Allergies Skin and nail
Urticaria
Last revised in January 2026
Urticaria is a superficial swelling of the skin (epidermis and mucous membranes) that results in a red, raised, itchy rash.
Urticaria: Summary
- Urticaria is a superficial swelling of the skin (epidermis and mucous membranes) that results in a red, raised, itchy rash.
- Angio-oedema is a deeper form of urticaria with swelling in the dermis and submucosal or subcutaneous tissues.
- Urticaria can be classified according to its duration as:
- Acute — symptoms last for less than 6 weeks.
- Chronic — symptoms persist for 6 weeks or longer, on a nearly daily basis.
- Chronic urticaria is further classified as:
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria (previously called chronic idiopathic urticaria) — this has no identifiable external cause but may be aggravated by heat, stress, certain drugs, and infections.
- Autoimmune urticaria — characterized by the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies to the high-affinity receptor for IgE (Fc epsilon R1).
- Chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU, previously called physical urticaria) — occurs in response to a physical stimulus and can be further classified according to its cause as aquagenic, cholinergic, solar, cold, heat, dermatographism, delayed pressure, vibratory, and contact urticaria.
- Investigations are not usually required for the diagnosis of urticaria, but may be indicated (after a thorough history and physical examination) to identify associated conditions or trigger factors, or to exclude differential diagnoses.
- To manage urticaria, the underlying cause should be identified and managed, where possible.
- Acute urticaria is likely to be self-limiting without treatment.
- People with symptoms requiring treatment should be offered a non-sedating antihistamine to be taken daily for up to 6 weeks. For severe symptoms, a short course (up to 7 days) of an oral corticosteroid should also be offered.
- If symptoms improve, consideration should be given to prescribing antihistamine treatment daily for 3–6 months (if it is thought likely that symptoms will be persistent or recurrent), or as required or prophylactically (for people with infrequent symptoms).
- If response to treatment is inadequate, the following options should be considered (using clinical judgement):
- Gradually increasing the dose of the first-line antihistamine to up to four times the licensed dose (off-label use).
- An alternative non-sedating antihistamine.
- Adding a topical antipruritic agent (such as calamine lotion) to relieve itch.
- Adding a sedating antihistamine (such as chlorphenamine) at night, if itch is interfering with sleep.
- Referral to a dermatologist or immunologist.
- Referral to a dermatologist or immunologist should also be arranged if:
- Vasculitic urticaria (inflammation of blood vessels due to an autoimmune reaction) is suspected (for example if urticaria is painful and persistent).
- The person has a food or latex allergy, or a form of CINDU that may be difficult to manage in primary care (for example solar or cold urticaria).
- Referral to a clinical psychologist should be arranged for people whose symptoms are adversely affecting their quality of life, for example causing significant social or psychological problems.
Have I got the right topic?
From birth onwards.
This CKS topic covers the diagnosis, assessment, and management of urticaria in primary care.
This CKS topic does not cover in detail the specialist or secondary care management of urticaria. It also does not cover the management of angio-oedema, anaphylaxis, or acute drug reactions.
There are separate CKS topics on Adverse drug reactions, Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis, Asthma, Dermatitis - contact, Eczema - atopic, and Insect bites and stings.
The target audience for this CKS topic is healthcare professionals working within the NHS in the UK, and providing first contact or primary healthcare.
How up-to-date is this topic?
Changes
January 2026 — minor update. Added more information on titrating dose of antihistamines in the prescribing section.
Previous changes
March 2024 — minor update. A minor typographical error has been corrected.
January 2024 — minor update. Cetirizine doses for people with renal impairment updated in line with manufacturer's SPC.
June 2023 — minor update. Cetirizine doses for people with renal impairment updated in line with BNF.
November 2022 — minor update. Typographical error corrected.
September 2022 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in August 2022 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. No major changes to recommendations have been made.
August 2021 — minor update. Recommendations on use of cetirizine in people with renal impairment have been updated in line with the updated manufacturer's Summary of Product Characteristics.
March 2020 — minor update. Topic updated in line with revised SPC on non-sedating antihistamines.
January 2018 — minor update. Adverse effect section of non-sedating antihistamines updated to reflect changes to SPC.
March 2017 — reviewed. A literature search was conducted in March 2017 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. Changes to the topic include:
- New classification of chronic urticaria: based on the BSACI guideline for the management of chronic urticaria and angioedema published by the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, chronic urticaria is now classified as (Powell, 2015):
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU, previously called chronic idiopathic urticaria).
- Autoimmune urticaria (in European guidelines this comes under the CSU subtype).
- Chronic inducible urticaria (previously called physical urticaria).
- Length of treatment course: people with symptoms requiring treatment should be offered a suitable non-sedating antihistamine at the standard licensed dose to be taken daily for up to 4 weeks. Once symptom control has been achieved, antihistamine treatment should be taken daily for 3–6 months (for most people) or as required or prophylactically (for people with infrequent symptoms).
- Updosing of non-sedating antihistamines: for people not responding to standard doses of antihistamines, the dose of the first choice antihistamine should be increased gradually to up to four times the standard licensed dose (if appropriate).
- Assessing disease severity and impact on quality of life: this update includes the recommendation to consider assessing disease severity and impact on quality of life using validated tools, such as the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) and the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), respectively.
May 2016 — minor update. Text updated to reflect the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) safety update on the risk of QT interval prolongation and Torsade de Pointes with hydroxyzine (MHRA, 2015).
May 2014 — minor update. A link to antihistamine prescriptions has been removed and replaced with a link to a prescribing information section with information on licensed doses of antihistamines.
November 2011 — revised. A literature search was conducted in October 2011 to identify evidence-based guidelines, UK policy, systematic reviews, and key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since the last revision of the topic. The topic has been restructured to improve clarity and navigation. Recommendations on managing people who have had an inadequate response to the standard licensed dose of antihistamine have been changed to include the option to double the standard licensed dose of the first choice antihistamine, before considering referral to secondary care for further management. Issued in January 2012.
March 2011 — topic structure revised to ensure consistency across CKS topics. No changes to clinical recommendations have been made.
May 2008 — minor update. Information included from the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) guidelines for the management of chronic urticaria and angio-oedema (2007).
February 2008 — minor update. Updated in line with guidelines for the evaluation and management of urticaria in adults and children from the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD, 2007).
January to April 2007 — this is a new CKS topic, replacing the CKS guidance on Urticaria and angio-oedema. The evidence base has been reviewed in detail, and recommendations are more clearly justified and more transparently linked to the supporting evidence. There are no major changes to the recommendations.
February 2006 — minor update. Black triangle removed from desloratadine.
November 2005 — minor technical update.
July 2005 — new CKS patient information leaflet attached.
January 2004 — written. Validated in March 2004 and issued in June 2004.
Update
New evidence
Evidence-based guidelines
No new evidence-based guidelines since 1 August 2022.
HTAs (Health Technology Assessments)
No new HTAs published since 1 August 2022.
Economic appraisals
No new economic appraisals relevant to England since 1 August 2022.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
No new systematic reviews or meta-analyses published since 1 August 2022.
Primary evidence
- Giménez-Arnau, A., Ferrucci, S., Ben-Shoshan, M., et al. (2025). Rilzabrutinib in Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: The RILECSU Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA dermatology. [Abstract]
New policies
No new national policies or guidelines since 1 August 2022.
New safety alerts
No new safety alerts since 1 August 2022.
Changes in product availability
- New product Xolair (omalizumab 75mg, 150mg, 300mg) solution for injection in pre-filled pen. New presentation (already available ad pre-filled syringes) is licensed for the treatment of adults, adolescents and children (≥6 years) with allergic asthma, adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and adults and adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria. See more here.
- New product Allevia Hives (fexofenadine hydrochloride) 180 mg tablets. This non-sedating H1 antihistamine is licensed as a ‘Pharmacy’ medicine for the relief of symptoms associated with chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults and children 12 years and older. See more here.
- New product, omlyclo (omalizumab) 150mg solution for injection pre-filled pen, is licensed for the treatment of chronic sponataneous urticaria. See more here.
- New product: Omlyclo (omalizumab) 300 mg/2 ml Solution is licensed for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria.. See more here.
Goals and outcome measures
Goals
To support primary healthcare professionals to:
- Make a diagnosis of urticaria.
- Determine the cause of urticaria where possible.
- Manage a person with urticaria.
- Provide information and education on urticaria for the person and/or their parents/carers.
