This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Gastrointestinal

Dyspepsia - proven GORD

Last revised in July 2023

The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms

Dyspepsia - proven GORD: Summary

  • The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms which are typically present for four or more weeks, including upper abdominal pain or discomfort, heartburn, acid reflux, nausea and/or vomiting.
  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is usually a chronic condition where there is reflux of gastric contents back into the oesophagus, causing predominant symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation.
  • 'Proven GORD' refers to endoscopically-determined reflux disease, which may be due to:
    • Oesophagitis, when oesophageal inflammation and mucosal erosions are seen.
    • Endoscopy-negative reflux disease (or non-erosive reflux disease), when a person has symptoms of GORD but endoscopy is normal.
  • Risk factors for developing GORD may include:
    • Lifestyle factors, such as obesity, trigger foods, smoking, alcohol, coffee, and stress.
    • Drugs that decrease the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, such as calcium-channel blockers, anticholinergics, theophylline, benzodiazepines, and nitrates.
    • Pregnancy.
  • The annual risk of recurrence of untreated GORD symptoms is 50%, and the lifetime risk of recurrence is 80%. GORD symptoms are more likely to relapse in people with severe oesophagitis.
    • 10–15% of people with GORD will develop Barrett's oesophagus, and 1–10% of these will develop oesophageal adenocarcinoma over the next 10–20 years.
  • Initial management of GORD symptoms should include:
    • Advice on lifestyle measures and sleeping with the head of the bed raised.
    • Reviewing and stopping any drugs that may be exacerbating symptoms, if possible and appropriate.
    • Offering a full-dose PPI for 4 weeks for proven GORD, to aid healing.
    • Offering a full-dose PPI for 8 weeks for proven severe oesophagitis, to aid healing.
  •  If there are refractory or recurrent symptoms, management should include:
    • Considering whether an alternative diagnosis such as cardiac or hepatobiliary disease is contributing to symptoms.
    • Checking the person's adherence to initial management.
    • Reinforcing lifestyle advice.
    • Prescribing a further 4 weeks of the initial PPI at full-dose or double-dose, or adding in a histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) at bedtime, for people with confirmed oesophagitis.
    • Switching to an H2RA for people with confirmed endoscopy-negative reflux disease.
    • Prescribing a high dose of the initial PPI for 8 weeks, or switching to an alternative full-dose or high-dose PPI for 8 weeks, if there is confirmed severe oesophagitis.
    • Offering a full-dose PPI long-term as maintenance treatment if symptoms of severe oesophagitis are controlled.
  • People on long-term treatment for GORD symptoms should be:
    • Offered an annual review.
    • Encouraged to step down or stop treatment, if possible and appropriate.
  • Referral to a gastroenterologist or upper gastrointestinal surgeon should be considered for people with GORD symptoms that are:
    • Refractory to treatment, persistent, or unexplained.
    • Controlled on acid suppression therapy, but the person does not want to continue treatment long-term or cannot tolerate treatment.
    • Associated with risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus.

Have I got the right topic?

From age 18 years onwards.

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management  [NICE, 2019].

This CKS topic covers the management of adults with endoscopically determined gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), which may be oesophagitis or endoscopy-negative reflux disease.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of symptoms of GORD where endoscopy has not been performed, or the management of Barrett's oesophagus.

There are separate CKS topics on Dyspepsia - pregnancy-associated, Dyspepsia - proven non-ulcer, Dyspepsia - proven peptic ulcer, Dyspepsia - unidentified cause, Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral, and GORD in children.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

July 2023 — minor update. Revised the potential post-operative mortality rate for Nissen fundoplication following publication of a systematic review and meta-analysis. A reference to the ACG clinical guideline: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease has been updated.

Previous changes

December 2022 — Minor update. Interstitial nephritis added as an adverse effect of lansoprazole, in line with the manufacturer's updated SPC.

October to November 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.

July 2022 — minor update. Severe cutaneous reactions have been added as a possible adverse effect of omeprazole in line with the updated Summary of Product Characteristics. 

September 2021 — minor update. Updated information regarding hypomagnesaemia as an adverse effect of PPIs.

February to April 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in February 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials since the last revision of this topic. The recommendations on primary care management and referral have been updated in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management (2014). The lower age limit has been changed from 16 to 18 years. The content has been amended to include proton pump inhibitor doses for treatment of severe oesophagitis, in line with the updated NICE guidance. The topic has also undergone minor restructuring.

December 2016 — minor update. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been added as a very infrequent adverse effect of proton pump inhibitors, in line with a Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Drug Safety Update (2015).

May 2014 — minor update. Domperidone has been removed as a treatment option following the publication of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) document Restrictions on the use of domperidone-containing medications.

September 2013 — minor update. Metoclopramide has been removed as a treatment option following the publication of a European Medicines Agency (EMA) document highlighting the risk of neurological adverse effects.

