Drugs and devices Musculoskeletal
DMARDs
March 2026
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are a class of drugs, which are designed to influence the course of a disease
DMARDs: Summary
- Disease‑modifying anti‑rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medicines that alter disease progression.
- DMARDs are used mainly for rheumatoid arthritis, either alone or in combination. Other adult indications include ankylosing spondylitis, connective tissue diseases, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, vasculitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.
- DMARDs are classified as:
- Conventional synthetic (such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine).
- Biologic (such as adalimumab, infliximab).
- Targeted synthetic (such as apremilast, tofacitinib).
- Regular monitoring is required for people taking DMARDs, due to risks such as myelosuppression; gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, or pulmonary toxicity; and increased susceptibility to infection.
- DMARDs should be started and initially monitored by a specialist. Once stable, GPs may continue prescribing and monitoring under shared‑care arrangements. Requirements vary by drug and local protocol.
- Periodic measurement of parameters such as full blood count (FBC), electrolytes, renal and liver function, and serum albumin is included in DMARD monitoring.
- Monitoring frequency is largely based on the person's risk of DMARD toxicity.
- Monitoring results should be assessed both as isolated values and in relation to longitudinal trends.
- Rapid deterioration or a consistent directional change may indicate emerging toxicity and should prompt heightened clinical vigilance.
- Laboratory abnormalities that may necessitate specialist input include results falling outside established safety thresholds, progressive declines in blood counts or renal function, rising liver enzymes, or any pattern suggestive of drug‑related adverse effects.
- For people on any DMARD, treatment should be paused and urgent rheumatology advice sought if they develop signs and symptoms suggesting myelosuppression, drug toxicity, or another serious adverse effect. Clinical features include:
- Rash, pruritus, or mouth/throat ulcers.
- Sore throat.
- Fever.
- Unexplained bruising or bleeding.
- Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, or weight loss.
- Diffuse alopecia.
- Breathlessness, cough, or infection.
- Peripheral neuropathy.
- For people on biologic DMARDs, treatment should be paused and urgent specialist advice sought if they develop:
- Cough, haemoptysis, or weight loss (possible tuberculosis).
- New or worsening heart failure (particularly with a TNF-inhibitor).
- Shortness of breath or dry cough (possible interstitial lung disease).
- Skin rashes.
- Severe abdominal pain or unexplained bowel changes with fever.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 18 years onwards.
This CKS topic covers the ongoing monitoring of adults on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in primary care.
This CKS topic does not cover the monitoring of DMARDs in children and young people.
This CKS topic does not provide information on pre-treatment testing as this is performed in secondary care, or the clinical management of conditions caused by or treated with DMARDs. It also does not cover pharmacological actions of individual DMARDs, drug interactions, or other medications that need to be given concurrently.
There are separate CKS topics on Ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, Psoriasis, Rheumatoid arthritis, and Ulcerative colitis.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
March 2026 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2026 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has been aligned with the 2025 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.
Previous changes
December 2023 — minor update. Recommendations relating to COVID-19 infection have been removed from this topic.
December 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. The following changes have been made to the topic: The indications for the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been removed and links to the British National Formulary (BNF) and the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) provided. Sections on Definition and Adverse effects have been added to Background information. Scenario: Gold - intramuscular has been removed from the topic as sodium aurothiomalate was discontinued in June 2019 due to a shortage of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient.
September 2021 — minor update. Erythema nodosum has been added as a potential adverse effect.
May 2021 — minor update. A single pneumococcal vaccine is now recommended unless the person on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) also has asplenic, splenic dysfunction, or chronic renal disease.
April 2020 — minor update. A new management scenario has been created to provide information on COVID-19.
July 2018 — minor update. The recommendation to carry out baseline formal ophthalmic examination within 1 year of commencing an antimalarial drug has been added to the section on hydroxychloroquine monitoring.
September to October 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic.
July 2015 — minor update. Information on measurement of ionised calcium levels has been added to the section on leflunomide monitoring as per updates to the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).