- Appropriately refer people who require further assessment and/or specialist or secondary care treatment.
Outcome measures
No outcome measures were found during the review of this topic.Audit criteria
No audit criteria were found during the review of this topic.QOF indicators
No QOF indicators were found during the review of this topic.QIPP - Options for local implementation
No QIPP indicators were found during the review of this topic.NICE quality standards
No NICE quality standards were found during the review of this topic.Background information
What is it?
- Urticaria (also known as hives, weals, or nettle rash) is a superficial swelling of the skin (epidermis and mucous membranes) that results in a red (initially with a pale centre), raised, and intensely itchy rash.
- Angio-oedema is a deeper form of urticaria with transient swellings of deeper dermal, subcutaneous, and submucosal tissues, often affecting the face (lips, tongue, and eyelids), genitalia, hands, or feet. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.
- Urticaria and angio-oedema can co-exist (in about 40% of cases), but either can occur separately [BMJ, 2016].
- Urticaria can be classified:
- According to its duration, as:
- Acute urticaria — symptoms last for less than 6 weeks.
- Chronic urticaria — symptoms persist for 6 weeks or longer, on a nearly daily basis.
- According to its cause. Current guidelines and expert opinion classify chronic urticaria as:
- Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU, previously called chronic idiopathic urticaria), and this also includes autoimmune urticaria.
- Chronic inducible urticaria (previously called physical urticaria).
- According to its duration, as:
[Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021; Sanchez-Borges, 2021a; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a]
What are the causes/trigger factors?
- Urticaria is a mast cell-driven disease.
- The release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators (such as leukotrienes and prostaglandins) from activated mast cells results in the characteristic pruritus, vascular permeability (leading to plasma leakage from the capillary into the skin), and oedema.
- Acute urticaria (urticaria that lasts for less than 6 weeks) is usually a self-limiting, one-off episode [NICE, 2014; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a]. It can occur spontaneously or in response to a trigger, typically an acute viral infection (especially in children) or an allergic reactions, for example to [Imbalzano, 2016; BMJ, 2016]:
- Certain foods, such as milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, and shellfish.
- Insect bites and stings.
- Contact allergens, such as latex.
- Certain drugs, such as penicillins, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and vaccinations.
- Chronic urticaria (urticaria that lasts for 6 weeks or longer, typically on most days of the week) can be spontaneous (chronic spontaneous urticaria [CSU]) which now includes autoimmune (autoimmune urticaria [AU]), or inducible (chronic inducible urticaria [CINDU])[Zuberbier et al, 2018; Kayiran, 2019; BAD, 2021; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- CSU occurs with no known identifiable external cause. However, symptoms may be aggravated by heat, stress, certain drugs (for example NSAIDs), and infections (for example viral infection and Helicobacter pylori infection[Imbalzano, 2016]. AU is also included in this group. It is characterized by the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies to the high-affinity receptor for IgE (Fc epsilon R1). It accounts for about 30–50% of chronic urticaria cases [Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019] and may be associated with other autoimmune conditions (such as thyroiditis).
- CINDU occurs in response to a physical stimulus. It can be further classified according to its cause as [Sanchez-Borges, 2021a]:
- Aquagenic urticaria — itchy weals after skin contact with hot or cold water.
- Cholinergic urticaria — itchy weals after active or passive warming (for example from exercise or emotion).
- Cold urticaria — itchy weals after exposure of the skin to cold.
- Heat urticaria — itchy weals after exposure of the skin to heat.
- Symptomatic dermatographism — itching and/or burning skin and the development of strip-shaped weals due to shear force acting on the skin.
- Delayed pressure urticaria — erythematous skin swelling after the application of sustained pressure (for example after sitting or lying, or due to tight clothing).
- Solar urticaria — itchy weals that occur after light (UV and/or visible light) exposure.
- Vibratory angiodema — cutaneous swellings immediately after exposure to vibration (for example from use of vibrating tools).
- Contact urticaria — itchy weals after contact with eliciting agent.
How common is it?
- The lifetime prevalence for all types of urticaria is 8–10% [Sanchez-Borges, 2021a].
- The peak age is between 20–40 years [Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019], but it can occur at any age [Zuberbier et al, 2018].
- It is more prevalent in women than men [Sanchez-Borges, 2021a; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20% [Zuberbier et al, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a]:
- It is more common in children and adolescents than in adults, affecting around 3% of children (a small proportion of cases will progress to chronic urticaria) [Leech, 2011].
- It is also common in people with atopy.
- A lifetime prevalence of around 2% has been reported for chronic urticaria [Fricke, 2020; Sanchez-Borges, 2021a]:
- There is geographical variation (more common in Latin America and Asia) and is slightly more common in females as in males.
- It is less common in children, affecting around 0.5%.
What are the complications?
- Complications of chronic urticaria include [BMJ, 2016]:
- Skin infection — due to extensive itching and subsequent excoriation.
- Scarring — uncontrolled excoriation can lead to scarring.
- Poor sleep — due to itching.
- Social isolation and embarrassment.
- Reduced performance at work or school.
- Anxiety and depression.
- Reduced quality of life [Kanani, 2018].
- In addition, angio-oedema can co-exist with chronic urticaria and may lead to airway obstruction, and anaphylaxis (a life-threatening, generalized or systemic hypersensitivity reaction) may rarely occur in people with urticaria. For more information, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis.
What is the prognosis?
- The prognosis for acute urticaria is excellent, as it is normally self-limiting and short-lived. Where treatment is required, most people respond well to standard treatment [Kanani, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) approximately 50% of people go into remission after 6 months to 5 years [BAD, 2021]:
- People with autoimmune urticaria experience a more intense and protracted disease course.
- Severe symptoms, associated angio-oedema, and positive antithyroid antibodies are associated with lasting duration of chronic urticaria.
- Around 45% of people with CSU respond to non-sedating anti-histamines at licensed doses.
- Around two-thirds of those who are unresponsive to anti-histamines will respond to omalizumab.
- Around 20% of people with chronic urticaria will still have active disease after 10 years.
- Around 10% of people with chronic urticaria will still have active disease after 20 years.
- About 30-50% of children with chronic urticaria are disease-free 3 years after presentation [Caffarelli, 2019].
- Recurrence may occur after several years [BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
Diagnosis
How should I diagnose urticaria?
- Take a history. Ask about:
- Time of onset of the disease.
- The frequency, duration, and pattern of recurrence of the weals.
- In acute urticaria, symptoms last for less than 6 weeks.
- In chronic urticaria, symptoms persist for 6 weeks or longer (on a nearly daily basis).
- In some people urticaria is episodic, lasting for hours or days and recurring over months or years.
- The shape, size, distribution, and nature of the weals, including whether they are itchy or painful.
- Severity of symptoms. Consider assessing the severity of urticaria using a validated tool, such as the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index or the Urticaria Control Test.
- Using the UAS7, the person records the severity of itching and the number of weals daily for 7 days.
- A score of less than 7 in 1 week indicates control of disease, whereas a score of more than 28 per week indicates severe disease.
- Any known causes/trigger factors, such as stress, drug treatments (including complementary and topical treatments), insect bites and stings, exercise, and certain foods.
- A detailed history usually enables an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy to be excluded as a cause of urticaria.
- In IgE-mediated food allergy, symptoms typically occur reproducibly within 1 hour of exposure to the offending food rather than coming on overnight or being present first thing in the morning.
- Any treatment(s) tried and response to the treatment(s).
- A family history of urticaria or atopy.
- Any co-existing medical conditions, such as previous or current allergies, infections, psychosomatic or psychiatric diseases, or autoimmune conditions.
- Any gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Occurrence of symptoms in relation to the menstrual cycle (in women), foreign travels, work, or hobbies.
- Examine the person.
- Weals can vary in size (from a few millimetres to hand-sized lesions), may be single or numerous, and can be localized or generalized.
- They consist of three typical features:
- A central swelling of variable size (red or white in colour), almost invariably surrounded by an area of redness (flare).
- Associated itching or, sometimes, burning sensation.
- A fleeting nature, with the skin returning to its normal appearance, usually within 1–24 hours.
- Consider alternative diagnoses.
- In particular, consider vasculitic urticaria if the lesions remain for longer than 24 hours and are painful, non-blanching, and palpable (leaving a residual pigmented lesion, such as petechial haemorrhage, purpura, or bruising), especially if the person also has systemic symptoms, such as fever, malaise, and arthralgia.
