This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Infections and infestations Skin and nail

Fungal nail infection

Last revised in August 2023

Fungal nail infection (onychomycosis) can involve the nail plate, nail bed, and/or the root of the nail. It affects toenails more frequently than the

Fungal nail infection: Summary

  • Fungal nail infection (onychomycosis) can involve any part of the nail, or the entire nail unit, including the nail plate, nail bed, and root of the nail.
    • The nail unit may discolour, the nail plate may distort, and the nail bed and adjacent tissue may thicken.
    • Toenails are seven times more likely to be affected than fingernails.
  • Infection is caused by dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte moulds and yeasts such as Candida species. Dermatophytes are responsible for about 90% of cases.
  • Fungal nail infection is more common in older people and athletes, and is rare in children.
  • Risk factors for infection include concomitant fungal skin infection; psoriasis; diabetes mellitus; peripheral arterial disease; immunocompromised states; repeated nail trauma; and occlusive footwear.
  • Fungal nail infection should be suspected if:
    • The nail looks abnormal and is discoloured.
    • There are white or yellow streaks along one side of the nail.
    • There is a thickening of the nail; white or yellow spots; or complete destruction of the nail.
    • There is associated paronychia, which may suggest Candida infection.
  • Assessment of suspected fungal nail infection should include:
    • Asking about symptoms such as pain and discomfort; difficulty wearing footwear and walking; psychosocial impact; any co-morbidities or risk factors for infection; and any family or household members affected.
    • Classifying the type of onychomycosis, if possible.
    • Examining for fungal skin infection at other sites.
    • Arranging nail clippings and/or scrapings for fungal microscopy and culture to confirm the diagnosis and underlying cause, if the person wishes to start antifungal treatment.
  • Initial management of fungal nail infection should include advice on:
    • Self-care strategies, such as keeping nails short; wearing non-occlusive footwear; and treating associated tinea pedis.
    • The option of topical antifungal treatment, such as amorolfine nail lacquer, only if there is early, limited, or superficial dermatophyte or Candida nail infection.
  • If initial measures are not successful or appropriate, management with oral antifungal agents may be indicated.
    • Terbinafine may be used first-line for confirmed dermatophyte infection.
    • Itraconazole or fluconazole may be used first-line for confirmed Candida or non-dermatophyte infection (off-label).
    • Nail regrowth should be assessed 3–6 months after the start of treatment.
  • If there are signs of treatment failure, the following measures can be considered:
    • Managing any underlying cause.
    • Re-sampling for nail clippings and/or scrapings for fungal microscopy and culture. 
    • Combination treatment with a topical and oral antifungal agent.
  • Referral to a podiatrist may be considered if:
    • Thickened toenails cause discomfort when walking.
    • There is nail trauma due to the person's footwear.
    • Deformed toenails are traumatizing adjacent toes.
  • Referral to a dermatologist may be considered if:
    • Oral antifungal treatment is being considered for a child.
    • The diagnosis is uncertain.
    • Treatment in primary care is unsuccessful.
    • There is co-existent nail disease, such as psoriasis or lichen planus.
    • The person is immunocompromised, depending on clinical judgement.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 12 years onwards.

This CKS topic covers the diagnosis and management of fungal infection of the nails in young people and adults caused by moulds (dermatophytes and non-dermatophytes) and yeasts (usually Candida species).

This CKS topic does not cover the management of fungal infections at other body sites, or the management of other nail conditions.

There are separate CKS topics on Candida - skin, Fungal skin infection - body and groin, Fungal skin infection - foot, Fungal skin infection - scalp, and Paronychia - acute.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

August 2023 — minor update. Information on hepatic monitoring has been clarified.

Previous changes

April 2023 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2023 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes were made to recommendations. 

March 2018 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2018 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring. Complications and Prognosis nodes have been added to the Background information section. The management recommendations have been updated in line with the current literature. The Prescribing Information section has been updated and expanded in line with current CKS style.

September 2014 — minor update. Update to the prescribing information text on terbinafine, to make it consistent across CKS topics. Recommendations to monitor liver function tests before and during treatment with terbinafine, and to reduce the dose of terbinafine in people with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 have been added.

September 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in July 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There are no changes to the recommendations.

February 2012 — minor error corrected in prescribing information for itraconazole and terbinafine. 

January to May 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are only minor changes to the recommendations. Continuous itraconazole and topical tioconazole are no longer recommended because alternative treatments are more practical.

April 2008 — minor update to the text for oral ketoconazole which now reflects the most recent Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidance.

March 2008 — minor update. New text inserted regarding rare cases of changes in the international normalized ratio (INR) when warfarin and oral terbinafine have been given concomitantly. 

July 2006 — minor update. Amorolfine is now available to buy over-the-counter and the text has been amended to reflect this. 

October to December 2005 — written. Validated in March 2006 and issued in May 2006. This guidance superseded the CKS guidance on Fungal (dermatophyte) infections — skin and nails and Candida — skin and nails, which were withdrawn.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 March 2023.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 March 2023.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 March 2023.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 March 2023.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 March 2023.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 March 2023.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 March 2023.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 March 2023.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Make an accurate assessment and diagnosis of fungal nail infections.
  • Offer management in primary care including self-care or antifungal drug treatment, if appropriate.
  • Arrange referral to a specialist if appropriate.
  • Provide information and advice about the condition.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is it?

  • Fungal nail infection (onychomycosis) can involve any part of the nail, or the entire nail unit, including the nail plate, nail bed, and root of the nail.
    • As the infection progresses, the nail unit may discolour, the nail plate may distort, and the nail bed and adjacent tissue may thicken.
    • The toenails are seven times more likely to be affected than the fingernails. This may be due to their slower growth, reduced blood supply, and dark moist environmental conditions.
    • 'Tinea unguium' describes infection caused by dermatophyte fungi, which are responsible for about 90% of cases of onychomycosis.

[Ameen, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; PCDS, 2022]

What causes it?

  • The fungal organisms responsible for nail infection are dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte moulds, and yeasts such as Candida species.
    • Dermatophyte fungal infection is responsible for 85–90% of onychomycosis cases [Jazdarehee, 2022].
      • About 90% of dermatophyte infections are caused by Trichophyton rubrum, followed by a complex of Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale [Ameen, 2014].
    • Non-dermatophyte moulds such as Scopulariopsis, Scytalidium, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Acremonium species are responsible for about 2–5% of cases of toenail onychomycosis. Fingernails are rarely affected [Ameen, 2014; UKHSA, 2017].
      • These are rare causes of nail infection, as they usually colonize nails as a secondary infection following nail trauma or an underlying dermatophyte infection.
    • Infection by Candida species accounts for 5–10% of onychomycosis cases [Eisman, 2014; UKHSA, 2017].
      • Infection affects fingernails much more commonly than toenails.
      • About 50% of cases of fingernail onychomycosis are due to yeasts such as Candida albicans.

