This site is intended for Healthcare Professionals only
Back to CKS

Infections and infestations Oral health

Candida - oral

Last revised in March 2025

Candida is a yeast-like fungus which is part of the normal commensal flora of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Candida - oral: Summary

  • Candida is a yeast-like fungus which is part of the normal commensal flora of the human gastrointestinal tract.
  • Colonization with Candida species is usually asymptomatic. However, if mucosal barriers are disrupted or defences lowered, it can cause infections along a spectrum from  superficial mucocutaneous disorders to invasive disseminated disease involving multiple organs. 
  • Oral candidiasis is most commonly caused by Candida albicans.
  • There are different types of oral candidiasis, including pseudomembranous candidiasis, denture stomatitis and chronic plaque-like candidiasis.
  • Comorbidities which increase the risk of candidal infections include diabetes mellitus, severe anaemia, and immunocompromise (such as due to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, HIV infection, and AIDS). Other risk factors include poor dental hygiene; local trauma; smoking; the use of broad spectrum antibiotics, or inhaled or oral corticosteroids; and malnutrition.
  • Admission to hospital should be arranged if there is widespread infection (such as oesophageal candidiasis characterized by difficulty or pain on swallowing, or retrosternal pain), or the person is systemically unwell.
  • If treating an immunocompetent person, a topical antifungal should be prescribed.
    • Miconazole oral gel is recommended first-line for children aged 4 months and over (unlicensed for use in a child aged younger than 4 months, or 5–6 months for an infant born pre-term). If miconazole oral gel is unsuitable, nystatin suspension (unlicensed for use in neonates) should be offered.
  • If topical treatment is ineffective, infection is extensive or severe, or the person is significantly immunocompromised: 
    • For people aged 16 years and older, oral fluconazole should be prescribed for at least 14 days after which response to treatment should be reviewed. If the infection has not completely resolved, consideration should be given to treating with oral fluconazole for a further 7 days (referral should be arranged if the infection persists after this and monitoring for hepatotoxicity considered if treatment is for >21 days); swabbing to identify the causative organism; seeking specialist advice, or arranging referral to a dermatologist. Clinical judgement should be used, taking into account the severity of infection (there should be a low threshold for early referral if infection is severe), the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
    • For children younger than 16 years of age, or if fluconazole is contraindicated, specialist advice should be sought.
  • People taking immunosuppressive treatment or people who are HIV positive often need more intensive treatment.
  • Referral should also be arranged, or specialist advice sought, if:
    • The person has recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis.
    • The person has breakthrough candidal infection while receiving preventive treatment (which may indicate candidal resistance).
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis. 
  • Referral for biopsy should be considered for people with chronic plaque-like candidiasis which is unresponsive to treatment, as it carries a risk of malignancy.

Have I got the right topic?

From birth onwards.

This CKS topic covers the assessment and management of oral candidiasis in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised people.

This CKS topic does not cover the management of oral candidiasis in people receiving palliative care, the management of children who are receiving treatment that may cause immunosuppression or children who are HIV positive, or the prevention of candidal infections in susceptible groups.

There are separate CKS topics on Aphthous ulcer, Candida - female genital, Candida - skin, Herpes simplex - oral, Palliative care - oral, and Sore throat - acute.

The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.

How up-to-date is this topic?

Changes

March 2025 — minor update. Dose of fluconazole aligned to BNF. 

Previous changes

December 2024 — minor update. Length of course of treatments amended to align with BNF recommendations. 

October 2023 — minor update. Information added that the manufacturers of fluconazole advise a washout period of approximately 1 week (5-6 half-lives) before becoming pregnant, in line with the updated summary of product characteristics.

May 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.

May 2021 — minor update. Information that unexplained oral candidiasis is an HIV indicator condition has been added to this topic in line with the British HIV Association/British Association for Sexual Health and HIV/British Infection Association Adult HIV testing guidelines 2020.

September 2019 — minor update. The section on management of oral candida in children, and the prescribing section have been updated to clarify that the use of oral miconazole gel in children aged under 4 months is unlicensed.

August 2017 — minor update. Changes to the drug interactions section for miconazole gel in accordance with changes to the manufacturer's summary of product characteristics. 

May 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in April 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made, but the topic has been restructured.

December 2016 — minor update. The adverse effects of miconazole oral gel have been updated in line with the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

November 2016 — minor update. The use of miconazole gel in people taking warfarin has been clarified, to take into account the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Drug safety update Topical miconazole, including oral gel: reminder of potential for serious interactions with warfarin. 

January 2014 — minor update. Text updated in line with the SPC for miconazole oral gel in the Prescribing Information section to highlight the risk of choking in infants and young children when miconazole oral gel is applied to the mouth.  

December 2013 — minor update. Text updated to reflect that the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has suspended the marketing authorization for oral ketoconazole. It should no longer be prescribed for the treatment of fungal infections.

August 2013 — minor update to the text to reflect recent guidance from the EMA regarding the use of oral ketoconazole.

July 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in June 2013 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of this topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.

November 2012 — minor update. The links to the electronic medicines website (www.medicines.org.uk) have been updated.

October 2009 — minor update. Minor wording change regarding the use of miconazole oral gel in children aged 4 months and younger.

April to September 2009 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.

September 2008 — minor correction to the Changes section.

June 2008 — minor update to remove nystatin pastilles because they have been discontinued. Text regarding nystatin pastilles has been removed as well as prescriptions. Minor update to text to reflect the change in licence for miconazole oral gel.

April 2008 — minor update to the text for oral ketoconazole to reflect the most recent MHRA guidance.

July 2007 — minor update to text and prescription added for miconazole oral gel (children under 2 years).

July to September 2006 — reviewed. Validated in December 2006 and published in January 2007. This guidance has been reviewed, restructured and updated following a full literature review. There are no major changes to the recommendations. An evidence section has been added.

November 2005 — minor technical update. 

October 2003 — written. Validated in December 2003 and published in February 2004.

Update

New evidence

Evidence-based guidelines

No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 May 2022.

HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)

No new HTAs since 1 May 2022.

Economic appraisals

No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 May 2022.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 May 2022.

Primary evidence

No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 May 2022.

New policies

No new national policies or guidelines since 1 May 2022.

New safety alerts

No new safety alerts since 1 May 2022.

Changes in product availability

No changes in product availability since 1 May 2022.

Goals and outcome measures

Goals

To support primary healthcare professionals to:

  • Make an accurate diagnosis of oral candidiasis and assess its severity and extent.
  • Treat oral candidiasis in immunocompetent people and in people who are immunosuppressed.
  • Arrange admission or referral as appropriate.
  • Provide appropriate advice to people with oral candidal infection and/or their family/carers.

Outcome measures

No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.

Audit criteria

No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.

QOF indicators

No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.

QIPP - Options for local implementation

No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.

NICE quality standards

No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.

Background information

What is it?

  • Candida is a yeast-like fungus which is part of the normal commensal flora of the human gastrointestinal tract [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021].
    • Colonization with Candida is usually asymptomatic. However, where mucosal barriers are disrupted or if the host's defences are lowered, it can cause infections (candidiasis) ranging from non-life threatening superficial mucocutaneous disorders to invasive disseminated disease involving multiple organs.
  • The most common forms of oral candidiasis are pseudomembranous candidiasis (often called oral thrush), erythematous candidiasis (also known as atrophic oral candidiasis), denture stomatitis, and angular cheilitis [Lu, 2021]. Other forms include hyperplastic oral candidiasis (plaque-like oral candidiasis) and median rhomboid glossitis. See the section on Diagnosis for more information.

What are the causes and risk factors?

  • There are over 20 Candida species that can cause infection in humans [Mallya, 2019] [Hughes, 2020] [Lu, 2021].
    • Oral candidiasis is most commonly caused by Candida albicans, although it can occasionally be caused by other Candida species, such as C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis. 
  • Oral candida may be described as 'a disease of the diseased' —  an opportunistic pathogen [Lewis, 2017].
  • Risk factors for oral candidiasis include [BMJ Best Practice, 2019] [Vila, 2020]  [Lu, 2021]:
    • Extremes of ages — due to immature or weakened immunity. In addition, saliva is known to be protective and elderly people are more likely to have reduced salivary flow (xerostomia) which increases their risk.
    • Immunocompromise or systemic immunosuppression. This covers a wide spectrum of conditions, including:
      • Haematological cancer (for example acute leukaemia).
      • Chemotherapy and radiotherapy (for the treatment of cancer).
      • HIV infection and AIDS.
    • Recent or concurrent use of drugs that promote candidal growth, particularly broad spectrum antibiotics and inhaled or oral corticosteroids.
    • Diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) — chronic hyperglycemia is associated with impaired wound healing and higher susceptibility to infections [Martarano-Fernandes, 2020].
    • Other endocrine disorders or disturbances, including undiagnosed hypo-endocrine states (such as hypothyroidism or Addison's disease), and pregnancy — due to reduced effectiveness of the immune response.
    • Dental prostheses — possibly due to enhanced adherence of Candida to the acrylic, ill-fitted appliances, decreased saliva flow under the denture surfaces, or inadequate hygiene.
    • Poor dental hygiene — dental caries is associated with candidiasis [Xiao, 2018] and expert opinion is that regular oral and dental hygiene with periodic oral examination will prevent most cases of oral candidiasis [Lu, 2021].
    • Local trauma, including mucosal irritation.
    • Smoking — this is regarded as a significant cause of oral candidiasis, particularly median rhomboid glossitis, and smoking cessation alone may clear infection in these people.
    • Poor diet — unbalanced dietary intake of refined sugars, carbohydrates, and dairy products (containing high content of lactose) might serve as growth enhancers by reducing the pH levels and hence favouring overgrowth of Candida. 
    • Nutritional deficiency — iron is the most common deficient essential micronutrient implicated in the colonization of Candida, as iron deficiency diminishes the fungistatic action of transferrin and other iron-dependant enzymes. Other nutrients frequently deficit in chronic candidiasis include essential fatty acids, folic acid, vitamins A, B6, and B12, magnesium, selenium, and zinc.
    • Impaired salivary function — reduced or absent salivation can predispose to oral candidiasis, as the antimicrobial proteins in saliva prevent candidal overgrowth [Mallya, 2019]. 