July 2015 — minor update. The recommendation on pneumococcal vaccine has been amended to be in line with regional guidelines on the monitoring of people on DMARDs.
August 2014 — minor update to recommend seeking medical advice if signs or symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis appear during or after treatment with a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, based on advice in manufacturers' SPCs.
April 2014 — minor updates. Text to sulfasalazine monitoring requirements amended in line with updated information in the SPC for sulfasalazine tablets. Advice from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regarding TNF inhibitors and the need to screen and monitor for tuberculosis has been incorporated.
June 2013 — update to the text to reflect guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
January 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in December 2012 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of the topic. Three new sections have been included: General principles of management, Scenario: Cyclophosphamide, and Scenario: Mycophenolate mofetil. Minor changes have been made to the recommendations for monitoring biologic DMARDs.
January 2013 — minor update. An error was found in the text regarding the monitoring requirements for methotrexate. This error has been corrected.
July 2009 — minor update. Periodic skin monitoring for non-melanoma skin cancers in people with psoriasis taking TNF inhibitors has been added to this topic. Issued in July 2009.
May to August 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.
April 2005 — written (extracted from the CKS topic on rheumatoid arthritis). Validated in June 2005 and issued in July 2005.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 March 2026.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTA's since 1 March 2026.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 March 2026.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews and meta-analyses since 1 March 2026.
Primary evidence
No new controlled trials published in the major journals since 1 March 2026.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 March 2026.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 March 2026.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 March 2026.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Provide appropriate ongoing monitoring of adults taking disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
- Take appropriate action if test results are abnormal.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.
Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.Background information
What are disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)?
- Disease‑modifying anti‑rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medicines that alter the course of disease. Regular monitoring is required due to the risk of adverse effects, such as myelosuppression; gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, and pulmonary toxicity; and increased susceptibility to infection.
- DMARDs are used most widely for rheumatoid arthritis, either alone or in combination. Other adult indications include:
- Ankylosing spondylitis.
- Connective tissue diseases (systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syndrome).
- Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
- Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
- Vasculitic disorders.
- Uveitis.
- Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis).
- Certain cancers.
- Prevention of organ transplant rejection.
- Licensed and unlicensed indications can be found in the manufacturers’ Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs), on the electronic Medicines Compendium (www.medicines.org.uk), and the British National Formulary (BNF).
- DMARDs are classified as conventional synthetic, biologic, and targeted synthetic agents. Each has a distinct mechanism of action that interferes with key inflammatory pathways.
- Conventional DMARDs have broad immunosuppressive effects. Common examples include methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine. They are taken orally or by injection.
- Biologic DMARDs are genetically engineered proteins that inhibit specific immune components. They are administered by self‑injection or infusion and include:
- TNF inhibitors: adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab.
- B‑cell inhibitors: belimumab, rituximab.
- Interleukin (IL) inhibitors: anakinra (IL-1); tocilizumab, sarilumab (IL-6); brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab (IL-17); ustekinumab (IL‑12/23); guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab (IL‑23).
- T‑cell inhibitors: abatacept.
- Targeted synthetic DMARDs also act on specific immune pathways. These are taken orally and include:
- Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors: abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib.
- Phosphodiesterase‑4 inhibitors: apremilast.
- Unlike conventional DMARDs, which may take a month or longer to show benefit, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs typically act more quickly, often within 2–6 weeks, depending on the drug.
[NICE, 2020; BSR, 2022; BAD, 2023; Arthritis Foundation, 2025; EMC, 2025a; BNF, 2026]
What are the possible adverse effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)?
- Adverse effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include:
- Myelosuppression (bone marrow suppression).
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects (such as nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhoea).
- Renal toxicity.
- Hepatic toxicity.
- Pulmonary toxicity.
- Rash/allergic reaction.
- Hair loss.
- Neuropathy.
- Damage to the retina (hydroxychloroquine).