What are the risk factors?

  • Risk factors for the development or recurrence of a fungal nail infection include:
    • Family history [Tosti, 2016].
    • Older age [BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Gupta, 2022].
    • Concomitant fungal skin infection — dermatophyte infection of the toenails is usually secondary to tinea pedis; fingernail infection is usually secondary to tinea manuum, tinea capitis, or tinea corporis [Ameen, 2014].
    • Psoriasis — a comprehensive review found people with psoriasis were almost twice as likely to have fungal nail infection than matched controls [Kyriakou, 2022].
    • Co-morbid conditions — such as people with diabetes mellitus (almost three times more likely to be affected than non-diabetics) [Gupta, 2015a], peripheral arterial disease, Raynaud's phenomenon, and people who are immunocompromised [Ameen, 2014; Piraccini, 2022].
    • Exposure within a household environment is an important source of transmission [Jazdarehee, 2022].
    • Ill-fitting or occlusive footwear or exposure to warm damp environments such as gymnasiums or swimming pools [Ameen, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].

How common is it?

  • Reported mean prevalence in Europe and the US varies between 4.3-8.9% [Gregoriou, 2022].
  • In the US point prevalence of fungal nail infection is estimated as 13.8% in adults [Frazier, 2021].
  • Athletes are 2.5 times more likely to be affected [Daggett, 2019].
  • Men are more commonly affected than women [Ameen, 2014].
  • Fungal nail infection is more common in older people and is rare in children [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • About 20% of people aged over 60 years, and up to 50% of people aged over 70 years, are affected [Gupta, 2022]. This may be related to the slower rates of nail growth and the increased incidence of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, and immunological disorders in this age group.
    • A 2022 systematic review reported prevalence in children to be between 0-7.66% [Vestergaard-Jensen, 2022].

What are the complications?

  • Possible complications of a fungal nail infection include:
    • Psychological distress and reduced self-esteem.
    • Impaired or lost tactile function with fingernail involvement.
    • Difficulties walking, exercising, and fitting shoes with toenail involvement.
    • Secondary fungal infection — infected nails may act as a reservoir with the potential for spread to other body sites. See the CKS topics on Fungal skin infection - body and groin, Fungal skin infection - foot, and Fungal skin infection - scalp for more information.
    • Secondary bacterial infection and cellulitis — especially in older people and those with co-morbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, or Raynaud's phenomenon. See the CKS topic on Cellulitis - acute for more information.
    • Injury to the surrounding skin — caused by nails with thick, sharp edges. May predispose to foot ulcers and osteomyelitis, especially in people with diabetes mellitus.
    • Dermatophytoma — a granulated mass of hyphae and necrotic keratin below the nail plate, caused by severe onychomycosis and/or extensive nail thickening.
    • Acting as a source of infection for family and household members, if untreated.

[Ameen, 2014; Feng, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]

What is the prognosis?

The prognosis of fungal nail infection is variable in the literature due to different study outcome measures and management regimens.

  • Infection is not known to clear spontaneously without antifungal treatment [Tosti, 2016].
  • The risk of recurrence of fungal nail infection varies widely in the literature, and has been estimated to range between 20–50% due to reinfection or lack of response to treatment [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
  • It is recognised that only 30–60% of people will achieve a complete cure (mycologic and clinical) even with systemic treatment [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017].
  • Factors that may indicate a poor prognosis include [Ameen, 2014]:
    • Lateral edge nail involvement.
    • More than 50% nail involvement.
    • Involvement of the nail matrix; 'spikes' extending from distal to proximal nail.
    • Nail thickness of more than 2 mm.
    • Associated paronychia and/or dermatophytoma.
    • Slow-growing nail.
    • Co-morbid conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, or immunosuppression.
    • Drug-resistant or multiple organisms; non-adherence to self-care advice or medication.

Diagnosis of fungal nail infection

When should I suspect fungal nail infection?

Be aware that fungal nail infection commonly co-exists with other nail disorders that may present similarly. Suspect a diagnosis of fungal infection clinically if:

  • The nail looks abnormal and is discoloured. A single nail, several nails, or rarely all nails may be affected. The first and fifth toenails are most commonly involved. Fingernail infection is usually unilateral. Different presentations of onychomycosis include:
    • Superficial white — small flaky white patches and pits on the top of the nail plate; the nail becomes roughened and friable as the infection spreads to the deeper layers of the nail. Most common in children.
    • Distal — begins distally and spreads to the nail plate and nail bed. The end of the nail is lifted up, and the free edge erodes. As the infection spreads proximally, it may cause linear channels or 'spikes'. May be associated with Candida infection.
    • Lateral — white or yellow opaque streaks along one side of the nail.
    • Proximal — white or yellow spots appear in the lunula, the proximal growing end of the nail. Debris may accumulate under the proximal portion of the nail, causing onycholysis and a white discolouration that spreads distally. 
    • Subungual hyperkeratosis — scaling under the distal nail; the nail is discoloured, opaque, and thickened.
    • Endonyx — infection of the nail plate with white discolouration, in the absence of onycholysis and subungual hyperkeratosis.
    • Total dystrophy — marked thickening and hyperkeratosis; the nail plate is almost completely destroyed. Primary total dystrophy is rare, is usually caused by Candida infection, and typically affects immunocompromised people.
    • Associated with paronychia — usually, proximal nail fold infection with painful redness and swelling of the periungual skin and possible pus collection. Typically pressure on and movement of the nail is painful. Candida infection is likely. See the CKS topic on Paronychia - acute for more information.
  • Note: some nails have features from a combination of different classes. Images of these presentations of fungal nail infection are available at www.dermnetnz.org.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on when to suspect fungal nail infection are based on expert opinion in the British Association of Dermatologists' Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], Public Health England guidance Fungal skin and nail infection: diagnosis and investigation [PHE, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles on fungal nail infection [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].

  • Classification (based on the morphologic pattern of involvement and mode of invasion of the nail) of different presentations of fungal nail infection is useful, as this may help to guide management options and predict prognosis [Frazier, 2021].
  • Distal lateral subungual onychomycosis is the most common type (58-85%) of all cases) [Piraccini, 2022].
  • The first and fifth toenails are most commonly affected, as they are more likely to be damaged by footwear [Ameen, 2014].

How should I assess suspected fungal nail infection?

