of superimposed pre-eclampsia [Ferrer, 2000; National High Blood Pressure Education Program, 2000].
- Around 25% of women with chronic hypertension will develop superimposed pre-eclampsia [Bramham, 2014].
- Compared to women in the background population, women with chronic hypertension have a 3-fold increased risk of preterm delivery, a 3-fold increased risk of having a baby with a low birth weight, a 3-fold increased risk of having a baby requiring neonatal intensive care, and a 4-fold increased risk of having a baby who dies in the perinatal period [Bramham, 2014; MBRRACE-UK, 2023].
- Complications of gestational hypertension:
- Gestational hypertension occurring before 35 weeks gestation is associated with a 40–50% risk of pre-eclampsia and an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [PRECOG, 2004].
- Other fetal or neonatal complications associated with gestational hypertension include earlier delivery, stillbirth, requirement for Caesarean delivery, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy also increase the risk of adverse maternal cardiovascular outcomes, including pregnancy-associated stroke [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- Complications of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
- Pre-eclampsia is a multi-system disorder that is associated with significant maternal morbidity. It can lead to eclamptic seizures, acute renal failure, liver dysfunction, and coagulation abnormalities [Rudra, 2011].
- In the UK, figures from 2019—2021 suggest that around 4 in every million pregnant women will die from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, accounting for 4% of all UK maternal deaths in the period [MBRRACE-UK, 2023].
- Causes of death related to pre-eclampsia can include intracranial haemorrhage, cerebral infarction, cerebral oedema, acute respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary oedema, hepatic rupture, and hepatic failure/necrosis [PRECOG, 2004].
- Pregnancy/fetal/neonatal complications include placental abruption, IUGR, preterm delivery, stillbirth, and neonatal death [Rudra, 2011].
Long-term health implications
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with lifelong adverse health implications [Al Khalaf, 2023; NICE, 2023]:
- Women with gestational hypertension exhibit:
- A 2–4-fold increased risk of hypertension.
- A possible increased risk of stroke.
- A 1.5–3-fold increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular event.
- Women with chronic hypertension exhibit:
- A 1.8–4-fold increased risk of stroke.
- A 1.7–2.2-fold increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular event.
- A 2.1-fold increased risk of cardiac atherosclerosis.
- A 1.7-fold increased risk of peripheral disease.
- Women with pre-eclampsia exhibit:
- A 2–5-fold increased risk of hypertension.
- A 2–3-fold increased risk of stroke.
- An approximately 2-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.
- A 1.5–3-fold increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular event.
- The risk seems to be greatest in women who develop pre-eclampsia before 37 weeks gestation, who have an approximately 8-fold increased risk of ischaemic heart disease compared to women without pre-eclampsia [Bellamy, 2007].
- There seems to be an increasing risk with the severity of hypertension. Mild hypertension has been associated with a 2-fold risk of future cardiovascular disease, moderate hypertension with a 3-fold increased risk, and severe hypertension with a greater than 5-fold increased risk [McDonald, 2008].
- It is not known whether pre-eclampsia is the cause of the subsequent increased risk or whether the pre-eclampsia is caused by an underlying disorder [Bellamy, 2007; McDonald, 2008].
- An increased risk of end-stage kidney disease — there is good evidence from a population-based study of over 570,000 women that those with a history of pre-eclampsia are at increased risk of developing end-stage kidney disease, although the absolute risk is low [Vikse, 2008].
- Although increased, the risk (estimated at 3.7 events per 100 000 women per year) is only slightly higher than that of the general population in women who have no hypertension or proteinuria 6–8 weeks after birth [NICE, 2023].
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have also been associated with increased risks of maternal type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, vascular dementia, and venous thromboembolism [Garovic, 2022; Wu, 2023].
Management
Scenario: Pre-eclampsia
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
How do I manage a woman at high risk of, or exhibiting clinical features of pre-eclampsia?
- Note: The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) defines pre-eclampsia as new onset of hypertension (over 140 mmHg systolic or over 90 mmHg diastolic) after 20 weeks of pregnancy and the coexistence of 1 or more of the following new-onset conditions:
- Proteinuria, or
- Other maternal organ dysfunction:
- Renal insufficiency (creatinine 90 micromol/litre or more, 1.02 mg/100 ml or more).
- Liver involvement (elevated transaminases [alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase over 40 IU/litre] with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain).
- Neurological complications such as eclampsia, altered mental status, blindness, stroke, clonus, severe headaches, or persistent visual scotomata.
- Haematological complications such as thrombocytopenia (platelet count below 150,000 per microlitre), disseminated intravascular coagulation or haemolysis.
- Uteroplacental dysfunction such as fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis, or stillbirth.
- Be aware that women are considered to be at high risk of pre-eclampsia if they have:
- One of the following high-risk factors:
- A history of hypertensive disease during a previous pregnancy.
- Chronic kidney disease.
- Autoimmune disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome.
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
- Chronic hypertension.
- Two or more of the following moderate risk factors:
- First pregnancy.
- Aged 40 years or older.
- Pregnancy interval of more than 10 years.
- Body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or greater at the first visit.
- Family history of pre-eclampsia.
- Multiple pregnancy.
- One of the following high-risk factors:
- For women assessed to be at high risk of pre-eclampsia:
- Refer for consultant-led care at booking for specialist input to assess and manage the obstetric risk.
- Ensure that aspirin 75 mg to 150 mg daily is prescribed from 12 weeks gestation until birth. This is usually arranged in secondary care, but should be initiated in primary care if the woman will not be seen by a specialist until after 12 weeks.
- Seek specialist advice before prescribing aspirin to girls younger than 16 years of age, and in those with thrombophilia or uncontrolled blood pressure. There is no evidence that use of low-dose aspirin in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other fetal complications.
- Offer advice about healthy lifestyle (including rest, work, exercise, and weight) as recommended for all pregnant women. For more information, see the CKS topic on Antenatal care - uncomplicated pregnancy.
- For all pregnant women, dipstick the urine for protein and measure blood pressure at each antenatal visit.
- If dipstick screening is positive [1+ or more], use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- If using protein:creatinine ratio, use 30 mg/mmol as a threshold for significant proteinuria.
- If using albumin:creatinine ratio, use 8 mg/mmol as a diagnostic threshold.
- Do not use first morning urine void to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- Note: it is recommended that proteinuria measurements in pregnant women are interpreted in the context of an assessment of symptoms, signs and other investigations for pre-eclampsia. If significant proteinuria is detected but there is still uncertainty about the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, consider re‑testing on a new sample, in conjunctions with clinical assessment. Seek specialist advice where there is uncertainty.
- If dipstick screening is positive [1+ or more], use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- Advise all pregnant women to seek immediate medical review if they experience symptoms of pre-eclampsia (including during the first 4 weeks postpartum), such as:
- Severe headache.
- Problems with vision, such as blurring or flashing before the eyes.
- Severe pain just below the ribs.
- Vomiting.
- Sudden swelling of the face, hands, or feet.
- Arrange emergency secondary care assessment for any woman in whom pre-eclampsia is suspected. Advise women with severe hypertension (blood pressure of 160/110 mmHg or more) that they will be offered hospital admission for ongoing monitoring of their condition and of their baby's wellbeing.
- Women with less severe hypertension may be offered admission depending upon whether there are clinical concerns for the wellbeing of the woman or baby or if they are considered to be at high risk of adverse events. If there are no such concerns, the woman will be offered ongoing specialist management on an outpatient basis.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on management of women at high risk of, or exhibiting clinical features of pre-eclampsia are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the NICE guideline Antenatal care [NICE, 2021], Action on Pre-eclampsia's Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) [PRECOG, 2004], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice Guideline Gestational Hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion published in a narrative literature review [Wu, 2023].
Early referral to obstetrics
- In the absence of any explicit guidance from NICE, the recommendation to refer those at high risk of pre-eclampsia early in pregnancy is based on the Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG).
- The pre-eclampsia specialists in the guideline development group reviewed the available evidence and concluded that these women may benefit from specialist input to assess their obstetric risk [PRECOG, 2004]. An expert reviewer of this CKS topic also advised that it is routine practice for women who are at high risk of pre-eclampsia to be referred to a consultant obstetrician.