      [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2016] 

How common is it?

  • Candida is part of the normal commensal flora in the human digestive tract. The oral carriage is reported to be [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]:
    • 30–45% in healthy adults.
    • 45% in neonates.
    • 45–65% in healthy children.
  • Oral candidiasis is the most common human opportunistic fungal infection of the oral cavity [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. However, it is rare in healthy adults and older children, and tends to affect:
    • Young children and infants (due to immature immunity) — it affects about 5% of newborns, increasing to 14% in the fourth week of life before decreasing gradually thereafter.
    • Older, debilitated people (due to weakened immunity) — up to 10% of debilitated, older people are affected.
    • People with compromised or suppressed immune systems:
      • Oropharyngeal candidiasis affects between 15–60% of people with haematological or oncological cancer during periods of immunosuppression [Pankhurst, 2013].
      • About 50% of people receiving chemotherapy (for the treatment of cancer) and 70% of people receiving radiation treatment experience oral candidiasis [Hughes, 2020].
      • Oral candidiasis occurs in about 90% of people with AIDS [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. A 2021 systematic review found that in children with HIV/AIDS, the overall prevalence of oral candidiasis was 23.9% [Rafat, 2021]. HIV treatment was associated with a lower risk of candidiasis.
    • People with additional risk factors, including:
      • Diabetes mellitus — studies on the prevalence of oral mucosal disorders in people with diabetes showed higher prevalence of oral mucosal disorders (including median rhomboid glossitis and denture stomatitis) in people with diabetes compared with people without: 45% in people with type 1 diabetes compared with 25% in people without, and 45–88% in people with type 2 diabetes compared with 38–45% in people without [González-Serrano, 2016].
      • Dental prostheses — about 50–70% of denture wearers are predisposed to oral candidal infection [Martonffy, 2015].
      • Smoking — a prospective cross-sectional clinical study done to ascertain the prevalence and degree of carriage of Candida in the oral cavities of a non-cancer population found that smokers are nearly seven times more likely to have oral candidiasis than non-smokers, and people with high candidal colonization are more likely to be current smokers [Mun, 2016]. 

What are the complications?

  • Oral candidiasis can cause [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]:
    • Chronic pain and/or discomfort.
    • Impaired speech.
    • Impaired eating/chewing, thereby limiting oral intake of fluids and nutrition.
  • In people who are severely immunocompromised [CDC, 2017]:
    • Oesophageal candidiasis may develop, causing dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and/or odynophagia (painful swallowing).
    • The infection can spread through the upper gastrointestinal tract or blood, leading to severe systemic/invasive candidiasis.
      • Candidemia (the presence of Candida species in the blood) is the most common manifestation of invasive candidiasis, with an overall rate of 3.5 cases per 100,000 population in England in 2020 [PHE, 2021]. The highest rate was in males over 75 years  — 16.8 cases per 100,000.
      • Systemic/invasive candidiasis is a serious infection that can affect the heart, central nervous system, eyes, bones, and joints, leading to sepsis and/or organ-specific infections (such as pneumonia; meningitis; endocarditis; and mucocutaneous, osteoarticular, hepatosplenic, and peritoneal infections). It has an estimated mortality rate of up to 79% [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2016].

What is the prognosis?

  • The clinical course of candidal infection depends on the type of candidiasis and the presence of any associated risk factors [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. 
  • Generally [Pankhurst, 2013]:
    • In most people, untreated candidiasis persists for months or years unless associated risk factors are treated or eliminated.
    • In neonates, spontaneous cure of oropharyngeal candidiasis usually occurs after 3–8 weeks.
    • In HIV positive people, protease inhibitors used in highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) regimens have been shown to directly attenuate the adherence of Candida albicans to epithelial cells in vitro by inhibiting the action of Candida virulence factors.

Diagnosis of oral candida

How should I diagnose oral candidal infection?

  • The diagnosis of oral candidiasis is usually made by identifying clinical features and excluding other differential diagnoses. Clinical features vary according to the type of candidal infection.
    • Pseudomembranous oral candidiasis (oral thrush) presents with patches of curd-like, white or yellowish plaques that can occur anywhere in the mouth, especially the cheeks, gums, palate, and tongue. These are easily removed, revealing an underlying red base that is not usually painful.
      • Symptoms of acute pseudomembranous oral candidiasis are minimal (burning and itching sensation); however, chronic forms may involve the oesophageal mucosa, leading to dysphagia and chest pains.
      • It most commonly occurs in neonates, elderly people, people who are immunocompromised (especially people with AIDS, diabetes, cancer, or taking broad spectrum antibiotics), and people with xerostomia.
    • Acute erythematous oral candidiasis (acute atrophic oral candidiasis) presents with marked soreness and erythema, particularly on the palate and dorsum of the tongue. The filiform papillae disappear, and the dorsal surface of the tongue appears smooth.
      • It is usually asymptomatic or is accompanied by a mild burning and itching sensation.
      • It is the most common presentation in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent people, and commonly occurs after treatment with oral antibiotics.
    • Denture stomatitis (chronic erythematous candidiasis or chronic atrophic oral candidiasis) presents with redness, and rarely soreness, in the denture-bearing area. It affects about 50–70% of denture wearers.
    • Angular cheilitis presents with redness, fissuring, and soreness at the angle of the mouth.
      • It may be caused by bacterial infection (mainly Staphylococcus aureus) as well as yeast (Candida) species.
      • It tends to occur in older people (particularly those with reduced facial height or with ill-fitting dentures), younger immunocompromised people, and people with anaemia or vitamin B12 deficiency.
    • Chronic plaque-like oral candidiasis (chronic hyperplastic candidiasis) can manifest in nodular form or as white plaques on the cheek or tongue, that are not easily removed.
      • In this form of the disease, the Candida hyphae are not only found at epithelial surface level but also invade deeper levels where epithelial dysplasia can be observed.
      • It presents with mild symptoms, but has an associated increased risk of malignancy.
      • It is most common in men older than 30 years of age and in smokers.
    • Median rhomboid glossitis presents with a central, red, demarcated area of papillary atrophy of the tongue (from the posterior midline just anterior to the circumvallate papillae).
      • It affects less than 1% of the population and is usually seen in males, smokers, people using corticosteroid inhalers, and people with diabetes.
      • It can lead to recurrent or chronic atrophic candidal infection.
  • Swabs to detect C. albicans, or antibody serology, are not thought to be diagnostically helpful as candidal organisms are a normal commensal found in many healthy people. Oral carriage of Candida is reported to be:
    • 45–65% in healthy children.
    • 45% in neonates.
    • 30–45% in healthy adults.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations (and the clinical features of the different types of oral candidiasis) are based on expert opinion in the guidelines Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth published by the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], BMJ Best Practice - Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019], and Oral candidiasis: causes, types and treatment [Hughes, 2020] and on expert opinion in review article Oral candidosis: pathophysiology and best practice for diagnosis, classification and successful management [Lu, 2021].

  • Expert opinion in review articles is that the diagnosis of oral candidiasis is fundamentally clinical. Microbiological techniques are only required when the clinical diagnosis needs to be confirmed, for establishing a differential diagnosis, and when there are signs of resistance to antifungal treatment [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. 
  • The information on the percentage of denture wearers affected by denture stomatitis is based on information in a review article [Martonffy, 2015].
  • The information on the oral carriage of Candida is based on information in a review article [Patil, 2015].

What else might it be?

