Respiratory
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
Last revised in November 2025
Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is the coexistence of excessive daytime sleepiness with irregular breathing at night.
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: Summary
- Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of complete or partial obstruction of the upper airway during sleep, causing apnoea (complete airflow obstruction with temporary absence or cessation of breathing) or hypopnoea (decreased airflow), respectively.
- This is usually associated with symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness, irregular breathing at night, and cycles of transient arousal from sleep to restore normal airway muscle tone and airflow.
- It occurs due to excessive collapsing forces around the pharynx that exceed the decreased muscle tone during sleep.
- Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is a diagnosis following sleep studies that causes symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness.
- OSAS can affect all age groups, with an increasing prevalence with age and obesity.
- Risk factors include increasing age, male sex, obesity, family history of OSAS, nasopharyngeal obstruction, craniofacial abnormalities, neuromuscular disorders, and lifestyle factors (such as smoking, alcohol, and sleeping supine).
- OSAS may be associated with cardiometabolic conditions, depression, and increased risk of work-related injuries and road traffic collisions in adults. It may be associated with behavioural problems, reduced concentration, reduced school performance, and faltering growth in children.
- A diagnosis of OSAS should be suspected if there is a history of:
- Excessive daytime sleepiness, snoring, fatigue, witnessed episodes of apnoea while sleeping, unrefreshing sleep, and impaired concentration in adults.
- Witnessed snoring and apnoeas, arousals from sleep, laboured breathing, nocturnal enuresis, mouth breathing, behavioural problems, and reduced school performance in children.
- Assessment of a person with suspected OSAS should include:
- Asking about the duration and severity of symptoms; symptoms during high-risk activities such as driving; the impact of symptoms on quality of life; risk factors and associated conditions.
- Examining for signs of nasopharyngeal obstruction; jaw or craniofacial abnormalities; and checking blood pressure, body mass index, and neck circumference.
- Considering the use of a screening questionnaire to assess the extent and severity of symptoms.
- An adult with suspected OSAS should be referred to a sleep clinic:
- Urgently if symptoms such as excessive sleepiness are impacting on their role as a professional driver or safety-critical worker; or if OSAS can worsen the prognosis of a comorbid cardiopulmonary condition, if the person is pregnant, undergoing pre-operative assessment for major surgery, has non-arteric anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, a learning difficulty, or autism.
- Routinely if symptoms are moderate or severe; or symptoms are mild but impacting on quality of life.
- A child with suspected OSAS should be referred to:
- A paediatric ears, nose, and throat specialist if there is nasopharyngeal obstruction and snoring at night.
- A paediatrician if there is a congenital or developmental disorder, associated condition, or obesity contributing to symptoms.
- Management of confirmed OSAS in primary care includes:
- Providing advice on sources of information and support.
- Providing advice on lifestyle measures, such as weight loss, exercise, stopping smoking, reducing alcohol, and avoiding sleeping supine.
- Encouraging adherence to specialist treatments such as continuous positive airway pressure therapy and/or intra-oral devices.
- Monitoring for and managing any associated conditions.
- Providing advice on driving and when to notify the Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency.
- Providing advice about the risk of occupational injury and when the person should notify their employer.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 12 months onwards.
This CKS topic covers the assessment, referral, and management in primary care of adults and children with suspected and confirmed obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS).
This CKS topic does not cover in detail the use of sleep studies for diagnosis or the specialist management of OSAS in adults or children.
There are separate CKS topics on Insomnia and Tiredness/fatigue in adults.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
November 2025 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2025 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of the topic. There have been minor structural changes to the topic, aligning the recommendations with current evidence, and minor changes to the recommendations, including to urgently refer anyone with a learning disability or autism and suspected OSAS to a sleep clinic and to provide advice about the risk of occupational injury.
Previous changes
November 2021 — minor update. Broken link updated.
August 2021 — minor update. New information from the NICE Guideline [NG202] Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s has been incorporated. New information added on not using the Epworth sleepiness scale solely for referral and new criteria for urgent referral to specialist care.
February to March 2021 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in January 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The recommendations have been updated in line with current evidence in the literature. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
April 2015 — minor update. Information added to reflect the advice published in the OSA Partnership Group 2015 publication Four-Week Wait Campaign: For the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS).
October 2014 to January 2015 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in October 2014 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone minor restructuring, and background information regarding sleep apnoea in children has been added. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
July 2013 — minor update. Links to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) website have been updated.
October 2010 — minor update. Information on fitness to drive from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) guidance for medical practitioners, At a glance guide to the current medical standards of fitness to drive has been added. Issued in October 2010.
September 2008 to January 2009 — this is a new CKS topic. The evidence-base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 October 2025.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 October 2025.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 October 2025.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 October 2025.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 October 2025.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 October 2025.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 October 2025.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 October 2025.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Be aware of when to suspect obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS).
- Make a detailed assessment of a person with suspected OSAS.
- Offer referral for people with suspected OSAS to a specialist for diagnosis and treatment.
- Provide advice on driving and safety-critical work for people with suspected or confirmed OSAS.
- Provide appropriate self-care advice to people with confirmed OSAS.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.
Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.
QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.
QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.
NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.
Background information
What is it?
- Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of complete or partial obstruction of the upper airway during sleep, causing apnoea (complete airflow obstruction with temporary absence or cessation of breathing) or hypopnoea (decreased airflow), respectively [Semelka, 2016; NICE, 2021; Arachchige, 2022].
- This is usually associated with symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness and transient arousal from sleep to restore normal airway muscle tone and airflow. These cycles of irregular breathing and transient arousal can occur many times throughout the night.
- OSAHS occurs due to excessive collapsing forces around the pharynx that exceed the decreased muscle tone during sleep.
- Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea (OSAH) is used to describe people with irregular breathing at night, but without daytime sleepiness. OSAH is more common than OSAHS, but is less likely to be seen in primary care.
- The British Thoracic Society (BTS) defines [BTS, 2018]:
- Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a diagnosis following sleep studies that may or may not be causing symptoms.
- Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is a diagnosis following sleep studies that is causing symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness. This CKS topic will use the term obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome when referring to OSAHS.
- Central sleep apnoea (CSA) can produce similar symptoms to those seen in people with OSAS, but CSA is distinguishable by a reduction in breathing effort [Badr, 2025].
- In CSA, this occurs due to instability in central respiratory regulation, whereas in OSAS, the reduction in airflow results from upper airway obstruction.
- Differentiating CSA from OSAS is not generally feasible in primary care, as diagnosis requires specialist polysomnography investigations in a sleep clinic setting to assess respiratory effort (for example, using oesophageal pressure monitoring).
How common is it?
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) can affect all age groups, with an increasing prevalence with age and obesity [Semelka, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020; Akashiba, 2022].
- Up to 4% of middle-aged men and 2% of middle-aged women in the UK are estimated to have OSAS [NICE, 2021]; although the true prevalence is likely higher as underdiagnosis may reach 85% [Arachchige, 2022].
- A large Swiss population-based cross-sectional cohort study (n = 3043) found the prevalence of moderate-to-severe OSAS confirmed by sleep studies was 23.4% in women and 49.7% in men [Heinzer, 2015].