- The BMJ Best Practice Guideline recommends a range of maternal and fetal investigations which are performed in secondary care, including fetal cardiotocography, full blood count, renal function, liver function tests, and the use of placental growth factor (PIGF)-based testing [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
Emergency assessment
- The advice to arrange emergency secondary care assessment for any women in whom pre-eclampsia is suspected is based on advice from NICE which states 'assessment of women with pre-eclampsia should be performed by a healthcare professional trained in the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy' [NICE, 2023] .
Risk factors
- Risk factors for pre-eclampsia are described in the NICE guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023] , Action on Pre-eclampsia's Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) [PRECOG, 2004], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice Guideline Gestational Hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion published in narrative literature reviews [Wu, 2023].
- A 2016 meta-analysis which included data generated from more than 25 million women identified that previous hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, chronic hypertension and antiphospholipid syndrome were associated with the highest absolute risk of pre-eclampsia, but that obese women and the nulliparous accounted for the largest populations at risk (11%) [Wu, 2023].
Secondary care management
- There is no corrective treatment for pre-eclampsia. To prevent maternal complications and fetal death, intensive surveillance and preterm delivery are the mainstay of treatment in secondary care [Wu, 2023].
Scenario: Chronic hypertension, or new hypertension before 20 weeks' gestation
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
How should I manage a woman with chronic hypertension?
- Offer advice about:
- Healthy lifestyle (including work, rest, exercise, healthy diet, and weight) as recommended for all pregnant women. For more information, see the CKS topic on Antenatal care - uncomplicated pregnancy.
- Restriction of dietary salt. For more information, see the CKS topic on Hypertension.
- Be aware that women with chronic hypertension are at high risk of pre-eclampsia and should be referred for consultant-led care at booking for specialist input to assess and manage the obstetric risk.
- While the woman is waiting to see a specialist, if she is taking:
- An angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for hypertension, stop this immediately and prescribe an alternative antihypertensive if necessary.
- Explain that there is an increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes if these drugs are taken during pregnancy, particularly during the second and third trimesters.
- Advise women who have continued to take ACE inhibitors or ARBs during the first trimester that there is no strong evidence that this is associated with increased risk to the fetus.
- An ACE inhibitor or ARB for another condition such as renal disease, treatment should also be stopped — seek specialist advice on alternative treatment.
- A thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic — prescribe an alternative antihypertensive if necessary or seek specialist advice on alternative treatment if being used for another indication.
- Any other antihypertensive — consider continuing existing treatment if necessary. Advise the woman that the limited evidence available has not shown an increased risk of congenital malformation with such treatments.
- An angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) for hypertension, stop this immediately and prescribe an alternative antihypertensive if necessary.
- Be aware that pregnant women previously diagnosed with chronic hypertension may exhibit blood pressure within the normal range due to the physiological drop in blood pressure that occurs in early pregnancy. Continued antihypertensive treatment is not necessary if either:
- Sustained systolic blood pressure is less than 110 mmHg.
- Sustained diastolic blood pressure is less than 70 mmHg.
- The woman has symptomatic hypotension.
- If an alternative antihypertensive treatment is required during pregnancy:
- First-line treatment is usually labetalol if not contraindicated.
- Consider nifedipine for women in whom labetalol is not suitable.
- Consider methyldopa if both labetalol and nifedipine are not suitable.
- Base the choice on any pre-existing treatment, side-effect profiles, risks (including fetal effects) and the woman's preference.
- For more information, including recommended doses, see the relevant sections in Prescribing information.
- If a woman with chronic hypertension is not already taking antihypertensive treatment, while she is waiting to see a specialist, offer drug treatment if there is either:
- Sustained systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher.
- Sustained diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or higher.
- Target blood pressure following antihypertensive treatment in pregnancy is 135/85 mmHg.
- Ensure that aspirin 75 mg to 150 mg daily is prescribed from 12 weeks gestation until birth.
- This is usually arranged in secondary care, but should be initiated in primary care if the woman will not be seen by a specialist until after 12 weeks.
- Specialist advice should always be sought before prescribing aspirin to girls younger than 16 years of age, and in those with thrombophilia or uncontrolled blood pressure.
- This is usually arranged in secondary care, but should be initiated in primary care if the woman will not be seen by a specialist until after 12 weeks.
- Assess for symptoms of pre-eclampsia at each antenatal visit. Advise the woman that she should seek immediate medical review if she develops any symptoms (including during the first four weeks postpartum).
- Dipstick the urine for protein and measure blood pressure at each antenatal visit.
- If dipstick screening is positive [1+ or more], use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- If using protein:creatinine ratio, use 30 mg/mmol as a threshold for significant proteinuria.
- If using albumin:creatinine ratio, use 8 mg/mmol as a diagnostic threshold.
- Do not use first morning urine void to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- If dipstick screening is positive [1+ or more], use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify proteinuria in pregnant women.
- Arrange emergency secondary care assessment for any woman in whom pre-eclampsia is suspected.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on management of women with pre-existing hypertension are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the NICE guideline Antenatal care [NICE, 2021], Action on Pre-eclampsia's Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) [PRECOG, 2004], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice Guideline Gestational Hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion published in a narrative literature review [Wu, 2023].
Early referral to obstetrics
- In the absence of any explicit guidance from NICE, the recommendation to refer those at high risk of pre-eclampsia early in pregnancy is based on the Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG).
- The pre-eclampsia specialists in the guideline development group reviewed the available evidence and concluded that these women may benefit from specialist input to assess their obstetric risk [PRECOG, 2004]. An expert reviewer of this CKS topic also advised that it is routine practice for women who are at high risk of pre-eclampsia to be referred to a consultant obstetrician.
Stopping angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and thiazide or thiazide-type diuretics
- The recommendation to stop antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) during pregnancy is based on expert opinion in the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023].
- Use of ACE inhibitors in the second and third trimester is associated with oligohydramnios and its sequelae, including renal damage, hypoplastic lungs and bladder, compression of skull bones, and intrauterine growth restriction. There may also be increased risks of patent ductus arteriosus and premature delivery [UKTIS, 2021a].
- Use of ARBs in the second or third trimester is associated with oligo-/anhydramnios and its sequelae, including joint contractures, hypocalvaria/widened skull sutures, pulmonary hypoplasia and neonatal renal impairment with or without oligo-/anuria. Thrombosis of the vena cava may also be a feature. Iatrogenic preterm delivery (and therefore low infant birth weight) is also common. ARB exposure appears to be associated with a higher risk of fetopathy than ACE-inhibitor exposure [UKTIS, 2021a; UKTIS, 2021b].
- UKTIS states that there is no strong evidence that exposure to ACE inhibitors or ARBs in the first trimester is associated with congenital malformations in the infant, but there are limited data regarding first trimester ARB exposure specifically, which means that the risk estimate is less conclusive [UKTIS, 2021a; UKTIS, 2021b].
- NICE suggests that women taking ACE inhibitors or ARBs for other indications (such as renal disease) who are planning a pregnancy should discuss alternative treatment with the healthcare professional responsible for managing their condition prior to conception, but offers no advice on management of women with unplanned pregnancies while taking these drugs [NICE, 2023]. The advice that primary care physicians should seek specialist advice on alternative treatment options for women taking ACE inhibitors or ARBs for indications other than hypertension is therefore pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- NICE notes that that there may be an increased risk of infant congenital abnormalities and neonatal complications if thiazide or thiazide-type diuretics are taken during pregnancy and suggests that women taking these drugs who are planning a pregnancy should discuss alternative treatment with the healthcare professional responsible for managing their condition prior to conception. However, no advice on management of women with unplanned pregnancies while taking these drugs is offered [NICE, 2023]. The advice that primary care physicians should switch to an alternative antihypertensive if appropriate, or seek specialist advice on alternative treatment options for women taking these medications for indications other than hypertension is therefore pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy
- NICE guidance recommends treatment where blood pressure exceeds 140/90 mmHg [NICE, 2023].
- NICE advise to consider labetalol to treat chronic hypertension in pregnant women, nifedipine for women in whom labetalol is not suitable, or methyldopa if both labetalol and nifedipine are not suitable [NICE, 2023].