Differential diagnoses of oral candidiasis include:

  • Erythema migrans (also known as geographic tongue or benign migratory glossitis) — an inflammatory disorder affecting 1–3% of the population. It is associated with atopic conditions and psoriasis, and is characterized by central erythema caused by atrophy of the filiform papillae, and surrounding (slightly elevated) white-yellow borders.
  • Hairy tongue — accumulation of excess keratin on the filiform papillae of the dorsal tongue, leading to the formation of elongated strands that look like hair. The colour of the tongue can range from white or tan to black. It occurs most commonly in smokers, people with poor oral hygiene, and people who overuse mouthwashes.
  • Leukoplakia — a white patch or plaque on the mucosa that cannot be rubbed off. It may be caused by chronic exposure to irritants (particularly tobacco) or chronic infection (particularly oral candidal infection). It is most commonly a benign condition, but may be premalignant.
  • Lichen planus — an inflammatory condition that affects 1–2% of adults. There are two main types: 
    • Reticular lichen planus is characterized by bilateral, asymptomatic, white, lacy, striations (or papules) on the posterior buccal mucosa. This form is easily identifiable and does not usually require further investigation.
    • Erosive lichen planus manifests as zones of tender erythema and painful ulcers surrounded by white, radiating striae, and may require biopsy to rule out serious causes.
  • HIV infection — unexplained oral candidiasis is an HIV indicator condition. For more information, see the CKS topic on HIV infection and AIDS.  
  • Oral cancers, including:
    • Squamous cell carcinoma — early lesions are often asymptomatic, appear as areas of erythroplakia (red patch) or leukoplakia (white patch), and may be ulcerated or exophytic (growing outwards). As the lesion grows, it becomes more symptomatic.
    • Melanoma — the oral mucosa is primarily involved in less than 1% of melanomas. Lesions are largely macular, but may be nodular or pedunculated. The pigmentation varies from dark brown to blue-black; however, mucosa-coloured and white lesions may be seen, and erythema is observed when the lesions are inflamed. The palate and maxillary gingiva are involved in about 80% of people, but buccal mucosa, mandibular gingiva, and tongue lesions are also identified.
      • An amalgam tattoo (an iatrogenic lesion caused by traumatic implantation of dental amalgam into soft tissue) can sometimes be mistaken for melanoma. It is the most common localized pigmented lesion in the mouth.
    • Kaposi's sarcoma — discoloured patches, and occasionally nodules, that are usually red or purple and look similar to bruises.
  • Chemical or thermal burns  — these should be straightforward to distinguish with adequate history-taking (for example, aspirin use for toothache).

Basis for recommendation

The differential diagnoses of oral candidiasis are based on expert opinion in the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) guideline on Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice review article Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019].

Management

Scenario: Treatment of oral candida in children

From birth to 15 years.

How should I manage oral candidiasis in a child younger than 16 years of age who is not immunocompromised?

  • Admit the child if:
    • There is evidence of systemic illness (candidaemia).
    • There is widespread infection (such as oesophageal candidiasis, characterized by difficulty or pain on swallowing, or retrosternal pain).
  • Refer to a paediatrician or seek specialist advice if the child has extensive or severe oral candidiasis.
  • If the child can be managed in primary care:
    • Exclude risk factors for oral candidiasis, such as diabetes, haematinic deficiencies, and poor dental hygiene. 
      • Oral candidiasis is uncommon in people other than infants, denture wearers, and the elderly. In otherwise healthy people, it may be the first presentation of an undiagnosed risk factor.
    • Prescribe topical antifungal treatment.
      • Offer miconazole oral gel first-line for children aged 4 months and over (unlicensed for use in a child aged younger than 4 months, or 5–6 months for an infant born pre-term). Treatment should be for at least 7 days after lesions have healed or symptoms have cleared. 
      • If miconazole oral gel is unsuitable, offer oral nystatin suspension (unlicensed for use in neonates).
      • See the prescribing information sections on miconazole oral gel and nystatin suspension for information on prescribing these treatments, including contraindications, cautions, adverse effects, and possible drug interactions.
    • Give appropriate lifestyle advice to aid healing and prevent recurrence. In particular:
      • Advise on good dental hygiene.
      • If the child is using an inhaled corticosteroid, advise the following: good inhaler technique; rinsing the mouth with water (or cleaning the teeth) after inhalation, to remove any drug particles; using a spacer device to reduce the impaction of particles in the oral cavity; and stepping down the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when appropriate. See the section on Minimizing the risks of adverse effects in the CKS topic on Corticosteroids - inhaled for more information. 
    • Refer to a paediatrician or seek specialist advice if the child:
      • Does not respond adequately to at least 2 weeks of treatment with miconazole and/or nystatin. 
      • Has recurrent episodes of oral candidal infection, or there is suspicion the child is immunocompromised.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF for children, 2022], and on expert opinion in the review article from BMJ Best Practice: Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019] and other review articles [Hughes, 2020; Lu, 2021].

Admission
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that systemic/invasive candidiasis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. See the section on Complications for more information.
Initial referral (or seeking specialist advice)
  • The BNF for Children recommends that oral candidal infection that fails to respond to 2 weeks of treatment requires further assessment by a specialist [BNF for children, 2022]. Treatment options that may be suitable for initiation in secondary care include oral fluconazole, or itraconazole where there is fluconazole resistance.
Excluding risk factors
  • Oral candidiasis is common in infants, but in older children, it may signify immune deficiency or other illness [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Vila, 2020; Lu, 2021]. CKS, therefore recommends excluding risk factors in an otherwise healthy child with oral candidiasis.
  • Expert opinion in 2 review articles is that the treatment of oral candidiasis should include recognizing and eliminating the underlying causes, such as ill-fitting oral appliances, history of medications (such as antibiotics and corticosteroids), immunological and endocrine disorders, and nutritional deficiency [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021].
Antifungal treatment
  • Miconazole has a broad spectrum of activity against fungal and yeast species .
    • Good evidence from two comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) shows that topical miconazole is considerably more effective than nystatin suspension for the treatment of oral candidal infection in infants (although there is a lack of placebo-controlled trials for either drug) [Hoppe and Hahn, 1996; Hoppe, 1997].
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of miconazole for oral candidiasis and found that it was more effective than nystatin for thrush, and seemed to be more effective than other formulations with regard to long-term results [Zhang, 2016]. However, the authors concluded that future studies that are adequately powered, large-scale, and well-designed are needed to provide higher-quality evidence for the management of oral candidiasis (17 trials were included in this review, but most were considered to have a high or moderate level of bias).
    • Oral candidal infection is uncommon in older children, so there is a lack of direct evidence from RCTs in this group. However, the use of miconazole oral gel is supported by pharmacological principles, historical use, and extrapolation of clinical data from trials in younger children and infants (in whom oral candidal infection is common because their immune system is immature).
      • The Summary of Product Characteristics for miconazole oral gel states that use in children aged under 4 months is contraindicated. However, the BNF for Children does not list this as a contraindication and states that use in children aged under 4 months or during the first 5–6 months of life of an infant born pre-term is unlicensed, and provides dosage information for neonates [BNF for children, 2022].
  • Nystatin suspension is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is applied locally to the mouth for treating local fungal infections. 
    • It is not suitable as first-line treatment because two comparative RCTs found that it is not as effective as topical miconazole in the treatment of infants with oral candidal infection [Hoppe and Hahn, 1996; Hoppe, 1997].
Lifestyle advice
  • These recommendations are based on the fact that poor dental hygiene and inhaled corticosteroids are risk factors for oral candidiasis. See the section on Risk factors for more information.
Managing treatment failure
  • About 85% of infants experience clinical cure with miconazole after 1 week, increasing to 99% after 2 weeks [Hoppe, 1997]. Therefore, it is worth considering an additional week of treatment if the initial course is not fully effective.
  • If miconazole has proved ineffective, it could be due to the presence of a resistant candidal organism (such as Candida glabrata or C. krusei). Nystatin may be considered as an alternative but the suspension has a high sucrose content which may increase the risk of dental caries with prolonged use [BMJ Best Practice, 2019].
Referral
  • The BNF for children recommends referral for investigation if candidal infection fails to respond to 2 weeks of antifungal treatment [BNF for children, 2022].
  • The recommendation to refer or seek specialist advice if there is suspicion of immunocompromise is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Treatment not recommended
  • Oral fluconazole is not recommended for use in children without seeking specialist advice because it is extensively absorbed and has the potential for adverse effects [BNF for children, 2022]. Expert opinion in a review article is that the use of fluconazole in children is generally felt to be unnecessary for what is considered to be a minor illness [Su et al, 2008].

Scenario: Adults and young people (not immunocompromised)

From age 16 years onwards.

How should I manage oral candidiasis in a person aged 16 years or older who is not immunocompromised?

Admit the person if:

  • There is evidence of systemic illness (candidaemia).
  • There is widespread infection (such as oesophageal candidiasis, characterized by difficulty or pain on swallowing, or retrosternal pain).