- Expert opinion also notes that the condition is approximately twice as common in men as in women [Gottlieb, 2020; Akashiba, 2022].
- In children, the estimated prevalence is between 1–4% [Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
- An Italian cross-sectional cohort study (n = 1207 children, mean age 7.3 years) found the overall prevalence of OSAS in children was 1.8% [Brunetti, 2001].
- Expert opinion in review articles notes a peak incidence between about 2–8 years of age due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy in children, with equal prevalence in boys and girls [Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
- A second peak in prevalence may exist for adolescents, thought to be related to the maturation of the adult body habitus and craniofacial structure, as well as the increasing prevalence of obesity among adolescents [Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
What are the risk factors?
Risk factors for developing obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) include:
- Adults [Kotagal, 2006; Greenstone, 2014; Semelka, 2016; Stradling, 2016; Randerath, 2018; Gottlieb, 2020; NICE, 2025; Wang, 2025]
- Increasing age.
- Male sex (the male-to-female ratio is between 2:1 and 3:1).
- Obesity or overweight.
- Treatment-resistant hypertension.
- Neck circumference greater than 40.6 cm.
- Family history of OSAS.
- Smoking.
- Alcohol.
- Sleeping supine.
- Hypothyroidism.
- Adenotonsillar hypertrophy, macroglossia (enlarged tongue).
- Craniofacial abnormalities, including retrognathia (abnormal jaw positioning with mandible set back from the maxilla); acromegaly; narrow oropharyngeal opening; and macroglossia.
- Type 2 diabetes.
- Down's syndrome.
- Acromegaly.
- Polycystic ovary syndrome.
- Chronic heart failure.
- Moderate or severe asthma.
- Stroke or transient ischaemic attack.
- Cardiac arrhythmia, particularly atrial fibrillation.
- Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.
- Post-menopausal females (surgical menopause may be associated with a higher risk than natural menopause).
- Children [Stradling, 2016; Savini, 2019; Gottlieb, 2020; Gileles-Hillel, 2024]
- Adenotonsillar hypertrophy.
- Obesity.
- Craniofacial abnormalities such as retrognathia (abnormal jaw positioning with mandible set back from the maxilla); micrognathia (undersized lower jaw); cleft palate; and macroglossia.
- Neuromuscular disease such as cerebral palsy (decreased tone in upper airway).
- Other (such as Down's syndrome due to both anatomical abnormalities and decreased muscle tone; achondroplasia; Prader-Willi syndrome; sickle-cell disease; and cerebral palsy).
What are the associated conditions?
Opinion is divided as to whether obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is causally linked to comorbid cardiometabolic conditions, due to the presence of confounding factors such as obesity and hypertension [Semelka, 2016; Randerath, 2018; Bonsignore, 2019]. The following conditions may be associated with OSAS:
- Adults [Semelka, 2016; Stradling, 2016; Harrison, 2017; Randerath, 2018; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022; Akashiba, 2022]:
- Hypertension — including non-dipping nocturnal blood pressure. See the CKS topic on Hypertension - not diabetic for more information.
- Stroke — a meta-analysis of five prospective studies (n = 8435) found that OSAS increased the risk of stroke (odds ratio 2.24), and this effect was independent of other cerebrovascular risk factors [Loke, 2012]. Similarly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 studies found that untreated severe OSAS doubles the risk for incident stroke, particularly in young and middle-aged people [Xie, 2014]. Severe OSAS is also a risk factor for recurrent stroke and may be associated with stroke mortality [Bassetti, 2020]. See the CKS topic on Stroke and TIA for more information.
- Cardiovascular disease and cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation. See the CKS topics on Angina and Atrial fibrillation for more information.
- Heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. See the CKS topic on Heart failure - chronic for more information.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus. See the CKS topic on Diabetes - type 2 for more information.
- Depression. See the CKS topic on Depression for more information.
- Work-related injuries and road traffic collisions (RTCs) — OSAS may cause excessive sleepiness and reduced vigilance, leading to impaired psychomotor performance. A systematic review of 16 studies found people with OSAS have an average 2.5-fold increased risk for RTCs compared with healthy controls (mean crash ratio of 1.21–4.89) [Tregear, 2009]. In addition, a meta-analysis of seven studies found the risk of workplace accidents was double in workers with OSAS compared with controls (odds ratio 2.18), and occupational driving was associated with a higher effect size [Garbarino, 2016].
- Children [Alsubie, 2017; Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019]:
- Behavioural problems, irritability, reduced concentration, and reduced school performance.
- Faltering growth (in severe cases). See the CKS topic on Faltering growth for more information.
What is the prognosis?
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) usually improves associated symptoms, and the degree of symptom improvement is associated with adherence to therapy [Gottlieb, 2020; Akashiba, 2022].
- In adults:
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment may cause small reductions in daytime and nocturnal blood pressure readings [Akashiba, 2022], particularly in people with severe OSAS [NICE, 2021].
- Expert opinion in a review article notes that CPAP may reduce blood pressure and rates of arrhythmia and stroke, improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in people with heart failure, and reduce fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. The review article cites meta-analyses that similar rates of blood pressure lowering were seen with CPAP and mandibular advancement devices [Semelka, 2016].
- Meta-analyses have also demonstrated statistically significant greater reductions in daytime sleepiness with CPAP (compared with placebo or usual care), improvements in the Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and in minimum oxygen saturation during sleep in favour of CPAP (compared with dental devices) and considerable reductions in the rate of road traffic accidents with CPAP [NICE, 2021].
- In children:
- In the majority of cases of uncomplicated OSAS, treatment with adenotonsillectomy resolves symptoms [Harrison, 2017; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
When should I suspect a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome?
- Suspect a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) in an adult with:
- Excessive daytime sleepiness, tiredness, fatigue, or unrefreshing sleep.
- Snoring, witnessed breathing pauses (episodes of apnoea), gasping, or choking while sleeping.
- Cognitive dysfunction, memory impairment or impaired concentration.
- Consider a diagnosis of OSAS in an adult with:
- Unexplained morning headache (typically resolves within hours of waking).
- Frequent nocturnal awakenings.
- Unexplained nocturia.
- Nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
- Associated conditions or risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, cardiac arrhythmia, or stroke disease.
- Suspect a diagnosis of OSAS in a child with:
- Witnessed snoring and breathing pauses while sleeping (apnoeas), which may be followed by a gasp or snort.
- Restlessness and sudden arousals from sleep, laboured breathing, unusual sleep posture (for example, with neck hyperextended).
- Nocturnal enuresis (due to decreased appropriate arousals during sleep).
- Daytime symptoms such as behavioural problems, irritability, hyperactivity, reduced concentration, reduced school performance, and mouth breathing.
- Daytime tiredness and sleepiness, faltering growth (rare).
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on when to suspect obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s [NICE, 2025], the NICE technology appraisal guidance Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome [NICE, 2021], the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline for diagnosing and monitoring paediatric sleep-disordered breathing [Evans, 2023], the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS in adults [Semelka, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022], and OSAS in children [Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
When to suspect OSAS in adults
- The recommendation on when to suspect OSAS in adults is based on the NICE guideline Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s, which advises that adults should be assessed for OSAHS when they have two or more of the following: snoring; witnessed apnoeas; unrefreshed sleep; waking headaches; unexplained excessive sleepiness, tiredness or fatigue; nocturia; choking during sleep; sleep fragmentation or insomnia; or cognitive dysfunction or memory impairment [NICE, 2025].
