This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Gastrointestinal

Dyspepsia - proven peptic ulcer

Last revised in May 2024

The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms

Dyspepsia - proven peptic ulcer: Summary

  • The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms which are typically present for four or more weeks, including upper abdominal pain or discomfort, heartburn, acid reflux, nausea and/or vomiting.
    • If symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation predominate, then gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is the more likely diagnosis.
  • Gastric or duodenal ulcers (peptic ulcer disease) describe a breach in the epithelium of the gastric or duodenal mucosa, which is confirmed on endoscopy.
  • The most common risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer disease are Helicobacter pylori infection, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin.
  • Complications of peptic ulcer disease include haemorrhage, perforation, and gastric outlet obstruction.
  • Initial management of peptic ulcer disease includes:
    • Offering advice on lifestyle modification.
    • Assessing for stress, anxiety, and depression.
    • Reviewing and stopping any drugs which may be exacerbating symptoms.
  • Testing for H. pylori infection should be arranged if the person's status is not known or uncertain.
    • Ideally, a carbon-13 urea breath test or stool antigen test should be used — ensuring the person has not taken a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the past 2 weeks, or antibiotics in the past 4 weeks.
    • If the test is positive (with NSAID use), a full-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) should be prescribed for 2 months, followed by first-line H. pylori eradication therapy. If there is no associated NSAID use, eradication therapy should be offered.
    • If the test is negative, full-dose PPI therapy should be offered for 4–8 weeks.
  • All people with a proven gastric ulcer should have a repeat endoscopy arranged and H. pylori re-testing (if appropriate) 6–8 weeks after starting treatment.
    • If the test is positive, second-line H. pylori eradication therapy should be offered.
    • NSAIDs or aspirin should be stopped, if possible and appropriate.
    • A low-dose PPI or standard-dose histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) should be offered as needed.
    • Long-term acid suppression therapy can be considered.
  • People on long-term treatment for peptic ulcer disease should be:
    • Offered an annual review.
    • Encouraged to step down or stop treatment, if possible and appropriate.
  • Referral to a gastroenterologist should be considered if:
    • There are refractory or recurrent symptoms despite optimal management in primary care.
    • Treatment with a second-line H. pylori eradication regimen has been unsuccessful.
    • There are limited antibiotic options for H. pylori eradication therapy.
    • A proven gastric ulcer has not healed on repeat endoscopy.
    • A non-peptic cause of ulcer disease is suspected.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 18 years onwards.

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019].

This CKS topic covers the management of people with a confirmed diagnosis of duodenal or gastric ulcer following endoscopy.

There are separate CKS topics on Dyspepsia - unidentified cause, Dyspepsia - pregnancy-associated, Dyspepsia - proven GORD, Dyspepsia - proven functional, Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral, and GORD in children.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

May 2024 — minor update. A table on PPI doses to use for eradication of H. pylori has been ended to this topic. Information added stating that concomitant treatment with clarithromycin and ivabradine is now contraindicated and caution is now advised when co-administering clarithromycin with edoxaban, as per the manufacturer's updated SPC.

Previous changes

March 2024 — minor update. Information on the use of fluoroquinolones was added to the levofloxacin prescribing section in line with a review published by the MHRA.

January 2024 — minor update. Information on the use of fluoroquinolones and reporting adverse reactions was added in line with the Drug Safety Update published by the MHRA [MHRA, 2023].

July 2023 — minor update. The summary of manufacturer’s product characteristics for clarithromycin was updated to include a warning regarding concomitant treatment with domperidone (due to the risk of QT prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias).

December 2022 — Minor update. Interstitial nephritis added as an adverse effect of lansoprazole, in line with the manufacturer's updated SPC.

November 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.

July 2022 — minor update. Severe cutaneous reactions have been added as a possible adverse effect of omeprazole in line with the updated Summary of Product Characteristics. 

October 2019 — minor update. Topic updated in line with NICE guideline, 2019 update, Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019].

October 2018 — minor update. Adverse effects updated within prescribing information - metronidazole. 

September 2017 — minor update. SPC update on quinolones to align all CKS topics prescribing advice. Prostatitis - chronic, Gonorrhoea, Pyelonephritis, Diarrhoea - prevention and advice for travellers, Dyspepsia - unidentified cause, Dyspepsia - proven functional, Dyspepsia - proven peptic ulcer, Diverticular disease, Gastroenteritis and Scrotal pain and swellings. 

April to May 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in February 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials since the last revision of this topic. The recommendations on primary care management and referral have been updated in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management (2014). The lower age limit has been changed from 16 to 18 years. The content has been amended to include second-line drug regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication, in line with the updated NICE guidance. The prescribing information section has been expanded to include antibiotics recommended for H. pylori eradication. The topic has also undergone significant restructuring.

December 2016 — minor update. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been added as a very infrequent adverse effect of proton pump inhibitors, in line with a Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Drug Safety Update (2015).

July 2015 — minor update. The prescribing information section for clarithromycin has been re-written for clarity.

February 2015 — minor update. The prescribing information section was updated to provide additional information regarding the possible drug interaction of clarithromycin with lovastatin or simvastatin in line with the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (2014).

November 2012 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2012 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic (2012).

September 2012 — minor amendment to text to clarify that testing for Helicobacter pylori should be done before proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is started.

January 2012 — minor update. Information from the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (2011) about the possible drug interaction between pantoprazole and warfarin has been added to the prescribing information section. Information from the British National Formulary (2011) about the potentially serious drug interaction between PPIs and protease inhibitors (atazanavir and saquinavir) has also been added. 

June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic (2011). 

March 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics — no changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

July 2009 — minor update. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued advice on the interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs (2009). Healthcare professionals are advised to avoid concomitant use of these drugs unless considered essential. 

November 2008 — minor typographical corrections.

March to June 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.

May 2007 — minor update. HeliClear triple pack discontinued and prescriptions removed. 

November 2005 — minor update. HeliMet triple pack discontinued and prescriptions removed. 

July 2005 — updated to incorporate the Referral guidelines for suspected cancer published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2005).

December 2004 — reviewed and updated to incorporate the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on Dyspepsia (August 2004). Validated in March 2005 and issued in April 2005.

July 2003 — updated to incorporate information from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Dyspepsia (March 2003). Validated in September 2003 and issued in October 2003.

November 2000 — reviewed and updated to incorporate the Technology appraisal guidance Guidance on the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) in the Treatment of Dyspepsia issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (July 2000), and the Department of Health referral guidelines for suspected upper gastrointestinal cancers. Validated in November 2000 and issued in December 2000.

June 1998 — written.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new guidelines published since 1 November 2022.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 November 2022.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 November 2022.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews published since 1 November 2022.

Primary evidence

No new randomized controlled trials published since November 2022.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 November 2022.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 November 2022.

Changes in product availability

  • Omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg oral solution (Glenmark). This formulation is licensed for a range of indications for adult and paediatric patients, from age over 1 year of age and ≥ 10 kg. The product is single use, and requires assembly, before administration. Licence covers use in feeding tubes from 6 to 15Fr.  See more here.
  • New product: Pylera 140 mg/125 mg/125 mg capsules (bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, tetracycline hydrochloride). This is licensed for use in combination with omeprazole for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcers in patients with active or a history of H. pylori associated ulcers. See more here.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Identify and (if detected), treat Helicobacter pylori infection.
  • Employ management strategies to promote ulcer healing and reduce symptoms effectively.
  • Follow up people, if appropriate.
  • Arrange referral to secondary care, if appropriate.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

The following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards are relevant for this CKS topic:

  • Statement 1. Adults with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms who present to community pharmacists are given advice about making lifestyle changes, using over-the-counter medicines, and when to consult their GP.
  • Statement 2. Adults presenting with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms are referred for urgent direct access endoscopy to take place within 2 weeks if they have dysphagia, or are aged 55 and over with weight loss.
  • Statement 3. Adults with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms have a 2-week washout period before a test for Helicobacter pylori if they are receiving proton pump inhibitor therapy.
  • Statement 4. Adults aged 55 and over with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms, that have not responded to treatment, have a discussion with their GP about referral for non-urgent direct access endoscopy.
  • Statement 5. Adults with persistent, unexplained dyspepsia or reflux symptoms have a discussion with their GP about referral to a specialist service.