November 2012 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2012 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

October 2012 — minor update. The 2012 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic.

February 2012 — minor update. McNeil Products Ltd, in collaboration with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has published new safety data regarding the association of domperidone with an increased risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (2011). This topic has been updated to reflect their advice on dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. 

January 2012 — minor update. Information from the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPCs) about the possible interaction between pantoprazole and warfarin has been added to drug interactions (2011). Information from the British National Formulary (BNF) about the potentially serious interaction between proton pump inhibitors and protease inhibitors (atazanavir and saquinavir) has also been added (2011). 

June 2011 — minor update. The 2010/2011 QIPP options for local implementation have been added to this topic. 

March 2011 — the topic structure has been revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.

July 2009 — minor update. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued advice on the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. Healthcare professionals are advised to avoid concomitant use of these drugs unless considered essential. 

March to June 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.

November 2005 — minor technical update. 

July 2005 — updated to incorporate the Referral guidelines for suspected cancer published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 

December 2004 — reviewed and updated to incorporate the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on Dyspepsia (August 2004). Validated in March 2005 and issued in April 2005.

March 2004 — updated with additional information for nurse prescribers. 

July 2003 — updated to incorporate information from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline Dyspepsia (March 2003). Validated in September 2003 and issued in October 2003.

December 2000 — reviewed and updated to incorporate Guidance on the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of dyspepsia (Technology appraisal guidance 7), issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (July 2000), and the Department of Health referral guidelines for suspected upper gastrointestinal cancers. 

July 2000 — updated following the suspension of the cisapride licence and resultant withdrawal of cisapride from marketing in the UK. 

June 1998 — written.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines published since 1 October 2022.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTA's since 1 October 2022.

Economic appraisals

No new economic approvals since 1 October 2022.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Tasoudis et al, 2023 Transthoracic fundoplication using the Belsey Mark IV technique versus Nissen fundoplication: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Free full-text]

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 October 2022.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 October 2022.

New safety alert

No new safety alerts since 1 October 2022.

Changes in product availability

  • Omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg oral solution (Glenmark). This formulation is licensed for a range of indications for adult and paediatric patients, from age over 1 year of age and ≥ 10 kg. The product is single use, and requires assembly, before administration. Licence covers use in feeding tubes from 6 to 15Fr.  See more here.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Manage symptoms effectively in primary care.
  • Arrange follow up, when appropriate.
  • Arrange referral to secondary care, if appropriate.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

The following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards are relevant for this CKS topic:

  • Statement 1. Adults with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms who present to community pharmacists are given advice about making lifestyle changes, using over-the-counter medicines and when to consult their GP.
  • Statement 2. Adults presenting with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms are referred for urgent direct access endoscopy to take place within 2 weeks if they have dysphagia, or are aged 55 and over with weight loss.
  • Statement 4. Adults aged 55 and over with dyspepsia or reflux symptoms that have not responded to treatment have a discussion with their GP about referral for non-urgent direct access endoscopy.
  • Statement 5. Adults with persistent, unexplained dyspepsia or reflux symptoms have a discussion with their GP about referral to a specialist service.

[NICE, 2015]

Background information

What is gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD)?

  • The term 'dyspepsia' is used to describe a complex of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms which are typically present for four or more weeks, including upper abdominal pain or discomfort, heartburn, acid reflux, nausea and/or vomiting.
  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common cause of dyspepsia. It is usually a chronic condition where there is reflux of gastric contents (particularly acid, bile, and pepsin) back into the oesophagus, causing predominant symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation.
    • GORD may also be associated with atypical symptoms affecting the oropharynx and/or respiratory tract, such as hoarseness, cough, asthma, and dental erosions.
  • 'Proven GORD' refers to endoscopically-determined reflux disease, which may be due to:
    • Oesophagitis, when oesophageal inflammation and mucosal erosions are seen.
    • Endoscopy-negative reflux disease (or non-erosive reflux disease), when a person has symptoms of GORD but endoscopy is normal (seen in up to two-thirds of people).
  • GORD is thought to be caused by a combination of mechanisms, such as transient relaxation (reduced tone) of the lower oesophageal sphincter, increased intra-gastric pressure (for example straining and coughing), delayed gastric emptying, and impaired oesophageal clearance of acid.

[Bredenoord, 2013; Ford, 2013; WGO, 2015; NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]  . 

What are the risk factors?

  • Risk factors for developing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) may include:
    • Stress and anxiety.
    • Smoking and alcohol.
    • Trigger foods, such as coffee and chocolate, which may reduce lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone, and fatty foods which delay gastric emptying.
    • Obesity.
    • Drugs that decrease LOS pressure, such as alpha-blockers, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, beta-blockers, bisphosphonates, calcium-channel blockers, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), nitrates, theophyllines, and tricyclic antidepressants.
    • Pregnancy (hormonal changes can decrease LOS pressure).
    • Hiatus hernia (may lower LOS tone).
    • Family history (genetic factors are suggested by twin studies and familial clustering).
  • Risk factors for developing Barrett's oesophagus may include:
    • Male sex.
    • Long duration and/or increased frequency of GORD symptoms.
    • Previous oesophagitis or hiatus hernia.
    • Previous oesophageal stricture or ulcers.