- Recommendations in the NICE guideline are supported by the ERS/ESRS working group report [Randerath, 2018], and expert opinion from review articles [Semelka, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022].
Presentation of OSAS in children
- Possible features of OSAS in children are discussed in the BTS guideline [Evans, 2023] and in expert opinion review articles [Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
- It is estimated that OSAS can present with behavioural problems, reduced concentration, hyperactivity, or irritability in up to 25% of children [Harrison, 2017].
- The most common anatomical aspects associated with increased risk of OSAS include enlarged adenoids and tonsils in younger children, and an elevated body mass index (BMI) in older children and adolescents [Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
How should I assess a person with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome?
If a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is suspected:
- Ask about:
- The duration and severity of symptoms, such as snoring, gasping during sleep (apnoeas), and excessive daytime sleepiness, including during high-risk activities such as driving.
- A collateral history from a partner regarding snoring habits, apnoeas, and choking episodes during sleep is helpful, where possible.
- The impact of symptoms on quality of life, including relationships, mood, sleep (including partner's sleep quality), and social activities. In children, the impact of symptoms on school performance, concentration, behaviour, and growth.
- Any impact of symptoms on driving and work-related safety, including distances driven; any episodes of driving while sleepy; any road traffic collisions or near-misses that could be due to sleepiness, fatigue, or inattention.
- Any risk factors for OSAS.
- Any associated conditions.
- Any clinical features suggesting an alternative diagnosis.
- The duration and severity of symptoms, such as snoring, gasping during sleep (apnoeas), and excessive daytime sleepiness, including during high-risk activities such as driving.
- Examine the person for:
- Jaw abnormalities such as micrognathia (small jaw) or retrognathia (abnormal jaw positioning with mandible set back from the maxilla).
- Signs of nasopharyngeal obstruction such as mouth breathing or nasal speech (for example, due to adenotonsillar enlargement, nasal polyps, or a deviated nasal septum).
- Signs of thyroid enlargement (goitre).
- Signs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, or pulmonary hypertension (may influence the urgency of referral). See the section on Referral for more information.
- Blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), and neck circumference (collar size) in adults.
- In adults, consider using a screening questionnaire to assess the extent and severity of symptoms. Options include:
- STOP-Bang questionnaire.
- An eight-item tool that assesses snoring, sleepiness, apnoeas, hypertension, obesity, neck circumference, age, and sex.
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
- A self-administered eight-item tool assesses the likelihood of daytime sleepiness in a variety of common situations.
- Note: Do not use the Epworth Sleepiness Scale alone to determine if referral is needed, because not all people with OSAS have excessive sleepiness.
- STOP-Bang questionnaire.
- In children, consider using a screening questionnaire to determine the extent and severity of symptoms.
- The Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (SRBD-PSQ) is a 22 point tool that assesses snoring, apnoeas, sleepiness and behaviour.
- A negative screening questionnaire result should not rule out consideration for further assessment. See the section on Referral for more information.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on assessment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s [NICE, 2025], the NICE technology appraisal guidance Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome [NICE, 2021], the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], the Association for Respiratory Technology and Physiology (ARTP) guideline ARTP standards of care - sleep apnoea services (diagnostics) [ARTP, 2019], the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline for diagnosing and monitoring paediatric sleep-disordered breathing [Evans, 2023], the BTS position statement Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018 [BTS, 2018], the Japanese Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], a systematic review of screening questionnaires for OSAS [Amra, 2018], a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from up to 7 studies which assessed the accuracy of the Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire for the diagnosis of OSAS in children [Incerti Parenti, 2021], and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS [Stradling, 2016], OSAS in adults [Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022], and OSAS in children [Alsubie, 2017; Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
Clinical features on history taking
- The European working group report of the ERS/ESRS notes that use of screening questionnaires that ask about symptoms may be more useful with additional input from a partner. It also highlights there is often poor correlation between excessive daytime sleepiness symptoms and severity of OSAS recorded in sleep studies. The presence of associated comorbidities has a predictive value when making a diagnosis of OSAS [Randerath, 2018].
- The importance of assessing driving and/or work-related safety issues is highlighted in the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS [Randerath, 2018], the BTS position statement [BTS, 2018], the Japanese SAS Guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], and is also based on expert opinion in a review article [Arachchige, 2022].
- The NICE technology appraisal guidance states that symptoms of OSAS include impaired alertness, cognitive impairment, excessive daytime sleepiness, snoring, nocturia, morning headaches and sexual dysfunction, that sleep quality of partners may be affected, and excessive daytime sleepiness can adversely affect cognitive function, mood and quality of life [NICE, 2021].
- Expert opinion in a review article advises that in children neuromuscular conditions and cerebral palsy can present with pharyngeal muscular hypotonia and muscle incoordination resulting in airway narrowing, collapse, and obstruction [Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
Clinical features on examination
- The recommendations to check for jaw abnormalities and nasopharyngeal obstruction are based on the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS [Randerath, 2018], NICE guidance which discusses the physical features that are associated with an increased risk of OSAS [NICE, 2021], and expert opinion in review articles [Alsubie, 2017; Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
- The recommendation to assess for cardiopulmonary comorbidity is based on the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS, which notes an increased disease burden and rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, together with a higher risk of death in people with COPD or a history of respiratory failure who have comorbid OSAS [Randerath, 2018].
- The recommendation to assess blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), and neck circumference is based on the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS, which notes that BMI and neck circumference have predictive value when making a diagnosis of OSAS [Randerath, 2018]. This approach is supported by expert opinion in a review article [Arachchige, 2022]. Expert opinion in an additional review article notes the importance of assessing BMI and growth in children [Savini, 2019].
Using screening questionnaires
- The NICE guideline recommends the use of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the STOP-Bang Questionnaire when assessing people with suspected OSAS [NICE, 2025].
- The ESS is only used to assess sleepiness, while the STOP-Bang Questionnaire assesses the risk of having OSAS (including questions about snoring, tiredness, history of high blood pressure, body mass index [BMI], age, neck size and sex).
- The NICE assessment committee noted that the ESS has low sensitivity and specificity for OSAS diagnosis. The committee also noted that not all people with OSAS experience excessive sleepiness.
- The STOP-Bang questionnaire has a high sensitivity for diagnosing OSAS.
- The recommendation to consider using a screening questionnaire to assess the extent and severity of OSAS symptoms in adults is based on the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS [Randerath, 2018], the ARTP guideline [ARTP, 2019], a systematic review of screening questionnaires [Amra, 2018], and expert opinion in review articles [Stradling, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020].
- The ARTP guideline notes that no screening questionnaire is sufficiently sensitive or specific to be used as a standalone test to diagnose OSAS, and they should be used in combination with an assessment of symptoms and sleep study results. It notes the high incidence of false-negative results for the detection of OSAS when questionnaires such as STOP-Bang and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) are used compared with results from sleep studies [ARTP, 2019].
- The recommendation not to use the ESS alone to determine referral is based on a NICE Guideline [NICE, 2025].