If fungal nail infection is suspected on the basis of clinical features: 

  • Ask the person about:
    • Symptoms such as pain and discomfort.
    • Any impact on psychosocial functioning and quality of life, such as difficulty wearing footwear and walking.
    • Any co-morbidities or risk factors for infection.
    • Any family or household members affected.
  • Examine the person to assess:
  • Arrange for nail clippings and/or scrapings for fungal microscopy and culture to confirm the diagnosis and underlying cause, if the person wishes to consider management with antifungal treatments.
    • Interpret the results as positive if:
      • For dermatophytes, either microscopy or culture is positive.
      • For Candida species, both microscopy and culture are positive.
      • For non-dermatophytes, both microscopy and culture are positive on at least two samples taken at different times.
    • Interpret the results with caution, as false-negative rates for culture may be as high as 30%.
      • Advise the person a negative test result cannot definitively exclude fungal nail infection.
      • Arrange for repeat samples to be taken if the result is negative and there is a high clinical suspicion of fungal nail infection.

Taking nail samples

  • When taking samples of the abnormal nail (nail clippings), and any debris between the nail and nail bed (nail scrapings):
    • Wipe off any treatment creams, lotions, or powders with 70% alcohol before sampling, to prevent contamination.
    • If a superficial infection of the nail is suspected, use a scalpel blade to obtain scrapings of the surface of the nail.
    • If a deeper infection of the nail is suspected:
      • When clipping the diseased nail, use sterile nail clippers or chiropody scissors to include the full thickness of the nail and extend as far back from the nail tip as possible (viable fungi are most likely to be found in the most proximal part of the diseased nail; distal nail samples should be avoided as contamination is common).
      • Include scrapings of debris from the area between the nail and nail bed using a sterile scalpel blade.
    • Collect the samples into folded dark paper squares, secure them with a paper clip, and place them in a plastic sample bag. Alternatively, commercially available packs are available. Label the sample clearly.
    • Keep the samples at room temperature and do not refrigerate them (dermatophytes are inhibited at low temperatures, and humidity facilitates the growth of contaminants).
    • Inform the person that microscopy results (to identify hyphae, pseudohyphae, or spores) should be available within 1–2 days and culture results (to identify the causative organism) within 2–3 weeks.
    • Be aware that testing for antifungal susceptibilities is not required.

[Ameen, 2014; UKHSA, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on assessment are based on expert opinion in the British Association of Dermatologists' (BAD) Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], the Public Health England (PHE) publication Fungal skin and nail infections: Diagnosis and laboratory investigation [UKHSA, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles on fungal nail infection [Tosti, 2016; Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].

  • Distal nail infection with Candida species is uncommon and the majority of people affected also have Raynaud's phenomenon or some other form of vascular insufficiency [Ameen, 2014].
  • In children with a fungal nail infection, other household members should be examined to exclude active infection [Jazdarehee, 2022].
  • The recommendation to assess for fungal infection at other sites is based on the fact that toenail infection is often associated with tinea pedis, and fingernail infection is often associated with tinea corporis or tinea capitis [Tosti, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].

Advice on nail sampling and interpretation of results

  • The recommendation to perform nail sampling on any person considering antifungal treatment is extrapolated from expert opinion in the BAD publication [Ameen, 2014], the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles [Frazier, 2021; Piraccini, 2022]. The detailed information on nail sampling is based on the fact that good nail specimens give the maximal chance of identifying the causative organism, and therefore targeting treatment appropriately [Ameen, 2014]. 
    • Fungal culture is important as it distinguishes dermatophyte from non-dermatophyte infections, which present similarly, as these two organisms may need different treatment approaches [Ameen, 2014; UKHSA, 2017].
    • The 50% false-negative rate for mycology culture is based on expert opinion in a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2022]. The PHE publication notes that only 45% of mycological samples received are positive for fungal infection [UKHSA, 2017].
    • The recommendation to arrange repeat fungal microscopy and culture to confirm the presence of non-dermatophyte infection is extrapolated from the PHE publication, which states that diagnosis requires positive microscopy and culture, ideally on repeated occasions [UKHSA, 2017]. This is supported by expert opinion in the BAD guidelines, which note that non-dermatophyte organisms are often transient contaminants or commensals of uncertain clinical significance, and microscopy of nail samples is often negative. Consistent isolation of these organisms on repeat sampling suggests they are a true pathogen [Ameen, 2014].
    • The recommendation to repeat nail sampling if the result is negative and clinical suspicion of fungal nail infection is high is based on expert opinion in a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • The recommendation that antifungal susceptibility testing is not needed is based on the fact that antifungal resistance is rare, and there is no known correlation between antifungal susceptibilities and outcome [UKHSA, 2017].

What else might it be?

Nail conditions that may present similarly to (and may co-exist with) fungal nail infection include:

  • Psoriasis — there may be nail pitting, subungual hyperkeratosis, nail dystrophy, and the 'oil drop sign'. See the CKS topic on Psoriasis for more information.
  • Lichen planus — this condition may affect the skin, mucous membranes, and/or nails.
    • Nails may be thinned (or may thicken) and become grooved, fissured, and ridged; be discoloured; and separate from the nail bed. The cuticle may be destroyed leaving a scar at the proximal aspect of the nail. The nails may shed, stop growing, or completely disappear (rare).
    • Skin lesions are typically purplish, shiny, flat-topped, firm papules varying from pin-point to larger than a centimetre in diameter. Lesions are often crossed by fine white lines (Wickham's striae).
  • Eczema — affected nails are irregular, ridged (corrugated surface), and thickened. See the CKS topics on Eczema - atopic and Seborrhoeic dermatitis for more information.
  • Alopecia areata — nail changes include nail pitting, ridging, and brittle nails. See the CKS topic on Alopecia areata for more information.
  • Bacterial infection — nails may turn black or green, especially if infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. See the CKS topic on Paronychia - acute for more information.
  • Viral warts — periungual warts grow at the sides or under the nails and can distort nail growth and there may be longitudinal depressed grooves in the nail plate. See the CKS topic on Warts and verrucae for more information.
  • Onychogryphosis — the nail is thickened with scaling under the nail. This is more common in older people.
  • Trauma — the nail plate may look abnormal but the nail bed should be normal. There may be distal onycholysis (nail separates from the nail bed) with repeated trauma. It may cause white spots which can mimic proximal onychomycosis.
  • Yellow nail syndrome — the nail plate is discoloured green-yellow and nails are hard with elevated longitudinal curvature. The nails may shed. This is associated with bronchiectasis, lymphoedema, and chronic sinusitis.
  • Periungual squamous cell carcinoma or Bowen's disease — a single nail is typically affected with warty changes of the nail fold; oozing or bleeding from the edge of the nail may be seen. See the CKS topic on Skin cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • Subungual malignant melanoma — abnormal black pigmentation of the nail plate or nail bed that extends onto the nail fold. This typically slowly increases in size becoming increasingly irregular in colour and border. There may be eventual bleeding and ulceration. See the CKS topic on Melanoma and pigmented lesions for more information.