- Labetalol is effective in monotherapy in 80% of women [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- Oral monotherapy with nifedipine is effective in most cases [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- Methyldopa is widely used in lower- and middle-income countries and remains an acceptable alternative if labetalol or nifedipine is not suitable [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
- NICE previously reviewed studies of antihypertensive drugs and found no obvious association with congenital abnormalities for methyldopa, labetalol, atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol, pindolol, prazosin, nifedipine, verapamil, bendroflumethiazide, furosemide, and hydralazine. No or very little information about other antihypertensive drugs is available [NICE, 2023].
- The UK Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) has also carried out systematic evidence reviews of the pregnancy safety of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and methyldopa, with no robust evidence to indicate increased risks of congenital malformation, miscarriage or stillbirth [UKTIS, 2023; UKTIS, 2024a; UKTIS, 2024b].
- Although some studies have described associations between maternal beta-blocker use and impaired fetal growth, because maternal hypertension increases the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, it is not possible to define a causal contribution of beta-blocker exposure to this outcome. Neonatal beta-blockade may occur following maternal beta-blocker use near term, resulting in neonatal bradycardia, hypotension and hypoglycaemia. Neonatal respiratory distress has also been reported [UKTIS, 2024a].
- Data on rates of preterm delivery, fetal growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes are limited but do not indicate [UKTIS, 2023].
- Data do not raise concerns of increased risks of preterm delivery, small for gestational age, perinatal death, neonatal complications or adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes directly related to methyldopa exposure [UKTIS, 2024b].
- The choice of antihypertensive agent for women with gestational hypertension should be based on adverse effect profiles, risk (including fetal effects), and the woman's preferences [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
Secondary care management
- The mainstay of secondary care management in women with chronic hypertension includes maintenance of a safe blood pressure, surveillance of fetal growth, and early detection of pre-eclampsia [Wu, 2023].
- Evidence relating to optimal maternal blood pressure during pregnancy has indicated that maintaining <140/90 mmHg may reduce the risk of a composite of adverse outcomes including severe hypertension, preterm birth, abruption and fetal or neonatal death without impacting fetal growth.
- Evidence relating to the optimal time for delivery are inconclusive, but some studies have demonstrated increased risks of superimposed pre-eclampsia with delivery beyond 39 weeks gestational age.
Scenario: New hypertension after 20 weeks' gestation
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
How should I manage a woman with new hypertension after 20 weeks' gestation?
- Arrange secondary care assessment within 24 hours by a healthcare professional trained in the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for all women with new onset of hypertension (over 140 mmHg systolic or over 90 mmHg diastolic) after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
- Be aware of the signs and symptoms of, and risk factors for pre-eclampsia.
- Advise women with new-onset severe hypertension (blood pressure of 160/110 mmHg or more) that they are likely to be admitted to hospital for ongoing monitoring of their condition and of their baby's wellbeing.
- Women with less severe hypertension may not be routinely admitted and will instead be offered additional maternal and fetal monitoring on an outpatient basis.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on management of women with new onset hypertension after 20 gestational weeks are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the NICE guideline Antenatal care [NICE, 2021], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice Guideline Gestational Hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion published in a narrative literature review [Wu, 2023].
Management of gestational hypertension
- NICE recommends that all women with gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia should be offered an integrated package of care that may include hospital admission, initiation of pharmacotherapy, regular measurement of blood pressure, testing for proteinuria, relevant blood tests, placental growth factor (PLGF)-based testing (to help rule out pre-eclampsia), and assessment of fetal wellbeing [NICE, 2023].
- Admission to hospital if blood pressure is 160/110 mmHg or greater is also recommended [NICE, 2023].
- The BMJ Best Practice Guideline recommends ultrasound examination of estimated fetal weight and amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in all cases where gestational hypertension is diagnosed [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
Secondary care management
- NICE recommends that labetalol is considered for treating gestational hypertension, nifedipine for women in whom labetalol is not suitable, and methyldopa if labetalol or nifedipine are not suitable, with the choice based on side-effect profiles, risk (including fetal effects) and the woman's preferences [NICE, 2023].
- NICE recommends ultrasound scans to assess fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume and umbilical artery doppler velocimetry at diagnosis, with repeat screening every 2 to 4 weeks (subsequent surveillance and monitoring determined by the findings of these scans) [NICE, 2023].
- Planned early delivery may be indicated depending on gestational hypertension severity and concurrent indications. NICE guidelines recommend that planned early birth before 37 weeks should not be offered to women with gestational hypertension whose blood pressure is lower than 160/110 mmHg, unless there are other medical indications [NICE, 2023].
- The optimal timing of delivery for women with gestational hypertension remains unclear, as no data from a large trial are available specifically for this group [Wu, 2023].
- The HYPITAT clinical trial randomised women with gestational hypertension (n=496) and pre-eclampsia with non-severe features (n=246) to induction of labour or expectant management. In this trial, the induction of labour at 37 weeks gestation was associated with a reduction in composite adverse maternal outcomes including new-onset severe preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, pulmonary oedema, or placental abruption, without differences in rates of caesarean delivery or neonatal complications. However, the intervention group had worse neurodevelopment outcomes at age of 2 years [ACOG, 2020; Wu, 2023].
Scenario: Proteinuria and no hypertension after 20 weeks' gestation
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
How should I manage a woman with proteinuria and no hypertension after 20 weeks' gestation?
If the woman is over 20 weeks gestation and has new proteinuria on dipstick testing but no hypertension:
- Be aware that this can be a symptom of impending pre-eclampsia —if there are other symptoms of pre-eclampsia, arrange a same-day obstetric assessment.
- If there are no other symptoms of pre-eclampsia, consider possible urinary tract infection (UTI):
- If there is [1+] protein on dipstick testing and the woman has symptoms of a UTI, consider a working diagnosis of UTI.
- Send a midstream specimen of urine (MSU) for culture and sensitivity and manage appropriately.
- For detailed information on the diagnosis and management of UTI, see the CKS topic on Urinary tract infection (lower) - women.
- For women who are asymptomatic but assessed as being at intermediate or high risk for preterm delivery, or are at risk of developing pyelonephritis or other complications due to UTI, consider a working diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria.
- Send a midstream specimen of urine (MSU) for culture and sensitivity and manage appropriately.
- For detailed information on the diagnosis and management of UTI, see the CKS topic on Urinary tract infection (lower) - women.
- Women who are assessed as having a low-risk pregnancy should be advised to seek urgent medical review if any symptoms of UTI develop.
- If there is [1+] protein on dipstick testing and the woman has symptoms of a UTI, consider a working diagnosis of UTI.
- If there is [2+] protein or more on dipstick testing, arrange urgent secondary care assessment, even if there is evidence of a possible UTI.
- For women with [1+] protein on dipstick testing and no other symptoms of pre-eclampsia:
- Measure the blood pressure, and use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify the proteinuria.
- Arrange a follow-up appointment in primary care and reassess in 1 week.
- Advise the woman to seek immediate medical attention if she develops symptoms of pre-eclampsia in the intervening period.
- At the follow-up appointment, dipstick the urine, measure the blood pressure, and use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify any persistent ([1+] on dipstick) proteinuria.
- Seek specialist obstetric advice if proteinuria is significant (protein:creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/mmol, or albumin:creatinine ratio of at least 8 mg/mmol), or if there are any other concerns or uncertainty.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on the management of women with proteinuria but without hypertension after 20 weeks gestation are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023] and Urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing [NICE, 2018], Action on Pre-eclampsia's Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) [PRECOG, 2004], and the UK Health Security Agency's guideline (published by Public Health England) Diagnosis of urinary tract infections: Quick reference tool for primary care [PHE, 2020].
Secondary care assessment if there are symptoms of pre-eclampsia (including [2+] proteinuria)
- The recommendation to arrange assessment for women with signs and symptoms of pre-eclampsia is based on expert opinion in National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline which advises that women with new onset signs and symptoms of pre-eclampsia should be assessed in a secondary care setting by a healthcare professional who is trained in the management of hypertensive disorders [NICE, 2023]. Expert opinion within the earlier Pre-eclampsia Community Guideline (PRECOG) [PRECOG, 2004] states that proteinuria may be the first clinical indication of pre-eclampsia.
- The recommendation to arrange secondary care assessment for women with [2+] proteinuria is largely based on PRECOG guidelines that all women over 20 weeks' gestation with [2+] proteinuria or more on dipstick testing should be referred for hospital assessment within 48 hours, as this may indicate impending pre-eclampsia or an underlying medical problem [PRECOG, 2004], and from expert opinion in a narrative review that 'a urinary tract infection rarely causes more than [1+] proteinuria' [Williams, 2012].