[NICE, 2015]

Background information

What is it?

  • The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms which are typically present for four or more weeks, including upper abdominal pain or discomfort, heartburn, acid reflux, and nausea and/or vomiting [NICE, 2019].
    • If symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation predominate, then gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is the more likely diagnosis [Ford, 2013]. See the CKS topic on Dyspepsia - proven GORD for more information.
  • Proven gastric or duodenal ulceration describes a breach in the epithelium of the gastric or duodenal mucosa that penetrates the muscularis mucosae, which is confirmed on endoscopy [NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
    • Collectively, gastric and duodenal ulceration is known as peptic ulcer disease.

What are the risk factors?

  • Risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer disease include [NICE, 2019; Ford, 2016; Gurusamy, 2016; Lanas, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]:
    • Helicobacter pylori infection — in people not taking a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), around 90% with a duodenal ulcer and and 70–80% with a gastric ulcer have H. pylori infection. 
      • Infection causes increased gastric acid secretion in some cases, which elevates the risk of mucosal ulceration.
      • In other cases, gastric acid secretion is reduced causing chronic atrophic gastritis, which increases the risk of gastric ulceration and possible gastric malignancy.
    • Drugs — such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, bisphosphonates, corticosteroids, potassium supplements, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and recreational drugs such as crack cocaine.
      • The incidence of ulcers is 20% in chronic NSAID users compared to 5% in the background population. Aspirin is also associated with peptic ulcer disease.
      • NSAIDs are also associated with a four-fold increased risk of complications of peptic ulcer disease.
      • NSAIDs may have an additive effect with co-existent H. pylori infection, further increasing the risk of peptic ulceration.
    • Smoking — current or former smoking has been has been linked to an almost two-fold increased risk of peptic ulcer disease, although mechanisms are considered likely to be multifactorial.
    • Alcohol consumption and stress — although evidence is conflicting.
    • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (rare) — this hypersecretory state may be associated with multiple peptic ulcers, diarrhoea, weight loss, and hypercalcaemia.

How common is it?

The exact prevalence of peptic ulcer disease is difficult to establish, as the definitions used vary between studies, and endoscopy is needed to make a formal diagnosis [NICE, 2019].

  • In 2014, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reported that in people with dyspepsia symptoms, who undergo endoscopy, approximately 13% have a gastric or duodenal ulcer [NICE, 2019].
  • The rate of newly-diagnosed peptic ulcers has remained constant, but the recurrence rate has fallen rapidly in the past 20–30 years with the introduction of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, and widespread use of acid suppression therapy [Lanas, 2017].
    • The prevalence of duodenal ulcer has declined progressively from 22.2% in 1979 to 5.7% in 1998 [NICE, 2019].
    • The lifetime prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in the general population is estimated to be approximtely 5–10% [Lanas, 2017].
  • The incidence of peptic ulcer disease is about 0.1–0.3% per year [Lanas, 2017], but varies with age [NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]:
    • The incidence of gastric ulcers peaks in the 5th to 7th decades.
    • The incidence of duodenal ulcers peaks in the 3rd to 5th decades.

What are the complications?

  • The risk of complications of peptic ulcer disease is increased in older age groups, people with co-morbidities, and people taking medication such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or anticoagulants. Possible complications include [NICE, 2019; Fashner, 2015; Lanas, 2017; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]:
    • Haemorrhage — acute massive haemorrhage may be life-threatening with a case fatality rate of 5–10%, and chronic bleeding may cause iron deficiency anaemia. See the CKS topic on Anaemia - iron deficiency for more information.
    • Perforation — this may cause peritonitis which may be life-threatening, with a mortality rate of up to 20%.
    • Gastric outlet obstruction — this may result from strictures and stenosis of the pylorus and/or duodenum due to chronic inflammation and scarring.
    • Gastric malignancy — there is an increased risk in Helicobacter pylori positive gastric ulcer disease.

What is the prognosis?

  • With proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, duodenal ulcers typically heal within 4 weeks and gastric ulcers within 8 weeks [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
  • For people with peptic ulcer disease associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication markedly reduces the risk of recurrent ulceration and may cure duodenal ulcers [NICE, 2019].
    • The lifetime risk of recurrence for gastric ulcers is 60% if the person remains H. pylori positive, but 5% following eradication of H. pylori.
    • The lifetime risk of recurrence for duodenal ulcers is 80% if the person remains H. pylori positive, but 5% following eradication of H. pylori.
  • For people with peptic ulcer disease associated with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), stopping the drug or co-prescribing gastroprotection with acid suppression therapy reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence.
  • In England and Wales between 2018 and 2020, the mean crude mortality rate from peptic ulcer disease was approximately 1.5% in people aged 35 to 64 years; 5-6% in people aged 65 to 74 years; and 20% in people aged 75 years and over [NHS Digital, 2022].
    • About 1 in 10 people with a bleeding peptic ulcer will die, and 1 in 4 people with a perforated peptic ulcer will die [Gurusamy, 2016].

Management

Scenario: Management - proven peptic ulcer

From age 18 years onwards.

How should I initially manage a person with a proven peptic ulcer?

  • Assess for any alarm symptoms which may suggest a complication or other serious underlying pathology, and manage appropriately. See the CKS topic on Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • Offer written information and advice on the symptoms, self-care, and management options for peptic ulcer disease, such as the NHS patient information leaflet on Stomach ulcer.
  • Offer advice on lifestyle measures which may improve symptoms. Encourage the person to:
    • Lose weight if they are overweight or obese. See the CKS topic on Obesity for more information.
    • Avoid any trigger foods, such as coffee, chocolate, tomatoes, and fatty or spicy foods.
    • Eat smaller meals, and eat their evening meal 3–4 hours before going to bed, if possible.
    • Stop smoking, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for more information.
    • Reduce alcohol consumption to recommended limits, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking for more information. 
  • Assess for stress, anxiety, and depression which may worsen symptoms. Encourage relaxation strategies, consider referral for psychological therapies, and manage depression symptoms if needed. See the CKS topics on Generalized anxiety disorder and Depression for more information.
  • Review the person's medication:
    • Ask about any over-the-counter medication, such as antacids and/or alginates, which have been tried for symptom relief.
      • Advise that self-treatment with an antacid and/or alginate may be used for short-term symptom control, but long-term, continuous use is not recommended.
    • Advise the person to stop any nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) completely, if possible and appropriate, to allow ulcer healing.
    • Consider reducing or stopping (if possible and appropriate) any other potential ulcer-inducing drugs, such as:
      • Aspirin, bisphosphonates, corticosteroids, potassium supplements, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or recreational drugs such as crack cocaine.
    • Ask about the number and duration of any previous courses of antibiotics, which may affect the choice of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen used (if needed).
  • Test the person for H. pylori infection if their status is not known or uncertain.
    • For the initial detection of H. pylori infection, arrange:
      • A carbon-13 urea breath test or stool antigen test — ensure the person has not taken a PPI in the past 2 weeks, or antibiotics in the past 4 weeks.
      • Laboratory serological testing if the above options are not available, providing the test has been locally validated.
    • If the person tests positive for H. pylori infection with a proven gastric or duodenal ulcer which is:
    • If the person tests negative for H. pylori infection with a proven gastric or duodenal ulcer:
  • Advise the person to arrange a follow-up appointment after initial H. pylori eradication and/or PPI therapy. See the section on Follow-up in primary care for more information.

First-line H. pylori eradication regimens

First-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens consist of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) together with a combination of antibiotics (taking into account previous exposure to clarithromycin or metronidazole), and in some cases bismuth (a chelate). Ensure the person is aware of the importance of compliance with the prescribed regimen.