- Investigations are not usually required. However, when a cause cannot be identified from the history, and differential diagnoses have been excluded, consider appropriate investigations to help identify the cause (especially in people with chronic urticaria). See the section on investigations for more information.
- If angioedema or anaphylaxis is suspected, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for management information.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are based on the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria [Zuberbier et al, 2018], the management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline [Caffarelli, 2019], the British Association of Dermatologists Guidelines for the management of people with chronic urticaria [BAD, 2021], and on expert opinion in review articles on urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
History and examination
- Experts advise that the diagnosis of urticaria should be based on a thorough clinical history and examination [Powell, 2015; Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- The recommendation to consider assessing the severity of symptoms using a validated tool, such as the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), is based on clinical consensus in the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline, which highlights that because the signs and symptoms are evaluated by the person with urticaria, the UAS7 is a valuable assessment tool [Zuberbier et al, 2018].
- The BSACI guideline does not specifically recommend the use of the UAS7 tool, but states that disease-specific quality of life questionnaires/symptom scores are available for determining the frequency, duration, and severity of urticarial episodes [Powell, 2015].
- Expert opinion in a review article is that the UAS7 tool 'allows for efficient clinical practice, maximizing the information gathered during patient visits while minimizing the use of resources and time' [Moolani, 2016].
- The Urticaria Severity Score (USS), a 12-question tool, is an alternative tool for monitoring disease severity [Moolani, 2016].
- The information on immunoglobuling E (IgE)-mediated food allergy is based on expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015].
- The characteristics of an urticarial rash are taken from the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline [Zuberbier et al, 2018] and the expert review article [BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- The clinical features of vasculitic urticaria are taken from the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline [Zuberbier et al, 2018] and an expert review article on urticaria and angio-oedema [BMJ Best Practice, 2022b].
Investigations not usually required
- Expert opinion in guidelines and review articles is that investigations are not always necessary for the diagnosis of urticaria, but may be needed (especially in people with chronic urticaria) to identify treatable associated conditions/trigger factors and to exclude other unusual conditions, such as urticarial vasculitis[Marzano, 2015; Powell, 2015] [Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- See the section on Investigations for more information.
Which investigations should I consider?
- Investigations are not usually required for the diagnosis of urticaria. Consider the following investigations, if indicated after a thorough history and examination, to identify treatable associated conditions, identify trigger factors, or exclude differential diagnoses:
- Liver function tests (LFTs) — include viral hepatitis screen if transaminases are abnormal.
- Thyroid function tests (TFTs) — the presence of thyroid autoantibodies is associated with chronic urticaria in both children and adults and suggests a diagnosis of autoimmune urticaria. There is evidence that people with urticaria are more likely to have thyroid autoimmunity than people without urticaria.
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) — an elevated ESR and/or CRP suggests an underlying systemic condition, such as chronic infection or vasculitis, and a high ESR with normal CRP may indicate paraproteinaemia.
- Full blood count (FBC) — eosinophil count may be elevated in parasitic infections and in some drug-induced reactions. An elevated neutrophil count may be associated with urticarial vasculitis.
- Helicobacter pylori testing (if gastrointestinal symptoms are present) — there is some evidence that H. pylori infection is significantly, though weakly, associated with an increased risk of chronic urticaria.
- Allergy testing — this may include patch testing or skin prick testing for suspected contact urticarias, or immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests for specific allergens.
- The diagnosis of immunological chronic urticaria is based on the clinical history and on a positive prick test with the suspected substance and/or measurement of specific IgE.
- Elimination of suspected food or drugs:
- Food allergy can usually be excluded as a cause of urticaria if there is no temporal relationship to a particular food trigger, by either ingestion or contact. Food additives rarely cause chronic urticaria.
- Certain drugs (such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) can cause or aggravate chronic urticaria.
- Skin biopsy — if there is an unusual pattern of presentation or in cases of suspected urticarial vasculitis.
- Urinalysis — screening for haematuria and proteinuria will help to detect the presence of urinary tract infection and renal involvement in vasculitis.
- Physical challenge, for example:
- Cold-induced urticaria can usually be diagnosed by placing an ice cube in a sealed plastic bag over the forearm for up to 10 minutes — weals will appear during rewarming of the skin.
- Dermographism can be confirmed by lightly scratching the skin with a firm object — weals will appear within 10 minutes.
- Aquagenic urticaria can be confirmed by immersing a body part into water or by placing wet towels for a few minutes onto the area of skin most affected — weals (typically 1–3 mm in size) will appear independent of temperature of the water.
- Cholinergic urticaria is triggered by sweating due to heat, emotion, or exercise, and can be provoked by exercising the person in a warm environment, although this is not routinely undertaken — ‘pinpoint’ weals (1–3 mm) and surrounded by large flares occur as a result of an increase in core body temperature.
- Delayed-pressure urticaria can be confirmed by a challenge with 15 pounds of weight suspended over the person's shoulder for 10 to 15 minutes — people with delayed-pressure urticaria experience swelling (which might be painful) with a delay of 4–6 hours (in some cases 12 or 24 hours) after exposure of the skin to a pressure stimulus.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: [Zuberbier et al, 2018]; the BSACI guideline for the management of chronic urticaria and angioedema published by the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) [Powell, 2015]; the management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline [Caffarelli, 2019] and on the British Association of Dermatologists Guidelines for the management of people with chronic urticaria [BAD, 2021] and on expert opinion in review articles on urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Powell, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
Investigations
- Expert opinion in guidelines and review articles is that:
- Investigations are not always necessary but may be needed (especially in people with chronic urticaria) to identify treatable associated conditions/trigger factors and to exclude other unusual conditions, such as urticarial vasculitis [Powell, 2015; Marzano, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- The need for investigation to find an underlying cause should be guided by the presentation and response to treatment [Powell, 2015; BAD, 2021].
- Laboratory tests are not indicated in cases of acute urticaria, unless there are findings on history and physical examination that would indicate the lesions were atypical (for example painful, purpuric, non-blanching, palpable lesions, or lesions that leave residual pigmented skin) [BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- Because acute urticaria will usually resolve spontaneously, laboratory investigations are not usually required, unless supported by the clinical history or physical examination. For people with chronic urticaria, targeted laboratory testing based on clinical suspicion is appropriate [BAD, 2021].
- Based on clinical consensus, the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline recommends [Zuberbier et al, 2018]:
- Limiting routine diagnostic measures to determining the threshold of eliciting factors in inducible urticaria subtypes.
- Limited extended diagnostic measures in chronic spontaneous urticaria based on the person's history.
- Very limited routine diagnostic measures in people with chronic spontaneous urticaria.
- Against any routine diagnostic measures in people with acute urticaria.
Specific investigations
- Thyroid function tests (TFTs)
- There is evidence that people with urticaria are more likely to have thyroid autoimmunity than people without urticaria.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the associations between thyroid autoantibodies and urticaria (n = 14,203 urticaria cases and 12,339 non-urticaria controls) and found that the prevalence of positive thyroid autoantibodies in people with urticaria was higher than for non-urticaria controls [Pan, 2015].
- A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 1,100 urticaria cases and 1,100 matched controls) found the prevalence rates of IgE and IgG autoantibodies in people with chronic spontaneous urticaria are significantly elevated (P < 0.001) and reciprocally correlated [Zhang et al, 2022].
- Allergy testing
- The information on the diagnosis of immunological chronic urticaria is based on expert opinion in a systematic clinical review [Lukacs, 2016].
- Expert opinion in a review article is that skin-prick testing for a broad panel of food or environmental allergens is generally ineffective and is not recommended. However, testing for a specific food or allergen based on the history is more useful and can provide greater diagnostic usefulness [BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
- Expert opinion in the BSACI guideline is that the sight of negative skin prick tests will help to reassure the person that allergy is not the cause of their symptoms and may contribute to improved adherence with long-term antihistamine treatment [Powell, 2015].
- Helicobacter pylori screening
- There some evidence that prevalence of H. pylori infection is higher in people with urticaria than in people without.
- Expert opinion in the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline is that specific testing for H. pylori is not indicated on the presence of urticaria alone [Zuberbier et al, 2018].
- Elimination of suspected drugs or food
- The information on when a food allergy can be excluded as a cause of urticaria is based on expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015].
- Physical challenge
- The information on the physical challenges is based on expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015] and the the management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline [Caffarelli, 2019].