If the person can be managed in primary care:

  • Exclude risk factors for oral candidiasis, such as diabetes and haematinic deficiencies.
    • Oral candidiasis is uncommon in people other than infants, denture wearers, and the elderly. In otherwise healthy people, it may be the first presentation of an undiagnosed risk factor.
  • Prescribe antifungal treatment.
    • If the infection is mild and localized, prescribe topical antifungal treatment.
      • Offer miconazole oral gel first-line.
      • Treatment should be continued for at least 7 days after lesions have healed or symptoms have cleared. 
      • If miconazole is unsuitable, offer nystatin suspension.
        • Nystatin treatment is recommended for 7 days and continued for 48 hours after lesions have resolved. 
      • See the prescribing information sections on Miconazole oral gel and Nystatin suspension for information on prescribing these treatments, including contraindications, cautions, adverse effects, and possible drug interactions.
    • If the infection is extensive or severe infection, consider one of the following: 
      • Prescribe fluconazole 200–400 mg on day one, followed by 100–200 mg once daily for 7–21 days. See the prescribing information section on oral fluconazole for information on prescribing this treatment.
      • Seek specialist advice or refer to an oral surgeon.
  • Give appropriate lifestyle advice to aid healing and prevent recurrence. In particular:
    • Advise on good dental hygiene.
    • If the person is a smoker, offer advice on smoking cessation. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for detailed information.
    • If the person is using an inhaled corticosteroid, advise the following: good inhaler technique; rinsing the mouth with water (or cleaning the teeth) after inhalation, to remove any drug particles; using a spacer device to reduce the impaction of particles in the oral cavity; and stepping down the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when appropriate.
    • If the person wears dentures, advise them to:
      • Leave the dentures out for at least 6 hours in each 24-hour period to promote healing of the gums. If the gums are inflamed, they may benefit from the dentures being left out for longer.
      • Clean dentures by brushing and then soaking them in a disinfectant solution (for example chlorhexidine or hexetidine) overnight. The dentures can be soaked in any solution marketed to sterilize baby's bottles (providing the dentures contain no metal).
      • Allow the dentures to air-dry after disinfection — this also kills adherent Candida.
      • Brush the mucosal surface regularly with a soft brush.
      • See a dentist to correct ill-fitting dentures.
    • If the person has diabetes, review diabetic control and manage accordingly, particularly if there are recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis. See the CKS topic on Diabetes - type 2 for detailed information.
      • For people taking a sulfonylurea (such as gliclazide), be aware of drug interactions with miconazole or fluconazole.
      • For people taking warfarin, be aware of the drug interaction with miconazole.
      • Do not prescribe miconazole to people who are taking a statin. Use nystatin.
  • Follow up people who have extensive or severe oral candidiasis (requiring oral fluconazole) after 14 days.
    • If the infection has completely resolved, stop treatment.
    • If the infection has not completely resolved, consider the following: extend the course of fluconazole for a further 7 days (refer to an oral surgeon if the infection persists after this); swab to identify the causative organism; seek specialist advice; or refer to an oral surgeon — use clinical judgement, taking into account the severity of infection (there should be a low threshold for early referral if infection is severe), the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
  • Also consider referring to an oral surgeon (or seeking specialist advice) if:
    • The person has recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis.
    • The person has breakthrough candidal infection while receiving preventive treatment (which may indicate candidal resistance).
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis. 
  • Consider referring for biopsy people with chronic plaque-like oral candidiasis that is unresponsive to treatment, as it carries a risk of malignancy.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in the Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update of the Infectious diseases society of America [Pappas, 2016], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2022], and several review articles Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth published by the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], BMJ Best Practice - Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019], and Oral candidiasis: causes, types and treatment [Hughes, 2020] and on expert opinion in review article Oral candidosis: pathophysiology and best practice for diagnosis, classification and successful management [Lu, 2021]. 

Admission
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that systemic/invasive candidiasis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. See the section on Complications for more information.
Excluding risk factors
  • Oral candidiasis is common in infants, but in adults and older children, it may signify immune deficiency or other illness 
  • [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Vila, 2020; Lu, 2021]. CKS, therefore recommends excluding risk factors in an otherwise healthy person with oral candidiasis.
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that the treatment of oral candidiasis should include recognizing and eliminating the underlying causes, such as ill-fitting oral appliances, history of medications (such as antibiotics and corticosteroids), immunological and endocrine disorders, and nutritional deficiency [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021].
Antifungal treatments
  • Miconazole has a broad spectrum of activity against fungal and yeast species.
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of miconazole for oral candidiasis and found that it was more effective than nystatin for thrush, and seemed to be more effective than other formulations with regard to long-term results [Zhang, 2016]. However, the authors concluded that future studies that are adequately powered, large-scale, and well-designed are needed to provide higher-quality evidence for the management of oral candidiasis (17 trials were included in this review, but most were considered to have a high or moderate level of bias).
    • Despite the general lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support the use of topical miconazole in the treatment of oral candidiasis in otherwise healthy adults and young people, its use is supported by pharmacological principles, historical use, and extrapolation of clinical data from trials in other groups (such as infants and people who are immunosuppressed).
    • Miconazole and the interaction with warfarin is mentioned in Oral candidiasis: causes, types and treatment [Hughes, 2020].
    • Miconazole and the interaction with statin medicines were the subject of a bulletin [Specialist Pharmacy Service, 2021].
  • Nystatin suspension is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is applied locally to the mouth for treating local fungal infections [BNF, 2022]: 
    • There is a lack of evidence from RCTs to support the effectiveness of nystatin suspension in the treatment of oral candidal infection in otherwise healthy adults and young people. However, systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest it is not as effective as topical miconazole or fluconazole and is therefore not suitable as first-line treatment [Lyu, 2016].
  • Fluconazole has a broad range of antifungal activity, including against Candida species. It is given orally for infections that do not respond to topical treatment (or when topical treatment cannot be used), and it may be necessary for people with moderate to severe disease [BMJ Best Practice, 2019].
    • Although there is a lack of evidence from RCTs to show the efficacy of fluconazole in immune competent adults and young people with oral candidiasis, recent systematic reviews show the superiority of fluconazole over nystatin [Lyu, 2016; Xiao, 2022].
    • The recommended dose and duration of fluconazole are based on the BNF [BNF, 2025] and the BMJ Best Practice article [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. Hughes points out that the evidence for efficacy is based on higher doses [Hughes, 2020].
Lifestyle advice
  • These recommendations are based on the fact that poor dental hygiene, inhaled corticosteroids, the use of dentures, smoking, and diabetes are risk factors for oral candidiasis. See the section on Risk factors for more information.
    • In addition for dentures:
      • Expert opinion is that for the management of denture-related candidiasis, disinfection of the denture, in addition to antifungal treatment, is recommended [Pappas, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2019].
      • Expert opinion in review articles is that chlorhexidine is an antiseptic with a broad-spectrum activity, including antimycotic activity against Candida species. It can be used as an effective disinfectant for dentures, and it inhibits adhesion of Candida [Garcia-Cuesta, 2014], [Lu, 2021]. However, people should be advised that chlorhexidine should not be used with nystatin, as both medicines become ineffective with use in combination [Lu, 2021].
    • In addition for diabetes, most experts agree that good control of blood glucose is important in the long-term management of oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. This will also have other wide-reaching benefits.
Follow up and managing treatment failure
  • CKS considers that it is reasonable to follow up people with extensive or severe candidiasis to ensure the infection has cleared and complications have not developed.
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that if initial treatment is not fully effective, extending treatment duration (from 14 to 21 days) is a reasonable option before expert advice or referral are sought [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. CKS recommends using clinical judgement to decide whether to give another course of fluconazole, swab to identify the causative organism, seek specialist advice, or refer to secondary care, taking into account the severity of infection, the individual concerned, and the initial response to treatment. 
    • The recommendation to consider swabbing is based on expert opinion in review articles, which state that microbiological techniques are required when the clinical diagnosis needs to be confirmed, for establishing a differential diagnosis, and in cases characterized by resistance to antifungal treatment [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Hughes, 2020; Lu, 2021].
Referral or seeking specialist advice
  • The BNF recommends referral for investigation if candidal infection fails to respond to 2 weeks of antifungal treatment [BNF, 2022]. Oral candidiasis is rare in otherwise healthy adults and young people [BMJ Best Practice, 2019], and widespread or severe infection may require further assessment by a specialist.
  • Expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021] and the BNF [BNF, 2022] is that biopsies are indicated in people with hyperplastic candidiasis, due to the increased risk of malignancy.
Treatments not recommended 
  • Oral itraconazole should be reserved for cases of fluconazole-resistant candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. Specialist advice should be obtained before initiating itraconazole treatment because of the increased risk of drug interactions and adverse effects.
  • Oral ketoconazole should no longer be prescribed for the treatment of fungal infections as the risk of liver damage outweighs the benefits. For this reason, the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) suspended its marketing authorization. See the MHRA website for more information.
  • Oral amphotericin is not recommended as there is a lack of trial evidence of efficacy in the treatment of oral candidiasis. It may be used as an adjunct to other systemic antimycotic drugs in severe disease [Lu, 2021].

Scenario: Adults (immunosuppressive treatment)

From age 18 years onwards.

How should I manage oral candidiasis in an adult who is receiving treatment(s) that may cause immunosuppression?

Admit the person if:

  • There is evidence of systemic illness (candidaemia).
  • There is widespread infection (such as oesophageal candidiasis, characterized by difficulty or pain on swallowing, or retrosternal pain).
    • Lower the threshold for admission in people who are markedly immunocompromised.