[Ford, 2013; WGO, 2015; Bohmer, 2017; NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]

How common it is?

The exact prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is difficult to establish, as definitions vary between studies, and endoscopy is needed to make a formal diagnosis [NICE, 2019].

  • Overall, it is estimated that GORD affects between 10% and 30% of the adult population in developed countries [BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
  • The pooled prevalence of at least weekly GORD symptoms from worldwide population-based studies is approximately 13%, but with considerable geographic variation [Richter and Rubenstein, 2018].
  • A systematic review of the epidemiology of GORD found [El-Serag, 2014]:
    • Prevalence estimates to be 8.8–25.9% in Europe.
    • Higher prevalence rates in northern than southern Europe.
    • A UK and US incidence of approximately 5 per 1000 person-years.
  • The prevalence of GORD increases with age, and it is slightly more common in women overall [Becher, 2011; NICE, 2019].

What are the complications?

  • Complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) include:
    • Oesophageal ulcers.
    • Oesophageal haemorrhage.
    • Anaemia due to chronic blood loss (usually secondary to severe oesophagitis).
    • Oesophageal stricture (usually secondary to severe oesophagitis, where fibrosis leads to narrowing of the oesophageal lumen).
    • Aspiration pneumonia.
    • Barrett's oesophagus (columnar metaplasia of the distal oesophagus), which has malignant potential and an increased risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. This may affect 1% of people with long-segment disease (more than 3 cm of the distal oesophagus involved) each year.
    • Oral problems, such as dental erosions, gingivitis, and halitosis.

[Maret-Ouda, 2015; Bohmer, 2017; Richter and Rubenstein, 2018; NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022]

What is the prognosis?

  • The annual risk of recurrence of untreated GORD symptoms is 50%, and the lifetime recurrence risk is 80% [NICE, 2019].
  • 60–80% of people with successfully treated GORD symptoms will relapse within 1 year if not given maintenance therapy [NICE, 2019].
  • About 10% of people with endoscopy-negative reflux disease will develop severe oesophagitis over time [WGO, 2015].
  • 10–15% of people with GORD symptoms will develop Barrett's oesophagus, of these 1–10%  will develop oesophageal adenocarcinoma over the following 10–20 years [University of Michigan Health System, 2012].

Management

Scenario: Dyspepsia - proven GORD

From age 18 years onwards.

How should I initially manage a person with proven GORD?

  • Assess for any alarm symptoms that may suggest a complication or other serious underlying pathology, and manage appropriately. See the CKS topic on Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • Offer written information and advice on the symptoms, self-care, and management options for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), such as the NHS patient information leaflet Heartburn and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
  • Offer advice on lifestyle measures that may improve symptoms. Encourage the person to:
    • Lose weight if they are overweight or obese. See the CKS topic on Obesity for more information.
    • Avoid any trigger foods, such as coffee, chocolate, tomatoes, and fatty or spicy foods.
    • Eat smaller meals and eat their evening meal 3–4 hours before going to bed, if possible.
    • Stop smoking, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for more information.
    • Reduce alcohol consumption to recommended limits, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking for more information. 
  • Sleep with the head of the bed raised (for example by placing wood or bricks under the bed head to raise it by 10–20 cm, if practical).
    • Advise people not to use additional pillows, as this may increase intra-abdominal pressure and worsen symptoms.
  • Assess for stress and anxiety which may worsen symptoms, and encourage relaxation strategies if needed. See the CKS topic on Generalized anxiety disorder for more information.
  • Ask about any over-the-counter medication such as antacids and/or alginates that have been tried for symptom relief.
  • Review the person's medication, and consider reducing or stopping (if possible and appropriate) any drugs that may cause or exacerbate symptoms, such as:
    • Alpha-blockers, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, beta-blockers, bisphosphonates, calcium-channel blockers, corticosteroids, nitrates, theophyllines, and tricyclic antidepressants.
  • If the person has proven GORD:
  • If the person has proven severe oesophagitis:
  • Do not arrange testing for Helicobacter pylori infection.
  • Advise the person to arrange a follow-up appointment if there are refractory or recurrent symptoms following initial management.

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the initial management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) are largely based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], as well as the BMJ Best Practice guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [BMJ Best Practice, 2022], the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO) guideline Global Perspective on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [WGO, 2015], US Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [Katz, 2022], a Cochrane systematic review of short-term treatment of GORD symptoms and endoscopy-negative reflux disease [Sigterman, 2013], and review articles on GORD [Bredenoord, 2013; Anderson, 2015; Kang, 2015; Sandhu and Fass, 2018].