- Infections (vaccinations should be offered to prevent serious infections).
- Reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (particularly TNF inhibitors).
- Heart failure (TNF inhibitors).
- Venous thromboembolism (JAK inhibitors).
- Increased risk of malignancy.
- For a list of adverse effects of DMARDs, see the manufacturers' Summaries of Product Characteristics (available on the eMC website) and the British National Formulary (BNF).
Management
Scenario: General principles of managing adults on DMARDs
From age 18 years onwards.
What are the general principles of managing adults on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)?
- Disease‑modifying anti‑rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) should be initiated and initially monitored by a specialist in secondary care. Once treatment is stable, GPs may continue prescribing and monitoring under a shared‑care protocol.
- Prescribing and monitoring requirements vary between DMARDs. Local guidelines may also differ.
- Most conventional DMARDs can be prescribed and monitored in primary care under shared care, with secondary‑care review as needed.
- People on biologic DMARDs require regular secondary‑care review. Monitoring blood tests may be done at these appointments. If primary‑care monitoring is required, it should be detailed in a shared-care arrangement.
- When prescribing and monitoring a DMARD, always follow recommendations in the shared-care arrangement and/or local guidelines where they differ from those in this CKS topic.
- When monitoring, consider that:
- Absolute values are important, but trends also matter. Rapid or consistent changes in any parameter (e.g., falling white cells or albumin, rising liver enzymes) require increased vigilance.
- DMARDs are commonly used in combination. Monitoring should follow the schedule of the drug requiring the most frequent checks.
- Monitor for adverse effects or complications of treatment.
- Ensure the person understands potential side effects and knows who to contact if they occur.
- Liaise with the person's consultant regarding any adverse effects or complications. See the section on when to seek specialist advice for more information.
- Be aware that major toxicity with DMARDs can occur during intercurrent illness, particularly if there is impairment of renal function or sepsis.
- Seek specialist advice, as treatment may need to be paused.
- People on DMARDs are more prone to infection, particularly in the first 6 months.
- Offer vaccinations to reduce infection risk, including:
- Annual influenza vaccine, and COVID‑19 vaccination according to national guidance — consider withholding methotrexate for up to two weeks following influenza or COVID-19 vaccination depending on the person's risk of disease flare. See the CKS topic on Coronavirus - COVID-19 and Immunizations - seasonal influenza for general information on these vaccinations.
- Pneumococcal vaccine (preferably before starting treatment). See Scenario: Children aged over 10 years, and adults diagnosed at clinical risk in the CKS topic on Immunizations - pneumococcal for more information.
- Live vaccines should generally be avoided in people on DMARDs due to the increased risk of generalized infection (possibly life-threatening). Always seek specialist advice if a live vaccine is being considered.
- Advise the person to avoid contact with shingles or chickenpox and to seek urgent advice if exposed.
- Consider vaccination against chickenpox prior to starting a DMARD if the person is non-immune.
- Offer vaccination against shingles to all people taking a DMARD.
- Offer vaccinations to reduce infection risk, including:
- Be aware of potential drug interactions with DMARDs. Refer to the manufacturers' Summaries of Product Characteristics (available on the eMC website) and the British National Formulary (BNF) for details.
- Ensure people on DMARDs receive appropriate patient information leaflets, such as those from Arthritis UK and National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs [Tran, 2019], the Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust DMARDs Shared care prescribing guidelines [Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 2024], the Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System Shared Care Guidelines for the use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) [Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System, 2026] , the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026], the UKHSA Immunisation against infectious disease (Green Book) Chapter on Shingles [UKHSA, 2025], and what CKS considers good clinical practice.
Shared care
- DMARDs are prescribed and monitored in primary care according to individualised shared-care arrangements provided by the specialist(s) who initiated and initially managed the person's treatment. Local guidelines may also exist. Although this CKS topic provides general advice regarding DMARD monitoring based on guidance from the BSR [BSR, 2026], readers should be aware of the importance of adhering to perosnalised specialist recommendations and local protocols.
