Neurological
Trigeminal neuralgia
Last revised in January 2024
Trigeminal neuralgia occurs in the distribution of one or more branches of the fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerve.
Trigeminal neuralgia: Summary
- Trigeminal neuralgia occurs in the distribution of one or more branches of the fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerve.
- Pain may occur infrequently (periods of remission may last years) or hundreds of times a day.
- In over 90% of cases, trigeminal neuralgia is thought to be caused by vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve.
- Trigeminal neuralgia is more common in women than in men. The incidence increases with age and is rare in people younger than 40 years of age.
- Complications include depression and inability to eat, causing weight loss.
- Features of trigeminal neuralgia include paroxysmal attacks of pain which may be precipitated by trigger factors.
- 'Atypical' or 'mixed' trigeminal neuralgia occurs when there is a persistent discomfort between paroxysms.
- The drug of choice for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is carbamazepine:
- Dose should be titrated until pain is relieved. In the majority of people a dose of 200 mg three or four times a day is sufficient to prevent paroxysms of pain.
- If carbamazepine is contraindicated, ineffective, or not tolerated, specialist advice should be sought, or referral made to a neurologist or a specialist in pain management. A daily pain diary may be useful to help people learn to manage their pain.
- When the pain is in remission the dose of carbamazepine should be reduced and gradually withdrawn.
- Referral to a neurologist or a specialist in pain management should be considered if the person has severe pain, or pain that limits their daily activities.
- Specialist referral, with urgency determined by clinical judgment, is advised if there are atypical clinical features, or features suggestive of a serious underlying cause.
Have I got the right topic?
From age 18 years onwards.
This CKS topic covers the management of trigeminal neuralgia in adults (excluding pregnant or breastfeeding women).
This CKS topic does not cover the management of other causes of facial pain, including trigeminal neuropathic pain (also called atypical odontalgia).
There are separate CKS topics on Migraine, Neuropathic pain - drug treatment, Palliative cancer care - pain, Post-herpetic neuralgia, and Shingles.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
January 2024 — minor update. Adverse effects and interactions for carbamazepine updated in line with manufacturer's SPC.
Previous changes
January 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in November 2021 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. Updated literature has been incorporated to provide supporting evidence for the guidance. Addition of a differential diagnosis section. Minor changes to prescribing advice in line with manufacturer's guidance (SmPC for Tegretol). No major changes to the clinical recommendations have been made.
January 2018 — minor update. Revised SPC for Tegretol (carbamazepine) - all formulations, information regarding drug interactions updated as per revised SPC.
February to March 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in February 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials published since the last revision of this topic. The topic has undergone restructuring. No major changes to the recommendations have been made.
December 2016 — minor update. Information that carbamazepine levels may be increased when taken concomitantly with antivirals, such as ritonavir, has been added to the drug interactions section of this topic, in line with the manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics.
December 2014 — minor update. Minor typographical error corrected.
March 2014 — minor update. The recommendation to consider gabapentin if carbamazepine is inappropriate, ineffective, or not tolerated has been changed in line with the updated NICE guideline on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Specialist advice or referral is now recommended in this case.
January 2014 — minor update. Minor text changes to reflect the updated Summary of Product Characteristics for carbamazepine tablets regarding the maximum recommended daily dose for management of trigeminal neuralgia and minor typographical error corrected.
October 2012 to February 2013 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in September 2012 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key RCTs published since the last revision of this topic. Pregabalin has been added to the treatment options.
September 2010 — minor update. A Prescribing information section has been included in this topic. Issued in September 2010.
June to November 2008 — converted from CKS guidance to CKS topic structure. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There have been no major changes to the recommendations.
April 2008 — minor update. Update to the text in medicines management to reflect recent MHRA advice regarding genetic testing for carbamazepine. Issued May 2008.
July 2007 — minor update. Clarification of when to refer for an MRI head scan to exclude a structural cause has been included. Issued in August 2007.
June 2007 — minor update. Gabapentin is now licensed up to a maximum dose of 3600 mg per day for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Issued in June 2007.