  • NICE recommend the following PPI doses:
    • Lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20–40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, or rabeprazole 20 mg.
  • If a person tests postive for H. pylori, offer a 7-day triple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and amoxicillin 1 g twice-daily and
    • Either clarithromycin 500 mg twice-daily or metronidazole 400 mg twice-daily.
  • If the person is allergic to penicillin, offer a 7-day triple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and clarithromycin 500 mg twice-daily and metronidazole 400 mg twice-daily.
  • If the person is allergic to pencillin and has had previous exposure to clarithromycin, offer a 7-day quadruple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and metronidazole 400 mg twice-daily and tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg four times daily and bismuth subsalicylate 525 mg four times-daily.

[NICE, 2019; PHE, 2019; BNF, 2022]

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the initial management of peptic ulcer disease are largely based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report Management of Helicobacter pylori infection [Malfertheiner, 2017], the Public Health England (PHE) guideline Test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (HP) in dyspepsia. Quick reference guide for primary care: for consultation and local adaptation [PHE, 2019], and the American College of Gastroenterology clinical guideline Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection [Chey, 2017]. It is also based on a Cochrane systematic review Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people [Ford, 2016], and expert opinion in review articles on dyspepsia [Ford, 2013] and peptic ulcer disease [Fashner, 2015].

Assessing for alarm symptoms
  • The recommendation on assessing for alarm symptoms and managing appropriately is based on expert opinion in the NICE clinical guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021].
Advice on lifestyle modification
  • The NICE clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management states that there is limited or inconclusive evidence from small trials on the benefits of lifestyle modification to reduce dyspepsia symptoms, however expert opinion from the guideline development group recommended these measures as they encourage self-management of dyspepsia and may have more general health benefits [NICE, 2019].
    • NICE notes that lifestyle advice may be less relevant for people with peptic ulcer disease as Helicobacter pylori eradication can cure peptic ulcer disease and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence rates.
    • Smoking has, however, been associated with peptic ulcer disease and CKS pragmatically recommends that cessation should be encouraged where appropriate.
Managing stress and anxiety
  • The recommendation on assessing for and managing associated stress, anxiety, and depression is extrapolated from the NICE recommendation to offer psychological treatments to people with functional dyspepsia, as this may reduce symptoms in the short-term [NICE, 2019].
Medication review
  • The recommendation on self-treating with antacid and/or alginate therapy is extrapolated from NICE recommendations on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) [NICE, 2019].
    • NICE noted that antacid and/or alginate medication is often prescribed by primary healthcare professionals, and is often used as over-the-counter medication. It may provide short-term symptom relief, but does not prevent dyspepsia symptoms.
  • The recommendation to consider reducing or stopping drugs that may cause or exacerbate peptic ulcer disease is based on expert opinion in the NICE clinical guideline [NICE, 2019], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report [Malfertheiner, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles [Ford, 2013; Fashner, 2015].
    • The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin increases the risk of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive people. The use of aspirin also increases the risk of bleeding in people with proven peptic ulcer disease [Malfertheiner, 2017].
Testing for Helicobacter pylori
  • The recommendations to use the carbon-13 urea breath test or stool antigen test for H. pylori detection in primary care is based on the expert opinion of the NICE guideline development group [NICE, 2019], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report [Malfertheiner, 2017], and guidance from PHE [PHE, 2019].
    • NICE found urea breath tests and stool antigen tests consistently accurate with about 95% sensitivity and specificity reported in studies.
    • PHE recommends avoiding antibiotics and PPIs prior to testing as these drugs can suppress H. pylori and therefore lead to false negative results.
    • NICE noted the poor positive predictive value of serological testing in populations with a low prevalence of H. pylori. In addition, serological testing cannot differentiate active infection from previous infection, resulting in an at least two-fold false positive rate compared with urea breath tests and stool antigen tests. This may result in potential over-treatment with eradication regimens and associated increased costs of treatment and increased antibiotic resistance rates. The information on the poor predictive value of serological testing was also supported by the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report [Malfertheiner, 2017].
    • Overall, the NICE guideline development group did not feel that serological testing performed adequately when compared with laboratory-based urea breath tests and stool antigen tests. In addition, the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report stated that serological test performance is dependent on the regional antigenic composition of the circulating strains of H. pylori, so if used, only locally validated tests are recommended.
Treating H. pylori infection in people who are H. pylori positive
  • The recommendations on treating H. pylori positive people are largely based on the conclusions of the NICE guideline development group [NICE, 2019] and the findings of a subsequent Cochrane systematic review [Ford, 2016].
    • The NICE clinical guideline states that H. pylori eradication is an effective and cost-effective option for ulcer healing in people with a proven duodenal but not gastric ulcer. In addition, H. pylori eradication is a cost-effective treatment for the prevention of recurrence of both duodenal and gastric ulcers, which reduces the need for maintenance acid suppression therapy.
    • The Cochrane systematic review examined data from 55 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a recognized H. pylori eradication regimen against placebo or other drug therapies in people with H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.
      • Low-quality evidence from 34 RCTs (n = 3910) compared H. pylori eradication and acid suppression therapy with acid suppression therapy alone, and found a small but statistically significant benefit of H. pylori eradication and acid suppression in the healing of duodenal ulcer, compared with acid suppression therapy alone.
      • In contrast, very low-quality evidence from 15 RCTs (n = 1974) which compared H. pylori eradication and acid suppression therapy with acid suppression therapy alone in the healing of gastric ulcer, found no statistically significant benefit of H. pylori eradication. There was significant heterogeneity between the trial results.
      • Very low-quality evidence from four RCTs (n = 319) compared H. pylori eradication therapy with maintenance ulcer-healing drug therapy in the prevention of recurrence of duodenal ulcer. It found no statistically significant benefit of one approach over the other in the prevention of ulcer recurrence. Further analysis of very low-quality evidence from 27 RCTs (n = 2509) found a statistically significant benefit of H. pylori eradication therapy compared with no treatment in the prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrence.
      • There was a similar benefit of H. pylori eradication compared with no treatment in very low-quality evidence from 12 RCTs (n = 1476) in the prevention of gastric ulcer recurrence. There was however, significant heterogeneity between trial results.
    • Consensus opinion in the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report also cites epidemiological evidence that H. pylori eradication may prevent peptic ulcer disease and reduce the risk of gastric malignancy [Malfertheiner, 2017].
First-line H. pylori eradication therapy
  • The recommendations on first-line H. pylori eradication regimens are largely based on guidance from NICE [NICE, 2019] and PHE [PHE, 2019].
  • NICE examined 12 RCTs (n = 2903) of 3–12 months duration, which found H. pylori eradication was more effective than placebo at reducing dyspepsia symptoms. Eradication rates of 80–85% were achieved using optimal triple therapies.
  • The recommendation to check for recent previous use of clarithromycin and metronidazole is based on a NICE literature review, which found that H. pylori eradication rates vary by geographical region, and this may be in part due to variable H. pylori antibiotic resistance rates to clarithromycin and metronidazole.
    • Once resistance rates to clarithromycin, for example, exceed 15–20%, this impacts on the eradication rates using clarithromycin in standard eradication regimens [Malfertheiner, 2017; NICE, 2019].
    • The NICE guideline development group suggested that clarithromycin or metronidazole use within the past year may constitute recent previous use.
    • PHE also notes that it is important to check the person's antibiotic history and stress the importance of complicance as each additional course of clarithromycin, metronidazole, or quinolone increases resistance risk .
  • NICE used 22 RCTs in a network meta-analysis of the efficacy of first-line eradication regimens, and data were pooled using pairwise meta-analysis for outcomes of adherence to medication, adverse events, and antibiotic resistance rates.
    • It found that the cost-effectiveness of each regimen was driven by its clinical effectiveness at eradicating H. pylori, and regimens containing at least two antibiotics were more cost-effective than proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy or dual therapy with a PPI and one antibiotic.
    • A network meta-analysis of very low-quality evidence for 15 eradication treatments demonstrated differences between triple and quadruple drug regimens, but it was not possible to confidently determine the best eradication regimen.
    • High-quality evidence from one study found that the regimen of a PPI with amoxicillin and clarithromycin is more effective when used for 7 or 10 days, when compared with a 3-day regimen.
    • Moderate-quality evidence from two studies found no difference in eradication rates for the triple regimen of a PPI with amoxicillin and clarithromycin compared with a quadruple regimen when used for at least 7 days.
    • Moderate- to high-quality evidence from two studies found that medication adherence was improved with 7-day regimens compared with a 14-day regimen.
    • NICE was unable to determine which regimen was likely to be cost-effective, due to the uncertainty in the clinical evidence available. It concluded that 7-day triple therapy of a PPI with amoxicillin and clarithromycin/metronidazole eradicated H. pylori in about 90% of cases. This is supported by the consensus opinion in the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report that states in areas of low clarithromycin resistance, triple therapy is recommended as first-line empirical therapy [Malfertheiner, 2017].
PPI or histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) therapy for people who are H. pylori negative
  • The recommendation to offer acid suppression with a full dose PPI or H2RA to people who test negative for H. pylori is based on expert opinion in the NICE clinical guideline [NICE, 2019].
Follow-up if refractory or recurrent symptoms
  • This recommendation is based on the NICE clinical guideline which states that for people testing positive for H. pylori, dyspepsia symptoms will persist over 3–12 months in 57% of people [NICE, 2019]. It is also pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

How should I follow up a person with proven peptic ulcer in primary care?