Differential diagnosis
- Differential diagnoses of urticaria include:
- Atopic eczema — lesions are usually accompanied by a greater degree of surrounding xerosis and erythema, and the rash typically lasts beyond 24 hours. For more information, see the CKS topic on Eczema - atopic.
- Contact dermatitis — eczematous rash, at any site related to a topical allergen, in a person of any age. Lesions tend to be more confluent and irritated in nature compared with urticarial lesions, and the rash typically lasts beyond 24 hours. For more information, see the CKS topic on Dermatitis - contact.
- Chronic pruritus — no weals are present (but can be mistaken if urticarial symptoms occur at night and are not seen).
- Erythema multiforme minor — the lesions are usually fixed and have a 'target' appearance (often people have a prodromal illness).
- Insect bite or sting — these tend to be smaller papules and typically last beyond 24 hours. For more information, see the CKS topic on Insect bites and stings.
- Pemphigoid (bullous) and dermatitis herpetiformis — the early lesions are pruritic and have a similar appearance to an urticarial rash.
- Polymorphic eruption of pregnancy — urticarial itchy papules mainly occur in the third trimester of pregnancy, often starting on abdominal stretch marks.
- Urticaria pigmentosa (a form of mastocytosis) — the skin becomes inflamed and red when stroked (Derier's sign) and has hyperpigmented macules and papules.
- Urticarial vasculitis — lesions remain for longer than 24 hours and are painful, non-blanching, and palpable (leaving a residual pigmented lesion, such as petechial haemorrhage, purpura, or bruising). There may be systemic symptoms, such as fever, malaise, and arthralgia. Causes include infection (hepatitis B or C, glandular fever, or streptococcal infection), certain drugs (for example penicillins, fluoxetine, thiazide diureticss, allopurinol, quinolones, or carbamazepine), autoimmune disease, paraproteinaemia, and malignancy.
Basis for recommendation
This information is based on expert opinion in review articles on urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Kayiran, 2019] and [BMJ Best Practice, 2022a].
Management
Scenario: Managing urticaria
From birth onwards.
How should I manage a person with urticaria?
For people with urticaria and suspected anaphylaxis (characterized by features of upper or lower airway obstruction or shock), see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for management information.
For people with urticaria and angio-oedema, see the CKS topic on Angio-oedema and anaphylaxis for management information.
For all other people with urticaria:
- Identify and manage the underlying causes/trigger factors of urticaria, where possible.
- If avoidable triggers are identified, given clear instructions on avoidance strategies.
- If the person is taking a drug associated with chronic urticaria, for example a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), it is prudent for the person to have a trial for at least several weeks without this treatment.
- If a cause cannot be identified from the history for people with recurrent or persistent urticaria, consider arranging appropriate investigations.
- Symptom diaries can be useful as an investigative tool to determine the frequency, duration, and severity of the urticarial episodes. Consider assessing the severity of urticaria using a validated tool, such as the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7).
- With the UAS7, the person records the severity of itching and the number of weals daily for 7 days. A score of less than 7 in 1 week indicates control of disease, whereas a score of more than 28 per week indicates severe disease.
- If avoidable triggers are identified, given clear instructions on avoidance strategies.
- For people with mild urticaria with an identifiable and avoidable cause/trigger, advise that urticaria is likely to be self-limiting without treatment.
- For people with symptoms requiring treatment:
- Offer a non-sedating antihistamine (for example cetirizine, fexofenadine, or loratadine) for up to 6 weeks (use clinical judgement to determine the duration of treatment).
- See the section on Prescribing information for detailed information on choice and licensed doses of non-sedating antihistamines.
- If symptoms are severe, give a short course of an oral corticosteroid (for example prednisolone 40 mg daily for up to 7 days) in addition to the non-sedating oral antihistamine.
- Consider referral if an oral corticosteroid is indicated in a child younger than 16 years of age.
- If rebound symptoms occur, seek specialist advice. Do not repeat the course of oral corticosteroids.
- If symptoms improve, consider the need for further antihistamine treatment, based on an assessment of the underlying cause, and the duration of symptoms before treatment.
- If it is likely that symptoms will be persistent or recurrent (for example in people with chronic spontaneous urticaria), prescribe daily antihistamine treatment for 3–6 months, then review.
- If symptoms were short lived and frequent recurrence thought unlikely, prescribe treatment to be taken as required or prophylactically (for example prior to occasions when symptoms would be most unwelcome, such as business meetings).
- If there is an inadequate response to the first-line antihistamine treatment, consider the following options, using clinical judgement:
- In adults, gradually increase the dose of the first-line antihistamine to up to four times the standard licensed dose (off-label use). Consider seeking specialist advice if this approach is being considered in a child.
- Switch to an alternative non-sedating antihistamine.
- Consider prescribing a leukotriene receptor antagonist (such as montelukast or zafirlukast) in addition to the non-sedating anti-histamine.
- Prescribe a topical antipruritic treatment (such as calamine lotion or topical menthol 1% in aqueous cream) to relieve itch.
- Prescribe an additional sedative antihistamine (such as chlorphenamine) at night, if itch is interfering with sleep. See the section on prescribing information for information on prescribing chlorphenamine.
- Refer the person to a dermatologist or immunologist.
- Offer a non-sedating antihistamine (for example cetirizine, fexofenadine, or loratadine) for up to 6 weeks (use clinical judgement to determine the duration of treatment).
- Consider assessing the impact of urticaria on the person's quality of life using a validated tool, such as the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL).
- The CU-Q2oL is a self-administered, 23-item questionnaire on which the person has to indicate, on a Likert scale with multiple options (1: not at all; 5: very much), how much they have been troubled by each problem, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
- Arrange referral to:
- A dermatologist or immunologist for:
- People with urticaria that is painful and persistent (suspect vasculitic urticaria).
- People whose symptoms are not well controlled on antihistamine treatment. Secondary care treatment options include cyclosporine, omalizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, or tacrolimus.
- People with angio-oedema and no wheals that do not respond to first-line treatment.
- People with acute severe urticaria which is thought to be due to a food or latex allergy.
- People with forms of chronic inducible urticaria that may be difficult to manage in primary care, for example, solar or cold urticaria.
- A clinical psychologist for people whose symptoms are adversely affecting their quality of life, for example causing significant social or psychological problems.
- A dermatologist or immunologist for:
- Provide additional information on urticaria. For example:
- NHS A-Z has useful information on Urticaria (hives).
- The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) has produced an information leaflet on Urticaria and Angioedema.
- Allergy UK, a national charity dedicated to supporting allergy sufferers in the UK, has a useful factsheet on Urticaria (hives) and other skin allergy. It also has a dedicated helpline.
Basis for recommendation
These recommendations are largely based on the BSACI guideline for the management of chronic urticaria and angioedema published by the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) [Powell, 2015]; The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the World Allergy Organization (WAO) [Zuberbier et al, 2018]; the management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline [Caffarelli, 2019], the British Association of Dermatologists Guidelines for the management of people with chronic urticaria [BAD, 2021], and on expert opinion in review articles on urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; Kolkhir, 2020; Sanchez-Borges, 2021b; BMJ Best Practice, 2022b].
Managing urticaria
- The principles of managing urticaria are similar to those for other mast cell-dependent diseases and are based on elimination/avoidance of the cause/triggers (where possible), symptomatic treatment, patient education, and a personalized management plan [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021].
- The recommendations on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and symptom diaries are based on expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021].
Considering using a validated tool, such as the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), to assess disease severity
This recommendation is based on clinical consensus in the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline, which highlights that because the signs and symptoms are evaluated by the person with urticaria, the UAS7 is a valuable assessment tool [Zuberbier et al, 2018]:
- The BSACI guideline does not specifically recommend the use of the UAS7 tool, but states that disease-specific quality of life questionnaires/symptom scores are available for determining the frequency, duration, and severity of urticarial episodes [Powell, 2015].
- Expert opinion in a review article is that the UAS7 tool 'allows for efficient clinical practice, maximizing the information gathered during patient visits while minimizing the use of resources and time' [Moolani, 2016].
- The Urticaria Severity Score (USS, a 12-question tool) is an alternative tool for monitoring disease severity [Moolani, 2016].
First-line treatment with an oral non-sedating histamine H1-receptor antagonist
- All H1-antihistamines are licensed for use in urticaria. However, based on clinical experience and limited evidence, experts recommend that the non-sedating ones are used first line [Marzano, 2015; Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021]:
- A Cochrane systematic review (search date: June 2014, not yet updated) assessed the effects of H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU, n = 9759) and found that cetirizine, desloratadine, and levocetirizine are effective when compared with placebo. Loratadine showed no significant difference when compared with placebo [Sharma, 2014].