- Similarly, the European working group report notes that the ESS is the most widely used tool to evaluate subjective sleepiness, but it correlates poorly with the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) measured in sleep studies and with objective tests of excessive daytime sleepiness. It concludes that the ESS has a poor correlation with the presence and severity of OSAS at the individual level [Randerath, 2018].
- The recommendation to consider using the Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (SRBD-PSQ) to assess the extent and severity of symptoms is extrapolated from the BTS guideline which states that the questionnaire can be considered for diagnosing moderate-to-severe sleep disordered breathing in children of at least 2 years of age with no comorbidities [Evans, 2023]. It is also based on expert opinion in a review article [Gileles-Hillel, 2024] and a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from up to 7 studies which assessed the accuracy of the SRBD-PSQ compared with polysomnography for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea in children [Incerti Parenti, 2021].
- The meta-analysis suggested a sensitivity of the SRBD-PSQ of 0.76, but a lower specificity of 0.43.
- Expert opinion in a review article suggests that further investigations should be considered for children with a negative questionnaire result where there is a suspicion of OSAS [Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
What else might it be?
Other conditions that may present similarly to obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) include:
- Snoring
- Simple snoring — noisy breathing caused by turbulent airflow through the upper airway, for example, due to obesity, nasal obstruction, or upper respiratory tract infection.
- Daytime sleepiness
- Sleep disturbance or deprivation — for example, due to pain, anxiety, or employment with shift work. See the CKS topic on Sleep disorders - shift work and jet lag for more information.
- Other sleep disorders — such as insomnia, periodic limb movements (restless legs syndrome), narcolepsy, and parasomnias (including night terrors). See the CKS topics on Insomnia and Restless legs syndrome for more information.
- Neurological or neuromuscular disorders — such as previous head injury, motor neurone disease, Parkinson's disease, and myotonic dystrophy. See the CKS topic on Parkinson's disease for more information.
- Hypothyroidism. See the CKS topic on Hypothyroidism for more information.
- Depression. See the CKS topics on Depression and Depression in children for more information.
- Drugs — such as benzodiazepines, beta-blockers, anti-epileptic drugs, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
- Nocturnal choking or gasping
- Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). See the CKS topics on Dyspepsia - proven GORD and GORD in children for more information.
- Nocturnal asthma. See the CKS topic on Asthma for more information.
- Heart failure. See the CKS topic on Heart failure - chronic for more information.
- Panic attacks. See the CKS topics on Generalized anxiety disorder and Post-traumatic stress disorder for more information.
- Behavioural problems, reduced concentration (children)
- Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). See the CKS topic on Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder for more information.
Basis for recommendation
The information on differential diagnoses is largely based on the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS [Smith, 2011; Greenstone, 2014], on OSAS in children [Harrison, 2017; Savini, 2019], and on sleep disorders in children and adolescents [Kotagal, 2006].
Management
Scenario: Management of sleep apnoea
From age 12 months onwards.
When should I refer a person with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome?
If a person has suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS):
- Arrange urgent referral to a sleep clinic (ideally to be seen within 4 weeks) for further investigation and management if an adult:
- Has excessive sleepiness impacting their role as a professional driver or other safety-critical worker (for example, pilot, bus or lorry driver, or operator of dangerous machinery). Advise the person not to drive until they have been assessed by a specialist. See the section on Advice on driving for more information.
- Has a comorbid condition such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), poorly controlled arrhythmia, nocturnal angina, heart failure, treatment-resistant hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, or respiratory failure. See the CKS topics on Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Heart failure - chronic for more information.
- Is pregnant.
- Is undergoing pre-operative assessment for major surgery.
- Has non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.
- Has a learning disability or autism.
- Arrange routine referral to a sleep clinic for further investigation and management if an adult:
- Has suspected moderate or severe OSAS, or suspected mild OSAS that is impacting the person's quality of life.
- Arrange referral to a paediatric ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist if a child:
- Has clinical features of nasopharyngeal obstruction, such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy and regular snoring at night.
- Arrange referral to a paediatrician if a child has:
- A congenital or developmental disorder that may be contributing to symptoms.
- An associated condition and/or obesity.
Sleep studies
- Polysomnography (PSG) or a limited sleep study is often used to measure sleep-wake state and apnoea/hypopnoea episodes to confirm the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) in adults and children [Randerath, 2018; ARTP, 2019; Savini, 2019; Gottlieb, 2020; NICE, 2021].
- A limited sleep study can be set up at home, but more complex studies may require an overnight stay in a specialist sleep laboratory.
- The severity of OSAS is based on the severity of symptoms and the number of apnoea/hypopnoea episodes per hour (the apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]). AHI does not correlate well with the severity of clinical symptoms.
- The diagnosis of OSAS in adults requires at least five episodes of apnoea, hypopnoea, or both events lasting a minimum of 10 seconds per hour of sleep.
- Mild — AHI 5–14 per hour.
- Moderate — AHI 15–30 per hour.
- Severe — AHI more than 30 per hour.
- If access to home respiratory polygraphy is limited, NICE recommend that consideration could be given to the use of home oximetry for people with suspected OSAS [NICE, 2025].
- The oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is the number of episodes of oxygen desaturation per hour of sleep, and may be a more reliable predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than AHI [HE, 2023]. Overnight pulse oximetry may be used as a screening tool for some people to identify nocturnal desaturation events [Randerath, 2018; ARTP, 2019; Savini, 2019; Gottlieb, 2020].
Specialist treatments
Specialist treatments for confirmed obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) include the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), intra-oral devices, and/or surgery in selected people.
Specialist treatment for adults with OSAS includes:
- CPAP therapy — may be offered to all people with symptomatic OSAS, and is the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe OSAS [Francis, 2020; Gottlieb, 2020; NICE, 2021; Akashiba, 2022].
- Airway pressure may be delivered through a nasal or face mask for airflow delivery at night, and the pressure acts to splint the upper airways to prevent collapse during inspiration.
- Poor adherence to CPAP is common due to an ill-fitting mask, pressure intolerance, or upper airway symptoms such as nasal dryness or bleeding, or throat irritation. Adherence rates may improve with early patient education and support.
- There is evidence that CPAP therapy improves daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and quality of life in studies. In addition, it may lower blood pressure, especially in people with resistant hypertension, but there is no confirmed significant benefit on rates of cardiovascular or stroke disease.
- Treatment is needed long-term unless there is associated weight loss sufficient to cause disease remission.
- CPAP usage time influences its therapeutic effects with improvement of daytime sleepiness, hypertension and cardiovascular events having been reported, with nightly use for at least 4 hours or more.
- Intra-oral mandibular advancement devices — may be appropriate for people who snore or have mild OSAS with normal daytime alertness. They can also be used as an alternative for people unable to tolerate CPAP, who do not respond to CPAP, or who prefer treatment with an intra-oral device [Semelka, 2016] [Dieltjens, 2019; Francis, 2020; Gottlieb, 2020; Akashiba, 2022; Arachchige, 2022; NICE, 2025].
- Mandibular advancement devices consist of plates made to fit the upper and lower teeth to be worn during sleep, and vary in complexity and cost. They provide forward advancement of the mandible and attached tongue during sleep, to maintain an open upper airway and reduce airway collapsibility. Custom-made titratable appliances made by a dental specialist or maxillofacial surgeon may be most effective.