  • Assess for any new alarm symptoms which may suggest a complication or other serious underlying pathology, and manage appropriately. See the CKS topic on Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • Ensure all people with a proven gastric ulcer have a repeat endoscopy to confirm healing, and Helicobacter pylori re-testing (if appropriate) arranged 6–8 weeks after starting first-line H. pylori eradication and/or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Note: H. pylori re-testing may be performed during follow-up endoscopic examination in secondary care.
    • Offer the carbon-13 urea breath test first-line, or the stool antigen test second-line if the carbon-13 urea breath test is not available — ensure the person has not taken a PPI in the past 2 weeks, or antibiotics in the past 4 weeks.
    • In people with an unhealed ulcer, exclude non-adherence, malignancy, failure to detect H pylori, inadvertent NSAID use, other ulcer‑inducing medication, and rare causes such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.
    • If a proven gastric ulcer has healed on repeat endoscopy, but symptoms recur, offer a PPI to be taken at the lowest dose possible to control symptoms. Discuss using the treatment on an 'as-needed' basis. If there is no response:
    • If a proven gastric ulcer has healed on repeat endoscopy and the person is taking a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or aspirin and is unable to stop the drug, advise on:
      • Reducing the NSAID dose, if possible, and offering long-term gastroprotection with acid suppression therapy.
      • Switching to an alternative to a NSAID, such as paracetamol or a cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on NSAIDs - prescribing issues for more information.
      • Switching to an alternative antiplatelet drug, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Antiplatelet treatment for more information.
  • Offer people with a proven gastric or duodenal ulcer on long-term treatment an annual review of their symptoms and treatment, and encourage the person to:
    • Step down or stop treatment, if possible and appropriate (if there is no co-morbidity or co-medication that requires long-term acid suppression therapy):
    • Use a PPI or H2RA at the lowest effective dose to control symptoms.
    • Use a PPI or H2RA as needed, if possible and appropriate.
    • Consider self-treatment with antacid and/or alginate therapy, although this is not recommended for long-term or continuous use.
  • Advise a person with a proven gastric or duodenal ulcer to arrange a follow-up appointment if there are refractory or recurrent symptoms.
  • Arrange a referral to a gastroenterologist, for possible specialist investigations and management if:
    • There are refractory or recurrent symptoms despite optimal management in primary care.
    • Treatment with a second-line H. pylori eradication regimen has been unsuccessful.
    • There are limited antibiotic options for H. pylori eradication therapy, due to hypersensitivity, known local high antibiotic resistance rates, or previous use of clarithromycin, metronidazole, and a quinolone.
    • A proven gastric ulcer has not healed on repeat endoscopy following H. pylori eradication (if appropriate) and/or PPI therapy.
    • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or another non-peptic cause of ulcer disease is suspected.

Second-line H. pylori eradication regimens

Second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens consist of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) together with a combination of antibiotics (taking into account previous exposure to clarithromycin, metronidazole, or levofloxacin), and in some cases bismuth (a chelate). Ensure the person is aware of the importance of compliance with the prescribed regimen.

  • NICE recommend the use of the following PPI doses:
    • Lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20–40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, or rabeprazole 20 mg.
  • If a person has ongoing symptoms following first-line eradication and H. pylori re-testing is positive, offer a 7-day triple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and amoxicillin 1 g twice-daily and
    • Either clarithromycin 500 mg twice-daily or metronidazole twice-daily 400 mg (whichever was not used first-line).
  • If the person has had previous exposure to clarithromycin and metronidazole, offer a 7-day triple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and amoxicillin 1 g twice-daily and
    • Either levofloxacin 250 mg twice-daily or tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg four times a day.
  • If the person is allergic to penicillin and has not had previous exposure to levofloxacin, offer a 7- day triple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and metronidazole 400 mg twice-daily and levofloxacin 250 mg twice-daily.
  • If the person is allergic to penicillin and has had previous exposure to levofloxacin, offer a 7-day quadruple therapy regimen of:
    • A PPI twice-daily and bismuth subsalicylate 525 mg four times a day and metronidazole 400 mg twice-daily and tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg four times a day.

[NICE, 2019; PHE, 2019; BNF, 2022]

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the follow up of people with proven peptic ulcer disease are largely based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report Management of Helicobacter pylori infection [Malfertheiner, 2017], the Public Health England (PHE) guideline Test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (HP) in dyspepsia. Quick reference guide for primary care: for consultation and local adaptation [PHE, 2019], and the American College of Gastroenterology clinical guideline Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection [Chey, 2017]. It is also based on a Cochrane systematic review Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer (Review) [Gurusamy, 2016] and expert opinion in review articles on peptic ulcer disease [Fashner, 2015; Lanas, 2017].

Assessing for new alarm symptoms
  • The recommendation on assessing for alarm symptoms and managing appropriately is based on the NICE clinical guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021].
Repeat endoscopy for proven gastric ulcer
  • The recommendations on ensuring a repeat endoscopy has been arranged for people with a proven gastric ulcer to confirm ulcer healing and exclude occult gastric malignancy, are based on expert opinion in the NICE clinical guideline [NICE, 2019].