Basis for recommendation

The information on the differential diagnosis of fungal nail infection is based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021], expert opinion in the British Association of Dermatologists' Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], and expert opinion in review articles on fungal nail infection [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].

Management

Scenario: Management of fungal nail infection

From age 12 years onwards.

How should I initially manage confirmed fungal nail infection?

The management of fungal nail infection depends on the site and severity of nail involvement, the causative organism, the person's symptoms, and any co-morbidities.

Discuss with the patient their expectations for successful management of the condition before starting treatment. Onychomycosis is difficult to eradicate and often recurs.

  • Advise on self-care management strategies.
    • Keep nails trimmed short and filed down. Avoid sharing toenail clippers with family members.
    • Wear well-fitting non-occlusive shoes, without high heels or narrow toes. Consider replacing old footwear that could be contaminated with fungal spores.
    • Wear cotton, absorbent socks.
    • Maintain good foot hygiene, including prompt treatment of any associated tinea pedis. See the CKS topic on Fungal skin infection - foot for more information.
    • Wear protective footwear when using communal bathing places, locker rooms, and gymnasiums, to avoid re-exposure.
    • Avoid prolonged or frequent exposure to warm, damp conditions if possible.
    • Avoid trauma to the nails if possible.
  • Provide information on sources of advice and support, such as:
  • Advise that antifungal treatment is not needed if:
    • The person is not troubled by the appearance of the nail(s), and/or
    • Infection is asymptomatic.
  • Advise on the option of antifungal treatment if:
  • If dermatophyte or Candida nail infection is confirmed, advise on the option of topical antifungal treatment in adults if there is:
    • Only very early, distal, and superficial nail involvement.
    • Superficial white onychomycosis.
    • A contraindication to oral antifungal treatment. See the sections on Oral terbinafine and Oral itraconazole in Prescribing information for more information.
    • Advise that cure rates are very low.
  • If topical treatment is appropriate, advise on the use of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer.
    • This can be purchased over-the-counter and is applied once or twice weekly to the affected nail(s) after gentle nail filing.
      • Treatment should be continued for 6 months for fingernails and 9–12 months for toenails.
      • If there is Candida infection with associated paronychia, topical treatment should also be applied to the area of paronychia.
      • Advise the person to avoid cosmetic nail varnishes or artificial nails during treatment.
      • Topical treatment may be used preventatively after successful initial treatment.
      • See the section on Topical amorolfine in Prescribing information for more information.
    • Advise that the use of other topical treatments such as tea tree oil is not recommended.
  • If self-care measures alone and/or topical treatment is not successful or appropriate, advise on the option of oral antifungal treatment.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on self-care strategies and topical antifungal treatment are based on expert opinion in the British Association of Dermatologists' (BAD) Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], an evidence-based review of topical treatments [Gupta, 2014], a meta-analysis of combination treatments [Feng, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles on fungal nail infection [Tosti, 2016; Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022] and in the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2023]. 

Advice on self-care strategies
  • The recommendations on self-care strategies to help manage the infection and reduce the risk of re-infection are based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014] and in review articles on minimizing disease relapse and recurrence [Tosti, 2016; Daggett, 2019].
    • The recommendation to discard old footwear is based on the fact that this may contain a fungal reservoir, which can cause fungal reinfection [Piraccini, 2022].
Offering topical antifungal monotherapy
  • The recommendation to manage patient expectations regarding the outcome of treatment is based on expert opinion in review articles [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].
  • The recommendation on considering topical antifungal treatment for adults with only minimal disease (not in children) is based on the fact that topical treatment is not licensed for use in children, and there is no evidence for efficacy in this population group in clinical trials [Ameen, 2014]. The PHE publication also recommends not treating children in primary care [UKHSA, 2017].
  • The recommendation to confirm the diagnosis of fungal nail infection with fungal microscopy and culture before starting antifungal treatment is based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014] and expert opinion in review articles [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • This may help to exclude alternative non-fungal conditions which may present similarly, to detect mixed infections, and to identify specific causative organisms that need treatment [Ameen, 2014].
  • The recommendations on when to consider topical antifungal monotherapy are based on limited evidence and expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014] and expert opinion in review articles [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022] and the BNF [BNF, 2023].
    • Amorolfine has broad-spectrum fungicidal and fungistatic activity, and is fungicidal against Candida albicans and the dermatophyte Trichophyton mentagrophytes [Ameen, 2014]. It is less effective against non-dermatophyte infections [Gupta, 2014]. Expert opinion in the BAD guidelines and a review article note that the indications for topical antifungal treatment are limited as the hard keratin and compact structure of the dorsal nail plate act as a barrier to drug diffusion into and through the nail plate [Ameen, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • A network meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various treatments for dermatophyte infection found topical amorolfine was significantly superior in efficacy to placebo [Gupta, 2015b].
  • The recommendations on the duration and frequency of topical treatment are largely based on the BAD guidelines and the BNF [Ameen, 2014; BNF, 2023].
    • CKS notes that the PHE publication recommends a 12-month treatment course for toenails if there is confirmed superficial dermatophyte or Candida infection [UKHSA, 2017].
    • The BAD guidelines state that once-weekly application is as effective as twice-weekly application. The BNF recommends treatment once or twice weekly.
  • Topical antifungal used as a preventative strategy after successful treatment is suggested in a review article on onychomycosis in older adults [Gupta, 2022].
  • The recommendation to avoid commercial nail varnishes and artificial nails during treatment is based on expert opinion in the BNF [BNF, 2023] and the manufacturers' Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) [ABPI, 2023].
  • The recommendation on not offering other topical treatments such as tea tree oil is based on expert opinion in a review article, which states that combined data from studies did not demonstrate significant benefit from this preparation [Westerberg, 2013].

When should I offer oral antifungal treatment?

Offer treatment with an oral antifungal agent if an adult has confirmed fungal nail infection and self-care measures alone and/or topical treatment are not successful or appropriate.