- These devices may not be suitable for people with active periodontal disease, untreated dental decay, few or no teeth, and people who experience generalised tonic-clonic seizures.
- A meta-analysis of 34 randomized controlled trials (n = 1301) found evidence of clinical benefit and reduced apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) measurements [Ramar, 2015].
- Upper airways surgery such as tonsillectomy — may be occasionally considered if there is evidence of nasopharyngeal obstruction causing symptoms or where OSAS is severe and the person has been unable to tolerate CPAP or a mandibular advancement device [NICE, 2025]. Very rarely alternative upper airway surgery to reduce the volume or configuration of oropharyngeal soft tissues or bony structures may be recommended if other treatments have failed [Stradling, 2016; Randerath, 2018].
- Additional specialist treatments, such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation, myofunctional therapy, pharmacological interventions, bariatric surgery, and maxillo‑mandibular osteotomy, may be offered in secondary care settings [; Arachchige, 2022].
Specialist treatment for children with OSAS includes:
- Adenotonsillectomy — may be offered to children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy to correct the anatomic obstruction causing symptoms. This procedure is usually curative in children [Semelka, 2016; Randerath, 2018; Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
- CPAP therapy — may be considered in children if adenotonsillectomy is contraindicated or unsuccessful in resolving symptoms [Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on referral are based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s [NICE, 2025], the NICE technology appraisal guidance Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome [NICE, 2021], the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], the British Thoracic Society (BTS) position statement Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018 [BTS, 2018], the Japanese Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], guidance from NHS England Healthcare professionals guide to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) amongst people with a learning disability and autistic people [NHSE, 2024], a systematic review of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for OSAS [], and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS in adults [Semelka, 2016; Arachchige, 2022], OSAS in pregnancy [Middleton, 2022], and on OSAS in children [Harrison, 2017; Gileles-Hillel, 2024].
Arranging referral for adults
- The recommendation to arrange urgent referral for professional drivers or if OSAS symptoms impact on safety-critical work is based on NICE guidance and the BTS position statement [NICE, 2025; BTS, 2018]. The BTS statement advises that such cases should be fast-tracked for diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic OSAS within 4 weeks of referral, to allow rapid symptom control and to minimize time off work. It notes that this approach should give drivers the confidence to present with symptoms of suspected OSAS [BTS, 2018].
- The recommendation to arrange urgent referral if a person has cardiopulmonary comorbidities is based on NICE guidance and the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS [NICE, 2025; Randerath, 2018]. The ERS/ESRS report describes an increased disease burden and rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, together with a higher risk of death in people with COPD or a history of respiratory failure with comorbid OSAS [Randerath, 2018].
- The recommendation to arrange priority referral for people who are pregnant, undergoing pre-operative assessment for major surgery or have non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy is based on a NICE guideline [NICE, 2025] and expert opinion in review articles [Akashiba, 2022; Middleton, 2022].
- Several physiological adaptations to pregnancy can impact on both sleep quality and sleep disordered breathing, and several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the development of new snoring or abnormal breathing during sleep in pregnancy with worse maternal and fetal outcomes (including gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, stillbirth/neonatal death, preterm birth and low birth weight [<2500 g]) [Middleton, 2022].
- Recommendations on when to arrange routine referral are based on the European working group report of the ERS/ESRS, which notes that once OSAS is confirmed, excessive daytime sleepiness is rapidly resolved by appropriate specialist treatment [Randerath, 2018].
- The recommendation to arrange an urgent referral for adults with a learning disability or autism is based on guidance from NHS England [NHSE, 2024].
- This guidance highlights that assessment and diagnosis may be difficult in people with these conditions, and therefore recommends referral to a hospital sleep service for a formal assessment.
- The guidance also states that untreated OSAS can impact on mental health as well as causing significant risks to physical health. so treatment should be prioritised for people with a learning disability and autistic people, who often face health inequalities and the risk of premature mortality.
Sleep studies
- Considering home oximetry:
- The advice to consider home oximetry if respiratory polygraphy is limited is based on a NICE guideline [NICE, 2025]. NICE also advise that oximetry alone may be inaccurate for differentiating between OSAS and other causes of hypoxaemia in people with heart failure or chronic lung diseases.
Specialist treatments — Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
- CPAP treatment is effective for OSA, with CPAP treatment recommended as the first choice for patients with strong clinical symptoms such as daytime sleepiness due to OSA, and for moderate to severe cases [Akashiba, 2022].
- CPAP therapy significantly reduces excessive daytime sleepiness and driving risk in people with OSAS, however treatment has a limited impact on reducing cardiometabolic risk for most people, but may benefit people with high compliance to treatment and some patient subgroups [Randerath, 2018].
- The NICE guideline provides details of meta analyses that have demonstrated statistically significant greater reductions in daytime sleepiness with CPAP compared with placebo or usual care, as well as a reduction in arterial blood pressure compared with placebo or usual care, greater improvements in the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and minimum oxygen saturation during sleep in favour of CPAP compared with dental devices, and considerable reductions in the rate of road traffic accidents. Meta-analyses of studies comparing CPAP and placebo or usual care investigating health related quality-of-life related outcomes did not identify any statistically significant improvements with CPAP overall, though individual studies have described improvements in health subscales for bodily pain, emotional role, mental health, general health, physical function, social function and vitality [NICE, 2021].
- Expert opinion in a review article also notes that CPAP therapy has been shown to be superior to intra-oral devices in reducing apnoea-hypopnea indices (AHI), arousal indices, and oxygen desaturation, particularly in people with moderate-to-severe OSAS, although outcomes for quality-of-life indices appear to be similar to intra-oral devices [Semelka, 2016].
- Adherence to CPAP therapy appears moderate to high over the short to medium term, with ranges of 64–83% (mean 71%) adherence up to 12 months, 68–90% (mean 79%) for 12 months or more [NICE, 2021].
- Where CPAP adherence is affected due to upper airway side effects, such as nasal and mouth dryness, and CPAP-induced rhinitis, specialists may be able to offer a heated humidification device [NICE, 2021].
Specialist treatments — Intra-oral mandibular advancement devices
- Intra-oral mandibular advancement devices may improve certain quality of life aspects (specifically mental and physical), and may improve some cardiovascular risk factors for people with OSAS [Akashiba, 2022].
- The NICE guideline advises that specialists can consider the use of customised or semi-customised mandibular advancement splints as an alternative to CPAP, where CPAP has not been tolerated or declined, when the person is aged 18 or over, they have optimal dental and periodontal health (specifically listing people with active periodontal disease or untreated dental decay or few or no teeth), and do not have generalised tonic-clonic seizures [NICE, 2025].
- The NICE guideline provides details of the evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of mandibular advancement splints, which were provided from several separate studies where the quality of the evidence varied from moderate, to very low quality (evidence quality mainly downgraded due to risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision). In moderate severity OSAS, the evidence suggests a clinical benefit for mandibular advancement splints when compared to a placebo for AHI and quality of life scores in the physical domain, and a benefit for mandibular advancement splints when compared to CPAP in critical quality of life outcomes after 12 months of treatment [NICE, 2025].