- Adverse effects, such as headache and dry mouth, were tolerable with most antihistamines, but the evidence was less clear for improvement in quality of life (for example reduction in sleep disturbance from itching and less distress from the appearance of hives) as many studies did not address this.
- There was no strong evidence that one non-sedating antihistamine was more effective than the other.
- The authors pointed out that all results were gathered from a few studies or, in some cases, from single-study estimates. The quality of the evidence was affected by the small number of studies in each comparison and the small sample size for many of the outcomes.
- The recommendation to offer initial antihistamine treatment for up to 6 weeks is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice, considering that symptoms of acute urticaria last for less than 6 weeks. In addition, the guidelines recommend waiting 2-4 weeks to allow full effectiveness of a treatment before up-titrating the dose, or changing to/adding an alternative treatment [Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021].
Managing people with severe symptoms
- Corticosteroids are potent immunosuppressants and can therefore suppress the symptoms of urticaria. Although there are no controlled studies on their use for this indication, their effectiveness is generally accepted and recommended by experts. However, they are only recommended for short periods (as rescue therapy) due to the risk of potentially severe adverse effects (such as diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, and gastrointestinal bleeding)[Marzano, 2015; Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021].
- The recommended dose and duration of corticosteroid treatment are based on expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015] and the British Association of Dermatologists Guideline [BAD, 2021].
Considering the need for further antihistamine treatment if symptoms improve
- This recommendation is largely based on the BSACI guideline, which states that once symptom control has been accomplished, daily antihistamine treatment for 3-6 months is advised for most people with CSU, and as required or prophylactic treatment for people with infrequent symptoms [Powell, 2015].
Managing inadequate reponse to first-line treatment
- Incremental updosing of the first-line treatment (up to fourfold higher than the standard licensed dose) is recommended by experts for people who do not respond to standard doses (off-label use)[Marzano, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021]:
- Although there is some evidence for this approach, the long-term safey has not been studied and it is not always effective [Marzano, 2015].
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) identified 2 small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 double-blind crossover studies (total n = 76) which suggest that cetirizine 20 mg daily (double the standard licensed dose for adults) may improve weals and itching in adults with severe chronic urticaria refractory to standard doses of antihistamines, and appears to be well tolerated. However, symptoms remained in a proportion of people and the studies had many limitations [NICE, 2014]. NICE found little information on the use of off-label doses of cetirizine in people aged under 16 years or over 65 years and no data from high-quality studies on the use of cetirizine at doses higher than 20 mg.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of antihistamine updosing with standard dosing in people with CSU and found that updosing of non-sedating antihistamines significantly improved control of pruritus but not weal number [Guillén-Aguinaga, 2016]. However, the authors were unable to reach a final conclusion due to the relative weakness of the studies and the significant heterogeneity among them (of the 15 articles included in the final evaluation, only five were assessed as high quality).
- Expert opinion in the BSACI guideline, the BAD guideline and the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline is that updosing with a single antihistamine is preferable to mixing different antihistamines [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021].
- The recommendation to consider seeking specialist advice if updosing is being considered in a child is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice, although updosing in children is recommended in guidelines [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021].
- Although there is some evidence for this approach, the long-term safey has not been studied and it is not always effective [Marzano, 2015].
- Topical antipruritic treatment is recommended [BAD, 2021]:
- Menthol 1% in aqueous cream is cooling [Powell, 2015] and is reported to soothe itch [Greaves and Sabroe, 1998]. One small study in 15 healthy volunteers found that a menthol 1% (in ethanol) solution successfully relieved histamine-induced itching [Bromm et al, 1995].
- Sedating antihistamines are not generally recommended for the treatment of urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021]. However, some experts advise that they might be considered when itch is interfering with sleep [Powell, 2015; BNF, 2022].
- The recommendation to also consider referral to a dermatologist or immunologist is based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
Assessing the impact of urticaria on the person's quality of life
- The recommendation to consider assessing the impact of urticaria on the person's quality of life (and to monitor disease activity) using a validated tool, such as the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), is based on clinical consensus in the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline [Zuberbier et al, 2018].
- The BSACI guideline does not specifically recommend the use of the CU-Q2oL tool, but states that disease-specific quality of life questionnaires/symptom scores are available for determining the frequency, duration, and severity of urticarial episodes [Powell, 2015].
- Expert opinion in a review article is that the CU-Q2oL tool is an evidence-based tool that 'has been assessed and then validated for determining health status, and used worldwide by both dermatologist and patients for further research in this field' [Marzano, 2015].
- The Urticaria Control Test (UCT), a retrospective, four-item questionnaire, is an alternative tool that can be used to determine control of disease [BAD, 2021].
Referral
- These recommendations are based on what CKS considers to be good clinical practice.
- Information on secondary care treatments is taken from guidelines [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021] and review articles [Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kolkhir, 2020; Nochaiwong, 2021; BMJ, 2016] on urticaria.
- NICE recommends omalizumab as an add-on treatment for refractory severe CSU in adults and young people aged 12 years [NICE, 2015]. See the NICE technology appraisal guidance Omalizumab for previously treated chronic spontaneous urticaria for detailed information.
Treatments not recommended
- Topical corticosteroids — expert opinion in the BSACI guideline [Powell, 2015] and a review article is that topical steroids have no place in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Although they can reduce weal formation, they can lead to adverse effects due to the need for long-term use over a large surface area [Kozel and Sabroe, 2005].
- Topical antihistamines — there is a risk of sensitization and/or contact dermatitis associated with their use [Kozel and Sabroe, 2005; BNF, 2022].
- H2-antihistamines (cimetidine and ranitidine) — the evidence for their use in urticaria is weak [Powell, 2015]. Expert opinion in review articles is that since 15% of the histamine receptors in the skin are H2 receptors, H2-antihistamines may provide a small amount of additional benefit to treatment when used in combination with full-dose H1-receptor antagonists [Fitzsimons, 2015; BMJ, 2016]. However, this approach is not widely recommended.
Prescribing information
Important aspects of prescribing information relevant to primary healthcare are covered in this section specifically for the drugs recommended in this CKS topic. For further information on contraindications, cautions, drug interactions, and adverse effects, see the electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) or the British National Formulary (BNF).
Non-sedating antihistamines
Which non-sedating antihistamine should I prescribe?
- For most adults, cetirizine, loratadine, and fexofenadine are usual choices as their long-term safety has been well established and their once-daily dosage may improve adherence [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021]. However, any suitable non-sedating antihistamine can be considered as all are licensed for the treatment of urticaria, and there is no strong evidence that one is more effective than the other
- [Powell, 2015; Zuberbier et al, 2018; BAD, 2021].
- In children, cetirizine, loratadine, or fexofenadine are usual choices and have been well studied[Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021]:
- The choice of antihistamine should depend on the age of the child (licensed ages differ), availabilities (as not all are available in syrup form), and preference (for example what has worked in the past).
- When considering up-dosing in teenagers, bear in mind that cetrizine may induce somnolence[Sanchez-Borges, 2021b].
- The British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) states that desloratadine or levocetirizine should be reserved for children who cannot tolerate other treatments, because they do not confer any additional benefit [BNF for children, 2022].
- During pregnancy, oral antihistamines should be avoided where possible, especially during the first trimester. However, if a non-sedating antihistamine is required, loratadine is recommended as there is considerable clinical experience with its use in pregnancy, with no increase in the rate of congenital abnormalities [Powell, 2015]. Cetirizine, desloratadine (an active metabolite of loratadine), or levocetirizine (an isomer of cetirizine) may also be considered [Zuberbier et al, 2018].
- Most manufacturers of antihistamines advise avoiding their use during pregnancy [BNF, 2022]; however, there is no evidence of teratogenicity with their use.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to H1-antihistamines found that they do not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major malformation or other adverse fetal outcomes (spontaneous abortions, prematurity, stillbirth, and low birth weight) [Etwel, 2017].
- During breastfeeding, loratadine and cetirizine are recommended. The lowest effective dose for the shortest period of time should be prescribed [Powell, 2015].
- Most manufacturers of antihistamines advise avoiding their use during breastfeeding as most antihistamines are present in breast milk (in varying amounts)[Zuberbier et al, 2018; BNF, 2022].