Stopping or reducing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin use, if appropriate
  • These recommendations are largely based on the NICE clinical guideline which recommends that regular use of NSAIDs should be minimized where possible in people with existing or previous peptic ulcer disease, as NSAID use is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and other complications. The risk of gastrointestinal injury increases for higher doses of the same NSAID [NICE, 2019].
    • In addition, stopping NSAIDs increases the likelihood of peptic ulcer healing and reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence.
    • NICE states that in people with previous ulceration for whom NSAID continuation is necessary, a COX-2 selective NSAID instead of a standard NSAID should be considered. A PPI should be prescribed concurrently whcihever class of drug is chosen.
    • The Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report also advises that gastroprotection with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is needed for all people taking NSAIDs, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin after a peptic ulcer bleed [Malfertheiner, 2017].
    • This is further supported by expert opinion in review articles on peptic ulcer disease, which recommend stopping or reducing the dose of NSAID, switching to a COX-2 inhibitor, or starting PPI therapy as options to reduce the risk of recurrent ulceration and complications in people taking NSAIDs [Fashner, 2015; Lanas, 2017].
Re-testing for Helicobacter pylori infection
  • The recommendations on arranging H. pylori re-testing for people with gastric and duodenal ulcer are based on the NICE clinical guideline [NICE, 2019], the PHE guideline [PHE, 2019], and the ACG clinical guideline [Chey, 2017].
    • H. pylori infection, NSAIDs, and aspirin are independent risk factors for peptic ulcer disease and complications such as ulcer bleeding, and eradication therapy reduces this risk. This is supported by the ACG clinical guideline which states that people taking low-dose aspirin or NSAIDs should be tested for H. pylori to reduce the risk of bleeding peptic ulcer disease.
    • Detecting and treating H. pylori infection can also reduce the risk of peptic ulcer recurrence.
    • Persistent H. pylori infection is a risk factor for developing gastric malignancy in people with an unhealed gastric ulcer.
  • The recommendations on how to re-test for H. pylori for people with proven gastric and duodenal ulcer are based on the NICE clinical guideline [NICE, 2019], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report Management of Helicobacter pylori infection [Malfertheiner, 2017], and the Public Health England (PHE) guideline Test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (HP) in dyspepsia. Quick reference guide for primary care: for consultation and local adaptation [PHE, 2019].
    • If H. pylori re-testing is indicated, the NICE clinical guideline recommends use of the carbon-13 urea breath test, as it found insufficient evidence to recommend the stool antigen test or serological testing. It found urea breath tests to be consistently accurate with about 95% sensitivity and specificity reported in studies.
    • PHE and consensus opinion in the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report also recommends the urea breath test for re-testing, but states that the stool antigen test is an alternative option if the carbon-13 urea breath test is unavailable, and that re-testing should be performed at least 4–8 weeks after completion of H. pylori eradication therapy.
    • Serological testing cannot differentiate active infection from previous infection, resulting in an at-least two-fold false positive rate compared with urea breath tests and stool antigen tests [NICE, 2019]. This may result in potential over-treatment with eradication regimens and associated increased costs of treatment and increased antibiotic resistance rates [Malfertheiner, 2017; NICE, 2019].
    • CKS notes that people with a proven gastric ulcer should have a repeat endoscopy performed at 6–8 weeks after starting drug treatment, and H. pylori re-testing may be performed at the same time as the endoscopic procedure.
Second-line H. pylori eradication therapy
  • The recommendations on second-line H. pylori eradication regimens are largely based on expert opinion in guidance from NICE [NICE, 2019] and PHE [PHE, 2019].
    • NICE found that the cost-effectiveness of each regimen was driven by its clinical effectiveness at eradicating H. pylori, and regimens containing at least two antibiotics were more cost-effective than PPI monotherapy or dual therapy with a PPI and one antibiotic.
      • A network meta-analysis of low- to very-low quality evidence showed there were some differences between triple and quadruple drug regimens, but it was not possible to confidently determine the best eradication regimen.
      • There was no evidence that extending eradication treatment beyond 7 days increased the efficacy of the regimen, and a 7-day regimen may improve medication adherence compared with longer durations of treatment.
      • NICE and PHE highlighted the importance of assessing the person's previous antibiotic exposure, as H. pylori may become resistant after limited exposure.
Offering PPI or histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) therapy if ongoing symptoms
  • The recommendation on offering acid suppression therapy if there are refractory or recurrent symptoms is based on expert opinion in guidance from NICE [NICE, 2019] and PHE [PHE, 2019].
    • Limited evidence from short-term trials showed that both PPIs and H2RAs can reduce dyspepsia symptoms, although the evidence supporting PPI use was stronger.
Stepping down or stopping treatment
  • The recommendations on stepping down or stopping acid suppression treatment are based on guidance from NICE [NICE, 2019] and PHE [PHE, 2019].
    • The recommendation on using the lowest effective PPI dose to control symptoms is to reduce the risks of adverse effects associated with long-term PPI use, and is considered a more cost-effective option than continuous PPI use.
    • The recommendation to use a PPI as needed, if possible, is extrapolated from evidence on the management of people with endoscopy-negative reflux disease that found this is a cost-effective option to promote patient self-management of their condition.
    • The recommendation on self-treating with antacid and/or alginate therapy is extrapolated from NICE recommendations on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
      • NICE noted that antacid and/or alginate medication is often prescribed by primary healthcare professionals, and is often used as over-the-counter medication. It may provide short-term symptom relief, but does not prevent dyspepsia symptoms.
Arranging specialist referral
  • The recommendations on arranging referral to a gastroenterologist for a specialist opinion are largely based on guidance from NICE [NICE, 2019] and PHE [PHE, 2019], and a Cochrane systematic review [Gurusamy, 2016].
    • People with recurrent or refractory symptoms despite optimal management in primary care may need repeat endoscopy or other specialist investigations to rule out refractory peptic ulcer disease, ulcers with non-peptic aetiologies, or occult upper intestinal malignancy.
    • PHE states that third-line H. pylori eradication should only be offered on the advice of a specialist, and recommends referral if there are limited antibiotic options to use for H. pylori eradication therapy.
    • Surgical treatments for refractory peptic ulcer disease include antrectomy with a gastro-duodenal anastomosis or gastro-jejunal anastomosis, a vagotomy and pyloroplasty, or a highly-selective vagotomy. The NICE clinical guideline notes, however, that this surgery is now rarely performed.
      • A Cochrane systematic review of people with recurrent or refractory peptic ulcer disease found a lack of evidence for the relative benefits of medical compared with surgical treatment [Gurusamy, 2016].
Fluoroquinolone use
  • Systemic fluoroquinolones can cause long lasting disabling and potentially irreversible side effects which can affect multiple body systems. The indications for systemic fluoroquinolones should be restricted to situations when other antibiotics, commonly recommended for an infection, are inappropriate such as [MHRA, 2023]:
    • Resistance to other first-line antibiotics.
    • First-line antibiotics are contraindicated.
    • First-line antibiotics have caused adverse effects requiring treatment to be stopped.
    • Treatment with first-line antibiotics has failed. 

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Proton pump inhibitors

Choice of proton pump inhibitor

  • Table 1 shows the recommended doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of people with dyspepsia symptoms.

Table 1. PPI doses for the management of people with dyspepsia symptoms.

PPI

Full or standard dose

Low dose (on-demand dose)

Double dose

Omeprazole20 mg once a day* 10 mg once a day40 mg once a day
Lansoprazole30 mg once a day15 mg once a day* 30 mg twice a day
Pantoprazole40 mg once a day20 mg once a day* 40 mg twice a day
Rabeprazole20 mg once a day10 mg once a day* 20 mg twice a day
Esomeprazole† 20 mg once a dayNot available‡ 40 mg once a day
Doses should be given 30 minutes before breakfast and (if needed) 30 minutes before the evening meal, to provide optimal control of gastric pH.
* Off-label dose for GORD.
† This is lower than the licensed starting dose in GORD, but is considered to be dose-equivalent to other PPIs.
‡ This dose is recommended for double dose, because the 20 mg dose of esomeprazole is considered to be equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg.
Data from: [NICE, 2019]
  • Table 2 shows the recommended doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the H. pylori eradication therapy.

Table 2. PPI doses for H. pylori eradication therapy.

PPI

Dose

Omeprazole20–40 mg twice daily
Lansoprazole30 mg twice daily
Pantoprazole40 mg twice daily
Rabeprazole20 mg twice daily
Esomeprazole20 mg twice daily
Data from: [NICE, 2019]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) should not be prescribed to people:
    • With alarm symptoms before endoscopy, as PPIs may mask the symptoms of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. If the person is already taking a PPI and subsequently needs an endoscopy, the PPI should be stopped at least 2 weeks before the procedure.
  • PPIs should be prescribed with caution to people:
    • At risk of osteoporosis — the person should maintain an adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, and if necessary, be given additional bone-sparing therapy.
    • At risk of hypomagnesaemia — if possible, magnesium levels should be checked before starting PPI therapy and intermittently during long-term treatment, for example if the person is prescribed drugs that can cause hypomagnesaemia, such as digoxin and diuretics.

[MHRA, 2012a; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are usually mild and reversible.