- Several previous expert reviewers of this CKS topic also advised that all women with [2+] proteinuria or more on dipstick testing should receive hospital assessment, regardless of whether or not a UTI may be present.
Considering possible urinary tract infection (UTI)
- The recommendation to consider UTI as a cause of proteinuria in normotensive pregnant women is pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice.
- NICE guidance advises that asymptomatic bacteriuria (significant levels of bacteria greater than 105 colony forming units/mL urine without symptoms of UTI) is a risk factor for pyelonephritis and premature delivery [NICE, 2018].
- The recommendation to consider a working diagnosis of UTI and to request culture and sensitivity for pregnant women who have symptoms of UTI or those at risk of complications of UTI are based on what CKS considers to be good medical practice, and given that NHS England do not recommend routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in all pregnant women [NHS England, 2023].
Follow-up of women with 1+ proteinuria
- The recommendation to reassess women with isolated [1+] proteinuria in 1 week is based on expert opinion from PRECOG [PRECOG, 2004]. The expert opinion of a consultant obstetrician was also that 1 week is an appropriate follow-up period, as the risk of fulminating pre-eclampsia in women exhibiting isolated proteinuria is generally low [Hodson, 2023].
- Numerous observational studies have found that a considerable proportion of women with isolated significant proteinuria (up to 51% of women in the cohorts studied) will go on to develop pre-eclampsia [Morikawa, 2008; Sarno, 2015; Ekiz, 2016; Shinar, 2016; Yamada, 2016].
- One study of 938 pregnant women found that 20% of the 158 women who developed pre-eclampsia had initially exhibited isolated proteinuria [Yamada, 2016].
- One study of 195 singleton pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia found that pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were significantly worse in women who initially exhibited isolated proteinuria compared to those who initially exhibited hypertension [Sarno, 2015].
- One study of seventy-nine women who developed proteinuria and/or hypertension at and after 20 weeks of gestation also found that women exhibiting isolated proteinuria were statistically significantly more likely to develop pre-eclampsia than those with new onset gestational hypertension, and that 77% and 38% of women who developed proteinuria at less than 32 weeks and greater than 32 weeks, respectively, progressed to preeclampsia [Morikawa, 2008].
- A UK-wide obstetric survey reported that 7.5% of 214 women who developed eclamptic seizures had exhibited proteinuria without hypertension within 1 week of onset [Knight, 2007].
- In the absence of guidance to inform the management of normotensive women with isolated persistent [1+] proteinuria, CKS has pragmatically suggested that primary care physicians:
- Advise women to seek immediate medical attention if they develop symptoms of pre-eclampsia.
- Use albumin:creatinine ratio or protein:creatinine ratio to quantify the level of proteinuria.
- Seek specialist advice if proteinuria is significant — NICE advocates specialist assessment and enhanced monitoring for women with new onset gestational hypertension, and some studies have shown that the risk of pre-eclampsia is even higher for women with isolated significant proteinuria. Additionally, a proportion of women with persistent significant proteinuria will have an underlying renal problem which will require specialist assessment and management [Hodson, 2023].
Scenario: Postpartum follow-up for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
From age 13 years onwards (Female).
How should I follow up a woman with confirmed pre-eclampsia postpartum?
- Women with pre-eclampsia who have given birth should be transferred to primary care only if:
- There are no symptoms of pre-eclampsia.
- Blood pressure with or without treatment is 150/100 mmHg or lower.
- Blood test results are stable or improving.
- Women should be given an individual care plan on hospital discharge that includes:
- Who will provide follow-up care, including medical review if needed.
- Frequency of blood pressure monitoring.
- Thresholds for reducing or stopping treatment.
- Indications for referral to primary care for blood pressure review
- Advice on self-monitoring for symptoms of pre-eclampsia.
- All women with pre-eclampsia:
- Should be assessed for symptoms of pre-eclampsia (particularly severe headache and epigastric pain) at each consultation.
- Who are discharged to primary care with abnormal blood results should have repeat blood tests to measure platelet count, transaminases, and serum creatinine as clinically indicated, until results return to normal.
- Women with pre-eclampsia who did not take antihypertensive treatment:
- Should have their blood pressure measured at least once between days 3–5 after birth. If blood pressure is abnormal, it should then be measured on alternate days until it normalizes.
- Target blood pressure is lower than 140/90 mmHg.
- Antihypertensive treatment should be started if blood pressure is 150/100 mmHg or higher.
- Women with pre-eclampsia who took antihypertensive treatment:
- Should continue receiving antihypertensive treatment.
- Should have their blood pressure measured every 1–2 days for up to 2 weeks after transfer to community, care until treatment is no longer required and there is no hypertension.
- If blood pressure falls below 140/90 mmHg — a reduction in treatment can be considered.
- If blood pressure falls below 130/80 mmHg — treatment can be reduced.
- If antihypertensive treatment is required in the postnatal period, be aware that:
- Methyldopa taken during pregnancy should ideally be stopped within 2 days of birth, and an alternative antihypertensive provided, as postnatal methyldopa use may increase the risk of depression.
- Antihypertensives that are taken once daily should be used wherever possible.
- For women who are not breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed, hypertension should be managed as for a member of the general population. For further information, see the CKS topic on Hypertension.
- If the woman wishes to breastfeed, advise that their treatment can be adapted to accommodate breastfeeding, and that using antihypertensive medication is not a contraindication to breastfeeding.
- Enalapril should be offered first-line, with appropriate monitoring of maternal renal function and serum potassium.
- If the woman is of black African or Caribbean family origin, first-line treatment with nifedipine (or amlodipine if the woman has previously used this successfully) should be considered.
- Where possible, use of diuretics or angiotensin receptor blockers should be avoided in women who are breastfeeding or expressing milk.
- If blood pressure is not controlled with a single medicine, a combination of nifedipine (or amlodipine) and enalapril can be considered. If this combination is not tolerated or is ineffective, it may be appropriate to either add atenolol or labetalol to the combination treatment or swap one of the medicines being used for atenolol or labetalol. Seek specialist advice where there is uncertainty.
- As antihypertensives can pass (in small quantities) into breastmilk, women who are breastfeeding should be advised to monitor their babies for symptoms of hypotension, such as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries, or poor feeding.
- Women remaining on antihypertensive treatment should be offered a medical review in primary care or with a specialist 2 weeks after transfer to community care.
- A postnatal review 6–8 weeks after birth should be carried out in primary care or by a specialist:
- All women who have had pre-eclampsia should undergo medical review of their hypertension.
- A urinary reagent-strip test should be carried out. Women with [1+] proteinuria should be offered a further review in primary care or by a specialist three months after delivery to assess kidney function.
- If this review takes place in primary care, consider referring women with abnormal kidney function at three months postpartum for specialist kidney assessment. Note: the requirement for this will depend largely upon the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio. For further information, see the CKS topic on Chronic kidney disease.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on postpartum follow-up of women with pre-eclampsia are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS) guidelines Using ACE inhibitors during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023a], Using calcium-channel blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b] and Using beta-blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023c], and expert opinion published in narrative literature reviews [Wu, 2023].
Choice of antihypertensive in breastfeeding
- Recommendations regarding the different therapeutic options for treating hypertension in breastfeeding are provided in the NICE guideline [NICE, 2023].
- Medicines from different pharmacological classes may need to be used in combination [SPS, 2023a].
- Enalapril is the preferred angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor during breastfeeding as published evidence is available about its excretion into breast milk, it has been used therapeutically in infants, and it has the most favourable pharmacokinetics [SPS, 2023a].
- Nifedipine is a preferred choice due to very small amounts in breast milk and extensive experience of use during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b].
- Labetalol, metoprolol, and propranolol are the beta-blockers of choice during breastfeeding. Very small amounts get into breast milk, and they have shorter half-lives leading to a lower risk of accumulation in a breastfed infant. Labetalol and metoprolol also do not rely on excretion in the urine, again leading to less risk of accumulation [SPS, 2023c].
Monitoring
- Postpartum blood pressure is often higher than blood pressure during pregnancy, and a sustained risk of cerebrovascular haemorrhage exists in the postpartum period [Wu, 2023].