  • If dermatophyte nail infection is confirmed:
    • Prescribe oral terbinafine first-line.
      • Prescribe 250 mg once a day for between 6 weeks for fingernail infections, and for 12-24 weeks for toenail infections.
      • Advise the person that visible improvement may be seen after the end of 2 months of fingernail treatment and 3 months of toenail treatment.
      • See the section on Oral terbinafine in the section on Prescribing information for more detailed information.
    • Prescribe oral itraconazole if an alternative drug is indicated.
      • Prescribe as pulsed therapy of 200 mg twice a day for 1 week, with subsequent courses repeated after a further 21 days.
      • Prescribe two pulses for fingernail infections and three pulses for toenail infections.
      • See the section on Oral itraconazole in the section on Prescribing information for more detailed information.
    • Consider relevant comorbidities, polypharmacy, renal and hepatic insufficiency, and compliance when prescribing for older adults.
  • If Candida or non-dermatophyte nail infection is confirmed:
    • Prescribe oral itraconazole first-line.
      • Prescribe as pulsed therapy of 200 mg twice a day for 1 week, with subsequent courses repeated after a further 21 days.
      • Prescribe two pulses for fingernail infections, and three pulses for toenail infections.
      • Be aware that the use of itraconazole for non-dermatophyte infections is off-label.
      • See the section on Oral itraconazole in the section on Prescribing information for more detailed information.
    • Prescribe oral terbinafine if an alternative drug is indicated.
      • Prescribe 250 mg once a day for between 6–12 weeks for fingernail infections, and for 12–24 weeks for toenail infections.
      • Be aware that the use of terbinafine for non-dermatophyte infections is off-label.
      • See the section on Oral terbinafine in the section on Prescribing information for more detailed information.
    • Consider topical treatments if both terbinafine and itraconazole are not tolerated or are contraindicated.
    • Treat any associated paronychia. See the CKS topic on Paronychia - acute for more information.
  • Monitor for any subsequent nail growth 3–6 months after the start of treatment.
    • Consider filing a notch at the base of the most abnormal nail when starting oral antifungal treatment — this can help future comparisons of old with new nail growth.
    • Advise that serial photographs (for example with a mobile phone camera) may also help monitor nail growth.
      • If abnormal nail remains distal to the notch as it grows out, no further treatment is required.
      • If abnormal nail moves proximal to the notch, this indicates ongoing infection and further treatment is needed.
    • If normal nail regrowth does not occur, see the section on Treatment failure for further management options.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on oral antifungal treatment are based on expert opinion in the British Association of Dermatologists' (BAD) Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], the Public Health England (PHE) publication Fungal skin and nail infections: Diagnosis and laboratory investigation [UKHSA, 2017], a Cochrane systematic review Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (Review) [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017], a network meta-analysis of onychomycosis treatments [Gupta, 2015b], a meta-analysis of combination treatments [Feng, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles [Gupta, 2020; Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022] and in the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2023].

  • The recommendation to manage patient expectations regarding the outcome of treatment is based on expert opinion in review articles [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].
  • The recommendation for considering oral antifungal treatment for adults (not children) is based on the fact that terbinafine and itraconazole are not licensed for use in children [Ameen, 2014]. The PHE publication also recommends not treating children in primary care [UKHSA, 2017].
  • The recommendation on confirming the diagnosis of fungal nail infection with fungal microscopy and culture before starting antifungal treatment is based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014], the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017], and in review articles [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • This may be helpful to exclude alternative non-fungal conditions that may present similarly, to detect mixed infections, and to identify specific causative organisms which need treatment [Ameen, 2014].
Offering oral terbinafine treatment
  • The recommendation to offer terbinafine first-line for dermatophyte infection is based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014], the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017], a network meta-analysis [Gupta, 2015b], a Cochrane systematic review [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles[Gupta, 2020; Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • Terbinafine is both fungistatic and fungicidal, and is particularly fungicidal against the dermatophytes Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. It has lower fungistatic activity against Candida species than the azoles, such as itraconazole [Ameen, 2014].
    • The BAD guidelines state that terbinafine should be used first-line for dermatophyte infections due to its higher efficacy and tolerability compared with other oral preparations. Terbinafine also has a lower risk of drug interactions than itraconazole and has a long half-life, persisting in the nail for 6 months after the completion of treatment. In addition, studies have found lower recurrence rates with terbinafine compared with itraconazole when treating dermatophyte infections [Ameen, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • This is supported by a network meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various treatments for dermatophyte infection, which found that terbinafine and pulsed itraconazole regimens had the greatest relative odds ratios of mycological cure when compared with various other oral and topical antifungal agents. CKS notes that clinical cure rates were not considered due to different definitions of this outcome across trials [Gupta, 2015b].
    • A Cochrane systematic review of oral antifungal treatments for toenail onychomycosis analysed 48 RCTs (n = 10,200, 47/48 studies assessed dermatophyte infections) and found [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017]:
      • High-quality evidence that terbinafine is more effective than placebo for achieving clinical and mycological cure.
      • Moderate-quality evidence that terbinafine was probably more effective than azoles such as itraconazole for achieving clinical and mycological cure, with the same risk of adverse events.
      • Low-quality evidence that terbinafine may lower the recurrence rate when compared with placebo.
  • The recommendations on the dosage instructions for terbinafine are based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014], a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2022], and BNF [BNF, 2023].
  • The recommendation to consider compliance, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and renal or hepatic insufficiency in older adults is based on expert opinion in a review article [Gupta, 2022].
Offering oral itraconazole treatment
  • The recommendation to offer itraconazole first-line for Candida and non-dermatophyte infection is based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014], the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017], a Cochrane systematic review [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017], and expert opinion in a review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • Itraconazole is a fungistatic agent and is active against yeasts, dermatophytes, and some non-dermatophyte moulds [Ameen, 2014].
    • The BAD guidelines note that in vitro susceptibility testing has shown that the non-dermatophyte Aspergillus has excellent susceptibility to itraconazole, and studies have found itraconazole has significantly greater efficacy than terbinafine for the treatment of Candida nail infections [Ameen, 2014].
    • Itraconazole concentrates and persists in the nail plate, resulting in intermittent pulsed dosing regimens being as effective as continuous daily dosing [Ameen, 2014]. In addition, it has a long half-life, persisting in the nail for 6–9 months after the completion of treatment [Ameen, 2014].
    • A Cochrane systematic review of oral antifungal treatments for toenail onychomycosis analysed 48 RCTs (n = 10,200, 47/48 studies assessed dermatophyte infections) and found [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017]:
      • High-quality evidence that azoles are more effective than placebo for achieving clinical and mycological cure.
      • Low-quality evidence that azoles may lower the recurrence rate when compared with placebo.
    • Expert opinion in review articles note that non-dermatophyte moulds are difficult to treat and may be a reason for treatment failure [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Piraccini, 2022].
  • The recommendations on the dosage instructions for itraconazole are based on expert opinion in the BNF [BNF, 2023].
Considering oral griseofulvin treatment
Monitoring for nail growth
  • The recommendation on checking for nail growth 3–6 months after the start of treatment is based on expert opinion in the BAD guidelines and in a review article, as this is the time period needed for outgrowth of healthy nail, and the optimal clinical effect is seen months after mycological cure and stopping antifungal treatment [Ameen, 2014; Eisman, 2014].
  • The recommendation on using serial photography to monitor nail growth is based on expert opinion in a review article [Eisman, 2014].
  • The recommendations on the need for ongoing treatment depending on nail regrowth are based on expert opinion in a review article [Eisman, 2014].