If the person can be managed in primary care:

  • Seek specialist advice before starting antifungal treatment if the person is:
    • Taking ciclosporin or oral tacrolimus, especially if these drugs are being used to suppress tissue rejection following transplantation.
    • Receiving chemotherapy.
  • For people taking oral corticosteroids or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs):
    • If the infection is mild and localized, prescribe topical treatment.
      • Offer miconazole oral gel first-line.
        • Treatment should be continued for at least 7 days after lesions have healed or symptoms have cleared. 
      • If miconazole is unsuitable, offer nystatin suspension. Nystatin may be preferable when considering possible adverse effects.
      • See the prescribing information sections on Miconazole oral gel and Nystatin suspension for information on prescribing these treatments.
    • If the infection is extensive or severe, consider one of the following options:
      • Prescribe fluconazole 200–400 mg on day one, followed by 100–200 mg once daily for 7–21 (or longer if necessary). See the prescribing information section on oral fluconazole for information on prescribing this treatment.
      • Seek specialist advice or refer to an oral surgeon.
    • If there is suspicion that DMARDs are causing marked immunosuppression, seek specialist advice and ensure blood parameters are being adequately monitored. See the CKS topic on DMARDs for more information.
  • Give appropriate lifestyle advice. In particular:
    • Advise on good dental hygiene.
    • If the person is a smoker, offer advice on smoking cessation. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for detailed information.
    • If the person is using an inhaled corticosteroid, advise the following: good inhaler technique; rinsing the mouth with water (or cleaning the teeth) after inhalation, to remove any drug particles; using a spacer device to reduce the impaction of particles in the oral cavity; and stepping down the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when appropriate.
    • If the person wears dentures, advise them to:
      • Leave the dentures out for at least 6 hours in each 24-hour period to promote healing of the gums. If the gums are inflamed, they may benefit from the dentures being left out for longer.
      • Clean dentures by brushing and then soaking them in a disinfectant solution (for example chlorhexidine or hexetidine) overnight. The dentures can be soaked in any solution marketed to sterilize baby's bottles (providing the dentures contain no metal).
      • Allow the dentures to air-dry after disinfection — this also kills adherent Candida.
      • Brush the mucosal surface regularly with a soft brush.
      • See a dentist to correct ill-fitting dentures.
    • If the person has diabetes, review diabetic control and manage accordingly, particularly if there are recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis. See the CKS topics on Diabetes - type 1 and Diabetes - type 2 for detailed information.
      • For people taking a sulphonylurea (such as gliclazide), be aware of drug interactions with miconazole or fluconazole.
  • Follow up the person after 7–14 days. If treatment has not been fully effective despite adequate adherence to treatment:
    • For people receiving topical treatment, consider:
      • Extending the course of treatment for a further 7 days, or
      • Switching to nystatin suspension (if miconazole was tried first-line) or oral fluconazole.
    • For people receiving oral fluconazole:
      • Consider the following: extend the course of fluconazole for a further 7 days (refer to an oral surgeon if the infection persists after this); swab to identify the causative organism; seek specialist advice; or refer to an oral surgeon. 
      • Use clinical judgement, taking into account the severity of infection (there should be a low threshold for early referral if infection is severe), the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
  • Also consider referring to an oral surgeon (or seeking specialist advice) if:
    • The person has recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis.
    • The person has breakthrough candidal infection while receiving preventive treatment (which may indicate candidal resistance).
    • The person has clinical features that preclude management in primary care.
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis. 
  • Consider referring for biopsy people with chronic plaque-like oral candidiasis that is unresponsive to treatment, as it carries a risk of malignancy.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in the Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update of the Infectious diseases society of America [Pappas, 2016], a Guide for health professionals addressing oral care for individuals in oncological treatment based on scientific evidence [Carvalho, 2018], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2022], and several review articles Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth published by the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], BMJ Best Practice - Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019], and Oral candidiasis: causes, types and treatment [Hughes, 2020] and on expert opinion in review article Oral candidosis: pathophysiology and best practice for diagnosis, classification and successful management [Lu, 2021]. 

Admission
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that systemic/invasive candidiasis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in people who are immunocompromised. The individual may be neutropenic. See the section on Complications for more information.
Seeking specialist advice before starting antifungal treatment in people taking ciclosporin or tacrolimus
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that fluconazole increases the plasma concentrations of these drugs. See the section on Drug interactions for more information.
Seeking specialist advice before starting antifungal treatment in people receiving chemotherapy
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that people receiving chemotherapy are likely to be taking drugs that cause complex interactions which may be difficult to manage in primary care.
  • Management of people with marked immunosuppression caused by chemotherapy or radiotherapy is primarily carried out in secondary care under specialist direction. If there is any doubt about management, referral should be considered or specialist advice sought, as the consequences of widespread or invasive candidiasis are particularly serious in people who are immunosuppressed [BMJ Best Practice, 2019].
Antifungal treatments
  • Miconazole has a broad spectrum of activity against fungal and yeast species .
    • There is a lack of published evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support the use of any specific antifungal drug in people with oral candidiasis who are receiving immunosuppressant drugs [Worthington et al, 2010; Carvalho, 2018]. However, it is reasonable to suppose it is effective based on historical use, clinical experience, and extrapolation of data in other groups.
  • Nystatin suspension is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is applied locally to the mouth for treating local fungal infections [BNF, 2022]. 
    • It has generally not been found to be as effective as other antimycotic drugs and is therefore not suitable as a first-line treatment [Lyu, 2016].
  • Fluconazole has a broad range of antifungal activity, including against Candida species . It is suitable for people on immunosuppressant drugs who have extensive or severe candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. It is systemically absorbed, which is an advantage for widespread candidal infection.
Seeking specialist advice if there is suspicion that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are causing marked immunosuppression
  • This recommendation is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Lifestyle advice
  • These recommendations are based on the fact that poor dental hygiene, inhaled corticosteroids, the use of dentures, smoking, and diabetes are also risk factors for oral candidiasis. See the section on Risk factors for more information.
    • In addition for dentures:
      • Expert opinion in review articles is that chlorhexidine is an antiseptic with a broad-spectrum activity, including antimycotic activity against Candida species. It can be used as an effective disinfectant for dentures, and it inhibits adhesion of Candida [Lu, 2021].
      • Expert opinion in a guideline is that for the management of denture-related candidiasis, disinfection of the denture, in addition to antifungal treatment, is recommended [Pappas, 2016].
    • In addition for diabetes, most experts agree that good control of blood glucose is important in the long-term management of oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. This will also have other health benefits.
Follow up and managing treatment failure
  • Oral candidiasis is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in people who are immunosuppressed, and it is reasonable to ensure treatment has been satisfactory and complications have not developed.
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that if initial treatment is not fully effective, extending treatment duration is a reasonable option before expert advice or referral are sought, provided deterioration has not occurred [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Hughes, 2020]. CKS recommends using clinical judgement to decide whether to give another course of fluconazole, swab to identify the causative organism, seek specialist advice, or refer to secondary care, taking into account the severity of infection, the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
    • The recommendation to consider swabbing is based on expert opinion review articles, which state that microbiological techniques are required when the clinical diagnosis needs to be confirmed, for establishing a differential diagnosis, and in cases characterized by resistance to antifungal treatment [Mallya, 2019], [Lu, 2021].
  • Advice in the BNF is that the duration of fluconazole treatment may be increased to over 21 days in people who are severely immunocompromised [BNF, 2025].
Referral or seeking specialist advice
  • The BNF recommends referral for investigation if candidal infection fails to respond to 1–2 weeks of antifungal treatment. Other referral criteria are based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice. 
  • Expert opinion in review articles and the BNF  is that biopsies are indicated in people with hyperplastic candidiasis, due to the increased risk of malignancy.
Treatments not recommended 
  • Miconazole mucoadhesive buccal tablets are licensed for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised people [BNF, 2022]. However, they are considerably more expensive than miconazole oral gel and are not currently recommended by the Scottish Medicines Consortium [Scottish Medicines Consortium, 2011]. For these reasons, CKS does not recommend its use in primary care.
  • Oral itraconazole should be reserved for cases of fluconazole-resistant candidiasis [Xiao, 2022]. Specialist advice should be obtained before initiating itraconazole therapy because of the increased risk of drug interactions and adverse effects.
  • Oral ketoconazole should no longer be prescribed for the treatment of fungal infections as the risk of liver damage outweighs the benefits. For this reason, the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has suspended its marketing authorisation [MHRA, 2013]. See the MHRA website for more information.
  • Oral amphotericin is not recommended as there is a lack of trial evidence of efficacy in the treatment of oral candidiasis. It is sometimes used as an adjunct to other systemic antimycotic drugs [Hughes, 2020].

Scenario: Adults (HIV positive)

From age 18 years onwards.

How should I manage an adult with oral candidiasis who is HIV positive?

Admit the person if:

  • There is evidence of systemic illness (candidaemia).
  • There is widespread infection (such as oesophageal candidiasis, characterized by difficulty or pain on swallowing, or retrosternal pain).
    • Lower the threshold for admission in people who are markedly immunocompromised.