- Blood pressure is commonly highest three to five days after birth and should be measured at least once during this period [Wu, 2023].
- When discharged home, advise women to monitor their babies for drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries or poor feeding [NICE, 2023].
- Neonates and infants less than 2 months are at the most risk from the side-effects of ACE inhibitors, particularly hypotension, because they have underdeveloped clearance capacities, which means they can’t metabolise the medicines as effectively. As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023a].
- As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension, which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, looking pale, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023b].
- As a precaution, monitor the infants of women using beta-blockers whilst breastfeeding for signs of bradycardia or hypoglycaemia including drowsiness, lethargy, and poor feeding and inadequate weight gain. Hypoglycaemia may also manifest as jitteriness/ tremors, sweating, irritability, fast breathing, looking pale, and unusual cry [SPS, 2023c].
How should I follow up a woman with chronic hypertension postpartum?
- Note: antihypertensive treatment in the postnatal period will usually be initiated by a specialist before the woman is discharged from hospital. Further monitoring and management may take place in primary care under the terms of a shared-care arrangement.
- Measure blood pressure (this will usually be done by the community midwife after hospital discharge).
- Daily for the first 2 days postnatally.
- At least once between days 3–5 postnatally.
- As clinically indicated if the woman's antihypertensive treatment is changed postnatally.
- Continue antihypertensive treatment if required:
- Aim to keep blood pressure lower than 140/90 mmHg.
- Methyldopa taken during pregnancy should ideally be stopped within 2 days of birth, and an alternative antihypertensive provided, as postnatal methyldopa use may increase the risk of depression.
- Antihypertensives that are taken once daily should be used wherever possible.
- If the woman wishes to breastfeed, advise that their treatment can be adapted to accommodate breastfeeding, and that using antihypertensive medication is not a contraindication to breastfeeding.
- Enalapril should be offered first-line, with appropriate monitoring of maternal renal function and maternal serum potassium.
- If the woman is of black African or Caribbean family origin, first-line treatment with nifedipine (or amlodipine if the woman has previously used this successfully) should be considered.
- Where possible, the use of diuretics or angiotensin receptor blockers should be avoided in women who are breastfeeding or expressing milk.
- If blood pressure is not controlled with a single medicine, consider a combination of nifedipine (or amlodipine) and enalapril. If this combination is not tolerated or is ineffective, consider either adding atenolol or labetalol to the combination treatment or swapping one of the medicines being used for atenolol or labetalol. Seek specialist advice where there is uncertainty.
- When treating women with antihypertensive medication during the postnatal period, medicines that are taken once daily should be used wherever possible.
- As antihypertensives can pass (in small quantities) into breastmilk, women who are breastfeeding should be advised to monitor their babies for symptoms of hypotension, such as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries, or poor feeding.
- Reduce antihypertensive treatment if blood pressure falls below 130/80 mmHg.
- Review antihypertensive treatment 2 weeks postnatally.
- Ensure that women with chronic hypertension are offered a medical review 6–8 weeks after the birth either in primary care, or with a specialist as appropriate.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on postpartum follow-up of women with chronic hypertension are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS) guidelines Using ACE inhibitors during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023a], Using calcium-channel blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b] and Using beta-blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023c], and expert opinion published in narrative literature reviews [Wu, 2023].
Choice of antihypertensive in breastfeeding
- Recommendations regarding the different therapeutic options for treating hypertension in breastfeeding are provided in the NICE guideline [NICE, 2023].
- Medicines from different pharmacological classes may need to be used in combination [SPS, 2023a].
- Enalapril is the preferred angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor during breastfeeding as published evidence is available about its excretion into breast milk, it has been used therapeutically in infants, and it has the most favourable pharmacokinetics [SPS, 2023a].
- Nifedipine is a preferred choice due to very small amounts in breast milk and extensive experience of use during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b].
- Labetalol, metoprolol, and propranolol are the beta-blockers of choice during breastfeeding. Very small amounts get into breast milk, and they have shorter half-lives leading to a lower risk of accumulation in a breastfed infant. Labetalol and metoprolol also do not rely on excretion in the urine, again leading to less risk of accumulation [SPS, 2023c].
Monitoring
- Postpartum blood pressure is often higher than blood pressure during pregnancy, and a sustained risk of cerebrovascular haemorrhage exists in the postpartum period [Wu, 2023].
- Blood pressure is commonly highest three to five days after birth and should be measured at least once during this period [Wu, 2023].
- When discharged home, advise women to monitor their babies for drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries or poor feeding [NICE, 2023].
- Neonates and infants less than 2 months are at the most risk from the side-effects of ACE inhibitors, particularly hypotension, because they have underdeveloped clearance capacities, which means they can’t metabolise the medicines as effectively. As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023a].
- As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, looking pale, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023b].
- As a precaution, monitor the infants of women using beta-blockers whilst breastfeeding for signs of bradycardia or hypoglycaemia including drowsiness, lethargy, and poor feeding and inadequate weight gain. Hypoglycaemia may also manifest as jitteriness/ tremors, sweating, irritability, fast breathing, looking pale, and unusual cry [SPS, 2023c].
How should I follow up a woman with gestational hypertension postpartum?
- Most women with gestational hypertension will be followed up by the maternity unit after delivery until their blood pressure has returned to normal, or will be referred to a specialist if blood pressure remains elevated. Women then being transferred to community care should receive a care plan which outlines:
- Who will provide follow-up care, including medical review if needed.
- Frequency of blood pressure monitoring.
- Thresholds for reducing or stopping treatment.
- Indications for referral to primary care for blood pressure review.
- The woman's blood pressure should be measured:
- Daily for the first 2 days postnatally.
- At least once between days 3–5 postnatally.
- As clinically indicated if the woman's antihypertensive treatment is changed postnatally.
- If continued antihypertensive treatment is required:
- Target blood pressure is lower than 140/90 mmHg.
- Methyldopa taken during pregnancy should ideally be stopped within 2 days of birth, and an alternative antihypertensive provided, as postnatal methyldopa use may increase the risk of depression.
- Antihypertensives that are taken once daily should be used wherever possible.
- For women who are not breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed, hypertension should be managed as for a member of the general population. For further information, see the CKS topic on Hypertension.
- If the woman wishes to breastfeed, advise that their treatment can be adapted to accommodate breastfeeding, and that using antihypertensive medication is not a contraindication to breastfeeding.
- Enalapril should be offered first-line, with appropriate monitoring of maternal renal function and maternal serum potassium.
- If the woman is of black African or Caribbean family origin, first-line treatment with nifedipine (or amlodipine if the woman has previously used this successfully) should be considered.
- Where possible, use of diuretics or angiotensin receptor blockers should be avoided in women who are breastfeeding or expressing milk.
- If blood pressure is not controlled with a single medicine, consider a combination of nifedipine (or amlodipine) and enalapril. If this combination is not tolerated or is ineffective, consider either adding atenolol or labetalol to the combination treatment or swapping one of the medicines being used for atenolol or labetalol. Seek specialist advice where there is uncertainty.
- When treating women with antihypertensive medication during the postnatal period, medicines that are taken once daily should be used wherever possible.
- As antihypertensives can pass (in small quantities) into breastmilk, women who are breastfeeding should be advised to monitor their babies for symptoms of hypotension, such as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries, or poor feeding.
- Reduce antihypertensive treatment if blood pressure falls below 130/80 mmHg.
- For women with gestational hypertension who did not take antihypertensive treatment and have given birth, antihypertensive treatment should be started if blood pressure is 150/100 mmHg or higher.
- Women who remain on antihypertensive treatment postnatally should be offered a medical review in primary care, or with their specialist 2 weeks after transfer to community care.
- Ensure that women with gestational hypertension are offered a medical review 6–8 weeks after the birth either in primary care, or with a specialist as appropriate.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on postpartum follow-up of women with chronic hypertension are based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice Guideline Gestational Hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], the Specialist Pharmacy Service (SPS) guidelines Using ACE inhibitors during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023a], Using calcium-channel blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b] and Using beta-blockers during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023c], and expert opinion published in narrative literature reviews [Wu, 2023].