January 2007 — typographical error corrected. Issued in January 2007.
October 2005 — minor technical update. Issued in November 2005.
March 2005 — reviewed. Validated in June 2005 and issued in July 2005.
January 2002 — reviewed. Validated in March 2002 and issued in April 2002.
October 1998 — written. Validated in November 1998 and issued in December 1998.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 January 2022.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs since 1 January 2022.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 January 2022.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analysis which reach the CKS threshold for inclusion since 1 January 2022.
Primary evidence
No new primary evidence which reaches the CKS threshold for inclusion published since 1 January 2022.
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 January 2022.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 January 2022.
Changes in product availability
No changes in product availability since 1 January 2022.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Make a diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia.
- Prescribe carbamazepine for pain relief where appropriate.
- Provide appropriate advice and information.
- Arrange referral to a neurologist, or to a specialist pain service, where appropriate.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.Background information
What is it?
- Trigeminal neuralgia is typically defined as severe, episodic facial pain, in the distribution of one or more branches of the fifth (trigeminal) cranial nerve.
- Typically, the maxillary or mandibular branches are affected, either alone or in combination. Involvement of the ophthalmic branch alone is uncommon.
- Pain may last up to 2 minutes.
- Only 3% of cases are bilateral.
- Pain may occur infrequently (periods of remission may last years) or up to hundreds of times a day.
- Paroxysms of pain can be triggered by a number of factors including touching the face, talking, cold wind, vibration, and cleaning the teeth.
- 'Atypical' or 'mixed' trigeminal neuralgia occurs when there is a persistent discomfort between paroxysms or sensory loss, and is more often refractory to treatment than classic trigeminal neuralgia.
- There are three aetiological categories of trigeminal neuralgia:
- Classical — caused by vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve root.
- Secondary — occurs as a consequence of major neurological disease (e.g. tumour of the cerebellopontine angle or multiple sclerosis).
- Idiopathic — occurs without apparent cause.
[Nurmikko, 2001; Bennetto, 2007; Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015; ; IHS, 2018; Bendsten, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2018; RCSE, 2021]
What are the risk factors for trigeminal neuralgia?
- Risk factors for trigeminal neuralgia include:
- Multiple sclerosis.
- Advancing age — trigeminal neuralgia is rare in people under 40 years old. Peak incidence is between age 50 and 60 years.
- Female sex.
- Family history — although rare, familial clusters of trigeminal neuralgia have been reported.
- Hypertension and stroke — however, this association could be due to chance as hypertension and degenerative disease share common epidemiology.
[Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2018]
How common is it?
- Trigeminal neuralgia is rare, high quality epidemiological data are scarce, and its true incidence is unclear, but thought to be between 4 and 13 per 100,000:
- Data from the United States demonstrated a crude annual incidence of 5.7 per 100,000 women and 2.5 per 100,000 men.
- A general practice-based survey from the UK found an annual incidence of 8 per 100,000 and a lifetime prevalence of 0.7 per 1000 people per year.
- A subsequent UK general practice database study reported an incidence of 27 per 100,000 person years.
- A study carried out in Holland reported an incidence of 12.6 per 100,000 person years.
- A community based study in Germany with neurologists reported a lifetime prevalence of 0.3%.
[MacDonald, 2000; Zakrzweska, 2014; BMJ Best Practice, 2018; Jones, 2019]
What is the prognosis of trigeminal neuralgia?
- Episodes of trigeminal neuralgia can occur daily for weeks or months, and/or there can be months or years of remission.
- 50% of people with trigeminal neuralgia experience remissions of at least 6 months’ duration.
- 65% of people newly diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia will have a second episode within 5 years, and 77% within 10 years.
- Periods of remission tend to get shorter with time, and attacks of pain get longer.
- People with atypical trigeminal neuralgia/type 2 trigeminal neuralgia also experience background pain of lower intensity for 50% of the time.
- Up to 10% of people with trigeminal neuralgia will not respond to neuropathic pain drug therapy.
- Those who find at least partial relief from symptoms may become less responsive to drug therapy or relapse over time.
[Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015; BMJ Best Practice, 2018]
What are the complications of trigeminal neuralgia?
- Complications of trigeminal neuralgia include:
- Impairment of activities of daily living.
- Depression/isolation.
- Weight loss caused by inability to eat.
Diagnosis
When should I suspect trigeminal neuralgia?
- Suspect trigeminal neuralgia if the person has pain in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve (usually in the cheek or lower jaw) that is:
- Severe — often described as electric shock-like, sharp, or shooting. Some people experience continued aching after the acute pain has resolved.
- Unilateral — trigeminal neuralgia is bilateral in only 3% of people and is rarely active bilaterally.
- Short-lived — lasting a few seconds to 2 minutes and stopping suddenly.
- Recurrent — the person may experience many attacks a day, with a refractory period between each attack.
- Episodic — the pain may go into remission for weeks or months before returning. Pain free periods tend to gradually shorten between episodes.
- Provoked by factors such as light touch to the face, eating, talking, or exposure to cold air.
- Some people with trigeminal neuralgia may also have autonomic features such as conjunctival injection, lacrimation, nasal congestion or rhinorrhoea, eye lid oedema, ptosis, or facial sweating.
- Examine the person's face and oral cavity (including the trigeminal nerves) to rule out dental causes of pain, and to detect any abnormalities that require referral to a neurologist (see below).
- Be aware of serious conditions which can lead to compression of the trigeminal nerve, or cause symptoms similar to those of trigeminal neuralgia, including:
- Tumours, such as posterior fossa tumours, extracranial masses along the trigeminal nerve, perineural spread of existing malignancy, cavernous sinus masses.
- Multiple sclerosis.
- Epidermoid, dermoid, or arachnoid cysts.
- Aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation.
- Assess for the presence of red flag symptoms and signs that may suggest a serious underlying cause, including:
- Sensory changes.
- Deafness or other ear problems.
- History of skin or oral lesions that could spread perineurally.
- Pain only in the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve (eye socket, forehead, and nose), or bilaterally.
- Optic neuritis.
- Family history of multiple sclerosis.
- Age of onset before 40 years.
Basis for recommendation
The information on the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia is based on expert opinion in three narrative review articles [Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015; Besi, 2019] and in an information leaflet Trigeminal neuralgia: an overview from the Trigeminal Neuralgia Association UK [Trigeminal neuralgia association UK, 2016].
What else could it be?
Facial pain experienced in trigeminal neuralgia is severe, intense, short-lived, recurrent, and episodic. Also, it is usually unilaterally distributed around the trigeminal nerve. Differential diagnoses may be identified through history taking and clinical examination. Other common causes of painful cranial neuropathies or facial pains can include temporomandibular disorders, dental pain, cluster headache, salivary gland or sinus problems, and post-herpetic neuralgia.
Management
Scenario: Management of trigeminal neuralgia
From age 18 years onwards.
How should I manage a person with trigeminal neuralgia?
- If there are red flag symptoms and signs that may suggest a serious underlying cause, admit, or refer urgently for specialist assessment, depending on clinical judgement.
- Assess the person for signs of depression. For more information, see the CKS topic on Depression.
- If there are no red flag symptoms and signs, offer the person carbamazepine.
- Carbamazepine is the only licensed anticonvulsant medication with proven efficacy to treat trigeminal neuralgia.
- Initiate therapy at 100 mg up to twice daily, and titrate in steps of 100–200 mg every 2 weeks, until pain has been relieved.
- In the majority of people a dosage of 200 mg three or four times a day is sufficient to prevent paroxysms of pain (maximum dosage 1600 mg daily).
- Modified release preparations may be useful, particularly if the person experiences breakthrough pain at night. A usual dose is 600–800 mg in two divided doses (maximum dosage 1600 mg daily in two divided doses).
- Once the pain is in remission, the dosage should be gradually reduced to the lowest possible maintenance level, or the drug can be discontinued until a further attack occurs.
- For further information on contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, drug interactions, and monitoring with carbamazepine, see the section on Prescribing information.