How should I manage treatment failure?

  • If normal nail regrowth does not occur after oral antifungal treatment and there are signs of treatment failure:
    • Consider and, if possible, manage any underlying cause of treatment failure; co-existing tinea pedis is common  — use topical antifungal to treat.
    • Consider arranging re-sampling for nail clippings and/or scrapings for fungal microscopy and culture. 
    • Consider the use of a combination treatment with a topical and oral antifungal agent.
    • Note: be aware that the nail's appearance may not be restored to normal, even after successful eradication of infection.
  • Consider arranging a referral to a podiatrist if:
    • Thickened toenails cause discomfort when walking.
    • There is nail trauma due to the person's footwear.
    • Deformed toenails are traumatizing adjacent toes.
  • Consider arranging a referral to a paediatric dermatologist if:
    • Oral antifungal treatment is being considered for a child.
  • Consider arranging a referral to a dermatologist if:
    • The diagnosis is uncertain.
    • Treatment in primary care is unsuccessful.
    • There is co-existent nail disease, such as psoriasis or lichen planus.
    • The person is immunocompromised, depending on clinical judgement.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on treatment failure are based on the British Association of Dermatologists' (BAD) Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], the Public Health England (PHE) publication Fungal skin and nail infections: Diagnosis and laboratory investigation [UKHSA, 2017], a meta-analysis of combination treatments [Feng, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles on fungal nail infection [Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; PCDS, 2022] and the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2023].

Considering combination topical and oral antifungal treatment
  • Considering co-existing tinea pedis is recommended when considering treatment failure or recurrent infection by Primary Care Dermatology Society [PCDS, 2022].
  • The recommendation for considering a combination of topical and oral antifungal treatment is based on limited and conflicting evidence cited in the BAD guidelines, which suggests this approach may be particularly relevant for non-dermatophyte infections that are resistant to standard oral antifungal monotherapy [Ameen, 2014].
  • This is supported by a meta-analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of topical amorolfine in combination with oral antifungals (five RCTs, n = 713), which found combination treatment can result in a greater likelihood of complete clearance (both clinical and mycological cure) of onychomycosis compared with oral antifungal monotherapy, with no increase in adverse effects [Feng, 2017].
    • It suggests that topical antifungals such as amorolfine may increase the efficacy of oral antifungals, offering a more rapid cure and preventing relapses.
    • CKS notes that there were various limitations to this study including non-standardized follow-up times and treatment courses in different trials.
Arranging referral to podiatry
  • Podiatry may be able to obtain improved specimens for fungal culture, such as using a sharp curette to obtain material from the nail bed close to the lanula, or obtaining a superficial punch biopsy of the proximal nail plate [Eisman, 2014]. This may help to identify whether treatment failure is due to repeat infection or another fungal strain [Ameen, 2014].
  • Podiatry may be able to perform chemical or surgical avulsion (complete removal) or debridement (partial removal) of the affected nail, which may be particularly useful in severe disease and extensive nail thickening [Piraccini, 2022].
    • These procedures may help to reduce fungal mass (for example dermatophytomas) and increase the penetration of antifungal treatment [Ameen, 2014]. They may also be useful in the management of non-dermatophyte infections that are resistant to standard oral antifungal monotherapy. Improved outcomes may be seen with combination treatment of antifungal therapy with intermittent nail debridement or avulsion.
    • This approach is supported by expert opinion in a review article which states that oral antifungal treatment with concomitant nail debridement increases cure rates [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • Rarely, people may elect to undergo permanent nail removal if they have a refractory fungal infection or frequent recurrences [Westerberg, 2013].
  • Podiatry may also be able to provide advice on appropriate footwear and orthotic devices if there is nail trauma due to footwear or deformed toes.
Arranging referral to dermatology
  • The recommendations on when to consider referral to dermatology are based on the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017] and expert opinion in a review article [Eisman, 2014].
    • Dermatology may be able to obtain improved specimens for fungal culture, such as using a sharp curette to obtain material from the nail bed close to the lanula, or obtaining a superficial punch biopsy of the proximal nail plate [Eisman, 2014]. This may help to identify whether treatment failure is due to repeat infection or another fungal strain [Ameen, 2014].
    • The recommendation on arranging referral for all children is largely based on the PHE publication [UKHSA, 2017] and is extrapolated from expert opinion in the BNF [BNF, 2023].
      • Fungal nail infection is rare in children, oral antifungal treatments are off-label in this age group, and topical antifungal treatments are often ineffective and are off-label in children under 12 years of age, so treatment should be initiated by a specialist.
    • The recommendation on considering referral for immunocompromised people is extrapolated from expert opinion in the BAD guidelines [Ameen, 2014] and a review article [Eisman, 2014].
      • This population group are more likely to have severe, refractory infection including non-dermatophyte infection which does not respond to standard treatment in primary care, and they are at increased risk of complications [Eisman, 2014].
      • They may also need prolonged antifungal treatment courses and may have drug resistance to standard antifungal treatments [Ameen, 2014; Eisman, 2014].
  • Newer topical treatments such as ciclopirox (8%), efinaconazole (10%), or tavaborole (5%) topical solutions are more effective than amorolfine, but are not currently available in the UK [Foley, 2020; Gregoriou, 2022]. Treatment with an Nd:YAG laser has not been proven effective.

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Topical amorolfine

Contraindications and cautions

  • Advise people using topical amorolfine nail lacquer to avoid contact with the ears, eyes, and mucous membranes.
  • Advise people that topical amorolfine nail lacquer contains 55.2% ethanol and as such is a flammable substance. It should not therefore be used near a naked flame or hair dryers.  

[ABPI, 2023; BNF, 2023]

Adverse effects

  • Advise people applying topical amorolfine nail lacquer that a burning sensation, erythema, hypersensitivity reactions, itching, and occasional local irritation may occur after application.