If the person can be managed in primary care:

  • Prescribe oral fluconazole 200–400 mg on day one, followed by 100-200 mg once daily for 7–14 days provided the person is otherwise well and is not taking prophylactic antimycotic treatment.
  • Seek specialist advice before starting treatment if:
    • Oral candidiasis is extensive or severe.
    • Treatment with fluconazole for a previous episode of candidiasis was ineffective.
  • Give appropriate lifestyle advice. In particular:
    • Advise on good dental hygiene.
    • If the person is a smoker, offer advice on smoking cessation. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for detailed information.
    • If the person is using an inhaled corticosteroid, advise the following: good inhaler technique; rinsing the mouth with water (or cleaning the teeth) after inhalation, to remove any drug particles; using a spacer device to reduce the impaction of particles in the oral cavity; and stepping down the dose of inhaled corticosteroid when appropriate.
    • If the person wears dentures, advise them to:
      • Leave the dentures out for at least 6 hours in each 24-hour period to promote healing of the gums. If the gums are inflamed, they may benefit from the dentures being left out for longer.
      • Clean dentures by brushing and then soaking them in a disinfectant solution (for example chlorhexidine or hexidine) overnight. The dentures can be soaked in any solution marketed to sterilize baby's bottles (providing the dentures contain no metal).
      • Allow the dentures to air-dry after disinfection — this also kills adherent Candida.
      • Brush the mucosal surface regularly with a soft brush.
      • See a dentist to correct ill-fitting dentures.
    • If the person has diabetes, review diabetic control and manage accordingly, particularly if there are recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis. See the CKS topics on Diabetes - type 1 and Diabetes - type 2 for detailed information.
      • For people taking a sulphonylurea (such as gliclazide), be aware of drug interactions with miconazole or fluconazole.
  • Review the person after 7 days. 
    • If the infection has not completely resolved, consider the following: extend the course of fluconazole for a further 7 days (refer to an oral surgeon if the infection persists after this); swab to identify the causative organism; seek specialist advice; or refer to an oral surgeon.
    • Use clinical judgement, taking into account the severity of infection (there should be a low threshold for early referral if infection is severe), the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
  • Also consider referring to an oral surgeon (or seeking specialist advice) if:
    • The person has breakthrough candidiasis while taking preventive treatment (this may indicate candidal resistance).
    • The person has recurrent episodes of oral candidiasis.
    • There is doubt about the diagnosis. 
  • Consider referring for biopsy people with chronic plaque-like oral candidiasis that is unresponsive to treatment, as it carries a risk of malignancy.

Basis for recommendation

These recommendations are based on expert opinion in the Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update of the Infectious diseases society of America [Pappas, 2016], the British National Formulary (BNF) [BNF, 2022], and several review articles Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth published by the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], the British HIV Association (BHIVA) Guidelines for the management of opportunistic infection in people living with HIV; the clinical management of candidiasis [BHIVA, 2019] and BMJ Best Practice - Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019].

Admission
  • This recommendation is based on the fact that systemic/invasive candidiasis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in people who are immunocompromised. See the section on Complications for more information.
Antifungal treatment
  • Fluconazole has a broad range of antifungal activity, including against Candida species [BNF, 2022]. It is systemically absorbed, which is an advantage for widespread candidal infection.
  • For HIV-positive adults with oral candidiasis, the WHO guideline recommends oral fluconazole 100–150 mg for 7–14 days as the preferred treatment [WHO, 2014]. The BNF recommends 200–400 mg on day one followed by 100–200 mg once daily for 7–21 days and advises that the duration may be increased in people who are severely immunocompromised [BNF, 2025]. The British HIV Association Guidelines for the management of opportunistic infection in people living with HIV; the clinical management of candidiasis recommends fluconazole 100–200 mg for 7–14 days depending on severity and numbers of recurrence of episodes, with higher doses reserved for more severe and repeated infection [BHIVA, 2019].
  • Evidence from a Cochrane systematic review (search date: July 2009) that investigated the effectiveness of interventions for both the prevention and treatment of oral candidiasis in children and adults with HIV (n = 3445) showed that fluconazole is more effective than nystatin, and is effective at preventing candidiasis [Pienaar et al, 2010].
  • Expert opinion in guidelines and a review article is that systemic antifungals may be necessary for people with moderate to severe disease and people who are immunocompromised [Pappas, 2016; BMJ Best Practice, 2019; BHIVA, 2019].
Lifestyle advice
  • These recommendations are based on the fact that poor dental hygiene, inhaled corticosteroids, the use of dentures, smoking, and diabetes are also risk factors for oral candidiasis. See the section on Risk factors for more information.
    • In addition for dentures:
      • Expert opinion in review articles is that chlorhexidine is an antiseptic with a broad-spectrum activity, including antimycotic activity against Candida species. It can be used as an effective disinfectant for dentures, and it inhibits adhesion of Candida [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021].
      • Expert opinion in guidelines is that for the management of denture-related candidiasis, disinfection of the denture, in addition to antifungal treatment, is recommended [Pappas, 2016; BHIVA, 2019].
    • In addition for diabetes, most experts agree that good control of blood glucose is important in the long-term management of oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. This will also have other health benefits.
Follow up and managing treatment failure
  • Oral candidiasis is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in people who are immunosuppressed, and it is reasonable to ensure treatment has been satisfactory and complications have not developed.
  • Expert opinion in a review article is that if initial treatment is not fully effective, extending treatment duration is a reasonable option before expert advice or referral are sought, provided deterioration has not occurred [BMJ Best Practice, 2019]. CKS recommends using clinical judgement to decide whether to give another course of fluconazole, swab to identify the causative organism, seek specialist advice, or refer to secondary care, taking into account the severity of infection, the level of immunocompromise, and the response to treatment. 
    • The recommendation to consider swabbing is based on expert opinion in a review article, which states that microbiological techniques are required when the clinical diagnosis needs to be confirmed, for establishing a differential diagnosis, and in cases characterized by resistance to antifungal treatment [Lu, 2021].
Referral or seeking specialist advice
  • The BNF recommends referral for investigation if candidal infection fails to respond to 2 weeks of antifungal treatment [BNF, 2022]. Other referral criteria are based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice. 
  • Expert opinion in review articles [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Lu, 2021] and the BNF [BNF, 2022] is that biopsies are indicated in people with hyperplastic candidiasis, due to the increased risk of malignancy.
Treatments not recommended 
  • Topical antifungals are not recommended for anything other than a mild infection, because evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests they are not as effective as systemic drugs for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection [Pienaar et al, 2010].
  • Miconazole mucoadhesive buccal tablets are licensed for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised people . However, they are considerably more expensive than miconazole oral gel and are not currently recommended by the Scottish Medicines Consortium [Scottish Medicines Consortium, 2011]. For these reasons, CKS does not recommend its use in primary care.
  • Oral itraconazole should be reserved for cases of fluconazole-resistant candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019; Xiao, 2022]. Specialist advice should be obtained before initiating itraconazole therapy because of the increased risk of drug interactions and adverse effects.
  • Oral ketoconazole should no longer be prescribed for the treatment of fungal infections as the risk of liver damage outweighs the benefits. For this reason, the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has suspended its marketing authorisation [MHRA, 2013]. See the MHRA website for more information.
  • Oral amphotericin is not recommended as there is a lack of trial evidence of efficacy in the treatment of oral candidiasis. It is sometimes used as an adjunct to other systemic antimycotic drugs [Hughes, 2020; Lu, 2021].

Prescribing information

Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Miconazole oral gel

What are the licensed doses?

  • Miconazole oral gel (24 mg/mL) is indicated for the treatment of fungal infections of the oropharynx and gastrointestinal tract (unlicensed for use in a child aged younger than 4 months, or 5–6 months for an infant born pre-term).
  • The licensed doses for oral candidiasis are:
    • Children aged 4–24 months — 1.25 mL (1/4 measuring spoon) of gel applied four times a day after meals. 
      • Each dose should be divided into smaller portions, and the gel should be applied to the affected area(s) with a clean finger.
      • The gel should not be applied to the back of the throat due to possible choking. 
    • Adults and children 2 years of age and older — 2.5 mL (1/2 measuring spoon) of gel applied four times a day after meals.
  • Also advise that:
    • The gel should not be swallowed immediately but kept in the mouth as long as possible.
    • The treatment should be continued for at least 7 days after the symptoms have disappeared.
    • Dental prostheses should be removed at night and brushed with the gel.

[ABPI, 2015; BNF, 2022]

What are the contraindications and cautions?

  • Do not prescribe miconazole oral gel to:
    • Children whose swallowing reflex is not yet sufficiently developed.
    • People with liver dysfunction.
  • Prescribe miconazole oral gel with caution to:
    • Children aged under 4 months (or younger than 5–6 months for pre-term children) — this is an unlicensed indication.
    • Children aged 4 months – 2 years.
      • Take into consideration the variability of the maturation of the swallowing function in infants, especially when giving miconazole gel to infants aged 4–6 months.
      • Advise parents and/or carers that the gel should not be applied to the back of the throat; that each dose should be divided into smaller portions and applied into the mouth with a clean finger; and to observe the child for possible choking.
    • Pregnant women.
      • The manufacturer advises that miconazole oral gel should be avoided in pregnant women if possible. The potential hazards should be balanced against the possible benefits. In animal studies, miconazole has shown no teratogenic effects but is foetotoxic at high oral doses.
    • Breastfeeding women.
      • The manufacturer advises that caution should be exercised when miconazole oral gel is prescribed for a breastfeeding woman, as it is not known whether it is excreted in human milk.
      • Advise that, due to the risk of choking, the gel must not be applied to the nipple for administration to an infant.

[ABPI, 2015; BNF, 2022]

What are the possible adverse effects?

  • Common adverse effects of miconazole oral gel include dry mouth, nausea, oral discomfort, vomiting, and regurgitation.
  • Other adverse effects include:
    • Uncommon — dysgeusia.
    • Frequencies unknown — anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity, choking, diarrhoea, stomatitis, tongue discolouration, hepatitis, angio-oedema, urticaria, rash, acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.
  • Serious skin reactions (such as toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) have also been reported.
    • Inform the person about the signs of serious skin reactions, and advise that they should discontinue treatment and seek specialist advice at the first appearance of a skin rash.