Vaccinations
- The advice to consider withholding methotrexate for two weeks following influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations is based on the BSR guideline, which cites evidence from several randomized controlled trials assessing whether temporarily stopping methotrexate improves the immune response to vaccines [BSR, 2026].
- For influenza vaccination, three trials involving a total of 693 participants assessed different interruption strategies, including pausing treatment before vaccination and withholding it for up to four weeks afterwards.
- A short, two‑week interruption after vaccination was found to enhance immunogenicity while maintaining an acceptable safety profile, with fewer disease flares than a four‑week interruption.
- The evidence indicated that stopping methotrexate before vaccination is not required to improve vaccine response.
- For COVID‑19 vaccination, trials involved a collective total of 639 participants with immune‑mediated inflammatory disease. These studies assessed a two‑week pause after the primary vaccine series and after subsequent booster doses.
- The findings were consistent with those from the influenza studies.
- Four weeks after receiving a booster dose, individuals who withheld methotrexate for two weeks demonstrated significantly higher antibody levels than those who continued treatment.
- This enhanced response persisted for up to 26 weeks and was observed across different ages, disease types, and methotrexate doses.
- Any decision to interrupt methotrexate must balance the potential immunological benefit against the risk of disease flare. In the COVID‑19 vaccination trials, a greater number of flares occurred over the 12‑week follow‑up period in the groups that paused methotrexate.
- The information on shingles vaccination for people who are immunosuppressed derives from The Green Book [UKHSA, 2025], which states that 'From September 2025, Shingrix® should be offered to all severely immunosuppressed individuals aged 18 years and over (with no upper age limit)' and details that people taking DMARDs are included in the definition of severely immunosuppressed individuals. Accordingly, the BSR also advises shingles vaccination for people taking DMARDs [BSR, 2026].
General principles of DMARD monitoring
How should I monitor a person using a DMARD?
How should I monitor a person using a conventional DMARD?
- Monitoring a person on a DMARD usually includes periodic measurement of full blood count (FBC), electrolytes, renal and liver function, and serum albumin as well as advising the person to self-monitor for signs and symptoms suggestive of toxicity or myelosuppression.
- Carry out ongoing monitoring in primary care as per the shared care arrangement. While treatment is being established and stabilised, monitoring will be carried out in secondary care.
- The British Society for Rheumatology recommends the following monitoring schedules for most conventional DMARDs. Testing frequency is largely based on the person's risk of DMARD toxicity, which should be determined by the prescribing specialist:
- Low‑risk of DMARD toxicity — people with normal BMI, no comorbidities, and normal baseline blood tests.
- Two weeks after commencing treatment, then monthly for 3 months, then after a further 3 months, then every 6 months.
- Total tests in first year: 6 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, then 26, then 50).
- Medium‑risk of DMARD toxicity — people with elevated BMI, type 2 diabetes, or regular alcohol intake (up to 10 units/week), but normal baseline blood tests.
- Two weeks after commencing treatment, then monthly for 6 months, then every 3 months.
- Total tests in first year: 9 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, then 26, 38, 50).
- High‑risk of DMARD toxicity — people with multiple comorbidities, who are taking interacting medications (such as anticoagulants, anti‑seizure drugs), or have borderline renal function.
- Two weeks after commencing treatment, then every two weeks for three months, then monthly.
- Total tests in first year: 16 (Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, then 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, 46, 50).
- Low‑risk of DMARD toxicity — people with normal BMI, no comorbidities, and normal baseline blood tests.
- For information on interpreting monitoring results, see the section on When to seek specialist advice.
- Be aware that additional monitoring required for specific conventional DMARDs includes:
- Ciclosporin — monthly monitoring may be required longer term. Blood pressure and HbA1c should be measured every three months. Magnesium should be measured every six months.
- Leflunomide — blood pressure and weight should be measured at each monitoring appointment.