Target blood pressure
- NICE makes no explicit recommendations relating to target blood pressure in women with persisting gestational hypertension. CKS has therefore extrapolated NICE's advice for the postnatal management of women with chronic hypertension [NICE, 2023].
- The BMJ guideline states that women with gestational hypertension who required antihypertensive therapy before delivery should have their antihypertensive treatment reduced when their blood pressure falls below 130/80 mmHg [BMJ Best Practice, 2024].
Choice of antihypertensive in breastfeeding
- Recommendations regarding the different therapeutic options for treating hypertension in breastfeeding are provided in the NICE guideline [NICE, 2023].
- Medicines from different pharmacological classes may need to be used in combination [SPS, 2023a].
- Enalapril is the preferred angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor during breastfeeding as published evidence is available about its excretion into breast milk, it has been used therapeutically in infants, and it has the most favourable pharmacokinetics [SPS, 2023a].
- Nifedipine is a preferred choice due to very small amounts in breast milk and extensive experience of use during breastfeeding [SPS, 2023b].
- Labetalol, metoprolol, and propranolol are the beta-blockers of choice during breastfeeding. Very small amounts get into breast milk, and they have shorter half-lives leading to a lower risk of accumulation in a breastfed infant. Labetalol and metoprolol also do not rely on excretion in the urine, again leading to less risk of accumulation [SPS, 2023c].
Monitoring
- Postpartum blood pressure is often higher than blood pressure during pregnancy, and a sustained risk of cerebrovascular haemorrhage exists in the postpartum period [Wu, 2023].
- Blood pressure is commonly highest three to five days after birth and should be measured at least once during this period [Wu, 2023].
- When discharged home, advise women to monitor their babies for drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, cold peripheries or poor feeding [NICE, 2023].
- Neonates and infants less than 2 months are at the most risk from the side-effects of ACE inhibitors, particularly hypotension, because they have underdeveloped clearance capacities, which means they can’t metabolise the medicines as effectively. As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, pallor, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023a].
- As a precaution, monitor the infant for hypotension which may manifest as drowsiness, lethargy, looking pale, poor feeding and inadequate weight gain [SPS, 2023b].
- As a precaution, monitor the infants of women using beta-blockers whilst breastfeeding for signs of bradycardia or hypoglycaemia including drowsiness, lethargy, and poor feeding and inadequate weight gain. Hypoglycaemia may also manifest as jitteriness/ tremors, sweating, irritability, fast breathing, looking pale, and unusual cry [SPS, 2023c].
How should I follow up a woman with proteinuria and no hypertension?
- At postnatal review 6–8 weeks after birth, for all women with unexplained isolated proteinuria during pregnancy who remained normotensive.
- A urinary reagent-strip test should be carried out. Women with [1+] proteinuria should be offered a further review in primary care or by a specialist 3 months after delivery to assess kidney function.
- If this review takes place in primary care, assess renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and quantification of proteinuria. For further information, see the CKS topic on Chronic kidney disease.
- Consider referring women with an abnormal renal function assessment at 3 months for specialist assessment.
- A urinary reagent-strip test should be carried out. Women with [1+] proteinuria should be offered a further review in primary care or by a specialist 3 months after delivery to assess kidney function.
Basis for recommendation
In the absence of specific guidance from NICE relating to postpartum follow-up of women with proteinuria but no hypertension, CKS sought advice from a consultant obstetrician who advised that it is standard practice to continue monitoring proteinuria post-partum and if this persists, to consider seeking advice from a renal specialist depending on the urinary protein:creatinine ratio, as a proportion of women with these clinical signs will have underlying renal disease unrelated to pregnancy [Hodson, 2023]. The information about timing of follow-up and the specific assessments required at each time point was extrapolated from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management relating to postpartum monitoring of renal function in women with pre-eclampsia [NICE, 2023].
How should I manage a woman with postpartum pre-eclampsia or eclampsia?
- All women with suspected postpartum pre-eclampsia or eclampsia should be admitted to hospital for immediate assessment.
- Consider the possibility of imminent pre-eclampsia or eclampsia in a woman up to 4 weeks postpartum (even if she has not had previous hypertension or pre-eclampsia) if she develops any of the following:
- Severe headaches (increasing frequency unrelieved by regular analgesics).
- Visual problems, such as blurred vision, flashing lights, double vision, or floating spots.
- Persistent new epigastric pain or pain in the right upper quadrant.
- Vomiting.
- Hypertension.
- Proteinuria.
- Breathlessness due to pulmonary oedema.
- Sudden swelling of the face, hands, or feet.
- Consider the possibility of eclampsia in any woman who has a seizure within 4 weeks of delivery.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on the management of suspected postpartum pre-eclampsia or eclampsia are largely based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023], guidance from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia [ACOG, 2020], and an expert opinion narrative review article [Hauspurg, 2022].
Immediate admission to hospital
- The recommendation to arrange hospital admission for women with suspected postpartum pre-eclampsia or eclampsia is pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Importance of considering the possibility of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia even if no previous hypertension or pre-eclampsia
- Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia may both present for the first time after delivery [Hauspurg, 2022].
- A prospective descriptive study of every case of eclampsia in the UK in 2005–2006 found that 36% of cases occurred postpartum [Knight, 2007]. Because these cases were reported from obstetric units, this may have led to an underestimation of postpartum cases.
Possibility of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia up to 4 weeks postpartum
- A multi-centre, retrospective analysis of data from 29 women with postpartum eclampsia found that 23 (79%) had late-onset eclampsia (developing more than 48 hours after delivery) [Chames, 2002].
- In a multi-centre, retrospective analysis that included 151 women readmitted to hospital with postpartum eclampsia, the average time from delivery to readmission was 7 days and ranged from 1–24 days [Matthys, 2004].
Possibility of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia if the woman develops typical symptoms
- In a multi-centre, retrospective analysis of data from 89 women with eclampsia, 21/29 women with postpartum eclampsia had at least one prodromal symptom that heralded the onset of eclampsia: 20 women had headache, 10 women had vision changes, 5 women had nausea or vomiting, and 2 women had epigastric pain [Chames, 2002].
- Case studies have shown that acute severe headache, vision disturbances, and gastrointestinal symptoms may herald impending postpartum eclampsia [Veltkamp, 2000; Dziewas, 2002; Mathew, 2003; Graeber, 2005; Munjuluri, 2005].
- A case-control study of 53 women admitted in the postpartum period found that headache, development of a blind spot, cortical blindness, malaise, nausea, and vomiting were more likely to occur in women with postpartum severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia than in women with intrapartum pre-eclampsia [Atterbury, 1998].
Possibility of eclampsia in any woman who has a seizure within 4 weeks postpartum
- Case studies of three women report eclampsia developing without preceding hypertension or proteinuria up to four weeks after delivery [Dziewas, 2002].
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Aspirin
For detailed information on prescribing low-dose aspirin, see the CKS topic on Antiplatelet treatment.
Labetalol
Contraindications and cautions
- Labetalol is not specifically licensed for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.
Labetalol should not be prescribed to people with:
- Asthma or history of bronchospasm or chronic obstructive airways disease.
- Uncontrolled heart failure.
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Sick sinus syndrome (including sino-atrial block, second- or third-degree heart block).
- Prinzmetal's angina.
- Phaeochromocytoma.
- Metabolic acidosis.
- Marked bradycardia (less than 45-50 bpm).
- Hypotension.
- Severe peripheral circulatory disorders (Raynaud's disease and intermittent claudication).
Labetalol should be used with caution in people with:
- Poor cardiac reserve.
- Peripheral circulatory disorders (Raynaud's disease and intermittent claudication).
- Diabetes mellitus.
- Psoriasis.
- History of hypersensitivity to allergens.
- Myasthenia gravis.
- Portal hypertension — risk of deterioration in liver function.
- Renal impairment — dose reduction should be considered.
- Hepatic impairment — there have been rare reports of (usually reversible) severe hepatocellular injury with labetalol after both short and long term treatment. Liver function tests should be done at the first sign or symptom of liver dysfunction. If there is laboratory evidence of liver injury or the person is jaundiced, labetalol should be stopped and not re-started.
- Ischaemic heart disease and first degree atrioventricular (AV) block — the course of labetalol should not be interrupted or discontinued abruptly.
Adverse effects
Adverse effects of labetalol include:
- Neurological — tiredness, weakness, headache, confusion, and visual impairment.