- If carbamazepine is contraindicated, ineffective, or not tolerated, seek specialist advice. Do not offer any other drug treatment unless advised to do so by a specialist. However, other treatments initiated by a specialist may be continued in primary care under a multidisciplinary care plan or a local shared-care agreement.
- Specialist initiated medications may include other anticonvulsant medications such as oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin and pregabalin, or non-anticonvulsant medications such as baclofen.
- Arrange early follow up to assess the progress made with dose titration, and the tolerability and effectiveness of the treatment. Timing of follow up should be based on clinical judgement.
- Advise the person:
- On the importance of dosage titration, and the titration process, providing written information if possible. Explain that the treatment does not work immediately; it commonly takes weeks to titrate up to an effective dose.
- On the possible adverse effects associated with use of carbamazepine.
- That a daily pain diary may be useful to help people learn to manage their pain.
- Consider referring the person to a neurologist or specialist pain service if:
- They have severe pain.
- Their pain significantly limits their participation in daily activities (including self care, general tasks and demands, interpersonal interactions and relationships, mobility, and sleeping).
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on management of trigeminal neuralgia are largely based on expert opinion in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Neuropathic pain — pharmacological management. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020), two narrative review articles [Zakrzewska, 2015; Besi, 2019], a BMJ Best Practice guideline [BMJ Best Practice, 2018], and guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England [RCSE, 2021]. The Royal College of Surgeons of England advise that oxcarbazepine can be initiated in primary care but CKS notes that this is an off-license use of this medication.
Assessing for the presence of depression
- The recommendation to assess people with trigeminal neuralgia for signs of depression recommendation is based on expert opinion in narrative review articles that trigeminal neuralgia is associated with an increased risk of depression and suicide [Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015].
Carbamazepine dosing
- The information on carbamazepine dosing is taken from the British National Formulary [BNF, 2021].
Keeping a pain diary
- The advice relating to keeping a pain diary is based on feedback from an expert reviewer of a previous version of this CKS topic. It was suggested that keeping a pain diary may help people to feel in control, to understand how their pain responds to medication, and when they may be experiencing a remission or relapse.
Early follow up
- In the expert opinion of the NICE guideline development group, an early clinical review is important to assess the progress made with titration as well as the effectiveness and tolerability of treatment. This allows any necessary treatment adjustments to be made promptly in order to ensure optimal pain control [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020).
- CKS recommends using clinical judgement to decide how soon to follow up a person with neuropathic pain. This pragmatic advice is based on the fact that the urgency of a follow up will depend on several factors including the cause of neuropathic pain, severity of pain, and the complexity of the titration process.
How should I follow up a person with trigeminal neuralgia?
- Assess the progress made with dose titration, and the tolerability and effectiveness of treatment.
- Ask about the current dose of carbamazepine, any problems they have experienced titrating the dose upwards, and confirm that they understand the titration process.
- Ask about tolerability and adverse effects, and whether these tend to improve or persist with time following each dose increase.
- Assess the effectiveness of the treatment by asking about:
- The degree of pain.
- The impact of the pain on daily activities (including self care, general tasks and demands, interpersonal interactions and relationships, mobility, eating, and sleeping).
- Their mood (in particular, whether the person is depressed or anxious).
- If the treatment is poorly tolerated, use clinical judgement to decide whether to:
- Titrate the dose more slowly upwards (especially if adverse effects improve with time following each dose increase), or
- Refer to a specialist pain service or a neurologist.
- If the treatment is well tolerated, continue titrating the dose upwards until either pain is well controlled or the maximum tolerated dose has been reached.
- If pain is poorly controlled on the maximum tolerated dose, refer to a specialist pain service or a neurologist.
- If pain is well controlled, continue treatment. Consider gradually reducing the dose over time if the person remains pain free for 1 month.
- Consider referring the person to a specialist pain service or a neurologist at any stage, if:
- They have severe pain.
- Their pain significantly limits their daily activities (including self care, general tasks and demands, interpersonal interactions and relationships, mobility, and sleeping).