[ABPI, 2015; BNF, 2022]

What drug interactions are associated with miconazole oral gel?

  • Miconazole can inhibit the metabolism of drugs metabolized by the CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 enzyme systems, resulting in an increase and/or prolongation of their effects, including adverse effects.
    • Concurrent treatment with miconazole oral gel and the following drugs is contraindicated [ABPI, 2015; BNF, 2022]:
      • Drugs known to prolong the QT-interval, for example mizolastine and pimozide.
      • Ergotamine — increased risk of ergotism when imidazoles are given with ergotamine.
      • Simvastatin — possible increased risk of myopathy when miconazole is given with simvastatin.
      • Quetiapine. 
      • Triazolam and oral midazolam.
      • Warfarin. The manufacturer's summary of products characteristics details the interaction with warfarin which has been updated to state that patients should not use if they are taking warfarin. Concomitant use can substantially increase INR, and fatal outcomes (due to bleeding) have been reported. See the SPC here. 
    • Concurrent treatment with miconazole oral gel and the following drugs should be done with caution or avoided if possible (concurrent use should be monitored; dose adjustments may be indicated) [ABPI, 2015; BNF, 2022]:
      • Carbamazepine — miconazole possibly increases plasma concentration of carbamazepine.
      • Certain calcium channel blockers (such as dihydropyridines and verapamil).
      • Ciclosporin — miconazole possibly inhibits metabolism of ciclosporin (increased plasma concentration).
      • HIV Protease Inhibitors (such as saquinavir).
      • Phenytoin and fosphenytoin — miconazole enhances anticonvulsant effect of these drugs, leading to an increased plasma concentration.
      • Reboxetine — avoidance of imidazoles is advised by the manufacturer of reboxetine.
      • Sulfonylureas — miconazole enhances the hypoglycaemic effect of sulphonylureas (such as gliclazide and glipizide). If concurrent treatment is necessary, advise the person to seek medical advice if they have symptoms of hypoglycaemia (for example nervousness, sweating, and/or trembling) during concurrent treatment.
      • Tacrolimus and sirolimus — miconazole oral gel possibly increases plasma concentration of tacrolimus, and increases plasma concentration of sirolimus.
  • For a complete list of possible drug interactions of miconazole oral gel, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).

Nystatin suspension

What are the licensed doses?

  • Nystatin suspension (100,000 units/mL) is indicated for the prevention and treatment of candidal infections of the oral cavity, oesophagus, and intestinal tract.
  • The licensed dose for oral candidiasis is 1ml (100,000 units) dropped into the mouth four times a day, usually for 7 days.
  • Advise that:
    • Nystatin should be taken after food or drink.
    • The suspension should be kept in contact with the affected areas for as long as possible.
    • The treatment should be continued for 48 hours after lesions have resolved.

[ABPI, 2017; BNF, 2022]

What are the contraindications and cautions?

  • Do not prescribe nystatin suspension to:
    • People with rare hereditary problems of fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption, or sucrase-isomaltase insufficiency — nystatin suspension contains sucrose.
  • Prescribe nystatin suspension with caution to:
    • People on a controlled sodium diet — nystatin suspension contains 0.3 mmol (or 1.3 mg) sodium per 1 mL dose.
    • People with diabetes mellitus — nystatin suspension contains sucrose.
    • Pregnant women.
      • Absorption of nystatin from the gastrointestinal tract is negligible. However, the manufacturer advises that it should be prescribed during pregnancy only if the potential benefits to be derived outweigh the possible risks involved, as it is not known whether nystatin can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproductive capacity [ABPI, 2017].
      • Breastfeeding women. The manufacturer advises that caution should be exercised when nystatin is prescribed for a breastfeeding woman, as it is not known whether nystatin is excreted in human milk.

[ABPI, 2017; BNF, 2022]

What are the adverse effects?

  • Nystatin is generally well tolerated by all age groups, even during prolonged use. However:
    • Nausea has been reported occasionally during treatment. 
    • Large oral doses of nystatin have occasionally produced diarrhoea, gastrointestinal distress, nausea, and vomiting.
    • Rash, including urticaria, has been reported rarely. Steven-Johnson Syndrome has been reported very rarely.
    • Hypersensitivity and angio-oedema, including facial oedema, have been reported.
  • If irritation or sensitization develops, treatment should be discontinued.

[ABPI, 2017; BNF, 2022]

What drug interactions are associated with nystatin suspension?

  • There are no known drug interactions with nystatin suspension.

[ABPI, 2017; BNF, 2022]

Fluconazole - oral

What are the contraindications and cautions for oral fluconazole?

  • Do not prescribe:
    • Oral fluconazole to:
      • People with acute porphyria.
      • Pregnant women.
        • The manufacturer recommends a washout period of approximately 1 week (corresponding to 5-6 half-lives) after a single-dose or discontinuation of a course of treatment for women before they become pregnant.
      • People taking certain drugs.
    • High or repeated doses of oral fluconazole to:
      • Breastfeeding women.
  • Prescribe oral fluconazole with caution to people:
    • At risk of QT interval prolongation — this includes people with cardiomyopathy, sinus bradycardia, arrhythmias, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia, and those taking other drugs known to cause QT interval prolongation (such as tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiarrhythmics).
    • With hepatic impairment or taking concurrent hepatotoxic drugs, due to the risk of hepatic necrosis — discontinue treatment if signs or symptoms of hepatic disease develop (such as severe abdominal pain, jaundice, or weakness). 
    • With renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 50 mL/min/1.73m2) — use the usual initial dose then halve any subsequent doses.
    • Who are taking certain drugs.

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2022]

What adverse effects are associated with oral fluconazole?

  • Adverse effects of oral fluconazole include:
    • Common or very common
      • Abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea, nausea, and flatulence.
      • Headache.
      • Rash — discontinue treatment if the infection becomes invasive or systemic.
    • Uncommon
      • Alopecia.
      • Adrenal insufficiency.
      • Dizziness.
      • Vomiting, dyspepsia, and taste disturbance.
      • Hepatic disorders.
      • Hyperlipidaemia.
      • Seizures.
      • Pruritus, anaphylaxis, angioedema (in children), hypersensitivity reactions (in adults), Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
    • Frequency unknown
      • Hypokalaemia.
      • Leucopenia and thrombocytopenia.
  • Severe cutaneous reactions are more likely in people with AIDS.

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2022]

What drug interactions are associated with oral fluconazole?

  • Fluconazole inhibits the metabolism of drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C9 (potently), CYP3A4 (moderately), and CYP2C19. This may result in a higher and/or prolonged action of these drugs, including adverse effects. The enzyme-inhibiting effect of fluconazole persists 4–5 days after discontinuation of fluconazole treatment due to the long half-life of fluconazole. 
    • The following drugs are contraindicated (or should be avoided) during treatment with fluconazole:
      • Ergotamine — there is an increased risk of ergotism.
      • Erythromycin — concurrent use with fluconazole has the potential to increase the risk of cardiotoxicity (prolonged QT interval and Torsades de Pointes) and consequently sudden heart death.
      • Pimozide — concurrent use with fluconazole may lead to QT prolongation and rare occurrences of Torsade de Pointes.
      • Quetiapine.
      • Reboxetine.
    • Concurrent treatment with fluconazole and the following drugs should be done with caution (concurrent use should be monitored; dose adjustments may be indicated):
      • Aminophylline and theophylline.
      • Avanafil.
      • Ciclosporin.
      • Coumarins, such as warfarin. 
      • Diazepam (risk of prolonged sedation).
      • Fentanyl.
      • Midazolam (risk of prolonged sedation).
      • Phenytoin.
      • Rifabutin (increased risk of uveitis).
      • Statins — the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis increases when fluconazole is given with statins metabolized through CYP3A4 (atorvastatin and simvastatin) or through CYP2C9 (fluvastatin). If concurrent treatment is necessary, monitor for symptoms of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, and monitor creatine kinase. Discontinue the statin if a marked increase in creatine kinase is observed or if myopathy/rhabdomyolysis is diagnosed or suspected.
      • Sulfonylureas (such as gliclazide and glipizide) — if concurrent use is indicated, advise the person to seek medical advice if they have symptoms of hypoglycaemia (for example nervousness, sweating, and/or trembling).
      • Tacrolimus and sirolimus.
      • Tretinoin — fluconazole possibly increases the risk of tretinoin toxicity.
      • Zidovudine — fluconazole increases the risk of zidovudine toxicity. 
  • Other possible drug interactions of fluconazole include:
    • Clopidogrel — fluconazole possibly reduces the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.
    • Hydrochlorothiazide — the plasma levels of fluconazole may be increased by 40%; however, no adjustment in dosage of fluconazole is required. 
    • Rifampicin — metabolism of fluconazole may be accelerated by rifampicin, leading to reduced plasma concentrations.
  • For a complete list of possible drug interactions of fluconazole, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).