- Skin — rashes, tingling scalp, nipple pain, and Raynaud's phenomenon, and rarely lichenoid rash.
- Gastrointestinal — epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and liver damage.
- Urological — difficulty in micturition.
- Neuropsychiatric — depressed mood and sleep disorders.
- Hepatic — Raised liver function tests.
- Other — dyspnoea, postural hypotension, nasal congestion, and sweating.
Drug interactions
Concomitant use of labetalol is contraindicated with:
- Calcium antagonists such as verapamil and to a lesser extent diltiazem — may reduce cardiac contractility and atrioventricular conduction.
- Digitalis glycosides — may increase cardiac atrioventricular conduction time.
- Clonidine — beta-blocker use increases the risk of rebound hypertension.
- Monoamineoxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) — except MOA-B inhibitors.
Combinations requiring caution include:
- Class I anti-arrhythmic agents, for example disopyramide, quinidine; and the class III anti-arrhythmic drug amiodarone — may have potentiating effects on atrial conduction time and induce negative inotropic effect.
- Insulin and oral hypoglycaemic drugs — may intensify the blood-sugar lowering effect, especially of non-selective beta-blockers. Beta blockade may prevent the appearance of signs of hypoglycaemia.
- Cimetidine and hydralazine — may increase the bioavailability of labetalol.
- Dihydropyridine derivates such as nifedipine — may increase the risk of hypotension. In people with latent cardiac insufficiency, treatment with beta-blockers may lead to cardiac failure.
- Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-inhibiting drugs — may decrease the hypotensive effect of beta-blockers.
- Sympathomimetic agents (for example dopamine) — may counteract the effect of beta-blockers.
- Tricyclic antidepressants — may increase the blood pressure lowering effect of labetalol and may increase the incidence of tremor.
- Barbiturates, phenothiazines or other antihypertensive agents — may increase the blood pressure lowering effect of labetalol.
- NSAIDs, corticosteroids, oestrogens and progesterones — may antagonize the hypotensive effects of labetalol.
- Mefloquine or quinine — may increase the risk of bradycardia.
Dosing information
- Start with a dose of 100 mg labetalol twice a day.
- Increase the dose at fortnightly intervals if needed and tolerated.
- Usual dose 200 mg twice daily, increased if necessary up to 800 mg daily in 2 divided doses, to be taken with food, higher doses to be given in 3 to 4 divided doses.
- The maximum recommended dose is 2400 mg daily.
Methyldopa
Contraindications and cautions
- Methyldopa is not specifically licensed for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. The manufacturer states that there is no obvious teratogenic effect of methyldopa, but use should be reserved for those in whom the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks.
Methyldopa should not be prescribed to people with:
- Active hepatic disease, such as acute hepatitis or active cirrhosis.
- Depression.
- Phaeochromocytoma or paraganglioma.
- Acute porphyria.
Methyldopa should be used with caution in people with:
- History of hepatic disease or renal impairment.
Adverse effects
Adverse effects of methyldopa include:
- Cardiac — bradycardia, aggravation of angina pectoris, myocarditis, and pericarditis.
- Haematological — haemolytic anaemia, bone marrow depression, leukopenia, granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and eosinophilia.
- Neurological — sedation (usually transient), headache, paraesthesia, parkinsonism, Bell's palsy, involuntary choreoathetotic movements, impaired mental acuity, dizziness, lightheadedness, symptoms of cerebrovascular insufficiency, asthenia, and weakness.
- Gastrointestinal — gastrointestinal disorders, dry mouth, sore or 'black' tongue, pancreatitis, hepatitis, and jaundice.
- Skin — rashes (including toxic epidermal necrolysis), lupus-like syndrome, angioedema, and urticaria.
- Neuropsychiatric — nightmares, reversible mild psychoses, and depression.
- Endocrine — hyperprolactinaemia, gynaecomastia, amenorrhoea, and lactation.
- Other — hepatic disorders, prolonged carotid sinus hypersensitivity, nasal stuffiness, arthralgia, myalgia, sialadenitis, orthostatic hypotension, oedema (and weight gain), fever, and decreased libido.
Drug interactions
Combinations requiring caution include:
- Lithium — when methyldopa and lithium are given concomitantly the person should be monitored carefully for symptoms of lithium toxicity such as diarrhoea, abdominal pains, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, weakness, tremor, ataxia, and slurred speech.
- If lithium toxicity is suspected, do an urgent lithium level and seek specialist advice.
- Other antihypertensives — potentiation of antihypertensive action may occur.
- Sympathomimetics (for example dopamine), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and tricyclic antidepressants — may reduce the antihypertensive effect of methyldopa.
- Phenothiazines — may have additive hypotensive effects but can also reduce the antihypertensive effect of methyldopa.
- Iron — may decrease the bioavailability of methyldopa reducing its effect on blood pressure control.
Dosing information
- Start with a dose of 250 mg 2 to 3 times a day.
- If required and tolerated, increase the dose gradually at intervals of at least 2 days.
- Maximum dose is 3000 mg daily.
Nifedipine
Contraindications and cautions
- Nifedipine is not specifically licensed for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.
Nifedipine should not be prescribed to people with:
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Clinically significant aortic stenosis.
- Unstable or acute angina.
- Recent history (within 4 weeks) of myocardial infarction.
- Inflammatory bowel disease.
Nifedipine should be used with caution in people with:
- Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg).
- Hepatic impairment.
- Poor cardiac reserve.
- Diabetes mellitus — may require adjustment of diabetes treatment as nifedipine can affect blood sugar.
- A history of gastro-intestinal obstruction, oesophageal obstruction, or any degree of decreased lumen diameter of the gastrointestinal tract.
- Significantly impaired left ventricular function (where heart failure deterioration has been observed).
Adverse effects
Adverse effects of nifedipine include:
- Neurological — headache, migraine, paraesthesia, tremor, asthenia, vertigo, and visual disturbance.
- Cardiac — vasodilation, hypotension, palpitations, dizziness, tachycardia, and syncope.
- Gastrointestinal — constipation and gastrointestinal disturbance.
- Respiratory — dyspnoea.
- Neuropsychiatric — anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance.
- Urological — polyuria, dysuria, and nocturia.
- Other — oedema, lethargy, chills, nasal congestion, epistaxis, myalgia, joint swelling, sweating, rashes, and dry mouth.
Drug interactions
Concomitant use of nifedipine is contraindicated with:
- Rifampicin — this attenuates the effect of nifedipine.
Drugs that should be co-administered with caution include:
- Other antihypertensives — nifedipine may increase their blood pressure-lowering effect.
- Beta blockers — deterioration of heart failure has been observed in isolated cases.
- Digoxin — may lead to reduced digoxin clearance. The person should therefore be monitored for symptoms of digoxin toxicity such as confusion, nausea, anorexia, or disturbance of colour vision.
- If digoxin toxicity is suspected, measure serum digoxin levels and seek specialist advice if necessary.
- Cytochrome P450 inhibitors including macrolide antibiotics (such as erythromycin), HIV protease inhibitors (such as ritonavir), azole antimycotics (such as ketoconazole), fluoxetine, nefazodone, quinupristin/dalfopristin, cisapride, valproic acid, cimetidine, diltiazem, and grapefruit juice — can lead to increased plasma concentration of nifedipine.
- Cytochrome P450 inducers such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital — can lead to decreased plasma concentration of nifedipine.
- Quinidine — co-administration with nifedipine may lower plasma quinidine levels, and after discontinuation of nifedipine, an increase in plasma quinidine levels may be observed.
- Tacrolimus — co-administration with nifedipine may result in increased plasma tacrolimus levels.
Dosing information
- A modified-release preparation should be used and the same brand prescribed for the duration of treatment to ensure consistent bioavailability.
- Dosages are as recommended for non-pregnant people, and will depend on the brand used.
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NICE, 2023] and Antenatal care [NG201] [NICE, 2021], the PRECOG guideline Pre-eclampsia community guideline [PRECOG, 2004], the ACOG guideline Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222 [ACOG, 2020], the BMJ Best Practice guideline Gestational hypertension [BMJ Best Practice, 2024], and expert opinion narrative review articles [Garovic, 2022; Kametas, 2022; Metoki, 2022; Wu, 2023]. The rationale for individual recommendations is outlined in the relevant basis for recommendation sections of the topic. The evidence for specialist management strategies is not discussed as they are beyond the scope of this CKS topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines and systematic reviews on primary care management of hypertension in pregnancy.