- The person has atypical clinical features (for example burning pain between paroxysms, loss of sensation, or any abnormal neurological signs).
Basis for recommendation
The recommendations on how to follow up a person with trigeminal neuralgia are largely based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline Neuropathic pain — pharmacological management. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020).
Assessing progress made with dose titration, tolerability, and effectiveness of treatment
- In the expert opinion of the NICE guideline development group (GDG), assessing progress made with dose titration, the tolerability, and the effectiveness of the current treatment is important, to allow any necessary treatment adjustments to be made promptly in order to ensure optimal pain control [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020).
Poorly tolerated treatment
- CKS recommends using clinical judgement if treatment is poorly tolerated. This pragmatic advice is based on the fact that slower titration may reduce the risk of intolerable adverse effects for some people whilst others may need to be referred.
Well tolerated treatment
- The recommendations to continue treatment if pain is well controlled and to consider gradually reducing the dose over time if the improvement is sustained is based on the expert opinion of the NICE GDG [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020).
Stopping treatment
- CKS found no evidence on the recommended duration of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. The opinions of expert reviewers of previous versions of this topic differed regarding the length of time for which treatment should be tried before reducing or stopping medication. Considering this with the Summary of Product Characteristics for carbamazepine [ABPI, 2021], CKS has made a practical recommendation.
Referral
- NICE recommends considering referral at any stage (including at initial presentation and at regular clinical reviews) if pain is severe; pain significantly limits daily activities and quality of life; their underlying health condition has deteriorated; or treatment is inappropriate, ineffective, or not tolerated [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020).
- Other criteria for referral are based on expert opinion in review articles [Bennetto, 2007; Zakrzewska, 2015; Besi, 2019], a BMJ Best Practice guideline [BMJ Best Practice, 2018], and guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England [RCSE, 2021], in addition to feedback from an expert reviewer of a previous version of this CKS topic.
- The diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia should be reviewed if medical treatment fails.
- Surgical options should be considered if pain control cannot be achieved, or drugs cause unacceptable adverse effects. This should be done at the earliest possible stage if medical treatment fails.
- An MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scan is indicated in younger people, those with atypical symptoms, people who do not respond to initial therapy, or anyone for whom neurosurgery is being considered. CKS recommends referral to a specialist for MRI assessment. CKS advises 40 years of age, as trigeminal neuralgia is rare below this age.
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC), or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Carbamazepine
Contraindications and cautions
- Do not prescribe carbamazepine to people:
- With a known hypersensitivity to carbamazepine or structurally related drugs (for example tricyclic antidepressants) or any other component of the formulation.
- With atrioventricular block.
- With a history of bone marrow depression.
- With a history of hepatic porphyrias.
- Taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor.
- Prescribe carbamazepine with caution to people:
- At risk of suicide.
- With cardiac disease.
- With a history of haematological reactions to other drugs.
- With a history of absence and myoclonic seizures.
- With a history of skin reactions.
- Who are susceptible to angle-closure glaucoma.
- Who are pregnant. Follow MHRA safety advice on antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy.
- Consider vitamin D supplementation in patients who are immobilized for long periods or who have inadequate exposure to sun/low dietary calcium.
What are the adverse effects and how can they be managed?
- Common adverse effects of carbamazepine include nausea and vomiting, sedation, dizziness, and ataxia.
- These adverse effects are dose related and are most common at the start of treatment and in older people.
- Switching to a modified-release preparation of carbamazepine may help to reduce the incidence of central nervous system adverse effects, such as sedation.
- Hypersensitivity reactions (including rash, pruritus, urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis):
- Discontinue treatment if these occur.
- Cross-sensitivity has been reported with other antiepileptic drugs (including oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, primidone, and phenobarbital).
- Rarely, serious dermatological adverse effects, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and exfoliative dermatitis, can occur.
- People who are of Han Chinese, Hong Kong Chinese, or Thai origin should be screened for the presence of the HLA-B*1502 allele before taking carbamazepine. Those who test positive should not start carbamazepine unless there is no other treatment option.