  • Adverse effects include headache, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and dizziness.
  • Less common adverse effects include dry mouth, peripheral oedema, sleep disturbance, fatigue, paraesthesia, arthralgia, myalgia, pruritus, and rash.
  • Rare or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), which can occur weeks, months, or years after exposure to a PPI. If suspected discontinue the PPI and seek specialist advice if needed [MHRA, 2015].
    • Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported very rarely, and rarely with omeprazole treatment.
    • Taste disturbance, hepatitis, jaundice, depression, confusion, hallucinations, hyponatraemia, interstitial nephritis, leucopenia, leucocytosis, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, visual disturbances, sweating, photophobia, and alopecia.
  • Long-term PPI treatment may be associated with uncommon, serious adverse effects such as:
    • Hypomagnesaemia — symptoms include muscle twitching, tremors, vomiting, fatigue, and loss of appetite. Case reports after one year of PPI therapy, but may occur after 3 months. This usually improves after magnesium replacement therapy and discontinuation of the PPI [MHRA, 2012a]. Hypomagnesaemia may lead to hypocalcaemia and/or hypokalaemia.
    • Increased risk of fractures — especially when used at high doses for over a year in the elderly [MHRA, 2012b].
    • Clostridium difficile infection — due to the effect of decreasing gastric acidity.
    • Rebound acid hypersecretion syndrome — may occur after stopping long-term PPI therapy, although this may be more a theoretical risk than clinical phenomenon.

[NICE, 2019; BNF, 2022; ABPI, 2022a]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) include:

  • Citalopram and escitalopram — co-exposure to omeprazole or esomeprazole can lead to increased levels of citalopram and escitalopram. Dose adjustment may be necessary depending on side-effects.
  • Digoxin — PPIs may cause a small rise in serum digoxin levels (although not considered clinically significant). The manufacturer of lansoprazole suggests that digoxin levels should be monitored if lansoprazole is started or stopped.
  • Warfarin — PPIs can occasionally enhance the effects of warfarin. The international normalized ratio (INR) should be monitored in people taking warfarin if omeprazole, pantoprazole, or esomeprazole is started or stopped.
  • Methotrexate — PPIs possibly reduce excretion of methotrexate, leading to an increased risk of methotrexate toxicity.
  • Phenytoin — omeprazole and esomeprazole can occasionally enhance the effects of phenytoin. The manufacturers recommend that people taking phenytoin are carefully monitored if omeprazole or esomeprazole is started or stopped.
  • Azole antifungals — the absorption of ketoconazole or itraconazole may be reduced during PPI treatment. Dose adjustment of the antifungal drug may be required during long-term PPI treatment.
  • Clopidogrel — omeprazole and esomeprazole reduce the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, and concomitant use should be avoided. The other PPIs may also reduce the efficacy of clopidogrel, and this risk should be weighed against the potential benefit of the PPI [MHRA, (2010)].
  • Protease inhibitors — PPIs can significantly affect plasma levels of some protease inhibitor drugs, including:
    • Atazanavir — concurrent use of PPIs and atazanavir is not recommended as the absorption of atazanavir may be affected by a PPI (due to changes in gastric acidity). This may lead to a reduced plasma concentration of atazanavir which may affect its efficacy. If concurrent use is necessary, seek specialist advice.
    • Saquinavir — plasma concentration of saquinavir may be increased by PPI treatment, leading to increased risk of adverse effects.
    • Tipranavir — concurrent use with omeprazole or esomeprazole is not recommended, as tipranavir may reduce the plasma concentration of the PPI. If concurrent use is necessary, seek specialist advice.

 [ABPI, 2021; BNF, 2022; Preston, 2023]

H2-receptor antagonists

Choice of H2-receptor antagonist

  • Table 2 shows the recommended doses of ranitidine, famotidine, and nizatidine histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for the management of people with peptic ulcer disease.

Table 2. Recommended doses of H2RAs for the management of people with peptic ulcer disease.

H2RA

Usual treatment dose

Ranitidine*150 mg twice a day (or 300 mg at night)
Famotidine40 mg at night (20 mg at night maintenance dose)
Nizatidine150 mg twice a day or 300 mg in the evening (150 mg at night maintenance dose)

*Ranitidine not currently avilable in the UK or globally

Note: cimetidine is also licensed for the treatment of dyspepsia symptoms, however it is not recommended as there is a higher risk of drug interactions, due to inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Data from: [BNF, 2022]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) should not be prescribed to people:
    • With alarm symptoms before endoscopy, as H2RAs may mask the symptoms of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. If the person is already taking an H2RA and subsequently needs an endoscopy, the H2RA should be stopped at least 2 weeks before the procedure.
  • H2RAs should be prescribed with caution in people with renal impairment:
    • For ranitidine, if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 50 mL/minute/1.73m2, prescribe half the normal daily dose.
    • For famotidine, if the eGFR is less than 50 mL/minute/1.73m2, prescribe the normal dose once every 36–48 hours, or half the normal daily dose.
    • For nizatidine, if the eGFR is 20–50 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe half the normal daily dose; if the eGFR is less than 20 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one-quarter of the normal daily dose.
  • Nizatidine should be prescribed with caution for people with hepatic impairment.

[NICE, 2019; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • Adverse effects of histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are uncommon and include diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, rash, and tiredness.
  • Rare or very rare adverse effects include hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice, bradycardia, depression, confusion, hallucinations, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia, arthralgia, and myalgia.

[BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

  • Possible drug interactions with histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) include:
    • Azole antifungals — because of decreased gastric acidity, the absorption of ketoconazole or itraconazole may be reduced if taken with an H2RA.
    • Protease inhibitors — atazanavir plasma levels are reduced by H2RAs. The manufacturer of atazanavir advises adjustment of the doses of both drugs when given with an H2RA. Seek specialist advice as needed.

[BNF, 2022]

Amoxicillin

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe amoxicillin to people with:
    • A true penicillin hypersensitivity – gastrointestinal adverse effects alone (such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea) do not constitute an allergy to penicillin.
    • History of penicillin-associated hepatic dysfunction.
  • Prescribe amoxicillin with caution to people with:
    • Hypersensitivity to cephalosporins.
    • Hepatic impairment.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 or 5 — reduce the dose of amoxicillin.
      • If the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 10–30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe a maximum of 500 mg twice a day.
      • If the eGFR is less than 10 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe a maximum of 500 mg once a day.

[ABPI, 2022b; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • The most common adverse effects of penicillins include diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, and skin rash.
  • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with amoxicillin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Anaphylaxis (immediate or delayed) is a serious but rare adverse effect of amoxicillin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.

[ABPI, 2022b; BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with amoxicillin include:

  • Allopurinol — concomitant use of allopurinol and amoxicillin may increase the incidence of skin rashes. Concomitant use need not be avoided for this reason.
  • Anticoagulants (for example warfarin) — monitor the prothrombin time or international normalized ratio (INR) more closely with the addition or withdrawal of a penicillin. Adjustment of the anticoagulant dose may be necessary. Prolongation of prothrombin time has been reported in people taking penicillins and warfarin concurrently.
  • Methotrexate — monitor methotrexate levels more closely. One recommendation is to carry out twice weekly platelet and white cell counts for 2 weeks initially, with the measurement of methotrexate levels if toxicity is suspected. Penicillins may reduce the excretion of methotrexate, however clinically this is not usually serious.
  • Tetracyclines — effect of penicillins possibly antagonized by tetracyclines.

[ABPI, 2022b; BNF, 2022]

Clarithromycin

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe clarithromycin to people with:
    • Severe hepatic impairment in combination with renal impairment.
    • Hypokalaemia — risk of prolongation of the QT interval.
    • A history of QT prolongation or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia, including Torsades de pointes.
  • Prescribe clarithromycin with caution to people with:
    • Impaired hepatic function (or people concomitantly taking potentially hepatotoxic drugs) — clarithromycin is principally excreted by the liver. Hepatic dysfunction including increased liver enzymes and cholestatic hepatitis (with or without jaundice) has been reported rarely.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 — if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe half the normal dose, and avoid Klaricid XL® or clarithromycin M/R preparations.
    • Coronary heart disease, severe cardiac insufficiency, hypomagnesaemia, or bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats per minute) — increased risk of QT prolongation.
    • Myasthenia gravis — may aggravate symptoms.

[ABPI, 2022c; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • The most common adverse effects of clarithromycin include mild nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhoea.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with clarithromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Taste disturbance, headache, insomnia, and hyperhidrosis have also been reported.
  • Hepatotoxicity (including cholestatic jaundice) and rash are reported less frequently.
  • Other adverse effects reported rarely or very rarely include pancreatitis, QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
  • Anaphylaxis is rarely associated with clarithromycin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.