- However, LactMed (a US drugs and lactation database) states that:
- Loratadine would not be expected to cause any adverse effects in breastfed infants due to its lack of sedation and low milk levels, but it might have a negative effect on lactation[LactMed, 2018].
- Cetirizine is probably acceptable during breastfeeding if given in small, occasional doses. However, larger doses or more prolonged use may cause drowsiness and other effects in the infant, or decrease the milk supply particularly before lactation is well established [LactMed, 2021].
What are the contraindications and cautions?
- Do not prescribe:
- Cetirizine to people with:
- End stage renal disease — estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
- Acute porphyria.
- Cetirizine to people with:
- Prescribe:
- Cetirizine with caution to people with renal impairment.
- If the eGFR is 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2, use half the normal dose.
- If the eGFR is 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2 use 5 mg once every 2 days.
- Loratadine with caution to people with hepatic impairment.
- Reduce dose frequency to alternate days in severe impairment.
- Cetirizine with caution to people with renal impairment.
What are the licensed doses for chronic idiopathic urticaria?
- The licensed oral doses of cetirizine are:
- Children aged 2 years to 5 years — 2.5 mg twice daily.
- Cetirizine is not licensed for use in children aged under 2 years, but the British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) recommends an unlicensed dose of 250 micrograms/kg twice daily for children aged 1 year [BNF for children, 2022].
- Children aged 6 years to 11 years — 5 mg twice daily.
- Adults and children aged 12 years and over — 10 mg once daily.
- Children aged 2 years to 5 years — 2.5 mg twice daily.
- The licensed oral doses of loratadine are:
- Children aged 2 years to 11 years and body weight up to 31 kg — 5 mg once a day.
- Children age 2 years to 11 years and body weight 31 kg and over —10 mg once a day.
- Adults and children aged 12 years and over — 10 mg once a day.
- The licensed oral dose of fexofenadine is:
- Adults and children aged 12 years and over — 180 mg once a day.
What are the possible adverse effects?
- Non-sedating antihistamines are associated with a lower incidence of drowsiness and sedation (because they penetrate the blood-brain barrier to a lesser extent than sedating antihistamines) [Bernstein, 2014]. However, these adverse effects may still occur.
- Fexofenadine and loratadine may cause sedation at doses exceeding the recommended doses.
- Cetirizine may cause sedation at recommended doses.
- The sedative effects of antihistamines are enhanced when combined with alcohol.
- Rare adverse effects of antihistamines include hypotension, palpitation, arrhythmias, extrapyramidal effects, dizziness, confusion, depression, sleep disturbances, tremor, convulsions, hypersensitivity reactions (including bronchospasm, angioedema, anaphylaxis, rashes, and photosensitivity reactions), blood disorders, liver dysfunction, nightmares, acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis, arthralgia and angle-closure glaucoma.
- The manufacturer's SPC notes that desloratadine has been associated with an increased incidence of new-onset seizures in patients younger than 20 years of age.
What drug interactions are associated with antihistamines?
- Drug interactions associated with non-sedating antihistamines include:
- Ritonavir — plasma concentration of non-sedating antihistamines possibly increased by ritonavir.
- In addition for fexofenadine:
- Antacids — absorption of fexofenadine reduced by antacids.
- Rifampicin — effects of fexofenadine possibly reduced by rifampicin.
- Ulipristal acetate — the manufacturer of ulipristal acetate advises that fexofenadine is taken at least 1.5 hours before or after taking ulipristal.
- In addition for loratadine:
- Cimetidine — the manufacturer of loratadine advises that plasma concentrations are possibly increased by cimetidine.
- Erythromycin — the manufacturer of loratadine advises that plasma concentrations are possibly increased by erythromycin.
- Drug interactions associated with all antihistamines include:
- Alcohol — increased sedative effect when antihistamines are taken with alcohol (possibly less effect with non-sedating antihistamines).
- Antidepressants (tricyclics, tricyclic-related, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs]):
- Increased antimuscarinic and sedative effects when antihistamines are taken with tricyclics or MAOIs.
- Possible increased antimuscarinic and sedative effects when antihistamines are taken with tricyclic-related antidepressants.
- Antimuscarinics — increased risk of antimuscarinic adverse effects when antihistamines are taken with antimuscarinic drugs (dosage adjustment may be required).
- Note that many drugs have antimuscarinic effects. Concurrent use of two or more of such drugs can increase the risk of adverse effects, such as dry mouth, urine retention, and constipation. Concurrent use can also lead to confusion in the elderly. Interactions do not generally apply to inhaled antimuscarinics.
- Anxiolytics, hypnotics, and opioids — increased sedative effect when antihistamines are taken with these groups of drugs.
- Betahistine — antihistamines theoretically antagonize the effects of betahistine.
- Midodrine — avoidance of antihistamines advised by manufacturer of midodrine.
Sedating antihistamines
Which sedating antihistamine should I prescribe?
- For most adults and children (aged 1 month and older), guidelines now recommend against routinely prescribing sedating anti-histamines [Zuberbier et al, 2018; Caffarelli, 2019; BAD, 2021]:
- There are concerns about their short and long-term effects on the central nervous system.
- Only use when there is no alternative available [BAD, 2021].
- During pregnancy, oral antihistamines should be avoided where possible, especially during the first trimester.
- Most manufacturers of antihistamines advise avoiding their use during pregnancy; however, there is no evidence of teratogenicity with their use, except for hydroxyzine where toxicity has been reported with high doses in animal studies.
- The use of sedating antihistamines in the latter part of the third trimester may also cause adverse effects in neonates, such as irritability, paradoxical excitability, and tremor [BNF, 2022].
- During breastfeeding, non-sedating antihistamines are recommended.
What are the contraindications and cautions for chlorphenamine?
- Do not prescribe chlorphenamine to:
- People with severe hepatic impairment — increased risk of coma.
- Prescribe chlorphenamine with caution in:
- People with:
- Hepatic impairment.
- Epilepsy — avoid antihistamines if possible as they reduce the seizure threshold.
- Renal impairment.
- Prostatic hypertrophy.
- Urinary retention.
- Severe hypertension or cardiovascular disease.
- Raised intraocular pressure or glaucoma.
- Pyloroduodenal obstruction.
- Asthma, bronchitis, or bronchiectasis.
- Children and the elderly (as they are more susceptible to adverse effects) — be aware of a reduced maximum daily dose in children and elderly people.
- People with:
What are the licensed doses of chlorphenamine for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria?
- Sedating antihistamines are no longer recommended by guidelines for routine use in urticaria.
- The licensed oral daily doses of chlorphenamine are [BNF, 2022; BNF for children, 2022]:
- Age 2 years to 5 years - 1 mg every 4-6 hours; maximum of 6 mg daily.
- Chlorphenamine is not licensed for use in children younger than 1 year [ABPI, 2021c], but the British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) recommends an unlicensed dose of 1 mg twice daily for children aged 1 month to 23 months [BNF for children, 2022].
- Age 6 years to 11 years - 2 mg every 4-6 hours; maximum of 12 mg daily.
- Age 12 years and over (including adults) — 4 mg every 4-6 hours; maximum of 24 mg daily (12 mg daily in elderly people).
- If there is an inadequate response to the first-line antihistamine treatment, consider gradually increasing the dose of the first-line antihistamine to up to four times the standard licensed dose in adults (off-label use). Consider seeking specialist advice if this approach is being considered in a child.
- Age 2 years to 5 years - 1 mg every 4-6 hours; maximum of 6 mg daily.
- For night time use for urticarial symptoms, consider the following doses (using clinical judgement):
- Age 1 month to 23 months - 1 mg at night.
- Age 2 years to 5 years - 2 mg at night.
- Age 6 years to 11 years - 2 to 4 mg at night.
- Age 12 years and over (including adults) - 4 mg at night.
What are the possible adverse effects of chlorphenamine?
- Sedating antihistamines (such as chlorphenamine) cause sedation in 10–50% of people, which can persist into the next day [DTB, 2002]. The sedative effects are enhanced when combined with alcohol.
- Other adverse effects of chlorphenamine include [ABPI, 2021d]:
- Neurological — dizziness, restlessness, psychomotor impairment, and headaches.
- Anticholinergic effects — blurred vision, dry mouth, and urinary retention.
- Skin — urticaria, rash, exfoliative dermatitis, and photosensitivity.
- Gastrointestinal — nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and dyspepsia.
- Cardiovascular — palpitations, tachycardia, and arrhythmias.
- Neuropsychiatric — depressed mood, excitation, irritability, nightmares, and confusion.