- Testing for this allele should also be considered in people originating from Malaysia and the Philippines.
- Hyponatraemia occurs in 20% of people taking carbamazepine. It is usually mild but in rare cases can lead to water intoxication accompanied by lethargy, vomiting, headache, and confusion.
- Consider hyponatraemia if the person develops dizziness, drowsiness, confusion, nausea, muscle cramps, or seizures.
- If hyponatraemia is suspected, reduce the dose or stop carbamazepine and manage according to severity of symptoms, duration, and state of hydration.
- Leucopenia (very common) and other blood disorders (including thrombocytopenia, agranulocytosis, and aplastic anaemia) may occur with carbamazepine treatment.
- Advise people taking carbamazepine to seek immediate medical attention if they develop symptoms indicative of blood, hepatic, or skin disorders (for example fever, sore throat, rash, mouth ulcers, bruising, or bleeding).
- There is a small risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour associated with antiepileptic drug use, which may be seen as early as 1 week after starting treatment.
- People taking carbamazepine and healthcare professionals should be alert to any mood changes, distressing thoughts, or feelings about suicide or self-harm at any point during treatment.
- Some of these adverse reactions (including headache, ataxia, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, blurring of vision, dizziness, and allergic skin reactions) are dose related, and may be dose-limiting. These side-effects are more common at the start of treatment and in the elderly.
Drug interactions
- The use of carbamazepine is not recommended in combination with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), or for 2 weeks after stopping an MAOI.
- Avoid giving carbamazepine with diuretics — increased risk of hyponatraemia.
- The plasma concentration of carbamazepine may be increased (with an increased risk of toxicity) by the concomitant use of certain drugs, including:
- Acetazolamide.
- Antidepressants — fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, trazodone.
- Azole antifungals.
- Antivirals — protease inhibitors for HIV treatment (for example ritonavir).
- Cimetidine.
- Ciprofloxacin.
- Clarithromycin.
- Danazol.
- Dextropropoxyphene.
- Diltiazem.
- Erythromycin.
- Isoniazid.
- Olanzapine.
- Omeprazole
- Verapamil.
- Vigabatrin.
- Carbamazepine accelerates the metabolism of certain drugs, including (but not limited to):
- Azole antifungals — resulting in reduced levels of voriconazole and itraconazole.
- Ciclosporin — resulting in reduced levels of ciclosporin.
- Clozapine — resulting in reduced plasma concentration of clozapine; also avoid concomitant use of drugs with potential for causing agranulocytosis.
- Corticosteroids (systemic) — resulting in their reduced effect.
- Direct acting oral anti-coagulants (DOACs; rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) may lead to reduced plasma concentrations of DOACs, which carries the risk of thrombosis. Closer monitoring is recommended.
- Doxycycline — resulting in reduced effect.
- Oestrogens and progestogens — resulting in reduced effect of oral contraceptives.
- Thyroid hormones — requirements for thyroid hormones in hypothyroidism may be increased.
- Tricyclic antidepressants — resulting in their reduced effect.
- Simvastatin — consider increasing dose of simvastatin; statins metabolized by the same route as simvastatin may also have their levels reduced.
- Warfarin — resulting in reduced anticoagulant effect.
- Other interactions include:
- Grapefruit juice — may increase plasma concentrations.
- Lithuim — may result in enhanced neurotoxicity despite lithium plasma concentrations being within the therapeutic range.
- Paracetamol — long term co-administration may result in hepatotoxicity.
- Primidone, progabide, quetiapine, valproic acid, valnoctamide, and valpromide — may result in raised plasma levels of the active metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, increasing the risk of adverse reactions (e.g. dizziness, drowsiness, ataxia, diplopia). The dosage of carbamazepine should be adjusted accordingly and/or the plasma levels monitored when used concomitantly with these substances.
What monitoring is required?
- Serum carbamazepine levels should not be routinely monitored unless toxicity is suspected.
- A full blood count should ideally be done before starting treatment, and periodically thereafter.