Alarm symptoms
  • The recommendation on assessing for alarm symptoms and managing appropriately is based on expert opinion in the NICE guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021].
Lifestyle modification
  • The full NICE guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management states that there is limited or inconclusive evidence from small trials on the benefits of lifestyle modification to reduce GORD symptoms, however expert opinion from the Guideline Development Group recommended these measures as they encourage self-management of GORD and may have more general health benefits [NICE, 2019].
    • Obesity, smoking, and certain trigger foods such as coffee, chocolate, and alcohol may transiently reduce the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone, and fatty foods delay gastric emptying; however, any effect is likely to be small. Smoking increases gastric acid production and delays gastric emptying [Sandhu and Fass, 2018; NICE, 2019].
    • A systematic review of the effect of lifestyle measures on GORD symptoms found limited evidence for avoiding alcohol, caffeine, chocolate, and fatty and spicy foods. However, it found good evidence that weight reduction and smoking cessation are beneficial [Kang, 2015].
    • There is limited evidence from small studies that raising the bed head decreases distal oesophageal acid exposure, and this may be particularly helpful in people who have nocturnal symptoms. Lying flat may increase reflux episodes as gravity is not preventing acid regurgitation [Kang, 2015; Sandhu and Fass, 2018; NICE, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
Managing stress and anxiety
  • The recommendation on assessing for, and managing, associated stress and anxiety is extrapolated from the NICE recommendation to offer psychological treatments to people with functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia, as this may reduce symptoms in the short-term [NICE, 2019]. This is also supported by expert opinion in a review article on dyspepsia [Ford, 2013].
Medication review
  • The recommendation on considering reducing or stopping a variety of drugs that may reduce LOS pressure and cause or exacerbate GORD symptoms is based on expert opinion in the NICE guideline, and is also supported by information within the WGO and BMJ Best Practice guidelines [NICE, 2019; WGO, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2022].
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy
  • The full NICE guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management recommends a full-dose PPI for one month as first-line treatment for endoscopically-proven oesophagitis and endoscopy-negative reflux disease, based on evidence from systematic reviews which showed that [NICE, 2019]:
    • PPIs are significantly more effective than placebo or histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) at healing oesophagitis.
    • PPIs appear more effective than H2RAs at improving symptoms of endoscopy-negative reflux disease.
  • NICE also found very low-quality evidence from a network meta-analysis that PPIs were superior to H2RAs and placebo in endoscopic healing of severe oesophagitis [NICE, 2019].
    • It was not possible to determine which was the best PPI or dose, as it found no evidence that any PPI was more effective than another when compared at equivalent doses.
  • This is supported by a Cochrane systematic review of evidence from 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of short-term treatment of people with GORD symptoms (not confirmed on endoscopy) or with known endoscopy-negative reflux disease (total n = 1314). In a direct comparison, PPIs were more effective than H2RAs and prokinetics [Sigterman, 2013].
  • A NICE cost-utility analysis model found that 8 weeks of PPI treatment is more cost-effective than a 4-week regimen for healing of acute severe oesophagitis, regardless of the drug and dose used [NICE, 2019].
Not investigating for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection
  • The NICE clinical guideline found no evidence for H. pylori investigation in people with GORD [NICE, 2019], and the WGO guideline states that H. pylori status has no effect on symptom severity, recurrence, or treatment efficacy in most people with GORD symptoms [WGO, 2015]. This is supported by expert opinion in a review articles on GORD [Bredenoord, 2013; Anderson, 2015].
Follow-up for refractory or recurrent symptoms
  • This recommendation is based on the NICE clinical guideline, as up to 80% of people successfully treated for GORD symptoms will experience a relapse within 1 year [NICE, 2019]. It is also pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.

How should I manage refractory or recurrent GORD symptoms?