Specialist treatments — Surgery
- The NICE guideline advises that there are no other treatment options for people with severe OSAS who cannot tolerate CPAP and mandibular advancement devices. The guideline therefore recommends that surgery for the right people, may improve their quality of life, but these people should have fully explored other treatment options under medical supervision for a sufficient period of time [NICE, 2025].
- The NICE guideline also highlights the potential risks of surgical intervention in people with severe OSAS, and stressed that a personalised approach is required to decide which people may be the most appropriate candidates for surgery [NICE, 2025].
- A systematic review identified a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effect of gastric banding compared with weight reducing diet on OSAS outcomes. The authors of the systematic review concluded that obese patients with OSAS who have not been able to improve their weight despite participating in a comprehensive weight reduction programme may benefit from bariatric surgery evaluation where there are no contraindications [].
Specialist treatments — Emerging treatments
- Emerging treatments such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation, myofunctional therapy, and medication therapy may be used in secondary care and investigated in clinical trials [; Arachchige, 2022]:
- Hypoglossal nerve stimulation can involve the implantation of a neurostimulator or use of a non-invasive electronic device that delivers an electric current to the distal branch of the hypoglossal nerve, resulting in genioglossus muscle contraction thereby preventing the tongue from causing airway obstruction during sleep [Arachchige, 2022]. This therapy may have benefits for people with symptomatic OSAS who cannot be sufficiently treated with more standard treatments (such as CPAP) [].
- Myofunctional therapy includes oropharyngeal exercises, circular breathing and muscle training via electrical stimulation. There is limited evidence available for these interventions, a systematic review identified only six small RCTs, with the findings suggesting only small and probably temporary advantage over more established treatments [].
- Medications such as pitolisant, solriamfetol, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and a combination of atomoxetine oxybutynin have been studied in clinical trials [; Arachchige, 2022]. Pitolisant and solriamfetol are not currently recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) [NICE, 2022a; NICE, 2022b], and the combination of atomoxetine oxybutynin has not been assessed.
How should I manage a person with confirmed obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome?
If a person has a confirmed diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) following specialist assessment:
- Provide advice on sources of information and support:
- The Sleep Apnoea Trust Association (website available at www.sleep-apnoea-trust.org) is a charity for people with sleep apnoea, their partners and families, which provides a variety of information leaflets on OSAS, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, weight loss, and driving.
- The British Lung Foundation (BLF) is a national charity supporting people with lung conditions, which has patient information on OSAS, diagnosis, treatment, driving, and travel, as well as information about OSAS in children.
- The NHS information leaflet Sleep apnoea.
- Offer management of any modifiable risk factors, and advise on lifestyle measures, such as:
- Weight loss, including diet, exercise, and/or weight loss surgery, if appropriate. See the CKS topic on Obesity for more information.
- Stopping smoking. See the CKS topic on Smoking cessation for more information.
- Reducing alcohol intake. See the CKS topic on Alcohol - problem drinking for more information.
- Avoiding sleeping on their back and to sleep on their side, where possible. The use of positioning pillows, devices, and alarms may be helpful.
- Encourage adherence to specialist treatment, such as CPAP therapy or intra-oral devices worn at night.
- People with a learning disability and autistic people with OSAS who are not compliant with CPAP therapy should be reviewed by the hospital sleep service.
- Monitor for and manage any associated conditions, including cardiometabolic disease and depression.
- Provide advice on driving regulations and advise the person to check with their insurer whether they are still insured to drive under their current policy. See the section on Advice on driving for more information.
- If not already explained by a specialist, provide advice about the risk of occupational injury, particularly for any safety-critical worker (for example, pilot, bus or lorry driver, or operator of dangerous machinery) with OSAS causing excessive sleepiness. Where appropriate:
- Advise safety-critical workers of the legal responsibility to inform their employer if OSAS is impacting the ability to perform their role safely.
- Provide a statement of fitness for work ('fit note'), advising that the person is not considered fit to work in their safety-critical role until their condition is appropriately managed.
- Reassess the person's fitness to work after a period of 3–4 weeks, or sooner if the person feels their sleepiness has resolved.
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on primary care management are based on the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine (AADSM) publication Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliance therapy: an update for 2015 [Ramar, 2015], the Japanese Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], guidance from NHS England Healthcare professionals guide to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) amongst people with a learning disability and autistic people [NHSE, 2024], two Cochrane systematic reviews on the effect of positional therapy on OSAS [Srijithesh, 2019] and on interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) [Askland, 2020], two meta-analysis studies and a network meta-analysis examining the effects of exercise on OSAS [Iftikhar, 2024; Lin, 2024; Tang, 2024], the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) guidance Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals [DVLA, 2025], the British Thoracic Society (BTS) position statement Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018 [BTS, 2018]; a systematic review of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for OSAS []; and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS [Stradling, 2016], on OSAS in adults [Semelka, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022], on OSAS in children [Harrison, 2017], and on intra-oral devices [Dieltjens, 2019; Francis, 2020].
Advising on lifestyle measures
- The recommendations on weight loss are based on the European working group report [Randerath, 2018], two systematic reviews with meta-analyses on the effects of exercise [Iftikhar, 2024; Lin, 2024; Tang, 2024], the Japanese SAS guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], and expert opinion in review articles [Semelka, 2016; Stradling, 2016; Harrison, 2017; Francis, 2020; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022].
- The European working group report recommends lifestyle measures are used in the management of OSAS, especially if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or other specialist treatments do not fully resolve symptoms. It states CPAP therapy should be combined with weight loss, and cites evidence of improved blood pressure control, insulin resistance, and lipid profile compared with when treatments are given alone. In addition, it highlights the benefits of bariatric surgery in selected obese patients [Randerath, 2018]. Similarly, the Japanese SAS guidelines highlight the additive effects of combined CPAP and weight loss on improving blood pressure among obese people with moderate to severe OSAS [Akashiba, 2022].
- Weight loss has been shown to decrease critical closing pressure of the airway, reducing the likelihood of pharyngeal collapse during sleep [Semelka, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020].
- Expert opinion in a review article recommends weight loss in children with obesity for long-term management of OSAS [Harrison, 2017].
- Two meta-analysis studies and a network meta-analysis have demonstrated improvements in OSAS symptoms among adults who undertake exercise [Iftikhar, 2024; Lin, 2024; Tang, 2024].
- The first meta-analysis of 11 small studies (n = 217) found a statistically significant reduction in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) following supervised exercise training, with a reduction in the severity of sleep apnoea symptoms when the weekly duration of aerobic exercise reached 100 min/week [Iftikhar, 2024].
- The second meta-analysis combined data from up to 12 studies (n = 264 adults), and showed a reduction in AHI, reduced Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) scores, and lower body mass index (BMI) in people with OSAS undertaking exercise (aerobic and/or resistance training). The authors concluded that the effect size of exercise on these outcomes was lower than what would be expected with CPAP, oral devices or surgical procedures, but comparable to body weight and diet control [Lin, 2024].