[ABPI, 2022c; BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with clarithromycin include:

  • Carbamazepine — clarithromycin increases the plasma concentration of carbamazepine. Consider reducing the dose of carbamazepine by 30–50% during treatment with clarithromycin. Advise the person to report symptoms of carbamazepine toxicity (such as dizziness, diplopia, ataxia, or confusion).
  • Colchicine — clarithromycin possibly increases the risk of colchicine toxicity. Stop or reduce the dose of colchicine, and avoid concomitant use is renal or hepatic impairment.
  • Drugs that prolong the QT interval (such as anti-arrhythmics like amiodarone and sotalol, antipsychotics like amisulpride, domperidone, and tricyclic antidepressants) — seek advice from a medical microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic. Macrolides can also prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of arrhythmias such as Torsades de pointes, and concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval is not recommended.
  • Drugs that cause hypokalaemia (such as diuretics, corticosteroids, short-acting beta2-agonists) — seek advice from a medical microbiologist regarding a suitable alternative antibiotic. Hypokalaemia is a risk factor for QT prolongation.
  • Edoxaban — manufacturer advises caution with concurrent treatment with edoxaban, particularly in those with a high risk of bleeding.
  • Itraconazole — clarithromycin increases the plasma concentration of itraconazole, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
  • Ivabradine — concomitant treatment is contraindicated, owing to CYP3A4 inhibition by clarithromycin which can cause elevated levels of ivabradine.
  • Ketoconazole — the manufacturer advises to avoid the use of concomitant clarithromycin in severe renal impairment.
  • Mirabegron — when given with clarithromycin, avoid or reduce the dose of mirabegron in renal or hepatic impairment.
  • Omeprazole — the plasma concentrations of both drugs are increased when clarithromycin is given with omeprazole.
  • Phenytoin — clarithromycin inhibits the metabolism of phenytoin, leading to increased plasma concentrations. If there are signs of phenytoin toxicity (such as blurred vision, nystagmus, ataxia, or drowsiness), stop clarithromycin and seek specialist advice if needed.
  • Sildenafil — clarithromycin increases the plasma concentration of sildenafil. Consider reducing the initial dose for sildenafil.
  • Statins — there is an increased risk of myopathy (due to cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 inhibition) if clarithromycin is taken with atorvastatin or simvastatin.
    • For simvastatin — avoid concomitant use, as simvastatin is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. If clarithromycin treatment cannot be avoided, stop treatment with simvastatin during the course of the treatment.
    • For atorvastatin — avoid concurrent use with clarithromycin as atorvastatin is moderately metabolized by CYP3A4. If concurrent use cannot be avoided, prescribe the lowest starting dose of atorvastatin (that is 10 mg), and advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
    • Other statins — clinically significant drug interactions resulting from cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism are not expected for rosuvastatin and pravastatin as they are not metabolized to a clinically significant extent by the cytochrome P450 system. Fluvastatin is not dependent on CYP3A metabolism, therefore interaction with clarithromycin is unlikely. Nevertheless, advise the person to report any muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness.
  • Theophylline — clarithromycin possibly increases the plasma concentration of theophylline. Consider a dose reduction of theophylline if toxicity is suspected (for example headache, nausea, or palpitations occur).
  • Quetiapine — clarithromycin possibly increases the plasma concentration of quetiapine. The manufacturer of quetiapine advises to avoid concomitant use.
  • Warfarin — clarithromycin enhances the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, and occasionally this may be a marked effect. Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Antidiabetic drugs — the concurrent use of clarithromycin and antidiabetic drugs (such as nateglinide and repaglinide) can result in significant hypoglycaemia. Monitor blood glucose levels more regularly and adjust the antidiabetic drug dose accordingly.
  • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) — clarithromycin possibly inhibits the metabolism of CCBs, increasing the risk of adverse effects such as hypotension.

[BNF, 2022; EMC, 2024]

Metronidazole

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe metronidazole to a person with:
    • Known metronidazole or nitroimidazole hypersensitivity.
    • Cockayne syndrome. Cases of severe hepatotoxicity/acute hepatic failure, including cases with a fatal outcome with very rapid onset after treatment initiation in patients with Cockayne syndrome have been reported with products containing metronidazole for systemic use (oral and suppositories). For people with Cockayne syndrome specialist advice should therefore be sought before prescribing metronidazole.
  • Prescribe metronidazole with caution to people with:
    • Active or chronic severe peripheral and central nervous system disease, as there is a risk of neurological aggravation.
    • Severe liver disease or hepatic encephalopathy, due to substantial impairment of metronidazole clearance, which may contribute to symptoms of encephalopathy. Prescribe one-third of the daily dosage once daily.
    • Alcohol dependency — there may be a disulfiram-like reaction if taken with alcohol.

[EMC, 2022; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects of metronidazole include:  

  • Gastrointestinal disturbances including nausea and vomiting, anorexia, and very rarely hepatitis, jaundice, or pancreatitis.
  • Taste disturbances, furred tongue, oral mucositis.
  • Headache, ataxia.
  • Thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia. 
  • Myalgia, arthralgia.
  • Darkening of urine.
  • Rash, pruritus, and erythema multiforme.
  • Drowsiness, dizziness, confusion, hallucinations, convulsions, or transient visual disorders. Advise the person not to drive or operate machinery if these symptoms occur.
  • Severe bullous skin reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) or acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported. If symptoms/signs are present, treatment must be immediately discontinued.

[EMC, 2022; BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

Drug interactions associated with metronidazole include:

  • Alcohol — some people taking metronidazole experience a disulfiram-like reaction with alcohol.
    • Warn the person that they might experience this reaction if they drink alcohol whilst on metronidazole and for at least 48 hours afterwards. 
  • Anticoagulants — the anticoagulant effects of warfarin can be markedly increased by metronidazole. 
    • Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR) and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly. 
  • Ciclosporin — if co-administration of metronidazole and ciclosporin is necessary, serum ciclosporin levels and serum creatinine should be closely monitored.
  • Cimetidine — metabolism of metronidazole inhibited by cimetidine, resulting in an increased plasma concentration.
  • Lithium — seek specialist advice regarding the use of metronidazole with lithium, as metronidazole increases the risk of lithium toxicity. Lithium dose reduction may be required due to the risk of renal damage with concurrent use. Plasma concentrations of lithium, creatinine, and electrolytes should be monitored if metronidazole and lithium are used simultaneously.
  • Phenytoin — metronidazole possibly inhibits the metabolism of phenytoin, leading to increased plasma concentrations.

[EMC, 2022; BNF, 2022; Preston, 2023]

Tetracycline

Contraindications and cautions

  • Do not prescribe tetracycline to people with:
    • Renal impairment — tetracyclines are excreted renally and may exacerbate renal failure.
  • Prescribe tetracycline with caution to people with:
    • Hepatic impairment and those receiving potentially hepatotoxic drugs, such as carbamazepine, isoniazid, and methotrexate.
    • Myasthenia gravis — tetracyclines may increase muscle weakness symptoms.
    • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) — tetracyclines may exacerbate the condition.

[ABPI, 2020; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • Common adverse effects of tetracycline include:
    • Gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.
      • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with tetracycline. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
    • Dysphagia and oesophageal irritation.
  • Other rare adverse effects of tetracyclines include:
    • Severe headache and/or visual disturbance — may be an early symptom of benign intracranial hypertension. Stop treatment and seek immediate medical advice if this is suspected.
    • Severe oesophagitis.
    • Vulvovaginal candidiasis.
    • Photosensitivity.
    • Hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis.