  • Assess for any new alarm symptoms that may suggest a complication or other serious underlying pathology, and manage appropriately. See the CKS topic on Gastrointestinal tract (upper) cancers - recognition and referral for more information.
  • For people with persistent or recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms despite initial management:
  • For people with persistent or recurrent symptoms and confirmed oesophagitis, consider one of the following options, depending on clinical judgement:
    • Prescribe a further course of the initial full-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 1 month. See the section on Proton pump inhibitors in Prescribing information for more information.
    • Prescribe a double dose of the initial PPI for 1 month.
    • Add in a histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) at bedtime, particularly if there are nocturnal symptoms. Prescribe an H2RA for short-term use (for example for a 2-week course intermittently). See the section on H2-receptor antagonists in Prescribing information for more information.
  • For people with persistent or recurrent symptoms and endoscopy-negative reflux disease, consider switching to an H2RA, for one month.
  • For people with recurrent symptoms after initial management, consider the need for long-term treatment. Encourage the person to step down or stop treatment, if possible and appropriate (if there is no co-morbidity or co-medication that requires long-term PPI treatment):
    • Use a PPI at the lowest effective dose to control symptoms.
    • Use a PPI as needed, if possible and appropriate.
    • Consider self-treatment with antacid and/or alginate therapy, although this is not recommended for long-term or continuous use.
  • If a person with severe oesophagitis has ongoing symptoms following initial management, consider one of the following options for 8 weeks, depending on clinical judgement:
  • If a person with severe oesophagitis has controlled symptoms, offer a full-dose PPI long-term as maintenance treatment. If there are ongoing or recurrent symptoms on treatment, consider whether to:
    • Switch to an alternative full-dose or high-dose PPI, and/or
    • Seek specialist advice from a gastroenterologist.
  • Offer people on long-term treatment an annual review of their symptoms and treatment, and encourage the person to:
    • Step down or stop treatment, if possible and appropriate, if there is no co-morbidity or co-medication that requires long-term full-dose PPI therapy, such as:
  • Consider arranging a referral to a gastroenterologist or upper gastrointestinal surgeon for specialist investigations and management, if a person has proven GORD symptoms:
    • That are refractory to treatment, persistent, or unexplained.
    • That are controlled on acid suppression therapy, but the person does not wish to continue treatment long-term.
    • That are responding to a PPI, but acid suppression therapy is not tolerated.
    • In association with risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus, for consideration of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Specialist investigations and management

Specialist investigations
  • Oesophageal manometry — may help to exclude oesophageal motility disorders such as achalasia and severe oesophageal hypomotility (such as scleroderma-like oesophagus). Should also be undertaken if anti-reflux surgery is being considered.
  • Ambulatory 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring  — to quantify reflux and assess the relationship between reflux episodes and the person's symptoms.
  • Barium swallow or meal — to help exclude structural disorders (such as hiatus hernia) or motility disorders (such as achalasia).
Specialist management
  • Laparoscopic fundoplication — the gold standard for anti-reflux surgery, and involves mobilization of the fundus of the stomach which is then wrapped around the lower oesophagus.
    • Surgery is associated with a small risk of mortality and with complications such as gas-bloat syndrome, post-operative dysphagia, strictures, or recurrence of reflux symptoms.
  • Other procedures that may be undertaken in specialist centres include:
    • Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation.
    • Laparoscopic insertion of a magnetic bead band.
    • Endoscopic injection of bulking agents.

 [WGO, 2015; NICE, 2019; Katz, 2022; BMJ Best Practice, 2022; Tasoudis 2023]

Basis for recommendation

The recommendations on the management of refratory or recurrent symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) are largely based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO) guideline Global perspective on gastroesophageal reflux disease [WGO, 2015], US Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [Katz, 2022], and are supported by the information within review articles on GORD [Bredenoord, 2013; Anderson, 2015; Sandhu and Fass, 2018].