- The network meta-analysis included data from up to 24 studies (including up to 956 adults with OSAS). Aerobic exercise, combined exercise and oropharyngeal exercise were all found to improve Apnoea Hypopnea Index (AHI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores. Respiratory muscle training was found to improve PSQI and ESS scores. In the network meta-analyses, a combined exercise regime (aerobic and resistance) was found to be the most effective intervention in improving AHI scores, while oropharyngeal exercise was the most effective at improving PSQI and ESS scores, although there were no statistically significant differences between the interventions for any of the outcomes analysed [Tang, 2024].
- The recommendation on smoking cessation is based on the Japanese SAS guidelines [Akashiba, 2022] and extrapolated from expert opinion in a review article [Francis, 2020].
- The recommendation on alcohol consumption is based on expert opinion in review articles [Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022].
- The recommendation on sleeping position is based on the European working group report [Randerath, 2018], the Japanese SAS guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], a Cochrane systematic review of positional therapy for OSAS [Srijithesh, 2019], a systematic review of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for OSAS [], and expert opinion in review articles [Francis, 2020; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022].
- A Cochrane systematic review of five short-term studies of positional therapy compared with control including no intervention (n = 251) found moderate-certainty evidence that positional therapy significantly improved ESS scores, and low-certainty evidence of a reduction in AHI. There were no significant differences between the two groups on other outcomes such as quality of life or cognitive function [Srijithesh, 2019].
- A systematic review of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for OSAS found that CPAP showed a slightly better effectiveness compared to positional therapy, while the compliance on CPAP is somewhat lower [], but sleep disturbance is common and compliance may still be poor [Randerath, 2018].
- The Japanese SAS guidelines notes that sleeping in a lateral position rather than supine may reduce apnoea episodes [Akashiba, 2022], however expert opinion from a review article highlights that studies on not sleeping in a supine position have shown mixed results [Francis, 2020]. The Japanese guidelines recommend that patients with mild cases (along with those who have difficulty with standard treatment such as CPAP treatment), whose apnoea has been confirmed to reduce with sleeping in a lateral position, may benefit from altering their sleeping position [Akashiba, 2022].
Encouraging adherence with specialist treatment
- The recommendation on encouraging adherence with treatments is based on a Cochrane systematic review on usage of CPAP therapy [Askland, 2020], the European working group report [Randerath, 2018], the AASM/AADSM clinical practice guideline [Ramar, 2015], and expert opinion in review articles [Semelka, 2016; Dieltjens, 2019; Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022].
- A Cochrane systematic review of 41 studies (9005 adults) found high-certainty evidence that behavioural interventions increased usage of CPAP when compared with usual care, with low-certainty evidence of symptom improvement but likely no effect on quality of life. There was moderate-certainty evidence that supportive interventions also increased CPAP device usage, with associated small improvements in reported symptoms [Askland, 2020].
- The European working group report cites evidence that use of intra-oral devices in mild-to-moderate OSAS can improve symptoms, despite a reduced effect in lowering AHI [Randerath, 2018].
- The AASM/AADSM clinical practice guideline highlights the importance of follow up for people using mandibular devices to monitor efficacy, check for adverse effects, and encourage compliance [Ramar, 2015].
- Guidance is provided from NHS England highlighting that people with a learning disability and autistic people with OSAS may be at increased risk of complications if they or their carers do not understand the importance of consistently using a CPAP machine. The guidance also states the importance of reviewing compliance within primary care. Where non-compliance is identified in primary care, a review in secondary care is recommended [NHSE, 2024].
Monitoring for and managing associated conditions
- The recommendations on monitoring for and managing associated cardiometabolic conditions and depression are based on the European working group report [Randerath, 2018] and expert opinion in review articles [Semelka, 2016; Stradling, 2016; Gottlieb, 2020]. They are also pragmatic, based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Advising safety-critical workers and issuing fitness for work statements
- The advice about employee legal responsibilities with informing their employer if their health is impacting their ability to perform their role safely is based on Section 7 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 [HSWA, 1974].
- This section of the act states that it is the duty of every employee, while at work, to take reasonable care for the health and safety of himself and of other persons who may be affected by his acts or omissions at work.
- Guidance for healthcare professionals about issuing a statement of fitness for work ('fit note') is provided by the UK Government's Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) [DWP, 2023].
- The fit note should cover the duration that the patient is likely to be unfit for work duties and provide advice for the patient and their employer to help them stay in, or return to, work.
- The length of a fit note should be based on clinical judgement. In the first six months of a person’s health condition, a fit note can only be issued for a maximum of three months at a time.
- The guidance about when to reassess a person's fitness to work is pragmatic based on the expected time it would take for CPAP therapy to improve symptoms of sleepiness.
What advice should I give about driving?
Advise a person that they may continue to drive and do not need to notify the DVLA if they have suspected or confirmed obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) but do not have excessive sleepiness that has, or is likely to have, an adverse effect on driving.
Advise a person who drives and has excessive sleepiness:
- Due to suspected OSAS or confirmed mild OSAS:
- They must not drive.
- Driving may resume only after satisfactory symptom control.
- If symptom control cannot be achieved in 3 months, the person must notify the Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA).
- They must not drive.
- Due to confirmed moderate or severe OSAS:
- They must not drive and must notify the DVLA. The gov.uk publication Excessive sleepiness and driving has information on how to notify the DVLA.
- Subsequent licensing will require control of the condition; improved sleepiness; treatment adherence. Note: the DVLA will need medical confirmation, and Group 1 (car and motorcycle) drivers must confirm review to be undertaken every 3 years at the minimum, while Group 2 (bus and lorry) drivers must confirm review to be undertaken annually at the minimum.
- The DVLA patient leaflet Tiredness can kill. Sleepiness and tiredness may be helpful for Group 1 and 2 drivers concerned about excessive sleepiness.
Basis for recommendation
The information on driving regulations is taken from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) guidance Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals [DVLA, 2025] and the British Thoracic Society (BTS) position statement Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018 [BTS, 2018].
Drivers who do not have excessive sleepiness
- The information for drivers who do not have excessive sleepiness is extrapolated from the DVLA guidance [DVLA, 2025]. It is also based on the BTS position statement, which notes that there is a risk that asymptomatic people or people with mild obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) without excessive sleepiness may stop driving unnecessarily without being given accurate information on driving regulations [BTS, 2018].
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s [NICE, 2025], the NICE technology appraisal guidance Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome [NICE, 2021], the European working group report of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea [Randerath, 2018], the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline for diagnosing and monitoring paediatric sleep-disordered breathing [Evans, 2023], the BTS position statement Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018 [BTS, 2018], the Japanese Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines [Akashiba, 2022], and expert opinion in review articles on OSAS in adults [Gottlieb, 2020; Arachchige, 2022] and children [Savini, 2019; Gileles-Hillel, 2024]. The rationale for recommendations is summarized in the relevant basis for recommendation sections.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of obstructive sleep apnoea, with additional searches in the following areas:
- Prevalence and incidence in children and adults
- Referral criteria
- Complications of obstructive sleep apnoea (including cardiovascular risk, diabetes, quality of life)
Search dates
January 2021 - October 2025
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
Sleep apneoa, obstructive/
(sleep* adj4 (apn?ea* or hypopn?ea*)).ti,ab
(sleep* adj4 disorder* adj4 breath*).ti,ab.