- If the white blood cell or platelet count is low or decreased during treatment, the person and the full blood count should be closely monitored.
- Stop treatment if leucopenia develops that is severe, progressive, or accompanied by clinical symptoms (e.g. fever or sore throat), or if there is any evidence of significant bone marrow depression.
- Liver function tests should also be performed before commencing treatment and periodically thereafter, particularly in patients with a history of liver disease and in elderly patients.
- The drug should be withdrawn immediately in cases of aggravated liver dysfunction or acute liver disease.
- Some liver function tests in patients receiving carbamazepine may be found to be abnormal, particularly gamma glutamyl transferase. This is probably due to hepatic enzyme induction. Enzyme induction may also produce modest elevations in alkaline phosphatase. Observations of such liver function abnormalities are not an indication for carbamazepine withdrawal.
- Suicidal ideation and behaviour has been reported in patients treated with antiepileptic drugs. All patients receiving carbamazepine should be made aware of this risk. Should signs of suicidal ideation or behaviours present, medical advice should be sought and appropriate treatment should be considered.
Supporting evidence
This CKS topic is largely based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline Neuropathic pain - pharmacological management. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings [NICE, 2013] (last updated September 2020), expert opinion from narrative review articles [Zakrzweska, 2014; Zakrzewska, 2015; Besi, 2019], a BMJ Best Practice guideline [BMJ Best Practice, 2018], and guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England [RCSE, 2021]. The recommendations relevant to primary care were developed from the expert opinion of the guideline development group and authors of these reviews, following narrative reviews of the evidence, where available. The evidence for specialist management strategies is not discussed as they are beyond the scope of this CKS topic.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of trigeminal neuralgia.
Search dates
September 2012 - November 2021
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp Trigeminal Neuralgia/, trigeminal neuralgia.tw
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
- Bandolier
- Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- TRIP database
- Central Services Agency COMPASS Therapeutic Notes
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- ABPI (2021) SPC for Tegretol 200 mg Prolonged Release Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- Baxter, K. and Preston, C.L. (Eds.) (2013) Stockley's drug interactions: a source book of interactions, their mechanisms, clinical importance and management. 10th edn. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
- Bendtsen, L., Zakrzewska, J.M., Abbott, J., et al. (2019) European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia. European Journal of Neurology 26(6), 831-849. [Abstract]
- Bennetto, L., Patel, N.K. and Fuller, G. (2007) Trigeminal neuralgia and its management. British Medical Journal 334(7586), 201-205.
- Besi, E. and Zakrzewska, J.M. (2019) Trigeminal neuralgia and its variants. Management and diagnosis. Oral Surgery 13(4), 404-414. [Free Full-text]
- Moise, G. (2018) BMJ Best Practice - trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ Best Practice. [Abstract]
- BNF (2021) British National Formulary. BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- IHS (2018) Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1), 1-211. [Abstract]
- Jones, M.R., Urits, I., Ehrhardt, K.P., et al. (2019) A comprehensive review of trigeminal neuralgia. Current Pain and Headache Reports 23(10), 74-81. [Abstract]
- Lambru, G., Zakrzewska, J. and Matharu, M. (2021) Trigeminal neuralgia: a practical guide. Practical Neurology 21, 392-402. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- MacDonald, B.K., Cockerell, O.C., Sander, J.W. and Shorvon, S.D. (2000) The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain 123(4), 665-676. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2013) Neuropathic pain - pharmacological management. The pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Nurmikko, T.J. and Eldridge, P.R. (2001) Trigeminal neuralgia: pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment. British Journal of Anaesthesia 87(1), 117-132.
- Royal College of Surgeons of England (2021) Guidelines for the management oftrigeminal neuralgia. Royal College of Surgeons of England. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk [Free Full-text]
- Trigeminal neuralgia association UK (2016) Trigeminal Neuralgia: An overview. Trigeminal neuralgia association UK.. www.tna.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Zakrzewska, J.M. and Linskey, M.E. (2015) Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ 350, h1238.
- Zakrzewska, J.M. and Linskey, M.E. (2014) Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ 348, g474.