[EMC, 2023; BNF, 2022]

Supporting evidence

This CKS topic is largely based on expert opinion in Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update of the Infectious diseases society of America [Pappas, 2016], the British National Formulary [BNF, 2022], and several review articles Oral lesions/and other dermatological conditions of the mouth published by the Primary Care Dermatology Society (PCDS) [Primary Care Dermatology Society, 2017], BMJ Best Practice - Oral candidiasis [BMJ Best Practice, 2019], the British HIV Association (BHIVA) Guidelines for the management of opportunistic infection in people living with HIV; the clinical management of candidiasis [BHIVA, 2019] and Oral candidiasis: causes, types and treatment [Hughes, 2020] and on expert opinion in review article Oral candidosis: pathophysiology and best practice for diagnosis, classification and successful management [Lu, 2021]. 

How this topic was developed

This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of oral candida.

Search dates

April 2017 - March 2022

Key search terms

Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.

  • exp Candidiasis, Oral/ (mucosal adj candida).tw.
  • (candida OR candidal OR candidiasis OR candidoses OR candidiases OR candidosis OR moniliasis OR moniliases OR thrush).tw AND (oral or oropharyngeal or oro-pharyngeal or oropharynx or mouth).tw

Sources of guidelines

Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Systematic reviews
    • Protocols
    • Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • Medline (with systematic review filter)
  • EMBASE (with systematic review filter)

Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals

Sources of randomized controlled trials

  • The Cochrane Library:
    • Central Register of Controlled Trials
  • Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
  • EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)

Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries

Sources of national policy

Patient experiences

Sources of medicines information

The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.

Stakeholder engagement

Our policy

The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:

  • Clinical accuracy.
  • Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
  • Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
  • Usability.

Principles of the consultation process

  • The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
  • To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
  • Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
  • Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
  • External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
  • Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
  • All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
  • All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.

Stakeholders

  • Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
  • Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
    • Experts in the topic area.
    • Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
    • Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
    • Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
    • The British National Formulary team.
    • The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
  • Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.

Patient engagement

Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:

  • Topic selection
  • Scoping of topic
  • Selection of clinical scenarios
  • First draft internal review
  • Second draft internal review
  • External review
  • Final draft and pre-publication

Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.

Evidence exclusion criteria

Our policy

Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.

Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.

Standard exclusions for scoping literature:

  • Animal studies
  • Original research is not written in English

Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:

  • Sample size too small or study underpowered
  • Bias evident or promotional literature
  • Population not relevant
  • Intervention/treatment not relevant
  • Outcomes not relevant
  • Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
  • Setting not relevant
  • Not relevant to UK
  • Incorrect study type
  • Review article
  • Duplicate reference

Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers

Our policy

The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.

  • Feasibility
    • Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
  • Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
  • Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
    • Eligible population
    • Current interventions
    • Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
    • Cost of the current or new intervention mix
    • Impact on other costs
    • Condition-related costs
    • In-direct costs and service impacts
    • Time dependencies
  • Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available. 

We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.

Declarations of interest

Our policy

Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:

  • Personal financial interests
  • Personal family interest
  • Personal non-financial interest
  • Non-personal financial gain or benefit

Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.

Who should declare competing interests?

Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.

Competing interests declared for this topic:

None.

References

  • ABPI (2015) SPC for Daktarin oral gel. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
  • ABPI (2017) SPC for Nystatin Oral Suspension BP. Electronic Medicines Compendium. http://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • British HIV Association (2019) British HIV Association/British Infection Association guidelines on the management of opportunistic infection in people living with HIV: The clinical management of candidiasis 2019. http://www.bhiva.org/file/5d669fd3e79d5/OI-guidelines-candidiasis.pdf
  • BMJ Best Practice (2019) Oral candidiasis. BMJ Best Practice. BMJ Publishing. https://bestpractice.bmj.com [Free Full-text]
  • British National Formulary for Children (2022) British National Formulary for Children. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
  • BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • BNF (2025) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
  • Carvalho, C. G. and Medeiros-Filho, J. B. and Ferreira, M. C. (2018) Guide for health professionals addressing oral care for individuals in oncological treatment based on scientific evidence. Support Care Cancer 26(8), 2651-2661. [Free Full-text]
  • CDC (2017) Invasive candidiasis statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov [Free Full-text]
  • EMC (2016) SPC for Azocan-P Capsules 150mg. http://www.medicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Garcia-Cuesta, C., Sarrion-Pérez, M-G. and V. Bagán,  J. (2014) Current treatment of oral candidiasis: A literature review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 6(5). [Free Full-text]
  • González-Serrano, J.,  Serrano, J.,  López-Pintor, R.M. et al. (2016) Prevalence of Oral Mucosal Disorders in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Compared with a Control Group. Journal Of Diabetes Research, 5048967. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Hoppe,J.E. and Hahn,H. (1996) Randomized comparison of two nystatin oral gels with miconazole oral gel for treatment of oral thrush in infants. Antimycotics Study Group. Infection. 24(2), 136-139. [Abstract]
  • Hoppe,J.E. (1997) Treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompetent infants: a randomized multicenter study of miconazole gel vs. nystatin suspension. The Antifungals Study Group. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 16(3), 288-293. [Abstract]
  • Hughes, S. (2020) Oral candidiasis: types and treatment. The Pharmaceutical Journal. EPub. [Free Full-text]
  • Lewis M. A. O.Williams, D. W. (2017) Diagnosis and managment of oral candidosis. British Dental Journal 223(9), 675-681. [Free Full-text]
  • Lu, S.-Y. (2021) Oral Candidosis: Pathophysiology and Best Practice for Diagnosis, Classification, and Successful Management. Journal of Fungi 7, 555. [Free Full-text]
  • Lyu, X., Zhao, C. and Yan, Z. M. and Hua, H. 10: 1161-1171 (2016) Efficacy of nystatin for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 10, 1161-1171. [Free Full-text]
  • Mallya, S. M. and Mallya, S. (2019) Candida and Oral Candidosis—A Review. Journal of Health Allied Science. Thieme open access. [Free Full-text]
  • Martorano-Fernandes, L., Dornelas-Figueira, L. M., Marcello-Machado, R. M., et al. (2020) Oral candidiasis and denture stomatitis in diabetic patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pesquisa Odontologica Brasileira (Brazilian Oral Research) 34, e113. [Free Full-text]
  • Martonffy, A.I. (2015) Oral health: dentures and dental implants. FP Essentials 428, 27-32. [Abstract]
  • MHRA (2013) Oral ketoconazole: do not prescribe or use for fungal infections — risk of liver injury outweighs benefits. Drug Safety Update 7(1), S1.
  • Mun, M.,  Yap, T.,  Alnuaimi, A.D. et al. (2016) Oral candidal carriage in asymptomatic patients. Australian Dental Journal 61(2), 190-195. [Abstract]
  • Pankhurst, C.L. (2013) Candidiasis (oropharyngeal). BMJ Clinical Evidence. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com
  • Pappas, P.G., Kauffman, C.A. and Andes, D. et al. (2016) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 62(4). [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
  • Patil, S., Rao, R.S., Majumdar, B. and Anil, S. (2015) Clinical appearance of oral candida infection and therapeutic strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology 6, 1391.
  • Public Health England (2021) Laboratory surveillance of candidaemia in England: 2020. Health Protection Report Volume 15 Number 15 14 September 2021. GOV.UK. [Free Full-text]
  • Pienaar,E.,D., Young,T. and Holmes,H. (2010) Interventions for the prevention and management of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection in adults and children (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Primary Care Dermatology Society (2016) Candidal infection (syn. candidiasis; candidosis; moniliasis). Primary Care Dermatology Society. http://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Primary Care Dermatology Society (2017) Oral lesions / and other dermatological conditions of the mouth. Primary Care Dermatology Society. http://www.pcds.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Rafat, Z., Sasani, E., Salimi, Y., et al. (2021) The Prevalence, Etiological Agents, Clinical Features, Treatment, and Diagnosis of HIV-Associated Oral Candidiasis in Pediatrics Across the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pediatr 9. [Free Full-text]
  • Scottish Medicines Consortium (2011) Miconazole (Loramyc) (resubmission). Scottish Medicines Consortium.. www.scottishmedicines.org.uk [Free Full-text]
  • Specialist Pharmacy Service (2021) Using miconazole oral gel to treat oral thrush in adults taking a statin. Specialist Pharmacy Service. NHS. [Free Full-text]
  • Su, C.W., Gaskie, S., Jamieson, B. and Triezenberg, D. (2008) What is the best treatment for oral thrush in healthy infants? Journal of Family Practice 57(7), 484-485.
  • Vila, T., Sultan, A. S. and Montelongo-Jauregui, D. and Jabra-Rizk, M. A. (2020) Oral Candidiasis: A Disease of Opportunity. J Fungi (Basel) 6(1). [Free Full-text]
  • WHO (2014) Guidelines on the treatment of skin and oral HIV-associated conditions in children and adults. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int [Free Full-text]
  • Worthington,H.V., Clarkson,J.E., Khalid,T., et al. (2010) Interventions for treating oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. www.thecochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
  • Xiao, J., Huang, X., Alkhers, N., et al. (2018) Candida albicans and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Caries Res 52(1-2), 102-112. [Free Full-text]
  • Xiao, Y., Yuan, P., Sun, Y., et al. (2022) Comparison of topical antifungal agents for oral candidiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  282-291. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 133(3), 282-291. [Free Full-text]
  • Zhang, L.W.,  Fu, J.Y.,  Hua, H. et al. (2016) Efficacy and safety of miconazole for oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Diseases 22(3), 185-195. [Abstract]
Change privacy settings