(OSAHS or OSA or OSAS).ti,ab.
(obes* adj3 hypoventil*).ti,ab
Pickwick.ti,ab.
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- Akashiba, T., Inoue, Y., Uchimura, N., et al. (2020) Sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) clinical practice guidelines 2020. Respiratory Investigation 60(1), 3-32. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Alsubie, H.S. and BaHammam, A.S. (2017) Obstructive sleep apnoea: children are not little adults. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 21(72), 72-79. [Abstract]
- Amra, B., Rahmati, B., Soltaninejad, F. and Feizi, A. (2018) Screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea: an updated systematic review. Oman Medical Journal 33(3), 184-192. [Abstract]
- Arachchige, M.A. and Steier, J. (2021) Beyond usual care: A multidisciplinary approach towards the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 5(8), 747495. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- ARTP (2019) Standards of care for sleep apnoea services (diagnostics). Association for Respiratory Technology and Physiology. http://www.artp.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Askland, K., Wright, L., Wozniak, D.R., et al. (2020) Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea (Cochrane Review). Issue 4. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- Badr, M.S., Khayat, R.N., Allam, J.S., et al. (2025) Treatment of central sleep apnea in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 10.5664. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Bassetti, C.L.A., Randerath, W., Vignatelli, L., et al. (2020) EAN/ERS/ESO/ESRS statement on the impact of sleep disorders on risk and outcome of stroke. European Journal of Neurology 27(7), 1117-1136. [Abstract]
- Bonsignore, M.R., Baiamonte, P., Mazzuca, E., et al. (2019) Obstructive sleep apnea and comorbidities: a dangerous liaison. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 14(8). [Abstract]
- Brunetti, L., Rana, S., Lospalluti, M.L., et al. (2001) Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a cohort of 1,207 children of southern Italy. Chest 120(6), 1930-1935. [Abstract]
- BTS (2018) Position statement. Driving and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) 2018. British Thoracic Society. http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Dieltjens, M. and Vanderveken, O. (2019) Oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnea. Healthcare (Basel) 7(4). [Abstract]
- DVLA (2025) Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- DWP (2023) Fit note: guidance for healthcare professionals. Department for Work and Pensions. https://www.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Evans, H.J., Gibson, N.A., Bennett, J., et al. (2023) British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnosing and monitoring paediatric sleep-disordered breathing. Thorax 78(Suppl 2), S1-S27. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Francis, C.E. and Quinnell, T. (2020) Mandibular advancement devices for OSA: an alternative to CPAP? Pulmonary Therapy 7(1), 25-36. [Abstract]
- Garbarino, S., Guglielmi, O., Sanna, A., et al. (2016) Risk of occupational accidents in workers with obstructive sleep apnea: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep 39(6), 1211-1218. [Abstract]
- Gileles-Hillel, A., Bhattacharjee, R., Gorelik, M. and Narang, I. (2024) Advances in sleep-disordered breathing in children. Clinics in Chest Medicine 45(3), 651-662. [Abstract]
- Gottlieb, D.J. and Punjabi, N.M. (2020) Diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnea: a review. JAMA 323(14), 1389-1400. [Abstract]
- Greenstone, M. and Hack, M. (2014) Obstructive sleep apnoea. British Medical Journal 348, 3745-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24939874/. [Abstract]
- Harrison, R., Edmiston, R. and Mitchell, C. (2017) Recognising paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care: diagnosis and management. British Journal of General Practice 67(659), 282-283. [Abstract]
- He, S., Cistulli, P.A. and de Chazal, P. (2023) A review of novel oximetry parameters for the prediction of cardiovascular disease in obstructive sleep apnoea. Diagnostics 13(21), 3323. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Heinzer, R., Vat, S., Marques-Vidal, P., et al. (2015) Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypoLaus study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 3(4), 310-318. [Abstract]
- UK Government Legislation (1974) Health and Safety at Work Act. UK Public General Acts. UK Government. https://www.legislation.gov.uk [Free Full-text]
- Iftikhar, I.H., Reynolds, A.M., AlBisher, E., et al. (2024) Aerobic exercise training and obstructive sleep apnea: dose-response meta-analyses. Sleep and Breathing 28(6), 2355-2366. [Abstract]
- Incerti Parenti, S., Fiordelli, A., Bartolucci, M.L., et al. (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews 57. [Abstract]
- Kotagal, S. and Pianosi, P. (2006) Sleep disorders in children and adolescents. BMJ 332(7545), 828-832. [Abstract]
- Lin, C.F., Ho, N.H., Hsu, W.L., et al. (2024) Effects of aerobic exercise and resistance training on obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 20(11), 1839-1849. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Loke, Y., Brown, J., Kwok, C., et al. (2012) Association of obstructive sleep apnea with risk of serious cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 5(5), 720-728. [Abstract]
- Middleton, P.G. (2022) Obstructive sleep apnoea and sleep disorders in pregnancy. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 85(Part A), 107-113. [Abstract]
- NHS England (2024) Healthcare professionals guide to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) amongst people with a learning disability and autistic people. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2021) Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome [TA139]. Technology appraisal guidance. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022a) Pitolisant hydrochloride for treating excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnoea [TA776]. Technology appraisal guidance. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2022b) Solriamfetol for treating excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnoea [TA777]. Technology appraisal guidance. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2025) Obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in over 16s [NG202]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Ramar, K., Dort, L.C., Katz, S.G., et al. (2015) Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring with oral appliance therapy: an update for 2015. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 11(7), 773-827. [Abstract]
- Randerath, W., Bassetti, C.L., Bonsignore, M.R., et al. (2018) Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea: report by an ad hoc working group of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society and the European Sleep Research Society. European Respiratory Journal 52(3). [Abstract]
- Savini, S., Ciorba, A., Bianchini, C., et al. (2019) Assessment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in children: an update. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 39(5), 289-297. [Abstract]
- Semelka, M., Wilson, J. and Floyd, R. (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. American Family Physician 94(5), 355-360. [Abstract]
- Smith, I. and Quinnell, T. (2011) Obstructive sleep apnoea: relevance to non-sleep clinicians. Clinical Medicine 11(3), 286-289. [Abstract]
- Srijithesh, P.R., Aghoram, R., Goel, A. and Dhanya, J. (2019) Positional therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (Cochrane Review). Issue 5. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com [Free Full-text]
- Stradling, J. (2016) Obstructive sleep apnoea: is it moving into primary care? British Journal of General Practice 66(643), 149-151. [Abstract]
- Tang, R., Pan, J., Huang, Y. and Ren, X. (2024) Efficacy comparison of aerobic exercise, combined exercise, oropharyngeal exercise and respiratory muscle training for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine 124, 582-590. [Abstract]
- Tregear, S., Reston, J., Schoelles, K. and Phillips, B. (2009) Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of motor vehicle crash: systemic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 5(6), 573-581. [Abstract]
- Wang, Y., Liu, H., Zhou, B., et al. (2025) Menopause and obstructive sleep apnea: revealing an independent mediating role of visceral fat beyond body mass index. BMC Endocrine Disorders 25(1), 21. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Xie, W., Zheng, F. and Song, X. (2014) Obstructive sleep apnea and serious adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 93(29), e336. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]