- Hydroxychloroquine — annual retinopathy monitoring is indicated after five years of HCQ treatment, as well as in people taking HCQ greater than 5 mg/kg, those with impaired renal function, or with other independent risk factors for retinopathy.
- Ensure that the person has been offered/advised of the need for retinopathy monitoring.
- Tacrolimus — monthly monitoring may be required longer term but may then be reduced to every two to three months once the disease and treatment are stable. Blood pressure and HbA1c should be measured every 3 months.
How should I monitor a person using a biologic DMARD?
- Treatment will be initiated and stabilised by a specialist, with monitoring carried out in secondary care during this period.
- If ongoing primary care monitoring is required, this should be clearly outlined in a shared-care arrangement.
- All people taking a biologic DMARD should be reviewed in a specialist department at least every 6 months.
- People at higher risk of adverse effects (such as those at high risk of TB) should be reviewed every 3 months.
- People taking a biologic DMARD (except tocilizumab) should be offered routine monitoring blood tests (FBC, creatinine/calculated GFR, ALT and/or AST and albumin) every three to six months.
- For people receiving primary care monitoring due to concurrent use of a conventional DMARD, additional testing may not be required. Seek specialist advice if uncertain.
- Biologics requiring additional blood tests include:
- Tocilizumab — full blood count (FBC), liver function every 4 weeks.
- Rituximab — immunoglobulin levels (baseline and periodic).
How should I monitor a person using a synthetic targeted DMARD?
- Treatment will be initiated and stabilised by a specialist, with monitoring carried out in secondary care during this period.
- If ongoing primary care monitoring is required, this should be clearly outlined in a shared-care arrangement.
- People using apremilast should be monitored for psychiatric symptoms (including depression, suicidal ideation and behaviour).
- People using a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, or upadacitinib) should be offered blood tests (FBC, liver and renal function) every three months. Lipid profile should be checked after 12 weeks, then periodically.
- Periodic skin examination is recommended in all people taking a JAK-I, particularly those at increased risk of skin cancer.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis [Holroyd, 2018], and Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs [Tran, 2019], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026], and individual Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs).
Shared care
- DMARDs are prescribed and monitored in primary care according to individualised shared-care arrangements provided by the specialist(s) who started and initially managed the person's treatment. Local guidelines may also exist. Although this CKS topic provides general advice regarding DMARD monitoring based on guidance from the BSR [BSR, 2026], readers should be aware of the importance of adhering to personalised specialist recommendations and local protocols.
Conventional DMARD monitoring
- The information on monitoring of conventional DMARDs is based on expert opinion in the BSR Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026].
- The BSR advises that most conventional DMARDs can be monitored similarly, with frequency of monitoring largely guided by the person's risk of DMARD toxicity.
- The 2026 BSR recommendations advise less frequent monitoring than previous (2017) version of the guideline.
- The guideline development group states that this is a more balanced approach that maintains patient safety while reducing unnecessary burden.
- Although no new clinical trials have directly compared different monitoring schedules, experience during the COVID‑19 pandemic offered valuable real‑world insight. During that period, monitoring was reduced out of necessity to protect vulnerable people, limit infection risk in healthcare settings, and preserve capacity for acute and high‑dependency care.
- Despite these constraints, outcomes did not worsen significantly, suggesting that some patients may safely be monitored less often.
- The guideline development group concluded that monitoring should be tailored to the individual. A standard schedule provides a useful starting point, but certain characteristics—such as comorbidities, interacting medicines, or reduced kidney function—can increase the likelihood of toxicity. In these situations, a more frequent monitoring schedule is appropriate to ensure safe and effective treatment.
- The information on monitoring of conventional DMARDs is based on expert opinion in the BSR Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026].
Biologic DMARD monitoring
- The information on monitoring of biologic DMARDs is based on expert opinion in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis [Holroyd, 2018], and Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs [Tran, 2019], and the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026].
- The BSR states that there is no evidence on the optimal monitoring requirements for people receiving biologics but, in view of the potential risks and need to ensure a satisfactory clinical response, review should be carried out at least every 6 months by a rheumatology specialist [Holroyd, 2018].