[ABPI, 2020; BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with tetracycline include:

  • Antacids (containing aluminium, bismuth, calcium, or magnesium) and other medications containing iron or zinc — these reduce the absorption of tetracyclines if taken concurrently.
    • Avoid taking antacids and other medications containing iron or zinc, 2 hours before or after taking tetracyclines.
  • Anticoagulants — the concurrent use of warfarin with tetracyclines can increase the anticoagulant effect of coumarins.
    • Monitor the person's international normalized ratio (INR) regularly and within 3 days of starting the tetracycline. Adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Retinoids — there is a possible increased risk of benign intracranial pressure if tetracyclines are used concurrently with retinoids.
    • Avoid the concurrent use of tetracyclines and retinoids.
  • Milk — the absorption of most tetracyclines is reduced by the calcium found in milk and other dairy products.
  • Carbamazepine — doxycycline levels are reduced significantly in people taking long-term carbamazepine.
  • Penicillins — tetracyclines possibly antagonize the effects of penicillins.
  • Sulfonylureas — tetracyclines possibly enhance the hypoglycaemic effects of sulfonylureas.
  • Tripotassium dicitratobismuthate — absorption of tetracyclines is reduced.

[ABPI, 2020; BNF, 2022]

Levofloxacin

Contraindications and cautions

  • Note that systemic fluoroquinolones must now only be prescribed when other commonly recommended antibiotics are inappropriate. This follows a review by the MHRA which looked at the effectiveness of current measures to reduce the identified risk of disabling and potentially long-lasting or irreversible side effects.
  • Do not prescribe levofloxacin to people with:
    • A history of serious adverse reactions with a quinolone antibiotic (for example, nalidixic acid) or a fluoroquinolone antibiotic.
  • Prescribe levofloxacin with caution to people with:
    • A history of epilepsy or a condition that predisposes to seizures — quinolones may induce seizures.
    • An age greater than 60 years, with renal impairment, or solid-organ transplants, as these people are at a higher risk of tendon injury.
    • Conditions which may prolong the QT interval (for example, electrolyte disturbances, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, bradycardia, a history of symptomatic arrhythmias, and concomitant use of other drugs known to prolong the QT interval).
    • An increased risk of tendon damage (for example, people taking concomitant corticosteroids) — tendon damage (including rupture) has been reported rarely in people taking quinolones.
    • Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 — if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 20–50 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe the usual initial dose then half the normal levofloxacin dose.
    • Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency — possible increased risk of acute haemolytic anaemia when taking quinolones.
    • A history of psychiatric illness.
    • Myasthenia gravis — there is a risk of exacerbation of symptoms.

[BNF, 2022; MHRA, 2023]

Adverse effects

  • Adverse effects of levofloxacin include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, and dizziness.
    • Consider pseudomembranous colitis if a person develops severe diarrhoea during or after treatment with levofloxacin. For more information, see the CKS topic on Diarrhoea - antibiotic associated.
  • Less frequent adverse effects include:
    • Dyspepsia, abdominal pain, anorexia, sleep disturbances, confusion, anxiety, depression, hallucinations, seizures, and tremors. Quinolones may lower the seizure threshold and may trigger seizures. Levofloxacin is contraindicated in patients with a history of epilepsy and, as with other quinolones, should be used with extreme caution in patients predisposed to seizures, or concomitant treatment with active substances that lower the cerebral seizure threshold, such as theophylline. In case of convulsive seizures, treatment with levofloxacin should be discontinued.
    • Blood disorders (including eosinophilia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia), arthralgia, tendinitis, tendon rupture, myalgia, rash (very rarely Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), disturbances in vision and taste, and photosensitivity.
  • Patients should be advised to stop fluoroquinolone treatment at the first signs of a serious adverse reaction, such as tendinitis or tendon rupture, muscle pain, muscle weakness, joint pain, joint swelling, peripheral neuropathy or central nervous system effects. Remain alert to the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours with use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. 

Report suspected adverse drug reactions to fluoroquinolone antibiotics on the Yellow Card website: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/.

[BNF, 2022; MHRA, 2023]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with levofloxacin include:

  • Amiodarone — increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias when levofloxacin is given with amiodarone. Avoid concomitant use.
  • Antacids — absorption of levofloxacin reduced by antacids. Give at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after levofloxacin.
  • Anticoagulants — levofloxacin possibly increases the anticoagulant effect of drugs such as warfarin. Monitor the international normalized ratio (INR), and adjust the warfarin dose accordingly.
  • Corticosteroids — avoid co-administration of a corticosteroid with a fluoroquinolone since this could exacerbate fluoroquinolone-induced tendinitis and tendon rupture.
  • Iron salts and zinc — absorption of levofloxacin reduced by oral iron salts. Give at least 2 hours apart.
  • Aminophylline and theophylline — possible increased risk of convulsions when levofloxacin is given with aminophylline and theophylline.
  • Ciclosporin — increased risk of nephrotoxicity when levofloxacin is given with ciclosporin.
  • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) — possible increased risk of convulsions when levofloxacin is given with NSAIDs.
  • Zolmitriptan — levofloxacin possibly inhibits the metabolism of zolmitriptan. Reduce the dose of zolmitriptan.

[BNF, 2022; MHRA, 2023]

Bismuth

Contraindications and cautions

  • Bismuth subsalicylate should not be precribed to people with a history of hypersenitivity to aspirin or other salicylates.
  • Prescribe bismuth subsalicylate with caution to people with:
    • Gout.
    • Blood clotting disorders.

[BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • Bismuth subsalicylate may darken the tongue and cause black stools.

[BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

  • Possible drug interactions with bismuth subsalicycate include:
    • Tetracyclines — bismuth reduces the absorption of tetracyclines.

[BNF, 2022]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], the Public Health England (PHE) guideline Test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (HP) in dyspepsia. Quick reference guide for primary care: for consultation and local adaptation [PHE, 2019], the American College of Gastroenterology clinical guideline Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection [Chey, 2017], the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report Management of Helicobacter pylori infection [Malfertheiner, 2017], and expert opinion in review articles. The rationale for the individual recommendations is discussed in the basis for recommendation sections. CKS has not summarized the evidence for secondary care investigations and management as they are beyond the scope of this topic.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of Dyspepsia - proven peptic ulcer.

Search dates

May 2017 - Novemeber 2022

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp peptic ulcer/ or ((peptic or gastric or duodenal or stomach or oesophageal or esophageal) AND ulcer*).tw.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2020) SPC for Tetracycline Tablets BP 250mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2021) SPC for Citalopram 10mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2022a) SPC for Losec capsules 10mg. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2022b) SPC for Amoxicillin 250 mg Capsules. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2022c) SPC for Clarithromycin 250 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2022) Peptic ulcer disease. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
  • BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Chey, W.D., Leontiadis, G.I., Howden, C.W. and Moss, S.F. (2017) ACG clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. American Journal of Gastroenterology 112(2), 212-238. [Abstract]
  • EMC (2022) SPC for Metronidazole 200 mg Film-Coated Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2024) SPC for clarithromycin 250 mg/5 ml granules for oral suspension. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
  • Fashner, J. and Gitu, A.C. (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection. American Academy of Family Physicians 91(4), 236-242. [Abstract]
  • Ford, A.C. and Moayyedi, P. (2013) Dyspepsia. British Medical Journal 347, 1-5. [Abstract]
  • Ford, A.C., Gurusamy, K.S., Delaney, B., et al. (2016) Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive people (Cochrane Review). Issue 4. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Gurusamy, K.S. and Pallari, E. (2016) Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer (Cochrane Review). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. www.cochranelibrary.com/ [Free Full-text]
  • Lanas, A. and Chan, F.K.L. (2017) Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet 6736(16), 1-12. [Abstract]
  • Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., O'Morain, C.A., et al. (2017) Management of Helicobacterr pylori infection - the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut 66, 6-30.
  • MHRA (2010) Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: interaction - updated advice. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2012a) Proton pump inhibitors in long term use: reports of hypomagnesaemia. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2012b) Proton pump inhibitors in long-term use: increased risk of fracture. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2015) Proton pump inhibitors: very low risk of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2023) Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: reminder of the risk of disabling and potentially long-lasting or irreversible side effects. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. http://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NHS Digital (2022) Mortality from gastric, duodenal and peptic ulcers: crude death rate, by age group, 3-year average, MFP. NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2015) Quality standard [QS96]: Dyspepsia and gastro‑oesophageal reflux disease in adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2019) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • PHE (2019) Test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (HP) in dyspepsia. Quick reference guide for primary care: For consultation and local adaptation. Public Health England. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C.L. (2023) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.new.medicinescomplete.com
Change privacy settings