- Rare adverse effects of antihistamines include hypotension, extrapyramidal effects, sleep disturbances, tremor, convulsions, hypersensitivity reactions (including bronchospasm, angioedema, and anaphylaxis), blood disorders, liver dysfunction, and angle-closure glaucoma.
What drug interactions are associated with chlorphenamine?
- Drug interactions associated with chlorphenamine include:
- Antidepressants (monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs], tricyclics, and tricyclic-related):
- Chlorphenamine is contraindicated in people who have been treated with MAOIs within the last fourteen days, due to the increased antimuscarinic and sedative effects when antihistamines are taken with MAOIs [ABPI, 2021d].
- There is increased antimuscarinic and sedative effects when antihistamines are taken with tricyclics.
- There is possible increased antimuscarinic and sedative effects when antihistamines are taken with tricyclic-related antidepressants.
- Phenytoin — chlorphenamine inhibits phenytoin metabolism and can lead to phenytoin toxicity. If symptoms of toxicity are present (confusion, blurred vision, nystagmus, ataxia, or drowsiness), monitor serum phenytoin levels and reduce the dose if necessary.
- Antidepressants (monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs], tricyclics, and tricyclic-related):
- Drug interactions associated with all antihistamines include:
- Alcohol — increased sedative effect when antihistamines are taken with alcohol (possibly less effect with non-sedating antihistamines).
- Antimuscarinics — increased risk of antimuscarinic adverse effects when antihistamines are taken with antimuscarinic drugs (dosage adjustment may be required).
- Note that many drugs have antimuscarinic effects. Concurrent use of two or more of such drugs can increase adverse effects, such as dry mouth, urine retention, and constipation. Concurrent use can also lead to confusion in the elderly. Interactions do not generally apply to inhaled antimuscarinics.
- Anxiolytics, hypnotics, and opioids — increased sedative effect when antihistamines are taken with anxiolytics and hypnotics.
- Betahistine — antihistamines theoretically antagonize the effects of betahistine.
- Midodrine — avoidance of antihistamines advised by manufacturer of midodrine.
Oral corticosteroids
What do I need to know about prescribing oral corticosteroids?
- Be aware that:
- Frequent or prolonged use of systemic corticosteroids is associated with serious adverse effects, including growth retardation in children, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, and osteoporosis. However, these are unlikely to be a problem with a single course of prednisolone.
- It is not necessary to taper the dose when stopping a one-week course of prednisolone.
- For detailed prescribing information on oral corticosteroids, including contraindications and cautions, adverse effects, and drug interactions, see the CKS topic on Corticosteroids - oral.
Supporting evidence
The recommendations in this CKS topic are largely based on national and international guidelines, the BSACI Guideline for the management of chronic urticaria and angio-oedema published by the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Powell, 2015], the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria [Zuberbier et al, 2018], the management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline [Caffarelli, 2019], the British Association of Dermatologists Guidelines for the management of people with chronic urticaria [BAD, 2021], and on expert opinion in review articles on urticaria [Marzano, 2015; Kanani, 2018; Hon, 2019; Kayiran, 2019; BMJ Best Practice, 2022a] The rationale for each recommendation is discussed in the relevant basis for recommendation section.
How this topic was developed
This section briefly describes the processes used in developing and updating this topic. Further details on the full process can be found in the About Us section and on the Clarity Informatics website.
Search strategy
Scope of search
A literature search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on primary care management of urticaria.
Search dates
March 2017 - August 2022
Key search terms
Various combinations of searches were carried out. The terms listed below are the core search terms that were used for Medline.
- exp Urticaria/
Sources of guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
- Royal College of Physicians
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Royal College of Nursing
- NICE Evidence
- World Health Organization
- Guidelines International Network
- TRIP database
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
- British Columbia Medical Association
- Canadian Medical Association
- Alberta Medical Association
- Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium
- Singapore Ministry of Health
- National Resource for Infection Control
- RefHELP NHS Lothian Referral Guidelines
- Medline (with guideline filter)
- Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
- NHS Health at Work (occupational health practice)
Sources of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- The Cochrane Library:
- Systematic reviews
- Protocols
- Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
- Medline (with systematic review filter)
- EMBASE (with systematic review filter)
Sources of health technology assessments and economic appraisals
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
- The Cochrane Library:
- NHS Economic Evaluations
- Health Technology Assessments
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
- International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment
Sources of randomized controlled trials
- The Cochrane Library:
- Central Register of Controlled Trials
- Medline (with randomized controlled trial filter)
- EMBASE (with randomized controlled trial filter)
Sources of evidence based reviews and evidence summaries
Sources of national policy
- Department of Health
- Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)
Patient experiences
Sources of medicines information
The following sources are used by CKS pharmacists and are not necessarily searched by CKS information specialists for all topics. Some of these resources are not freely available and require subscriptions to access content.
Stakeholder engagement
Our policy
The external review process is an essential part of CKS topic development. Consultation with a wide range of stakeholders provides quality assurance of the topic in terms of:
- Clinical accuracy.
- Consistency with other providers of clinical knowledge for primary care.
- Accuracy of implementation of national guidance (in particular NICE guidelines).
- Usability.
Principles of the consultation process
- The process is inclusive and any individual may participate.
- To participate, an individual must declare whether they have any competing interests or not. If they do not declare whether or not they have competing interests, their comments will not be considered.
- Comments received after the deadline will be considered, but they may not be acted upon before the clinical topic is issued onto the website.
- Comments are accepted in any format that is convenient to the reviewer, although an electronic format is encouraged.
- External reviewers are not paid for commenting on the draft topics.
- Discussion with an individual or an organization about the CKS response to their comments is only undertaken in exceptional circumstances (at the discretion of the Clinical Editor or Editorial Steering Group).
- All reviewers are thanked and offered a letter acknowledging their contribution for the purposes of appraisal/revalidation.
- All reviewers are invited to be acknowledged on the website. All reviewers are given the opportunity to feedback about the external review process, enabling improvements to be made where appropriate.
Stakeholders
- Key stakeholders identified by the CKS team are invited to comment on draft CKS topics. Individuals and organizations can also register an interest to feedback on a specific topic, or topics in a particular clinical area, through the Getting involved section of the Clarity Informatics website.
- Stakeholders identified from the following groups are invited to review draft topics:
- Experts in the topic area.
- Professional organizations and societies (for example, Royal Colleges).
- Patient organizations, Clarity has established close links with groups such as Age UK and the Alzheimer’s Society specifically for their input into new topic development, review of current topic content and advice on relevant areas of expert knowledge.
- Guideline development groups where the topic is an implementation of a guideline.
- The British National Formulary team.
- The editorial team that develop MeReC Publications.
- Reviewers are provided with clear instructions about what to review, what comments are particularly helpful, how to submit comments, and declaring interests.
Patient engagement
Clarity Informatics has enlisted the support and involvement of patients and lay persons at all stages in the process of creating the content which include:
- Topic selection
- Scoping of topic
- Selection of clinical scenarios
- First draft internal review
- Second draft internal review
- External review
- Final draft and pre-publication
Our lay and patient involvement includes membership on the editorial steering group, contacting expert patient groups, organizations and individuals.
Evidence exclusion criteria
Our policy
Scoping a literature search, and reviewing the evidence for CKS is a methodical and systematic process that is carried out by the lead clinical author for each topic. Relevant evidence is gathered in order that the clinical author can make fully informed decisions and recommendations. It is important to note that some evidence may be excluded for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be applied across all CKS topics or may be specific to a given topic.
Studies identified during literature searches are reviewed to identify the most appropriate information to author a CKS topic, ensuring any recommendations are based on the best evidence. We use the principles of the GRADE and PICOT approaches to assess the quality of published research. We use the principles of AGREE II to assess the quality of published guidelines.
Standard exclusions for scoping literature:
- Animal studies
- Original research is not written in English
Possible exclusions for reviewed literature:
- Sample size too small or study underpowered
- Bias evident or promotional literature
- Population not relevant
- Intervention/treatment not relevant
- Outcomes not relevant
- Outcomes have no clear evidence of clinical effectiveness
- Setting not relevant
- Not relevant to UK
- Incorrect study type
- Review article
- Duplicate reference
Organizational, behavioural and financial barriers
Our policy
The CKS literature searches take into consideration the following concepts, which are discussed at the initial scoping of the topic.
- Feasibility
- Studies are selected depending on whether the intervention under investigation is available in the NHS and can be practically and safely undertaken in primary care.