- The BSR also recommends that people prescribed a biologic (other than tocilizumab) should have monitoring blood tests (FBC, creatinine/calculated GFR, ALT and/or AST and albumin) every three to six months [Holroyd, 2018].
- The information on monitoring of biologic DMARDs is based on expert opinion in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis [Holroyd, 2018], and Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs [Tran, 2019], and the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026].
Targeted synthetic DMARD monitoring
- The information on monitoring of targeted synthetic DMARDs is based on information from the BNF [BNF, 2026] and extrapolated from within individual drug SPCs which describe common adverse effects [EMC, 2025a; EMC, 2025b; EMC, 2025c; EMC, 2025d; EMC, 2025e; EMC, 2026].
- The SPC for apremilast highlights that use has been associated with psychiatric disorders, including suicidal ideation [EMC, 2026]. The BNF highlights that prescribers should monitor for psychiatric symptoms (including depression, suicidal ideation and behaviour) and discontinue treatment if new or worsening psychiatric symptoms are identified [BNF, 2026].
- The BNF advises that people taking a JAK-I should be offered periodic monitoring of liver function; lipid profile 8 weeks after treatment initiation and then periodically, lymphocytes at baseline and every 3 months thereafter; neutrophils and haemoglobin at baseline, after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment and every 3 months thereafter [BNF, 2026]. As treatment is generally established in secondary care, CKS has advised ongoing monitoring of full blood counts 3-monthly, and (pragmatically) liver function at the same interval.
- CKS did not locate any specific guidance regarding monitoring of renal function. The monitoring recommendation is therefore pragmatic, based on what CKS consider good clinical practice as well as extrapolated from guidance about monitoring other DMARDs.
- The BNF highlights an MHRA recommendation for periodic skin examination in all people taking a JAK-I, particularly those at increased risk of skin cancer [BNF, 2026].
When should I seek specialist advice for a person taking a DMARD?
- Note: when reviewing monitoring results:
- Be aware of trends as well as absolute values — many minor changes are transient and resolve spontaneously.
- For minor changes or results around the upper limit of normal/lower limit of normal (ULN/LLN), consider repeating tests.
- Consider alternative causes for laboratory abnormalities, such as altered disease activity or intercurrent illness.
- Be alert for persistent or recurrent abnormal values or progressively worsening results — a significant change from the previous test may be cause for concern and could warrant interruption of treatment.
- Be aware of trends as well as absolute values — many minor changes are transient and resolve spontaneously.
- Ensure that the shared-care arrangement includes details of
- For people on a disease‑modifying anti‑rheumatic drug (DMARD), take action if monitoring shows:
- Platelets less than LLN — if significant fall, interrupt DMARD and contact rheumatology; if persistent/recurrent fall, discuss with rheumatology.
- Neutrophils less than 1.6 × 10⁹/L — if significant fall, interrupt DMARD and contact rheumatology; if persistent/recurrent fall, discuss with rheumatology.
- Lymphocytes less than LLN — if downward trend continues, contact rheumatology.
- Eosinophils greater than ULN — If the person is taking methotrexate, stop the drug, assess for pneumonitis, and contact rheumatology. If the person is taking minocycline or sulfasalazine, stop the drug, assess for hypersensitivity and contact rheumatology.
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate transaminase (AST):
- Greater than 2x ULN — if significant rise, interrupt DMARD and contact rheumatology. If persistent/recurrent rise, discuss with rheumatology.
- Greater than 3x ULN — stop DMARD for 2 weeks and arrange repeat test. Contact rheumatology if persistent.
- Renal function — if declining, investigate cause, and contact rheumatology for advice on monitoring and dosing.
- Albumin less than LLN — if no alternative cause, contact rheumatology.