Alarm symptoms
  • The recommendation on assessing for any new alarm symptoms and managing appropriately is based on the NICE guideline Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NICE, 2021].
Management of ongoing symptoms
  • The recommendations on management options for people with ongoing symptoms are based on variable-quality evidence cited by NICE regarding people with oesophagitis detected at endoscopy, who do not respond to initial treatment with 1 month of full-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Studies varied in sample size and defined population, and often had short-term follow-up of endoscopic-only outcomes [NICE, 2019]:
    • There may be additional benefit in increasing the duration of initial PPI therapy from 4 to 8 weeks.
    • Doubling the dose of PPI may have a small effect in healing oesophagitis after 4 weeks.
    • There was no evidence that any PPI was more effective than another when compared at equivalent doses, and it is assumed that PPIs have a 'class effect'.
    • Adding a histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist (H2RA) at bedtime may improve symptoms in people who have nocturnal acid breakthrough in the short-term, however tachyphylaxis (rebound symptoms) may occur after 1 week, and ongoing H2RA therapy is likely to become increasingly ineffective.
      • This is supported by expert opinion in a review article on GORD which states that the effect of additional suppression of nocturnal acid secretion may wear off within a few weeks [Bredenoord, 2013].
      • The recommendation to consider prescribing intermittent 2-week courses of an H2RA is based on the expert opinion of previous external reviewers of this CKS topic.
  • The recommendations on management options for people with endoscopy-negative reflux disease who have not responded to PPI therapy are based on the NICE clinical guideline, which states that individual people may respond to an H2RA, which is more effective than antacid therapy. NICE cites a systematic review comparing PPIs, H2RAs, and prokinetics in people with endoscopy-negative reflux disease, which found that [NICE, 2019]:
    • PPIs were effective at preventing relapse of GORD symptoms when compared with placebo in 5 trials (n = 1167).
    • H2RAs were effective at preventing relapse of GORD symptoms when compared with placebo in 2 trials (n = 514).
    • Two head-to-head trials of PPI and H2RA therapy found a non-significant trend favouring PPI therapy (n = 776).
  • The recommendations on management options for people with severe oesophagitis with ongoing symptoms are based on the NICE guideline development group's clinical experience and expertise [NICE, 2019].
Stepping down or stopping treatment
  • The recommendation that PPIs should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration to reduce the risk of adverse effects associated with long-term PPI use is based on the NICE guideline [NICE, 2019] and expert opinion in a review article on GORD [Anderson, 2015].
    • The NICE guideline cites good-quality evidence that intermittent PPI therapy is superior to placebo at controlling GORD symptoms, and recommends PPIs should be used as needed if possible, as a cost-effective option to promote patient self-management of their condition.
    • NICE found limited evidence to suggest that that antacid and/or alginate therapy is no more effective at healing oesophagitis than placebo, however it was noted that it is often prescribed by primary healthcare professionals, or used as over-the-counter medication. It may provide short-term symptom relief, but does not prevent GORD symptoms.
Maintenance therapy for severe oesophagitis
  • The recommendation on the need for long-term PPI treatment for people with severe oesophagitis to prevent relapse is based on recommendations within the the NICE guideline [NICE, 2019].
    • NICE found variable-quality evidence which contributed to a very low-quality network meta-analysis that found full-dose PPIs were more effective than low-dose PPIs, H2RAs, and placebo in preventing relapse for people with endoscopy-confirmed severe oesophagitis. The studies varied in sample size and defined population, and often had short-term follow-up of endoscopic-only outcomes. The meta-analysis was unable to determine which was the most cost-effective PPI to use and at what dose.
Specialist referral
  • The recommendations on referral are based on the NICE guideline development group's clinical experience and expertise [NICE, 2019], and are supported by expert opinion in the WGO guideline [WGO, 2015] and US guideline [Katz, 2022].
  • The recommendation on considering referral if the person has risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus is based on evidence cited by NICE: 32 low-quality studies which identified a sub-group of people with GORD symptoms who may benefit from having an endoscopy to allow early identification of Barrett's oesophagus. These people may be at higher risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and surveillance endoscopy may be indicated for people at higher risk of disease progression.
Surgical outcomes
  • The post-operative mortality rate for Nissen fundoplication reported in many small studies is close to zero. A systematic review and meta-analysis quotes in-hospital mortality rates between 0.08-0.3% [Tasoudis 2023]. 

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Proton pump inhibitors

Choice of proton pump inhibitor

  • Table 1 shows the recommended doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and severe oesophagitis.

Table 1. PPI doses for management of GORD and severe oesophagitis symptoms.

PPI

Full or standard dose

Low dose (on-demand dose)

Double dose

Omeprazole20 mg once a day (40 mg once a day if severe oesophagitis)* 10 mg once a day (20 mg once a day if severe oesophagitis)40 mg once a day (40 mg twice a day if severe oesophagitis)
Lansoprazole30 mg once a day15 mg once a day* 30 mg twice a day
Pantoprazole40 mg once a day20 mg once a day* 40 mg twice a day
Rabeprazole20 mg once a day10 mg once a day* 20 mg twice a day
Esomeprazole† 20 mg once a day (40 mg once a day if severe oesophagitis)Not available (20 mg once a day if severe oesophagitis)‡ 40 mg once a day (40 mg twice a day if severe oesophagitis)
Doses in brackets are specifically for use in severe oesophagitis.
Doses should be given 30 minutes before breakfast and (if needed) 30 minutes before the evening meal, to provide optimal control of gastric pH.
* Off-label dose for GORD.
† This is lower than the licensed starting dose in GORD, but is considered to be dose-equivalent to other PPIs.
‡ This dose is recommended for double dose, because the 20 mg dose of esomeprazole is considered to be equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg.
Data from: [NICE, 2019]

Contraindications and cautions

  • Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) should not be prescribed to people:
    • With alarm symptoms before endoscopy, as PPIs may mask the symptoms of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. If the person is already taking a PPI and subsequently needs an endoscopy, the PPI should be stopped at least 2 weeks before the procedure.
  • PPIs should be prescribed with caution to people:
    • At risk of osteoporosis — the person should maintain an adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, and if necessary, be given additional bone-sparing therapy.
    • At risk of hypomagnesaemia — if possible, magnesium levels should be checked before starting PPI therapy and intermittently during long-term treatment, for example if the person is prescribed drugs that can cause hypomagnesaemia, such as digoxin and diuretics.

[MHRA, 2012a; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are usually mild and reversible.