- Organizational and Financial Impact Analysis
- Studies are selected and evaluated on whether the intervention under investigations may have an impact on local clinical service provision or national impact on cost for the NHS. The principles of clinical budget impact analysis are adhered to, evaluated and recorded by the author. The following factors are considered when making this assessment and analysis.
- Eligible population
- Current interventions
- Likely uptake of new intervention or recommendation
- Cost of the current or new intervention mix
- Impact on other costs
- Condition-related costs
- In-direct costs and service impacts
- Time dependencies
- Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit analysis studies are identified where available.
We also evaluate and include evidence from NICE accredited sources which provide economic evaluations of recommendations, such as NICE guidelines. When a recommended action may not be possible because of resource constraints, this is explicitly indicated to healthcare professionals by the wording of the CKS recommendation.
Declarations of interest
Our policy
Clarity Informatics requests that all those involved in the writing and reviewing of topics, and those involved in the external review process to declare any competing interests. Signed copies are securely held by Clarity Informatics and are available on request with the permission of the individual. A copy of the declaration of interest form which participants are asked to complete annually is also available on request. A brief outline of the declarations of interest policy is described here and full details of the policy is available on the Clarity Informatics website. Declarations of interests of the authors are not routinely published, however competing interests of all those involved in the topic update or development are listed below. Competing interests include:
- Personal financial interests
- Personal family interest
- Personal non-financial interest
- Non-personal financial gain or benefit
Although particular attention is given to interests that could result in financial gains or losses for the individual, competing interests may also arise from academic competition or for political, personal, religious, and reputational reasons. An individual is not obliged to seek out knowledge of work done for, or on behalf of, the healthcare industry within the departments for which they are responsible if they would not normally expect to be informed.
Who should declare competing interests?
Any individual (or organization) involved in developing, reviewing, or commenting on clinical content, particularly the recommendations should declare competing interests. This includes the authoring team members, expert advisers, external reviewers of draft topics, individuals providing feedback on published topics, and Editorial Steering Group members. Declarations of interest are completed annually for authoring team and editorial steering group members, and are completed at the start of the topic update and development process for external stakeholders.
Competing interests declared for this topic:
None.
References
- ABPI (2021a) SPC for Loratadine 10mg tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2021b) SPC for Zirtek Allergy Relief 10 mg film-coated tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc [Free Full-text]
- ABPI (2021c) SPC for Piriton Syrup. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
- ABPI (2021d) SPC for ABPI, Piriton Tablets. Electronic Medicines Compendium. Datapharm Communications Ltd. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc
- BAD (2021) British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for themanagement of people with chronic urticaria 2021. British Journal of Dermatology 186(3), 398-413. [Free Full-text]
- Bernstein, J.A., Lang, D.M., Khan, D.A. et al. (2014) The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 133(5), 1270-1277. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2022a) Assessment of Urticaria. BMJ Best Practice. BMJ publishing. https://bestpractice.bmj.com [Free Full-text]
- BMJ Best Practice (2022b) Urticaria and angio-oedema. BMJ Best Practice. BMJ Publishing. [Free Full-text]
- BMJ (2016) Urticaria and angio-oedema. BMJ Best Practice. http://www.bestpractice.bmj.com
- British National Formulary for Children (2022) British National Formulary for Children. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society. https://bnfc.nice.org.uk
- BNF (2022) British National Formulary. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://bnf.nice.org.uk
- Bromm, B., Scharein, E., Darsow, U. and Ring, J. (1995) Effects of menthol and cold on histamine-induced itch and skin reactions in man. Neuroscience Letters 187(3), 157-160. [Abstract]
- Caffarelli, C., Paravati, F., el Hachem, M., et al. (2019) Management of chronic urticaria in children: A clinical guideline. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 45(1). [Free Full-text]
- DTB (2002) Oral antihistamines for allergic disorders. Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin 40(8), 59-62. [Abstract]
- Etwel, F., Faught, L.H., Rieder, M.J. and Koren, G. (2017) The risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to H1 antihistamines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Safety 40(2), 121-132. [Abstract]
- Fitzsimons, R., van der Poel, L-A. and Thornhill, W. et al. (2015) Antihistamine use in children. Archives Of Disease In Childhood 100(3), 122-131.
- Fricke, J., Ávila, G., Keller, T., et al. (2020) Prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adults across the globe: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 75(2), 423-432. [Free Full-text]
- Greaves, M.W. and Sabroe, R.A. (1998) ABC of allergies. Allergy and the skin. I-urticaria. British Medical Journal 316(7138), 1147-1150.
- Guillén-Aguinaga, S., Jáuregui Presa, I., Aguinaga-Ontoso, E. et al. (2016) Updosing nonsedating antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Dermatology 175(6), 1153-1165.
- Hon, K. L., Leung, A. K. C., Ng, W. G. G. and & Loo, S. K. (2019) Chronic Urticaria: An Overview of Treatment and Recent Patents. Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery 13(1), 27-37. [Free Full-text]
- Imbalzano, E., Casciaro, M., Quartuccio, S. et al. (2016) Association between urticaria and virus infections: A systematic review. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 37(1), 18-22. [Abstract]
- Kanani, A., Betschel, S. D. and & Warrington, R. (2018) Urticaria and angioedema. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, 14. [Free Full-text]
- Kayiran, M. A. and & Akdeniz, N. (2019) Diagnosis and treatment of urticaria in primary care. Northern Clinics of Istanbul 6(1), 93-99. [Free Full-text]
- Kolkhir, P., Altrichter, S., Munoz, M., et al. (2020) New treatments for chronic urticaria. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 124(1), 2-12. [Free Full-text]
- Kozel, M.M.A. and Sabroe, R.A. (2005) Chronic urticaria: aetiology, management and current and future treatment options. Drugs 64(22), 2515-2536. [Abstract]
- LactMed (2018) Loratadine. US National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
- LactMed (2021) Cetirizine. US National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Free Full-text]
- Leech, S., Grattan, C. and Lloyd, K. et al. (2011) The RCPCH care pathway for children with urticaria, angio-oedema or mastocytosis: an evidence and consensus based national approach. Archives of Disease in Childhood 96(Suppl 2). [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- Lukacs, J., Schliemann, S. and and Elsner, P. (2016) Occupational contact urticaria caused by food - a systematic clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 75(4), 195-204. [Abstract]
- Marzano, A.V., Pigatto, P., Cristaudo, A., et al. (2015) Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: practical parameters. Giornale Italiano Di Dermatologia E Venereologia 150(2), 237-246.
- Moolani, Y., Lynde, C. and and Sussman, G. (2016) Advances in understanding and managing chronic urticaria. F1000Research 5(F1000), 177. [Abstract] [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2014) Chronic urticaria: off-label doses of cetirizine. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.. [Free Full-text]
- NICE (2015) Omalizumab for previously treated chronic spontaneous urticaria. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk [Free Full-text]
- Nochaiwong S, Chuamanochan M, Ruengorn C, Awiphan R, Tovanabutra N, Chiewchanvit S. (2021) Evaluation of Pharmacologic Treatments for H1 Antihistamine–Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 157(11), 1316-1327. [Free Full-text]
- Pan, XF., Gu, JQ. and and Shan, ZY. (2015) The prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity in patients with urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 48(3), 804-810. [Abstract]
- Powell, R.J., Leech, S.C., Till, S., et al. (2015) BSACI guideline for the management of chronic urticaria and angioedema. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 45(3), 547-565. [Abstract]
- Sánchez-Borges, M., Ansotegui, I. J., Baiardini, I., et al. (2021a) The challenges of chronic urticaria part 1: Epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, comorbidities, quality of life, and management. The World Allergy Organization Journal 14(6). [Free Full-text]
- Sánchez-Borges, M., Ansotegui, I. J., Baiardini, I., et al. (2021b) The challenges of chronic urticaria part 2: Pharmacological treatment, chronic inducible urticaria, urticaria in special situations. The World Allergy Organization Journal 6. [Free Full-text]
- Sharma, M., Bennett, C. and Cohen, S.N. et al. (2014) H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochranelibrary.com
- Zhang et al. (2022) IgE and IgG Anti-Thyroid Autoantibodies in Chinese Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and a Literature Review. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 14(1), 131-142. [Free Full-text]
- Zuberbier, T., Aberer, W., Asero, R., et al. (2018) The EAACI/GALEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. The European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 73(7), 1393-1414. [Free Full-text]