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2023]

Drug interactions

  • No drug interaction studies have been performed regarding the use of topical amorolfine nail lacquer.

[ABPI, 2023; BNF, 2023; Preston, 2019]

Oral terbinafine

Contraindications and cautions

Do not prescribe terbinafine to people with:

  • Hepatic impairment — the manufacturer recommends that terbinafine should not be prescribed in people with chronic or active hepatic disease. It recommends that for other people, liver function tests (LFTs) should be performed. Hepatotoxicity may occur in people with and without pre-existing hepatic disease, therefore periodic monitoring of LFTs (after 4–6 weeks of treatment) is recommended. Terbinafine should be stopped immediately if LFTs are deranged.
  • Severe renal impairment.

Prescribe terbinafine with caution to people with:

  • Autoimmune disease — risk of lupus erythematosus-like effect.
  • Psoriasis — increased risk of exacerbation of psoriasis.
  • Renal impairment — the BNF recommends that half the normal dose of terbinafine should be used if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and there is no suitable alternative. However, the manufacturer does not recommend using terbinafine in these people, as it has not been adequately studied.

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2023]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects of terbinafine include:

  • Gastrointestinal — abdominal distension, dyspepsia, nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, feeling of fullness (very common), and pancreatitis (unknown frequency).
  • Nervous system — headache (common); taste disturbance (uncommon); and dizziness, paraesthesia, and hypoaesthesia (rare).
  • Skin and subcutaneous tissue — rash, urticarial (very common). Very rarely Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis erythema multiforme, skin eruption, dermatitis exfoliative, dermatitis bullous, photosensitivity reaction, and alopecia.
  • Other common or very common adverse effects include arthralgia, myalgia, and decreased appetite.
  • Other rare or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Anaphylaxis.
    • Hepatic dysfunction, jaundice, hepatitis, and cholestasis — people taking terbinafine tablets should be warned to immediately report any signs and symptoms of unexplained persistent nausea, decreased appetite, fatigue, vomiting, right upper abdominal pain, jaundice, dark urine, or pale faeces. If these symptoms develop, terbinafine treatment should be stopped, and liver function tests (LFTs) should be immediately performed.
    • Malaise, neutropenia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and vertigo.

[EMC, 2020; BNF, 2023]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with terbinafine include:

  • Codeine — the analgesic effect may be reduced or abolished by terbinafine. Monitor for analgesic efficacy.
  • Rifampicin — levels of terbinafine are reduced. Dose increases of terbinafine may be necessary.
  • Tamoxifen — avoid concurrent use. Metabolism to an active metabolite of tamoxifen may be inhibited by terbinafine. 
  • Terbinafine levels may be increased by the following drugs if taken concomitantly:
    • Amiodarone.
    • Fluconazole, ketoconazole.
  • Terbinafine may increase levels of the following drugs if taken concomitantly, thereby increasing or prolonging their effects, including adverse effects:
    • Anti-arrhythmics (flecainide, mexiletine, and propafenone).
    • Aripiprazole, risperidone.
    • Beta-blockers (carvedilol, metoprolol, nebivolol, propranolol, and timolol).
    • Dextromethorphan.
    • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors Type B (MAOIs-B, such as selegiline).
    • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline and paroxetine).
    • Tramadol – terbinafine may increase levels of tramadol, but not the active metabolite, which causes an increase in adverse effects, but not in analgesic effect.
    • Tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, imipramine, and nortriptyline).

 [EMC, 2020; BNF, 2023; Preston, 2019]

Oral itraconazole

Contraindications and cautions

Do not prescribe itraconazole to people with:

  • Acute porphyria.
  • Ventricular dysfunction or a history of heart failure — itraconazole has been shown to have a negative inotropic effect.

Prescribe itraconazole with caution to people:

  • At high risk of heart failure, including people on treatment with negative inotropic drugs (such as calcium-channel blockers).
  • Who are immunocompromised (AIDS, neutropenia, or transplants).
  • With acute liver disease or a history of hepatotoxicity with other drugs — consider monitoring liver function tests (LFTs). Advise immediate LFTs if symptoms of possible liver toxicity develop, such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, abdominal pain, or dark urine.
  • With renal impairment.
  • Taking drugs such as astemizole, pimozide, quinidine, or terfenadine that may prolong the QT interval, as there is a risk of cardiac arrhythmias.

[ABPI, 2018; BNF, 2023]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects of itraconazole include:

  • Gastrointestinal — nausea and abdominal pain (common); vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, dyspepsia, taste disturbance, and flatulence (uncommon); and pancreatitis (rare).
  • Hepatobiliary — hyperbilirubinaemia (uncommon). Rarely hepatotoxicity (including acute liver failure).
  • Nervous system — headache, dizziness, and paraesthesia (uncommon).
  • Skin and subcutaneous tissue — rash (common) and alopecia, urticaria, and pruritus (uncommon).
  • Other adverse effects include arthralgia, myalgia, heart failure, erectile dysfunction, menstrual disorders, oedema, tinnitus, and visual disturbance.

  [ABPI, 2018; BNF, 2023]

Drug interactions

Itraconazole is metabolized by the cytochrome p450 3A4 (isoenzyme CYP34A) and it interacts with a number of liver enzyme-inducing and liver enzyme-inhibiting drugs.

  • Itraconazole levels may be reduced by the following drugs:
    • Carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin — monitor itraconazole efficacy and increase the dose if necessary.
    • Rifampicin and rifabutin — monitor itraconazole efficacy and increase the dose if necessary.
    • St John’s wort — avoid concurrent use.
  • Itraconazole levels may be increased by the following drugs:
    • HIV protease inhibitors (ritonavir and indinavir) — monitor for adverse effects.
    • Clarithromycin and erythromycin — monitor for adverse effects.
  • Itraconazole may increase levels of the following drugs:
    • Aliskiren — monitor for adverse effects.
    • Aripiprazole, quetiapine, and risperidone — dose reductions may be necessary.
    • Quetiapine — concurrent use with itraconazole is contraindicated. If considered necessary, monitor for adverse effects and adjust the dose.
    • Phospodiesterase-5 inhibitors (avanafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil) — avoid concurrent use with avanafil; reduce the dose of sildenafil or vardenafil.
    • Benzodiazepines (alprazolam, triazolam, and midazolam) — dose reductions may be required.
    • Calcium-channel blockers (amlodipine and verapamil) — monitor for adverse effects.
    • Colchicine — dose adjustment may be necessary.
    • Corticosteroids (budesonide and dexamethasone) — avoid concurrent use.
    • Digoxin — monitor the effects of digoxin; digoxin dose may need to be reduced by 50–75%.
    • Disopyramide — avoid concurrent use.
    • Domperidone — possible increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Avoid concurrent use.
    • Eplerenone — concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Ergot alkaloids (such as ergotamine and ergometrine) — increased risk of ergotism. Concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Ivabradine — concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Mizolastine — monitor for adverse effects.
    • Oral anticoagulants (warfarin, apixaban, and dabigatran). Monitor for adverse effects and adjust doses if required.
    • Pimozide — increased risk of QT interval prolongation. Concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Quinidine — increased risk of torsades de pointes. Concurrent use is contraindicated, but if considered necessary, monitor for adverse effects and reduce dose if required.
    • Ranolazine — increased risk of QT interval prolongation. Concurrent use is contraindicated.
    • Reboxetine — monitor for adverse effects and adjust dose if required.
    • Solifenacin — restrict dose of solifenacin to 5 mg daily.
    • Statins (lovastatin, simvastatin) — avoid concurrent use. 