- For people on any DMARD, consider pausing treatment and seeking urgent specialist advice if they develop signs and symptoms suggesting myelosuppression, drug toxicity, or another serious adverse effect. Clinical features include::
- Skin or mucosal reactions (rash, pruritus, mouth/throat ulcers).
- Sore throat.
- Fever.
- Unexplained bruising or bleeding.
- Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, or weight loss.
- Diffuse alopecia.
- Breathlessness, cough, or signs of infection.
- Peripheral neuropathy.
- For people on a biologic DMARD, consider pausing treatment and seeking urgent specialist advice if they develop:
- Cough, haemoptysis, or weight loss (symptoms of tuberculosis).
- Signs or symptoms of heart failure, or worsening heart failure (particularly with a TNF-inhibitor). For more information, see the CKS topic on Heart failure - chronic.
- Shortness of breath or dry cough (symptoms of interstitial lung disease).
- Skin rashes.
- Abdominal pain or new abdominal symptoms.
- Also seek specialist advice if there is suspicion of disease flare/loss of efficacy of treatment.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System Shared Care Guidelines for the use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) [Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System, 2026], the American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [Fraenkel, 2021], the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) for tocilizumab [EMC, 2024], and the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026].
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis [Holroyd, 2018] and Guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [BSR, 2026], the Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs [Tran, 2019], the Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust DMARDs Shared care prescribing guidelines [Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 2024], the Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System Shared Care Guidelines for the use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) [Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System, 2026] , the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2026], and manufacturers' Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs). The rationale for the individual recommendations is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation sections.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of DMARDs.
Search dates
November 2021 - 1 March 2026
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp Biological Products/, biologics.tw, exp Antirheumatic Agents/, DMARD.tw, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.tw, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.tw, anti-tumor necrosis factor.tw, anti-tnf$.tw, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors.tw, exp Monitoring, Physiologic/, Drug Monitoring/, patient monitor$.tw, monitor$.tw, biologic therapm$
- (Disease-modifying antirheumatic*).ti,ab.
- (DMARD or bDMARD or cDMARD).ti,ab.
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Arthritis Foundation (2025) DMARDs fact sheet. Arthritis Foundation. https://www.arthritis.org [Free Full-text]
- Smith, C.H., Yiu, Z.Z.N., Bale, T., et al. (2023) British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for biologic therapy for psoriasis 2023: a pragmatic update. British Journal of Dermatology 190(2), 270-272. [Abstract]
- Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (2024) DMARDs: Shared care prescribing guidelines. Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. https://best.barnsleyccg.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- BNF (2026) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Tucker, L., Allen, A., Chandler, D., et al. (2022) The 2022 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 61(9), e255-e266. [Abstract]
- Bechman K, Song K, Abhishek A, et al. (2026) The 2025 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the prescription and monitoring of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Rheumatology (Oxford) 65(2), keaf522. [Abstract]
- EMC (2024) SPC for RoActemra 162 mg Solution for Injection in Pre-Filled Syringe. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025a) SPC for Cibinqo 100 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025b) SPC for Baricitinib Lilly 2 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025c) SPC for Jyseleca 100 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025d) SPC for XELJANZ 10 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2025e) SPC for RINVOQ 15 mg prolonged-release tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- EMC (2026) SPC for Apremilast 30 mg Film-coated Tablet. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Fraenkel, L., Bathon, J.M., England, B.R., et al. (2021) 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis care & research. Wiley. [Free Full-text]
- Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care System (2026) Shared Care Guidelines for the use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). HWICS. https://www.hwics.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Holroyd, C.R., Seth, R., Bukhari, M., et al. (2018) The British Society for Rheumatology biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology, 1-40. [Abstract]
- NICE (2020) Rheumatoid arthritis in adults: management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Tran, G. and Gough, A (2019) Yorkshire Rheumatology Regional Guidelines for the monitoring of adult patients on conventional disease modifying drugs, biologic drugs and targeted synthetic drugs. Bradford Hospitals NHS. https://www.bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- UKHSA (2025) The Green Book: Shingles (herpes zoster). UK Health Security Agency.