  • Adverse effects include headache, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and dizziness.
  • Less common adverse effects include dry mouth, peripheral oedema, sleep disturbance, fatigue, paraesthesia, arthralgia, myalgia, pruritus, and rash.
  • Rare or very rare adverse effects include:
    • Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), which can occur weeks, months, or years after exposure to a PPI. If suspected discontinue the PPI and seek specialist advice if needed [MHRA, 2015].
    • Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported very rarely and rarely with omeprazole treatment.
    • Taste disturbance, hepatitis, jaundice, depression, confusion, hallucinations, hyponatraemia, interstitial nephritis, leucopenia, leucocytosis, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia, visual disturbances, sweating, photophobia, and alopecia.
  • Long-term PPI treatment may be associated with uncommon, serious adverse effects such as:
    • Hypomagnesaemia — symptoms include muscle twitching, tremors, vomiting, fatigue, and loss of appetite. Case reports after one year of PPI therapy, but may occur after 3 months. This usually improves after magnesium replacement therapy and discontinuation of the PPI [MHRA, 2012a]. Hypomagnesaemia may lead to hypocalcaemia and/or hypokalaemia.
    • Increased risk of fractures — especially when used at high doses for over a year in the elderly [MHRA, 2012b].
    • Clostridium difficile infection — due to the effect of decreasing gastric acidity.
    • Rebound acid hypersecretion syndrome — may occur after stopping long-term PPI therapy, although this may be more a theoretical risk than clinical phenomenon.

[NICE, 2019; BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

Possible drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) include:

  • Citalopram and escitalopram — co-exposure to omeprazole or esomeprazole can lead to increased levels of citalopram and escitalopram. Dose adjustment may be necessary depending on side-effects.
  • Digoxin — PPIs may cause a small rise in serum digoxin levels (although not considered clinically significant). The manufacturer of lansoprazole suggests that digoxin levels should be monitored if lansoprazole is started or stopped.
  • Warfarin — PPIs can occasionally enhance the effects of warfarin. The international normalized ratio (INR) should be monitored in people taking warfarin if omeprazole, pantoprazole, or esomeprazole is started or stopped.
  • Methotrexate — PPIs possibly reduce excretion of methotrexate, leading to an increased risk of methotrexate toxicity.
  • Phenytoin — omeprazole and esomeprazole can occasionally enhance the effects of phenytoin. The manufacturers recommend that people taking phenytoin are carefully monitored if omeprazole or esomeprazole is started or stopped.
  • Azole antifungals — the absorption of ketoconazole or itraconazole may be reduced during PPI treatment. Dose adjustment of the antifungal drug may be required during long-term PPI treatment.
  • Clopidogrel — omeprazole and esomeprazole reduce the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, and concomitant use should be avoided. The other PPIs may also reduce the efficacy of clopidogrel, and this risk should be weighed against the potential benefit of the PPI [MHRA, (2010)].
  • Protease inhibitors — PPIs can significantly affect plasma levels of some protease inhibitor drugs, including:
    • Atazanavir — concurrent use of PPIs and atazanavir is not recommended as the absorption of atazanavir may be affected by a PPI (due to changes in gastric acidity). This may lead to a reduced plasma concentration of atazanavir which may affect its efficacy. If concurrent use is necessary, seek specialist advice.
    • Saquinavir — plasma concentration of saquinavir may be increased by PPI treatment, leading to increased risk of adverse effects.
    • Tipranavir — concurrent use with omeprazole or esomeprazole is not recommended, as tipranavir may reduce the plasma concentration of the PPI. If concurrent use is necessary, seek specialist advice.

 [ABPI, 2021; BNF, 2022; Preston, 2023]

H2-receptor antagonists

Choice of H2-receptor antagonist

  • Table 1 shows the recommended doses of ranitidine, famotidine, and nizatidine histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for the management of people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

Table 1. Recommended doses of H2RAs for the management of people with GORD.

H2RA

Usual treatment dose

Nocturnal dose

Ranitidine*150 mg twice a day300 mg once a day
Famotidine20–40 mg twice a day—
Nizatidine150–300 mg twice a day—
Note: cimetidine is also licensed for the treatment of GORD, however it is not recommended as there is a higher risk of drug interactions, due to inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes. * Ranitidine not currently available in UK or globally.
Data from: [BNF, 2022]

 

Contraindications and cautions

  • Histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) should not be prescribed to people:
    • With alarm symptoms before endoscopy, as H2RAs may mask the symptoms of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. If the person is already taking an H2RA and subsequently needs an endoscopy, the H2RA should be stopped at least 2 weeks before the procedure.
  • H2RAs should be prescribed with caution in people with renal impairment:
    • For ranitidine, if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is less than 50 mL/minute/1.73m2, prescribe half the normal daily dose.
    • For famotidine, if the eGFR is less than 50 mL/minute/1.73m2, prescribe the normal dose once every 36–48 hours, or half the normal daily dose.
    • For nizatidine, if the eGFR is 20–50 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe half the normal daily dose; if the eGFR is less than 20 mL/minute/1.73 m2, prescribe one-quarter of the normal daily dose.
  • Nizatidine should be prescribed with caution for people with hepatic impairment.