[ABPI, 2018; BNF, 2023; Preston, 2019]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the British Association of Dermatologists' Guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014 [Ameen, 2014], the Public Health England publication Fungal skin and nail infections: Diagnosis and laboratory investigation [UKHSA, 2017], a Cochrane systematic review Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (Review) [Kreijkamp-Kaspers, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles [Gupta, 2020; Frazier, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Jazdarehee, 2022; Piraccini, 2022]. The rationale for the individual recommendations is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation sections.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of fungal nail infections.

Search dates

March 2018 - March 2023

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for EBSCO Medline.

  • (MH "Onychomycosis") 
  • AB onychomyco* OR TI onychomyco*
  • AB ( (fungal* OR mould* OR mold OR molds OR tinea OR dermatophyt* OR myco* OR dermatomyco*) N3 (nail OR nails OR fingernail* OR toenail*) ) OR TI ( (fungal* OR mould* OR mold OR molds OR tinea OR dermatophyt* OR myco* OR dermatomyco*) N3 (nail OR nails OR fingernail* OR toenail*) )

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2018) SPC for Itraconazole 100 mg Capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2023) SPC for Loceryl 5% w/v Medicated Nail Lacquer. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Ameen, M., Lear, J.T., Madan, V., et al. (2014) British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of onychomycosis 2014. British Journal of Dermatology 171(5), 937-958. [Abstract]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2022) Dermatophyte infections. BMJ Publishing Group. https://bestpractice.bmj.com
  • BNF (2023) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Daggett, C., Brodell, R.T., Daniel, C.R. and Jackson, J. (2019) Onychomycosis in Athletes. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 20(5), 691-698. [Free Full-text]
  • Eisman, S. and Sinclair, R. (2014) Fungal nail infection: diagnosis and management. British Medical Journal 348, 1-11. [Abstract]
  • EMC (2020) SPC for Terbinafine 250mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2023) SPC for Clarithromycin 250 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Feng, X., Xincai, X. and Ran, Y. (2017) Efficacy and tolerability of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer in combination with systemic antifungal agents for onychomycosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dermatologic Therapy 30(3), 1-6. [Abstract]
  • Foley, K., Gupta, A.K., Versteeg, S., et al. (2020) Topical and device‐based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails. (Cochrane Review/Cochrane Intervention Protocol). Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Frazier, W.T., Santiago-Delgado, Z.M. and Stupka, K.C. (2021) Onychomycosis: Rapid Evidence Review. American Family Physician 104(4), 359-367. [Free Full-text]
  • Gregoriou, S., Kyriazopoulou, M., Tsiogka, A. and Rigopoulos, D. (2022) Novel and Investigational Treatments for Onychomycosis. Journal of Fungi 8(10), 1079. [Free Full-text]
  • Gupta, A.K., Daigle, D. and Foley, K.A. (2014) Topical therapy for toenail onychomycosis: an evidence-based review. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 15(6), 489-502. [Abstract]
  • Gupta, A.K., Daigle, D. and Foley, K.A. (2015a) The prevalence of culture-confirmed toenail onychomycosis in at-risk patient populations. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 29(6), 1039-1044. [Free Full-text]
  • Gupta, A.K., Daigle, D. and Foley, K.A. (2015b) Network meta-analysis of onychomycosis treatments. Skin Appendage Disorders 1(2), 74-81. [Abstract]
  • Gupta, A.K., Stec, N., Summerbell, R.C., et al. (2020) Onychomycosis: a review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 34(9), 1972-1990. [Free Full-text]
  • Gupta, A.K., Venkataraman, M. and Talukder, M. (2022) Onychomycosis in Older Adults: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Management. Drugs and Aging 39(3), 191-198. [Free Full-text]
  • Jazdarehee, A., Malekafzali, L., Lee, J., et al. (2022) Transmission of Onychomycosis and Dermatophytosis between Household Members: A Scoping Review. Journal of Fungi 8(1), 60. [Free Full-text]
  • Kreijkamp‐Kaspers, S., Hawke, K., Guo, L., et al. (2017) Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (Cochrane Review). Issue 7. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Kyriakou, A., Zagalioti, S.C., Trakatelli, M.G., et al. (2022) Fungal Infections and Nail Psoriasis: An Update. Journal of Fungi 8(2), 154. [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PCDS (2022) Tinea manuum (hands), pedis (feet), and unguium (nails). Primary Care Dermatology Society. https://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE (2017) Fungal skin and nail infections: diagnosis and laboratory investigation. Quick reference guide for primary care: for consultation and local adaptation. Public Health England. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Piraccini, B.M., Starace, M., Rubin, A.I., et al. (2022) A working group of the European Nail Society. Onychomycosis: Recommendations for Diagnosis, Assessment of Treatment Efficacy, and Specialist Referral. The CONSONANCE Consensus Project. Dermatology and Therapy 12(4), 885-898. [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C. (2019) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press.
  • Tosti, A. and Elewski, B.E. (2016) Onychomycosis: practical approaches to minimize relapse and recurrence. Skin Appendage Disorders 2(1), 83-87. [Abstract]
  • UKHSA (2017) Fungal skin and nail infections: Diagnosis and laboratory investigation. UK Health Security Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Vestergaard-Jensen, S., Mansouri, A., Jensen, L.H., et al. (2022) Systematic review of the prevalence of onychomycosis in children. Pediatric Dermatology 39(6), 855-865. [Free Full-text]
  • Westerberg, D.P. and Voyack, M.J. (2013) Onychomycosis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. American Family Physician 88(11), 762-770. [Abstract]
Change privacy settings