Search dates
September 2019 - November 2024
Key search terms
The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCOhost MEDLINE (searched 13th September 2019). These were combined with filters to identify guidelines, systematic reviews and primary care relevant literature in EBSCOhost MEDLINE. The strategy was adapted for The Cochrane Library databases.
S11 S1 OR S4 OR S5 OR S6 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10
S10 AB HELLP OR TI HELLP
S9 AB ( (proteinuria N2 (pregna* or gestation* or postpartum or post-partum or antenatal)) ) OR TI ( (proteinuria N2 (pregna* or gestation* or postpartum or post-partum or antenatal)) )
S8 S3 AND S7
S7 (MH "Proteinuria+")
S6 AB ( (preclampsia or pre-eclampsia or eclampsia) ) OR TI ( (preclampsia or pre-eclampsia or eclampsia) )
S5 AB ( ((hypertensi*) N2 (pregnan* or gestation* or postpartum or post-partum or antenatal)) ) OR TI ( ((hypertensi*) N2 (pregnan* or gestation* or postpartum or post-partum or antenatal)) )
S4 S2 AND S3
S3 (MH "Pregnancy+")
S2 (MH "Hypertension+")
S1 (MH "Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced+")
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- ACOG (2020) Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstetrics and Gynecology 135(6), e237-e260. [Abstract]
- Al Khalaf, S., Chappell, L.C., Khashan, A.S., et al. (2023) Association between chronic hypertension and the risk of 12 cardiovascular diseases among parous women: The role of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hypertension 80(7), 1427-1438. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Atterbury, J.L., Groome, L.J., Hoff, C. and Yarnell, J.A. (1998) Clinical presentation of women readmitted with postpartum severe preeclampsia or eclampsia. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 27(2), 134-141. [Abstract]
- Bellamy, L., Casas, J.P., Hingorani, A.D. and Williams, D.J. (2007) Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 335(7627), 974. [Abstract]
- BMJ Best Practice (2024) Gestational hypertension. BMJ Publishing Group. https://bestpractice.bmj.com
- BNF (2025) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Bramham, K., Parnell, B., Nelson-Piercy, C., et al. (2014) Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 348, g2301. [Abstract]
- Chames, M.C., Livingston, J.C., Ivester, T.S., et al. (2002) Late postpartum eclampsia: a preventable disease? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186(6), 1174-1177. [Abstract]
- Dziewas, R., Stogbauer, F., Freund, M., et al. (2002) Late onset postpartum eclampsia: a rare and difficult diagnosis. Journal of Neurology 249(9), 1287-1291. [Abstract]
- Ekiz, A., Kaya, B., Polat, I., et al. (2016) The outcome of pregnancy with new onset proteinuria without hypertension: retrospective observational study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Medicine 29(11), 1765-1769. [Abstract]
- EMC (2020) SPC for adalat LA 30 mg prolonged-release tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2022) SPC for methyldopa tablets 250 mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2024) SPC for labetalol 100 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Ferrer, R.L., Sibai, B.M., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2000) Management of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy: a review. Obstetrics & Gynecology 96(5 Pt 2), 849-860. [Abstract]
- Garovic, V.D., Dechend, R., Easterling, T., et al. (2022) Hypertension in pregnancy, diagnosis, blood pressure goals, and pharmacotherapy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 79(2), e21-e41. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Graeber, B., Vanderwal, T., Stiller, R.J. and Werdmann, M.J. (2005) Late postpartum eclampsia as an obstetric complication seen in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 23(2), 168-170. [Abstract]
- Hauspurg, A. and Jeyabalan, A. (2022) Postpartum preeclampsia or eclampsia: defining its place and management among the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 226(2S), S1211-S1221. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Hodson (2023)
Personal communication. Consultant Obstetrician, Newcastle Hospitals and Head of UK Teratology Information Service. - Kametas, N.A., Nzelu, D. and Nicolaides, K.H. (2022) Chronic hypertension and superimposed preeclampsia: screening and diagnosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 226(2S), S1182-S1195. [Abstract]
- Knight, M. (2007) Eclampsia in the United Kingdom 2005. BJOG 114(9), 1072-1078. [Abstract]
- Lisonkova, S. and Jospeh, K. (2013) Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early-versus late-onset disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 209(6), 544. e1-12. [Abstract]
- Mathew, R., Raj, R.S. and Sudha, P. (2003) Late postpartum eclampsia without prodroma. Neurology India 51(4), 539-540. [Abstract]
- Matthys, L.A., Coppage, K.H., Lambers, D.S., et al. (2004) Delayed postpartum preeclampsia: an experience of 151 cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 190(5), 1464-1466. [Abstract]
- MBBRACE-UK (2023) Saving lives, improving mother's care: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity, 2019-21. Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- McDonald, S.D., Malinowski, A., Zhou, Q., et al. (2008) Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. American Heart Journal 156(5), 918-30. [Abstract]
- Metoki, H., Iwama, N., Hamada, H., et al. (2022) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension Research 45(8), 1298-1309. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Morikawa, M., Yamada, T., Yamada, T., et al. (2008) Pregnancy outcome of women who developed proteinuria in the absence of hypertension after mid-gestation. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 36(5), 419-424. [Abstract]
- Munjuluri, N., Lipman, M., Valentine, A., et al. (2005) Postpartum eclampsia of late onset. BMJ 331(7524), 1070-1071. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- National High Blood Pressure Education Program (2000) Working group report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: National High Blood Pressure Education Program, S1-S22.
- NHS England (2023) NHS England Saving babies’ lives: version 3 care bundle. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- NHS England (2024) NHS Maternity Statistics, England, 2023-24. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2018) Urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2019) QS 35: Hypertension in pregnancy. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2021) Antenatal care [NG201]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2023) Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management [NG133]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- PHE (2020) Diagnosis of urinary tract infections: quick reference tool for primary care. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- PRECOG (2004) Pre-eclampsia community guideline. Action On Pre-Eclampsia. http://www.apec.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Rudra, P., Basak, S., Patil, D. and Latoo, M. (2011) Recent advances in management of pre-eclampsia. British Journal of Medical Practitioners 4(3), a433. [Abstract]
- Sarno, L., Maruotti, G.M., Saccone, G., et al. (2015) Pregnancy outcome in proteinuria-onset and hypertension-onset preeclampsia. Hypertension in Pregnancy. 34(3), 284-290. [Abstract]
- Shinar, S., Asher-Landsberg, J., Schwartz, A., et al. (2016) Isolated proteinuria is a risk factor for pre-eclampsia: a retrospective analysis of the maternal and neonatal outcomes in women presenting with isolated gestational proteinuria. Journal of Perinatology 36(1), 25-29. [Abstract]
- SPS (2023a) Using ACE inhibitors during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- SPS (2023b) Using calcium-channel blockers during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- SPS (2023c) Using beta-blockers during breastfeeding. Specialist Pharmacy Service. https://www.sps.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKOSS (2023) HELLP Syndrome. UK Obstetric Surveillance System. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2021a) Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2021b) Use of Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2023) Use of calcium channel blockers in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2024a) Use of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs (beta-blockers) in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- UKTIS (2024b) Use of methyldopa in pregnancy. UK Teratology Information Service. https://www.uktis.org [Free Full-text]
- Veltkamp, R., Kupsch, A., Polasek, J., et al. (2000) Late onset postpartum eclampsia without pre-eclamptic prodromi: clinical and neuroradiological presentation in two patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 69(6), 824-827. [Abstract]
- Vikse, B.E., Irgens, L.M., Leivestad, T., et al. (2008) Preeclampsia and the risk of end-stage renal disease. New England Journal of Medicine 359(8), 800-809. [Abstract]
- Williams, D. and Craft, N. (2012) Pre-eclampsia. BMJ 345, e4437. [Abstract]
- Wu, P., Green, M. and Myers, J.E. (2023) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. BMJ 381, e071653. [Abstract]
- Yamada, T., Obata-Yasuoka, M., Hamada, H., et al. (2016) Isolated gestational proteinuria preceding the diagnosis of preeclampsia - an observational study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95(9), 1048-1054. [Abstract]