[NICE, 2019; BNF, 2022]

Adverse effects

  • Adverse effects of histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are uncommon and include diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, rash, and tiredness.
  • Rare or very rare adverse effects include hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice, bradycardia, depression, confusion, hallucinations, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia, arthralgia, and myalgia.

[BNF, 2022]

Drug interactions

  • Possible drug interactions with histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) include:
    • Azole antifungals — because of decreased gastric acidity, the absorption of ketoconazole or itraconazole may be reduced if taken with an H2RA.
    • Protease inhibitors — atazanavir plasma levels are reduced by H2RAs. The manufacturer of atazanavir advises adjustment of the doses of both drugs when given with an H2RA. Seek specialist advice as needed.

[BNF, 2022]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management [NICE, 2019], the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO) guideline Global perspective on gastroesophageal reflux disease [WGO, 2015], US Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease [Katz, 2022], and expert opinion in review articles. The rationale for the individual recommendations is discussed in the basis for recommendation sections. CKS has not summarized the evidence for secondary care investigations and management as they are beyond the scope of this topic.

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of Dyspepsia - proven GORD.

Search dates

January 2017 - October 2022

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp Dyspepsia, (dyspepsia or dyspeptic).tw. or heartburn/ or heartburn.tw. or indigestion.tw. or gastroesophageal reflux.tw. or gerd.tw. or gord.tw. exp Heartburn/, heartburn or indigestion or gastroesophageal adj reflux or GERD or gord or acid adj reflux).tw.
  • gastroesophageal reflux/ or gerd.tw. or gord.tw. or gastric acid/ or gastroesophageal reflux.tw or gastrooesophageal reflux.tw. or gastro-esophageal reflux.tw. or gastro-oesophageal reflux.tw.

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2021) SPC for Citalopram 10mg Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • Anderson, W.D., Strayer, S.M. and Mull, S.R. (2015) Common questions about the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. American Academy of Family Physicians 91(10), 692-697.
  • Becher, A. and Dent, J. (2011) Systematic review: ageing and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, oesophageal function and reflux oesophagitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 33(4), 442-454. [Abstract]
  • BMJ Best Practice (2022) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. BMJ Publishing Group. http://bestpractice.bmj.com
  • BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Bohmer, A.C. and Schumacher, J. (2017) Insights into the genetics of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and GERD-related disorders. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 29, 13017-13022.
  • Bredenoord, A.J., Pandolfino, J.E. and Smout, A.J.P.M. (2013) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 381(9881), 1933-1942. [Abstract]
  • El-Serag, H.B., Sweet, S. and Winchester, C.C. et al (2014) Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 63(6), 871-880. [Abstract]
  • Ford, A.C. and Moayyedi, P. (2013) Dyspepsia. British Medical Journal 347, 1-5. [Abstract]
  • Kang, J.H.-E. and Kang, J.Y. (2015) Lifestyle measures in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: clinical and pathophysiological considerations. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. 6(2), 51-64.
  • Katz, P.O., Dunbar, K.B., Schnoll-Sussman, F.H. et al. (2022) ACG clinical guideline: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. American Journal of Gastroenterology 117(1), 27-56. [Abstract]
  • Maret-Ouda, J., Brusselaers, N. and Lagergren, J. (2015) What is the most effective treatment for severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease? British Medical Journal 350, 1-3. [Abstract]
  • MHRA (2010) Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors: interaction - updated advice. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2012a) Proton pump inhibitors in long term use: reports of hypomagnesaemia. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2012b) Proton pump inhibitors in long-term use: increased risk of fracture. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • MHRA (2015) Proton pump inhibitors: very low risk of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2015) Quality standard [QS96]: Dyspepsia and gastro‑oesophageal reflux disease in adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2019) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • NICE (2021) Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Preston, C.L. (2023) Stockley's Drug Interactions. Medicines Complete. Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.new.medicinescomplete.com
  • Richter, J.E. and Rubenstein, J.H. (2018) Presentation and Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 154(2), 267-276. [Abstract]
  • Sandhu, D.S. and Fass, R. (2018) Current Trends in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gut Liver. 12(1), 7-16. [Abstract]
  • Sigterman, K.E., van Pinxteren, B., Bonis, P.A., et al. (2013) Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Tasoudis, P., Vitkos, E., Haithcock, B.E. and Long, J.M. (2023) Transthoracic fundoplication using the Belsey Mark IV technique versus Nissen fundoplication: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 37(6), 4123-4130. [Abstract]
  • University of Michigan Health System (2012) Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). University of Michigan Health System.. ocpd.med.umich.edu [Free Full-text]
  • WGO (2015) Global perspective on gastroesophageal reflux disease. World Gastroenterology Organisation. http://www.worldgastroenterology.org [Free Full-text]
Change privacy settings